Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2020 Jan 14;20(2):1003–1008. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04130

Mid- and Long-Wave Infrared Optoelectronics via Intraband Transitions in PbS Colloidal Quantum Dots

Iñigo Ramiro , Onur Özdemir , Sotirios Christodoulou , Shuchi Gupta , Mariona Dalmases , Iacopo Torre , Gerasimos Konstantatos †,‡,*
PMCID: PMC7020105  PMID: 31934762

Abstract

graphic file with name nl9b04130_0004.jpg

Optical sensing in the mid- and long-wave infrared (MWIR, LWIR) is of paramount importance for a large spectrum of applications including environmental monitoring, gas sensing, hazard detection, food and product manufacturing inspection, and so forth. Yet, such applications to date are served by costly and complex epitaxially grown HgCdTe quantum-well and quantum-dot infrared photodetectors. The possibility of exploiting low-energy intraband transitions make colloidal quantum dots (CQD) an attractive low-cost alternative to expensive low bandgap materials for infrared applications. Unfortunately, fabrication of quantum dots exhibiting intraband absorption is technologically constrained by the requirement of controlled heavy doping, which has limited, so far, MWIR and LWIR CQD detectors to mercury-based materials. Here, we demonstrate intraband absorption and photodetection in heavily doped PbS colloidal quantum dots in the 5–9 μm range, beyond the PbS bulk band gap, with responsivities on the order of 10–4 A/W at 80 K. We have further developed a model based on quantum transport equations to understand the impact of electron population of the conduction band in the performance of intraband photodetectors and offer guidelines toward further performance improvement.

Keywords: Intraband absorption, lead sulfide, colloidal quantum dots, infrared photodetector, doping


Colloidal quantum dot (CQD) technology enables low-cost, flexible, and complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) compatible optoelectronics with spectral coverage tunable through the quantum confinement effect. These features have motivated extensive research toward CQD light-emitting diodes,1 solar cells,2 photodetectors,3 and field effect transistors.4 There is, however, a fundamental limitation in the band gap engineering of CQDs. The spectral coverage that can be reached by a CQD material is determined by the bulk band gap of the semiconductor compound. Quantum confinement can only increase the optical band gap of CQD semiconductor from a minimum value, given by the band gap of the respective bulk material. This condition restricts the number of potential applications for many CQD materials to the visible (vis), near-infrared (NIR), and short-wavelength infrared (SWIR) range of the electromagnetic spectrum. Thus, only semimetallic bulk materials or those with a very low bandgap (<0.4 eV) can potentially give rise to CQD optoelectronics in the mid- and long-wave infrared (MWIR and LWIR). A plausible way to bypass this limit is by leveraging intraband transitions in CQDs.5,6 Intraband absorption within the conduction band (CB) can occur when the confined ground state, 1Se, is populated with electrons.7,8 In this situation, electrons can be excited to higher energy states via absorption of photons with energy lower than the band gap. Analogous description holds for holes occupying the confined ground state of the valence band (VB), 1Sh.

CQDs exhibiting intraband optical coupling (absorption9 and luminescence10) can be a potential alternative to current high-cost MWIR/LWIR photodetectors and quantum cascade laser technologies based on epitaxially grown HgCdTe or III–V superlattices.11,12 Stable heavy doping of CQDs is required to achieve steady-state intraband absorption.6 This has been demonstrated in different materials using different doping methods (see ref (6) for a review). In particular, several groups have reported steady-state intraband absorption in lead chalcogenide (PbS, PbSe) CQDs in solution.1316 However, none of these approaches led to stable heavily doped solid-state films, and the report of Pb-chalcogenide CQDs for intraband optoelectronics has remained elusive. The first devices exploiting intraband transitions (MWIR photodetectors) have only recently been demonstrated using mercury chalcogenide nanocrystals.9,17,18 HgTe and HgSe being semimetals in their bulk form, allow access to the MWIR and LWIR through interband transitions in Hg-based CQDs.19 In this work, we demonstrate intraband absorption in PbS CQDs for photon energies down to 0.14 eV, well below the bulk bandgap of PbS (0.41 eV). In addition, we demonstrate photodetection in the 5–9 μm range, proving that this absorption process can be exploited in optoelectronic devices. Finally, we develop a quantum-transport model in order to evaluate the impact of the occupation of the 1Se state in the potential performance of intraband photodetectors.

We have achieved recently a method that achieves robust heavy doping in PbS CQDs,20 based on sulfur substitution by iodine via a simple ligand exchange procedure followed by infilling and capping via atomic layer deposition the CQD film with alumina. As sketched in Figure 1a, as-synthesized PbS CQDs exhibit low doping, and thus 1Sh is almost completely filled and 1Se is almost completely empty. Upon sulfur substitution by iodine, PbS dots are heavily doped n-type (see Figure S1) and 1Se is partially occupied. In ref (20), it was found that doping is more effective with increasing dot size because larger dots contain more exposed sulfur atoms in (100) facets. For dots with a diameter smaller than 4 nm, 1Se is almost empty. For larger dots, with diameter between 4 nm (exciton ∼1150 nm) and 8 nm (exciton ∼1850 nm), heavy doping is achieved and 1Se is partially populated. For dots with diameter larger than 8 nm, 1Se is nearly filled with ∼8 electrons per QD, corresponding to the 8-fold degeneracy of PbS QDs.21

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) (left) As-synthesized QDs have intrinsic low doping and exhibit filled 1Sh and empty 1Se. (right) Substitution of exposed sulfur atoms by iodine atoms leads to heavy n-type doping and a partially populated 1Se. (b) Transmission spectra of undoped (red) and doped (black) PbS CQD films. Spectra have been offset vertically for clarity. The insets illustrate interband (1Sh → 1Se) and intraband (1Se → 1Pe) absorption processes. (c) Transmission spectra of films of heavily doped PbS CQD with diameters ranging from 5.8 nm (bottom) to 8.0 nm (top). The central energy of the excitonic absorption for each QD size is indicated with a vertical red line. Red dotted Gaussian lines are guides to the eye representing the intraband absorption peak. (d) Intraband energy as a function of exciton energy in heavily doped PbS CQDs. Black crosses represent direct measurements of intraband transitions. Orange plus signs represent intraband energies obtained by measuring and subtracting the 2nd and 1st excitonic peaks.

In heavily doped QDs, filling of the CB results in bleaching of interband absorption. As a counterpart, intraband absorption is then possible.7,22 To demonstrate intraband absorption in PbS CQDs, we have synthesized QDs following reported methods and fabricated films (under ambient atmosphere) with an optimized procedure for exchanging the original oleate ligands with iodine (see Methods in Supporting Information). We have prepared films of doped and undoped PbS CQDs of different sizes for absorption measurements. It should be reminded here that with the employed method, heavy doping is only attained after infiltration and encapsulation of the iodine-exchanged film with alumina, because this removes oxygen adsorbates, present in the samples exposed to the atmosphere, that induce p-type doping.20 Therefore, hereafter, we will consider undoped films as those in which the original oleate ligands have been exchanged with iodine but are not encapsulated and doped films as those that have been adequately encapsulated with alumina.

Figure 1b shows transmission measurements of two iodine-exchanged PbS QD samples, one is heavily doped while the other is not. The undoped sample exhibits strong absorption at the interband (1Sh → 1Se) transition, as illustrated in the top-right inset. In the doped sample, the exciton peak (∼0.786 eV) is partially bleached and a strong intraband absorption peak (∼0.191 eV) appears because of the partial population of 1Se, as illustrated in the bottom-left inset. Transmission measurements performed on PbS films exchanged with thiol ligands, instead of iodine, and encapsulated with alumina do not show exciton bleach or intraband absorption (Figure S2), further supporting the dopant role of iodine demonstrated in ref (20).

Intraband transition redshifts with increasing dot size, resulting from a progressive relaxation in the charge confinement (Figure 1c). By tuning the size of the dots, we demonstrate intraband absorption in the 6–9 μm range, as indicated by Gaussian fittings (red dotted lines). Beyond 10 μm, alumina has some contribution to the absorption (see Figure S3). Note as well the progressive disappearance of the interband peak (left side of the panel) as the dot size increases, resulting from an increasing population of the CB.

Figure 1d shows the intraband transition energy of doped PbS CQDs versus their exciton energy. The intraband transitions measured span from 0.14 to 0.20 eV. These energies have been obtained from absorption measurements in two different ways, as sketched in the bottom-right inset: (I) fitting direct intraband (1Se → 1Pe) transitions (black crosses); and (II) by fitting and subtracting the 1Sh → 1Pe and 1Sh → 1Se transition energies (orange plus signs). The latter method is supported by the fact that parity selection rules are relaxed in PbS QDs, allowing the otherwise forbidden 1Sh → 1Pe transition.23,24 Both methods give similar results, thus confirming the intraband nature of the low-energy absorption of our QDs. Examples of the fits are shown in Figure S4.

Our doping method was previously proven to be robust with time (>2 months).20 Robustness with temperature is also of paramount importance for optoelectronic applications in the mid- and long-wave infrared. In particular, some applications such as infrared photodetection require low temperatures to achieve the highest performance.11 We define nQD as the doping level of the CQD film, measured in electrons per QD (e/QD). Figure 2a shows the dependence of the doping level with temperature in two PbS QDs samples. The doping level was obtained from field effect transistor (FET) measurements (see Figure S5), following the method described in ref (20). Figure 2a demonstrates that the efficacy of the employed doping method is weakly dependent on temperature in the 80–300 K range. Consequently, intraband absorption is still accessible at low temperatures (see Figure 2b and Figure S6) enabling therefore the development of intraband PbS CQD photodetectors. We have thus fabricated interdigitated-electrode devices (see Figure 2c) for photoconductivity measurements. Devices were fabricated on transparent CaF2 substrates to avoid sample heating due to parasitic absorption in the substrate. Figure 2d plots the intraband quantum efficiency, QE, spectra of devices measured under monochromatic light at 80 K. The vertical dashed lines indicate the bandgap of bulk PbS at 80K (∼3.7 μm).25 Our measurements demonstrate intraband photodetection in the 5–9 μm range (MWIR and LWIR), thus breaking the limit set by the band gap value of the bulk in CQD optoelectronics. Beyond 9 μm, the light power density reaching the sample was too low to produce a measurable signal.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) Effect of temperature on the doping level of PbS CQD films for three different sizes of QDs. (b) Absorption spectra, measured at 80 K, of three doped PbS CQD films with PbS of different sizes. (c) Sketch of the interdigitated devices used for photoconductivity measurements. (d) Photodetection quantum efficiency of devices using the same dots as in (c). The applied biases, Vbias, were 1, 5 and 1.6 V, from top to bottom. The chopping frequency of the excitation light, fc, was 11 Hz in all cases. Gaussian fittings (dashed) are superimposed to the measured data. Vertical dashed lines indicate the band gap wavelength of bulk PbS, λbulk, at 80 K.

Measurements of the dependence of the photocurrent with the modulation frequency (see Figure S7) indicate that both intraband and interband detection are slow: >30 and >200 ms, respectively. We have measured the specific detectivity, D*, of our devices (see Methods in Supporting Information). At 80 K and 11 Hz, we have obtained peak responsivities and detectivities of 1.5 × 10–4 AW–1 and 4 × 104 Jones at 6.8 μm; 1.1 × 10–4 AW–1 and 8 × 104 Jones at 7.3 μm; and 1.3 × 10–4 AW–1 and 4 × 104 Jones at 8.0 μm, for top, middle, and bottom panels of Figure 2d, respectively. Correcting by the shadowing factor of the interdigitated electrodes (∼50%) and the reflectivity of the PbS layer would give rise to internal detectivity values on the order of 105 Jones. While our detectors yield similar responsivity values with the first reported HgSe CQD intraband photodetectors,9 the detectivity of our devices is currently inferior to state-of-the-art mercury-based devices.26 The performance of our devices is largely limited by high noise due to the large dark current. The high doping levels of our CQD films enable intraband absorption but at the same time result in high conductivities (see Figure S5 and ref (20)) and hence dark currents. Therefore, it would be useful to evaluate the impact of electron population on the performance of our PbS CQD photodetectors.

The occupancy factor of 1Se has a strong impact in the conductance of CQD films.27,28 Reference (29) analyzes the performance of quantum-dot infrared photodetectors (QDIP) as a function of the doping level, suggesting that minimum dark current and best performance occur for a doping level equal to the degeneracy of 1Se (included spin). This work considers QDs epitaxially grown within a matrix of higher bandgap, which acts as a barrier. In that case, transport only occurs through the barrier and not through 1Se states. In a CQD film, however, transport between dots can take place through 1Se as well as, in principle, through 1Pe, as sketched in Figure 3a. To shed further insights on the performance potential of intraband CQDs photodetectors, we have developed a simple transport model for doped CQD films, based on quantum transport equations. The model does not aim to obtain quantitative values of performance but rather to qualitatively assess the role of doping on some basic photodetector figures of merit. It is noteworthy that at this level the effects of doping on the lifetime of carriers in higher excited states as well as potential secondary effects on the mobility via carrier–carrier scattering are not taken into account. It evaluates, as a function of nQD, (I) the steady-state conductance under a given applied bias prior to illumination, ; and (II) the change in conductance, ΔG, caused by intraband absorption in the QDs. The ratio ΔG/ will provide a qualitative indication of the potential detectivity of our devices, since detectivity is proportional to ΔG and inversely proportional to the noise, which in turn increases with . The starting point of our model is the linear response formula of conductivity (G) at finite temperatures30 given by eq 1

graphic file with name nl9b04130_m001.jpg 1

where Inline graphic is the conductance quantum, e is the elementary charge, h is Planck’s constant, Inline graphic is the product of the number of propagating modes, and the electron transmission probability per mode

graphic file with name nl9b04130_m004.jpg 2

is the Fermi function and determines the electron occupancy factor (from 0 to 1) at levels of energy E, EF is the Fermi energy, and kB is Boltzmann constant. The details and development of the model are included in the Supporting Information. The main result of the model is eq 3:

graphic file with name nl9b04130_m005.jpg 3

where 8 represents the degeneracy of 1Se, and a and b are parameters that depend on the intensity of the infrared illumination and the degeneracy of 1Se and 1Pe. Equation 3 indicates that the highest possible occupation of 1Se is required in order to achieve high detectivity, as it is the case for QDIPs. This is so because noise (related to ) decreases and responsivity (related to ΔG) increases for high values of nQD, as illustrated in Figure 3b,c. Our results suggest that the low detectivity measured in our devices can be largely due to the fact that 1Se is not completely filled, therefore pointing toward further research to maximize the doping density closer to the state degeneracy value.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) Scheme of the QD transport model for two adjacent QDs. G, GS, and GP are total conductance, conductance through 1Se channels, and conductance through 1Pe channels, respectively. (b) Modeled normalized steady-state conductance, , of a PbS CQD film as a function of the doping level nQD. (c) Left axis, broken line: modeled increase in conductance, ΔG, due to intraband light absorption. Right axis, solid line: modeled photodetection performance, expressed as Δ, as a function of nQD. The insets in (b,c) illustrate the impact of the doping in the population of 1Se and, therefore, in the value of and Δ.

In summary, we have demonstrated intraband absorption and photodetection in robust heavily doped PbS CQD solid state films. Because of the relative large bandgap of the PbS bulk crystal, intraband absorption in PbS CQDs can access ranges of the spectrum that are unattainable by interband transitions. This bandgap modulation strategy further expands the solution-processed material availability toward the MWIR and LWIR for sensing and light emission applications. The size-tunable spectral line width of intraband transitions employed here taken together with the facile integration of CQDs of different sizes may lead to CMOS compatible low-cost multispectral imaging systems in the infrared.

During the revision process of the present manuscript, Law et al. have demonstrated the rise of intraband absorption in PbSe QD superlattices following halide exchange and Al2O3 infilling with ALD,31 corroborating the findings of our work and demonstrating the applicability of this process to lead chalcogenide QDs. The efficacy of the doping method employed herein is limited by the amount of exposed sulfur, imposed by the size of the nanocrystal. It would be desirable to circumvent this limitation so that intraband absorption can be enabled even in smaller dots. To this end, we speculate that a postsynthesis sulfur (or another chalcogen) treatment could increase the amount of anions available for substitution even at smaller QDs. Alternatively, the use of halide ions in situ during the growth of QDs could potentially circumvent the need for exposed 001 facets for the substitution to take place.

Acknowledgments

I.R. acknowledges support from the Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad of Spain via a Juan de la Cierva fellowship. The authors acknowledge financial support from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant Agreement 725165), the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO), and the “Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional” (FEDER) through Grant TEC2017-88655-R. The authors also acknowledge financial support from Fundacio Privada Cellex, the program CERCA and from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, through the “Severo Ochoa” Programme for Centres of Excellence in R&D (SEV-2015-0522). S.C. acknowledge support from a Marie Curie Standard European Fellowship (“NAROBAND”, H2020-MSCA-IF-2016-750600).

