Skip to main content
Comparative Medicine logoLink to Comparative Medicine
. 2020 Feb;70(1):16–24. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-CM-19-000009

Lack of Effect of Murine Norovirus Infection on the CD4+CD45RBhigh T-cell Adoptive Transfer Mouse Model of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Charlie C Hsu 1,*, Karuna Patil 1,, Audrey Seamons 1, Thea L Brabb 1, Piper M Treuting 1, Jisun Paik 1, Stacey M Meeker 1,, Lillian Maggio-Price 1
PMCID: PMC7024779  PMID: 31937392

Abstract

Murine norovirus (MNV) infection is highly prevalent in laboratory mice. Although MNV infection does not typically induce clinical disease in most laboratory mice, infection may nonetheless affect mouse models of disease by altering immune responses. We previously reported that MNV altered the bacterial-induced mouse model of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) using Helicobacter-infected Mdr1a−/− mice. Therefore, we hypothesized that MNV infection would exacerbate another mouse model of IBD, the T-cell adoptive transfer (AT) model. In this model, Helicobacter infection is used to accelerate the progression of IBD induced by AT of naïve CD4+CD45RBhigh T cells into B6.129S7-Rag1tm1Mom/J (Rag1−/−) mice. We evaluated the effects of MNV infection in both Helicobacter-accelerated as well as Helicobacter-free AT models. In our studies, Helicobacter-infected Rag1−/− mice that received CD4+CD45RBhigh T cells through AT rapidly developed weight loss and typhlocolitis; MNV infection had no effect on disease severity or rate of progression. In the absence of Helicobacter infection, progression of IBD caused by AT of CD4+CD45RBhigh T cells was slower and typhlocolitis was less severe; this inflammation likewise was unaltered by MNV infection. These results indicate that MNV infection does not alter IBD progression and severity in the CD4+CD45RBhigh T-cell AT model in Rag1−/− mice.

Abbreviations: AT, AT; CFSE, carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; MNV, murine norovirus


Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a progressive and multifactorial disease that affects millions of people.38 The pathogenesis of the disease is still not understood, but a combination of poorly regulated immune responses, genetics, and host microbiota are involved.1 Murine models of IBD have been instrumental tools to further our understanding of factors that drive disease development and progression as well as to investigate potential preventatives and therapeutics. The adoptive transfer (AT) model, induced by transferring naïve CD4+CD45RBhigh T cells into a lymphopenic host, is a well-characterized mouse model of IBD in which typhlocolitis is the result of disrupted T-cell homeostasis.10,24,39,44,49 Therefore, this model has been used extensively to help determine factors that influence the onset, severity, and penetrance of bowel inflammation triggered by aberrant T-cell responses.

Murine norovirus (MNV) is a highly prevalent enteric RNA virus of laboratory mice that does not induce clinical disease in many stocks and strains of mice.4,20,43 It has been shown to alter some mouse models of disease but produces only minimal changes in others.5,14,16,18,46 For example, our laboratory previously reported that MNV infection exacerbates IBD progression in Helicobacter bilis-infected Mdr1a−/− mice (FVB.129P2-Abcb1atm1Bor) but does not cause changes in IBD scores or colon tumor incidence in Smad3−/− mice (129-Smad3tm1Par/J).28,29 The effect of MNV infection on IBD has also been studied in Il10−/− mice with mixed results depending on the background strain of the mouse: mice on a C57BL/6J background (B6.129P2-Il10tm1Cgn/J or JZtm) had no changes in cecal and colonic inflammation,17 whereas mice on a C3H/HeJBir background (C3Bir.129P2-Il10tm1Cgn/JZtm) showed increased colonic inflammation at 4 wk after MNV infection.5 These mixed results highlight the importance of evaluating the effects of MNV on mouse models of IBD to determine its potential to confound research findings.

This study investigated whether MNV affected colitis development in the T-cell AT model of IBD. Enteric organisms are known to influence the severity and progression of disease in the AT model. In this model, naïve T cells adoptively transferred into lymphopenic recipient mice proliferate extensively in response to the lymphopenic conditions, and gut microbes appear to play a significant role in disease development by eliciting an uncontrolled inflammatory response.10,24,26,42,49 Adoptive transfer of CD4+CD45RBhigh T cells into germ-free mice, monocolonized or reduced-enteric flora mice, or mice treated with antibiotics results in absent or significantly reduced disease,3,21,33,37,45 whereas the presence of Helicobacter spp. can accelerate disease development in mice with normal enteric flora.7,30 Because Helicobacter is a common enteric bacteria in laboratory mice, we evaluated the effect of MNV infection on the AT model of IBD using H. bilis to accelerate disease development and on this model of IBD without H. bilis. We determined that MNV infection does not significantly alter the AT mouse model of IBD.

Materials and Methods

Animals.

Female recombination-activating gene 1 knockout (Rag1−/−, B6.129S7-Rag1tm1Mom/J) and C57BL/6J mice (age, 6 to 8 wk) were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) for experiments evaluating IBD. To evaluate T-cell proliferation, male Thy1.1 C57BL/6J mice (B6.PL-Thy1a/CyJ, The Jackson Laboratory) and male Rag1−/− mice (age, 10 to 12 wk) were bred inhouse and used. Mice were housed in autoclaved IVC (Thoren, Hazleton, PA) with autoclaved corncob bedding (The Andersons, Maumee, OH) in an SPF facility and were fed standard irradiated chow (PicoLab Rodent Diet 20, 5053, PMI Nutrition, St Louis, MO) without restriction. Autoclaved, reverse-osmosis–purified, acidified water was provided in bottles without restriction. Mice were certified by the vendor to be free of specific rodent pathogens including ectoparasites, endoparasites, Pneumocystis murina, Helicobacter spp., known enteric and respiratory bacterial pathogens and antibodies to MNV, mouse hepatitis virus, Sendai virus, pneumonia virus of mice, reovirus 3, Theiler murine encephalomyelitis virus, ectromelia virus, polyoma virus, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus, mouse adenovirus, minute virus of mice, mouse parvovirus, mouse rotavirus, mouse cytomegalovirus, mouse thymic virus, Hantaan virus, K virus, Encephalitozoon cuniculi, cilia-associated respiratory bacillus, Mycoplasma pulmonis, and Clostridium piliforme. Mice were maintained under SPF conditions and group-housed. During experimental infections with MNV and H. bilis, mice were handled according to infection status to prevent cross-contamination. All manipulations were performed in a vertical flow animal transfer station (AniGard II, Baker, Sanford, ME) disinfected with chlorine dioxide (dilution, 1:18:1; Clidox S, Pharmacal Research Laboratories, Naugatuck, CT). All animal procedures were approved by the University of Washington's IACUC.

Experimental infection and AT.

H. bilis and MNV4 (passage 7) were grown and propagated as previously described.17 Prior to experimental manipulations, mice were acclimated for at least 1 wk and confirmed to be negative for MNV and Helicobacter spp. through RT-PCR and PCR analyses, respectively. At the end of each study, MNV and H. bilis infection status was confirmed through fecal RT-PCR and PCR analyses, respectively, as previously described.17

To evaluate MNV infection in the AT model of IBD accelerated by H. bilis infection, 8-wk-old female Rag1−/− mice (n = 33) were given 2 × 107 cfu of H. bilis in 0.2 mL of Brucella broth by oral gavage at 5 d prior to AT. For the AT, all mice (n = 33) were intraperitoneally injected with 1.3 × 105 CD4+CD45RBhigh cells, obtained through FACS of cells from syngeneic female C57BL/6J donor mice. At 3 d after the AT, the mice were split into 2 groups—one group (n = 17) was infected with 1 × 106 pfu of MNV4 through oral gavage, whereas the other group (n = 16) was sham-inoculated with 0.2 mL of uninfected clarified RAW 264.7 cell lysate. Mice were weighed at least twice each week. Animals that lost 20% or more of their baseline weight were euthanized by using an inhaled overdose of carbon dioxide gas and necropsied; the entire study was terminated when 50% of the mice within an experimental group reached this weight loss criterion. This study termination criterion was used to attempt to balance our ability to observe altered time to disease development as well as to discern differences in histologic disease severity between groups at a specific time point.

To evaluate MNV infection in the AT model of IBD without H. bilis, 8-wk-old female Rag1−/− mice were intraperitoneally injected with 1.3 × 105 CD4+CD45RBhigh cells and infected with MNV4 either prior to or after AT. Mice infected prior to AT received 1 × 106 pfu of MNV4 by oral gavage at 7 d before AT (MNV–AT group), whereas mice infected after AT received 1 × 106 pfu of MNV4 by oral gavage at 3 d after AT (AT–MNV group). Sham inoculations were performed by oral gavage of uninfected clarified RAW 264.7 cell lysates. Within the experiment, all mice received the same number (that is, 2) of oral gavages; when one group (for example, MNV–AT group) received MNV4 by gavage, all remaining mice in the other 2 groups (for example, control and AT–MNV groups) received sham inoculations. This experiment was performed 3 times, with 12 to 17 mice per group. Mice were weighed at least once weekly. Animals that lost 20% or more of their baseline weight were euthanized with an inhaled overdose of carbon dioxide gas and necropsied. Additional euthanasia criteria in these experiments included animals that developed marked clinical signs, such as severe dermatitis, blepharitis, and respiratory distress. The entire study was terminated when 50% of the mice within an experimental group reached these euthanasia criteria.

To evaluate MNV infection on T-cell proliferation after AT into a lymphopenic host, isoflurane-anesthetized 10- to 12-wk-old male Rag1−/− mice received through retroorbital injection 1 × 106 CD4+ T cells that had been labeled with carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE). The CD4+ T cells were obtained from the spleens of donor male Thy1.1 C57BL/6J mice by using negative selection (CD4+ T Cell Isolation Kit II, Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) and then stained with 5 μM CFSE (CellTrace CFSE Cell Proliferation Kit, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). One group of mice (n = 3) was infected with 1 × 106 pfu of MNV4 through oral gavage at 2 d before AT of CFSE-labeled CD4+ T cells, whereas another group (n = 3) was infected 3 d after AT. Control animals (n = 4) received CFSE-labeled CD4+ T cells but were sham-gavaged with uninfected RAW 264.7 cell lysate. Mice were euthanized by an inhaled overdose of carbon dioxide gas at 5 d after AT. Splenocytes from these mice were stained with antibodies specific for CD4 (RM4-5; eBioscience, San Diego, CA) and CD90.1/Thy1.1 (OX7; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and evaluated by FACS. Single-cell lymphocytes were gated according to forward and side light scatter and then antibody surface markers to obtain CD4+Thy1.1+ cells. T-cell proliferation in the CD4+Thy1.1+ cell population was evaluated through CFSE expression, similar to methods previously described,11 to differentiate cells that were undergoing spontaneous proliferation or homeostatic proliferation or that remained undivided.

Histopathology and inflammation scoring.

The cecum and colon were collected, processed, and scored for IBD through histologic exam, as previously described.17 Additional tissues including lung, esophagus, stomach, liver, and small intestine were immersion-fixed in 10% phosphate-buffered formalin and prepared for routine histologic exam.

FACS.

To isolate CD4+CD45RBhigh cells, single-cell suspensions were generated from the spleens of 8-wk-old, female, syngeneic C57BL/6J mice. RBC were lysed, and CD4+ cells were isolated through negative selection (CD4+ T Cell Isolation Kit II, Miltenyi Biotec). CD4+-enriched cells were blocked with antiCD16/CD32 antibody (2.4G2, BD Biosciences) and then stained with antiCD4 (RM4-5; eBioscience), antiTCRβ (H57-597; BD Biosciences), and antiCD45RB (16A; BD Biosciences) antibodies. FACS was performed (FACSAria II, BD Biosciences) to obtain TCRβ+CD4+CD45RBhigh cells (Figure 1) The purities of sorted cells exceeded 98% for all AT experiments.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Collection of cells and sorting gate strategy to isolate CD4+CD45RBhigh T cells for AT.

Statistical analysis.

Statistical analyses were performed by using Prism version 5 or 6 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). The unpaired Student t test or Mann–Whitney test was used to compare 2 groups. For more than 2 groups, one-way ANOVA with the Tukey multiple comparisons test or the Kruskal–Wallis test with the Dunn multiple-comparisons test was used to compare IBD scores and T-cell proliferation, whereas 2-way ANOVA with the Tukey multiple-comparisons test was used to compare body weight at each time point. Survival curves were evaluated by using the Mantel–Cox log-rank test. Average weights were calculated from surviving mice within each group at each time point. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Lack of MNV4-induced effect on typhlocolitis in the Helicobacter-accelerated T-cell AT model of IBD.

We first sought to determine whether MNV infection altered typhlocolitis in the H. bilis-accelerated T-cell AT model of IBD. Rag1−/− mice all received CD4+CD45RBhigh T cells to induce colitis and H. bilis to accelerate disease, and then mice were split into 2 groups to compare MNV4-infected mice with sham-infected controls. As expected, mice developed clinical signs consistent with IBD, including diarrhea, weight loss (Figure 2 A) and decreased survival (Figure 2 B) beginning approximately 2 to 3 wk after AT. At 4 wk after AT, the study was terminated, and large bowel inflammation was evaluated by histopathology. Average percentage of weight change from baseline did not differ significantly at any time point between mice infected with MNV4 compared with mice without MNV4. Neither percent survival nor IBD score (Figure 2 C) differed between mice infected with MNV4 compared with those without MNV4. These data suggest that MNV4 infection does not alter the H. bilis-accelerated T-cell AT model of IBD.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

MNV4 does not alter (A) weight loss, (B) survival, or (C) IBD score in the CD4+CD45RBhigh T-cell AT mouse model of IBD using a bacterial accelerator of inflammation, H. bilis. All Rag1−/− mice were inoculated with H. bilis 5 d before AT of CD4+CD45RBhigh T cells and then infected with MNV4 (n = 17) or mock infected (n = 16) at 3 d after AT. Data are given as mean ± SEM (error bars). AT, adoptive transfer.

Lack of MNV4-induced effect on typhlocolitis in the Helicobacter-free T-cell AT model of IBD.

Because H. bilis infection in the T-cell AT model of IBD results in rapid and severe disease development, we reasoned that the severe disease might mask any subtle effects of MNV4 on inflammation. Therefore, we tested whether MNV4 infection altered this model of IBD in the absence of H. bilis. In addition, we determined whether the timing of MNV4 infection differentially influenced disease development by testing 2 infection time points relative to AT (that is, 7 d before and 3 d after AT) and compared these treatment groups with animals that received AT only.

In our initial study, control animals and mice infected with MNV4 after AT (AT–MNV group) began to lose weight at approximately 15 wk after AT, and the average percent weight change was significantly different between the 2 groups beginning at week 22 after AT until the end of study (P ≤ 0.026 for each weekly comparison) (Figure 3 A) Mice administered MNV4 prior to AT (MNV–AT group) continued to gain weight throughout the study, and the average percent weight change was significantly different from control mice beginning at week 18 (P = 0.0232), at endpoint (P = 0.0067), and intermittently between these time points (P ≤ 0.0254 for each weekly comparison). However, there were no significant differences between any of the groups when comparing survival (Figure 3 B) or IBD scores (Figure 3 C). Because the clinical assessment of weight loss suggested a potential difference between groups that was not supported by the survival and IBD scores, we performed 2 additional experiments to validate our findings. In the second study, the average percent weight change for all groups began to decrease beginning at approximately 10 wk after AT, with significant differences between control and AT–MNV groups at week 15 (P = 0.0443) and at endpoint only (P = 0.0104) (Figure 3 D). Similar to the initial study, there were no differences between any of the groups in survival (Figure 3 E) or IBD scores (Figure 3 F). In the final study, the average percent weight change was significantly different between the MNV–AT and control groups from week 8 through 11 (P ≤ 0.0405 for each weekly comparison) and between the control and AT–MNV groups from week 11 until endpoint (P ≤ 0.035 for each weekly comparison) (Figure 3 G). Again, neither survival (Figure 3 H) nor IBD score (Figure 3 I) differed between any of the groups. Collectively, the results from these 3 independent experiments indicate that MNV4 infection does not alter IBD in the T-cell AT model of colitis.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Effects of MNV4 on (A, D, and G) weight loss, (B, E, and H) survival, and (C, F and I) IBD score in the CD4+CD45RBhigh T-cell AT mouse model of IBD in the absence of an accelerator of inflammation, H. bilis. Rag1−/− mice were infected with MNV4 at 7 d before AT of CD4+CD45RBhigh T cells (MNV–AT), infected 3 d after AT (AT–MNV), or mock-infected (control). Results of 3 independent experiments are shown: (A through C) study 1 (n = 12 mice per group); (D through F) study 2 (n = 13 to 17 mice per group), and (G through I) study 3 (n = 12 mice per group). Statistical differences between groups in percent weight change from baseline: (A) MNV–AT compared with control: weeks 18 through 22 and 24 until endpoint; control compared with AT–MNV: weeks 22 to endpoint; MNV–AT compared with AT–MNV: week 18 to endpoint. (D) Control compared with AT–MNV: week 15 and endpoint. (G) MNV–AT compared with control: weeks 8 through 11; control compared with AT–MNV, week 11 to endpoint; MNV–AT compared with AT–MNV, weeks 9 and 12. Data are given as mean ± SEM (error bars). AT, adoptive transfer.

Lack of MNV4-induced effect on T-cell proliferation after AT.

Cell expansion occurs in lymphopenic mice after AT with CD4+ or CD4+CD45RBhigh T cells.11,25,32,34,39,42 To determine whether MNV infection altered T-cell proliferation after AT, splenic Thy1.1+CD4+ T cells labeled with CFSE were adoptively transferred into recipient Rag1−/− mice that had been infected with MNV4 either 2 d before or 3 d after AT. Cells transferred into sham-infected mice served as controls. CFSE dilution of AT T cells in recipient splenocytes was evaluated by flow cytometry to determine whether T cells remained undivided or underwent spontaneous or homeostatic proliferation (Figure 4 A). The percentage of CD4+Thy1.1+ T cells that remained undivided or that underwent spontaneous or homeostatic proliferation did not differ between MNV4-infected animals compared with sham-infected controls (Figure 4 B). These results indicate that MNV4 infection does not alter CD4 T-cell proliferation after AT.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Effects of MNV4 on CD4+ T-cell proliferation after AT into Rag1−/− mice. Mice were infected with MNV4 at 2 d before AT of CSFE-labeled CD4+ T cells (n = 3, MNV–AT), 3 d after AT (n = 3, AT–MNV), or were mock infected (n = 4, control). (A) CD4+Thy1.1+ splenic cells were evaluated for CFSE expression at 5 d after AT to assess whether cells were undergoing spontaneous or homeostatic proliferation or remained undivided (a representative sample from each group is shown; histogram overlays are normalized to the total area under the curve). (B) MNV4 does not alter CD4+ T-cell proliferation compared with uninfected controls. Data are given as mean ± SEM (error bars). AT, adoptive transfer; HP, homeostatic proliferation; SP, spontaneous proliferation.

Inflammation is induced in extracolonic tissues of mice that received T-cell AT.

During the evaluation of MNV4 infection in the T-cell AT model of IBD without H. bilis, we observed inflammation independent of MNV4 infection status in several extracolonic organs of the mice (Table 1 and Figure 5) Clinically, the inflammatory lesions were most evident as multifocal ulcerative dermatitis, blepharitis (unilateral or bilateral; affecting both upper and lower eyelids), and occasional respiratory signs, such as increased respiratory rate and effort at rest and delayed recovery of normal respiration after handling. Histologically, in addition to inflammation in the cecum and colon, inflammation was noted in other digestive and nondigestive tissues, including the lungs, esophagus, stomach, small intestine, and liver. Pulmonary lesions consisted of pyogranulomatous foci composed of numerous multinucleated giant cells and multifocal accumulations of neutrophils, pulmonary artery medial hyperplasia, moderate perivascular and peribronchiolar inflammation, medial and epithelial hyperplasia, and foci of acidophilic macrophage pneumonia (Figure 5 A through B and data not shown). The distal esophagus had proliferative lymphohistiocytic and neutrophilic esophagitis (Figure 5 C), and the stomach showed hyperplasia and early delamination of the mucosa near the limiting ridge of the nonglandular area (data not shown), and the glandular stomach had moderate mucosal lymphocytic accumulations (Figure 5 D). Mild lymphocytic and proliferative enteritis was present in the duodenum (Figure 5 E). The liver showed mild inflammation and early fibrosis in centrilobular and periportal regions, with periportal lymphocytic and lesser fibrosing cholangiohepatitis (Figure 5 F). Although the primary purpose of this mouse model is to study IBD, these findings demonstrate that inflammation of nontarget tissues can occur in these mice and may need to be considered.

Table 1.

Incidence of extracolonic inflammation in mice in the T-cell AT model of IBD without H. bilis

Study 1
Study 2
Study 3
MNV–AT Control AT–MNV MNV–AT Control AT–MNV MNV–AT Control AT–MNV
Skin 2/12 4/12 4/12 1/13 3/17 1/14 0/12 2/12 0/12
Eyelids 2/12 4/12 1/12 2/13 2/17 4/14 4/12 6/12 3/12
Lung 11/11 12/12 11/11 13/13 17/17 13/14 12/12 12/12 12/12
Stomach 11/11 12/12 11/11 13/13 16/17 13/14 12/12 12/12 11/12
Small intestine 10/11 11/12 11/11 nd nd nd nd nd nd
Esophagus 9/11 12/12 11/11 12/13 15/16 8/10 7/11 12/12 5/12

nd, not done

Data are provided as the number of mice with inflammation / total number of mice available for analysis

Data for skin and eyelids are based on clinical observation; those for lung, stomach, small intestine, and esophagus were based on histologic evaluation

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Lymphohistiocytic and neutrophilic inflammatory infiltrates present at the mucosal–submucosal interface and within the epithelium, lamina propria, and submucosa. (A) Moderately affected lung. (B) Bronchiole from lung in panel A, showing epithelial hyalinization and peribronchiolar and perivascular mixed inflammatory infiltrate. (C) Distal esophagus. Proliferative and lymphohistiocytic and neutrophilic esophagitis. (D) Glandular stomach. Mild to moderate mucosal lymphocytic accumulation. (E) Duodenum. Mild lymphocytic and minimal proliferative enteritis. (F) Liver. Mild periportal lymphocytic and minimal fibrosing cholangiohepatitis. Hematoxylin and eosin stain; scale bars: A, 100 mm; B through F, 250 µm.

Discussion

MNV is a highly prevalent virus in research mice and can cause persistent infections.4,14,19,43 The virus has a tropism to infect many cell types, including dendritic cells, macrophages, and B cells; more recently it was discovered that MNV can infect T cells and a rare type of intestinal epithelial cells, tuft cells.12,22,27,48,50 Taken together, these characteristics of MNV support the possibility that infection might alter immune signaling, inflammatory responses, and disease outcomes in laboratory mice. The results from our laboratory and others have been variable, with some mouse models showing differences due to MNV infection,5,6,15,16,18,23,29,35,40,41,46 whereas other mouse models show minimal to no effects after infection.2,9,13,14,18,28

Previous work by our laboratory investigated the effects of MNV infection on various mouse models of inflammatory diseases, such as IBD.17,28,29 IBD is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract and includes both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Although the precise pathogenic mechanisms of IBD are unknown, many experimental mouse models of IBD are available to help dissect the complex interactions between host genetics, immune cell function, and the gut microbiota under both regulatory and inflammatory conditions.10,24,36,49 Studies of MNV infection in various mouse models of IBD have revealed that infection can exacerbate IBD progression in Mdr1a−/− mice infected with H. bilis but does not induce changes in IBD scores or incidence of colon cancer in Smad3−/− mice when compared with uninfected mice.28,29 In Il10−/− mice, the genetic background strain of the mouse contributed to whether MNV caused changes in disease progression. Il10−/− mice on a C3H/HeJBir background but not a C57BL/6J background showed changes in colonic inflammation after infection.5,17 In Atg16L1 mutant mice, infection with MNV was necessary—along with a Crohn's disease susceptibility gene (Atg16L1), commensal bacteria, and dextran sodium sulfate treatment—to cause intestinal disease resembling various aspects of disease in patients with Crohn's disease.6,51 Therefore, to expand on these previous findings regarding MNV infection and mouse models of IBD, we here determined the effect of MNV infection on the CD4+CD45RBhigh T-cell AT model of IBD.

The CD4+CD45RBhigh T-cell AT model of IBD is a widely used model of colitis that highlights the importance of the balance between effector cells that cause inflammation and regulatory cells that control inflammation. In this model, naïve CD4+CD45RBhigh T cells are injected into syngeneic, lymphopenic mice and cause colitis when they robustly proliferate in response to gut microbes in the absence of regulatory T cells that suppress inflammation and that are normally present in mature T-cell populations (CD4+CD45RBlow).24,26,42 Therefore, coadministration of naïve (CD4+CD45RBhigh) and mature (CD4+CD45RBlow) T cells together—or administration of the mature T-cell population alone—to recipient lymphopenic mice does not result in colitis.3,34,42 Given that this model is driven by the administration of naïve CD4+CD45RBhigh T cells, that CD4+ T cells recognize antigens in the context of MHC class II molecules present on professional antigen-presenting cells including macrophages, dendritic cells, and B cells, and that MNV has a tropism to infect macrophages, dendritic cells, B cells, and T cells,12,22,50 we hypothesized that MNV infection would alter the CD4+CD45RBhigh T-cell AT model of IBD. MNV infection did not significantly change weight loss (with some exceptions at a few time points), survival, or IBD scores compared with uninfected mice both with the bacterial accelerator of inflammation, H. bilis, or without it. We also evaluated the proliferation of CD4+ T cells after AT in the context of MNV infection. Reportedly, cell expansion occurs in lymphopenic mice after AT with CD4+ or CD4+CD45RBhigh T cells.11,25,32,34,39,42 Cell proliferation can be characterized as spontaneous proliferation, which occurs rapidly in severely lymphopenic hosts (for example, Rag1−/− mice), or homeostatic proliferation, which occurs more slowly and is more dominant in mildly lymphopenic hosts (for example, after irradiation).11,25,31,32 As expected, the majority of the administered CD4+ T cells were undergoing spontaneous proliferation, but cell proliferation did not differ between MNV-infected mice and uninfected controls. This lack of a MNV-associated effect on CD4+ T-cell proliferation is in alignment with our histologic data, which showed no differences in IBD score between MNV-infected and uninfected mice.

Similar to our study, other work using the CD4+CD45RBhigh T-cell AT model has likewise occasionally revealed inflammation in extracolonic organs.8,26,37,39,42 In our AT studies without the bacterial accelerator H. bilis, we observed that some animals began to develop clinical signs of disease, including alopecia, dermatitis, blepharitis, and respiratory abnormalities, beginning approximately 1 to 2 mo after AT. Significant differences in body weight between MNV-infected and uninfected control groups occurred at a few late time points and could not be explained by differences in colonic inflammation, given the lack of significant difference in IBD scores between groups at endpoint. Therefore, we speculate that the inflammation in these other extracolonic organs may have perhaps contributed to the differences in body weight observed at a few time points between groups in our studies. Histologically, we observed inflammation in several extracolonic organs, including the lung, esophagus, stomach, and liver. Adoptively transferred T cells were harvested from donor mice that were syngeneic to recipient mice, reducing the likelihood that the inflammation was caused by graft-versus-host disease. We speculate that we did not see the same extracolonic disease in adoptively transferred mice that received H. bilis due to the shorter study duration caused by the induced acceleration of inflammation in the colon. Interestingly, although the exact mechanism of the extracolonic inflammation in this animal model is unknown, people with IBD similarly occasionally exhibit extraintestinal manifestations affecting joints, skin, the hepatobiliary tract, lung, and eye.47 The exact pathogenesis of the extracolonic inflammation in people is unknown, but one suggested possibility is a leaky intestinal barrier that allows the translocation of gut bacteria, thus triggering an immune response in other organs due to cross reactive epitopes between bacteria and self-antigens.47 In contrast, others have reported that, although intestinal bacteria are indeed required for the development of colitis after AT of CD4+CD45RBhigh T cells, the development of interstitial pneumonia is independent of intestinal bacteria given that lung inflammation occurred even in germ free conditions.37 Therefore, although AT of CD4+CD45RBhigh T cells to lymphopenic mice is a useful model for studying T-cell–mediated immune reactions in IBD, these results are a reminder that inflammation in other organs can occur and might serve as a model for extraintestinal inflammation in patients with IBD.37

In conclusion, we evaluated the effect of MNV infection on the CD4+CD45RBhigh T-cell AT model of colitis both with and without a bacterial accelerator of disease, H. bilis. We demonstrated that MNV infection does not significantly alter IBD scores in this model, despite its reported ability to alter other models of IBD.5,6,29 Considering that MNV is highly prevalent and even endemic in many research mice colonies, our findings add to knowledge regarding MNV infection and its potential effects on mouse models of inflammation.

Acknowledgments

We thank Gary Knowels for his technical assistance. This work was supported by NIH R01-OD011149. SMM was supported by NIH grants 5T32DK007742-1 and K01-OD021420.

References

  • 1.Abraham C, Cho JH. 2009. Inflammatory bowel disease. N Engl J Med 361:2066–2078. 10.1056/NEJMra0804647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ammann CG, Messer RJ, Varvel K, Debuysscher BL, Lacasse RA, Pinto AK, Hasenkrug KJ. 2009. Effects of acute and chronic murine norovirus infections on immune responses and recovery from Friend retrovirus infection. J Virol 83:13037–13041. 10.1128/JVI.01445-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Aranda R, Sydora BC, McAllister PL, Binder SW, Yang HY, Targan SR, Kronenberg M. 1997. Analysis of intestinal lymphocytes in mouse colitis mediated by transfer of CD4+, CD45RBhigh T cells to SCID recipients. J Immunol 158:3464–3473. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Baldridge MT, Turula H, Wobus CE. 2016. Norovirus regulation by host and microbe. Trends Mol Med 22:1047–1059. 10.1016/j.molmed.2016.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Basic M, Keubler LM, Buettner M, Achard M, Breves G, Schroder B, Smoczek A, Jorns A, Wedekind D, Zschemisch NH, Gunther C, Neumann D, Lienenklaus S, Weiss S, Hornef MW, Mahler M, Bleich A. 2014. Norovirus triggered microbiota-driven mucosal inflammation in interleukin 10-deficient mice. Inflamm Bowel Dis 20:431–443. 10.1097/01.MIB.0000441346.86827.ed. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cadwell K, Patel KK, Maloney NS, Liu TC, Ng AC, Storer CE, Head RD, Xavier R, Stappenbeck TS, Virgin HW. 2010. Virus-plus-susceptibility gene interaction determines Crohn's disease gene Atg16L1 phenotypes in intestine. Cell 141:1135–1145. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cahill RJ, Foltz CJ, Fox JG, Dangler CA, Powrie F, Schauer DB. 1997. Inflammatory bowel disease: an immunity-mediated condition triggered by bacterial infection with Helicobacter hepaticus. Infect Immun 65:3126–3131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.De Winter H, Cheroutre H, Kronenberg M. 1999. Mucosal immunity and inflammation. II. The yin and yang of T cells in intestinal inflammation: pathogenic and protective roles in a mouse colitis model. Am J Physiol 276:G1317–G1321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Doom CM, Turula HM, Hill AB. 2009. Investigation of the impact of the common animal facility contaminant murine norovirus on experimental murine cytomegalovirus infection. Virology 392:153–161. 10.1016/j.virol.2009.05.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Elson CO, Cong Y, McCracken VJ, Dimmitt RA, Lorenz RG, Weaver CT. 2005. Experimental models of inflammatory bowel disease reveal innate, adaptive, and regulatory mechanisms of host dialogue with the microbiota. Immunol Rev 206:260–276. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00291.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Feng T, Wang L, Schoeb TR, Elson CO, Cong Y. 2010. Microbiota innate stimulation is a prerequisite for T-cell spontaneous proliferation and induction of experimental colitis. J Exp Med 207:1321–1332. 10.1084/jem.20092253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grau KR, Roth AN, Zhu S, Hernandez A, Colliou N, DiVita BB, Philip DT, Riffe C, Giasson B, Wallet SM, Mohamadzadeh M, Karst SM. 2017. The major targets of acute norovirus infection are immune cells in the gut-associated lymphoid tissue. Nat Microbiol 2:1586–1591. 10.1038/s41564-017-0057-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hensley SE, Pinto AK, Hickman HD, Kastenmayer RJ, Bennink JR, Virgin HW, Yewdell JW. 2009. Murine norovirus infection has no significant effect on adaptive immunity to vaccinia virus or influenza A virus. J Virol 83:7357–7360. 10.1128/JVI.00623-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Higgins PD, Johnson LA, Sauder K, Moons D, Blanco L, Taube S, Wobus CE. 2011. Transient or persistent norovirus infection does not alter the pathology of Salmonella typhimurium induced intestinal inflammation and fibrosis in mice. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 34:247–257. 10.1016/j.cimid.2010.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hsu CC, Meeker SM, Escobar S, Brabb TL, Paik J, Park H, Iritani BM, Maggio-Price L. 2018. Murine norovirus inhibits B cell development in the bone marrow of STAT1-deficient mice. Virology 515:123–133. 10.1016/j.virol.2017.12.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hsu CC, Paik J, Brabb TL, O'Brien KD, Kim J, Sullivan BG, Hudkins KL, Seamons A, Finley JC, Meeker SM, Maggio-Price L. 2015. Murine norovirus infection variably alters atherosclerosis in mice lacking Apolipoprotein E. Comp Med 65:369–381. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hsu CC, Paik J, Treuting PM, Seamons A, Meeker SM, Brabb TL, Maggio-Price L. 2014. Infection with murine norovirus 4 does not alter helicobacter-induced inflammatory bowel disease in IL10−/− mice. Comp Med 64:256–263. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hsu CC, Piotrowski SL, Meeker SM, Smith KD, Maggio-Price L, Treuting PM. 2016. Histologic Lesions induced by murine norovirus infection in laboratory mice. Vet Pathol 53:754–763. 10.1177/0300985815618439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hsu CC, Riley LK, Wills HM, Livingston RS. 2006. Persistent infection and serologic cross-reactivity of three novel murine noroviruses. Comp Med 56:247–251. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hsu CC, Wobus CE, Steffen EK, Riley LK, Livingston RS. 2005. Development of a microsphere-based serologic multiplexed fluorescent immunoassay and a reverse transcriptase PCR assay to detect murine norovirus 1 infection in mice. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 12:1145–1151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jiang HQ, Kushnir N, Thurnheer MC, Bos NA, Cebra JJ. 2002. Monoassociation of SCID mice with Helicobacter muridarum, but not four other enterics, provokes IBD upon receipt of T cells. Gastroenterology 122:1346–1354. 10.1053/gast.2002.32959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jones MK, Watanabe M, Zhu S, Graves CL, Keyes LR, Grau KR, Gonzalez-Hernandez MB, Iovine NM, Wobus CE, Vinje J, Tibbetts SA, Wallet SM, Karst SM. 2014. Enteric bacteria promote human and mouse norovirus infection of B cells. Science 346:755–759. 10.1126/science.1257147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kahan SM, Liu G, Reinhard MK, Hsu CC, Livingston RS, Karst SM. 2011. Comparative murine norovirus studies reveal a lack of correlation between intestinal virus titers and enteric pathology. Virology 421:202–210. 10.1016/j.virol.2011.09.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kiesler P, Fuss IJ, Strober W. 2015. Experimental models of inflammatory bowel diseases. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 1:154–170. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2015.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Le Campion A, Gagnerault MC, Auffray C, Becourt C, Poitrasson-Riviere M, Lallemand E, Bienvenu B, Martin B, Lepault F, Lucas B. 2009. Lymphopenia-induced spontaneous T-cell proliferation as a cofactor for autoimmune disease development. Blood 114:1784–1793. 10.1182/blood-2008-12-192120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Leach MW, Bean AG, Mauze S, Coffman RL, Powrie F. 1996. Inflammatory bowel disease in C.B-17 scid mice reconstituted with the CD45RBhigh subset of CD4+ T cells. Am J Pathol 148:1503–1515. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lee S, Wilen CB, Orvedahl A, McCune BT, Kim KW, Orchard RC, Peterson ST, Nice TJ, Baldridge MT, Virgin HW. 2017. Norovirus cell tropism is determined by combinatorial action of a viral non-structural protein and host cytokine. Cell Host Microbe 22:449–459 e4. 10.1016/j.chom.2017.08.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lencioni KC, Drivdahl R, Seamons A, Treuting PM, Brabb T, Maggio-Price L. 2011. Lack of effect of murine norovirus infection on a mouse model of bacteria-induced colon cancer. Comp Med 61:219–226. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lencioni KC, Seamons A, Treuting PM, Maggio-Price L, Brabb T. 2008. Murine norovirus: an intercurrent variable in a mouse model of bacteria-induced inflammatory bowel disease. Comp Med 58:522–533. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Maggio-Price L, Seamons A, Bielefeldt-Ohmann H, Zeng W, Brabb T, Ware C, Lei M, Hershberg RM. 2013. Lineage targeted MHC-II transgenic mice demonstrate the role of dendritic cells in bacterial-driven colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 19:174–184. 10.1002/ibd.23000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Min B. 2018. Spontaneous T cell proliferation: a physiologic process to create and maintain homeostatic balance and diversity of the immune system. Front Immunol 9:1–8. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Min B, Yamane H, Hu-Li J, Paul WE. 2005. Spontaneous and homeostatic proliferation of CD4 T cells are regulated by different mechanisms. J Immunol 174:6039–6044. 10.4049/jimmunol.174.10.6039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Morrissey PJ, Charrier K. 1994. Induction of wasting disease in SCID mice by the transfer of normal CD4+/CD45RBhi T cells and the regulation of this autoreactivity by CD4+/CD45RBlo T cells. Res Immunol 145:357–362. 10.1016/S0923-2494(94)80200-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Morrissey PJ, Charrier K, Braddy S, Liggitt D, Watson JD. 1993. CD4+ T cells that express high levels of CD45RB induce wasting disease when transferred into congenic severe combined immunodeficient mice. Disease development is prevented by cotransfer of purified CD4+ T cells. J Exp Med 178:237–244. 10.1084/jem.178.1.237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mumphrey SM, Changotra H, Moore TN, Heimann-Nichols ER, Wobus CE, Reilly MJ, Moghadamfalahi M, Shukla D, Karst SM. 2007. Murine norovirus 1 infection is associated with histopathological changes in immunocompetent hosts, but clinical disease is prevented by STAT1-dependent interferon responses. J Virol 81:3251–3263. 10.1128/JVI.02096-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nell S, Suerbaum S, Josenhans C. 2010. The impact of the microbiota on the pathogenesis of IBD: lessons from mouse infection models. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:564–577. 10.1038/nrmicro2403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nemoto Y, Kanai T, Takahara M, Oshima S, Okamoto R, Tsuchiya K, Matsumoto S, Watanabe M. 2013. Th1/Th17-mediated interstitial pneumonia in chronic colitis mice independent of intestinal microbiota. J Immunol 190:6616–6625. 10.4049/jimmunol.1202930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ng SC, Shi HY, Hamidi N, Underwood FE, Tang W, Benchimol EI, Panaccione R, Ghosh S, Wu JCY, Chan FKL, Sung JJY, Kaplan GG. 2018. Worldwide incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in the 21st century: a systematic review of population-based studies. Lancet 390:2769–2778. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32448-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ostanin DV, Bao J, Koboziev I, Gray L, Robinson-Jackson SA, Kosloski-Davidson M, Price VH, Grisham MB. 2009. T-cell transfer model of chronic colitis: concepts, considerations, and tricks of the trade. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 296:G135–G146. 10.1152/ajpgi.90462.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Paik J, Fierce Y, Mai PO, Phelps SR, McDonald T, Treuting P, Drivdahl R, Brabb T, LeBoeuf R, O'Brien KD, Maggio-Price L. 2011. Murine norovirus increases atherosclerotic lesion size and macrophages in Ldlr−/− mice. Comp Med 61:330–338. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Paik J, Kwok F, Seamons A, Brabb T, Kim J, Sullivan B, Hsu C, O'Brien KD, Maggio-Price L. 2015. Effects of murine norovirus on atherosclerosis in Ldlr−/− mice depends on the timing of infection. Comp Med 65:114–122. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Powrie F, Leach MW, Mauze S, Caddle LB, Coffman RL. 1993. Phenotypically distinct subsets of CD4+ T cells induce or protect from chronic intestinal inflammation in C. B–17 scid mice. Int Immunol 5:1461–1471. 10.1093/intimm/5.11.1461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pritchett-Corning KR, Cosentino J, Clifford CB. 2009. Contemporary prevalence of infectious agents in laboratory mice and rats. Lab Anim 43:165–173. 10.1258/la.2008.008009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Song-Zhao GX, Maloy KJ. 2014. Experimental mouse models of T cell-dependent inflammatory bowel disease. Methods Mol Biol 1193:199–211. 10.1007/978-1-4939-1212-4_18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Stepankova R, Powrie F, Kofronova O, Kozakova H, Hudcovic T, Hrncir T, Uhlig H, Read S, Rehakova Z, Benada O, Heczko P, Strus M, Bland P, Tlaskalova-Hogenova H. 2007. Segmented filamentous bacteria in a defined bacterial cocktail induce intestinal inflammation in SCID mice reconstituted with CD45RBhigh CD4+ T cells. Inflamm Bowel Dis 13:1202–1211. 10.1002/ibd.20221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Thépaut M, Grandjean T, Hober D, Lobert PE, Bortolotti P, Faure K, Dessein R, Kipnis E, Guery B. 2015. Protective role of murine norovirus against Pseudomonas aeruginosa acute pneumonia. Vet Res 46:1–7. 10.1186/s13567-015-0239-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Vavricka SR, Schoepfer A, Scharl M, Lakatos PL, Navarini A, Rogler G. 2015. Extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 21:1982–1992. 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wilen CB, Lee S, Hsieh LL, Orchard RC, Desai C, Hykes BL, Jr, McAllaster MR, Balce DR, Feehley T, Brestoff JR, Hickey CA, Yokoyama CC, Wang YT, MacDuff DA, Kreamalmayer D, Howitt MR, Neil JA, Cadwell K, Allen PM, Handley SA, van Lookeren Campagne M, Baldridge MT, Virgin HW. 2018. Tropism for tuft cells determines immune promotion of norovirus pathogenesis. Science 360:204–208. 10.1126/science.aar3799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wirtz S, Neurath MF. 2007. Mouse models of inflammatory bowel disease. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59:1073–1083. 10.1016/j.addr.2007.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wobus CE, Karst SM, Thackray LB, Chang KO, Sosnovtsev SV, Belliot G, Krug A, Mackenzie JM, Green KY, Virgin HW. 2004. Replication of Norovirus in cell culture reveals a tropism for dendritic cells and macrophages. PLoS Biol 2:2076–2084. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wong SY, Cadwell K. 2018. There was collusion: Microbes in inflammatory bowel disease. PLoS Pathog 14:1–7. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Comparative Medicine are provided here courtesy of American Association for Laboratory Animal Science

RESOURCES