Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 26;26(1):36–51. doi: 10.1002/dys.1645

Table 1.

Studies included in the meta‐analysis, presented in order of increasing magnitude of effect‐size (Hedges g); and related descriptive statistics

g SE Variance Lower, upper limit Z p
1 Papadopoulos et al. (2012)a −0.27 0.31 0.10 −0.88, 0.34 −0.86 .39
2 Santurette et al. (2010) 0.18 0.25 0.06 −0.31, 0.68 0.74 .46
3 Wijnen, Kappers, Vlutters, and Winkel (2012) 0.35 0.24 0.06 −0.11, 0.81 1.51 .13
4 Papadopoulos et al. (2012)b 0.36 0.26 0.07 −0.16, 0.87 1.35 .18
5 Georgiou, Protopapas, Papadopoulos, Skaloumbakas, and Parrila (2010) 0.37 0.30 0.09 −0.22, 0.96 1.22 .22
6 Walker, Shinn, Cranford, Givens, and Holbert (2002) 0.50 0.38 0.15 −0.25, 1.25 1.3 .19
7 Papadopoulos et al. (2012)c 0.53 0.33 0.11 −0.12, 1.18 1.60 .11
8 Amitay, Ben‐Yehudah, Banai, and Ahissar (2002) 0.54 0.28 0.08 −0.02, 1.10 1.90 .06
9 Watson and Miller (1993) 0.56 0.25 0.06 0.07, 1.10 2.26 .024
10 Banai and Ahissar (2004) 0.60 0.20 0.04 0.21, 1.00 3.02 .002
11 Thomson and Goswami (2008) 0.63 0.29 0.08 0.06, 1.20 2.17 .03
12 Ahissar, Lubin, Putter‐Katz, and Banai (2006) 0.65 0.33 0.11 0.00, 1.29 1.97 .049
13 Amitay, Ben‐Yehudah, et al. (2002) 0.65 0.23 0.05 0.20, 1.10 2.83 .005
14 Heath et al. (2006) 0.68 0.22 0.05 0.25, 1.10 3.11 .002
15 Hill, Bailey, Griffiths, and Snowling (1999) 0.68 0.35 0.12 −0.01, 1.37 1.94 .052
16 Ahissar et al. (2000) 0.70 0.34 0.11 0.04, 1.36 2.07 .038
17 Banai and Ahissar (2006)d 0.74 0.28 0.08 0.19, 1.28 2.66 .008
18 Gibson, Hogben, and Fletcher (2006) 0.76 0.22 0.05 0.33, 1.19 3.48 <.001
29 Halliday and Bishop (2006) 0.77 0.24 0.06 0.30, 1.23 3.24 .001
30 Banai and Ahissar (2006)e 0.82 0.32 0.10 0.19, 1.45 2.55 .011
21 Oganian and Ahissar (2012) 0.82 0.18 0.03 0.48, 1.17 4.69 <.001
22 Ben‐Yehudah and Ahissar (2004) 0.84 0.25 0.06 0.35, 1.34 3.33 .001
23 Wang, Huss, Hamailainen, and Goswami (2012) 0.85 0.21 0.05 0.43, 1.27 3.95 <.001
24 McArthur, Ellis, Atkinson, and Coltheart (2008) 0.96 0.21 0.05 0.54, 1.38 4.50 <.001
25 Goswami et al. (2010)f 1.01 0.28 0.08 0.46, 1.56 3.57 <.001
26 McAnally and Stein (1996) 1.04 0.3 0.09 0.45, 1.63 3.47 .001
27 Ben‐Yehudah, Banai, & Ahissar (2004) 1.16 0.30 0.09 0.57, 1.74 3.87 <.001
28 Goswami et al. (2010)g 2.12 0.3 0.09 1.53, 2.71 7.06 <.001
29 Hari et al. (1999) 2.45 0.46 0.21 1.55, 3.35 5.32 <0.001
30 Cacace, McFarland, Ouimet, Schrieber, and Marro (2000) 3.03 0.79 0.62 1.48, 4.57 3.83 <.001
Mean 0.76 0.80 0.01 0.60, 0.91 9.49 <.001

Notes: See Section 3 for exclusion criteria; three papers are included in the table more than once, because they contained more than one sample. Results are rounded to two decimal places; alpha values (p) to three decimal places.

a

Grade 6 sample.

b

Grade 4 sample.

c

Grade 2 sample.

d

7th grade sample.

e

8th grade sample.

f

Chinese language sample.

g

English language sample.