Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Nov 6;237(2):329–344. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05368-z

SOCIAL EXPERIENCE AND SEX-DEPENDENT REGULATION OF AGGRESSION IN THE LATERAL SEPTUM BY EXTRASYNAPTIC δGABAA RECEPTORS

JOHNATHAN M BORLAND a,b, JAMES C WALTON a,b, ALISA NORVELLE a,b, KYMBERLY N GRANTHAM a,b, LAUREN M AIANI a,b, TONY E LARKIN a,b, KATHARINE E MCCANN a,b, H ELLIOTT ALBERS a,b
PMCID: PMC7024004  NIHMSID: NIHMS1541913  PMID: 31691846

Abstract

Understanding the neurobiological mechanisms mediating dominance and competitive aggression is essential to understanding the development and treatment of various psychiatric disorders. Previous research suggests that these mechanisms are both sexually differentiated and influenced substantially by social experience. In numerous species, GABAA receptors in the lateral septum have been shown to play a significant role in aggression in males. However, very little is known about the role of these GABAA receptors in female aggression, the role of social experience on GABAA receptor mediated aggression, or the roles of different GABAA subtypes in regulating aggression. Thus, in the following set of experiments we determined the role of social experience in modulating GABAA receptor induced aggression in both male and female Syrian hamsters, with a particular focus on the GABAA receptor subtype mediating these effects. Activation of GABAA receptors in the dorsal lateral septum increased aggression in both males and females. Social housing, however, significantly decreased the ability of GABAA receptor activation to induce aggression in males but not females. No significant differences were observed in the effects of GABAA receptor activation in dominant and subordinate group housed hamsters. Finally, examination of potential GABAA receptor subtype specificity revealed that social housing decreased the ratio of extrasynaptic to synaptic subunit GABAA receptor mRNA expression in the anterior dorsal lateral septum. While activation of extrasynaptic, but not synaptic GABAA receptors in the dorsal lateral septum increased aggression. These data suggest that social experience can have profound effects on the neuronal mechanisms mediating aggression, especially in males, and that δ extrasynaptic GABAA receptors may be an important therapeutic target in disorders characterized by high levels of aggression.

Keywords: Social behavior, social isolation, agonistic behavior, sex differences, synaptic γGABAA receptors, dominance relationships

1. Introduction

Dominance and competitive aggression play a critical role in the development and maintainence of social relationships in nearly all mammalian species. Relatively little is known, however, about the neurobiological mechanisms underlying dominance and aggression in females. Emerging evidence indicates that these mechanisms can regulate dominance and aggression in radically different ways in males and females (Terranova et al., 2016). Perhaps this should not be surprising because social behavior is evolutionarily ancient and evolved in males and females in response to very different selective pressures. Understanding the sex differences in the neurobiological mechanisms regulating social behaviors is clinically important because it is likely that these differences underlie the sex differences in the prevalence of psychiatric disorders (Young & Pfaff, 2014).

Social isolation can have detrimental effects on social behavior and mental health (Suomi, Harlow, & Kimball, 1971), while social interaction and strong social networks can have beneficial effects on health and increase resilience to stress (Morrison et al., 2014; Snyder-Mackler et al., 2016). Very little is known, however, about how social experience modulates the neural circuits controlling social behavior. One of the most robust effects of social isolation is a substantial increase in aggression in both males and females (Brain, 1972a; Chang, Hsiao, Chen, Yu, & Gean, 2015; Tremblay, 2014). In the present study, we investigate potential effects of social experience (i.e. isolated vs. socially housed) and the quality of social experience (i.e. dominant vs. subordinate) on the neural mechanisms regulating aggression in both males and females.

Syrian hamsters are an outstanding animal model for the investigation of the neurobiology of dominance and aggression (Terranova et al., 2016). Unlike laboratory mice and rats, females as well as male hamsters rapidly establish stable hierarchical dominance relationships like those seen in primates (Drickamer & Vandenbergh, 1973; Drickamer, Vandenbergh, & Colby, 1973). Hamsters also engage in numerous social behaviors that are essential for developing and maintaining social relationships such as social recognition, social reward, social avoidance, and social communication (Albers, 2015; Huhman et al., 2003). Much is also known about the neural mechanisms and the hormones controlling aggression in hamsters (Albers, 2012; Albers & Bamshad, 1998; Harmon, Moore, Huhman, & Albers, 2002).

The lateral septum (LS) has long been recognized as a structure involved in the control of a variety of social behaviors including aggression (Bredewold, Schiavo, van der Hart, Verreij, & Veenema, 2015; Nelson & Trainor, 2007). The LS is reciprocally connected to a number of structures that form a neural circuit controlling aggression that includes the medial amygdala, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, anterior hypothalamus and ventrolateral hypothalamus (Delville, De Vries, & Ferris, 2000). Several lines of evidence suggest that GABA in the lateral septum influences various forms of aggression in several different species (DaVanzo, Chamberlain, & McConnaughey, 1986; G. Lee & Gammie, 2009; Potegal, Perumal, Barkai, Cannova, & Blau, 1982; Potegal, Yoburn, & Glusman, 1983; Simler, Puglisi-Allegra, & Mandel, 1982). More recently, activation of GABAA receptors in the lateral septum has been found to induce high levels of aggression in male Syrian hamsters (McDonald, Markham, Norvelle, Albers, & Huhman, 2012).

GABAA receptors are a family of heteropentameric receptors composed from 19 identified subunits (Sieghart & Sperk, 2002; Sigel & Steinmann, 2012). The most well studied GABAA receptors are those containing the γ2 subunit (γ2 GABAA receptors) (Belelli et al., 2009; Farrant & Nusser, 2005) that are found in synaptic regions, have a low GABA binding affinity, and mediate a transient phasic current. More recently, however, GABAA receptors containing the δ subunit (δ GABAA receptors) have been identified in extrasynaptic regions. δ GABAA have a high GABA binding affinity, are found on dendrites, somas, and axons, and mediate a persistent tonic current (Albers, Walton, Gamble, McNeill, & Hummer, 2017; Brown, Kerby, Bonnert, Whiting, & Wafford, 2002; V. Lee & Maguire, 2014). Thus, in the following set of experiments we determined the role of social experience in modulating GABAA receptor induced aggression in both male and female hamsters, with a particular focus on the GABAA receptor subtype mediating these effects.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

Male and female Syrian hamsters (120–130 g) 11 weeks old were purchased from Charles River Laboratory (Wilmington, MA) and were housed on a reverse light-dark cycle (14L:10D). All hamsters (housed singly or in groups) were housed in solid-bottom polycarbonate cages (43 cm × 22 cm × 20 cm) containing corncob bedding and cotton nesting material (Neslets; Ancare, Bellmore, NY). Food and water were available ad libitum. All females were examined daily to determine stage of the estrous cycle. Hamsters were gently restrained while vaginal secretion was examined. Only two out of the 47 female subjects displayed an abnormal estrous cycle, and they were excluded from statistical analysis (approximately <5%). Males were also examined in the same frequency as females to control for handling effects. Animal procedures were carried out in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Georgia State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

2.2. Housing & Stereotaxic Surgery

Upon arrival hamsters were housed socially (3–4 same sex hamsters per cage) or singly. Three weeks after arrival hamsters were anesthetized with isoflurane (induced at 5% and maintained at 2–4%) and a 4 mm 26-gauge cannula was implanted unilaterally aimed at the LS (from bregma; anteroposterior (AP) +1.7 mm; mediolateral (ML) +1.5 mm; dorsoventral (DV) −3.5 mm; 10° angle). Guide cannula were secured to the skull with screws, 11 mm wound clips and dental adhesive. Dummy caps were inserted to prevent clogging. All hamsters were injected subcutaneously with the analgesic agent ketoprofen (5 mg/kg) and were allowed to recover for at least 1 week prior to behavioral testing.

2.3. Microinjections

Early in the dark phase of the light:dark cycle, microinjections were administered with a 1 μl Hamilton syringe using a 12 mm, 32-gauge needle that extended an additional 1.2 mm beyond cannula to a final depth of 4.7 mm below skull surface. Drug was delivered in a volume of 50 or 200 nl at a rate of 0.400 ul min−1 unless noted otherwise. Pilot studies revealed no behavioral differences between bilateral versus unilateral injections in the lateral septum. The needle was left in place for an additional 30 seconds to allow diffusion away from the tip of the injection cannula. Microinjections were completed in a counterbalanced order with treatments spaced at least 4 days apart. The drugs used were muscimol (non-selective GABAA receptor agonist) (Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in sterile saline to a final concentration of 25mM and 5mM (McDonald et al., 2012; Potegal et al., 1983); 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo(5,4-c)pyridine-3-ol (THIP: gaboxadol, a selective δ subunit containing GABAA receptor agonist) (Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in sterile saline to a final concentration of 25mM (Depaulis & Vergnes, 1983, 1985; Ehlen & Paul, 2009); chlordiazepoxide (CDP, a selective γ2 subunit containing GABAA receptor agonist) (Grace Discovery Sciences) dissolved in sterile saline to a final concentration of 2mM, 25mM and 200mM (Frye, McCown, & Breese, 1983; G. Lee & Gammie, 2009), and Ro15–4513 (a selective γ2 subunit containing GABAA receptor antagonist) (Tocris Bioscience) dissolved in 0.1% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) saline solution to a final concentration of 40μM (Dar, 2001; McElroy, Zakaria, Glass, & Prosser, 2009; Melon & Boehm, 2011; Saldivar-Gonzalez, Gomez, Martinez-Lomeli, & Arias, 2000). For all experiments utilizing Ro15–4513 all drugs were dissolved in sterile saline and 0.1% DMSO as the vehicle. The concentrations of all drugs administered were based on the concentrations used in previous studies that were found effective in altering behavior in hamsters or other rodents.

2.4. Social Behavior Testing

Ten min following microinjection, hamsters were placed into a neutral arena (43 cm × 22 cm × 20 cm) with a novel non-aggressive smaller same-sex stimulus hamster (100–110 g). Test sessions lasted five min and were recorded using the Noldus Observer system. The videos were later scored by an experimenter blind to the treatment groups. All behavioral tests were performed during the first three hours of the dark phase of the light cycle. Females were tested on their first day of diestrus (Drickamer & Vandenbergh, 1973). The duration of aggression and the number of attacks were scored in all hamsters (Drickamer & Vandenbergh, 1973; Drickamer et al., 1973; Gray, Norvelle, Larkin, & Huhman, 2015). The duration of aggression was a conglomerate of behaviors in which the subject hamster either pins (subject is positioned on top of stimulus and restrains locomotion of stimulus), bites/attacks (opened mouth with head pushed into stimulus animal’s flank or abdomen and elicits an audible vocalization from stimulus animal) or intensely pursues or chases fleeing stimulus hamster. In experiment 2A, the number of times aggression was initiated (Aggression Bouts), the latency to the initial onset of aggression (Latency to Aggression), the latency to the initial attack (Latency to Attacks), the amount of time each hamster spent approaching and sniffing the other hamster (Social Investigation Duration) and the duration of time each hamster spent not engaging in any form of social behavior (Non Social Duration) were also recorded.

2.5. Histology

Within 24 hours of the final behavioral test hamsters were killed with a lethal dose of sodium pentobarbital (0.2 ml, i.p. Henry Schein Animal Health, Dublin, OH) and 50 or 200 nl of India ink was microinjected through the guide cannula to mark the injection site. Brains were extracted and submerged in 10% formalin for at least 24 hours at 4° C. Brains were sectioned at 40 μm with a cryostat and collected onto superfrost plus slides. Tissues were stained with neutral red. Cannula placements were classified as hits if ink was seen within the dorsal or intermediate lateral septum, referenced to the hamster stereotaxic atlas (Morin & Wood, 2001).

2.6. Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

Hamsters were given a lethal dose of sodium pentobarbital, decapitated, and brains were rapidly removed and flash frozen by submerging in isopentane on dry ice. Brains were collected during the first three hours of the dark phase of the light cycle. After flash freezing, brains were faced in the coronal plane in an RNase free cryostat and 1.00 mm bilateral punches were collected from the lateral septum and medial septum. Four separate bilateral punches were collected for the lateral septum: anterior dorsal, anterior ventral, posterior dorsal and posterior ventral (Figure 5a). Samples were kept in an −80°C freezer until RNA isolation. For RNA isolation samples were homogenized in 1.0 ml Trizol (Ambion) using a sterile pestle, vortexed, and left at room temperature for 5 min. RNA was then washed twice with 200 μl chloroform and centrifuged at 12,000 g for 15 min at 4°C. After collection of aqueous phase, to facilitate RNA precipitation 2 μl of glycoblue was added and mixed by flicking tube. RNA was precipitated with 500 μl of 100% isopropanol and pellet collected following centrifugation at 12,000 g for 15 min at 4°C. Supernate was carefully drawn off and pellet washed twice with 1.0 ml of 75% ethanol and 25% RNAse-free water. Pellet was finally air dried for 10–15 min, resuspended in 15 μl of RNase-free water, and RNA concentration was determined using a NanoDrop 2000. Samples were then stored in −80°C freezer until cDNA synthesis. For cDNA synthesis, 150 ng of total RNA was then reverse transcribed into cDNA using Cloned AMV First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, RNA and random-hexamer primer were denatured by incubating at 65°C for 5 min, and then following addition of the master reaction mix, tubes were transferred to a thermal cycler and heated to 25°C for 10 min, then 50°C for 45 min and finally the reaction was terminated by incubating at 85°C for 5 min. For RT-qPCR, cDNA was diluted 1:5 in deionized water and each well was composed of 10 μl buffer, 1 μl cDNA, 1 μl gene of interest assay (probes and primers), 1 μl housekeeping gene (18s) assay and 7 μl deionized water. Relative gene expression was quantified using an ABI 7500 FAST Real-Time system using Taqman Universal PCR master mix and the following universal two-step RT-PCR cycling conditions: 50°C for 2 min, 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min. The following primer/probe sets from Applied Biosystems were used: δGABAA (ABI Mm0126603_g1), γ2GABAA (ABI Rn00788325_m1), and 18s (4319413E). Relative gene expression for each sample run in duplicate was calculated by comparing to a relative standard curve and then standardized to 18s rRNA expression. Relative cDNA standards were generated using pooled hippocampal RNA extracts. Only average quantity values with standard deviations less than 0.12 were included. Quantity values beyond 2.0 standard deviations from the overall mean of all samples were also excluded from data analysis as outliers.

2.7. Experimental Design

Experiment 1

The goal of this experiment was to determine the subregion(s) of the septum where activation of GABAA increased aggression. In order to conserve animal usage this study was conducted only in males. 46 males were housed singly for 3 weeks prior to stereotaxic surgery. One week following surgery hamsters were injected with 50 nl of saline or 5mM muscimol in the dorsal LS (n=9), ventral LS (n=6), medial septum (n=10), or lateral ventricle (n=7). Ten minutes after injection hamsters were tested for social behavior with a same-sex stimulus hamster. Each hamster received both saline and muscimol injections in a counter-balanced manner. Testing occurred 4 days apart.

Experiment 2

The goal of this experiment was to confirm that activation of GABAA receptors in the dorsal LS increased aggression in females as well as male hamsters and to determine if social experience influences aggression induced by GABAA receptors. Part A) 18 males and 23 females were either housed socially (3–4 per cage) or singly for 3 weeks prior to stereotaxic surgery. One week following surgery hamsters were injected with 200 nl of saline or 5mM muscimol in the dorsal LS 10 min prior to the social behavior test. Injections were counter-balanced and testing occurred 4 days apart (Figure 1). Part B) The hamsters were also later injected with 200 nl of 25mM muscimol in the LS 10 min prior to social behavior test. This testing occurred 4 days after second drug injection (either saline or 5mM muscimol). Part C) Because group-housed male and female hamsters likely form dominance hierarchies in their home cages, another experiment was conducted to determine if muscimol had different effects on aggression in dominant versus subordinant hamsters. The dominant and subordinate hamsters in each cage were identified by comparing the composite aggression score (aggression duration) during a baseline aggression test (highest scores were considered to be the dominant hamster). The experiment was conducted as described in Part A above comparing dominant males (n=4), subordinant males (n=11), dominant females (n=5) and subordinant females (n=11).

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Experimental design for Experiments 2 and 3. Male and female hamsters were either socially housed or socially isolated for three weeks. In Experiment 2, they were anesthetized and a cannula was stereotaxically aimed at the lateral septum and given one week to recover from surgery. Ten minutes after receiving either saline or muscimol, hamsters were placed in a neutral arena with a same-sex smaller (100–110g) stimulus hamster for five minutes. Subsequent drug injections and behavior testing occurred no less than four days apart. In Experiment 3, after four weeks of social or single housing, tissue samples from the septum were collected and processed for δ and γ2 GABAA receptor mRNA expression.

Experiment 3

The goal of this experiment was to examine whether there are sex and/or housing differences in the expression of δGABAA and γ2GABAA receptor subunit mRNA. 16 males and 16 females were either socially (3–4 per cage) or single housed for 4 weeks. δGABAA and γ2GABAA receptor subunit mRNA expression was analyzed by RT-qPCR (aLSd, aLSv, pLSd, pLSv, MS).

Experiment 4

Because no sex differences were observed in δ or γ2 subunit GABAA mRNA expression in the previous experiment only males were used in the following experiment in order to conserve animal usage. 12 males were housed singly for 3 weeks prior to stereotaxic surgery. One week following surgery, hamsters were injected with 200 nl of saline, 5mM muscimol, 25mM THIP or 25mM CDP in the dorsal LS 10 min prior to being tested for social behavior. Each subject received each of the four drug treatments; injections were counter-balanced and testing occurred 4 days apart.

Experiment 5

Because no sex differences were observed in δ or γ2 subunit GABAA mRNA expression in experiment 3 only males were used in the following two experiments in order to conserve animal usage. 5 males were housed singly and were injected with 200 nl of saline, 2mM CDP or 200mM CDP in the dorsal LS prior to social behavior test. Injections were counter-balanced and testing occurred 4 days apart.

Experiment 6

12 males were housed singly and were injected with 200 nl of vehicle (saline + 0.1%DMSO), 25mM THIP, 40μM Ro15–4513 or a 1:1 cocktail of 50mM THIP + 80μM Ro15–4513 into the dorsal LS. Injections were counter-balanced and testing occurred 4 days apart.

2.8. Data Analysis

All data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. For the first experiment, hamsters were categorized based on site of injection, and the change in the duration of aggression and the number of attacks (muscimol 5mM – saline condition) were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Paired sample t-tests were also used to compare muscimol versus saline for the duration of aggression and the number of attacks for each brain region. For Experiment 2A, a 2 × 2 ANOVA was used to confirm main effects of sex and housing as well as their interactions on the duration of aggression in saline-treated hamsters. Post hoc comparisons were carried out using Tukey’s HSD. A 2 × 2 ANOVA was used to examine the main effects of sex and housing as well as their interactions on the change in the duration of aggression and the number of attacks (muscimol 5mM – saline condition). Post hoc comparisons were carried out using Tukey’s HSD. Paired sample t-tests were also employed to compare muscimol versus saline on the duration of aggression, the number of attacks, number of aggression bouts, the latency to aggression, the latency to attack, social investigation duration and non-social duration for each sex and housing condition. For experiment 2B, one-way ANOVAs were utilized to examine the effect of high concentration of muscimol (25mM) on the duration of aggression and the number of attacks for each treatment condition. For experiment 2C, a 2 × 2 ANOVA was used to examine the main effects of sex and hierarchy status as well as their interaction on the change in the duration of aggression and the number of attacks. Post hoc comparisons were carried out using Tukey’s HSD. Paired sample t-tests were also employed to compare muscimol versus saline on the duration of aggression and the number of attacks for each sex and heirarchy condition. Finally, a 2 × 2 × 3 ANOVA and one-way ANOVAs were utilized to examine the effect of high concentration of muscimol (25mM) on the duration of aggression and the number of attacks for each treatment group. For Experiment 3, a 2 × 2 ANOVA was used to examine the main effects of sex and housing on δGABAA and γ2GABAA receptor expression in the lateral septum. All pharmacological GABAA receptor subtype specificity experiments (4–6) were analyzed using a one-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by pairwise comparisons using Tukey’s HSD. Data were examined to determine if the assumptions of parametric statistical tests were met. When assumptions were violated, data were log or cube root transformed. All analyses were completed with the use of SPSS statistical software (SAS Institute, 1990). All tests were two-tailed and results were considered statistically significant if p < 0.05. Animals were not included in statistical analysis if their injection sites were not within the boundaries of the dorsal or intermediate lateral septum.

3. Results

3.1. Experiment 1: Localization of sites within the septum where aggression is induced by activation of GABAA receptors

To determine where activation of GABAA receptors in the septum stimulates aggression, male hamsters were injected with 50 nl of 5mM muscimol or saline in a counter-balanced order in various sub-regions of the septum or surrounding brain regions (Fig 2a). Injections of muscimol into the dorsal LS significantly increased the duration of aggression (p=0.006 Fig 2b) and the number of attacks (p=0.030 Fig 2c) compared with saline. However, neither injections into the medial septum, ventral LS nor lateral ventricle increased the duration of aggression or the number of attacks, respectively, compared with saline (p>0.05). Injections into the dorsal LS yielded the greatest increase in the duration of aggression (main effect: p=0.013, F(3,31) = 4.303; Fig 2d) and the number of attacks (main effect: p=0.237, F(3,31) = 1.496; Fig 2e) compared with other brain regions.

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Exp. 1: Effect of muscimol injected into the septum and surrounding brain regions on aggression. (a) Coronal sections illustrating the sites of injections. Dark circles indicate a more than 50 sec increase in the duration of aggression in hamsters injected with muscimol 5mM compared with those injected with saline. Light circles indicate no increase or a decrease in the duration of aggression in hamsters injected with muscimol 5mM compared to those injected with saline. Muscimol (grey bars) in the dorsal LS, but not ventral LS, medial septum nor lateral ventricle increased the duration of aggression (b) and the number of attacks (c) compared to saline controls (black bars). Muscimol injections into the dorsal LS yield the greatest increase in the duration of aggression (d) and in the number of attacks (e) compared with the other sites examined (* indicates p<0.05). The greatest increase in aggression was found with injections into the dorsal lateral septum. (f) Representative image of an injection tract (blue dye) into the dorsal lateral septum. LSd, dorsal lateral septum; LSi, intermediate lateral septum; LSv, ventral lateral septum; MS, medial septum; LV, lateral ventricle; TS, triangular septal nucleus. (dorsal LS n=9, ventral LS n=6, medial septum n=10 and lateral ventricle n=7).

Experiment 2: Effect of social experience on spontaneous aggression and aggression induced by activation of GABAA receptors in males and females

To determine if social experience influences aggressive behavior, male and female hamsters were housed singly or in groups (3–4) for four weeks before behavior testing. Social housing decreased the duration of aggression in both males and females (p=0.000, F(1,26) = 34.434). Isolated males had a longer duration of aggression than socially housed males (p=0.006 Fig. 3) and socially isolated females had a longer duration of aggression than socially housed females (p=0.000 Fig. 3). Furthermore, although there was a main effect of sex on the duration of aggression (p=0.019, F(1,26) = 6.204), socially housed males and females did not differ in the duration of aggression (p>0.05) and isolated males and females did not differ in the duration of aggression (p>0.05). Also, there was similar amount of variability in the duration of aggression in socially housed and single housed hamsters (Levene’s Test of Equality of Error Variance: p>0.05) suggesting that it was unlikely that the formation of dominance hierarchies in the group housed hamsters was responsible for their lower duration of aggression (Fig. 3).

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

Effect of social housing and sex on aggression. Social isolation increased the duration of aggression in both male and female hamsters injected with saline in the dorsal LS (* indicates p < 0.05). (Single Housed Males n=8, Socially Housed Males n=7, Single Housed Females n=7, Socially Housed Females n=8).

To examine if social experience influences aggression induced by GABAA receptors, male and female hamsters were housed singly or in groups for 4 weeks and then injected with either saline or 5mM muscimol in a counter-balanced order (Part A). Muscimol (5mM) increased the duration of aggression in isolated males (p=0.004, n=8, Fig. 4b), isolated females (p=0.018, n=7, Fig. 4b) and socially housed females (p=0.042, n=8, Fig. 4b), but not socially housed males (p>0.05, n=7, Fig. 4b). Muscimol also increased the number of attacks in isolated males (p=0.038, n=8, Fig. 4c), isolated females (p=0.049, n=7, Fig. 4c), and socially housed females (p=0.046, n=8, Fig. 4c), but not socially housed males (p>0.05, n=7, Fig. 4c). Thus, both sex and housing interacted such that socially isolated males had an increase in the duration of aggression (interaction: p=0.024, F(1,26) = 5.773; p=0.024 Fig. 4d) and in the number of attacks (interaction: p=0.075, F(1,26) = 3.428; p=0.030 Fig. 4e) induced by GABAA receptor activation compared with socially housed males, but there were no differences in the change of the duration of aggression or the number of attacks (p>0.05) between socially housed and isolated females.

Figure 4:

Figure 4:

(a) Coronal sections illustrating the sites of injections. Shape indicate experimental group: circle, isolated males; triangle, socially housed males; diamond, isolated females; pentagon, socially housed females. Closed shapes indicate injections into dorsal or intermediate lateral septum, classified as hits; open shapes indicate missed injection sites. LSd, dorsal lateral septum; LSi, intermediate lateral septum; LSv, ventral lateral septum; MS, medial septum; TS, triangular septal nucleus. Exp. 2 Part A (b-e): Effect of social housing and sex on aggression induced by GABAA receptor activation in the dorsal lateral septum. Muscimol 5mM (grey bars) injected into the dorsal lateral septum increased the duration of aggression (b) and the number of attacks (c) in isolated and socially housed females, isolated males, but not in socially housed males when compared with groups injected with saline (black bars). Social housing significantly decreased the change in the duration of aggression (d) and the change in the number of attacks (e) in males, but not females (p<0.05). Part B (f-g): Effect of a high concentration (25mM) of muscimol injected into the dorsal lateral septum on aggression. 25mM muscimol (dark grey bars) did not increase the duration of aggression (f) or the number of attacks (g) in socially housed or isolated males or females (p<0.05). (* indicates p < 0.05). (Single Housed Males n=8, Socially Housed Males n=7, Single Housed Females n=7, Socially Housed Females n=8).

To determine if a higher concentration of muscimol is needed to increase aggression in socially housed males, all subjects were injected with 25mM muscimol and examined for social behavior (Part B). 25mM muscimol did not increase the duration of aggression nor the number of attacks in isolated males (p>0.05 Fig 4f, 4g), socially housed males (p>0.05 Fig 4f, 4g), isolated females (p>0.05 Fig 4f, 4g), nor socially housed females (p>0.05 Fig 4f, 4g).

Histology: Hamsters were included in the study only if the tip of the injection cannula was located within the dorsal or intermediate LS. Eight hamsters were removed due to injection cannula tips located in the lateral ventricle, medial septum or corpus callosum, one guide cannula fell off before second drug injection and two female hamsters were removed due to abnormal estrous cycles (Figure 4a).

The effects of muscimol on additional measures of aggression and social interaction can be seen in Figure 5. Treatment of muscimol (5mM) decreased the number of aggressive bouts in isolated males (p=0.043) and isolated females (p=0.041), but had no effect in socially housed males nor socially housed females (p>0.05, interaction: p=0.024, F(1,54) = 60.421, Fig. 5a). Injections of muscimol (5mM) into the lateral septum decreased the latency to initiate aggressive behavior in isolated females (p=0.024), socially housed females (p=0.049) and isolated males just missed significance (p=0.105, interaction: p=0.059, F(1,54) = 3.709, Fig. 5b). Muscimol treatment had no effect on the latency to initiate aggression in socially housed males (p>0.05). Females were also quicker to attack stimulus hamsters compared to males (p<0.001, F(1,54) = 20.699, Fig. 5c) and isolated hamsters were also quicker to attack stimulus hamsters compared to socially housed hamsters (p=0.008, F(1,54) = 7.691, Fig. 5c). Interestingly though, post hoc comparisons revealed that muscimol (5mM) decreased the latency to attacks only in socially housed females (p=0.043), muscimol had no effect on the latency to attacks in isolated nor socially housed males, nor isolated females (p>0.05).

Figure 5:

Figure 5:

Effect of GABAA receptor activation in the dorsal lateral septum on addition measures of aggression and social behaviors. (a) Muscimol 5mM (grey bars) injected into the dorsal lateral septum decreased the number of aggressive bouts in isolated males and isolated females, but not in socially housed males nor socially housed females (p>0.05) compared to saline injections (black bars). (b) Muscimol 5mM decreased the latency to aggression in isolated and socially housed females. Muscimol 5mM to decrease the latency to aggression just missed significance in isolated males (p=0.105), but had no effect on the latency to aggression in socially housed males (p>0.05). (c) Muscimol 5mM decreased the latency to attacks in socially housed females, but had no effect in isolated nor socially housed males, nor isolated females (p>0.05). (d) Muscimol 5mM decreased social investigation duration in isolated and socially housed females, but not socially housed males (p>0.05). The ability for muscimol 5mM to decrease social investigation duration in isolated males just missed significance (p=0.073). (e) Muscimol 5mM had no effect on the time spent displaying non-social behaviors in isolated and socially housed males and females (p>0.05) (* indicates p < 0.05). (Single Housed Males n=8, Socially Housed Males n=7, Single Housed Females n=7, Socially Housed Females n=8).

In relation to non-aggressive descriptive behaviors, muscimol treatment decreased social investigation duration in isolated females (p=0.027), socially housed females (p=0.044), and isolated males (p=0.073) just missed significance, but had no effect in socially housed males (p>0.05; p=0.004, F(1,54) = 9.357, Fig. 5d). Finally, no effects of drug treatment were observed on the time spent displaying non-social behaviors when analyzing isolated and socially housed male and female groups independently (p>0.05, Fig. 5e).

To determine if social status altered the effects of muscimol on aggression the dominant and subordinate hamsters in each group housed cage were identified by comparing the duration of aggression during a baseline aggression test (hamsters with the longest duration of aggression in each group housed cage were considered dominant while all other subjects in the cage were considered subordinate). Thus, the experiment was conducted as described in Part A above comparing dominant males (n=4), subordinant males (n=11), dominant females (n=5) and subordinant females (n=11). As can be seen in Figure 6, The effects of muscimol on aggression in dominant and subordinate males and females was very similar. Dominant subjects spent more time displaying aggression towards stimulus hamsters compared to subordinate subjects (p=0.001, F(1,54) = 11.299). Independent of social status, there was a trend for females treated with muscimol (5mM) to display an increase in aggression duration compared to saline treated females (interaction: p=0.099, F(1,54) = 2.820), but no effect was observed for males injected with muscimol (5mM) (p>0.05, Fig. 6a) compared to saline injections. Social status had no effect on aggression duration in saline treatment condition versus muscimol 5mM treatment condition (p>0.05). Dominant subjects also displayed a greater number of attacks compared to subordinate subjects (p=0.013, F(1,54) = 6.664). Similar to aggression duration, females injected with muscimol (5mM) displayed an increase in the number of attacks compared to females injected with saline (dominant females, p=0.011; subordinate females, p=0.077; interaction: p=0.011, F(1,54) = 6.907, Fig. 6b), but no effect was observed in males injected with muscimol (5mM) (p>0.05) compared to males injected with saline. Social status had no effect on the number of attacks in saline treatment condition versus muscimol 5mM treatment condition (p>0.05).

Figure 6:

Figure 6:

Effect of social status on GABAA receptor activation induced aggression. (a) There were no differences between dominant versus subordinate males nor between dominant versus subordinate females in muscimol 5mM in the lateral septum induced aggression duration (p>0.05). (b) There were no differences between dominant versus subordinate males nor between dominant versus subordinate females in muscimol 5mM in the lateral septum induced number of attacks (p>0.05). However, dominant females injected with muscimol 5mM showed an increase in the number of attacks compared to saline injections and subordinate females injected with muscimol 5 mM showed a trend (p=0.077) to display an increase in the number of attacks compared to saline injections. (c) Females trend to display a greater change in aggression duration induced by muscimol 5mM compared to males independent of social status (p=0.086). (d) Females also displayed a greater change in the number of attacks induced by muscimol 5mM compared to males independent of social status. (e) High concentration of muscimol 25mM (dark grey bars) had no effect on aggression duration compared to saline treated dominant males, subordinate males, dominant females, nor subordinate females (p>0.05). (f) High concentration of muscimol 25mM had no effect on the number of attacks compared to saline treated dominant males, subordinate males, dominant females, nor subordinate females (p>0.05) (* indicates p < 0.05). (Dominant Males n=4, Subordinant Males n=11, Dominant Females n=5, Subordinate Females n=11).

Thus, when investigating the potential of social status to regulate the ability of GABAA receptor activation in the lateral septum (muscimol 5mM – saline treatment condition) to increase aggressive behavior; social status had no effect on muscimol (5mM) induced change in aggression duration (p>0.05, Fig. 6c). In other words, dominant versus subordinate status had no effect on muscimol (5mM) induced changes in aggression duration. However, there was a trend for socially housed females to display a greater change in aggression duration following muscimol (5mM) treatment compared to socially housed males (p=0.086, F(1,27) = 3.101, Fig. 6c) independent of social status. Likewise, social status had no effect on muscimol (5mM) induced change in the number of attacks (p>0.05, Fig. 6d). In other words, dominant versus subordinate status had no effect on muscimol (5mM) induced changes in the number of attacks. However, socially housed females did display a greater increase in the number of attacks induced by muscimol (5mM) treatment compared to socially housed males (p=0.016, F(1,27) = 6.623, Fig. 6d) independent of social status.

Finally, to determine if a higher concentration of muscimol has social status specific effects on aggression, all subjects were injected with 25mM muscimol. Muscimol (25mM) did not increase the duration of aggression in dominant males, subordinate males, dominant females, nor subordinate females (p>0.05, Fig. 6e) compared to saline injections and muscimol (25mM) had no effect on the number of attacks in dominant males, subordinate males, dominant females, nor subordinate females (p>0.05, Fig. 6f) compared to saline injections.

3.2. Experiment 3: Effects of social experience on the expression of δ GABAA and γ2 GABAA subunit receptor mRNA in the lateral septum in males and females

Because GABAA receptors have different physiological properties depending on their subunit composition, in the next set of experiments we examined if δ-containing GABAA or γ2–containing GABAA receptors in the lateral septum regulate aggressive behavior. Because social experience dramatically influences spontaneous aggression and aggression stimulated by activation of GABAA receptors in the septum, we examined if social experience alters δGABAA and γ2GABAA receptor mRNA expression in the lateral septum. Male and female hamsters were housed in groups or housed singly for 4 weeks and mRNA expression in the septum for the δ and γ2 GABAA subunits were analyzed by RT-qPCR (Figure 7a). No differences in sex or housing in δ or γ2 subunit GABAA mRNA expression were observed (p > 0.05; Data not shown). However, in the anterior dorsal lateral septum social housing decreased the ratio of the relative mRNA expression of δ to γ2 subunit GABAA receptors (F(1,21) = 4.305, p=0.050; Figure 7b). Trends towards significance in the anterior ventral lateral septum (F(1,23) = 2.764, p=0.110) for social housing to decrease the ratio of the relative mRNA expression of δ to γ2 subunit GABAA receptors were also observed (Figure 7d). However, no differences were observed for the posterior dorsal nor posterior ventral lateral septum (Figure 7c and e). Thus, social housing decreases the ratio of δ to γ2 subunit GABAA receptors within specific subregions of the septum.

Figure 7:

Figure 7:

Effect of social housing and sex on δ and γ2 subunit GABAA receptor mRNA expression in the septum. (a) Coronal sections illustrating where 1.00 mm bilateral punches were collected from the lateral septum and medial septum (light grey circle). Four separate bilateral punches were collected for the lateral septum: anterior dorsal (light grey striped), anterior ventral (dark grey striped), posterior dorsal (open circle) and posterior ventral (dark grey circle). No differences in δ nor γ2 subunit GABAA receptor mRNA expression were observed in the anterior dorsal LS, anterior ventral LS, medial septum, posterior dorsal LS, and posterior ventral LS (data not reported). However, social housing decreased the ratio of δ to γ2 subunit GABAA receptor mRNA expression in the anterior dorsal LS (p<0.05; b), and similar trends were observed in the anterior ventral LS (p=0.110; d). No differences in the ratio of δ to γ2 were observed in the posterior dorsal LS (c) and posterior ventral LS (e). Social experience regulates the ratio of δ to γ2 subunit GABAA receptor mRNA expression. (* indicates p < 0.05). (Anterior dorsal LS: Socially Housed Males n=5, Socially Housed Females n=7, Single Housed Males n=7, Single Housed Females n=6). (Anterior ventral LS: Socially Housed Males n=7, Socially Housed Females n=7, Single Housed Males n=6, Single Housed Females n=7). (Posterior dorsal LS: Socially Housed Males n=6, Socially Housed Females n=5, Single Housed Males n=7, Single Housed Females n=8). (Posterior ventral LS: Socially Housed Males n=5, Socially Housed Females n=5, Single Housed Males n=3, Single Housed Females n=6).

3.3. Experiment 4–6: Effect of GABAA receptor subtype specific agonists and antagonists in the LS on aggression

Because social housing reduces aggression and decreases the ratio of of δ to γ2 subunit GABAA receptors in the septum, we next examined if selective activation of δGABAA versus γ2GABAA receptors in the lateral septum induces aggression. Male hamsters were housed singly for 4 weeks before behavioral testing and injected with either saline, muscimol, THIP (a selective δ subunit containing GABAA receptor agonist) or CDP (a selective γ2 subunit containing GABAA receptor agonist) in a counter-balanced manner. Muscimol increased the duration of aggression (main effect: p=0.000, F(3,29) = 8.198; p=0.012 Fig 8b) and the number of attacks (main effect: p=0.006, F(3,29) = 5.130; p=0.031 Fig 8c) compared with saline, and THIP increased the duration of aggression (p=0.007 Fig 8b) while the number of attacks just missed significance (p=0.095 Fig 8c) compared with saline controls. CDP had no effect on the duration of aggression (p=1.000 Fig 8b) nor the number of attacks (p=1.000 Fig 8c). To determine if high or low concentrations of CDP increase aggression, male hamsters were injected with either 5mM or 200mM CDP or saline. CDP had no effect on the duration of aggression (p=0.968, F(2,12) = 0.032 Fig 8d) or on the number of attacks (p=0.725, F(2,12) = 0.330 Fig 8e).

Figure 8:

Figure 8:

Effect of selective agonists and antagonist that act on GABAA receptors containing the δ subunit that are found extrasynaptically or on GABAA receptors containing the γ2 subunit that are found synaptically in the lateral septum on aggression. (a) Coronal sections illustrating the sites of injections. Shape indicates experiment: circle, Experiment 4; triangle, Experiment 5; diamond, Experiment 6. Closed shapes indicate injections into the dorsal or the intermediate lateral septum, classified as hits; open shapes indicate missed injection sites. LSd, dorsal lateral septum; LSi, intermediate lateral septum; LSv, ventral lateral septum; MS, medial septum; TS, triangular septal nucleus. Exp. 4: Effect of selective GABAA agonists in the lateral septum on aggression in males. Muscimol (non-selective GABAA agonist) or THIP (extrasynaptic δGABAA agonist) injected into the LS increased the duration of aggression (b) and the number of attacks (c) compared with saline and CDP injections (synaptic γ2 GABAA agonist). (* indicates p<0.05; # indicates p<0.10). Exp. 5: Effect of a selective synaptic γ2 GABAA receptor agonist on aggression. High (200mM) and low (2mM) concentrations of CDP had no effect on the duration of aggression (d) or the number of attacks (e) compared with saline controls (p<0.05). Exp. 6: Effect of a selective synaptic γ2GABAA antagonist on aggression. THIP or a cocktail of THIP and Ro15–4513 (synaptic γ2GABAA antagonist) increased the duration of aggression (f) and the number of attacks (g) compared with saline and Ro15–4513 injections. (* Indicates a significant difference compared with saline; p<0.05). (Exp. 4 n=7 per group, Exp. 5 n=5 per group, Exp. 6 n=10 per group).

To further determine that the increase in aggression induced by THIP was the result of activation of GABAA receptors containing the δ subunit and not the γ2 subunit, hamsters were injected with either THIP, Ro15–4513 (a highly selective γ2GABAA antagonist), a cocktail of THIP + Ro15–4513 or vehicle. THIP increased the duration of aggression (main effect: p=0.003, F(3,36) = 5.602; p=0.005 Fig 8f) and the number of attacks (main effect: p=0.001, F(3,36) = 6.957; p=0.005 Fig 8g) compared with saline controls, and a cocktail of THIP and Ro15–4513 increased the duration of aggression (p=0.042 Fig 8f) and the number of attacks (p=0.003 Fig 8g) compared with saline controls. Ro15–4513 had no effect on the duration of aggression (p=0.868 Fig 8f) or on the number of attacks (p=0.657 Fig 8g).

Histology: Three hamsters were removed from analysis due to injection sites located in the lateral ventricle or corpus callosum, one guide cannula was dislodged before the third drug injection and one before the fourth drug injection in Experiment 4 (Figure 8a). No hamsters were excluded in Experiment 5 (Figure 8a). Two hamsters were removed due to injection sites located in the lateral ventricle or corpus callosum in Experiment 6 (Figure 8a).

4. Discussion

These data confirm a previous report that activation of GABAA receptors by injection of muscimol into the septum can stimulate offensive aggression in male hamsters housed in social isolation (McDonald et al., 2012). In this prior work, bilateral injections of muscimol significantly increased aggression in males tested under territorial conditions (i.e., home cage), while in the present study unilateral injections of muscimol were also highly effective in inducing aggression when tested in non-territoral conditions (i.e., neutral arena). The present data also extend this prior work by demonstrating that the aggression inducing effects of activation of GABAA receptors within the septum are restricted to the dorsal lateral septum. One limitation of this finding is that this localization study was only conducted in males so it remains possible that there are sex differences in the septal regions where activation of GABAA receptors stimulate aggression. Another limitation is that dose-reponse studies were not conducted so it is possible that other concentrations of muscimol could have induced aggression in other septal regions. It is noteworthy, however, that muscimol injected into the dorsal lateral septum was effective in stimulating aggression in both males and females. Although social isolation increases aggression in both males and females the present data indicate that there are substantial sex differences in the effects of social experience on the ability of GABAA receptor activation to stimulate aggression. In females, activation of GABAA receptors significantly increased aggression whether the hamsters were socially isolated or housed socially (whether dominant or subordinate). In males, GABAA receptor activation increased aggression only in the socially isolated group. Activation of GABAA receptors in the lateral septum did not increase aggressive behavior in either dominant nor subordinate socially housed male hamsters even when high concentrations of muscimol (i.e., 25 mM) were administered. Muscimol also decreased the number of aggressive bouts in singly housed males and females but not in group housed hamsters. Analysis of the distribution of δ and γ2 subunit GABAA receptor mRNA expression throughout the septum identified no significant sex differences or effects of social housing. Social isolation did, however, significantly increase the ratio of δ to γ2 subunit GABAA receptor mRNA expression in the anterior dorsal LS. Finally, the ability of muscimol to induce aggression by its actions in the dorsal lateral septum appears to be mediated by extrasynaptic δGABAA and not synaptic γ2GABAA receptors.

The lateral septum is very heterogeneous with afferent and efferent projections from and to a variety of structures (e.g. olfactory bulb, amygdala, thalamus ect.) (Risold & Swanson, 1997a, 1997b; Swanson & Cowan, 1979). There are substantial reciprocal connections between the lateral septum and the hypothalamus. Various subregions of the lateral septum (e.g. ventral lateral septum) topographically project to specific subregions of the hypothalamus (e.g. ventral lateral and anterior hypothalamus) (Risold & Swanson, 1997b). The dorsal hippocampus also has reciprocal connections with the lateral septum, and this hippocampus-lateral septum-hypothalamus circuitry may play a role in the integration and translation of memory and motivational processing (Leroy et al., 2018). For example, activation of hippocampal projections to the lateral septum, results in decreased inhibitory input by the lateral septum to the ventromedial hypothalamus (disinhibition) which increases aggression in male mice (Leroy et al., 2018).

Several lines of evidence indicate an important role for septal GABA in the regulation of aggression (McDonald et al., 2012; Potegal et al., 1983; Simler et al., 1982). For example, the higher levels of aggression seen in response to adolescent anabolic steroid treatment in hamsters is associated with changes in glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) levels in various brain regions including the lateral septum (Grimes, Ricci, & Melloni, 2003). There is also evidence to suggest that GABAA receptors in the septum are involved in other forms of aggression, i.e. maternal aggression (G. Lee & Gammie, 2009). In addition to GABAA receptors, the lateral septum also contains a large number of vasopressin V1a receptors. Activation of V1a receptors in the septum plays a substantial role in a form of social communication (i.e., flank marking) that has been linked the aggression and dominance in Syrian hamsters (Irvin, Szot, Dorsa, Potegal, & Ferris, 1990). The expression of flank marking by the activation of V1aRs in the lateral septum is dependent on septal interactions with hypothalamic structures (Ferris, Delville, Irvin, & Potegal, 1994). Thus, the lateral septum serves as an important structure in the neural circuitry integrating neural signals from various other brain structures as they relate to the formation and maintanence of dominance relationships.

The present data indicate that social experience can have powerful, but sex-dependent effect on whether activation of GABAA receptors can induce aggression. Other studies have also found that experience can modulate GABAergic activity (Alvarez et al., 2016; Primus & Kellogg, 1991), Interestingly, the present study suggests that social experience has similar effects in males and females on the modulation of the ratio of synaptic and extrasynaptic GABAA receptors, even though social experience (i.e., social housing versus social isolation) alters the ability of muscimol to induce aggression only in males. It is also somewhat surprising that social status had no effect on the ability of GABAA activation in the lateral septum induce aggression in males or females. While the functional significance of the inability of GABAA activation to stimulate aggression in socially housed males it not clear, it does reinforce the idea that aggression is mediated by circuits that function very differently in males and females (De Vries, 2004; McCann, Sinkiewicz, Rosenhauer, Beach, & Huhman, 2018; Terranova et al., 2016). Perhaps the sex differences in the effects of muscimol in the septum are mediated by the dense projections from the septum to sexually differentiated circuits in the hypothalamus (e.g., anterior hypothalamus). Perhaps understanding the sex differences in how social experience alters the ability of GABAA receptors to induce aggression in males and females will provide insight into the significant sex differences in the development and prevalence of psychiatric disorders (Han et al., 2012; Mohler, 2015; Sesarini et al., 2014).

The present study as well as previous work indicates that male and female hamsters housed in social isolation are significantly more aggressive than hamsters housed in groups (Brain, 1972b; Wise, 1974). The factors responsible for this increase in aggression are not well understood. One possibility is that social isolation serves as a stressor that promotes aggressiveness. Indeed, social isolation can produce some stress-like effects in some species (Locci & Pinna, 2018). In Syrian hamsters, while there is some evidence that group housing might be stressful (see Ross et al., 2017 for a discussion), male and female hamsters adapt quite well to both group housing and single housing and display no differences in cortisol levels and only minor changes in stress-related measures (Ross et al., 2017). It is also interesting that muscimol increases the number of aggressive bouts in both males and females that are singly housed but not in group housed hamsters.

These data represent some of the first evidence that δ extrasynaptic GABAA receptors play a central role in the regulation of social behavior. Interestingly, one previous study found that aggression was not altered in virgin or postpartum δGABAA null female mice, although abnormal maternal behavior was exhibited in mice lacking the δGABAA subunit (Maguire & Mody, 2008). There is also evidence that δGABAA subunit expression occurs at higher levels in the hippocampus of socially isolated compared with socially housed male rats (Serra et al., 2006). Beyond these studies, however, little is known about the effects of the social environment on the expression of extrasynaptic δGABAA receptors or their role in the regulation of social behavior. This is likely due to the fact that only recently have δ extrasynaptic GABAA receptors, along with other non-traditional GABAA receptors been identified and characterized. Although our data suggests that social experience modulates the ratio of δ extrasynaptic and γ2 synaptic GABAA receptor mRNA, it remains important to examine the receptor protein itself because mRNA expression does not always correlate with protein expression of these receptors (Walton, McNeill, Oliver, & Albers, 2017). For example, it is possible that there might be sex differences in the receptor proteins despite their absence in mRNA expression. Furthermore, caution should also be used in interpreting the data from the use of subtype specific GABAA receptor agonists and antagonists because these studies were conducted only in males and because of the sometimes-controversial pharmacological properties and selectivity of the drugs used (Albers et al., 2017; Hanchar et al., 2006; Mortensen, Ebert, Wafford, & Smart, 2010; Wallner, Hanchar, & Olsen, 2014). For example, benzodiazepines such as CDP are positive modulators at γ2 subunit containing GABAA receptors and their effects may be influence by GABA tone and Ro 15–4513 has be considered a partial inverse agonist that may have effects on GABAA receptors that do not contain γ2 subunits. Nevertheless, these data indicate that social experience can have profound effects on social behavior and the neuronal mechanisms mediating aggression, especially in males and also suggest that δ extrasynaptic GABAA receptors may be an important therapeutic target (Brickley & Mody, 2012).

5. Conclusions

These data demonstrate that activation of GABAA receptors specifically within the dorsal lateral septum, but not other subregions of the septum increases aggression in male and female hamsters. In males, but not females, social housing, significantly decreased the ability of GABAA receptor activation to induce aggression. Social housing decreased the ratio of extrasynaptic to synaptic subunit GABAA receptor mRNA expression in the anterior dorsal lateral septum and activation of extrasynaptic, but not synaptic GABAA receptors in the dorsal lateral septum increased aggression. We conclude that social experience can have profound effects on the neuronal mechanisms mediating aggression, especially in males, and that δ extrasynaptic GABAA receptors may be an important therapeutic target for disorders characterized by high levels of aggression.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health under award number F31MH113367 to JMB, F32NS092545 to JCW, R01MH109302 and R01MH110212 to HEA, and funds from the Brains and Behavior Program at Georgia State University. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or Georgia State University. The authors declare no competing interests. We thank Dr. Joseph I. Terranova for his assistance with these experiments.

Abbreviations

GABAAR

GABAA receptor

dLS

dorsal lateral septum

adLS

anterior dorsal lateral septum

CDP

chlordiazepoxide

THIP

gaboxadol

MS

medial septum

Footnotes

6. Financial disclosures

None of the authors have any financial arrangements or potential conflicts of interest to report.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This Author Accepted Manuscript is a PDF file of a an unedited peer-reviewed manuscript that has been accepted for publication but has not been copyedited or corrected. The official version of record that is published in the journal is kept up to date and so may therefore differ from this version.

References

  1. Albers HE (2012). The regulation of social recognition, social communication and aggression: vasopressin in the social behavior neural network. Horm Behav, 61(3), 283–292. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Albers HE (2015). Species, sex and individual differences in the vasotocin/vasopressin system: relationship to neurochemical signaling in the social behavior neural network. Front Neuroendocrinol, 36, 49–71. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2014.07.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Albers HE, & Bamshad M (1998). Role of vasopressin and oxytocin in the control of social behavior in Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Prog Brain Res, 119, 395–408. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10074802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Albers HE, Walton JC, Gamble KL, McNeill J. K. t., & Hummer DL (2017). The dynamics of GABA signaling: Revelations from the circadian pacemaker in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Front Neuroendocrinol, 44, 35–82. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2016.11.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Alvarez DD, Giacomini D, Yang SM, Trinchero MF, Temprana SG, Buttner KA, … Schinder AF (2016). A disynaptic feedback network activated by experience promotes the integration of new granule cells. Science, 354(6311), 459–465. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Belelli D, Harrison NL, Maguire J, Macdonald RL, Walker MC, & Cope DW (2009). Extrasynaptic GABAA receptors: form, pharmacology, and function. J Neurosci, 29(41), 12757–12763. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3340-09.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brain PF (1972a). Effects of isolation on adrenocortical and gonadal function in male and female golden hamsters. J Endocrinol, 53(3), 62–63. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5064673 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brain PF (1972b). Effects of isolation/grouping on endocrine function and fighting behavior in male and female golden hamsters. (Mesocricetus auratus Waterhouse). Behav Biol, 7(3), 349–357. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5063900 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bredewold R, Schiavo JK, van der Hart M, Verreij M, & Veenema AH (2015). Dynamic changes in extracellular release of GABA and glutamate in the lateral septum during social play behavior in juvenile rats: Implications for sex-specific regulation of social play behavior. Neuroscience, 307, 117–127. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.08.052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brickley SG, & Mody I (2012). Extrasynaptic GABA(A) receptors: their function in the CNS and implications for disease. Neuron, 73(1), 23–34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown N, Kerby J, Bonnert TP, Whiting PJ, & Wafford KA (2002). Pharmacological characterization of a novel cell line expressing human alpha(4)beta(3)delta GABA(A) receptors. Br J Pharmacol, 136(7), 965–974. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chang CH, Hsiao YH, Chen YW, Yu YJ, & Gean PW (2015). Social isolation-induced increase in NMDA receptors in the hippocampus exacerbates emotional dysregulation in mice. Hippocampus, 25(4), 474–485. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dar MS (2001). Modulation of ethanol-induced motor incoordination by mouse striatal A(1) adenosinergic receptor. Brain Res Bull, 55(4), 513–520. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11543952 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. DaVanzo JP, Chamberlain J, & McConnaughey MM (1986). Influence of environment on GABA receptors in muricidal rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 25(1), 95–98. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3018798 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. De Vries GJ (2004). Minireview: Sex differences in adult and developing brains: compensation, compensation, compensation. Endocrinology, 145(3), 1063–1068. doi: 10.1210/en.2003-1504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Delville Y, De Vries GJ, & Ferris CF (2000). Neural connections of the anterior hypothalamus and agonistic behavior in golden hamsters. Brain Behav Evol, 55(2), 53–76. doi: 10.1159/000006642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Depaulis A, & Vergnes M (1983). Induction of mouse-killing in the rat by intraventricular injection of a GABA-agonist. Physiol Behav, 30(3), 383–388. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6683411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Depaulis A, & Vergnes M (1985). Elicitation of conspecific attack or defense in the male rat by intraventricular injection of a GABA agonist or antagonist. Physiol Behav, 35(3), 447–453. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2999844 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Drickamer LC, & Vandenbergh JG (1973). Predictors of social dominance in the adult female golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). Anim Behav, 21(3), 564–570. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4795936 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Drickamer LC, Vandenbergh JG, & Colby DR (1973). Predictors of dominance in the male golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). Anim Behav, 21(3), 557–563. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4795935 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ehlen JC, & Paul KN (2009). Regulation of light’s action in the mammalian circadian clock: role of the extrasynaptic GABAA receptor. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol, 296(5), R1606–1612. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.90878.2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Farrant M, & Nusser Z (2005). Variations on an inhibitory theme: phasic and tonic activation of GABA(A) receptors. Nat Rev Neurosci, 6(3), 215–229. doi: 10.1038/nrn1625 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ferris CF, Delville Y, Irvin RW, & Potegal M (1994). Septo-hypothalamic organization of a stereotyped behavior controlled by vasopressin in golden hamsters. Physiol Behav, 55(4), 755–759. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8190806 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Frye GD, McCown TJ, & Breese GR (1983). Characterization of susceptibility to audiogenic seizures in ethanol-dependent rats after microinjection of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) agonists into the inferior colliculus, substantia nigra or medial septum. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 227(3), 663–670. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6317842 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gray CL, Norvelle A, Larkin T, & Huhman KL (2015). Dopamine in the nucleus accumbens modulates the memory of social defeat in Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Behav Brain Res, 286, 22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.02.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Grimes JM, Ricci LA, & Melloni RH Jr. (2003). Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) immunoreactivity in brains of aggressive, adolescent anabolic steroid-treated hamsters. Horm Behav, 44(3), 271–280. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14609549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Han S, Tai C, Westenbroek RE, Yu FH, Cheah CS, Potter GB, … Catterall WA (2012). Autistic-like behaviour in Scn1a+/− mice and rescue by enhanced GABA-mediated neurotransmission. Nature, 489(7416), 385–390. doi: 10.1038/nature11356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hanchar HJ, Chutsrinopkun P, Meera P, Supavilai P, Sieghart W, Wallner M, & Olsen RW (2006). Ethanol potently and competitively inhibits binding of the alcohol antagonist Ro15–4513 to alpha4/6beta3delta GABAA receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 103(22), 8546–8551. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509903103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Harmon AC, Moore TO, Huhman KL, & Albers HE (2002). Social experience and social context alter the behavioral response to centrally administered oxytocin in female Syrian hamsters. Neuroscience, 109(4), 767–772. Retrieved from PM:11927158 http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0306452201005231/1s2.0S0306452201005231-main.pdf?_tid=058ecb1a-452211e69c3100000aacb35d&acdnat=14679924905807aba66432699e58f29ae78c3df62f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Huhman KL, Solomon MB, Janicki M, Harmon AC, Lin SM, Israel JE, & Jasnow AM (2003). Conditioned defeat in male and female Syrian hamsters. Horm Behav, 44(3), 293–299. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14609551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Irvin RW, Szot P, Dorsa DM, Potegal M, & Ferris CF (1990). Vasopressin in the septal area of the golden hamster controls scent marking and grooming. Physiol Behav, 48(5), 693–699. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2082369 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee G, & Gammie SC (2009). GABA(A) receptor signaling in the lateral septum regulates maternal aggression in mice. Behav Neurosci, 123(6), 1169–1177. doi: 10.1037/a0017535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lee V, & Maguire J (2014). The impact of tonic GABAA receptor-mediated inhibition on neuronal excitability varies across brain region and cell type. Front Neural Circuits, 8, 3. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2014.00003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Leroy F, Park J, Asok A, Brann DH, Meira T, Boyle LM, … Siegelbaum SA (2018). A circuit from hippocampal CA2 to lateral septum disinhibits social aggression. Nature, 564(7735), 213–218. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0772 0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Locci A, & Pinna G (2018). Social isolation as a promising animal model of PTSD comorbid suicide: neurosteroids and cannabinoids as possible treatment options. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry, 92, 243–259. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.12.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Maguire J, & Mody I (2008). GABA(A)R plasticity during pregnancy: relevance to postpartum depression. Neuron, 59(2), 207–213. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.06.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. McCann KE, Sinkiewicz DM, Rosenhauer AM, Beach LQ, & Huhman KL (2018). Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Sex-Dependent Expression Patterns in the Basolateral Amygdala of Dominant and Subordinate Animals After Acute Social Conflict. Mol Neurobiol. doi: 10.1007/s12035-018-1339-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. McDonald MM, Markham CM, Norvelle A, Albers HE, & Huhman KL (2012). GABAA receptor activation in the lateral septum reduces the expression of conditioned defeat and increases aggression in Syrian hamsters. Brain Res, 1439, 27–33. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.12.042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. McElroy B, Zakaria A, Glass JD, & Prosser RA (2009). Ethanol modulates mammalian circadian clock phase resetting through extrasynaptic GABA receptor activation. Neuroscience, 164(2), 842–848. Retrieved from PM:19695310 http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0306452209013384/1-s2.0S0306452209013384-main.pdf?_tid=058c842e453e11e6-8cf5-00000aab0f6b&acdnat=1468004516e8a42238ce6fb3bb28474108cae42a95 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Melon LC, & Boehm SL 2nd. (2011). GABAA receptors in the posterior, but not anterior, ventral tegmental area mediate Ro15–4513-induced attenuation of binge-like ethanol consumption in C57BL/6J female mice. Behav Brain Res, 220(1), 230–237. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.02.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mohler H (2015). The legacy of the benzodiazepine receptor: from flumazenil to enhancing cognition in Down syndrome and social interaction in autism. Adv Pharmacol, 72, 1–36. doi: 10.1016/bs.apha.2014.10.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Morin LP, & Wood RI (2001). A stereotaxic atlas of the golden hamster brain. San Diego, Calif.; London: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  43. Morrison KE, Bader LR, Clinard CT, Gerhard DM, Gross SE, & Cooper MA (2014). Maintenance of dominance status is necessary for resistance to social defeat stress in Syrian hamsters. Behav Brain Res, 270, 277–286. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.05.041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mortensen M, Ebert B, Wafford K, & Smart TG (2010). Distinct activities of GABA agonists at synaptic- and extrasynaptic-type GABAA receptors. J Physiol, 588(Pt 8), 1251–1268. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.182444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Nelson RJ, & Trainor BC (2007). Neural mechanisms of aggression. Nat Rev Neurosci, 8(7), 536–546. doi: 10.1038/nrn2174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Potegal M, Perumal AS, Barkai AI, Cannova GE, & Blau AD (1982). GABA binding in the brains of aggressive and non-aggressive female hamsters. Brain Res, 247(2), 315–324. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6889905 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Potegal M, Yoburn B, & Glusman M (1983). Disinhibition of muricide and irritability by intraseptal muscimol. Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 19(4), 663–669. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6685877 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Primus RJ, & Kellogg CK (1991). Experience influences environmental modulation of function at the benzodiazepine (BZD)/GABA receptor chloride channel complex. Brain Res, 545(1 2), 257–264. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1713526 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Risold PY, & Swanson LW (1997a). Chemoarchitecture of the rat lateral septal nucleus. Brain Res Brain Res Rev, 24(2 3), 91–113. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9385453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Risold PY, & Swanson LW (1997b). Connections of the rat lateral septal complex. Brain Res Brain Res Rev, 24(2 3), 115–195. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9385454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Ross AP, Norvelle A, Choi DC, Walton JC, Albers HE, & Huhman KL (2017). Social housing and social isolation: Impact on stress indices and energy balance in male and female Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Physiol Behav, 177, 264–269. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.05.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Saldivar-Gonzalez A, Gomez C, Martinez-Lomeli I, & Arias C (2000). Effect of flumazenil and diazepam on transient actions in defensive burying elicited by the social interaction experience in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 66(2), 265–273. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10880678 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Serra M, Mostallino MC, Talani G, Pisu MG, Carta M, Mura ML, … Biggio G (2006). Social isolation-induced increase in alpha and delta subunit gene expression is associated with a greater efficacy of ethanol on steroidogenesis and GABA receptor function. J Neurochem, 98(1), 122–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03850.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sesarini CV, Costa L, Naymark M, Granana N, Cajal AR, Garcia Coto M, … Argibay PF (2014). Evidence for interaction between markers in GABA(A) receptor subunit genes in an Argentinean autism spectrum disorder population. Autism Res, 7(1), 162–166. doi: 10.1002/aur.1353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sieghart W, & Sperk G (2002). Subunit composition, distribution and function of GABA(A) receptor subtypes. Curr Top Med Chem, 2(8), 795–816. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12171572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sigel E, & Steinmann ME (2012). Structure, function, and modulation of GABA(A) receptors. J Biol Chem, 287(48), 40224–40231. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R112.386664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Simler S, Puglisi-Allegra S, & Mandel P (1982). gamma-Aminobutyric acid in brain areas of isolated aggressive or non-aggressive inbred strains of mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 16(1), 57–61. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7199186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Snyder-Mackler N, Sanz J, Kohn JN, Brinkworth JF, Morrow S, Shaver AO, … Tung J (2016). Social status alters immune regulation and response to infection in macaques. Science, 354(6315), 1041–1045. doi: 10.1126/science.aah3580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Suomi SJ, Harlow HF, & Kimball SD (1971). Behavioral effects of prolonged partial social isolation in the rhesus monkey. Psychol Rep, 29(3), 1171–1177. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1971.29.3f.1171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Swanson LW, & Cowan WM (1979). The connections of the septal region in the rat. J Comp Neurol, 186(4), 621–655. doi: 10.1002/cne.901860408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Terranova JI, Song Z, Larkin TE 2nd, Hardcastle N, Norvelle A, Riaz A, & Albers HE (2016). Serotonin and arginine-vasopressin mediate sex differences in the regulation of dominance and aggression by the social brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 113(46), 13233–13238. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1610446113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Tremblay RE (2014). Early development of physical aggression and early risk factors for chronic physical aggression in humans. Curr Top Behav Neurosci, 17, 315–327. doi: 10.1007/7854_2013_262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wallner M, Hanchar HJ, & Olsen RW (2014). Alcohol selectivity of beta3-containing GABAA receptors: evidence for a unique extracellular alcohol/imidazobenzodiazepine Ro15 4513 binding site at the alpha+beta− subunit interface in alphabeta3delta GABAA receptors. Neurochem Res, 39(6), 1118–1126. doi: 10.1007/s11064-014-1243-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Walton JC, McNeill J. K. t., Oliver KA, & Albers HE (2017). Temporal Regulation of GABAA Receptor Subunit Expression: Role in Synaptic and Extrasynaptic Communication in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus. eNeuro, 4(2). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0352-16.2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Wise DA (1974). Aggression in the female golden hamster: effects of reproductive state and social isolation. Horm Behav, 5(3), 235–250. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4474137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Young LJ, & Pfaff DW (2014). Sex differences in neurological and psychiatric disorders. Front Neuroendocrinol, 35(3), 253–254. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2014.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES