Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology logoLink to Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology
. 2006 Oct 27;7(2):139–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2002.tb00155.x

Body Surface Potential Mapping: Historical Background, Present Possibilities, Diagnostic Challenges

Mihály Medvegy 1,✉, Gábor Duray 1, Arnold Pintér 1, István Préda 1
PMCID: PMC7027621  PMID: 12049686

The content is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

REFERENCES

  • 1. Waller AD. On the electromotive changes connected with the beat of the mammalian heart and of the human heart in particular. Philos Trans R Soc 1889;180:169. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Rautaharju PM. A hundred years of progress in electrocardiography 1. Early contributions from Walker to Wilson. Can J Cardiol 1987;3: 362–374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Préda I, Shakin VV, Bukosza I, et al. Quantitative comparison of the dipolar and multipolar content of isopotential surface maps. Adv Cardiol 1977;21:73–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Medvegy M, Antalóczy Z, Cserjés ZS. New possibility in the studying of the heart activation: The nondipolar body surface map. Can J Cardiol 1993;9:215–218. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Denniss AR, Cooper MJ, Ross DL, et al. Improved detection of delayed potentials by signal averaging of 28 body surface ECG leads. Circulation 1988;78:II–137. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Préda I, Kozmann GY, Kékes E, et al. 32‐Channel On‐line Exercise Mapping Chapter in Ruttkay‐Nedeczky I, Macfarlane P. (eds): Electrocardiology '83. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam , 1984;pp. 164–166. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Taccardi B. Body surface mapping and cardiac electric sources. A historical survey. J Electrocardiol 1990;23(Suppl):150–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Flowers NC, Horan LG. Body Surface Potential Mapping Chapter in Zipes DP, Jalife J. (eds): Cardiac Electrophysiology. From Cell to Bedside, Saunders Co., Philadelphia . 1995;pp: 1049–1067. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Green LS, Lux RL, Stilli D, et al. Fine detail in body surface potential maps: Accuracy of maps using a limited lead array and spatial and temporal data representation. J Electrocardiol 1987;20:21–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Sándor GY, Kozmann GY, Cserjés ZS, et al. Body surface potential field representation fidelity: Analysis of map estimation procedures. J Electrocardiol 1999;32:253–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Savard P, Ackaoui A, Gulrajani R, et al. Localization of cardiac ectopic activity in man by a single moving dipole: Comparison of different computation techniques. J Electrocardiol 1985;18:211–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Antaloczy Z, Greguss P, Bukosza I, et al. Spatial Display of Multipolar Electrical Heart Activity: The Holocardiography Chapter in Antalóczy Z, Prédal I. (eds): Electrocardiology '81. Amsterdam , Excerpta Medica; and Budapest , Akadémia , 1982, pp. 209–216. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Hatala R, Savard P, Tremblay G, et al. Three distinct patterns of ventricular activation in infarcted human hearts. An intraoperative cardiac mapping study during sinus rhythm. Circulation 1995;91: 1480–1494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Wyndham CR, Meeran MK, Smith T, et al. Epicardial activation of the intact human heart without conduction defect. Circulation 1979;59:161–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Watabe S, Taccardi B, Lux RL, et al. Effect of nontransmural necrosis on epicardial potential fields: Correlation with fiber direction. Circulation 1991;69:1427–1449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Préda I, Zámolyi K, Medvegy M, et al. Endocardial Pseudoisochron Maps in Normal Intraventricular Conduction, Experimental Ischemia and Right Ventricular Pacemaker Stimulation on the Dog Chapter in Antalóczy Z, Préda I, Kékes E. (eds): Advances in Electrocardiology. Elsevier, Amsterdam , 1990;pp:91–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Gábor D, Nelson CV. Determination of the resultant dipole of the heart from measurements on the body surface. J Appl Phy 1954;25:413–416. [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Geselowitz DB. Multipole representation for an equivalent cardiac generator. Proc IRE 1960;48:75–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Harumi K, Tsunakava H, Kanesaka S, et al. Moving Dipole Analysis in Normal and Myocardial Infarction Chapter in Van Dam R, Van Oosterom A. (eds): Electrocardiographic Body Surface Mapping. Martinus Nijhoff Publ. Dordrecht , Boston , Lancaster , 1986;pp:283–288. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Endroczy G, Antaloczy Z, Medvegy M. A practical new method for the complete determination of the equivalent dipole Chapter in Antalóczy Z, Préda I, Kékes E. (eds): Advances in Electrocardiology. Amsterdam , Elsevier, 1990, pp:23–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Medvegy M, Antaloczy Z, Endroczy G. The dipole aspect in the clinical practice Chapter in Antalóczy Z, Préda I, Kékes E. (eds): Advances in Electrocardiology. Amsterdam , Elsevier, 1990, pp. 27–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Selvester RH, Wagner GS, Ideker RE. Myocardial infarction Chapter in Macfarlane PW, Lawrie TDW. (eds): Comprehensive Electrocardiology. New York , Pergamon Press, 1989, pp. 565–629. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Durrer D, Dam RT, Freud GE, et al. Total excitation of the isolated human heart. Circulation 1970;41:899–912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Stovicek P, Stojan M, Kasalicky J, et al. Analysis of ventricular activation in patients with chronic non‐Q wave myocardial infarction: Comparison with left ventricular asynergy and myocardial perfusion defects. Physiol Res 1993;42:109–117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Pham‐Huy H, Gulrajani RM, Roberge FA, et al. A comparative evaluation of three different approaches for detecting body surface isopotential map abnormalities in patients with myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol 1981;14:43–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Taccardi B. Distribution of heart potentials on the thoracic surface of normal subjects. Circ Res 1963;12:341–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Montague TJ, Smith ER, Cameron DA, et al. Isointegral analysis of body surface maps: Surface distribution and temporal variability in normal subjects. Circulation 1981;63:1166–1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Widman LE, Liebman J, Thomas C, et al. Electrocardiographic body surface potential maps of the QRS and T of normal young men. Qualitative description and selected quantifications. J Electrocardiol 1988;21: 121–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kozlikova K, Hulin I, Murin J, et al. Electrocardiographic estimation of left ventricular hypertrophy regression by verapamil. A longitudinal follow‐up Chapter in Bacharova L, Macfarlane PW. (eds). Electrocardiology '97. World Scientific; Singapore , New Jersey , London , Hong Kong , 1997;pp: 239–242. [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kornreich F, Montague TJ, Rautaharju PM. Identification of first acute Q wave and non‐Q wave myocardial infarction by multivariate analysis of body surface potential maps. Circulation 1991;84:2442–2453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Menown IBA, Allen J, McAnderson JC, et al. ST depression only on the initial 12‐lead ECG: Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2001. (in press). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Préda I. ST‐segment mapping in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: A new role for an old method. Editorial. Eur Heart J 2001. (in press). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Vincent GM, Abildskov JA, Burgess MJ, et al. Diagnosis of old myocardial infarction by body surface isopotential mapping. Am J Cardiol 1977;39:510–515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Ambroggi L, Bertoni T, Rabbia C, et al. Body surface potential maps in old inferior myocardial infarction. Assessment of diagnostic criteria. J Electrocardiol 1986;19: 225–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Flowers NC, Horan LG, Sohi GS, et al. New evidence for inferoposterior myocardial infarction on surface potential maps. Am J Cardiol 1976;38:576–581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Gardner MJ, Montague TJ, Armstrong CS, et al. Vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmia: Assessment by mapping of body surface potential. Circulation 1986;73:684–692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Sridharan MR, Horan LG, Hand RC, et al. Use of body surface maps to identify vessel site of coronary occlusion. J Electrocardiol 1989;22(Suppl.):72–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Horan LG, Sridharan MR, Killam HAW, et al. Patterns of body surface potential and ventriculograms specific to occlusion of subdivisions of the coronary arteries. Circ Res 1990;67:683–693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Préda I, Balogh F, Molnár F, et al. Diagnostic Value of Exercise Precordial Mapping and Exercise 201‐Thallium Scintigraphy in the Evaluation and Follow‐up of Coronary Angioplasty Chapter in Abel H. (ed): Electrocardiology '88. Amsterdam , Excerpta Medica, 1989, pp:369–372. [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Préda I, Nadeau RA, Savard P, et al. QRS alterations in body surface potential distributions during percutaneous translurninal coronary angioplasty in single‐vessel disease. J Electrocardiol 1994;27:311–322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Shenasa M, Hamel D, Nasmith J, et al. Body surface potential mapping of ST‐segment shift in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Electrocardiol 1993;26:43–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Préda I, Bukosza I, Kozmann GY, et al. Surface potential distribution on the human thoracic surface in left bundle branch block. Jap Heart J 1979;20:7–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Taccardi B, Ambroggi L, Riva D. Chest maps of heart potentials in right bundle branch block. J Electrocardiol 1969;2:109–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Liebman J, Rudy Y, Diaz P, et al. The spectrum of right bundle branch block as manifested in electrocardiographic body surface potential maps. J E!ectrocardiol 1984;17:329–346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Antaloczy Z, Medvegy M. The Calculated Nondipolar Body Surface Potential Maps in Right Bundle Branch Block. Chapter in Macfarlane PW, Padua F. (eds): Electrocardiology 92 1992, pp:49–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Préda I, Antalóczy Z, Bukosza I, et al. New Electrocardiological Infarct Criteria in the Presence of Left Bundle Branch Block (Surface Mapping Study) Chapter in Macfarlane PW, (ed): Progress in Electrocardiology. London , Pittman, 1979, pp. 231–235. [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Musso E, Stilli D, Macchi E, et al. Body surface maps in left bundle branch block uncomplicated or complicated by myocardial infarction, left ventricular hypertrophy or myocardial ischemia. J Electrocardiol 1987;20:1–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Préda I, Antaloczy Z, Kozmann GY. Left bundle branch block and chronic myocardial infarction: Surface mapping evidence and electrocardiological signs. Jap Heart J 1982;23(Suppl.):397–399. [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Ambroggi L, Taccardi B, Macchi E. Body surface maps of heart potentials. Tentative localization of preexcited areas in forty‐two Wolff‐Parkinson‐White patients. Circulation 1976;54: 251–263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Préda I, Mester J, Antalóczy Z, et al. Comparison of Body Surface Mapping and Phase Display Methods to Localize Bypass Pathways in Wolff‐Parkinson‐White Syndrome in van Dam RT, van Oosterom A. (eds): Electrocardiographic Body Surface Mapping. Boston , Martinus Nijhoff, 1986, pp. 99–104. [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Liebman J, Olshansky B, Zeno JA, et al. Accurate Determination of the Ventricular Insertion Sites of Accessory AV Connections in the Wolff‐Parkinson‐White Syndrome with Electrocardiographic Body Surface Potential Map Chapter in Antaloczy Z, Préda I, Kékes E. (eds): Advances in Electrocardiology. Amsterdam , Elsevier, 1990, pp. 165–168. [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Pinter A, Molin F, Savard P, et al. Body surface mapping of retrograde P waves in the intact dog by simulation of accessory pathway re‐entry. Can J Cardiol 2000;16:175–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Klug D, Ferracci A, Molin F, et al. Body surface potential distributions during idiopathic ventricular tachycardia. Circulation 1995;91:2002–2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Green LS, Lux RL, Ershler PR, et al. Resolution of pace mapping stimulus site separation using body surface potentials. Circulation 1994;90:462–468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Sippens Groenewegen A, Peeters HAP, Jessurun ER, et al. Body surface mapping during pacing at multiple sites in the human atrium. Circulation 1998;97:369–380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Osugi J, Ohta T, Toyama J, et al. Body surface isopotential maps in old inferior myocardial infarction undetectable by 12 lead electrocardiogram. J Electrocardiol 1984;17:55–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Hirai M, Ohta T, Kinoshita A, et al. Body surface isopotential maps in old anterior myocardial infarction undetectable by 12 lead electrocardiograms. Am Heart J 1984;108:975–982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Ambroggi L, Bertoni T, Breghi M, et al. Diagnostic value of body surface potential mapping in old anterior non‐Q myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol 1988;21:321–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Medvegy M, Preda I, Nadeau RA, et al. Diagnosis of Non‐Q Wave Myocardial Infarction by Isoarea Departure Maps Using Different Time Period Chapter in Bacharova L, Macfarlane PW. (eds): Electrocardiology '97, World Scientific; Singapore , New Jersey , London , Hong Kong , 1997, pp:210–213. [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Medvegy M, Préda I, Savard P, et al. A new body surface isopotential map evaluation method to detect minor potential losses in non‐Q wave myocardial infarction. Circulation 2000;101:1115–1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology are provided here courtesy of International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc. and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

RESOURCES