Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Feb 14;15(2):e0228927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228927

National TB program shortages as potential factor for poor-quality TB care cascade: Healthcare workers’ perspective from Beira, Mozambique

Miguelhete Lisboa 1,2,*, Inês Fronteira 2, Paul H Mason 3, Maria do Rosário O Martins 2
Editor: Frederick Quinn4
PMCID: PMC7021283  PMID: 32059032

Abstract

Background

Mozambique is one of the countries with the deadly implementation gaps in the tuberculosis (TB) care and services delivery. In-hospital delays in TB diagnosis and treatment, transmission and mortality still persist, in part, due to poor-quality of TB care cascade.

Objective

We aimed to assess, from the healthcare workers’ (HCW) perspective, factors associated with poor-quality TB care cascade and explore local sustainable suggestions to improve in-hospital TB management.

Methods

In-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with different categories of HCW. Audio-recording and written notes were taken, and content analysis was performed through atlas.ti7.

Results

Bottlenecks within hospital TB care cascade, lack of TB staff and task shifting, centralized and limited time of TB laboratory services, and fear of healthcare workers getting infected by TB were mentioned to be the main factors associated with implementation gaps. Interviewees believe that task shifting from nurses to hospital auxiliary workers, and from higher and well-trained to lower HCW are accepted and feasible. The expansion and use of molecular TB diagnostic tools are seen by the interviewees as a proper way to fight effectively against both sensitive and MDR TB. Ensuring provision of N95 respiratory masks is believed to be an essential requirement for effective engagement of the HCW on high-quality in-hospital TB care. For monitoring and evaluation, TB quality improvement teams in each health facility are considered to be an added value.

Conclusion

Shortage of resources within the national TB control programme is one of the potential factors for poor-quality of the TB care cascade. Task shifting of TB care and services delivery, decentralization of the molecular TB diagnostic tools, and regular provision of N95 respiratory masks should contribute not just to reduce the impact of resource scarceness, but also to ensure proper TB diagnosis and treatment to both sensitive and MDR TB.

Introduction

One of the main tuberculosis (TB) reduction strategies is the early detection and rapid administration of proper anti-TB treatment [12]. Studies in multiple African countries have shown that diagnostic and treatment delays persist, in part, due to healthcare system or in-ward delays related to the shortage of resources, particularly the well-trained healthcare workers (HCW) and molecular diagnostic tools within the peripheral health facilities [34].

The implementation of the national policies on TB infection control (TBIC) measures in healthcare facilities is seen to be a specific matter for healthcare workers, particularly for the nurses [5], however, nurses are overwhelmed in Mozambique, as the country´s nurse to population ratio is about 2.9 per 10 000 inhabitants. In addition, there is still shortage of medical doctors and well-trained laboratory technicians (superior level), as the population ratio is about 0.5 and 0.3 per 10 000 inhabitants, respectively [6].

In-hospital delays of TB diagnosis and treatment, transmission and mortality persist around the country, in part, due to poor-quality of TB care cascade [79]. Shortage of resources seems to hinder the local authority commitment on reduction of delays in TB diagnosis and treatment, morbidity and mortality [810].

Task shifting to tackle health worker shortages in the context of the HIV epidemic, aiming to strengthen and expand the health workforce was endorsed by world health organization [11] and is a well-known, cost-effective strategy, also approved and recommended by Mozambique ministry of health [12]. However, little is known about the task shifting of TB services delivery to tackle the human resource crisis in the face of the TB and emerging epidemic of multidrug resistant (MDR) TB.

Investiment in molecular TB diagnostic tools to the district level is still delayed, as most of health facilities are still using acid-fast bacilli smear microscopy as their first tool for TB diagnosis, despite the emerging epidemic of MDR TB. TB care and services (laboratories and treatment centres) are only available 8 hours per day and none at all, during weekend and holidays [8]. In addition, within the Mozambique Ministry of Health, there is not any reliable transport network for clinical specimens, including sputum samples, from the peripheral health facilities to the TB laboratory with molecular diagnostic tools, most of them located at district or provincial levels.

This study was carried out to assess, from the healthcare workers’ perspective, the factors associated with in-hospital poor-quality TB care cascade and explore local sustainable suggestions to improve in-hospital TB care services.

Material and methods

Study design, population and sample

This was a cross-sectional qualitative study [13] conducted from January to February 2019.

The target population was the health staff from the Beira Central Hospital dealing with TB matters. Therefore, there were a total of 71 healthcare workers including managers and decision-makers. Among them, there were 11 medical doctors, 16 nurses, 13 laboratory technicians and 31 hospital auxiliary workers. We used a convenience sampling approach to select our sample [13]. The selected categories of health workers represent the full range of healthcare staff with different levels of training and experience in relation to TB. They also had different responsibilities and possibly had different perceptions and practices related to TB diagnosis, treatment and infection control measures within the central hospital.

Our sample was purposively only made of staff working in the medical wards and TB laboratory, hence, 20 hospital auxiliary workers, 10 nurses, 5 medical doctors, 9 TB laboratory technicians. Additionally, 7 managers and 3 hospital decision-makers were also selected and asked to participate in the focus group discussions (FGD) and individual in-depth interviews (IDI).

Study setting, TB diagnosis and treatment capabilities

The study was carried out in Beira Central Hospital. Beira city (the capital of Sofala province) is located in the central region of Mozambique (about 1,200 km northern of Maputo, the capital city of Mozambique). Beira is the second largest city in Mozambique with a population estimated in about 463,442 inhabitants in 2017. The TB incidence rate (659/100,000 inhabitants) and TB/HIV co-infection rate (about 63%) in Beira city are above the national average [14].

The Beira Central Hospital, a quaternary level health facility, is a referral facility for 3 provinces and partly for Northern region of Inhambane province. This hospital is equipped with high skilled personal (Infectious Disease Doctor, Pulmonologists, Laboratory Technicians, Imagiologist, etc.) and TB laboratory technology, including GeneXpert MTB/Rifampicin, culture and drug sensitivity testing in TB and, where most of TB suspected patients from these provinces are referred to and diagnosed. The Beira Central Hospital has 4 medical wards with approximately 250 beds and 1 separate TB ward with about 34 beds [14].

Data collection and procedures

FGD were used to assess a broad range of views about TB within medical wards from auxiliary workers, nurses and TB laboratory technicians. IDI were used to address individual experiences or feelings from those very busy staff like medical doctors, managers and hospital decision-makers. The FGD and IDI guides were previously discussed with Infectious Disease Doctor, TB and Laboratory Experts, piloted and approved for its use.

There were two FGD with auxiliary workers (10 females and 10 males), one with nurses (5 females and 5 males), and one with TB laboratory technicians (4 femeles and 5 males). We conducted fifteen IDI with five medical doctors, seven managers and three hospital decision-makers. All FGD and IDI were carried out in Portuguese.

The FGD and IDI were held in the meeting room and individual offices respectively, depending on the availability of the health-care workers. During the FGD, one moderator led each discussion using a standard guide and two investigators were observing and taking notes from the discussion. For IDI, one moderator led the sessions and one investigator observed and took notes during the interviews. The moderator and observers were the same in all FGD and IDI. Each FGD and IDI was conducted in an average time of 80 and 60 minutes, respectively.

In undertaking the FGD and IDI sessions digital recordings were done. A guide was used containing the following areas: general situation of nosocomial TB, in-hospital TB care cascade gaps, probable factors associated with in-hospital delayed TB diagnosis and treatment, acceptability of auxiliary workers and 24-hour TB services and, what should be done to ensure feasibility of these last two approaches.

After finishing each FGD, the study team discussed the points as a way of preparing for the forthcoming discussions. Data were processed on a daily basis, immediately after the FGD or IDI. There was no need to change the FGD and IDI guide.

Data analysis

Discussions and interviews were transcribed verbatim. After transcription, content analysis using inductive analysis [13] initially consisted of the identification of transcripts that were linked to the objectives of the study, preparation of analysis codes, transcript text encoding and analysis between the codes. Then, the study team again discussed all codes and agreed the final code for the encoding and the final analysis. Code group in comprehensive themes representing the contents of the objectives (the factors associated with in-hospital poor-quality TB care cascade and explore local sustainable suggestions to improve in-hospital TB care services) was conducted subsequently.

Finally, relationships between topics using the technique of examination and re-examination of the relevant parts were established. Quotes that represented the emerging themes were selected for inclusion in the manuscript.

Atlas-ti version 7 for Windows was used to facilitate the search, classification and organization of the data.

Ethical statement

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Bioethics Committee for Health of the National Institute of Health of Mozambique and by WHO Ethics Review Committee. The Mozambique Ministry of Health, the Sofala Provincial Health and Beira Central Hospital authorities provided administrative approval. After an introduction of the participants, researchers and the objectives of the study, written informed consent procedures were ensured. Therefore, all participants signed an informed consent form. Participants were allowed to decline to take part of the FGD or IDI. To ensure that every healthcare worker had the opportunity to contribute freely in the FGD, the groups were homogeneous in terms of responsibilities.

The anonymity of the participants was guaranteed by their identification with the initial letters of their professional category followed by the numeral, according to the chronological order of the interviews or sitting position during the focus discussion groups, for example, MD1 (Medical Doctor 1), DM3 (Decision-Maker 3), AW5 (Auxiliary Worker 5), M3 (Manager 3), LT9 (Laboratory Technicians 9), and so on.

Results

Sociodemographic attributes of the respondents

A total 54 key informants were purposively selected and volunteered to participate. Fifteen participated in IDI and 39 in FGD. From the total, 52% (n = 54) were male, the mean (±SD) age was 34 (±7) years and 68.5% of the participants had more than four years working experience in TB matters—Table 1.

Table 1. Sociodemographic attributes of the respondents from Beira, Mozambique, 2019.

Characteristics Number Percentage (%)
Sex
Male 28 51.9
Female 26 48.1
Age groups
24–35 years old 33 61.1
36–45 years old 17 31.5
46–55 years old 4 7.4
Profession / responsability
Physician (decision-maker) 3 5.6
Physician (ward assistant) 5 9.3
Nurse (ward officer) 5 9.3
Nurse (ward assistant) 10 18.5
Laboratory technician (officer) 2 3.7
Laboratory technician (assistant) 9 16.7
Auxiliary worker 20 37.0
Professional experience on TB matters (years)
1–3 years 17 31.5
4–6 years 24 44.4
≥ 7 years 13 24.1

Main themes emerged

The agreed emerged themes were in-hospital TB care cascade gaps, lack of TB staff and task shifting, centralized and limited time of TB laboratory services and fear of healthcare workers getting infected by TB.

In-hospital TB care cascade gaps

From suspected TB patient admission to the treatment initiation, according to interviewees, there are four mandatory steps. These steps and its related factors are possible TB care cascade gaps that may contribute to increased in-hospital delays to TB diagnosis and treatment, onward TB transmission and TB mortality in the Beira Central Hospital–Fig 1.

Fig 1. Current steps and perceived factors associated with in-hospital delays to TB diagnostic and treatment in Beira, Mozambique, 2019.

Fig 1

Additionally, the TB care cascade is getting worse as there is a lack of motivated TB taskforce responsible for organizing and coordinating regular discussion of TB data, supervision, monitoring and evaluation of the TB activities within the health facilities.

Lack of staff and task shifting

Interviewees were first asked to identify which category of the health workers should be considered for task shifting of TB care provision and what needs to be done. Almost all respondents (n = 51) indicated that staff shortage, particularly of nurses, is negatively impacting the quality of the TB care delivery. Therefore, as opposed to an in-ward nurse, in-hospital expedition of TB related issues could best be acceptable if hospital auxiliary workers are carefully selected, trained and assigned to logistic and operational issues in relation to sputum collection from medical ward to TB laboratory, and examination results collection from TB laboratory to medical doctors or any other trained staff for early TB treatment initiation, TB patient isolation and education.

The task shifting was also suggested from higher-trained professionals (ID doctors, Pneumologist doctors, etc) to lower-trained workers (technicians of medicine, laboratory, nursing, etc) specially those working at peripheral health facilities.

As five out of seven managers during a focus group also supported engagement and task shifting from nurses to hospital auxiliary workers. This is illustrated by the speech of one of the interviewees—a manager during a focus group discussion:

Auxiliary workers have always been involved in sputum sample collection and sending to the TB laboratory (…), however, they are not seriously assigned to this task and they don´t feel as their own responsibility (…). What should be done is to select, train, engage on TB matters as expediter and supervise them. To ensure supervion, every health facility should have a high-quality TB care committee and regular coordination/discussion and evaluation meetings (…)

(M2).

In addition, all medical doctors, during an interview, have supported the need of training the TB front line staff, particularly at peripheral health facilities and district levels, on proper management of multidrug resistant TB. One of the medical doctors stated:

(…) TB cases are everywherewe and effective management is lacking due to the shortage of well-trained health workers on TB matters, especially when multidrug resistant (MDR) TB is suspected/diagnosed at district or peripheral levels (…), task shifting from medical doctors to lower health workers for high-quality TB care at rural areas is urgent to overcome the challenges of the MDR TB management

(MD3).

Centralized and limited time of TB laboratory services

Due to shortage of laboratory technicians there is a lack of availability of TB services compared to other clinical services, which was emphasised as an important factor affecting negatively the early diagnostic and treatment of TB in Beira. Thus, the respondents believe that the lack of 24-hour TB laboratory services provision seems to contribute to underutilisation of the scarceness molecular diagnostic tools and lately, on delay in TB diagnosis and treatment initiation.

Importantly, beside the resource constrainsts, the current centralized molecular diagnostic tools (e.g. GeneXpert) approach was mentioned to be one of the most potential shortcomings, as the first door of entrance of the most of patients is at peripheral level, within the primary healthcare, decentalization of the molecular diagnostic tools are seen to be urgent.

This finding shortfall was raised as a concern by almost all participants (n = 38) during all focus groups and in most of the interviews (n = 12) as illustrated by the following interviews of a physician:

As a national routine, during working-days, TB laboratories are open from 7:30 AM, and close at 3:30 PM, but sputum sample delivery to the TB laboratory ends at 9:00 AM every day. Additionally, sputum sample examination is not performed on weekend or (inter)national holidays. How can we reduce nosocomial TB or in-hospital TB mortality?

(MD4).

All laboratory technicians during a focus group also emphasized the following after a laboratory techinician said:

We are happy to guarantee 24-hour TB laboratory services, but it would be necessary to install a micro-TB laboratory in the emergency department and train the lower laboratory technician to use the rapid molecular diagnostic tools (Xpert). (…) working on shift/schedule basis, we should overcome the period of time that TB laboratory is closed and Xpert is underused

(LT9).

In addition, a decision-maker during an interview stated:

(…) ideally, every districts and/or peripheral health facilities should be equipped with Xpert machine and its 24-hours availability for early and proper TB diagnosis and treatment. Old TB diagnostic tools (microscopes) are not helping anymore as most of TB cases are HIV co-infected or are drug resistant TB, which is not diagnosed through acid-fast bacilli smear microscopy

(DM2).

Fear of healthcare workers getting infected by TB

Interviewees said that the poor-quality of TB care delivery and associated in-hospital TB delays seem to be also due to fear of healthcare workers getting infected by TB, poor motivation, lack of supervision to perform their normal duties on TB services swiftly. Frequent stockout of N95 respiratory masks and irregular provision of them to the healthcare workers, particularly for the front-line TB staff, is believed to be one of the causes of in-hospital TB delays at Beira central hospital. Therefore, healthcare workers may neglect to be in contact or managing TB patient due to fear of getting infected by TB.

A general practicioner during an interview stated:

(…) Very importantly, regular provision of N95 masks is an essential condition to motivate HCW to be in closer contact with the TB patients and to work willingly, overcoming the fear of contamination (…)

(MD2).

On the other hand, an auxiliary worker (with strong support from other auxiliary workers) during a focus group discussion said:

(…) we have learnt from several trainings and now not looking after in good manner the TB patients as just we´re protecting ourselves… (…) we are ready to keep much more attention and seriously the TB logistic and operational issues, if the hospital directorate provides the N95 masks and gloves for our own protection

(HAW7).

Discussion

The study results suggested that task shifting of in-hospital TB services delivery from nurses to hospital auxiliary workers, especially for expedition of the TB diagnosis and treatment matters, is acceptable and feasible approach. Interviewees believed that hospital auxiliary workers should sustainably ensure that sputum sample is promptly collected and delivered to TB laboratories, smear microscopy and/or Xpert assay results are collected from TB laboratories and delivered to physicians, proper treatment is started immediately and, infectious pulmonary TB patients are isolated as soon as the diagnosis is made. In addition, task shifting was mentioned from the TB management perspective, meaning to higher professionals to lower healthcare workers.

This result is completely a new finding as the implementation of the TB infection control (TBIC) measures in healthcare facilities is seen to be a specific matter for healthcare workers, particularly for nurses [5]. Unfortunately, the nurses and medical doctors in Mozambique are overwhelmed [6]. Therefore, considering task shifting from nurses to hospital auxiliary workers on the logistic and operationalization of TB diagnosis and treatment, and to many lower technicians (laboratory, medicine, nurses) for proper TB management at peripheral level, should be one of the strategies to strenghthen the in-hospital quality of TB care cascade. In addition, having a high-quality TB service delivery committee in every health facility, to train, supervise, monitor and evaluate the process of task shifting should be an addition value to be considered.

The study results also demonstrated that interviewees are aware of the inefficiency of acid-fast bacilli smear microscopy as the first-choice diagnostic tool, and the centralized and limited time of the TB laboratory services. Therefore, the interviewees believe that having a TB laboratory with molecular TB diagnostic tool within the emergency department but also decentralizing the molecular diagnostic tools, task shifting from higher to lower laboratory technicians, and ensuring 24-hours work-shift, should reduce the current TB care cascade gaps and associated in-hospital TB delays due to TB laboratory operational delays.

This finding is in line with the streamlined TB diagnosis and treatment initiation strategy implemented in the peripheal health facilities in Uganda [15], the implementation of GenoType MTBDRplus at Brewelskloof hospital in South Africa [16], and the implementation of refocused, intensified, administrative tuberculosis transmission control strategy using molecular diagnostic tools in TB hospitals in Russia and Bangladesh [5], not only to speed up the diagnosis and treatment of both, sensitive to and MDR TB, but also to strenghthen the implementation of the TBIC measures within health facilities toward to zero nosocomial TB transmission.

From the decentralization of molecular diagnostic tools (from provincial to peripheral health facilities level) point of view, has been analysed and considered to be cost-effective and likely to ensure high-quality TB care cascade, particularly in settings where TB morbimortality due to TB delays, and rates of lost to follow are high, [17] like Mozambique.

One of the study results was also the clear demonstration of assumed negligence from all categories of the healthcare workers on proper management of TB patients due to fear of being infected resulting from a lack of provision of N95 respiratory masks, despite of TB infection prevention and control trainings received.

These findings are similar to those described by Brouwer et al [18] and Engelbrecht et al [19] in terms of the relationship between shortage of the N95 respiratory masks and lack of provision of compassionate and high-quality TB care from the healthcare workers.

It suggests that training only healthcare workers and having guidelines is not enough to have the TB infection prevention and control measures under proper implementation. Therefore, if TB care cascade is to be improved within the health facilities, national TB program should also prioritize in solving the shortages within the TB care cascade, particularly ensuring availability of personal respiratory protection.

This study has several limitations: first, the external validity might be affected by its cross-sectional analysis, relatively small sample size and its conduction only in health facility of quaternary level and; second, qualitative analysis approach may have resulted in sections of data being misinterpreted due to thematic aggregation or due to the tendency for certain types of socially acceptable opinion to emerge, and for certain types of participant to dominate the research process, despite measures were taken by separating socio-professional categories, selection and involvement of skilled moderators. However, the results of this study may be applied to similar settings.

Conclusion

Programatic manageable shortages within the national TB program still remain as one of the potential factors for poor-quality of the TB care cascade. Therefore, strenghthening the national TB program should be prioritized. Task shifting of in-hospital TB services delivery from nurses to hospital auxiliary workers, and to lower many technicians are accepted and feasible. Ensuring 24-hours molecular TB diagnostic tools or at least decentralizing them should contribute not just to reduce TB delays, but also to ensure proper TB treatment to both sensitive and MDR TB. In addition, provision of N95 respiratory masks is believed to be an essential requirement for effective engagement of the healthcare workers on high-quality in-hospital TB care, alongside TB quality improvement teams in each health facility to ensure an effective implementation, monitoring and evaluation.

Supporting information

S1 File. Prompts used in the individual in-depth interview and focus group discussions.

Supporting information of manuscript “National TB program shortages as potential factor for poor-quality TB care cascade: healthcare workers’ perspective from Beira, Mozambique”.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Tutorial Commission of the doctoral program of Miguelhete Lisboa (Professors Sonia Dias and Miguel Viveiros at Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal); people who helped in the collection and data management: Marques Nhamonga, Joaquim Lequechane and Estefano Colove; the Centro de Investigação Operacional da Beira directorate and all colleagues, the Beira Central Hospital directorate and all healthcare workers.

Data Availability

The dataset generated and analysed during the current study is not publicly available due to confidentiality reasons although an anonymized minimal dataset could be provided to any researcher upon reasonable formal request to the Internal Scientific Committee of Centro de Investigação Operacional da Beira, Instituto Nacional de Saúde, at geral@ciob.gov.mz or Rua Correia Brito, #1323 – Pontagea, Beira, Moçambique.

Funding Statement

This study was elaborated based on the work of first Miguelhete Lisboa’s doctoral program, a Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian (FCG) scholarship holder (ID: P-135647/SBG/2014) and, used grants obtained from World Health Organization, The Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (WHO/TDR) and co-sponsored by the United Nations Children’s Fund, United Nations Development Programme, World Bank and WHO – award ID number: B40151/2014. The FCG and WHO/TDR were neither involved in the design of the study and collection, analysis, interpretation of data, nor in the writing of manuscript or decision to publish. Therefore, the authors are responsible for all information.

References

Decision Letter 0

Frederick Quinn

26 Nov 2019

PONE-D-19-22633

National TB program shortages as potential factor for poor-quality TB care cascade: healthcare workers’ perspective from Beira, Mozambique

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Lisboa,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Frederick Quinn

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

1. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified (1) whether consent was informed and (2) what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Authors should address these minor comments

ABSTRACT:

(a) In the background it is not very clear what you intend to communicate. Please rephrase for clarity.

(b) The last part of the "Objective) i.e. "---to overcome them toward to the TB elimination" should be revisited.

(c) Line 67 and throughout the manuscript: Write "lab" in full i.e. "laboratory"

INTRODUCTION:

Lines 121-123 should be rewritten for clarity.

MATERIALS and METHODS:

(a) Line 127: Should be "This was a cross-sectional qualitative study(13) conducted from January to February 2019".

(b) Lines 135-138: Please provide the total number of health workers in the Beira Central Hospital against the indicated health categories i.e. nurses, medical doctors etc.

(c) Lines 141-142: For an average reader, please describe where Beira city is located within Mozambique i.e. northern, central, eastern etc.

(d) Line 152: Should be "FGD were used to assess a broad range of views about --------"

(e) Line 159-160: Should be "We conducted fifteen IDI with five medical doctors, seven managers and three hospital decision-makers"

(f) Lines 161-164: Although the consent procedure is mentioned, please mention whether the study obtained ethics approval from an ethics committee?

RESULTS:

(a) Line 265: Correct the typo i.e. should be "resource"

(b) Line 292: Fear of contamination is frequently mentioned in the text but what do you mean exactly? Do you mean contamination of TB cultures or health workers getting infected by TB (as the context of lines 292-298 suggest?). Clarify.

Reviewer #2: The authors target the programmatic manageable shortages, specifically the task shifting inefficiency of TB services, that persist in regions with poor quality of TB management. The authors seek to understand the root causes of poor implementation of task shifting strategy and draw a conclusion from narrative survey-based data. The overall logic is sound, scientifically. However, given that only healthcare workers, who have been implementing guided TB services and strategies, were included the in this study, how do you justify the insight of the interviewees? Or is there any evidence suggesting the identified factors extracted from the interviews are the ones playing the most crucial role in the quality of TB services?

In addition, please monitor the writing throughout the manuscript. There are typos and confusing sentences in the manuscript. For example, line 55, line 77-78, line 101-104, Table 1 Percentage "51, 9" or "51.9", line 319.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Feb 14;15(2):e0228927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228927.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


8 Jan 2020

Reviewers’ comments and authors’ responses to each point raised by the reviewers

Responses to reviewer #1

ABSTRACT:

(a) In the background it is not very clear what you intend to communicate. Please rephrase for clarity.

The content of the background (under abstract section) was revised and now is written as following: Mozambique is one of the countries with the deadly implementation gaps in the tuberculosis (TB) care and services delivery. In-hospital delays in TB diagnosis and treatment, transmission and mortality still persist, in part, due to poor-quality of TB care cascade.

(b) The last part of the "Objective) i.e. "---to overcome them toward to the TB elimination" should be revisited.

The content of the objective (under abstract section) was rewritten as following:

We aimed to assess, from the healthcare workers’ (HCW) perspective, factors associated with poor-quality TB care cascade and explore local sustainable suggestions to improve in-hospital TB care and services delivery.

(c) Line 67 and throughout the manuscript: Write "lab" in full i.e. "laboratory"

Thanks for the excellent comment. The word was revised on every single page of the document and now is written in full “laboratory” instead of lab

INTRODUCTION:

Lines 121-123 should be rewritten for clarity.

The content of the lines (under introduction section) were rewritten as following:

This study was carried out to assess, from the healthcare workers’ perspective, the factors associated with in-hospital poor-quality TB care cascade and explore local sustainable suggestions to improve in-hospital TB care services.

MATERIALS and METHODS:

(a) Line 127: Should be "This was a cross-sectional qualitative study (13) conducted from January to February 2019".

This sentence was corrected as recommended. “This was a cross-sectional qualitative study (13) conducted from January to February 2019”

(b) Lines 135-138: Please provide the total number of health workers in the Beira Central Hospital against the indicated health categories i.e. nurses, medical doctors etc.

Under the study design, population and sample section, is rewritten as:

The target population was the health staff from the Beira Central Hospital dealing with TB matters. Therefore, there were a total of 71 healthcare workers including managers and decision-makers. Among them, there were 11 medical doctors, 16 nurses, 13 laboratory technicians and 31 hospital auxiliary workers. We used a convenience sampling approach to select our sample(13). The selected categories of health workers represent the full range of healthcare staff with different levels of training and experience in relation to TB. They also had different responsibilities and possibly had different perceptions and practices related to TB diagnosis, treatment and infection control measures within the central hospital.

Our sample was purposively only made of staff working in the medical wards and TB laboratory, hence, 20 hospital auxiliary workers, 10 nurses, 5 medical doctors, 9 TB laboratory technicians. Additionally, 7 managers and 3 hospital decision-makers were also selected and asked to participate in the focus group discussions (FGD) and individual in-depth interviews (IDI).

(c) Lines 141-142: For an average reader, please describe where Beira city is located within Mozambique i.e. northern, central, eastern etc.

Under the study setting section, the paragraph was rewritten as:

The study was carried out in Hospital Central da Beira. Beira city (the capital of Sofala province) is located in the central region of Mozambique (about 1,200 km northern of Maputo, the capital city of Mozambique). Beira is the second largest city in Mozambique with a population estimated in about 463,442 inhabitants in 2017. The TB incidence rate (659/100,000 inhabitants) and TB/HIV co-infection rate (about 63%) in Beira city are above the national average(14).

(d) Line 152: Should be "FGD were used to assess a broad range of views about -----"

This sentence was corrected as recommended. “FGD were used to assess a broad range of views about TB within medical wards from auxiliary workers, nurses and TB laboratory technicians”

(e) Line 159-160: Should be "We conducted fifteen IDI with five medical doctors, seven managers and three hospital decision-makers"

This sentence was corrected as recommended. “We conducted fifteen IDI with five medical doctors, seven managers and three hospital decision-makers”

(f) Lines 161-164: Although the consent procedure is mentioned, please mention whether the study obtained ethics approval from an ethics committee?

The authors have included an ethical statement (under “methods and material” section – on page 08) as following:

“The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Bioethics Committee for Health of the National Institute of Health of Mozambique and by WHO Ethics Review Committee. The Mozambique Ministry of Health, the Sofala Provincial Health and Beira Central Hospital authorities provided administrative approval. After an introduction of the participants, researchers and the objectives of the study, written informed consent procedures were ensured. Therefore, all participants signed an informed consent form. Participants were allowed to decline to take part of the FGD or IDI. To ensure that every healthcare worker had the opportunity to contribute freely in the FGD, the groups were homogeneous in terms of responsibilities. The anonymity of the participants was guaranteed by their identification with the initial letters of their professional category followed by the numeral, according to the chronological order of the interviews or sitting position during the focus discussion groups, for example, MD1 (Medical Doctor 1), DM3 (Decision-Maker 3), AW5 (Auxiliary Worker 5), M3 (Manager 3), LT9 (Laboratory Technicians 9), and so on.”

RESULTS:

(a) Line 265: Correct the typo i.e. should be "resource"

The typo was corrected. Now is written “resource”

(b) Line 292: Fear of contamination is frequently mentioned in the text but what do you mean exactly? Do you mean contamination of TB cultures or health workers getting infected by TB (as the context of lines 292-298 suggest?). Clarify.

Thanks for the excellent comment. The sentence was revised on every single page of the document and now is clear that we’re referring to: “fear of healthcare workers getting infected by TB”

Responses to reviewer #2

The authors target the programmatic manageable shortages, specifically the task shifting inefficiency of TB services, that persist in regions with poor quality of TB management. The authors seek to understand the root causes of poor implementation of task shifting strategy and draw a conclusion from narrative survey-based data. The overall logic is sound, scientifically. However, given that only healthcare workers, who have been implementing guided TB services and strategies, were included the in this study, how do you justify the insight of the interviewees? Or is there any evidence suggesting the identified factors extracted from the interviews are the ones playing the most crucial role in the quality of TB services?

Thank you very much for this comment.

As we stated in the paper, the aim of this study was to understand, from the healthcare workers’ perspective, the cause of causes of poor quality of TB care cascade within the hospital environment. As described by Patton, M. (1990) purposeful typical case sampling - interviewing key-healthcare cadres who are dealing with, are knowledgeable and have experience on TB care and services delivery and management - can help identify what are and not typical concerns, rather than general healthcare workers or patients.

Therefore, we do believe that the factors extracted from the interviews are the ones playing the most crucial role in the quality of TB services, at least at the Beira Central Hospital. However, we are keeping in mind that the purpose of typical cases is to describe and illustrate what is and not typical to those unfamiliar with the program, and not to make generalized statements about the experiences of all participants.

In addition, please monitor the writing throughout the manuscript. There are typos and confusing sentences in the manuscript. For example:

line 55, - the background of the abstract was revised and rewritten as:

In-hospital tuberculosis (TB) delays, transmission and mortality persists in Mozambique, in part, due to poor-quality of TB care cascade. Little is known about the local factors associated with the deadly implementation gaps in the TB care and services delivery.

line 77-78, - the conclusion of the abstract was revised and was rewritten as:

Shortage of resources within the national TB control programme is one of the potential factors for poor-quality of the TB care cascade. Task shifting of TB care and services delivery to lower HCW, decentralization of the molecular TB diagnostic tools, and regular provision of N95 respiratory masks should contribute not just to reduce the impact of resource scarceness, but also to ensure proper TB diagnosis and treatment to both sensitive and MDR TB.

line 101-104, - the content of the lines (under introduction section) was revised and rewritten as:

In-hospital delays of TB diagnosis and treatment, transmission and mortality persist around the country, in part, due to poor-quality of TB care cascade (7-9). Shortage of resources seems to hinder the local authority commitment on reduction of delays in TB diagnosis and treatment, morbidity and mortality (8-10).

Table 1 Percentage "51, 9" or "51.9",

The table content and typos were revised and can be found on the page 9 of the doc in track changes.

line 319. - the content of the sentence (under discussion section) was revised and rewritten:

In addition, task shifting was mentioned from the TB management perspective, meaning to higher professionals to lower healthcare workers.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Responses to Reviewers 08_Dec_2019.docx

Decision Letter 1

Frederick Quinn

28 Jan 2020

National TB program shortages as potential factor for poor-quality TB care cascade: healthcare workers’ perspective from Beira, Mozambique

PONE-D-19-22633R1

Dear Dr. Lisboa,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Frederick Quinn

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Authors have satisfactorily responded to all my comments. I recommend publication of this manuscript without further revisions.

Reviewer #2: The authors have addressed all the comments properly. The structure of the manuscript, the introduction of the study goal, the data presentation, the insight have been polished to a publication quality.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: David Patrick Kateete

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Frederick Quinn

30 Jan 2020

PONE-D-19-22633R1

National TB program shortages as potential factor for poor-quality TB care cascade: healthcare workers’ perspective from Beira, Mozambique

Dear Dr. Lisboa:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Frederick Quinn

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Prompts used in the individual in-depth interview and focus group discussions.

    Supporting information of manuscript “National TB program shortages as potential factor for poor-quality TB care cascade: healthcare workers’ perspective from Beira, Mozambique”.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Responses to Reviewers 08_Dec_2019.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The dataset generated and analysed during the current study is not publicly available due to confidentiality reasons although an anonymized minimal dataset could be provided to any researcher upon reasonable formal request to the Internal Scientific Committee of Centro de Investigação Operacional da Beira, Instituto Nacional de Saúde, at geral@ciob.gov.mz or Rua Correia Brito, #1323 – Pontagea, Beira, Moçambique.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES