Skip to main content
International Brazilian Journal of Urology : Official Journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology logoLink to International Brazilian Journal of Urology : Official Journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
. 2020 Jan 10;46(2):224–233. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0198

Bladder cancer trends and mortality in the brazilian public health system

Frederico Timoteo 1, Fernando Korkes 1,2, Willy Baccaglini 1, Sidney Glina 1
PMCID: PMC7025845  PMID: 32022511

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Considering the lack of data on BC trends in Brazilian population, mainly as a result of the difficulty on gathering data, the present manuscript provides an overview of bladder cancer incidence, hospitalization, mortality patterns and trends using the Brazilian Data Center for The Public Health System (DATASUS).

Materials and Methods

All hospital admissions associated with BC diagnosis (ICD-10 C67) between 2008 and 2017 were analyzed. Distributions according to year, gender, age group, ethnicity, death, length of hospital stay, and costs were evaluated. Demographic data was obtained from the last Brazilian national census.

Results

From 2008 to 2017 there were 119,058 public hospital admissions related to BC. Patients were mostly white males aged 60 to 79 years-old. Mortality rates for patients who have undergone surgery was 6.75% on average, being 7.38% for women and 6.49% for men. Mortality rates were higher when open surgeries were performed compared to endoscopic procedures (4.98% vs 1.18%). Considering only endoscopic procedures, mortality rates were three times higher after urgent surgeries compared to elective ones (2.6% vs 0.6%). Over the years the cystectomy/transurethral bladder resection (C/T) ratio significantly decreased in all Brazilian Regions. In 2008, the C/T ratio was 0.19, while in 2017 it reduced to 0.08.

Conclusions

Despite BC relatively low incidence, it still represents a significant social economic burden in Brazil, as it presents with recurrent episodes that might require multiple hospitalizations and surgical treatment. The set of data collected might suggest that population access to health care has improved between 2008-2017.

Keywords: Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Mortality, Public Health

INTRODUCTION

According to American Cancer Society, in the United States in 2018, approximately 81, 190 patients were diagnosed and about 17.240 deaths occurred due to bladder neoplasm (1). Data retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program from National Cancer Institute (SEER), recollects that rates for new bladder cancer (BC) cases have been falling on average 1.0% each year over the last 10 years. Nevertheless, BC remains as the 6th more common type of cancer in the United States, accounting for 4.7% of all new cancer cases (2).

Worldwide, about 549.393 new diagnosis were made and 199.922 deaths were attributed to BC in 2018, which corresponds, respectively, to 3% of all cancer diagnosis and 2.1% of cancer-related deaths (3). In Brazil, where BC figures as the seventh most common malignancy in men and the 14th in women, it is estimated a yearly diagnosis of 6.43 new cases per 100.000 men and 2.63 per 100.000 women (4). Whilst more frequent in men, BC tend to be found more clinically significant and in more advanced stages in women (5). As BC manifests primarily with gross or microscopic hematuria and has a recurrent pattern, patients who have been diagnosed with the disease frequently require multiple procedures and hospitalizations, both elective or urgent, in order to achieve either cure or at least control the disease. Despite having a relatively low incidence, clinical characteristics of this neoplasms results in a relevant social and economic burden to Brazilian government. In 2014 alone, 27.738 life years were lost due to BC deaths, US$ 29.879.165 were directly spent with BC treatment and an indirect loss of US$76.996.523 was estimated (6).

It is well known that the incidence of BC varies geographically with higher incidence rates in Western Europe and North America and lowest rates in Eastern Europe and Asia (7). There is data recollecting that the disease incidence may vary significantly even within a country, in the United States there are lower incidence rates in Utah and Hawaii compared to the Northeastern states (8). Studies assessing mortality and incidence of BC found that more than 60% of cases and over half of the deaths occur in less developed countries (3).

Bladder cancer occurrence is strongly related to environmental factors and aging. Smokers are 2-4 times more likely to develop BC and this association seems to be related to smoking intensity (9, 10).

Workplace exposure to carcinogens may account to approximately 10-20% of BC cases (11).

Metal workers, painters, rubber industry and textile workers and cement or mine workers are professionals with higher risk for BC due to exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (12, 13).

Considering social and demographic characteristics along with BC treatment impact on Brazilian Public Health System, it is imperative that caregivers be aware of BC epidemiology in the Brazilian population. The present manuscript provides an overview of BC incidence, hospitalization, mortality patterns and trends using the Brazilian Data Center for The Public Health System (DATASUS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Brazilian Public Health System Information Database was used as the primary data source for our study. DATASUS represents the primary effort of Brazilian Federal Government to collect data from the national health system. This database includes information from all public health hospitals throughout the country, guaranteeing health support to about 170 million Brazilians.

All hospital admissions associated with BC diagnosis (ICD-10 C67) between 2008 and 2017 were analyzed. Distributions according to year, gender, age group, ethnicity, death, length of hospital stay and costs were evaluated.

Additionally, another search was performed according to surgical procedure. All procedures directly associated with BC surgery were evaluated, and divided into endoscopic surgery (codes: 0409010383-BLADDER TUMOR ENDOSCOPIC RESSECTION, 0416010172-ONCOLOGIC BLADDER TUMOR ENDOSCOPIC RESSECTION) and open surgery (codes: 0409010022-PARTIAL CYSTECTOMY, 0409010030-RADICAL CYSTECTOMY, 0409010049-SINGLE STAGE RADICAL CYSTECTOMY AND URINARY DIVERSION, 0409010057-CYSTOENTEROPLASTY, 0416010024-ONCOLOGIC SINGLE STAGE RADICAL CYSTECTOMY AND URINARY DIVERSION, 0416010032-ONCOLOGIC RADICAL CYSTECTOMY AND SIMPLE URINARY DIVERSION). For this second search, data evaluated included year, geographic region of Brazil, death rate, length of hospital stay and characteristic of hospital admission (elective vs. urgent).

Demographic data from the Brazilian population during the studied period were obtained from the last national census, realized in 2010 and trends in the rate of BC diagnosis and treatment from 2008 to 2017 were described.

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 13.0 (SPSS for Mac OS X, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illinois). Groups were compared with Pearson’s chi-square test and ANOVA. Statistical significance was determined at p <0.05.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2017, the population that relies on Brazilian Public Health System has increased 6.3% reaching 162 million people in 2017 and there were 119.058 patients admitted to public hospitals in Brazil with diagnosis of BC along those years. The number of hospital admissions related to BC went from 7.277 in 2008 to 16.547 in 2017. Patients admitted with BC were mostly white males aged 60 to 79 years. Figures 1-4 demonstrates admission growth tendency during the time of the study (Figure-1) and the distributions of these patients according to gender (Figure-2), age group (Figure-3) and ethnicity (Figure-4). The death rate among patients admitted with BC remained quite stable, being 6.4% in 2008 and 6.6% in 2017. Table-1 summarizes BC admissions, deaths and mortality rate.

Figure 1. Bladder Cancer Admissions on Brazilian Public Health System (2008-2017).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Bladder Cancer admissions according to gender (2008-2017).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Bladder Cancer admissions according age group (2008-2017).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Bladder Cancer admissions according to ethnicity (2008-2017).

Figure 4

Table 1. BC Admissions, Deaths and Mortality Rates from 2008-2017.

Year Population using Public Health System BC cases (n=119.058) BC rate BC deaths Mortality rate
      (x10-5)   (%)
     
 
2017 162.077,403 16,547 10.21 1,100 6.6%
2016 160.022,071 15,069 9.42 1,032 6.8%
2015 156.750,009 14,387 9.18 1,005 7.0%
2014 154.265,099 13,445 8.72 879 6.5%
2013 153.223,204 12,521 8.17 873 7.0%
2012 152.901,741 11,340 7.42 762 6.7%
2011 152.746,237 10,133 6.63 651 6.4%
2010 151.858,919 9,781 6.44 666 6.8%
2009 153.659,783 8,558 5.57 615 7.2%
2008 152.427,207 7,277 4.77 466 6.4%

Across the studied years, among individuals who have undergone surgery, there was a 6.75% mortality rate, being 7.4% for women and 6.5% for men. Highest mortality rate occurred in 2008, when it reached 7.2% for all individuals and 7.7% for women along with 7.0% for men. BC mortality during hospitalization was higher among patients who were over 80 years-old (Figure-5).

Figure 5. Bladder Cancer Mortality during hospitalization according to age group.

Figure 5

During procedure analysis, it was found 77.353 endoscopic procedures to treat BC with 915 deaths and 8.925 open procedures with 441 deaths performed during the decade evaluated, which translates to a mortality rate of 1.2% and 5.0%, respectively, between 2008-2017 (Table-2). There were 54.759 elective transurethral bladder resections (TURb) during the studied period, with 326 documented deaths, while there were 589 deaths among the 22.595 urgent TURb, corresponding respectively, to a mortality rate of 0.6% and 2.6% (Table-3). Mortality rates for urgent radical cystectomies were about 50% higher than the rate for elective radical cystectomies (9.74 vs. 6.02).

Table 2. Endoscopic vs Open Procedures and related Death rates.

  TURB Radical Cystectomies

Year Cases Deaths Rate Cases Deaths Rate
2008 5,495 72 1.31% 1,053 38 3.61%
2009 5,814 67 1.15% 1,099 52 4.73%
2010 6,313 62 0.98% 982 41 4.18%
2011 6,632 62 0.93% 875 42 4.80%
2012 7,053 96 1.36% 795 43 5.41%
2013 8,205 109 1.33% 883 47 5.32%
2014 8,836 117 1.32% 858 54 6.29%
2015 9,028 120 1.33% 800 37 4.63%
2016 9,496 99 1.04% 730 33 4.52%
2017 10,481 111 1.06% 850 54 6.35%

Total 77,353 915 1.18% 8,925 441 4.98%

Table 3. Deaths after TURb, elective vs. urgent.

Deaths after TURb (elective vs urgent)

  Elective Urgent
 
  Surgeries Deaths Rate (%) Surgeries Deaths Rate (%)
2008 3,627 29 0.8 1,868 43 2.3
2009 3,950 27 0.684 1,864 40 2.15
2010 4,416 22 0.498 1,897 40 2.1
2011 4,720 19 0.403 1,912 43 2.24
2012 5,026 29 0.577 2,027 67 3.3
2013 5,954 47 0.789 2,251 62 2.8
2014 6,309 43 0.682 2,527 74 2.9
2015 6,382 37 0.58 2,646 83 3.1
2016 6,850 32 0.467 2,646 67 2.5
2017 7,525 41 0.545 2,956 70 2.36

Total 54,759 326 0.595 22,594 589 2.6

The open procedures were mostly radical cystectomies, being 1.966 (22.0%) partial cystectomies. About 4.209 (47.2%) of the open procedures were performed in Brazilian Southeast Region, followed by South, Northeast, Midwest and North regions with 1.935 (21.7%), 1.403 (15.7%), 742 (8.3%) and 636 (7.1%) of these surgeries, respectively.

Mean length of hospital stay after was 6.9 days for partial cystectomies and 13.6 days for radical cystectomies. Patients who have undergone surgeries in North Region presented the lowest mean hospital stay of 10.3 days followed by patients from South (11.11), Northeast (12.07), Midwest (12.82) and Southeast (13.27) regions, respectively. For TURb, mean length of hospital stay was of 4.3 days.

During the decade evaluated, the correlation between radical cystectomy and TURb (C/T ratio) presented a significant reduction. In 2008, the C/T ratio was 0.19, while in 2012 it reduced to 0.11 and then to 0.08 in 2017 (Figure-6).

Figure 6. Cystectomy over TURb Rate from 2008 – 2017.

Figure 6

DISCUSSION

Recent studies have reported that worldwide BC incidence trends towards stabilization or decline in men versus increase in women with an overall decrease in mortality. In Brazil there is paucity of data, but Antonini et al. demonstrated similar trends regarding incidence whilst there was a slightly increase in mortality (14). Our study has some important findings.

First, during the studied decade the number of hospital admissions related to BC has significantly increased. There were 7.277 admissions in 2008 and in 2017 16.547 were recorded. Even though this finding could be attributed to an increase in BC incidence, it is our belief that better access to health systems and better notification also explains this increment. There are some findings that reinforce the latter hypothesis. Although there was a large number of admissions, death rates among patients admitted with BC related diagnosis remained stable: 6.4% in 2008 vs. 6.6% in 2017. Additionally, the number of BC admissions more than doubled while the number of individuals that rely on Brazilian Public Health System has increased only 6.3%.

Second, it is important to highlight our findings regarding the C/T ratio for BC treatment. Across the years the C/T ratio has decreased from 0.19 in 2008 to 0.08 in 2017. It is our understanding that in an ideal scenario the vast majority of bladder tumors would be treated in early stages by endoscopic procedures. Thus, the C/T ratio decrease might point that early diagnosis might have been performed and more superficial BC cases were treated vis a vis invasive disease. Access to Public Health System might have improved since not only the number of individuals admitted to manage BC has significantly increased but also the proportion of cystectomies has decreased, which, as mentioned before, may reflect an improvement of BC treatment in early stages with TURb. The C/T ratio might also reflect regional disparities in Brazil. Over 68% of the cystectomies were performed in Southeast and South regions; those Brazilian regions present the highest Human Develop Index (HDI) (15). In these southern regions, C/T ratio was lower than that presented in underdeveloped northern regions of the country (Figure-7). This finding might be related to better access to health care along with more equipped hospitals in these regions leading to higher diagnosis rates and adequate treatment. We acknowledge, however, that definite conclusions should not be made regarding the C/T ration as this is not a validated index and further studies encompassing different populations and in a more controlled scenario are needed to evaluate the usability of the C/T ratio as a quality of care index. Figure-7 demonstrates the C/T ratio in the five geographic regions of Brazil during the last years.

Figure 7. Cystectomy over TURb Rate from 2008 – 2017 according to geographic regions in Brazil.

Figure 7

Third, there were some factors associated with increased mortality following BC treatment. Mortality significantly increased with age (Figure-5), which, according to literature, may reflect late BC stages at diagnosis and poorer biologic response for both the disease and the morbidity of its treatment (16). This increment in mortality in the elderly population might become progressively more relevant, since we have also observed that population aging process can be translated into a progressively higher number of octogenarians being diagnosed and treated for BC. A large SEER database analysis of over 10.000 patients treated in the US with RC between 1984 and 2004 showed that at 90 days mortality is 1% for patients younger than 60 years of age, 6% between ages 69 and 83 and 14% for patients over age 89 (17).

Cumberbatch et al., at a recent systematic review, reported that mortality varies worldwide but trends to be higher in men than in women (18). According to SEER database, despite 30-day mortality after radical cystectomy was higher for men, 90-day mortality became higher for women (4.8% Vs. 3.2%) (17). In accordance, our data, shows higher BC mortality among women vs. men (7.38% Vs. 6.49%).

In addition, surgeries performed as an urgent basis burdened a significant higher mortality rate than elective procedures (2.1% vs. 0.4%, p <0.0001). Likewise, higher mortality relative rates occurred following radical cystectomies performed urgently vs. elective (9.74 vs. 6.02, p <0.0001). The reported rate of perioperative mortality after radical cystectomy ranges from 0.8% to 5.6% in foreign contemporary cystectomy series (17). Mortality rates in the current Brazilian series was somewhat higher than that. Several variables may affect this rate, including patient age, nutrition status, tumor characteristics/advanced stages at diagnosis and the lack of large volume centers. This elevated mortality rates after BC treatment in Brazil is still to be studied in detail as several factors might have influence on this finding: from the data acquisition method to problems related to health care access, especially for the poorer living in remote areas of Brazil.

Fourth, partial cystectomies rate was high, representing 22% of all open procedures. It has been previously demonstrated in the SEER database that while high volume centers perform partial cystectomies in 12% of patients, low volume centers tend to perform partial cystectomies in as much as 34% of all open procedures. These high rates might suggest that many patients are being inadequately treated for their diseases (19).

Our study has some limitations. As an epidemiologic study, definitive conclusions cannot be made based exclusively on our findings. Like other neoplasms, BC might still be underreported as cause of hospitalization and death, especially in developing countries as Brazil. Additionally, admissions are not considered in an individual basis, and patients can be considered twice in data analysis. The C/T ratio is also not a validated tool and might be biased by several distinctive factors. However, mainly as a result of the difficulty to gather these data, there is a paucity of data of epidemiologic studies in BC in Brazil. Therefore, our study outlines BC trends in Brazilian population in the last decade and might bring insights to help establish public health policies.

CONCLUSIONS

In Brazil, BC incidence seems to corroborate the current literature when it comes to gender and ethnicity. Furthermore, despite BC relatively low incidence, it still represents a significant social economic burden in Brazil, as it presents with recurrent episodes that might require multiple hospitalizations and surgical treatment. Present data might suggest that population access to health care and notification have improved between 2008-2017, with significant growth in the number of hospital admissions related to BC. Considering the impact of BC in Brazilian Public Health system, our data reinforces the importance of further studies and policies on BC risk factors and treatment.

REFERENCES

  • 1.1. Cancer Facts & Figures 2018, American Cancer of Society 2018. Avalable at. <https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-facts-figures/cancer-facts-figures-2018.html>. Access on January 2019.; Cancer Facts & Figures American Cancer of Society 2018. 2018. [Access on January 2019]. https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-facts-figures/cancer-facts-figures-2018.html>.
  • 2.2. SEER Cancer Stat Facts: Bladder Cancer. National Cancer Institute. Avalable at.<https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/urinb.html>; SEER Cancer Stat Facts: Bladder Cancer National Cancer Institute. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/urinb.html.
  • 3.3. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394-424. [DOI] [PubMed]; Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.4. MINISTÉRIO DA SAÚDE- MS. Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Brasil, 2018. Estimativa da Incidência e Mortalidade por Câncer no Brasil - 2018. Avalable at. <http://www1.inca.gov.br/estimativa/2018/casos-taxas-brasil.asp>. Access on March 16, 2019.; MINISTÉRIO DA SAÚDE- MS Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Brasil, 2018. Estimativa da Incidência e Mortalidade por Câncer no Brasil. 2018. [Access on March 16, 2019]. http://www1.inca.gov.br/estimativa/2018/casos-taxas-brasil.asp>.
  • 5.5. Scosyrev E, Noyes K, Feng C, Messing E. Sex and racial differences in bladder cancer presentation and mortality in the US. Cancer. 2009;115:68-74. [DOI] [PubMed]; Scosyrev E, Noyes K, Feng C, Messing E. Sex and racial differences in bladder cancer presentation and mortality in the US. Cancer. 2009;115:68–74. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.6. MP Rosim, FM Sarti, B Riveros, GO Pedro, RC Lucchetta, LM Okumura, et al. Estimation of Total Burden of Bladder Cancer in Brazil - An Economic and Clinical Approach. 2018, 21, S26.; Rosim MP, Sarti FM, Riveros B, Pedro GO, Lucchetta RC, Okumura LM, et al. Estimation of Total Burden of Bladder Cancer in Brazil. S26An Economic and Clinical Approach. 2018;21 [Google Scholar]
  • 7.7. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:277-300. Erratum in: CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:133-4. [DOI] [PubMed]; Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:277–300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. Erratum in: CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:133-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.8. Pelucchi C, Bosetti C, Negri E, Malvezzi M, La Vecchia C. Mechanisms of disease: The epidemiology of bladder cancer. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2006;3:327-40. [DOI] [PubMed]; Pelucchi C, Bosetti C, Negri E, Malvezzi M, La Vecchia C. Mechanisms of disease: The epidemiology of bladder cancer. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2006;3:327–340. doi: 10.1038/ncpuro0510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.9. Nieder AM, John S, Messina CR, Granek IA, Adler HL. Are patients aware of the association between smoking and bladder cancer? J Urol. 2006;176(6 Pt 1):2405-8. [DOI] [PubMed]; Nieder AM, John S, Messina CR, Granek IA, Adler HL. Are patients aware of the association between smoking and bladder cancer? J Urol. 2006;176(6):2405–2408. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.147. Pt 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.10. Korkes F, Juliano CA, Bunduky MA, Costa AC, Castro MG. Amount of tobacco consumption is associated with superficial bladder cancer progression. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2010;8:473-6. [DOI] [PubMed]; Korkes F, Juliano CA, Bunduky MA, Costa AC, Castro MG. Einstein. Vol. 8. Sao Paulo: 2010. Amount of tobacco consumption is associated with superficial bladder cancer progression; pp. 473–476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.11. Jung I, Messing E. Molecular mechanisms and pathways in bladder cancer development and progression. Cancer Control. 2000;7:325-34. [DOI] [PubMed]; Jung I, Messing E. Molecular mechanisms and pathways in bladder cancer development and progression. Cancer Control. 2000;7:325–334. doi: 10.1177/107327480000700401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.12. Kogevinas M, ‘t Mannetje A, Cordier S, Ranft U, González CA, Vineis P, et al. Occupation and bladder cancer among men in Western Europe. Cancer Causes Control. 2003;14:907-14. [DOI] [PubMed]; Kogevinas M, ‘t Mannetje A, Cordier S, Ranft U, González CA, Vineis P, et al. Occupation and bladder cancer among men in Western Europe. Cancer Causes Control. 2003;14:907–914. doi: 10.1023/b:caco.0000007962.19066.9c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.13. Cha JD, Lourenço DB, Korkes F. Analysis of the association between bladder carcinoma and arsenic concentration in soil and water in southeast Brazil. Int Braz J Urol. 2018;44:906-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]; Cha JD, Lourenço DB, Korkes F. Analysis of the association between bladder carcinoma and arsenic concentration in soil and water in southeast Brazil. Int Braz J Urol. 2018;44:906–913. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.14. Antoni S, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Znaor A, Jemal A, Bray F. Bladder Cancer Incidence and Mortality: A Global Overview and Recent Trends. Eur Urol. 2017;71:96-108. [DOI] [PubMed]; Antoni S, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Znaor A, Jemal A, Bray F. Bladder Cancer Incidence and Mortality: A Global Overview and Recent Trends. Eur Urol. 2017;71:96–108. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.15. Atlas do Desenvolvimento Humano do Brasil – IPEA. Avalable at. <http://www.atlasbrasil.org.br/2013/>. Accessed on may 2018.; Atlas do Desenvolvimento Humano do Brasil – IPEA. [Accessed on may 2018]. http://www.atlasbrasil.org.br/2013/>.
  • 16.16. Nielsen ME, Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Lotan Y, Rogers CG, Amiel GE, et al. Advanced age is associated with poorer bladder cancer-specific survival in patients treated with radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51:699-706. [DOI] [PubMed]; Nielsen ME, Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Lotan Y, Rogers CG, Amiel GE, et al. Advanced age is associated with poorer bladder cancer-specific survival in patients treated with radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51:699–706. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.17. Isbarn H, Jeldres C, Zini L, Perrotte P, Baillargeon-Gagne S, Capitanio U, et al. A population based assessment of perioperative mortality after cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol. 2009;182:70-7. [DOI] [PubMed]; Isbarn H, Jeldres C, Zini L, Perrotte P, Baillargeon-Gagne S, Capitanio U, et al. A population based assessment of perioperative mortality after cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol. 2009;182:70–77. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.18. Cumberbatch MGK, Jubber I, Black PC, Esperto F, Figueroa JD, Kamat AM, et al. Epidemiology of Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Contemporary Update of Risk Factors in 2018. Eur Urol. 2018;74:784-795. [DOI] [PubMed]; Cumberbatch MGK, Jubber I, Black PC, Esperto F, Figueroa JD, Kamat AM, et al. Epidemiology of Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Contemporary Update of Risk Factors in 2018. Eur Urol. 2018;74:784–795. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.19. Hollenbeck BK, Wei Y, Birkmeyer JD. Volume, process of care, and operative mortality for cystectomy for bladder cancer. Urology. 2007;69:871-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]; Hollenbeck BK, Wei Y, Birkmeyer JD. Volume, process of care, and operative mortality for cystectomy for bladder cancer. Urology. 2007;69:871–875. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology are provided here courtesy of Brazilian Society of Urology

RESOURCES