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04130.

  • Methods, absorption measurements, FET measurements, intraband photocurrent at different excitation frequencies, and transport model (PDF)

Author Present Address

(I.R.) Instituto de Energía Solar, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Avda. Complutense 30, 28040, Madrid, Spain.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

nl9b04130_si_001.pdf (781.1KB, pdf)

References

  1. Shirasaki Y.; Supran G. J.; Bawendi M. G.; Bulović V. Emergence of Colloidal Quantum-Dot Light-Emitting Technologies. Nat. Photonics 2013, 7 (1), 13–23. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.328. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carey G. H.; Abdelhady A. L.; Ning Z.; Thon S. M.; Bakr O. M.; Sargent E. H. Colloidal Quantum Dot Solar Cells. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115 (23), 12732–12763. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Konstantatos G.; Sargent E. H. Colloidal Quantum Dot Photodetectors. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2011, 54 (3), 278–282. 10.1016/j.infrared.2010.12.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hetsch F.; Zhao N.; Kershaw S. V.; Rogach A. L. Quantum Dot Field Effect Transistors. Mater. Today 2013, 16 (9), 312–325. 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.08.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jagtap A.; Livache C.; Martinez B.; Qu J.; Chu A.; Gréboval C.; Goubet N.; Lhuillier E. Emergence of Intraband Transitions in Colloidal Nanocrystals [Invited]. Opt. Mater. Express 2018, 8 (5), 1174. 10.1364/OME.8.001174. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kim J.; Choi D.; Jeong K. S. Self-Doped Colloidal Semiconductor Nanocrystals with Intraband Transitions in Steady State. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54 (61), 8435–8445. 10.1039/C8CC02488J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Shim M.; Guyot-Sionnest P. N-Type Colloidal Semiconductor Nanocrystals. Nature 2000, 407 (6807), 981–983. 10.1038/35039577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang C.; Shim M.; Guyot-Sionnest P. Electrochromic Nanocrystal Quantum Dots. Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 2001, 291 (5512), 2390–2392. 10.1126/science.291.5512.2390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Deng Z.; Jeong K. S.; Guyot-Sionnest P. Colloidal Quantum Dots Intraband Photodetectors. ACS Nano 2014, 8 (11), 11707–11714. 10.1021/nn505092a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Deng Z.; Guyot-Sionnest P. Intraband Luminescence from HgSe/CdS Core/Shell Quantum Dots. ACS Nano 2016, 10 (2), 2121–2127. 10.1021/acsnano.5b06527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Martyniuk P.; Rogalski A. Quantum-Dot Infrared Photodetectors: Status and Outlook. Prog. Quantum Electron. 2008, 32 (3), 89–120. 10.1016/j.pquantelec.2008.07.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gmachl C.; Capasso F.; Sivco D. L.; Cho A. Y. Recent Progress in Quantum Cascade Lasers and Applications. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2001, 64 (11), 1533–1601. 10.1088/0034-4885/64/11/204. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Koh W. K.; Koposov A. Y.; Stewart J. T.; Pal B. N.; Robel I.; Pietryga J. M.; Klimov V. I. Heavily Doped N-Type PbSe and PbS Nanocrystals Using Ground-State Charge Transfer from Cobaltocene. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3 (1), 2004. 10.1038/srep02004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lu H.; Carroll G. M.; Chen X.; Amarasinghe D. K.; Neale N. R.; Miller E. M.; Sercel P. C.; Rabuffetti F. A.; Efros A. L.; Beard M. C. N -Type PbSe Quantum Dots via Post-Synthetic Indium Doping. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (42), 13753–13763. 10.1021/jacs.8b07910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kroupa D. M.; Hughes B. K.; Miller E. M.; Moore D. T.; Anderson N. C.; Chernomordik B. D.; Nozik A. J.; Beard M. C. Synthesis and Spectroscopy of Silver-Doped PbSe Quantum Dots. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (30), 10382–10394. 10.1021/jacs.7b04551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Araujo J. J.; Brozek C. K.; Kroupa D. M.; Gamelin D. R. Degenerately N-Doped Colloidal PbSe Quantum Dots: Band Assignments and Electrostatic Effects. Nano Lett. 2018, 18 (6), 3893–3900. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Goubet N.; Livache C.; Martinez B.; Xu X. Z.; Ithurria S.; Royer S.; Cruguel H.; Patriarche G.; Ouerghi A.; Silly M.; et al. Wave-Function Engineering in HgSe/HgTe Colloidal Heterostructures to Enhance Mid-Infrared Photoconductive Properties. Nano Lett. 2018, 18 (7), 4590–4597. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lhuillier E.; Scarafagio M.; Hease P.; Nadal B.; Aubin H.; Xu X. Z.; Lequeux N.; Patriarche G.; Ithurria S.; Dubertret B. Infrared Photodetection Based on Colloidal Quantum-Dot Films with High Mobility and Optical Absorption up to THz. Nano Lett. 2016, 16 (2), 1282–1286. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Keuleyan S. E.; Guyot-Sionnest P.; Delerue C.; Allan G. Mercury Telluride Colloidal Quantum Dots: Electronic Structure, Size-Dependent Spectra, and Photocurrent Detection up to 12 Mm. ACS Nano 2014, 8 (8), 8676–8682. 10.1021/nn503805h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Christodoulou S.; Ramiro I.; Othonos A.; Figueroba A.; Dalmases M.; Özdemir O.; Pradhan S.; Itskos G.; Konstantatos G.. Single-Exciton Gain and Stimulated Emission Across the Infrared Optical Telecom Band from Robust Heavily-Doped PbS Colloidal Quantum Dots. 2019, arXiv:1908.03796 [physics.app-ph]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kang I.; Wise F. W. Electronic Structure and Optical Properties of PbS and PbSe Quantum Dots. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1997, 14 (7), 1632. 10.1364/JOSAB.14.001632. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schimpf A. M.; Knowles K. E.; Carroll G. M.; Gamelin D. R. Electronic Doping and Redox-Potential Tuning in Colloidal Semiconductor Nanocrystals. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48 (7), 1929–1937. 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Diaconescu B.; Padilha L. A.; Nagpal P.; Swartzentruber B. S.; Klimov V. I. Measurement of Electronic States of PbS Nanocrystal Quantum Dots Using Scanning Tunneling Spectroscopy: The Role of Parity Selection Rules in Optical Absorption. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 110 (12), 127406. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.127406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nootz G.; Padilha L. A.; Olszak P. D.; Webster S.; Hagan D. J.; Van Stryland E. W.; Levina L.; Sukhovatkin V.; Brzozowski L.; Sargent E. H. Role of Symmetry Breaking on the Optical Transitions in Lead-Salt Quantum Dots. Nano Lett. 2010, 10 (9), 3577–3582. 10.1021/nl1018673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gibbs Z. M.; Kim H.; Wang H.; White R. L.; Drymiotis F.; Kaviany M.; Jeffrey Snyder G. Temperature Dependent Band Gap in PbX (X = = S, Se, Te). Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103 (26), 262109. 10.1063/1.4858195. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Livache C.; Martinez B.; Goubet N.; Gréboval C.; Qu J.; Chu A.; Royer S.; Ithurria S.; Silly M. G.; Dubertret B.; et al. A Colloidal Quantum Dot Infrared Photodetector and Its Use for Intraband Detection. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10 (1), 2125. 10.1038/s41467-019-10170-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Guyot-Sionnest P. Electrical Transport in Colloidal Quantum Dot Films. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3 (9), 1169–1175. 10.1021/jz300048y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Vanmaekelbergh D.; Liljeroth P. Electron-Conducting Quantum Dot Solids: Novel Materials Based on Colloidal Semiconductor Nanocrystals. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005, 34 (4), 299–312. 10.1039/b314945p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Phillips J. Evaluation of the Fundamental Properties of Quantum Dot Infrared Detectors. J. Appl. Phys. 2002, 91 (7), 4590–4594. 10.1063/1.1455130. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Datta S.Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems; Cambridge University Press, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  31. Abelson A.; Qian C.; Salk T.; Luan Z.; Fu K.; Zheng J. G.; Wardini J. L.; Law M. Collective Topo-Epitaxy in the Self-Assembly of a 3D Quantum Dot Superlattice. Nat. Mater. 2020, 19, 49. 10.1038/s41563-019-0485-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

nl9b04130_si_001.pdf (781.1KB, pdf)

Articles from Nano Letters are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES