Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2020 Feb 8;29:105264. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105264

Transcriptome data of control and Ascosphaera apis infected Apis mellifera ligustica larval guts

Huazhi Chen 1, Yu Du 1, Zhiwei Zhu 1, Cuiling Xiong 1, Yanzhen Zheng 1, Dafu Chen 1, Rui Guo 1,
PMCID: PMC7029161  PMID: 32099884

Abstract

Ascosphaera apis is an obligate fungal pathogen of honeybee larvae that leads to chalkbrood, which causes heavy losses for the apiculture in China and many other countries. In this article, guts of 4-, 5-, 6-day-old Apis mellifera ligustica larvae challenged by A. apis (AmT1, AmT2, AmT3) and normal 4-day-old larval guts (AmCK) were sequenced using next-generation sequencing technology. On average, 29,196,197, 28,690,943, 29,779,715 and 30,496,725 raw reads were yielded from these four groups; an average of 29,540,895 clean reads were obtained after quality control. In addition, the mapping ratio of clean reads in treatment and control groups to the Apis mellifera genome were over 97.16%. For more insight please see “Uncovering the immune responses of Apis mellifera ligustica larval gut to Ascosphaera apis infection utilizing transcriptome sequencing” [1]. The raw data were submitted to the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database under accession numbers: SRR4084091, SRR4084092, SRR4084095, SRR4084096, SRR4084097, SRR4084098, SRR4084099, SRR4084100, SRR4084101, SRR4084102, SRR4084093, SRR4084094.

Keywords: Western honeybee, Apis mellifera ligustica, Ascosphaera apis, Larvae, Gut, Transcriptome


Specifications Table

Subject Immunology and Microbiology (General)
Specific subject area Transcriptomics
Type of data Table
How data were acquired Illumina HiSeq™ 2500
Data format Raw sequences (FASTQ)
Parameters for data collection Uninfected and Ascosphaera apis-infected larval guts of Apis mellifera ligustica were harvested and stored in liquid nitrogen, followed by total RNA isolation, cDNA library construction and high-throughput sequencing on an illumina HiSeq™ 2500 platform using paired-end strategy.
Description of data collection Guts in treatment groups were sampled from 4-, 5-, 6-day-old A. m. ligustica larvae infected with A. apis (AmT1, AmT2, AmT3), while guts in control group were sampled from 4-day-old A. m. ligustica larvae (AmCK). Total RNA of control and treatment groups were isolated followed by cDNA library construction and next-generation sequencing.
Data source location College of Animal Sciences (College of Bee Science), Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China (latitude 26° 5′ 14.9856″N and longitude 119° 14′ 2.8896″W)
Data accessibility Repository name: National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database
Data identification numbers: SRR4084091, SRR4084092, SRR4084095, SRR4084096, SRR4084097, SRR4084098, SRR4084099, SRR4084100, SRR4084101, SRR4084102, SRR4084093, SRR4084094.
Direct URL to data: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRR4084091, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRR4084092, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRR4084095, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRR4084096, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRR4084097, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRR4084098, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRR4084099, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRR4084100, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRR4084101, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRR4084102, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRR4084093, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRR4084094.
Related research article D.F. Chen, R. Guo, X.J. Xu, C.L. Xiong, Q. Liang, Y.Z. Zheng, Q. Luo, Z.N. Zhang, Z.J. Huang, D. Kumar, W. Xi, X. Zou, M. Liu. Uncovering the immune responses of Apis mellifera ligustica larval gut to Ascosphaera apis infection utilizing transcriptome sequencing. Gene 621 (2017) 40–50 [1].
Value of the data
  • This transcriptome data provides comprehensive information about mRNAs in control and A. apis-infected A. m. ligustica larval guts.

  • The data contribute in understanding interactions between A. m. ligustica larvae and A. apis during chalkbrood.

  • Current data can benefit understanding pathways and genes involved in A. m. ligustica response to A. apis infection.

1. Data description

On average, 29,196,197, 28,690,943, 29,779,715 and 30,496,725 raw reads were respectively generated from AmT1, AmT2, AmT3 and AmCK (Table 1). After strict quality control, an average of 29,540,895 clean reads were obtained, and the ratio of clean reads were over 97.16% in each group (Table 1). Additionally, the mapping ratio of clean reads in each group to the reference genome of A. mellifera were ranged from 86.25% to 89.45% (Table 2). The raw data were deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/) under accession numbers: SRR4084091, SRR4084092, SRR4084095, SRR4084096, SRR4084097, SRR4084098, SRR4084099, SRR4084100, SRR4084101, SRR4084102, SRR4084093, SRR4084094.

Table 1.

Overview of deep sequencing and data quality control.

Sample Raw reads num Clean reads num Adapter sequence Low quality Poly A N
AmT1-1 28,774,864 28,407,618 (98.72%) 106,791 75,473 26 1333
AmT1-2 29,564,924 29,262,394 (98.98%) 90,115 59,827 12 1311
AmT1-3 30,217,832 29,918,578 (99.01%) 84,510 65,005 13 99
AmT2-1 31,786,112 31,429,194 (98.88%) 97,180 81,265 14 0
AmT2-2 26,715,638 26,405,020 (98.84%) 90,573 63,519 12 1205
AmT2-3 28,544,942 28,238,616 (98.93%) 81,579 71,478 7 98
AmT3-1 31,163,300 30,860,010 (99.03%) 85,022 65,121 66 1436
AmT3-2 29,534,074 28,720,324 (97.24%) 100,095 306,303 31 446
AmT3-3 30,629,132 29,758,812 (97.16%) 114,989 319,668 25 478
AmCK-1 31,148,146 30,802,898 (98.89%) 88,842 83,735 27 20
AmCK-2 31,152,632 30,802,898 (98.88%) 101,983 72,783 20 81
AmCK-3 30,237,796 29,884,378 (98.83%) 109,717 65,649 5 1338

Table 2.

Summary of mapping clean reads to the reference genome of Apis mellifera.

Sample Total reads num Unmapped reads num Unique mapped reads num Multiple mapped reads num Mapping ratio
AmT1-1 27,942,952 3,369,197 24,306,993 266,762 87.94%
AmT1-2 29,045,230 3,180,318 25,597,778 267,134 89.05%
AmT1-3 29,759,616 3,202,462 26,288,338 268,816 89.24%
AmT2-1 30,908,790 3,545,971 27,066,899 295,920 88.53%
AmT2-2 26,025,206 3,098,226 22,694,714 232,266 88.10%
AmT2-3 27,965,688 2,996,833 24,701,137 267,718 89.28%
AmT3-1 29,849,508 4,091,689 25,410,587 347,232 86.29%
AmT3-2 28,575,268 3,801,677 24,469,781 303,810 86.70%
AmT3-3 29,512,734 4,059,196 25,166,090 287,448 86.25%
AmCK-1 30,540,156 3,381,653 26,848,849 309,654 88.93%
AmCK-2 30,544,824 3,221,171 26,983,983 339,670 89.45%
AmCK-3 29,636,402 3,240,646 26,010,060 385,696 89.07%

2. Experimental design, materials, and methods

2.1. Honeybee larval gut materials

A. m. ligustica larvae were reared following the previously described method [2]. The diet was mixed and frozen in smaller aliquots and was pre-heated to 34 °C before use. Two-day-old larvae were taken from the combs with a Chinese grafting tool and carefully transferred to the diets (10 μL). The larvae were fed once a day with 20 μL (3-day-old), 30 μL (4-day-old), 40 μL (5-day-old) and 50 μL (6-day-old) diets adding up to 150 μL diet in total.

Based on the method described by Jensen et al. [3], a fresh chalkbrood mummy was sterilized using 10% sodium hypochlorite for 10 min and then rinsed in sterile distilled water for 2 min; subsequently, the mummy was cut into smaller pieces and cultured at 25 °C on plates of Potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium, and at 7 days after culturing, fresh spores of A. apis were purified and used to feed 3-day-old larvae (treatment group) at a final concentration of 107 spore/mL. The larvae consumed all diet were used for further study, whereas the larvae cannot consumed all diets were discarded. Three-day-old larvae in control groups were fed with an artificial diet without A. apis spores. Culture plates (NEXT, China) were incubated at 95% RH and 33 °C according to the method described by Aronstein et al. [4]. The honeybee larval gut is the main site A. apis parasitizes and larvae usually die before the prepupa stage. Twenty-one guts of 4-, 5- or 6-day-old honeybee larvae from A. apis-infected groups (AmT1, AmT2, and AmT3), 21 guts of 4-day-old honeybee larvae from control group (AmCK) were harvested, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C.

2.2. Total RNA isolation, cDNA library preparation and illumina sequencing

Total RNAs were extracted from each sample (pool of seven larval guts) using a TRIzol Kit (Promega, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA quality was checked with a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, USA) and RNase-free agarose gel electrophoresis. The total RNA concentration was detected with a 2100 Bioanalyzer. RNA samples were stored at −80 °C for later library construction and next-generation sequencing. Experiments were conducted using three replicas for each sample from both A. apis-treated groups and control group. Totally, 12 RNA libraries were constructed, representing larval samples from A. apis-infected groups and control group. The libraries were as follows: AmT1-1, AmT1-2 and AmT1-3 were replicate libraries for 4-day-old larvae from the A. apis-treated group, AmT2-1, AmT2-2 and AmT2-3 were replicate libraries for 5-day-old larvae from the A. apis-treated group, AmT3-1, AmT3-2 and AmT3-3 were replicate libraries for 6-day-old larvae from the A. apis-treated group, and AmCK-1, AmCK-2 and AmCK-3 were replicate libraries for 4-day-old larvae from the control group.

Oligo (dTs) were used to isolate poly (A) mRNA, which was then fragmented followed by cDNA synthesis using random hexamers. Next, second-strand cDNAs were synthesized using RNase H and DNA polymerase I. The double-stranded cDNAs were purified using the QiaQuick PCR extraction kit (QIAGEN, Germany). The required fragments were purified by agarose gel electrophoresis and then enriched by PCR amplification. Finally, the amplified fragments were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq™ 2500 platform (GeneDenovo Co., China) using 125 bp pair-end strategy. The raw data produced in this research have been deposited in the NCBI SRA Database under accession numbers: SRR4084091, SRR4084092, SRR4084095, SRR4084096, SRR4084097, SRR4084098, SRR4084099, SRR4084100, SRR4084101, SRR4084102, SRR4084093, SRR4084094.

2.3. Quality control and mapping of RNA-seq data

Firstly, the original sequencing image data were transferred into sequence data via base calling, which is defined as raw data or raw reads stored in the fastq format. Secondly, raw reads of all 12 samples were pre-processed by removing adaptor sequence and reads with more than 5% unknown nucleotides; low-quality reads, defined as reads where the percentage of low-quality bases of quality (Q) value ≤ 5 was more than 50% in a read, were also removed. Finally, the clean reads were aligned to the A. mellifera genome assembly Amel_4.5 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/48?genome_assembly_id=22683) using SOAP aligner/soap2 with the threshold that no more than two mismatches were permitted in the alignment.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-45-KXJ7), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30800806), the science and technology development fund of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (KF2015123), and the undergraduate innovation and entrepreneurship training program of Fujian province (3135602028).

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105264.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.xml (7.3KB, xml)

References

  • 1.Chen D.F., Guo R., Xu X.J., Xiong C.L., Liang Q., Zheng Y.Z., Luo Q., Zhang Z.N., Huang Z.J., Kumar D., Xi W., Zou X., Liu M. Uncovering the immune responses of Apis mellifera ligustica larval gut to Ascosphaera apis infection utilizing transcriptome sequencing. Gene. 2017;621:40–50. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2017.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Peng Y.S.C., Mussen E., Fong A., Montague M.A., Tyler T. Effects of chlortetracycline of honey bee worker larvae reared in vitro. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 1992;60:127–133. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jensen A.B., Aronstein K., Flores J.M., Vojvodic S., Palacio M.A., Spivak M. Standard methods for fungal brood disease research. J. Apicult. Res. 2013;52 doi: 10.3896/IBRA.1.52.1.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Aronstein K.A., Murray K.D., de Leon J.H., Qin X., Weinstock G.M. High mobility group (HMG-box) genes in the honeybee fungal pathogen Ascosphaera apis. Mycologia. 2007;99:553–561. doi: 10.3852/mycologia.99.4.553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.xml (7.3KB, xml)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES