Abstract
Instruction
Longer atrial fibrillation (AF) durations have higher recurrence rates after rhythm control. However, there is limited data on the effect of the AF duration on recurrence after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation (AFCA). In the present study, we investigated the rhythm outcome of AFCA according to the AF duration based on the first electrocardiogram (ECG) diagnosis.
Methods and Results
We included 1005 patients with AF (75% male, 59 ± 11 years old) who underwent AFCA and whose first ECG diagnosis time point was evident. The clinical characteristics and rhythm outcomes were compared based on the AF duration (≤3 years, n = 537; >3 years, n = 468) and AF burden (paroxysmal atrial fibrillation [PAF], n = 387; persistent atrial fibrillation [PeAF], n = 618). Longer AF durations were associated with older age (P = .020), larger left atrial size (P = .009) and a higher number of patients with hypertension (P < .001) or PeAF (P < .001). During 24 ± 22 months of follow‐up, the postablation clinical recurrence rate was higher in patients with a longer AF duration (logrank P = .002). The AF recurrence rate was significantly higher in PeAF patients with an AF duration >3 years (logrank P = 0.009), but not in subjects with PAF (logrank P = .939). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, a longer AF duration was significantly associated with a higher clinical recurrence rate after AFCA in PeAF patients (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.06; range, 1.03‐0.10; P = 0.001), but not PAF.
Conclusion
Although longer AF duration was associated with higher clinical recurrence rates after AFCA, the rate was significant in patients with PeAF lasting >3 years, but not in PAF patients.
Keywords: atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, duration, persistent, recurrence
1. INTRODUCTION
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a chronic degenerative disease with a 1.5% prevalence of the total population and continuously increasing in the elderly population. 1 AF is also a progressive disease with annual progression rates of 7% to 15%, 2 , 3 and more than 50% of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) will progress to persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) within 10 years. 4 AF progresses more rapidly to more persistent forms in PeAF than in PAF patients, 5 and in patients with a higher number of cardiovascular risk factors. 6 The aggressive rhythm control slows the AF progression, and the AF progression rate is 3.3‐fold lower in the rhythm‐control group than the rate control group. 3 , 6 Catheter ablation of AF is an effective rhythm control strategy that reduces the AF burden, heart failure mortality, 7 risks of a stroke, 8 and risk of cognitive dysfunction. 9
The AF duration has been considered an important prognostic factor for the rhythm outcome after a maze procedure 10 or AF ablation. 11 However, AF is less consistent with symptoms and asymptomatic subclinical AF is common. Reportedly, over 40% of patients did not complain of any significant symptoms under an appropriate rate control. 12 Therefore, determining the exact AF duration based on the symptoms is difficult. However, we measured the time period from the first electrocardiogram (ECG) diagnosis of AF to the de novo atrial fibrillation catheter ablation (AFCA) in our AF ablation study population. In addition, we monitored the postablation AF recurrence by a consistent long‐term rhythm monitoring protocol according to the 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert consensus statement guidelines. 13 , 14 In the present study, we tested the hypothesis whether the documented ECG‐based AF duration was closely associated with a high recurrence rate after radiofrequency AFCA.
2. METHODS
2.1. Study population
The study protocol adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Yonsei University Health System. All patients provided written informed consent for inclusion in the Yonsei AF Ablation Registry Database (registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02138695). From March 2009 to September 2017, 1005 patients who underwent AFCA for AF and whose first ECG diagnosis time point was evident were analyzed (75% male, 59 ± 11 years of age, 39% PAF). AF onset was defined as the index ECG showing AF. AF that terminates spontaneously or with intervention within 7 days of onset was classified as PAF. 15 We analyzed the sensitivity and specificity for predicting clinical recurrences of AF after AFCA on the basis of the different cut‐off ranges of the AF duration (Figure 1 and Table S1). As a result of the analysis, the 3‐year cut‐off value represented the best dichotomy among a number of tested cut‐off values. Therefore, we compared the patients with an AF duration of less than 3 years and those with that longer than 3 years based on a preliminary adjusted hazard ratio (HR) analysis. The clinical characteristics and rhythm outcomes were compared based on the AF duration (≤3 years, n = 537; >3 years, n = 468) and AF burden (PAF, n = 387; PeAF, n = 618). Exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) valvular AF, (b) structural heart disease other than left ventricular hypertrophy, (c) left atrial (LA) diameter ≥60 mm, and (d) a history of a previous AF ablation or cardiac surgery. All antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) were discontinued for a minimum period of five half‐lives before the procedure. Anticoagulation therapy was maintained before the catheter ablation. The anatomy of the LA and the pulmonary veins (PVs) in all patients was imaged using three‐dimensional (3D) spiral computed tomography (CT) scans (64 Channel, LightSpeed Volume CT, Philips, Brilliance 63, Amsterdam, Netherlands).
Figure 1.
The adjusted hazard ratio of atrial fibrillation (AF) duration for AF recurrence. Adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, stroke or transient ischemic attack, left atrium diameter, left ventricle ejection fraction
2.2. Electroanatomical mapping and echocardiographic evaluation
Intracardiac electrograms were recorded using the Prucka CardioLab Electrophysiology System (General Electric Medical Systems, Inc, Milwaukee, WI), and AFCA was performed in all patients using 3D electroanatomical mapping (NavX, St Jude Medical, Inc, Minnetonka, MN) merged with 3D spiral CT. Transseptal punctures were made and multiview pulmonary venograms were obtained. Systemic anticoagulation was performed with intravenous heparin to maintain an activated clotting time of 350 to 400 seconds during the procedure. For electroanatomical mapping, the 3D geometry of both the LA and the PVs was generated using the NavX system and then merged with 3D spiral CT images. LA electrogram voltage maps were generated during high right atrial pacing at 500 ms to prevent rate‐dependent activation changes after maintaining sinus rhythm by circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) with or without cardioversion. If frequently recurring AF persisted after three attempts at cardioversion, no further efforts were made to generate an LA voltage map. The peak‐to‐peak amplitude of the contact bipolar electrograms was obtained from 350 to 500 points on the LA endocardium and the mean LA electrogram voltage was calculated.
All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography (Sonos 5500; Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA; Vivid 7, GE Vingmed Ultrasound, Horten, Norway) before the AFCA. Transesophageal echocardiography or intracardiac echocardiography was performed to exclude any intracardiac thrombi. The emptying velocity of the LA appendage was measured in all patients.
2.3. Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation
The details of the AFCA technique and strategy were described in our previous study. 16 Briefly, for the CPVI ablation, continuous circumferential lesions were created at the level of the LA antrum encircling the right and left PVs guided by the NavX system using an open‐irrigated, 3.5‐mm tip deflectable catheter at 30 to 35 W and 45°C (ThermoCool, Johnson & Johnson, Inc, Diamond Bar, CA; Cool Flex, St Jude Medical, Inc). A CPVI and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation were performed in all patients. The endpoints of both the CPVI and cavotricuspid isthmus block were defined based on bidirectional pacing. For patients with persistent AF, a roofline, posterior‐inferior line, and anterior line were added as a standard lesion set. At the operator's discretion, additional ablation of the superior vena cava, non‐PV foci, or complex fractionated electrograms was conducted. The procedure ended when no immediate recurrence of AF was observed within 10 minutes after cardioversion with an isoproterenol infusion (5‐10 μg/min). Non‐PV foci under an isoproterenol infusion were also ablated.
2.4. Postablation follow‐up
The patients without antiarrhythmic medications were discharged after the procedure unless early recurrence of AF/AT or symptomatic frequent atrial premature beats were evident. Patients visited the outpatient clinic regularly at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and then every 6 months or whenever symptoms occurred after the AFCA. All patients underwent ECG at each visit and 24‐hour Holter recordings at 3 and 6 months and every 6 months thereafter following the 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement guidelines. 13 Holter monitoring or event monitor recordings were obtained when patients reported symptoms of palpitation suggestive of arrhythmia recurrence. AF recurrence was defined as any episode of AF or AT of at least 30 seconds in duration. Any ECG documentation of an AF recurrence within a 3‐month blanking period was diagnosed as an early recurrence and an AF recurrence more than 3 months after the procedure was diagnosed as a clinical recurrence.
2.5. Statistical analyses
Continuous variables were summarized as the mean ± standard deviation and compared using a Student t test and analysis of variance. Categorical variables were summarized as a percentage of the group total and compared using the χ 2 test or Fisher's exact test. To predict clinical recurrence of AF after AFCA on the basis of different cut‐off ranges of AF duration, receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify the predictors of clinical recurrence. Variables with a P value less than .05 based on univariate analysis were selected for the multivariate analysis. In addition, if a significant correlation between the selected variables (R > .5) was observed, only one variable was used to avoid multicollinearity in the multivariate regression analysis. A Kaplan‐Meier analysis with a logrank test was used to calculate the AF recurrence‐free survival over time and to compare the recurrence rates across the groups. A P value less than .05 was considered statistically significant. The statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 25.0; Statistical Package for Social Sciences, Chicago, IL) software for Windows.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Baseline characteristics
The baseline clinical characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1. We compared the patient with AF duration less than 3 years and those with longer than 3 years based on preliminary adjusted HR analysis (Figure 1). The sex distribution did not statistically significantly differ between the two groups. A longer AF duration was associated with older age (P = .020), a higher number of patients with hypertension (P < .001) and PeAF (P < .001). The LA diameter on echocardiography also increased as the AF duration increased (P = .009), while the endocardial voltage of the LA decreased as the AF duration increased (P < .001). Other comorbidities including the CHA2DS2‐VASc score and baseline echocardiographic and CT parameters did not significantly differ between the groups.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of the patients
| AF duration ≤3 y (n = 537) | AF duration >3 y (n = 468) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 58.2 ± 11.2 | 59.7 ± 10.0 | .020* |
| Male sex, n (%) | 391 (72.8) | 363 (77.6) | .083 |
| Paroxysmal AF, n (%) | 238 (44.3) | 149 (31.8) | <.001* |
| BSA, m2 | 1.81 ± 0.19 | 1.82 ± 0.18 | .795 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 25.1 ± 3.1 | 25.0 ± 3.4 | .529 |
| Comorbidities | |||
| Heart failure, n (%) | 75 (14.0) | 66 (14.1) | .951 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 211 (39.3) | 237 (50.6) | <.001* |
| Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 88 (16.4) | 73 (15.6) | .745 |
| Stroke or TIA, n (%) | 84 (15.6) | 64 (13.7) | .380 |
| Vascular Disease, n (%) | 74 (13.8) | 69 (14.7) | .663 |
| CHA2DS2‐VASc score | 1.8 ± 1.6 | 1.8 ± 1.5 | .567 |
| Echocardiography | |||
| LA diameter, mm | 42.1 ± 6.1 | 43.2 ± 6.3 | .009* |
| LA volume index, mL/m2 | 39.2 ± 13.3 | 40.7 ± 13.0 | .077 |
| LV ejection fraction, % | 62.5 ± 8.3 | 61.9 ± 9.3 | .271 |
| E/Em | 10.3 ± 4.6 | 10.4 ± 4.0 | .865 |
| LVEDD, mm | 49.9 ± 4.8 | 50.2 ± 4.6 | .264 |
| LAA emptying velocity, cm/s | 44.8 ± 21.7 | 43.1 ± 20.6 | .314 |
| CT/NavX (n = 976) | |||
| LA volume/BSA, mL/m2 | 87.7 ± 24.1 | 91.3 ± 26.0 | .025* |
| Pericardial fat volume, cm3 | 128.7 ± 58.9 | 128.9 ± 56.0 | .956 |
| LA endocardial voltage, mV | 1.28 ± 0.64 | 1.04 ± 0.55 | <.001* |
Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; BSA, body surface area; CT, computed tomography; E/Em, early mitral inflow velocity over the early diastolic mitral annular velocity; LA, left atrium; LAA, left atrial appendage; LV, left ventricle; LVEDD, left ventricular end‐diastolic dimension; TIA, transient ischemic attack.
P < .05.
3.2. Procedural results and clinical outcome after catheter ablation of AF
The procedural results and clinical outcomes are summarized in Table 2. The total procedure time (P = .152) and ablation time (P = .548) did not statistically differ between the two groups, however, the AAD utility rates at discharge were higher in the patients with a longer preprocedural AF duration (14.2% vs 21.0%; P = .005). During 24 ± 22 months of follow‐up after the AF ablation, the early recurrence rate (27.6% vs 39.0%; P < .001) and clinical recurrence rate (24.9% vs 36.9%; P < .001) were significantly higher in the longer AF duration group (Table 2). The Kaplan‐Meier analysis also showed a significantly higher clinical recurrence of AF in patients with a longer preprocedural AF duration (Figure 2, logrank P = .002). In the subgroup analysis based on the AF type, the clinical recurrence rate did not significantly differ among the patients with PAF (Figure 3A, logrank P = .939). However, in the PeAF group, the clinical recurrence rate was significantly higher in patients with a longer AF duration (Figure 3B, logrank P = .009).
Table 2.
Procedural results and clinical outcomes
| AF duration ≤3 y (n = 537) | AF duration >3 y (n = 468) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Procedure time, min | 195.2 ± 48.4 | 200.0 ± 56.5 | .152 |
| Ablation time, s | 5275 ± 1656 | 5204 ± 2009 | .548 |
| AAD at discharge, n (%) | 76 (14.2) | 98 (21.0) | .005* |
| Follow‐up duration, mo | 23.0 ± 20.9 | 24.2 ± 22.9 | .363 |
| Early recurrence, n (%) | 141 (27.6) | 174 (39.0) | <.001* |
| Clinical recurrence, n (%) | 127 (24.9) | 164 (36.9) | <.001* |
Abbreviations: AAD, antiarrhythmic drug; AF, atrial fibrillation.
P < .05.
Figure 2.
Kaplan‐Meier analysis of the AF recurrence‐free survival after catheter ablation in the total study population. AF, atrial fibrillation
Figure 3.
Kaplan‐Meier analysis of the AF recurrence‐free survival after catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF (A) and persistent AF (B). AF, atrial fibrillation
3.3. AF duration as a predictor of a clinical recurrence of AF after catheter ablation
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the predictors of a clinical recurrence of AF after catheter ablation (Table 3). In patients with PAF, a female sex (HR, 0.470; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.233‐0.948; P = .035), a lower body surface area (HR, 0.131; 95% CI, 0.019‐0.913; P = .040), and a lower LA voltage (HR, 0.386; 95% CI, 0.173‐0.862; P = .020) were associated with a higher clinical recurrence of AF after catheter ablation based on the univariate analysis. The AF duration was not significantly associated with a clinical recurrence after AFCA in patients with PAF. On the other hands, in patients with PeAF, a larger LA diameter (HR, 1.042; 95% CI, 1.012‐1.073; P = .005), a lower LA voltage (HR, 0.331; 95% CI, 0.213‐0.514; P < .001), and a longer AF duration (HR, 1.065; 95% CI, 1.033‐1.099; P < .001) were associated with a higher clinical recurrence of AF after catheter ablation based on the univariate analysis. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, a larger LA diameter (adjusted HR, 1.058; 95% CI, 1.015‐1.102; P = .007), a lower LA voltage (adjusted HR, 0.365; 95% CI, 0.227‐0.586; P < .001) and a longer AF duration (adjusted HR, 1.064; 95% CI, 1.025‐1.104; P = .001) was significantly associated with a higher clinical recurrence of AF in patients with PeAF.
Table 3.
Predictors for a clinical recurrence after catheter ablation of AF
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value | |
| Paroxysmal AF (n = 387) | ||||
| Age, y | 0.989 (0.959‐1.021) | .499 | 0.970 (0.935‐1.008) | .117 |
| Male sex | 0.470 (0.233‐0.948) | .035* | 0.537 (0.172‐1.677) | .284 |
| BSA, m2 | 0.131 (0.019‐0.913) | .040* | 0.402 (0.015‐10.490) | .584 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 0.940 (0.836‐1.056) | .295 | ||
| Heart failure | 0.722 (0.211‐2.475) | .605 | ||
| Hypertension | 1.294 (0.646‐2.593) | .467 | ||
| Diabetes mellitus | 0.696 (0.236‐2.057) | .513 | ||
| Stroke or TIA | 2.106 (0.929‐4.775) | .075 | ||
| Vascular disease | 1.298 (0.510‐3.300) | .584 | ||
| LA diameter, mm | 0.958 (0.899‐1.021) | .187 | ||
| LAVI, mL/m2 | 1.003 (0.975‐1.032) | .820 | ||
| LV ejection fraction (%) | 1.014 (0.970‐1.060) | .544 | ||
| E/Em | 0.939 (0.845‐1.043) | .238 | ||
| LA voltage, mV | 0.386 (0.173‐0.862) | .020* | 0.455 (0.191‐1.086) | .076 |
| AF duration, y | 0.923 (0.815‐1.046) | .208 | 0.983 (0.870‐1.110) | .781 |
| Persistent AF (n = 618) | ||||
| Age, y | 0.996 (0.981‐1.011) | .588 | 0.990 (0.971‐1.010) | .336 |
| Male sex | 1.063 (0.721‐1.569) | .757 | 1.047 (0.626‐1.752) | .860 |
| BSA, m2 | 1.364 (0.569‐3.267) | .486 | ||
| BMI, kg/m2 | 1.008 (0.961‐1.058) | .737 | ||
| Heart failure | 0.519 (0.325‐0.829) | .006* | 0.429 (0.230‐0.800) | .008* |
| Hypertension | 1.029 (0.744‐1.423) | .863 | ||
| Diabetes mellitus | 0.729 (0.469‐1.133) | .160 | ||
| Stroke or TIA | 0.788 (0.497‐1.250) | .312 | ||
| Vascular disease | 1.034 (0.658‐1.625) | .886 | ||
| LA diameter, mm | 1.042 (1.012‐1.073) | .005* | 1.058 (1.015‐1.102) | .007* |
| LAVI, mL/m2 | 1.008 (0.995‐1.021) | .234 | ||
| LV ejection fraction (%) | 1.009 (0.991‐1.029) | .322 | ||
| E/Em | 0.976 (0.939‐1.014) | .207 | ||
| LA voltage, mV | 0.331 (0.213‐0.514) | <.001* | 0.365 (0.227‐0.586) | <.001* |
| AF duration, y | 1.065 (1.033‐1.099) | <.001* | 1.064 (1.025‐1.104) | .001* |
Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; BMI, body mass index; BSA, body surface area; CI, confidence interval; E/Em, early mitral inflow velocity over the early diastolic mitral annular velocity; HR, hazard ratio; LA, left atrium; LAVI, left atrial volume index; LV, left ventricle; TIA, transient ischemic attack.
P < .05.
Given the higher comorbidity of patients with PeAF, we additionally performed a propensity score match analysis between patients with PeAF and PAF in terms of age, sex, and the comorbidities that make up the CHA2DS2‐VASc score. After a propensity score matching, the matched population showed results consistent with the overall population in terms of the AF burden (paroxysmal or persistent) and AF duration (Table S2 and Figure 4).
Figure 4.
Kaplan‐Meier analysis of the AF recurrence‐free survival after catheter ablation in patients with persistent AF after a propensity score‐matching between patients with persistent and paroxysmal AF. AF, atrial fibrillation
4. DISCUSSION
4.1. Main findings
In the present study, the time period from the first ECG diagnosis of AF to the AFCA and clinical recurrence was measured using guideline‐based rhythm monitoring. The longer duration of AF was associated with a higher clinical recurrence rate after catheter ablation but was only significant in the patients with PeAF lasting more than 3 years. An AF duration‐dependent difference in the clinical recurrence rate was not observed in the patients with PAF.
4.2. AF progression and catheter ablation
AF is a chronic degenerative rhythm disorder with continuous progression associated with aging, LA enlargement, and heart failure. 17 AF progression is more significant and accelerated in patients with associated hypertension, valvular disease, chronic lung disease, and a previous ischemic stroke. 18 , 19 AFCA is an effective rhythm control strategy to reduce the AF burden, however, the evolution of the abnormal atrial substrate progresses despite a successful ablation procedure and likewise the aging process. 20 Furthermore, the development and advances in the catheter ablation technology, as well as the accumulated experience, have not been translated into a significant procedural success. 21 Park et al 14 found that extra‐PV ablation and 1‐year recurrence rates in the AF ablation study cohort have been decreasing in part due to the improved catheter technology in the past 9 years. However, patients with a first recurrence continue to appear consistently even after 5 years from successful catheter ablation. Obesity, 22 metabolic syndromes, 23 and obstructive sleep apnea 24 are associated with a high probability of an AF recurrence after catheter ablation. Therefore, strategies aiming at a reduction in AF development or progression, such as lifestyle and risk factor management, are necessary to improve the therapeutic outcome of AFCA. 25 , 26 , 27 , 28
4.3. Why persistent AF ablation is more likely affected by the AF duration?
In the present study, a longer AF duration, especially longer than 3 years, was associated with a higher clinical recurrence of atrial arrhythmias after catheter ablation in patients with PeAF, but not in subjects with PAF. There are several potential explanations for this outcome. First, PAF or PeAF without significant progression can be mostly manageable by a circumferential PV isolation. 21 However, PeAF with significant remodeling is generally accompanied by multiple non‐PV triggers 29 and appropriate treatment is limited to the current ablation technology. Second, the PeAF category includes an excessively broad spectrum of AF progression and remodeling compared with PAF. The definition of PeAF in the current guidelines 30 is based only on a 1‐week sustained duration of AF and does not reflect the degree of atrial remodeling. Some of the early PeAF cases regressed to PAF after AAD therapy, however, several progressed to permanent AF. Third, the presence of subclinical AF may have delayed the ECG‐based diagnosis of AF. 12 Therefore, in the case of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic AF, the ECG‐based AF duration may be underestimated compared with the actual AF duration in patients with PeAF lasting more than 3 years.
4.4. Clinical implications
The recommended AF rhythm control in the current guidelines is intended for patients with symptomatic AF rather than ECG‐based AF. 30 , 31 However, AF progression to PeAF or permanent AF is accompanied by high cardiovascular risk and long‐term mortality. 32 , 33 In addition, metabolic syndrome, which is associated with AF progression, increases the nonthromboembolic adverse cardiac outcomes in patients with AF. 34 Therefore, a symptom‐based AF ablation can be justified in the PAF state; however, when progressing to PeAF, rhythm control should be considered even in patients with minimal symptoms to prevent the progression to permanent AF. On the basis of the results from the current analysis, a favorable outcome of AFCA can be expected for patients with PAF regardless of the AF duration, or those with PeAF found within 3 years. When performing catheter ablation for patients with PeAF that has lasted more than 3 years, a higher recurrence rate should be carefully considered.
4.5. Limitations
The present study had several limitations. First, although we attempted to define the duration of AF in patients with a clear time point for the first ECG diagnosis, the possibility of a discrepancy between the ECG‐based AF duration and actual AF duration remains. Especially in patients with PAF, the duration of AF was more difficult to determine and thus the relationship between an AF recurrence and the AF duration in those patients was less clear. Second, contrary to the continuous rhythm monitoring using an implantable loop recorder, the current guideline‐based consistent rhythm monitoring schedule could not detect all the subclinical AF episodes. Third, this was an observational study from a single‐center cohort that included a highly selected group of patients referred for AFCA. Despite this limitation, a realistic and consistent rhythm monitoring method was applied for all patients included in the AF ablation study cohort based on real‐world practice.
5. CONCLUSION
A longer duration of AF was associated with a higher clinical recurrence rate after catheter ablation; however, a significance was only observed in patients with PeAF of more than 3 years. An AF duration‐dependent difference in the clinical recurrence rate was not observed in patients with PAF.
Supporting information
Supporting information
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors like to thank John Martin for his linguistic assistance.
Yu HT, Kim I‐S, Kim T‐H, et al. Persistent atrial fibrillation over 3 years is associated with higher recurrence after catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31:457–464. 10.1111/jce.14345
Funding informationThis study was supported by grants HI18C0070 and HI19C0114 from the Korea Health 21 R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare and a grant NRF‐2017R1A2B4003983; 2017R1C1B1008292 from the Basic Science Research Program run by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF).
Disclosures: None.
REFERENCES
- 1. Kim D, Yang PS, Jang E, et al. 10‐year nationwide trends of the incidence, prevalence, and adverse outcomes of non‐valvular atrial fibrillation nationwide health insurance data covering the entire Korean population. Am Heart J. 2018;202:20‐26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Hohnloser SH, Crijns HJGM, van Eickels M, et al. Effect of dronedarone on cardiovascular events in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:668‐678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Camm AJ, Breithardt G, Crijns H, et al. Real‐life observations of clinical outcomes with rhythm‐ and rate‐control therapies for atrial fibrillation RECORDAF (Registry on Cardiac Rhythm Disorders Assessing the Control of Atrial Fibrillation). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:493‐501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Padfield GJ, Steinberg C, Swampillai J, et al. Progression of paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation: 10‐year follow‐up in the Canadian Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:801‐807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Nieuwlaat R, Prins MH, Le Heuzey JY, et al. Prognosis, disease progression, and treatment of atrial fibrillation patients during 1 year: follow‐up of the Euro Heart Survey on atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:1181‐1189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. De Vos CB, Breithardt G, Camm AJ, et al. Progression of atrial fibrillation in the REgistry on Cardiac rhythm disORDers assessing the control of Atrial Fibrillation cohort: clinical correlates and the effect of rhythm‐control therapy. Am Heart J. 2012;163:887‐893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Marrouche NF, Brachmann J, Andresen D, et al. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:417‐427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Mansour M, Heist EK, Agarwal R, et al. Stroke and cardiovascular events after ablation or antiarrhythmic drugs for treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2018;121:1192‐1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Jin MN, Kim TH, Kang KW, et al. Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation improves 1‐year follow‐up cognitive function, especially in patients with impaired cognitive function. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019;12:e007197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Ad N, Holmes SD, Shuman DJ, Pritchard G. Impact of atrial fibrillation duration on the success of first‐time concomitant Cox maze procedures. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100:1613‐1618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Stabile G, Trines SA, Arbelo E, et al. Atrial fibrillation history impact on catheter ablation outcome. Findings from the ESC‐EHRA Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Long‐Term Registry. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;42:313‐320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Steg PG, Alam S, Chiang CE, et al. Symptoms, functional status and quality of life in patients with controlled and uncontrolled atrial fibrillation: data from the RealiseAF cross‐sectional international registry. Heart. 2012;98:195‐201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow‐up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design: a report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); and in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(9):632.e21‐696.e621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Park JW, Yu HT, Kim TH, et al. Trends and outcome of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation over 9 years‐ focus on empirical extra‐pulmonary vein ablation. Circ J. 2019;83:304‐312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2014;130(23):2071‐2104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Yu HT, Shim J, Park J, et al. When is it appropriate to stop non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants before catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation? A multicentre prospective randomized study. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(19):1531‐1537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Proietti R, Hadjis A, AlTurki A, et al. A systematic review on the progression of paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation: shedding new light on the effects of catheter ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;1:105‐115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kerr CR, Humphries KH, Talajic M, et al. Progression to chronic atrial fibrillation after the initial diagnosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from the Canadian Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. Am Heart J. 2005;149:489‐496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. de Vos CB, Pisters R, Nieuwlaat R, et al. Progression from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation clinical correlates and prognosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:725‐731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Teh AW, Kistler PM, Lee G, et al. Long‐term effects of catheter ablation for lone atrial fibrillation: progressive atrial electroanatomic substrate remodeling despite successful ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:473‐480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Verma A, Jiang C, Betts TR, et al. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1812‐1822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Wong CX, Sullivan T, Sun MT, et al. Obesity and the risk of incident, post‐operative, and post‐ablation atrial fibrillation: a meta‐analysis of 626,603 individuals in 51 studies. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;1:139‐152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Baek YS, Yang PS, Kim TH, et al. Delayed recurrence of atrial fibrillation 2years after catheter ablation is associated with metabolic syndrome. Int J Cardiol. 2016;223:276‐281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Ng CY, Liu T, Shehata M, Stevens S, Chugh SS, Wang X. Meta‐analysis of obstructive sleep apnea as predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108:47‐51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Lau DH, Nattel S, Kalman JM, Sanders P. Modifiable risk factors and atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2017;136:583‐596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Pathak RK, Elliott A, Middeldorp ME, et al. Impact of CARDIOrespiratory FITness on arrhythmia recurrence in obese individuals with atrial fibrillation: the CARDIO‐FIT study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:985‐996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Pathak RK, Middeldorp ME, Lau DH, et al. Aggressive risk factor reduction study for atrial fibrillation and implications for the outcome of ablation: the ARREST‐AF cohort study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:2222‐2231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Pathak RK, Middeldorp ME, Meredith M, et al. Long‐term effect of goal‐directed weight management in an atrial fibrillation cohort: a long‐term follow‐up study (LEGACY). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:2159‐2169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Pak HN, Hwang C, Lim HE, Kim JW, Lee HS, Kim YH. Electroanatomic characteristics of atrial premature beats triggering atrial fibrillation in patients with persistent versus paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006;17:818‐824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:e275‐e444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2893‐2962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Guerra F, Brambatti M, Nieuwlaat R, et al. Symptomatic atrial fibrillation and risk of cardiovascular events: data from the Euro Heart Survey. Europace. 2017;19:1922‐1929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Piccini JP, Passman R, Turakhia M, Connolly AT, Nabutovsky Y, Varma N. Atrial fibrillation burden, progression, and the risk of death: a case‐crossover analysis in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Europace. 2019;21:404‐413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Polovina M, Hindricks G, Maggioni A, et al. Association of metabolic syndrome with non‐thromboembolic adverse cardiac outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:4030‐4039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting information