Goodyer IM, Reynolds S, Barrett B, et al. Cognitive behavioural therapy and short-term psychoanalytical psychotherapy versus a brief psychosocial intervention in adolescents with unipolar major depressive disorder (IMPACT): a multicentre, pragmatic, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2017; 4: 109–19—In this Article, the sign (direction) of adjusted treatment effects for secondary outcomes was incorrect for Leyton Obsessional Inventory in Table 2, and major depressive disorder and Antisocial Behaviour Questionnaire in Table 3. In the legend of Table 3, the second sentence should have been “The model was based on data from 36 weeks post-randomisation controlling for prespecified baseline covariates (appendix).” In the penultimate paragraph of the Results section, of 140 patients in remission at week 36, the number who had relapsed by week 86 in the CBT group should have been eight (16%) of 49. These corrections have been made to the online version as of July 21, 2017.
. 2017 Aug;4(8):582. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30283-3
Corrections
© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
PMCID: PMC7029272 PMID: 28748793
This corrects the article "Cognitive behavioural therapy and short-term psychoanalytical psychotherapy versus a brief psychosocial intervention in adolescents with unipolar major depressive disorder (IMPACT): a multicentre, pragmatic, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial" on page 109.
