Abstract
Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) results from dissemination of M. tuberculosis to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and meninges. Ischaemia, hydrocephalus and raised intracranial pressure frequently result, leading to extensive brain injury and neurodisability. The global burden of TBM is unclear and it is likely that many cases are undiagnosed, with many treated cases unreported. Untreated, TBM is uniformly fatal, and even if treated, mortality and morbidity are high. Young age and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are potent risk factors for TBM, while Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) vaccination is protective, particularly in young children. Diagnosis of TBM usually relies on characteristic clinical symptoms and signs, together with consistent neuroimaging and CSF parameters. The ability to confirm the TBM diagnosis via CSF isolation of M. tuberculosis depends on the type of diagnostic tests available. In most cases, the diagnosis remains unconfirmed. GeneXpert MTB/RIF and the next generation Xpert Ultra offer improved sensitivity and rapid turnaround times, and while roll-out has scaled up, availability remains limited. Many locations rely only on acid fast bacilli smear, which is insensitive. Treatment regimens for TBM are based on evidence for pulmonary tuberculosis treatment, with little consideration to CSF penetration or mode of drug action required. The World Health Organization recommends a 12-month treatment course, although data on which to base this duration is lacking. New treatment regimens and drug dosages are under evaluation, with much higher dosages of rifampicin and the inclusion of fluoroquinolones and linezolid identified as promising innovations. The inclusion of corticosteroids at the start of treatment has been demonstrated to reduce mortality in HIV-negative individuals but whether they are universally beneficial is unclear. Other host-directed therapies show promise but evidence for widespread use is lacking. Finally, the management of TBM within health systems is sub-optimal, with drop-offs at every stage in the care cascade.
Keywords: Tuberculosis, Meningitis, Tuberculous meningitis, diagnosis, TBM
Introduction
Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is an extra-pulmonary form of tuberculosis (TB) characterised by sub-acute or chronic inflammation of the meninges as a result of invasion of the sub-arachnoid space by the bacilli M. tuberculosis. Other forms of central nervous system (CNS) TB such as tuberculoma, cerebral abscess, and spinal TB are not categorised as TBM, even though treatment is similar. TBM most commonly affects young children and individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). In the absence of TB treatment, TBM is uniformly fatal 1 and even with treatment, outcomes are poor and chronic neurodisability is common. Much of the damage caused by TBM is due to host-derived inflammatory responses, yet our understanding of these processes is limited. In this review we describe the current global situation for TBM in terms of our understanding of the pathogenesis and natural history, epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. We also explore how TBM is managed within health systems. Challenges in the field of TBM are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Challenges in tuberculous meningitis.
Challenges | Implication | |
---|---|---|
Pathogenesis | Mechanism of dissemination from lungs to
CSF unclear Mechanisms of CSF invasion unclear |
Possible preventative steps/interventions are unclear |
Natural History | Why some individuals develop TBM
unclear |
Focussed prevention therapy not possible |
Epidemiology | No good estimates of global TBM
incidence No good estimates of overall mortality/ morbidity Unclear differentiation between adult and childhood TBM |
Inadequate research funding, inadequate local, country
and international health system investment in treatment and diagnosis of TB meningitis Management tailored for children/adults |
Diagnosis | Inadequate ability to rule-out TBM
Incomplete market penetration of the most effective tests Relatively expensive tests |
Many missed cases of TBM
Late diagnosis and potentially preventable long-term neurologic disability or mortality Testing unavailable in some settings due to cost |
Treatment | Pulmonary TB treatment regimens adapted
(with minimal change) to TBM Incomplete understanding of the best treatment for host immune inflammation |
Likely inadequate TBM treatment regimens
Uncertainty regarding dosing, optimal anti-tuberculous medications Uncertain efficacy/harm of corticosteroids in some populations |
Health Systems | Poor community awareness
Inadequate diagnostic device access |
Missed diagnoses
Inadequate resources committed to TBM Missed diagnoses and poor outcomes |
CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; TBM, tuberculous meningitis; TB, tuberculosis.
Pathogenesis
Primary infection occurs via inhalation of M. tuberculosis-containing aerosolised droplets, followed by activation of neutrophils, dendritic cells and alveolar macrophages, which engulf the mycobacteria in the terminal alveoli. Infected cells then migrate to lymphoid tissue, resulting in activation of Th1 cells and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, with resultant inflammatory changes in the lung parenchyma and vasculature 2. If the mycobacteria reach the vasculature, haematogenous dissemination can occur, with the potential to invade the CNS 3– 5.
The pathogenesis of TBM continues to be debated. A key virulence feature of mycobacteria is the ability to invade the blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barriers. The invasion mechanisms are not clear, although in vitro and animal data suggest that M. tuberculosis may rearrange the actin of the layers 4, 6. It is also possible that a “Trojan horse” mechanism, by which M. tuberculosis is brought across the blood-brain barrier by infected macrophages and neutrophils, may occur 7. Rich and McCordock described the development of a caseating “Rich” focus in the context of TBM pathogenesis 8, 9. It is suggested that the Rich focus is formed via activation of microglial cells and astrocytes once the bacilli have gained access to the brain. Once formed, the Rich foci may become activated rapidly or months to years later, resulting in release of M. tuberculosis into the subarachnoid space, triggering an inflammatory cascade 9. The resulting inflammatory changes may explain some of the clinical features associated with TBM. First, peri-vascular inflammation, particularly of the middle cerebral artery, results in decreased perfusion and cerebral infarct. Second, extension of exudative material to the basal cisterns and the mid-brain leads to disruption of CSF flow, hydrocephalus and raised intracranial pressure. Third, exudates encase cranial nerves, resulting in cranial nerve palsies. Finally, expanding parenchymal tubercles may form tuberculomas and, less frequently, brain abscesses. In contrast (or in addition) to the Rich hypothesis, other researchers have suggested that bacilli reach the CSF during miliary dissemination. Donald and colleagues have proposed a pathogenic mechanism, based on more recent clinical, post mortem and epidemiological data, that articulates the central role of the Rich focus but with an additional component that includes miliary TB 5.
Natural history
The risk and severity of TBM are altered by the status of the host immune response and pathogen virulence, consistent with the damage response framework 10. Multiple host factors such as age, HIV co-infection, Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) immunisation, malnutrition, and helminth co-infection may lead to either a deficient or exaggerated immune response to mycobacterial infection.
Age
Several studies conducted in the pre-chemotherapy era identified children who had been exposed to TB and followed them for tuberculin skin test conversion, chest radiograph changes, clinical progression, and mycobacterial culture positivity. Marais and colleagues reviewed these studies and proposed a timetable for TB, in the absence of drug therapy 11. Following infection with M. tuberculosis, young children are at high risk of progression to TB disease including disseminated forms such as TBM. Both the risk of disease progression and risk of dissemination fall rapidly through childhood, reaching a nadir in the primary school age. In more recent cohorts of children with TBM, the median age is between two and four years 12. Marais and colleagues also found that children who develop miliary TB or TBM generally do so from one to four months after exposure.
HIV
HIV co-infection is the most significant risk factor for TBM in adults and is believed to attenuate the host immune response in the CSF. The impact of HIV on the clinical presentation of TBM is debated, with some studies suggesting a higher rate of extra-meningeal disease and of TB drug resistance 13– 16. Other studies report that the clinical course of TBM is unaltered by HIV infection 17, 18.
BCG, helminth infections and nutrition
Neonatal BCG immunization is effective in preventing childhood TB, particularly TBM and miliary TB 19– 21. Efficacy varies from as high as 80% near the poles, to <20% near the equator, possibly due to masking or blocking from environmental mycobacteria or modulation due to helminth infections 20, 22, 23. Helminth infections activate a T helper type 2 and/or regulatory T cell response and may down-regulate T helper type 1 and T helper type 17 responses to mycobacterial antigens, potentially decreasing BCG vaccine immunogenicity. Whether this is clinically important is unclear 24– 31. Several epidemiological, clinical and laboratory studies have demonstrated that malnutrition, a form of acquired immunodeficiency, increases susceptibility to TB. In particular, vitamin D and vitamin D receptor polymorphisms are critical for function of macrophages in the context of TBM 32– 34. Vitamin D deficiency was significantly more common in TBM compared to controls and pulmonary TB in an Indian study 35.
Strain type
There are seven main M. tuberculosis lineages, each associated with varying degrees of proinflammatory host response. The modern lineage x (Beijing) is associated with disseminated extra-pulmonary disease, drug resistance, and possibly poor treatment outcomes 36– 39. One plausible mechanism of Beijing strain survival is a dampened IFN-γ host inflammatory response, promoting high bacterial load.
Epidemiology
Our understanding of the global burden of TBM is poor. Because of inadequate diagnostic test performance and availability, many cases of TBM remain undiagnosed. Autopsy studies in adults with HIV have found high proportions of TB co-infection, commonly with extrapulmonary disease, including meningitis, which is frequently undiagnosed and untreated prior to death 40. Even those cases diagnosed may not be appropriately reported as individuals with TBM are usually diagnosed in hospitals, which in some contexts, are less likely to be reporting units for TB 41.
The proportion of TBM in cohorts of TB varies dramatically by the local TB prevalence, age, HIV prevalence, and whether the cohort is describing all or only hospitalized persons (which tend to have a higher proportion of TBM cases). A population-based estimate in a low TB-prevalence settings suggested that around 1% of TB cases were TBM 42, while a paediatric hospital-based cohort of confirmed TB in a high TB-burden setting suggested that over 10% of TB cases were TBM 43. Given that the World Health Organization (WHO) estimates 10.4 million new TB cases each year (of which 1 million are children), we suggest that at least 100,000 individuals develop TBM develop annually, but this figure may be much higher.
Untreated, TBM is uniformly fatal. A study from the pre-chemotherapy literature in children demonstrated that the median time to death was 19 and a half days 44. Even if treated, up to 20% of children will die and, of survivors, over half have severe neurodevelopmental sequalae 45. Mortality in HIV-infected adults treated for TBM can be as high as 60% in some cohorts, dependent on degree of immunosuppression, use of antiretroviral therapy and stage of TBM at presentation 14, 46. The total mortality impact of this condition is unclear, and likely underestimated.
Morbidity in TBM survivors is heavily dependent on the age at which the disease occurs and the context in which the individual is living. Survivors require extensive support from medical staff, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, pharmacists and dieticians. Many of these services are not widely available in high TB-burden settings. They also require vast commitments from family and community members, with implications for their quality of life and economic circumstances. Given that they have more potential life years ahead, children lose more disability adjusted life years than older individuals. Even in children with limited neuromotor disability following treatment, cognitive disability, attention-deficit and behavioural problems are more common with TBM survivors than with community controls 47, 48.
Diagnostics
TBM remains difficult to diagnose. Clinical features such as fever, headache, neck stiffness, or a ‘typical’ CSF pattern (elevated protein, lymphocytic pleocytosis, and low glucose) cannot reliably distinguish TBM from other forms of sub-acute meningitis 49, 50. Neuroimaging is frequently unavailable in high TB burden contexts. Where characteristics features of TBM are present on neuroimaging, combinations of basal enhancement, tuberculomas, infarction or hydrocephalus support (but do not confirm) the diagnosis. Many cases of TBM, however, are associated with neuroimaging that does not assist with the diagnosis. Traditional tests to detect bacilli include acid fast bacilli (AFB) smear and culture. AFB smear is rapid and widely available but only 10–15% sensitive in most settings 49, 51. Culture is more sensitive (~50–60%) but results return too slowly to allow for clinical intervention (two-six weeks depending on the media) 50– 53. Death frequently occurs prior to culture results if empiric therapy has not been initiated in the interim period 50. Culture also requires a biosafety level three laboratory, limiting use to referral centres in many settings.
In recent years, nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) have been utilised for TBM diagnosis. The most notable tests are GeneXpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) and the re-engineered GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra), though other commercial and ‘in-house’ NAATs have been used as well 54. Xpert and Xpert Ultra (Cepheid, Inc, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) are cartridge-based, rapid, fully automated polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests. In 2013, the WHO recommended Xpert as the initial test for diagnosis of TBM based on a systematic review of 13 studies 55– 57. Sensitivity is generally similar to culture (50–60%), but with a run-time of two hours 51, 53, 58. Xpert and culture frequently detect cases that the other modality misses and Xpert’s negative predictive value is only 84–94%, meaning that while Xpert is helpful if positive, it cannot effectively rule out TBM 51, 59, 60. One way to maximise Xpert’s utility is to centrifuge larger volumes of CSF (>5ml), although this effect has not been universally observed 51. At present, access to Xpert is increasing although still not adequate 61.
Xpert Ultra utilizes the same instrument as Xpert with a software upgrade. WHO has recommended Xpert Ultra in place of Xpert for TB meningitis based on one study of Ugandan HIV-infected adults with suspected TBM, which found 95% sensitivity versus a composite microbiological end point, and 70% sensitivity versus consensus research case definitions 52, 62. This was as opposed to inferior sensitivities for both Xpert and culture versus the same reference standards 52, 63. A recent cohort reported 86% sensitivity for Xpert Ultra for definite TBM versus 36% for Xpert and 14% for culture 64. Negative predictive values remain inadequate to ‘rule-out’ TBM and the publication of additional studies of Xpert Ultra is required to fully evaluate this technology.
Although there is hope that immunodiagnostics will bridge the gap from Ultra to a definitive diagnostic tool-kit for TBM, thus far, adenosine deaminase, INF-γ release assays, and antibody tests, among others, have not yet proven adequate adjunctive tests for TBM 54, 65. Thus, diagnostic tests remain imperfect (though improving) and a low threshold to start empiric therapy remains a key to effective management of TB meningitis.
Treatment
The evidence to guide treatment in TBM is limited, based mainly on experience with pulmonary TB 66. The first treatment option for TBM, streptomycin became available in 1946 67, 68, albeit at the cost of long, painful treatment duration and poor survival 69– 75. Para-amino salicylic acid (PAS), introduced in the early 1950s, given in combination with streptomycin reduced resistance and mortality, even with poor CSF penetration 72, 76– 79. Isoniazid, with low toxicity and better CNS penetration, was introduced in 1952, whereafter outcomes improved 76, 77, 80– 83. Rifampicin and pyrazinamide were used in TBM treatment regimens from 1970 onwards; however, initially there was no significant reduction in mortality compared to regimens containing streptomycin, PAS and isoniazid 76, 84– 87.
Available treatment options for TBM are hampered by poor CSF penetration and toxicity 76, 88. Of the first-line TB drugs, pharmacokinetic studies have shown that isoniazid and pyrazinamide have the best CSF penetration 88. In children, modelling suggests that higher dosages of rifampicin may be required 89, while in adults, doses up to 600mg per day increases CSF penetration 88, 90. Ethambutol and streptomycin both have poor CSF penetration. Second-line TB drugs with good CSF penetration include ethionamide, the fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and ofloxacin) and terizidone 88. Linezolid is another potential treatment option, given excellent CSF penetration 76, 91. Moxifloxacin up to 800mg per day has demonstrated good CSF concentration with low toxicity 90, 92.
Current WHO treatment guidelines for TBM recommend two months of a four-drug regimen (rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol) in both adults and children, followed by 7–10 months of rifampicin and isoniazid 93, 94. Similar dosing to pulmonary TB is advocated based on low quality evidence ( Table 2) 88, 95. Thus, the focus of recent TBM trials has been to optimize CNS penetration while minimizing toxicity using alternative regimens, higher doses and/or shorter treatment. Adjunctive levofloxacin (20mg/kg per day) did not demonstrate increased survival benefit among adults in one Vietnamese randomized controlled trial 96– 98. Regarding dosing strategies, high-dose intravenous rifampicin for the first two weeks of treatment demonstrated increased CSF drug concentration as well as significant reduction in six-month mortality 90, 99, 100. Similarly, a study evaluating an abbreviated course (six months in HIV-uninfected and nine months in HIV-infected children) of a high dose four-drug regimen (rifampicin 20mg/kg, isoniazid 20mg/kg, pyrazinamide 40mg/kg and ethionamide 20mg/kg) demonstrated mortality of less than 5% 101.
Table 2. World Health Organization recommended drug dosing for adults and children with tuberculous meningitis 93, 94.
Drug | Adult dosage and range
(mg/kg) |
Childhood dosage and
range (mg/kg) |
Maximum
dosage (mg/day) |
---|---|---|---|
Isoniazid (H) | 5 (4-6) | 10 (10-15) | 300 |
Rifampicin (R) | 10 (8-12) | 15 (10-20) | 600 |
Pyrazinamide (Z) | 25 (20-30) | 35 (30-40) | |
Ethambutol (E) | 15 (15-20) | 20 (15-25) |
Adjuvant immunomodulatory treatment is used in TBM to ameliorate the potentially damaging host response. A 2016 Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis found that adjunctive corticosteroids reduce mortality in the short term but had no effect on long-term neurological disability in HIV-uninfected patients with TBM; however, the benefit of corticosteroids is unclear in HIV co-infected individuals 102. Corticosteroids may have a differential effect dependent on leukotriene A4 hydrolase genotype, being beneficial in those with a hyper-inflammatory genotype but detrimental in others. Use of adjunctive aspirin has been shown to be beneficial in adults with TBM 103, 104, with one recent study of high dose aspirin demonstrating prevention of new cerebral infarction in adults 105. This effect, however, has not been demonstrated in children and requires larger randomised trials in adults 106. Currently registered clinical trials for TBM are shown in Table 3.
Table 3. Currently open and registered clinical trials in tuberculous meningitis (from the ClinicalTrials.gov and ISRCTN registries).
Trial Name | Registration
Number |
Countries
Recruiting |
Target Patient Group | Study Arms | Primary Outcome | Sample
Size |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Optimizing Anti-tuberculosis
Therapy in Adults with Tuberculous Meningitis |
NCT03787940 | China | Adults 18–65 years | Standard dose vs. high dose isoniazid for
rapid NAT2 acetylators |
Death or severe disability at 12
months from enrolment |
338 rapid
acetylators |
Retrospective Real-word
Study of Linezolid for the Treatment of Tuberculous Meningitis |
NCT03898635 | China | Adults 18 years and
older |
1. No linezolid in treatment regimen at
any point 2. Linezolid added during the treatment course 3. Linezolid in treatment regimen from beginning |
Survival within five years | n/s |
Linezolid, Aspirin and
Enhanced Dose Rifampicin in HIV-TBM (LASER-TBM) |
NCT03927313 | South Africa | HIV-infected adults
(>18 years) |
1. Standard of care drug regimen at
standard of care dosages 2. Higher dosages of rifampicin and the addition of linezolid for the first 56 days of treatment 3. Higher dosages of rifampicin and the addition of linezolid and aspirin for the first 56 days of treatment |
Treatment related adverse events | 100 |
Adjunctive Corticosteroids
for Tuberculous Meningitis in HIV-infected Adults (The ACT HIV Trial) |
NCT03092817 | Vietnam,
Indonesia |
HIV-infected adults
(>18 years) |
Dexamethasone vs. placebo | Survival 12 months post
randomisation |
520 |
Leukotriene A4 Hydrolase
Stratified Trial of Adjunctive Corticosteroids for HIV- uninfected Adults with Tuberculous Meningitis |
NCT03100786 | Vietnam | HIV-uninfected adults
(>18 years) |
1. Open label dexamethasone for all
patients with TT genotype for first 6–8 weeks treatment 2. Individuals with CT or CC genotypes randomised to dexamethasone or placebo for first 6–8 weeks treatment |
All-cause mortality or new
neurological event by 12 months post randomisation |
640 |
Optimizing Treatment to
Improve TBM Outcomes in Children (TBM-KIDS) |
NCT02958709 | India,
Malawi |
Children | 1. High dose rifampicin in a standard
drug regimen 2. High dose rifampicin and levofloxacin instead of ethambutol 3. Standard dose rifampicin in a standard drug regimen |
Characterise the pharmacokinetic
parameters of rifampicin and levofloxacin and describe outcomes and safety |
120 |
Harvest trial - improving
outcomes from TB meningitis with high dose oral rifampicin |
ISRCTN15668391 | Uganda,
b/South Africa, Indonesia |
Adults (>18 years) | Standardly dosed regimen compared to a
standard drug regimen but with elevated rifampicin dosage |
Six-month survival | 500 |
SURE: Short intensive
treatment for children with tuberculous meningitis |
ISRCTN40829906 | India,
Uganda, Vietnam, Zambia, Zimbabwe |
Children under 15
years (and over 28 days) |
Factorial design:
• First randomisation: standard drug regimen vs. drug regimen with high dose rifampicin and substitution of ethambutol with levofloxacin • Second randomisation: aspirin vs. placebo |
First randomisation: all-cause
mortality by 48 weeks Second randomisation: neurodevelopment at 48 weeks assessed using a Modified Rankin Score |
400 |
Improving diagnosis and
treatment of HIV-associated Tuberculous meningitis |
ISRCTN42218549 | Uganda | Adults (>18 years) | 1. Intravenous 20mg/kg/day rifampicin
for two weeks (followed by oral rifampicin 35mg/kg/day for six weeks) 2. Oral 35mg/kg/day rifampicin for eight weeks 3. Standard of care oral rifampicin (~10mg/kg/day) for eight weeks |
Pharmacokinetic parameters and
safety composite endpoint |
60 |
TB mass lesions, usually in the setting of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) and optochisamic arachnoiditis, are difficult to treat and often occur near vital structures in the brainstem and spinal cord. Thalidomide, a potent TNF-α inhibitor, has demonstrated clinical benefit in both TB mass lesions and optochiasmic arachnoiditis 107, 108. Reports have also demonstrated a clinical role for other agents that cause TNF-α inhibition, including infliximab and IFN-γ 109– 111. Prophylactic pyridoxine (5–10 mg per day in children and 10 mg per day in adults) is recommended to prevent isoniazid related peripheral neuropathy 93, 94. Neuropathy is more severe during pregnancy, HIV co-infection, alcohol dependency, malnutrition, diabetes, chronic liver disease and renal failure. Treatment of hydrocephalus depends on the level of CSF obstruction. Communicating hydrocephalus, a common complication of TBM, can be successfully treated with one month of acetazolamide 50 mg/kg per day and frusemide 1 mg/kg per day 112, 113.
Health systems
The care cascade for TBM has not been specifically investigated. For TB more generally, large gaps exist at every stage from incidence to diagnosis, from diagnosis to treatment and from treatment initiation to favourable outcome 114– 116. However, there are specific challenges for health systems in their management of TBM, including rehabilitation following treatment conclusion, that suggest gaps could be even larger than for TB as a whole.
Symptoms of TBM are non-specific and community sensitisation is poor. Even where sensitisation to TB has occurred, this is usually to the symptoms and signs of pulmonary TB, such as cough, weight loss, night sweats and haemoptysis 117. If individuals with TBM do present for evaluation, it is commonly to primary care facilities, at which staff training and experience can be limited and appropriate investigations, such as lumbar puncture or cerebral imaging, are often unavailable. Multiple presentations to healthcare workers are common and are associated with delayed diagnosis and treatment initiation 118, 119. Referral from primary care to hospital can lead to further delays and frequently incur costs to patients and families. These delays can lead to clinical deterioration 120.
Even when an individual presents to a hospital for evaluation, the availability of Xpert is variable globally 61. Although AFB smear is widely available, it has limited sensitivity and culture, if available, returns results in a timescale that is not clinically useful. Although drug therapy is usually provided freely by national TB programmes and is available at peripheral care settings, the specialist services required to appropriately manage TBM, such as paediatrics, neurology, neurosurgery and rehabilitation, are usually only available in specialist centres in larger urban areas and frequently incur costs for patients.
Surveillance data for TBM is limited, with cases rarely reported if patients die before starting treatment. Many patients with TBM are cared for in hospitals for most of their illness and given that many hospitals are not TB-reporting units, these cases are not reflected in regional, national or global reports. Disaggregation of data occurs to the level of pulmonary TB and extrapulmonary TB, without specifying the site of disease. Some electronic registers allow the recording of International Classification of Diseases 10 th revision (ICD-10) codes, but these are often poorly completed.
Conclusions
TBM is the most severe form of TB and is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Our understanding of the global burden is limited but it is likely that most cases are not diagnosed and appropriately treated. At least 100,000 cases are likely to occur each year. The current diagnostic tools are largely inadequate, and treatment is usually started only once substantial neurological damage has occurred. Treatment, both anti-mycobacterial and anti-inflammatory, require further investigation and optimisation, and improvements at every stage along the care cascade are urgently needed.
Data availability
No data are associated with this article.
Acknowledgements
Tuberculous Meningitis International Research Consortium
Rob E. Aarnoutse; Suzanne T. B. Anderson; Nathan C. Bahr; Nguyen D. Bang; David R. Boulware; Tom Boyles; Lindsey H. M. te Brake; Satish Chandra; Felicia C. Chow; Fiona V. Cresswell; Reinout van Crevel; Angharad G. Davis; Sofiati Dian; Joseph Donovan; Kelly E. Dooley; Anthony Figaji; A. Rizal Ganiem; Ravindra Kumar Garg; Diana M. Gibb; Raph L. Hamers; Nguyen T. T. Hiep; Darma Imran; Akhmad Imron; Sanjay K. Jain; Sunil K. Jain; Byramee Jeejeebhoy; Jayantee Kalita; Rashmi Kumar; Vinod Kumar; Arjan van Laarhoven; Rachel P-J. Lai; Abi Manesh; Suzaan Marais; Vidya Mave; Graeme Meintjes; David B. Meya; Usha K. Misra; Manish Modi; Alvaro A. Ordonez; Nguyen H. Phu; Sunil Pradhan; Kameshwar Prasad; Alize M. Proust; Lalita Ramakrishnan; Ursula Rohlwink; Rovina Ruslami; Johannes F. Schoeman; James A. Seddon; Kusum Sharma; Omar Siddiqi; Regan S. Solomons; Nguyen T. T. Thuong; Guy E. Thwaites; Ronald van Toorn; Elizabeth W. Tucker; Sean A. Wasserman; Robert J. Wilkinson.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust through funding to the Tuberculous Meningitis International Research Consortium. JAS is supported by a Clinician Scientist Fellowship jointly funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) and the UK Department for International Development (DFID) under the MRC/DFID Concordat agreement [MR/R007942/1]. RS is supported by the National Research Foundation of South Africa [109437].
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Contributor Information
Tuberculous Meningitis International Research Consortium:
Rob E. Aarnoutse, Rob E. Aarnoutse, Suzanne T. B. Anderson, Suzanne T. B. Anderson, Nathan C. Bahr, Nguyen D. Bang, David R. Boulware, Tom Boyles, Lindsey H. M. te Brake, Satish Chandra, Felicia C. Chow, Fiona V. Cresswell, Reinout van Crevel, Angharad G. Davis, Sofiati Dian, Joseph Donovan, Kelly E. Dooley, Anthony Figaji, A. Rizal Ganiem, Ravindra Kumar Garg, Diana M. Gibb, Raph L. Hamers, Nguyen T. T. Hiep, Darma Imran, Akhmad Imron, Sanjay K. Jain, Sunil K. Jain, Byramee Jeejeebhoy, Jayantee Kalita, Rashmi Kumar, Vinod Kumar, Arjan van Laarhoven, Rachel P-J. Lai, Abi Manesh, Suzaan Marais, Vidya Mave, Graeme Meintjes, David B. Meya, Usha K. Misra, Manish Modi, Alvaro A. Ordonez, Nguyen H. Phu, Sunil Pradhan, Kameshwar Prasad, Alize M. Proust, Lalita Ramakrishnan, Ursula Rohlwink, Rovina Ruslami, Johannes F. Schoeman, James A. Seddon, Kusum Sharma, Omar Siddiqi, Regan S. Solomons, Nguyen T. T. Thuong, Guy E. Thwaites, Ronald van Toorn, Elizabeth W. Tucker, Sean A. Wasserman, and Robert J. Wilkinson
References
- 1. Jullien S, Ryan H, Modi M, et al. : Six months therapy for tuberculous meningitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;9:CD012091. 10.1002/14651858.CD012091.pub2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. O'Garra A, Redford PS, McNab FW, et al. : The immune response in tuberculosis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2013;31:475–527. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-095939 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Krishnan N, Robertson BD, Thwaites G: The mechanisms and consequences of the extra-pulmonary dissemination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2010;90(6):361–366. 10.1016/j.tube.2010.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Jain SK, Paul-Satyaseela M, Lamichhane G, et al. : Mycobacterium tuberculosis invasion and traversal across an in vitro human blood-brain barrier as a pathogenic mechanism for central nervous system tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 2006;193(9):1287–1295. 10.1086/502631 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Donald PR, Schaaf HS, Schoeman JF: Tuberculous meningitis and miliary tuberculosis: the Rich focus revisited. J Infect. 2005;50(3):193–195. 10.1016/j.jinf.2004.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Be NA, Kim KS, Bishai WR, et al. : Pathogenesis of central nervous system tuberculosis. Curr Mol Med. 2009;9(2):94–99. 10.2174/156652409787581655 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Nguyen L, Pieters J: The Trojan horse: survival tactics of pathogenic mycobacteria in macrophages. Trends Cell Biol. 2005;15(5):269–276. 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Hektoen L: The Vascular Changes of Tuberculous Meningitis, Especially the Tuberculous Endarterities. J Exp Med. 1896;1(1):112–163. 10.1084/jem.1.1.112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Rich AR, McCordock HA: The pathogenesis of tuberculous meningitis. Bull Johns Hopkins Hospital. 1933;52:5–37. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Pirofski LA, Casadevall A: Immune-Mediated Damage Completes the Parabola: Cryptococcus neoformans Pathogenesis Can Reflect the Outcome of a Weak or Strong Immune Response. mBio. 2017;8(6): pii: e02063–17. 10.1128/mBio.02063-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Marais BJ, Gie RP, Schaaf HS, et al. : The natural history of childhood intra-thoracic tuberculosis: a critical review of literature from the pre-chemotherapy era. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2004;8(4):392–402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. van Well GT, Paes BF, Terwee CB, et al. : Twenty years of pediatric tuberculous meningitis: a retrospective cohort study in the western cape of South Africa. Pediatrics. 2009;123(1):e1–8. 10.1542/peds.2008-1353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Torok ME, Chau TT, Mai PP, et al. : Clinical and microbiological features of HIV-associated tuberculous meningitis in Vietnamese adults. PLoS One. 2008;3(3):e1772. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001772 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Thwaites GE, Duc Bang N, Huy Dung N, et al. : The influence of HIV infection on clinical presentation, response to treatment, and outcome in adults with Tuberculous meningitis. J Infect Dis. 2005;192(12):2134–2141. 10.1086/498220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Karstaedt AS, Valtchanova S, Barriere R, et al. : Tuberculous meningitis in South African urban adults. QJM. 1998;91(11):743–747. 10.1093/qjmed/91.11.743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Thwaites GE, Lan NT, Dung NH, et al. : Effect of antituberculosis drug resistance on response to treatment and outcome in adults with tuberculous meningitis. J Infect Dis. 2005;192(1):79–88. 10.1086/430616 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Katrak SM, Shembalkar PK, Bijwe SR, et al. : The clinical, radiological and pathological profile of tuberculous meningitis in patients with and without human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Neurol Sci. 2000;181(1–2):118–126. 10.1016/s0022-510x(00)00440-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Karande S, Gupta V, Kulkarni M, et al. : Tuberculous meningitis and HIV. Indian J Pediatr. 2005;72(9):755–760. 10.1007/BF02734147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Trunz BB, Fine P, Dye C: Effect of BCG vaccination on childhood tuberculous meningitis and miliary tuberculosis worldwide: a meta-analysis and assessment of cost-effectiveness. Lancet. 2006;367(9517):1173–1180. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68507-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Mangtani P, Abubakar I, Ariti C, et al. : Protection by BCG vaccine against tuberculosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(4):470–480. 10.1093/cid/cit790 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kelekçi S, Karabel M, Karabel D, et al. : Bacillus Calmette-Guérin is a preventive factor in mortality of childhood tuberculous meningitis. Int J Infect Dis. 2014;21:1–4. 10.1016/j.ijid.2013.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Fine PE: Variation in protection by BCG: implications of and for heterologous immunity. Lancet. 1995;346(8986):1339–1345. 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92348-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Arregui S, Sanz J, Marinova D, et al. : On the impact of masking and blocking hypotheses for measuring the efficacy of new tuberculosis vaccines. PeerJ. 2016;4:e1513. 10.7717/peerj.1513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Roy A, Eisenhut M, Harris RJ, et al. : Effect of BCG vaccination against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in children: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014;349:g4643. 10.1136/bmj.g4643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Babu S, Nutman TB: Helminth-Tuberculosis Co-infection: An Immunologic Perspective. Trends Immunol. 2016;37(9):597–607. 10.1016/j.it.2016.07.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Gaze S, Bethony JM, Periago MV: Immunology of experimental and natural human hookworm infection. Parasite Immunol. 2014;36(8):358–366. 10.1111/pim.12088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. King CL, Mahanty S, Kumaraswami V, et al. : Cytokine control of parasite-specific anergy in human lymphatic filariasis. Preferential induction of a regulatory T helper type 2 lymphocyte subset. J Clin Invest. 1993;92(4):1667–1673. 10.1172/JCI116752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Neto LM, Oliveira Rde V, Totino PR, et al. : Enteroparasitosis prevalence and parasitism influence in clinical outcomes of tuberculosis patients with or without HIV co-infection in a reference hospital in Rio de Janeiro (2000-2006). Braz J Infect Dis. 2009;13(6):427–432. 10.1590/s1413-86702009000600008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Tristão-Sá R, Ribeiro-Rodrigues R, Johnson LT, et al. : Intestinal nematodes and pulmonary tuberculosis. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2002;35(5):533–535. 10.1590/s0037-86822002000500020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Elias D, Mengistu G, Akuffo H, et al. : Are intestinal helminths risk factors for developing active tuberculosis? Trop Med Int Health. 2006;11(4):551–558. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01578.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Brown M, Miiro G, Nkurunziza P, et al. : Schistosoma mansoni, nematode infections, and progression to active tuberculosis among HIV-1-infected Ugandans. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;74(5):819–825. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Bar-Shavit Z, Teitelbaum SL, Reitsma P, et al. : Induction of monocytic differentiation and bone resorption by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983;80(19):5907–5911. 10.1073/pnas.80.19.5907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Chandra G, Selvaraj P, Jawahar MS, et al. : Effect of vitamin D 3 on phagocytic potential of macrophages with live Mycobacterium tuberculosis and lymphoproliferative response in pulmonary tuberculosis. J Clin Immunol. 2004;24(3):249–257. 10.1023/B:JOCI.0000025446.44146.52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Rigby WF, Shen L, Ball ED, et al. : Differentiation of a human monocytic cell line by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (calcitriol): a morphologic, phenotypic, and functional analysis. Blood. 1984;64(5):1110–1115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Rizvi I, Garg RK, Jain A, et al. : Vitamin D status, vitamin D receptor and toll like receptor-2 polymorphisms in tuberculous meningitis: a case-control study. Infection. 2016;44(5):633–640. 10.1007/s15010-016-0907-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Faksri K, Drobniewski F, Nikolayevskyy V, et al. : Epidemiological trends and clinical comparisons of Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineages in Thai TB meningitis. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2011;91(6):594–600. 10.1016/j.tube.2011.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Hang NT, Maeda S, Lien LT, et al. : Primary drug-resistant tuberculosis in Hanoi, Viet Nam: present status and risk factors. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e71867. 10.1371/journal.pone.0071867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Huyen MN, Buu TN, Tiemersma E, et al. : Tuberculosis relapse in Vietnam is significantly associated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing genotype infections. J Infect Dis. 2013;207(10):1516–1524. 10.1093/infdis/jit048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Hang NT, Maeda S, Keicho N, et al. : Sublineages of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing genotype strains and unfavorable outcomes of anti-tuberculosis treatment. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2015;95(3):336–342. 10.1016/j.tube.2015.02.040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Gupta RK, Lucas SB, Fielding KL, et al. : Prevalence of tuberculosis in post-mortem studies of HIV-infected adults and children in resource-limited settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS. 2015;29(15):1987–2002. 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. du Preez K, Schaaf HS, Dunbar R, et al. : Incomplete registration and reporting of culture-confirmed childhood tuberculosis diagnosed in hospital. Public Health Action. 2011;1(1):19–24. 10.5588/pha.11.0010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Ducomble T, Tolksdorf K, Karagiannis I, et al. : The burden of extrapulmonary and meningitis tuberculosis: an investigation of national surveillance data, Germany, 2002 to 2009. Euro Surveill. 2013;18(12):pii: 20436. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Seddon JA, Hesseling AC, Marais BJ, et al. : The evolving epidemic of drug-resistant tuberculosis among children in Cape Town, South Africa. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012;16(7):928–933. 10.5588/ijtld.11.0679 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Lincoln EM: Tuberculous meningitis in children; with special reference to serous meningitis; serous tuberculous meningitis. Am Rev Tuberc. 1947;56(2):75–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Chiang SS, Khan FA, Milstein MB, et al. : Treatment outcomes of childhood tuberculous meningitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(10):947–957. 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70852-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Cecchini D, Ambrosioni J, Brezzo C, et al. : Tuberculous meningitis in HIV-infected and non-infected patients: comparison of cerebrospinal fluid findings. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009;13(2):269–271. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Wait JW, Stanton L, Schoeman JF: Tuberculosis meningitis and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children. J Trop Pediatr. 2002;48(5):294–299. 10.1093/tropej/48.5.294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Wait JW, Schoeman JF: Behaviour profiles after tuberculous meningitis. J Trop Pediatr. 2010;56(3):166–171. 10.1093/tropej/fmp080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Bahr NC, Boulware DR: Methods of rapid diagnosis for the etiology of meningitis in adults. Biomark Med. 2014;8(9):1085–1103. 10.2217/bmm.14.67 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Bahr NC, Meintjes G, Boulware DR: Inadequate diagnostics: the case to move beyond the bacilli for detection of meningitis due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Med Microbiol. 2019;68(5):755–760. 10.1099/jmm.0.000975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Bahr NC, Tugume L, Rajasingham R, et al. : Improved diagnostic sensitivity for tuberculous meningitis with Xpert ® MTB/RIF of centrifuged CSF. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015;19(10):1209–1215. 10.5588/ijtld.15.0253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Bahr NC, Nuwagira E, Evans EE, et al. : Diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for tuberculous meningitis in HIV-infected adults: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):68–75. 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30474-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Nhu NT, Heemskerk D, Thu do DA, et al. : Evaluation of GeneXpert MTB/RIF for diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(1):226–233. 10.1128/JCM.01834-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Pormohammad A, Nasiri MJ, McHugh TD, et al. : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Tuberculous Meningitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2019;57(6): pii: e01113-18. 10.1128/JCM.01113-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Denkinger CM, Schumacher SG, Boehme CC, et al. : Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2014;44(2):435–446. 10.1183/09031936.00007814 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Automated Real-Time Nucleic Acid Amplification Technology for Rapid and Simultaneous Detection of Tuberculosis and Rifampicin Resistance: Xpert MTB/RIF Assay for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary and Extrapulmonary TB in Adults and Children: Policy Update. Geneva,2013. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland: Global Tuberculosis Report 2014. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
- 58. Patel VB, Theron G, Lenders L, et al. : Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative PCR (Xpert MTB/RIF) for tuberculous meningitis in a high burden setting: a prospective study. PLoS Med. 2013;10(10):e1001536. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001536 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Bahr NC, Marais S, Caws M, et al. : GeneXpert MTB/Rif to Diagnose Tuberculous Meningitis: Perhaps the First Test but not the Last. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(9):1133–5. 10.1093/cid/ciw083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Boyles TH, Thwaites GE: Appropriate use of the Xpert® MTB/RIF assay in suspected tuberculous meningitis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015;19(3):276–277. 10.5588/ijtld.14.0805 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Cazabon D, Pande T, Kik S, et al. : Market penetration of Xpert MTB/RIF in high tuberculosis burden countries: A trend analysis from 2014 - 2016 [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. Gates Open Res. 2018;2:35. 10.12688/gatesopenres.12842.2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Meeting Report of a Technical Expert Consultation: Non-inferiority analysis of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra compared to Xpert MTB/RIF. (accessed 11 April 2019).2017. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
- 63. Marais S, Thwaites G, Schoeman JF, et al. : Tuberculous meningitis: a uniform case definition for use in clinical research. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10(11):803–812. 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70138-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Wang G, Wang S, Jiang G, et al. : Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra improved the diagnosis of paucibacillary tuberculosis: A prospective cohort study. J Infect. 2019;78(4):311–316. 10.1016/j.jinf.2019.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Bahr NC, Halupnick R, Linder G, et al. : Delta-like 1 protein, vitamin D binding protein and fetuin for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis meningitis. Biomark Med. 2018;12(7):707–716. 10.2217/bmm-2017-0373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Heemskerk D, Day J, Chau TT, et al. : Intensified treatment with high dose rifampicin and levofloxacin compared to standard treatment for adult patients with tuberculous meningitis (TBM-IT): protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2011;12:25. 10.1186/1745-6215-12-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Cooke RE, Dunphy DL, Blake FG: Streptomycin in tuberculous meningitis; a report of its use in a one-year-old infant. Yale J Biol Med. 1946;18:221–226. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Tucker WB: Evaluation of streptomycin regimens in the treatment of tuberculosis; an account of the study of the Veterans Administration, Army, and Navy, July 1946 to April 1949. Am Rev Tuberc. 1949;60(6):715–754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Smith HV, Vollum RL, Cairns H: Treatment of tuberculous meningitis with streptomycin. Lancet. 1948;1(6504):627–636. 10.1016/s0140-6736(48)90813-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Cairns H, Smith HV, Vollum RL: Tuberculous meningitis. J Am Med Assoc. 1950;144(2):92–96. 10.1001/jama.1950.02920020012004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. McSweeney CJ: The treatment of tuberculous meningitis. Tubercle. 1950;31(9):210–213. 10.1016/s0041-3879(50)80013-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Bernard E, Duroux A, Lotte A, et al. : [Results of therapy of tuberculous meningitis in adults; study of 255 cases]. Bull Mem Soc Med Hop Paris. 1954;70(30–31):1118–1127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Lorber J: The results of treatment of 549 cases of tuberculous meningitis. Am Rev Tuberc. 1954;69(1):13–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Debre R: The prognosis of tuberculous meningitis. Am Rev Tuberc. 1952;65(2):168–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Lepper MH, Spies HW: The present status of the treatment of tuberculosis of the central nervous system. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1963;106:106–123. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1963.tb16629.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Donald PR: The chemotherapy of tuberculous meningitis in children and adults. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2010;90(6):375–392. 10.1016/j.tube.2010.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Fitzpatrick MJ: The treatment of tuberculous meningitis; a study of forty-six adult patients. Am Rev Tuberc. 1954;69(3):370–382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Lorber J: Tuberculous meningitis in children treated with streptomycin and P.A.S. Lancet. 1954;266(6822):1104–1107. 10.1016/s0140-6736(54)92155-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Debre R, Brissaud HE: Present method and results of treatment of tuberculous meningitis. Am Rev Tuberc. 1956;74(2 Part 2):221–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Elmendorf DF, Jr, Cawthon WU, Muschenheim C, et al. : The absorption, distribution, excretion, and short-term toxicity of isonicotinic acid hydrazide (nydrazid) in man. Am Rev Tuberc. 1952;65(4):429–442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Barclay WR, Ebert RH, Le Roy GV, et al. : Distribution and excretion of radioactive isoniazid in tuberculous patients. J Am Med Assoc. 1953;151(16):1384–1388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Fletcher AP: C.S.F.--isoniazid levels in tuberculous meningitis. Lancet. 1953;265(6788):694–696. 10.1016/s0140-6736(53)90420-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Pellegrino ED, Petrik FG, Horton R: The treatment of tuberculous meningitis in infants with streptomycin and isonicotinic acid hydrazide (isoniazid); a preliminary report of six patients under the age of two years treated without intrathecal medication. Dis Chest. 1954;26(2):146–165. 10.1378/chest.26.2.146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Rahajoe NN, Rahajoe N, Boediman I, et al. : The treatment of tuberculous meningitis in children with A combination of isoniazid, rifampicin and streptomycin (a preliminary report). Paediatr Indones. 1979;19(11–12):285–294. 10.14238/pi19.11-12.1979.285-94 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Doğanay M, Bakir M, Dökmetaş I: Treatment of tuberculous meningitis in adults with a combination of isoniazid, rifampicin and streptomycin: a prospective study. Scand J Infect Dis. 1989;21(1):81–85. 10.3109/00365548909035684 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Girgis NI, Yassin MW, Laughlin LW, et al. : Rifampicin in the treatment of tuberculous meningitis. J Trop Med Hyg. 1978;81(12):246–247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Sunakorn P, Wongsaroj P: Rifampin in treatment of tuberculous meningitis in children. J Med Assoc Thai. 1978;61(2):93–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Donald PR: Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of antituberculosis agents in adults and children. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2010;90(5):279–292. 10.1016/j.tube.2010.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Savic RM, Ruslami R, Hibma JE, et al. : Pediatric tuberculous meningitis: Model-based approach to determining optimal doses of the anti-tuberculosis drugs rifampin and levofloxacin for children. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015;98(6):622–629. 10.1002/cpt.202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Ruslami R, Ganiem AR, Dian S, et al. : Intensified regimen containing rifampicin and moxifloxacin for tuberculous meningitis: an open-label, randomised controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(1):27–35. 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70264-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Davis A, Meintjes G, Wilkinson RJ: Treatment of Tuberculous Meningitis and Its Complications in Adults. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2018;20(3):5. 10.1007/s11940-018-0490-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Donald PR: Chemotherapy for Tuberculous Meningitis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(2):179–181. 10.1056/NEJMe1511990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.In: th ed. Treatment of Tuberculosis: Guidelines. Geneva.2010. [Google Scholar]
- 94.In: nd ed. Guidance for National Tuberculosis Programmes on the Management of Tuberculosis in Children. Geneva.2014. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.In: Rapid Advice: Treatment of Tuberculosis in Children. Geneva.2010. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Thwaites GE, Bhavnani SM, Chau TT, et al. : Randomized pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of fluoroquinolones for tuberculous meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(7):3244–3253. 10.1128/AAC.00064-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Heemskerk AD, Bang ND, Mai NT, et al. : Intensified Antituberculosis Therapy in Adults with Tuberculous Meningitis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(2):124–134. 10.1056/NEJMoa1507062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Rizvi I, Malhotra HS, Garg RK, et al. : Fluoroquinolones in the management of tuberculous meningitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect. 2018;77(4):261–275. 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Ruslami R, Ganiem AR, Aarnoutse RE, et al. : Rifampicin and moxifloxacin for tuberculous meningitis--authors' reply. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(7):570. 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70156-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Te Brake L, Dian S, Ganiem AR, et al. : Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of an intensified regimen containing rifampicin and moxifloxacin for tuberculous meningitis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015;45(5):496–503. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.12.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. van Toorn R, Schaaf HS, Laubscher JA, et al. : Short intensified treatment in children with drug-susceptible tuberculous meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014;33(3):248–252. 10.1097/INF.0000000000000065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Prasad K, Singh MB, Ryan H: Corticosteroids for managing tuberculous meningitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD002244. 10.1002/14651858.CD002244.pub4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Misra UK, Kalita J, Nair PP: Role of aspirin in tuberculous meningitis: a randomized open label placebo controlled trial. J Neurol Sci. 2010;293(1–2):12–17. 10.1016/j.jns.2010.03.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Misra UK, Kalita J, Sagar B, et al. : Does adjunctive corticosteroid and aspirin therapy improve the outcome of tuberculous meningitis? Neurol India. 2018;66(6):1672–1677. 10.4103/0028-3886.246278 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Mai NT, Dobbs N, Phu NH, et al. : A randomised double blind placebo controlled phase 2 trial of adjunctive aspirin for tuberculous meningitis in HIV-uninfected adults. eLife. 2018;7: pii: e33478. 10.7554/eLife.33478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Schoeman JF, Janse van Rensburg A, Laubscher JA, et al. : The role of aspirin in childhood tuberculous meningitis. J Child Neurol. 2011;26(8):956–962. 10.1177/0883073811398132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. van Toorn R, du Plessis AM, Schaaf HS, et al. : Clinicoradiologic response of neurologic tuberculous mass lesions in children treated with thalidomide. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015;34(2):214–218. 10.1097/INF.0000000000000539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Schoeman JF, Andronikou S, Stefan DC, et al. : Tuberculous meningitis-related optic neuritis: recovery of vision with thalidomide in 4 consecutive cases. J Child Neurol. 2010;25(7):822–828. 10.1177/0883073809350507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Wilkinson RJ, Rohlwink U, Misra UK, et al. : Tuberculous meningitis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13(10):581–598. 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Molton JS, Huggan PJ, Archuleta S: Infliximab therapy in two cases of severe neurotuberculosis paradoxical reaction. Med J Aust. 2015;202(3):156–157. 10.5694/mja14.00716 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Lee JY, Yim JJ, Yoon BW: Adjuvant interferon-γ treatment in two cases of refractory tuberculosis of the brain. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114(6):732–734. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.12.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Bruwer GE, Van der Westhuizen S, Lombard CJ, et al. : Can CT predict the level of CSF block in tuberculous hydrocephalus? Childs Nerv Syst. 2004;20(3):183–187. 10.1007/s00381-003-0887-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. van Toorn R, Solomons R: Update on the diagnosis and management of tuberculous meningitis in children. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2014;21(1):12–18. 10.1016/j.spen.2014.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Cazabon D, Alsdurf H, Satyanarayana S, et al. : Quality of tuberculosis care in high burden countries: the urgent need to address gaps in the care cascade. Int J Infect Dis. 2017;56:111–116. 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.10.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Kim J, Keshavjee S, Atun R: Health systems performance in managing tuberculosis: analysis of tuberculosis care cascades among high-burden and non-high-burden countries. J Glob Health. 2019;9(1):010423. 10.7189/jogh.09.010423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Naidoo P, Theron G, Rangaka MX, et al. : The South African Tuberculosis Care Cascade: Estimated Losses and Methodological Challenges. J Infect Dis. 2017;216(suppl_7):S702–S713. 10.1093/infdis/jix335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Parija D, Patra TK, Kumar AM, et al. : Impact of awareness drives and community-based active tuberculosis case finding in Odisha, India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;18(9):1105–1107. 10.5588/ijtld.13.0918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. He Y, Han C, Chang KF, et al. : Total delay in treatment among tuberculous meningitis patients in China: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):341. 10.1186/s12879-017-2447-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Solomons R, Grantham M, Marais BJ, et al. : IMCI indicators of childhood TBM at primary health care level in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016;20(10):1309–1313. 10.5588/ijtld.16.0062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Sheu JJ, Yuan RY, Yang CC: Predictors for outcome and treatment delay in patients with tuberculous meningitis. Am J Med Sci. 2009;338(2):134–139. 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3181a590f1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]