Abstract
Background: Previous studies have shown that only 80% of narrow QRS supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) types can be differentiated by standard 12‐lead electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria. This study was designed to determine the value of some new ECG criteria in differentiating narrow QRS SVT.
Methods and Results : 120 ECGs demonstrating paroxysmal narrow QRS complex tachycardia (QRS s 0.11 ms and rate > 120 beats/min) were analyzed. Forty atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT), 70 atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), and 10 atrial tachycardia defined with electrophysiologic study (EPS) consisted the study group. Eight surface ECG criteria were found to be significantly different between tachycardia types by univariate analysis. P waves separate from the QRS complex were observed more frequently in AVRT (70%) and atrial tachycardia (80%). Pseudo r’deflection in lead V1, pseudo S wave in inferior leads, and cycle length alternans were more common in AVNRT (55, 20, and 6%, respectively). QRS alternans was also present during AVRT (28%). ST‐segment depression (≧ 2 mm) or T‐wave inversion, or both, were present more often in AVRT (60%) than in AVNRT (27%). During sinus rhythm, manifest preexcitation was observed more often in patients with AVRT (42%). When a P wave was present, RP/PR interval ratio > 1 was more common in atrial tachycardia (90%). By multivariate analysis, presence of a P wave separate from the QRS complex, pseudo r’deflection in lead V1, QRS alternans, preexcitation during sinus rhythm, ST‐segment depression > 2 mm or T‐wave inversion, or both, were independent predictors of tachycardia type.
Conclusions: Several new ECG criteria may be useful in differentiation of SVT types. Prediction of mechanism prior to EPS may provide additional benefits concerning the fluoroscopic exposure time and cardiac catheterization procedure. A.N.E. 2002;7(2):120–126
Keywords: narrow QRS tachycardia, electrocardiography, electrophysiologic study, diagnosis
REFERENCES
- 1. Jackman WH, Wang X, Friday KJ, et al. Catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathways (Wolff‐Parkinson‐White syndrome) by radiofrequency current. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1605–1611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Calkins H, Sausa J, Rosenheck S, et al. Diagnosis and cure of the Wolff‐Parkinson‐White syndrome or paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia during single electrophysiologic test. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1612–1618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Chiang CE, Chen SA, Wu TJ, et al. Incidence, significance and pharmacological response of catheter‐induced mechanical trauma in patients receiving radio‐frequency ablation for supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation 1994;90:1847–1854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Wu D, Denes P, Amat‐y‐Lean F, et al. Clinical electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic observation in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 1978;41:1045–1051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Josephson ME. Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia: An electrophysiologic approach. Am J Cardiol 1978;41:1123–1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Wellens HJJ, Durrer D. The role of an accessory atrioventricular pathway in reciprocal tachycardia. Circulation 1975;52:58–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Bör FW, Brugada P, Dassen WRM, et al. Differential diagnosis of tachycardia with narrow QRS complex (shorter than 0.12 second). Am J Cardiol 1984;54: 555–560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kay GN, Pressley JC, Packer DL, et al. Value of the 12‐lead electrocardiogram in discriminating atrioventricular nodal reciprocating tachycardia from circus movement atrioventricular tachycardia utilizing a retrograde accessory pathway. Am J Cardiol 1987;59:296–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kalbfleisch SJ, El‐Atassi R, Calkins H, et al. Differentiation of paroxysmal narrow QRS complex tachycardia using the 12‐lead electrocardiogram. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:85–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Morady F, DiCarlo L, Baesman JH, et al. Determinants of QRS alternans during narrow QRS tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;9:489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Green M, Heddle B, Dassen W, et al. Value of QRS alternation in determining the site of origin of narrow QRS supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation 1983;68:368–373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Petsas AA, Anastassiades C, Antonopoulos AG. Exercise testing for assessment of the significance of ST segment depression observed during episodes of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Eur Heart J 1990;11: 974–979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kim YN, Sausa J, El‐Atassi R, et al. Magnitude of ST segment depression during paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Am Heart J 1991;122:1486–1487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Nelson SD, Kau WH, Annesley T, et al. Significance of ST segment depression during paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;12:383–387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Riva SI, Bella PD, Fassini G, et al. Value of analysis of ST segment changes during tachycardia in determining type of narrow QRS complex tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:1480–1485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Josephson ME. Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: Techniques and Interpretation. Philadelphia , Lea & Febiger, 1993, pp. 5–70. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Obel OA, Camm AJ. Supraventricular tachycardia ECG diagnosis and anatomy. Eur Heart J 1997;18(Suppl. C):C2–C11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]