Abstract
Problem
Markers of maternal inflammation may determine infant birth outcomes.
Method of Study
Maternal serum samples were collected at 28 weeks gestation (n=1418) in the Seychelles Child Development Study Nutrition Cohort 2 and analyzed for immune markers by MSD multiplex assay, including cytokines from the Th1 (IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-2 and TNF-α) and Th2 (IL-4, IL-5, IL-10) subsets, with IL-6, MCP-1, TARC, sFlt-1 and VEGF-D. Associations of log-transformed immune markers with birthweight, length, head circumference and gestational age were assessed by multiple linear regression models, which were adjusted for maternal age, BMI, parity, child sex, gestational age and socioeconomic status.
Results
Neither total Th1, Th2 nor Th1:Th2 were significantly associated with any birth outcome. However, the angiogenesis marker VEGF-D was predictive of a lower birthweight, (β= −0.058, P=0.017) and birth length (β=−0.088, P=0.001) after adjusting for covariates. Higher concentrations of CRP were predictive of a lower birthweight (β=−0.057, P=0.023) and IL-2 (β=0.073, P=0.009) and the chemokine MCP-1 (β=0.067, P=0.016) were predictive of a longer gestational age.
Conclusions
In our cohort of healthy pregnant women, we found no evidence for associations between the Th1 or Th2 inflammatory markers with birth outcomes. However, VEGF-D and CRP appear to predict lower birthweight and IL-2 and MCP-1 a longer gestation. Greater understanding is required of the variation in these immune markers at different gestational stages, as well as the factors which may regulate their balance in healthy pregnancy.
n=233
Keywords: Inflammation, Pregnancy, Birth Outcomes, Cytokines, Seychelles Child Development Study
Introduction
During healthy pregnancy, the immune system adapts to protect both the mother and fetus. The CD4+ T cells, involved in the T helper type 1 (Th1) mediated response, secrete inflammatory cytokines, including the pro-inflammatory IFN-γ and TNF-α, which promote host defence against intracellular viral and bacterial pathogens. Cytokines (IL-4, IL-5 and IL-10) derived from the T helper type 2 cells (Th2) tend to be less pro-inflammatory and are important for antibody-mediated defence against large extracellular pathogens and allergic responses (Sykes et al, 2012). The Th1:Th2 ratio is often used to characterize dominating cytokine patterns. The first trimester of pregnancy is believed to be predominantly a Th1 phase as implantation occurs triggering the innate immune system to stimulate monocyte release and a number of other cells (Saito et al, 1999; Mor and Cardenas, 2010; Sacks et al 1999). This response is followed by an anti-inflammatory immunological phase where there is bias towards Th2 cytokine production and down-regulation of Th1 cytokines (Mor and Cardenas, 2010). The immune response returns to a Th1 phase in late pregnancy, promoting contraction of the uterus and initiation of labour (Mor et al, 2011).
Evidence suggests that the maternal inflammatory cytokine profile and resulting Th1:Th2 balance is important for successful pregnancy and birth outcomes (Cappelletti et al, 2016). Studies have reported higher third trimester concentrations of Th1 cytokines in cases of miscarriage and pre-eclampsia than in healthy term pregnancies (Halonen et al, 2009). Similarly, greater maternal concentrations of Th1 cytokines in early pregnancy have been associated with preterm birth and lower birthweight and length (Wilkinson et al, 2017). Any factor with the potential to shift the Th1:Th2 balance in favour of Th1, such as hormonal changes, pathogens or environmental stimuli, may increase susceptibility to inflammatory conditions and adversely affect pregnancy outcomes (Challis et al. 2009; Robinson & Klein, 2012). Other immune cells are active at the maternal-fetal interface, including chemokines and angiogenesis markers, and together promote fetal tolerance and the maintenance of normal pregnancy (Du et al, 2014). Understanding more on how the maternal immune response might influence fetal growth might help prevent adverse fetal growth outcomes. There remains very limited data from human studies on concentrations of immune markers in healthy pregnancy and even less on their potential impact on fetal growth. In the present study, we characterized an extensive panel of immune markers in 28 weeks gestational blood samples with the aim of investigating relationships between maternal inflammation and birth outcomes including weight, length, head circumference and gestational age.
Materials and Methods
Study Population
Nutrition Cohort 2 (NC2) is part of the Seychelles Child Development Study, a multi-cohort observational study with the overall aim of investigating associations between prenatal methylmercury (MeHg) exposure and child neurodevelopment. NC2 was conducted on Mahé, the main island of the Republic of Seychelles, where mothers were recruited during their first antenatal visit (from 14 weeks gestation) at eight health centres between 2008 and 2011. Inclusion criteria for NC2 included being native Seychellois, being =>16 y of age, having a singleton pregnancy, and with no obvious health concerns (Strain et al, 2015). The study was reviewed and approved by the Seychelles Ethics Board and the Research Subjects Review Board at the University of Rochester.
Inflammatory Markers
Non-fasting blood samples were drawn from mothers at approximately 28 weeks gestation and analyzed for inflammatory markers as previously described (Irwin et al, 2019). Cytokines that were measured for cell-mediated inflammatory responses (Th1) include interleukin (IL)-1β, interleukin (IL)-2, interferon-gamma (IFN γ), and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α). The cytokines associated with humoral response (Th2) included IL-4, IL-5 and IL-10. In addition, we measured IL-6, which plays a dual role in both Th1 and Th2 cell differentiation (Dielh & Rincon, 2002). We measured two pregnancy-associated chemokines, monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) and thymus activated regulated chemokine (TARC) and two angiogenesis markers noted to be important for maintenance of placental vascular development and blood flow, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) and a member of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family, VEGF-D. All markers were analyzed as continuous variables in pg/mL, with CRP measured in mg/L.
Birth Outcomes
Birthweight (g), length (cm) and head circumference (cm) were assessed at birth by trained nurses to the nearest two decimal places using routine clinical procedures and standardized scales. For descriptive purposes, we calculated sex-specific percentiles of birthweight for gestational age by using US national reference data (Oken et al, 2003). We defined small-for-gestational age (SGA) as birthweight for gestational age and sex below the 10th percentile and large-for-gestational age (LGA) as above the 90th percentile. Those within the 10th and 90th percentiles were classed as appropriate-for-gestational age (AGA).
Covariates
Mothers reported information about their age, parity, smoking status and alcohol use at enrolment to the study using questionnaires administered by trained nurses. Child sex was recorded at birth along with birth outcome data. When their infant was approximately 20 months of age Hollingshead socioeconomic status (SES) was assessed using a modified index relevant to the Republic of Seychelles (Davidson et al, 1998). We combined occupational and educational codes as previously described into a continuous SES score (Davidson et al, 1998). Height and weight of the mothers were obtained from which their postnatal BMI was calculated (BMI = weight (kg)/ height (m)2). We adjusted for BMI, as measured at 20 months postnatally, based on data from our previous study showing a high correlation between BMI assessed in early pregnancy and postnatal BMI (Davidson et al, 2008). Gestational age (weeks) was recorded at delivery.
Statistical Analysis
From our final database (n=1536), we excluded mother-child pairs where mothers were <16 years of age (n=1), did not give consent (n=1), had gestational problems (n=3), where the infant was deceased at birth (n=5), was classed as a preterm birth (born ≤ 34 weeks; n=19), a twin birth (n=34), or had a birthweight <1500g (n=2) and those missing all inflammatory and/or birth outcome data (n=49). Two mothers were removed with extremely high concentrations of all inflammatory markers indicating possible illness. Two mothers were removed with questionable dates of gestational week at blood collection and seven infants with questionable head circumference measurements at birth were removed (>38cm), leaving n= 1411 mother-child pairs for analysis. For our analysis, we summed cytokines to determine the Th1:Th2 ratio as follows: Th1-type cells: IL-1 β + IL-2 + IFN- γ + TNF-α and Th2-cells: IL-4 + IL-5 + IL-10. We analyzed the remaining markers individually: CRP, IL-6, MCP-1, TARC, sFlt-1 and VEGF-D. Distributions of maternal and child characteristics were first examined, followed by Pearson’s correlations to examine bivariate associations of each covariate with birth outcomes. One-way ANOVA was used to compare concentrations of immune markers between mothers whose infants were classified as either SGA, AGA or LGA. We conducted multiple linear regression models by evaluating each maternal inflammatory marker as continuous data, both individually as well as the Th1 and Th2 sums and the Th1:Th2 ratio. For each marker, we ran main effects models both with and without adjustment for the covariates known to be associated with birth outcomes (child sex (M/F), maternal age at enrolment, gestational age, parity, SES and maternal BMI). We also examined gestational age as a birth outcome in itself and in this model, we adjusted for child sex, maternal age, parity, SES and maternal BMI. We added a constant of +1 to all inflammatory marker data, including Th1, Th2 and Th1:Th2, prior to log-transformation. Undetectable immune marker data are common in multiplex assays; however the Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) Platform is extremely sensitive and as such, ≥80% of concentrations were above the LLOD for most markers. For undetectable values we inputted LLOD/√2 as described by others (Ogden, 2010). The lowest rates of detection were observed for IL-2 and IL-4 where only 36% of all samples were above the LLOD. Excluding these markers from Th1, Th2 and Th1:Th2 variables did little to impact the relationships with birth outcomes. Therefore, we included these markers both as individual variables and within the Th1 and Th2 variables.
Results
Table 1 shows the descriptive characteristics of mothers and infants. Among the 1411 mothers with available data, there were n=734 male and n=677 female children. The mean ± SD age of the mothers at enrolment to the study was 27 ± 6 years, with a gestational age of 39 ± 1 weeks. Calculating sex-specific percentiles of birthweight for gestational age classified the majority (n=1101, 78%) of infants in the cohort as AGA (10–90th percentile) based on US reference data (Oken et al, 2003). When we compared immune markers between mothers according to percentile of birthweight for gestational age, there were no significant differences in maternal concentrations of any inflammatory marker among these categories. Table 2 reports the unlogged immune marker concentrations for the 1411 mothers with complete data showing the assay performance data. The median (25th, 75th percentiles) Th1 and Th2 sums were 9.67 (5.75, 14.75) and 2.14 (1.04, 3.31) pg/mL, with a median Th1:Th2 ratio of 5.16 (3.04, 8.48). Pearson correlation analysis showed maternal age, BMI, parity, child sex (being male) and gestational age to each be significantly correlated with a greater birthweight, length and head circumference (P<0.01) (Table 3).
Table 1.
Descriptive characteristics of the NC2 mother-child cohort
n | Frequency n (%) | Mean | SD | Median | 25th | 75th | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maternal age (yrs) | 1410 | 26.88 | 6.28 | 25.92 | 21.96 | 31.35 | |
Height (cm) | 1312 | 161.91 | 6.07 | 162.00 | 158.00 | 166.00 | |
Weight (kg) | 1301 | 70.64 | 17.90 | 67.90 | 57.15 | 81.35 | |
BMI (kg/m2) | 1301 | 26.93 | 6.54 | 26.15 | 21.82 | 30.93 | |
Smoker during pregnancy | 1411 | 12 (0.9) | |||||
Alcohol use during pregnancy | 1411 | 60 (4.3) | |||||
Gestational diabetes | 1411 | 6 (0.4) | |||||
Hollingshead SES | 1364 | 32.01 | 10.38 | 31.50 | 24.00 | 39.50 | |
Parity | 1396 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
Gestational age (wks) | 1399 | 39.06 | 1.39 | 39.00 | 38.00 | 40.00 | |
Gestational age at blood collection | 1379 | 27.90 | 1.14 | 27.86 | 27.43 | 28.43 | |
Head circumference (cm) | 1385 | 33.76 | 1.52 | 34.00 | 33.00 | 35.00 | |
Birth length (cm) | 1385 | 51.12 | 3.19 | 51.00 | 49.00 | 53.00 | |
Birth weight (kg) | 1409 | 3.19 | 0.46 | 3.20 | 2.89 | 3.49 | |
Small for Gestational Age (SGA) | 1396 | 249 (17.6) | |||||
Appropriate for Gestational Age (AGA) | 1396 | 1101 (78) | |||||
Large for Gestational Age (LGA) | 1396 | 46 (3.3) | |||||
Female infant | 1411 | 677 (48) |
Table 2.
Maternal serum inflammatory concentrations (pg/ml)
n | Assay LLOD | Detectable above LLOD (% total assayed) | Mean | SD | Median | 25th | 75th | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFN-γ | 1411 | 0.20 | 84.4 | 5.54 | 18.98 | 2.77 | 0.99 | 4.93 |
IL-1β | 1411 | 0.04 | 82.6 | 0.32 | 0.62 | 0.19 | 0.03 | 0.39 |
IL-2 | 1411 | 0.09 | 36.1 | 0.28 | 0.58 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.23 |
IL-4 | 1411 | 0.02 | 35.5 | 0.14 | 0.54 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
IL-6 | 1411 | 0.06 | 88.7 | 0.99 | 1.61 | 0.52 | 0.22 | 1.12 |
IL-10 | 1411 | 0.03 | 90.6 | 1.55 | 7.21 | 0.89 | 0.24 | 1.67 |
TNF-α | 1411 | 0.04 | 100 | 7.15 | 7.15 | 6.10 | 3.47 | 8.87 |
IL-5 | 1411 | 0.22 | 100 | 1.33 | 2.15 | 0.80 | 0.38 | 1.46 |
MCP-1 | 1411 | 0.09 | 100 | 74.20 | 86.59 | 59.66 | 42.90 | 86.04 |
TARC | 1411 | 0.22 | 100 | 101.36 | 143.05 | 77.62 | 46.71 | 120.58 |
sFlt-1 | 1411 | 0.56 | 100 | 2056.99 | 1222.29 | 1778.93 | 1224.07 | 2523.61 |
VEGF-D | 1411 | 2.53 | 100 | 737.46 | 369.45 | 659.24 | 484.94 | 907.59 |
CRP (mg/L) | 1411 | 1.00 | 98.9 | 3.52 | 2.71 | 2.71 | 1.40 | 4.89 |
Th1 | 1411 | 13.28 | 21.20 | 9.67 | 5.75 | 14.75 | ||
Th2 | 1411 | 3.02 | 7.60 | 2.14 | 1.04 | 3.31 | ||
Th1:Th2 | 1411 | 8.23 | 12.63 | 5.16 | 3.04 | 8.48 | ||
Data are unlogged |
Table 3.
Correlations between covariates and birth outcomes
Birth weight | Birth length | Head circumference | Gestational Age | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
r | P | r | P | r | P | r | P | |
Maternal age (yrs) | 0.090 | 0.001 | 0.150 | <0.001 | 0.048 | 0.076 | −0.005 | 0.838 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 0.135 | <0.001 | 0.129 | <0.001 | 0.078 | <0.001 | 0.067 | 0.017 |
Hollingshead SES | 0.038 | 0.166 | 0.043 | 0.114 | 0.020 | 0.467 | −0.012 | 0.656 |
Parity | 0.082 | 0.002 | 0.132 | <0.001 | 0.044 | 0.107 | −0.018 | 0.501 |
Child sex | 0.125 | <0.001 | 0.109 | <0.001 | 0.095 | <0.001 | −0.008 | 0.753 |
Gestational age (wks) | 0.484 | <0.001 | 0.363 | <0.001 | 0.352 | <0.001 | ||
Significant correlations are bolded P<0.05 |
Table 4 presents the results of linear regression models for log-transformed inflammatory marker data with adjustment for covariates. Cytokines grouped as Th1, Th2 or Th1:Th2 did not significantly predict any birth outcome. Increasing concentrations of maternal VEGF-D (β=−0.058, P=0.017) and CRP (β=−0.059, P=0.02) were significantly associated with a lower birthweight, when adjusted for covariates. Maternal VEGF-D was also predictive of a shorter birth length (β= −0.089, P=0.001). Increasing concentrations of maternal IL-2 and MCP-1 were predictive of a longer gestational age (adjusted model β=0.073, P=0.009 and β=0.069, P=0.013). In the unadjusted model, IL-10 was significantly associated with a shorter birth length (β=−0.054, P=0.044) and gestational age (β= −0.054, P=0.044) (data not shown). There was a trend for the association between IL-10 and gestational age to remain following adjustment for covariates (β=−0.049, P=0.079).
Table 4.
Associations between maternal serum inflammatory markers and birth outcomes: Adjusted models1
Birth weight (kg)1 | Birth length (cm)1 | Head circumference (cm)1 | Gestational Age2 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
95% CI | β | P | 95% CI | β | P | 95% CI | β | P | 95% CI | β | P | |
IFN-γ | −0.039,0.012 | −0.026 | 0.288 | −0.240, 0.144 | −0.013 | 0.626 | −0.052, 0.129 | 0.022 | 0.402 | −0.071, 0.104 | 0.010 | 0.708 |
IL-1β | −0.084, 0.087 | 0.001 | 0.971 | −0.691, 0.601 | −0.004 | 0.892 | −0.164, 0.446 | 0.023 | 0.365 | −0.265, 0.326 | 0.006 | 0.841 |
IL-2 | −0.077, 0.082 | 0.001 | 0.955 | −0.393, 0.805 | 0.018 | 0.500 | −0.116, 0.446 | 0.030 | 0.248 | 0.091, 0.635 | 0.073 | 0.009 |
IL-4 | −0.184, 0.017 | −0.039 | 0.103 | −0.923, 0.688 | −0.008 | 0.775 | −0.315, 0.442 | 0.008 | 0.743 | −0.186, 0.508 | 0.025 | 0.363 |
IL-6 | −0.034, 0.062 | 0.014 | 0.557 | −0.296, 0.435 | 0.010 | 0.708 | −0.067, 0.276 | 0.031 | 0.232 | −0.175, 0.156 | −0.003 | 0.912 |
IL-10 | −0.050, 0.029 | −0.012 | 0.614 | −0.537, 0.062 | −0.041 | 0.121 | −0.154, 0.129 | −0.004 | 0.862 | −0.259, 0.014 | −0.049 | 0.079 |
TNF-α | −0.039, 0.037 | −0.002 | 0.947 | −0.195, 0.378 | 0.017 | 0.530 | −0.059, 0.210 | 0.029 | 0.270 | −0.225, 0.037 | −0.039 | 0.160 |
IL-5 | −0.087, 0.003 | −0.045 | 0.067 | −0.307, 0.373 | 0.005 | 0.848 | −0.209, 0.11 | −0.016 | 0.546 | −0.090, 0.220 | 0.023 | 0.411 |
MCP-1 | −0.020, 0.026 | 0.006 | 0.797 | −0.059, 0.290 | 0.034 | 0.194 | −0.122, 0.043 | −0.024 | 0.349 | 0.021, 0.220 | 0.069 | 0.013 |
TARC | −0.030, 0.012 | −0.020 | 0.403 | −0.134, 0.179 | 0.008 | 0.776 | −0.141, 0.007 | −0.046 | 0.074 | −0.032, 0.111 | 0.030 | 0.281 |
sFlt-1 | −0.031, 0.052 | 0.012 | 0.617 | −0.180, 0.448 | 0.023 | 0.403 | −0.240, 0.055 | −0.033 | 0.219 | −0.229, 0.058 | −0.034 | 0.244 |
VEGF-D | −0.101, −0.010 | −0.058 | 0.017 | −0.927, −0.243 | −0.089 | 0.001 | −0.314, 0.009 | −0.049 | 0.063 | −0.063, 0.250 | 0.033 | 0.241 |
CRP | −0.083, −0.007 | −0.059 | 0.020 | −0.285, 0.292 | 0.001 | 0.981 | −0.227, 0.044 | −0.036 | 0.186 | −0.110, 0.153 | 0.009 | 0.750 |
Th1 | −0.041, 0.024 | −0.012 | 0.620 | −0.213, 0.277 | 0.007 | 0.798 | −0.050, 0.180 | 0.029 | 0.268 | −0.132, 0.092 | −0.010 | 0.731 |
Th2 | −0.065, 0.009 | −0.036 | 0.136 | −0.384, 0.173 | −0.020 | 0.457 | −0.156, 0.106 | −0.010 | 0.710 | −0.167, 0.087 | −0.017 | 0.525 |
Th1:Th2 | −0.015, 0.045 | 0.023 | 0.338 | −0.184, 0.269 | 0.010 | 0.714 | −0.062, 0.151 | 0.021 | 0.413 | −0.074, 0.133 | 0.016 | 0.572 |
All inflammatory markers were logged after adding a constant to all +1
Models are adjusted for child sex, maternal age, gestational age, SES, parity and maternal BMI;
Model adjusted for child sex, maternal age, SES, parity and maternal BMI
Significant results are bolded P<0.05
Discussion
In our cohort of healthy Seychellois mothers, we found no consistent evidence that maternal markers of inflammation, grouped as the Th1, Th2 or the Th1:Th2 ratio, at 28 weeks gestation were associated with infant birth outcomes. We found that maternal CRP, an acute-phase inflammatory protein indicating an immune response to infection or antigen, was associated with a lower birthweight after adjusting for common confounders. This finding is in agreement with other studies that have measured CRP in each trimester and found it to be associated with a lower birthweight (Ernst et al 2011; Ali et al 2015; Retnakaran et al 2012; de Oliveira et al, 2017), and preterm birth (Amarilyo et al, 2010). One possible mechanism for the role of prenatal inflammation in determining infant birth outcomes is that infiltration of inflammatory cells to the maternal-fetal tissues can generate vascular dysfunction, which compromises placental blood supply and in turn, affects fetal growth (de Oliveira et al, 2017). Birthweight is a known predictor of child morbidity and mortality and being born SGA increases the risk of neonatal complications and lower cognitive development (McCormick et al, 1996; Pryor et al, 1995). Although CRP is recognized to increase gradually throughout pregnancy in approaching labor, it is suggested that prolonged excessive concentrations at any stage of gestation may be associated with adverse birth outcomes (de Oliveira et al, 2015). However, serum CRP is a nonspecific marker of inflammation in the body, which does not identify the stimulus for its elevation and therefore cannot inform as to the site of inflammation (Hackney et al, 2008). It is possible that elevated CRP in the mother at 28 weeks gestation may not directly restrict fetal growth, but its elevation may be in response to unidentified damaged tissue, nuclear antigens or pathogenic organisms. In our study all mothers’ CRP concentrations were <10mg/L, which is considered normal and not indicative of acute inflammation (WHO, 2014).
In conjunction with this finding, we found that increased maternal concentrations of the angiogenic growth factor VEGF-D were associated with a lower birthweight and birth length, with a trend for a lower head circumference. The VEGF family plays a role in the early development of the placental-fetal circulatory system, while the VEGF-D isoform is predominantly a lymphangiogenic growth factor (Shibuya, 2013). A splice variant of the VEGF receptor 1, fms-like tyrosine-kinase receptor (FLT-1), soluble FLT-1 (sFlt-1) has anti-angiogenic properties. An imbalance in maternal angiogenic factors, with excess sFlt-1 and decreased VEGF, has been associated with restricted fetal growth and together, these markers may play a pathological role in pre-eclampsia (Wang et al, 2009; Shange et al, 2017). A number of studies have reported, contrary to our finding, that maternal serum VEGF concentrations are positively correlated with birthweight (Wheeler et al, 1999; Rosso et al, 1993), including one study which found cord VEGF to be positively correlated, and sFlt-1 negatively correlated with birthweight (Voller et al, 2014). However, the literature remains controversial with regards the associations of individual VEGF isoforms at different stages of pregnancy with birth outcomes (Andraweera et al, 2012). The location of VEGF expression varies throughout gestation with VEGF-D mainly expressed in the trophoblasts, decidual stromal cells, endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells (Schiessi et al, 2009). The majority of evidence suggests that VEGF-D is upregulated in early embryonic development, but less is known about concentrations in later pregnancy. However, angiogenesis is believed to switch from branching to non-branching from 25 weeks gestation onwards and this is accompanied by an increase in sFlt-1 and a decrease of VEGF-A (Andraweera et al, 2012). Given that sFlt-1 is an agonist of VEGF, these findings might suggest that VEGF-D is downregulated in later pregnancy and subsequently, that elevated concentrations might be undesirable. Measuring the other family of VEGF markers, VEGF-A, and VEGF-C, might be necessary to understand our finding.
We found MCP-1 and IL-2 to be associated with a longer gestational age. IL-2 is essential for activation and function of the regulatory T cells (Treg) which play a key role in sustaining fetal tolerance and preventing abnormal immune response in pregnancy (Alijotas-Reig et al, 2014; Chinen et al, 2016). MCP-1 is a chemokine which regulates trophoblast activation and growth of the placenta. Downregulation of MCP-1 is implicated in abnormal fetal growth, with lower maternal and fetal concentrations found in cases of intra-uterine growth restriction (IUGR) (Briana et al, 2007). The association of both of these markers with a longer gestational duration is positive and may suggest that these cytokines have actions that could prevent early parturition, perhaps through regulatory effects on the chemotaxis of other immune cells.
The immune response in pregnancy is a state of careful balance between immune cells to reduce the risk of fetal rejection and increase the transfer of maternal antibodies to the fetus (Robinson & Klein, 2012; Mor et al, 2011). It is generally believed that the balance of Th1 to Th2 cytokines is in preference of the more pro-inflammatory Th1 cells in early gestation, shifting in the second trimester to a more Th2-dominant response, until labor when the balance shifts in favour of Th1 once more (Chen et al, 2012). Elevated Th1 cells in pregnancy have been associated with pre-eclampsia and adverse birth outcomes (Saito et al, 1999; Cappelletti et al, 2016). In this study, we found no evidence that maternal Th1:Th2 ratio is associated with infant birth outcomes. It is important to recognize that our cohort differs to other populations in relation to their high fish consumption and intake of long chain n-3 PUFA, which could affect the inflammatory state as previously discussed (Strain et al, 2015). Adding further to the complexity of immune adaptations taking place in pregnancy is the balance between chemokines and angiogenesis factors, which are not well understood. Our results showing VEGF-D to be associated with a lower birthweight and length may be explained by endothelial dysfunction, rather than inflammation. It is also important to recognize that the Th1:Th2 paradigm has been challenged in recent years, with knowledge that additional regulatory mechanisms involving Treg cells are just as important for successful pregnancy (Guerin et al, 2009), and thus adding a further element of complexity to this area.
A strength of our research is that we examined a broad spectrum of immune markers by sensitive assay approach. Th1:Th2 ratios found in our study at 28 weeks were similar to ratios reported for healthy pregnant women in the third trimester by Saito et al (1999), who used flow cytometry to quantify Th1 and Th2 cells. However, our data is limited to one time point in pregnancy and we lack information on the participants’ general health and possible presence of infection at the time of blood collection, which could have aided interpretation of our results. De Oliveira et al (2017) have suggested that inflammatory markers are simply mediators of the duration of pregnancy and may be predictive of preterm labor. However, in our cohort we excluded preterm births and adjusted for gestational age in our birthweight model. The majority of infants were classed as being an appropriate birthweight for gestational age (AGA) and to the best of our knowledge, mothers were healthy with only 6 cases of gestational diabetes in our cohort and with no known cases of preeclampsia.
Finally, it is possible that the cytokines measured in maternal serum do not closely reflect what is occurring at the maternal-fetal interface (Lin et al, 1993). Therefore, future studies should consider measurement of these markers in neonatal blood to help enhance understanding on the mechanisms of these associations with birth outcomes.
Conclusion
Maternal inflammation is a known risk factor for poorer birth outcomes and preterm birth, yet the mechanisms underlying these relationships are complex. Our results from the SCDS NC2 cohort of healthy mothers and children suggest that there are no associations between Th1 and Th2 cytokines at 28 weeks gestation, and birth outcomes. However, CRP and VEGF-D appear to be independent predictors of lower birthweight and length, and MCP-1 and IL-2, of a longer gestational age. The mechanisms underlying these associations warrant further investigation, including studies of these markers at different gestational stages and in cord blood.
Highlights.
Maternal inflammatory markers, as characterized by the Th1, Th2 and Th1:Th2 ratio at 28 weeks gestation, were not associated with infant birthweight, birth length or head circumference.
Higher concentrations of the pro- lymphangiogenic vascular endothelial growth factor D (VEGF-D) appear to be predictive of a lower birthweight and length.
Similarly, greater concentrations of C-Reactive Protein (CRP), which is a pro-inflammatory marker, were associated with a lower birthweight.
A longer gestational age were predicted by higher concentrations of pro-inflammatory chemokine monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) and interleukin 2 (IL-2).
Further research is required to aid understanding of the importance of these findings.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by grants R01-ES010219, P30-ES01247, and T32-ES007271 from the United States National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (National Institutes of Health) and in-kind by the Government of the Republic of Seychelles. The study sponsors had no role in the design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication. The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Declaration of interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
- 1.Ali Z, Bokhari FA, Zaki S et al. (2015) Correlation of CRP levels in third trimester with fetal birth weight in preeclamptic and normotensive pregnant women. J Coll Phys Surgeons Pakistan 25 (2), 111–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Alijotas-Reig J, Llurba E & Gris JM (2014) Potentiating maternal immune tolerance in pregnancy: A new challenging role for regulatory T cells. Placenta 35, 241–248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Andraweera PH, Dekker GA & Roberts CT (2012) The vascular endothelial growth factor family in adverse pregnancy outcomes. Human Reprod Update 18 (4), 436–457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Amarilyo G, Oren A, Mimouni FB et al. (2010) Increased cord serum inflammatory markers in small-for-gestational age neonates. J Perinatol 1–3 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 5.Briana DD, Boutsikou M, Baka S et al. (2007) Perinatal plasma monocyte chemotactic protein-1 concentrations in intrauterine growth restriction. Med Inflamm 2007, 65032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cappelletti M, Bella SD, Ferrazzi E, et al. (2016). Inflammation and preterm birth. J Leukocyte Biology 99, 67–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Challis JR, Lockwood CJ, Myatt JE et al. (2009) Inflammation and pregnancy. Reprod Sci 16 (2), 206–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chen S, Liu Y & Sytwu H (2012) Immunologic regulation in pregnancy: from mechanism to therapeutic strategy for immunomodulation. Clin Devel Immunol 2012, 258391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chinen T, Kannan AK, Levine AG et al. (2016) An essential role for IL-2 receptor in regulatory T cell function. Nat Immunol 17 (911), 1322–1333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Davidson PW, Myers GJ, Cox C et al. (1998) Effects of Prenatal and Postnatal Methylmercury Exposure from Fish Consumption at 66 months of Age: The Seychelles Child Development Study. JAMA 280: 701–707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Davidson PW, Strain JJ, Myers GJ et al. (2008) Neurodevelopmental effects of maternal nutritional status and exposure to methylmercury from eating fish during pregnancy. Neurotoxicol 29, 767–775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.De Oliveira LC, Franco-Sena AB, Farias DR et al. (2015) Factors associated with maternal serum C-reactive protein throughout pregnancy: A longitudinal study in women of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Nutrition 31 (9), 1103–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.De Oliveira LC, Franco-Sena AB, Farias DR et al. (2017) Maternal C-reactive protein concentrations during pregnancy and birth weight in a prospective cohort in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 30 (19), 2346–2353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Diehl S & Rincon M (2002) The two faces of IL-6 on Th1/Th2 differentiation. Molec Immunol 39, 531–536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Du M-R, Wang S-C & Li D-J (2014) The integrative roles of chemokines at the maternal-fetal interface in early pregnancy. Cell Mol Immunol 11, 438–448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ernst GDS, De Jonge LL, Hofman A et al. (2011) C-reactive protein levels in early pregnancy, fetal growth patterns and the risks for neonatal complications: the Generation R Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205, 132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fu Q, Zhu J & Van Eyk JE (2010) Comparison of multiplex immunoassay platforms. Clin Chem 56 (2), 314–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Guerin LR, Prins JR & Robertson SA (2009) Regulatory T-cells and immune tolerance in pregnancy: a new target for infertility treatment? Human Reprod Update 15 (5), 517–535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hackney DN, Macpherson TA, Dunigan JT & Simhan HN (2008) First trimester maternal plasma concentrations of C-reactive protein in low risk patients and subsequent development of chorioamnionitis. Am J Perinatal 25 (7), 407–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Halonen M, Lohman IC, Stern DA et al. (2009). Th1/Th2 Patterns and Balance in Cytokine Production in the Parents and Infants of a Large Birth Cohort. J Immunology 182 (5), 3285–3293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Irwin JL, McSorley EM, Yeates AJ et al. (2019) Maternal immune markers during pregnancy and child neurodevelopmental outcomes at age 20 months in the Seychelles Child Development Study. J Neuroimmunol 335 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2019.577023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lin H, Mosmann TR, Guilbert L et al. (1993) Synthesis of T helper 2 type cytokines at the maternal-fetal interface. J Immunol 151, 4562–1573. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.McCormick MC, Workman-Daniels K & Brooks-Gunn J (1996) The behavioural and emotional well-being of school-age children with different birth weights. Pediatrics 97 (1), 18–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mor G & Cardenas I (2010). The Immune System in Pregnancy: A Unique Complexity. Am J Reproductive Immunology 63 (6), 425–433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mor G, Cardenas I, Abrahams V, & Guller S. (2011). Inflammation and pregnancy: the role of the immune system at the implantation site. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1221 (1), 80–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ogden TL (2010) Handling results below the level of detection. Ann Occup Hyg 54 (3), 255–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Oken E, Kleinman KP, Rich-Edwards J & Gillman MW (2003) A nearly continuous measure of birth weight for gestational age using a United States national reference. BMC Pediatrics 3, 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pryor J, Silva PA & Brooke M (1995) Growth, development and behaviour in adolescents born small-for-gestational–age. J Pediatrics & Child Health 31 (5), 403–407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Retnakaran R, Ye C, Hanley AJ et al. (2012) Effect of maternal weight, adipokines, glucose tolerance and lipids on infant birth weight among women without gestational diabetes mellitus. CMAJ 184 (12), 1353–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Robinson KP & Klein SL (2012) Pregnancy and pregnancy-associated hormones alter immune responses and disease pathogenesis. Hormones and Behavior 62, 263–271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rosso P, Donoso E, Braun S et al. (1993) Maternal hemodynamic adjustments in idiopathic fetal growth retardation. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest 35, 162–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sacks G, Sargent I & Redman C (1999) An innate view of human pregnancy. Immunol Today 20 (3), 114–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Saito S, Sakai M, Sasaki Y et al. (1999) Quantitative analysis of peripheral blood Th0, Th1, Th2 and the Th1:Th2 cell ratio during normal human pregnancy and preeclampsia. Clin Exp Immunol 117, 550–555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schiessi B, Innes BA, Bulmer JN et al. (2009) Localization of angiogenic growth factors and their receptors in the human placental bed throughout normal human pregnancy. Placenta 30 (1), 79–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Shange GP, Moodley J & Naicker T (2017) Effect of vascular endothelial growth factors A, C and D in HIV-associated pre-eclampsia. Hypertension Preg 36 (2), 196–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Shibuya M (20130 Vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor system: physiological functions in angiogenesis and pathological roles in various diseases. J Biochem 153 (1), 13–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Strain JJ, Yeates AJ, van Wijngaarden E et al. (2015) Prenatal exposure to methylmercury from fish consumption and polyunsaturated fatty acids: associations with child development at 20 months of age in an observational study in the Republic of Seychelles. Am J Clin Nutr 101, 530–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sykes L, MacIntyre DA, Yap XJ, et al. (2012). The Th1:Th2 Dichotomy of Pregnancy and Preterm Labour. Mediators of Inflammation 2012 (1), 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Voller SB, Chock S, Ernst LM et al. (2014) Cord blood biomarkers of vascular endothelial growth (VEGF and sFlt-1) and postnatal growth: a preterm birth cohort study. Early Hum Dev 90 (4), 195–200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Werther K, Christensen IJ 7 Nielsen HJ (2002) Determination of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in circulating blood: significance of VEGF in various leucocytes and platelets. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 62 (5), 343–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wang K, Jiang YZ, Chen DB & Zheng J (2009) Hypoxia enhances FGF2- and VEGF-stiulated human placental artery endothelial cell proliferation: roles of MEK1/2/ERK1/2 and PI3K/AKT1 pathways. Placenta 30 (12), 1045–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wheeler T, Evans PW, Anthony FW et al. (1999) Relationship between maternal serum vascular endothelial growth factor concentration in early pregnancy and fetal and placental growth. Human Reprod 14 (6), 1619–1623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wilkinson AL, Pedersen SH, Urassa M et al. (2017). Maternal systemic or cord blood inflammation is associated with birth anthropometry in a Tanzanian prospective cohort. Tropical Med Int Health 22 (1), 52–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.World Health Organization (2014) C-reactive protein concentrations as a marker of inflammation or infection for interpreting biomarkers of micronutrient status WHO/NMH/NHD/EPG/14.7; Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/133708/1/WHO_NMH_NHD_EPG_14.7_eng.pdf?ua=1 Accessed January 2018