Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Oct 24;66:208–218. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.09.010

Tagged Cine Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Quantify Regional Mechanical Changes after Acute Myocardial Infarction

Badri Karthikeyan 1, Swati D Sonkawade 1, Saraswati Pokharel 2, Marilena Preda 3, Ferdinand Schweser 3, Robert Zivadinov 3, Minhyung Kim 4, Umesh C Sharma 1
PMCID: PMC7031039  NIHMSID: NIHMS1062548  PMID: 31668928

Abstract

Purpose:

The conventional volumetric approaches of measuring cardiac function are load-dependent, and are not able to discriminate functional changes in the infarct, transition and remote myocardium. We examined phase-dependent regional mechanical changes in the infarct, transition and remote regions after acute myocardial infarction (MI) in a preclinical mouse model using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).

Methods:

We induced acute MI in six mice with left anterior descending coronary artery ligation. We then examined cardiac (infarct, transition and remote-zone) morphology and function utilizing 9.4 T high field CMR before and 2 weeks after the induction of acute MI. Myocardial scar tissue was evaluated by using CMR with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). After determining global function through volumetric analysis, regional wall motion was evaluated by measuring wall thickening and radial velocities. Strain rate imaging was performed to assess circumferential contraction and relaxation at the myocardium, endocardium, and epicardium.

Results:

There was abnormal LGE in the anterior walls after acute MI suggesting a successful MI procedure. The transition zone consisted of a mixed signal intensity, while the remote zone contained viable myocardium. As expected, the infarct zone had demonstrated severely decreased myocardial velocities and strain rates, suggesting reduced contraction and relaxation function. Compared to pre-infarct baseline, systolic and diastolic velocities (vS and vD) were significantly reduced at the transition zone (vS: −1.86±0.16 cm/s vs −0.68±0.13 cm/s, P < 0.001. vD: 1.86±0.17 cm/s vs 0.53±0.06 cm/s, P < 0.001) and remote zone (vS: −1.86±0.16 cm/s vs −0.65±0.12 cm/s, P < 0.001. vD: 1.86±0.16 cm/s vs 0.51±0.04 cm/s, P < 0.001). Myocardial peak systolic and diastolic strain rates (SRS and SRD) were significantly lower in the transition zone (SRS: −4.2±0.3 s−1 vs −1.3±0.2 s−1, P < 0.001. SRD: 3.9±0.3 s−1 vs 1.3±0.2 s−1, P < 0.001) and remote zone (SRS: −3.8±0.3 s−1 vs −1.4±0.3 s−1; P < 0.001. SRD: 3.5±0.2 s−1 vs 1.5±0.4 s−1; P = 0.006). Endocardial and epicardial SRS and SRD were similarly reduced in the transition and remote zones compared to baseline.

Conclusions:

This study, for the first time, utilized state-of-the art high-field CMR algorithms in a preclinical mouse model for a comprehensive and controlled evaluation of the regional mechanical changes in the transition and remote zones, after acute MI. Our data demonstrate that CMR can quantitatively monitor dynamic post-MI remodeling in the transition and remote zones, thereby serving as a gold standard tool for therapeutic surveillance.

Keywords: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, myocardial infarction, left ventricular remodeling, strain imaging

1. Introduction

Although recent improvements in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (MI), such as early revascularization, have improved survival outcomes, the incidence of heart failure (HF) has increased due to progressive cardiac remodeling [1, 2]. After a sudden myocardial tissue injury has occurred, the ventricles often respond by dilating and the damaged cardiomyocytes are replaced by fibroblasts and collagen fibers [37]. The combined pathological processes of myocardial injury and repair contribute to negative long-term outcomes associated with ischemic cardiomyopathy. As a result, treatment plans that target the remodeling process and avert the loss of myocardial function arising from adverse adaptations can improve health outcomes and prevent heart failure.

Currently, the conventional therapies for adverse remodeling, including stem cell therapy, have been limited to the scar region and reducing the infarct size [8]. Unfortunately, the infarcted region consists of irreversible fibrosis and is not contractile for practical purposes. However, the adjacent and remote noninfarcted regions are increasingly being recognized as viable components of the myocardium [9]. In particular, the viable noninfarcted myocardium is an important target for monitoring therapies, as it is negatively affected by increased wall stress and higher oxygen demand arising from left ventricular dilation [10]. Understanding the impact of adverse remodeling on these regions could be crucial for improving myocardial function.

Cardiac function is commonly evaluated by using volumetric measures, such as the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) [11]. While LVEF is clinically important for the diagnosis and management of HF, this parameter provides an indirect and load-dependent evaluation of global myocardial contraction [12]. Additionally, volumetric measures are not sensitive enough to detect subtle and early changes in myocardial function. Imaging and analysis of myocardial mechanics can provide more comprehensive insights into cardiac function [13]. Myocardial mechanics can be analyzed by evaluating changes in wall motion and deformation [14]. Wall motion may be observed by measuring relative changes in myocardial wall thickness during systole and diastole. Another metric is to evaluate myocardial velocities, which offers additional information about the initial generation of contraction and relaxation forces [15]. Strain rate imaging provides more direct measurements of myocardial function by measuring regional changes in deformation. Strain can be intuitively defined by using a Lagrangian reference frame, whereby displacements are calculated at fixed material points in the myocardial tissue, with the deforming myocardium itself serving as a reference [16]. Strain rate can be measured by calculating the time derivative of strain, and thus offers useful physical insights into regional systolic and diastolic function [17, 18].

Cardiac imaging provides important quantitative examination of myocardial structure and function and can be used to characterize the adverse remodeling processes. A commonly used imaging modality is transthoracic echocardiography, due to its clinical utility and affordability. Tissue Doppler echocardiography (TDE) is useful for calculating strain from myocardial velocity gradients, but suffers from problems of geometric assumptions. While speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) also calculates strain and mitigates the problems of geometric assumptions, they struggle with inter-vendor variability [19]. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) remains a gold standard for evaluating myocardial structure and function due to its high accuracy and reproducibility. High-field CMR imaging results in higher spatial resolution due to increased signal-to-noise ratio [20]. Supplementing CMR with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) allows for the characterization of myocardial viability by distinguishing regions of scar from viable myocardium [21]. A special CMR technique called myocardial tissue tagging is useful for evaluating regional deformation by tracking movements of tags, or noninvasive markers generated from locally induced perturbations of magnetization [22, 23]. These methods help to visualize and quantify changes in regional function during the cardiac cycle and illustrate the pathophysiology behind adverse remodeling.

In this study, we carried out a comprehensive, phase-dependent analysis of myocardial function after acute MI using high-field CMR. We used LGE-CMR to quantify extent of myocardial scar and characterize post-infarct myocardial regions based on the American Heart Association (AHA) segmentation model [24]. In addition, we utilized tagged cine CMR to measure regional wall thickness, myocardial velocities, circumferential strain and strain rates in the myocardium. Moreover, we evaluated endocardial and epicardial circumferential strain and strain rates to analyze layer-specific remodeling changes in contraction and relaxation at the infarct, transition and remote regions of the left ventricle.

2. Methods

2.1. Induction of Acute Myocardial Infarction

All pre-clinical procedures and protocols conformed to institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals in research and were reviewed and approved by the University at Buffalo Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Acute myocardial infarction (MI) was induced in mice (age 14–15 weeks, C57B1/6 background, N = 6) by using our study protocol described previously [25, 26].

Mice underwent permanent ligation of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery producing an infarct in the anterior/anteroseptal walls of the LV. Concisely, mice were anesthetized with ketamine (1 mg/ kg intramuscular) and xylazine (5 mg/kg subcutaneous), and were intubated to undergo a ligation procedure (9–0 nylon) of the left anterior coronary artery. The chest wall was closed with 5–0 silk sutures, and the mice were left to recover at 30°C. To minimize discomfort, distress, and keep the pain to an absolute minimum, all studies were performed on anesthetized (1.5% of isoflurane) animals. Mice were continuously observed during procedure and for at least 1 hour into recovery. Euthanasia procedure conformed to the guidelines from the Panel on Euthanasia of the American Veterinary Medical Association. A schematic diagram of our experimental protocol is depicted in Figure 1.

Figure 1. 6-segment American Heart Association (AHA) model illustrating the induction of acute myocardial infarction for a mid-ventricular slice.

Figure 1.

The left-ventricular rotation line is rotated to mid-septum. The segment with the largest amount of scar tissue is defined as the infarct zone. The segments neighboring the infarct zone correspond to the transition zone, and the remaining three segments define the remote zone. AS = anteroseptal; AN = anterior; AL = anterolateral; IL = inferolateral; IN = inferior; IS = inferoseptal; IZ = infarct zone; TZ = transition zone; RZ = remote zone.

2.2. CMR Imaging

We used a 20 cm diameter horizontal-bore 9.4 Tesla magnet (Biospec 94/20 USR, Bruker Biospin) equipped with a gradient coil supporting 440 mT/m gradient strength and 3440 T/m/s maximum linear slew rate (BGA-12S HP; Bruker Biospin). The scanner was operated with ParaVision (version 6.0.1; Bruker Biospin). We employed a cross-coil configuration with a 2×2-channels mouse cardiac signal reception-coil suitable for mouse cardiac studies (Bruker Biospin, T20028V3). We used generic, larger volume (86 mm) circular polarized coil for the signal transmission. We induced anesthesia with 3–4% isoflurane in 1 l/min of 100% medical-grade oxygen and maintained it during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with 1–3% isoflurane. We placed a tail-vein catheter (shortened to 20ul dead volume; SAI Infusion Technologies) attached to a 300 μl insulin syringe via blunt needle filled with 2μl/g body weight of 0.15M solution of Gadavist (Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.). Once mice were placed on the MRI animal bed, respiration rate, heart rate, arterial oxygen saturation, and body temperature were monitored continuously with an SPO2-sensor attached to the animal’s tail, a respiration pillow, and a rectal temperature probe (Model 1025, SA Instruments, Stony Brook, NY), respectively. The isoflurane concentration and the temperature of an integrated warm water bath in the animal bed (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) were regulated to keep the respiration rate around 35–40 breaths/minute and the core body temperature between 35.5 and 36°C. A series of three orthogonal gradient echo (GRE) scout images of the heart was acquired. For the tagged images, we acquired ECG and respiration-gated axial views of the heart in cine mode with 2D SPAMM tagging (0.1mm thickness; 0.5mm grid distance) using a single-slice fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence with the following parameters: 2ms Gaussian pulse for slice selection; 30° flip angle; TE/TR=2.2/15ms; 50kHz readout bandwidth; fat suppression; 1mm slice thickness; 30×30mm2 field of view; 256×256 matrix; 8 averages; 8 cardiac movie frames. The scan time was between 10 and 15 minutes, depending on respiration and heart rate.

For the LGE-CMR, we discharged the syringe and acquired late contrast enhancement data at 20 minutes after the injection using an ECG and respiration-gated inversion-recovery T1-weighted FLASH sequence with the following parameters: 60° flip angle; TE/TR=2.1/1200ms; 65kHz readout bandwidth; TI=200ms; 8 axial slices with 0.8mm thickness and 0.2mm gap; 25×25mm2 field of view; 256×256 matrix; no averages. The scan time was between 3 and 5 minutes, depending on respiration and heart rate. CMR images were taken both before and after the MI induction procedure (median time = 2 weeks), which were denoted as pre-MI and post-MI images respectively.

2.3. Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function

Quantification of left ventricular (LV) volumes and function was made by using the freely available software Segment version 2.2 R6901 (http://segment.heiberg.se) [27]. The endocardial and epicardial borders were first identified by using short-axis cine images obtained at the level of mid-papillary muscles. With the mid-septum as a reference rotation point, the average radii and diameters were measured by using 6 different myocardial segments (anterior, anteroseptal, inferoseptal, inferior, inferolateral, anterolateral). By approximating each slice as a disc, volumes were calculated by the following formula:

volume=π4(diameter)2slicethickness

A volume vs time axis was plotted over 8–10 time increments of the cardiac cycle to generate an LV volume curve, which served as a reference to define the end systole and end diastole. Diameters and volumes were used to calculate the fractional shortening and ejection fraction for a mid-ventricular slice.

2.4. Myocardial Viability Analysis

Myocardial viability was evaluated by using short-axis late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) CMR images. After manually drawing the endocardial and epicardial borders, Segment was used to quantify myocardial scar, which is defined to consist of both the infarct core and peri-infarct zone, by using an EWA algorithm (Expectation maximization, Weighted intensity, A priori information) [28]. The EWA algorithm combines an intensity threshold determined by an expectation maximization algorithm with a pixel intensity weighted summation that accounts for partial volume effects. This algorithm also uses a priori information from coronary artery territory to aid with the automatic quantification of myocardial scar. Myocardial scar extent was assessed by using a “scar transmurality area based” (STAB) method, which is based on calculating the fraction of the surface area of a myocardial segment comprising the scar, as defined by the following formula: [29]

scareextent=areascarsegmentarea

Myocardial scar was then measured for all six myocardial segments, with the mid-septum serving as a reference rotation point, and datasets were exported for quantitative analyses [30]. The myocardial segment with the largest amount of scar was defined to be the infarct zone. The neighboring segments containing any amount of scar were defined to be the transition zone, while the remaining segments with no scar represented the remote zone.

2.5. Regional Wall Motion Analysis

We used Segment to quantify the amount of regional thickening in the ventricular walls. Contours were manually drawn at the endocardial and epicardial borders using short-axis cine images obtained at the level of mid-papillary muscles. With the mid-septum serving as a reference rotation point, the average wall thickness was measured using 6 different myocardial segments. After exporting the datasets, quantitative analyses for the wall thickness (mm) were performed at end systole (WTS) and end diastole (WTD). Additional wall thickness parameters were calculated as follows:

WallThickening(ΔWT)=WTSWTD
FractionalWallThickening(FWT)=WTSWTDWTD=ΔWTWTD

We also examined time-dependent changes in the generation of contractile and relaxation forces by measuring myocardial radial velocities over 6 myocardial segments, with the mid-septum serving as a reference rotation point [15]. The methodology was optimized by comparing the velocity mapping algorithm with a study that measured average systolic radial velocities by Doppler echocardiogram in adult male rats [31]. Quantitative analyses for the radial velocity (cm/s) were performed at end systole (vS) and end diastole (vD), which corresponds to the initial generation of contractile and relaxation forces respectively.

2.6. Strain Analysis

Based on the principles of finite strain theory, myocyte contraction was examined by using a one-dimensional Lagrangian strain (ε) along the circumferential direction, which is defined by the following formula [23, 32, 33]:

ε=LL0L0

Where L is the length of a myocardial segment and L0 is the original length at end diastole.

Strain rate (SR) is defined as the time derivative of strain, which is calculated by dividing the change in strain between the two time frames (t1 and t2) by the time difference [23, 32, 33].

SR=dt=ε(t2)ε(t1)t2t1

Myocardial strain was measured by using the commercially available Segment strain analysis module, which utilizes a tracking algorithm based on non-rigid image registration [3436]. To help optimize the strain tracking algorithm, the systolic circumferential strains from pre-MI images were compared with the normal values obtained from previous CMR tagging studies [37, 38]. Myocardial circumferential strain was measured by manually drawing the endocardial and epicardial borders at end diastole, from which the software propagated the contours automatically. Endocardial and epicardial circumferential strains were similarly measured by redrawing the contours at endocardial and epicardial regions of interest respectively and repeating the strain tracking. The quality of strain tracking was improved by manually adjusting the initial contour of the end-diastolic image and propagating again throughout the cardiac cycle. Interpolation curves were produced by averaging individual strain data together through an in-house program written in MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA). Quantitative analyses for the circumferential strain (%) were performed at end systole (εS), while quantitative analyses for the strain rate (1/s or s−1) were done at peak systole (SRS) and peak diastole (SRD), which correspond to the two peaks seen in the individual strain rate curves respectively.

2.7. Statistical Analyses

Quantitative parameters were summarized by group using the mean and standard error of the mean (SEM). Quantitative regional comparisons were made using unpaired Student’s t tests. All tests were 2 sided and P < 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Assessment of Left Ventricular Function

Two weeks after the induction procedure, acute MI resulted in dilation of the left ventricle throughout the cardiac cycle. Significant increases in the diameters were observed at end systole (baseline, 2.3±0.1 mm; acute MI, 5.0±0.4 mm, P < 0.001) and end diastole (baseline, 4.0±0.1 mm; acute MI, 5.5±0.3 mm, P = 0.007). Consequently, LV fractional shortening was significantly reduced (baseline, 43±3%; acute MI, 10±2%, P < 0.001). Acute MI also led to significantly higher LV volumes at end systole (baseline, 4.3±0.5 mm3; acute MI, 20.1±2.7 mm3, P = 0.002) and end diastole (baseline, 12.7±0.4 mm3; acute MI, 24.1±2.7 mm3, P = 0.009). Subsequently, acute MI resulted in significantly lower stroke volumes (baseline, 8.5±0.3 mm3; acute MI, 4.0±0.4 mm3, P < 0.001). LV ejection fraction for a mid-ventricular slice was significantly reduced after acute MI (baseline, 67±3%; acute MI, 18±3%, P < 0.001).

3.2. Myocardial Viability and Scar Quantification

Acute MI led to regional changes in myocardial structure and morphology due to the presence of myocardial scarring. Representative tagged CMR images depicting acute MI at systole and diastole are shown respectively in (Figure 2A and B). A representative LGE image illustrating myocardial scar is provided in (Figure 2C). The anterior wall represented the infarct zone, whereby about 95±1% of the region contained myocardial scarring. The transition zone consisted of the anteroseptal and anterolateral walls, in which myocardial scar spanned about 39 ± 5% of the region (P < 0.001 vs infarct). The remaining regions that had no scar constituted the remote zone (P < 0.001 vs infarct and P < 0.001 vs transition) (Figure 2D).

Figure 2. Assessment of myocardial scar using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).

Figure 2.

A-B, Representative short-axis tagged images illustrating myocardial infarction. A, End systole. B, End diastole. C, Representative short-axis late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) CMR image with scar regions highlighted; red areas indicate the infarct core; and yellow areas depict the gray (peri-infarct) zone; D, Quantification of myocardial scar in infarct, transition and remote zones. Data are represented in terms of mean ± SEM (standard error of the mean). *Indicates p < 0.001 when compared to infarct zone, and # indicates p < 0.001 when compared to transition zones, N = 6.

3.3. Regional Analysis of Myocardial Wall Motion

3.3.1. Infarct Zone

When compared to pre-infarct measurements, the infarct zone had significantly lower systolic (baseline, 1.46±0.09 mm; infarct, 0.56±0.09 mm, P < 0.001) and diastolic (baseline, 0.74±0.07 mm; infarct, 0.46±0.05 mm, P = 0.009) wall thickness (Figure 3A and B). The infarct zone also experienced significant reductions in both the wall thickening (baseline, 0.72±0.07 mm; infarct, 0.10±0.07 mm, P < 0.001) and fractional wall thickening (baseline, 103±15%; infarct, 25±16%, P = 0.005) (Figure 3C and D). Moreover, systolic and diastolic velocities were lower in the infarct zone compared to pre-infarct measurements (systolic velocities: baseline, −1.86±0.15 cm/s; infarct, −0.61±0.12 cm/s, P < 0.001; and diastolic velocities: baseline, 1.89±0.15 cm/s; infarct, 0.46±0.04 cm/s, P < 0.001) (Figure 4A and B).

Figure 3. Comparison of regional variation in wall thickness parameters before (Pre-MI) and after (Post-MI) the induction of acute myocardial infarction.

Figure 3.

A, Bar diagrams comparing wall thickness at end systole; B, wall thickness at end diastole; C, wall thickening; D, fractional wall thickening. Data are represented in terms of mean ± SEM (standard error of the mean). *Indicates p < 0.05 when comparing Post-MI to Pre-MI, N = 6.

Figure 4. Analysis of regional variation in radial velocities before (Pre-MI) and after (Post-MI) the induction of acute myocardial infarction.

Figure 4.

A, Bar diagrams comparing end-systolic radial velocities, which are shown in the negative axis due to cardiomyocyte shortening (contraction); B, end-diastolic radial velocities, which are shown in the positive axis due to cardiomyocyte lengthening (relaxation). Data are represented in terms of mean ± SEM (standard error of the mean). *Indicates p < 0.05 when comparing Post-MI to Pre-MI, N = 6.

3.3.2. Transition Zone

Compared to pre-infarct measurements, the transition zone had significantly reduced systolic (baseline, 1.47±0.09 mm; transition, 0.70±0.06 mm, P < 0.001) and diastolic (baseline, 0.75±0.05 mm; transition, 0.60±0.03 mm, P = 0.040) wall thickness (Figure 3A and B). In addition to reduced wall thickening (baseline, 0.73±0.04 mm; transition, 0.11±0.05 mm, P < 0.001), the transition zone showed significantly lower fractional wall thickening (baseline, 99±5%; transition, 19±9%, P < 0.001) (Figure 3C and D). Both systolic and diastolic velocities were reduced in the transitional zone compared to pre-infarct measurements (systolic velocities: baseline, −1.86±0.16 cm/s; transition, −0.68±0.13 cm/s, P < 0.001; and diastolic velocities: baseline, 1.86±0.17 cm/s; transition, 0.53±0.06 cm/s, P < 0.001) (Figure 4A and B).

3.3.3. Remote Zone

The remote zone had significantly decreased systolic wall thickness compared to pre-infarct measurements (baseline, 1.41±0.10 mm; remote, 0.94±0.09 mm, P = 0.005) (Figure 3A). However, no significant differences in the diastolic wall thickness were observed (baseline, 0.70±0.03 mm; remote, 0.79±0.09 mm, P = 0.362) (Figure 3B). In addition to decreased wall thickening (baseline, 0.71±0.09 mm; remote, 0.14±0.03 mm, P = 0.001), the remote zone displayed significantly lower fractional wall thickening (baseline, 104±15%; remote, 20±4%, P = 0.002) (Figure 3C and D). Furthermore, compared to pre-infarct measurements, both the systolic and diastolic velocities were significantly reduced in the remote zone (systolic velocities: baseline, −1.86±0.16 cm/s; remote, −0.65±0.12 cm/s, P < 0.001; diastolic velocities: baseline, 1.86±0.16 cm/s; remote, 0.51±0.04 cm/s, P < 0.001) (Figure 4A and B).

3.4. Strain Analysis of Myocardial Deformation

3.4.1. Temporal Changes

Representative tagged CMR images illustrating myocardial strain imaging are provided in Figure 5. Temporal changes in cardiomyocyte contraction were observed by measuring changes in circumferential strain and strain rate throughout a cardiac cycle. In pre-infarct hearts, circumferential strain uniformly decreased until it reached the negative peak strain, which corresponded to maximal circumferential shortening that occurred at systole (Figure 6A). However, acute MI resulted in the infarct and transition zones initially having positive circumferential strains at late diastole before becoming negative and reaching the peak strain. The remote zone initially remained near zero before decreasing to peak strain. For these regions, the peak strain occurred after systole (Figure 6B). Circumferential strain rates for pre-infarct hearts uniformly decreased to SRS, after which they consistently increased to SRD (Figure 6C). In acute MI, the circumferential strain rate initially increased in infarct, transition and remote zones, with the strain rate in infarct zone approaching close to zero, before decreasing to SRS. The circumferential strain rates for these regions increased to SRD, but the rate of increase was least uniform in the infarct zone. Additionally, while acute MI did not affect the time when SRS occurred, SRD occurred at a time closer to end diastole than in baseline (Figure 6D).

Figure 5. Strain visualization of the induction of acute myocardial infarction (MI) using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) with tissue tagging.

Figure 5.

A-B, Representative short-axis tagged images before MI induction. A, End systole. B, End diastole. C-D, Representative short-axis tagged images after MI induction. C, End systole. D, End diastole.

Figure 6. Strain curves illustrating regional changes in circumferential strain and strain rate over the course of a cardiac cycle.

Figure 6.

Strain curves were produced by averaging the strain values measured at each time point. A-B, circumferential strain curves before and after myocardial infarction. The minimal point is the peak strain; A, peak strain is located at end systole; B, peak strain occurs after end systole, suggesting asynchronous contractions; C-D, circumferential strain rate curves before and after myocardial infarction. The minimal point is the peak systolic strain rate, while the maximal point is the peak diastolic strain rate.

3.4.2. Infarct Zone

Compared to pre-infarct measurements, the infarct zone had significantly lower myocardial εS (baseline, −15.5±1.2%; infarct, −1.5±0.5%, P < 0.001) (Figure 7A). Additionally, the infarct zone experienced significantly reduced myocardial SRS (baseline, −4.0±0.4 s−1; infarct, −0.5±0.1 s−1, P < 0.001) and myocardial SRD (baseline, 4.1±0.4 s−1; infarct, 0.6±0.2 s−1, P < 0.001) (Figure 7B and C).

Figure 7. Analysis of regional variation in circumferential strain and strain rates in the myocardium before (Pre-MI) and after (Post-MI) the induction of acute myocardial infarction.

Figure 7.

A-C, bar diagrams measuring peak strain and strain rate parameters, which are found by averaging the peak values for individual strain curves. Peak systolic strains are shown in negative axis because of circumferential shortening (contraction). peak diastolic strain is shown in positive axis because of circumferential lengthening (relaxation); A, peak systolic myocardial strain; B, peak systolic myocardial strain rate; C, peak diastolic myocardial strain rate. Data are represented in terms of mean ± SEM (standard error of the mean). *Indicates p < 0.05 when comparing Post-MI to Pre-MI, N = 6.

3.4.3. Transition Zone

The transition zone had significantly reduced myocardial εS compared to pre-infarct measurements (baseline, −16.3±0.5%; transition, −4.5±0.8%, P < 0.001) (Figure 7A). In addition, the transition zone displayed significantly decreased myocardial SRS (baseline, −4.2±0.3 s−1; transition, −1.3±0.2 s−1, P < 0.001) and myocardial SRD (baseline, 3.9±0.3 s−1; transition, 1.3±0.2 s−1, P < 0.001) (Figure 7B and C).

3.4.4. Remote Zone

When compared to pre-infarct measurements, the remote zone had significantly reduced myocardial εS (baseline, −14.5±0.4%; remote, −5.5±1.4%, P < 0.001) (Figure 7A). Moreover, the remote zone had significantly lower myocardial SRS (baseline, −3.8±0.3 s−1; remote, −1.4±0.3 s−1, P < 0.001) and myocardial SRD (baseline, 3.5±0.2 s−1; remote, 1.5±0.4 s−1, P = 0.006) (Figure 7B and C).

3.5. Strain Analysis of Endocardial and Epicardial Deformation

3.5.1. Infarct Zone

Compared to pre-infarct measurements, the infarct zone had significantly reduced endocardial εS (baseline, −26.5±1.9%; infarct, −3.1±0.8%, P < 0.001) (Figure 8A). Additionally, the infarct zone experienced significantly lower endocardial SRS (baseline, −6.7±0.6 s−1; infarct, −0.9±0.2 s−1, P < 0.001) and endocardial SRD (baseline, 6.7±0.6 s−1; infarct, 1.1±0.2 s−1, P < 0.001) (Figure 8B and C). Similarly, the infarct zone had significantly reduced epicardial εS compared to pre-infarct measurements (baseline, −5.6±0.5%; infarct, −0.6±0.4%, P < 0.001) (Figure 8D). Moreover, significant decreases in both the epicardial SRS (baseline, −1.5±0.2 s−1; infarct, −0.2±0.1 s−1, P < 0.001) and epicardial SRD (baseline, 1.5±0.1 s−1; infarct, 0.3±0.1 s−1, P < 0.001) were observed in the infarct zone (Figure 8E and F).

Figure 8. Assessment of regional variation in circumferential strain and strain rates in the endocardium and epicardium before (Pre-MI) and after (Post-MI) the induction of acute myocardial infarction.

Figure 8.

A-F, bar diagrams measuring peak strain and strain rate parameters. Peak systolic strains are shown in negative axis due to circumferential shortening (contraction). peak diastolic strain is shown in positive axis due to circumferential lengthening (relaxation); A, peak systolic endocardial strain; B, peak systolic endocardial strain rate; C, peak diastolic endocardial strain rate; D, peak systolic epicardial strain; E, peak systolic epicardial strain rate; F, peak diastolic epicardial strain rate. Data are represented in terms of mean ± SEM (standard error of the mean). *Indicates p < 0.05 when comparing Post-MI to Pre-MI, N = 6.

3.5.2. Transition Zone

The transition zone had significantly lower endocardial εS compared to pre-infarct measurements (baseline, −24.0±0.8%; transition, −4.6±1.1%, P < 0.001) (Figure 8A). In addition, the transition zone had significantly reduced endocardial SRS (baseline, −6.2±0.5 s−1; transition, −1.3±0.3 s−1, P < 0.001) and endocardial SRD (baseline, 5.8±0.4 s−1; transition, 1.4±0.3 s−1, P < 0.001) (Figure 8B and C). When compared to pre-infarct measurements, the transition zone had significantly lower epicardial εS (baseline, −10.2±0.8%; transition, −4.9±0.6%, P < 0.001) (Figure 8D). Furthermore, the transition zone experienced significant reductions in both the epicardial SRS (baseline, −2.6±0.2 s−1; transition, −1.3±0.2 s−1, P < 0.001) and epicardial SRD (baseline, 2.3±0.3 s−1; transition, 1.3±0.2 s−1, P = 0.031)(Figure 8E and F).

3.5.3. Remote Zone

When compared to pre-infarct measurements, the remote zone had significantly decreased endocardial εS (baseline, −22.2±1.0%; remote, −7.9±1.8%, P < 0.001) (Figure 8A). The remote zone also had significant reductions in both the endocardial SRS (baseline, −5.7±0.5 s−1; remote, −1.9±0.3 s−1, P < 0.001) and endocardial SRD (baseline, 5.4±0.3 s−1; remote, 2.2±0.6 s−1, P = 0.001) (Figure 8B and C). Likewise, epicardial εS was significantly lower in the remote zone compared to pre-infarct measurements (baseline, −7.9±0.4%; remote, −3.2±1.0%, P = 0.003) (Figure 8D). Additionally, the remote zone had significantly reduced epicardial SRS (baseline, −2.2±0.1 s−1; remote, −0.9±0.2 s−1, P < 0.001) and epicardial SRD (baseline, 1.9±0.1 s−1; remote, 0.9±0.3 s−1, P = 0.031) (Figure 8E and F).

4. Discussion

Adverse remodeling is characterized by spatially heterogeneous changes in myocardial structure and function. Previous studies using tagged CMR compared between healthy volunteers and MI patients to suggest reduced contractility in the noninfarcted myocardium, which contributed to loss of left ventricular function [39, 40]. However, there are limited CMR studies that examined regional differences in strain and strain rate during the cardiac cycle and across cardiac layers. Additionally, novel parameters such as myocardial velocities provide important insights regarding the regional differences in the initial generation of contractile forces [15]. Our study utilized state-of-the-art, high-field CMR algorithms to comprehensively examine the regional and layer-specific mechanical changes involved in adverse remodeling. In particular, our study illustrated that although the infarct zone consisted of significantly abnormal late gadolinium enhancement suggesting of myocardial scarring, the neighboring transition and remote zones still experienced significantly reduced myocardial contraction and relaxation. Moreover, significant decreases in the endocardial and epicardial deformation were observed, indicating that the MI extended from the endocardium to the epicardium. As such, our study demonstrated that the transition and remote zones, which are viable but have reduced contractile function, could serve as important regions for monitoring therapies.

Recent studies have utilized high-field CMR algorithms to characterize the pathophysiological changes arising from myocardial infarction. In one study, Yla-Herttuala and colleagues used a rotating frame relaxation time mapping and 9.4 T CMR imaging to produce T and TRAFF2 relaxation time maps, which could accurately assess the infarct regions without the need for gadolinium contrast agents [41]. Lohöfer and colleagues combined 7 T CMR imaging with mass spectrometry imaging and Gadofluorine P validation to provide a better quantification of scar formation and extracellular matrix deposition in the infarct regions [42]. Both studies have offered useful and insightful techniques for assessing the infarct regions, which complement the conventional LGE-CMR analysis that we used for evaluating myocardial scar extent. However, these studies focused primarily on infarct size quantification and provided limited information regarding myocardial function. Our study utilized 9.4 T tagged CMR imaging to quantify regional function in the infarct, transition and remote zones. Similar to the infarct zone, the transition and remote zones, which contain viable myocardium, have reduced myocardial velocities, circumferential strain and strain rates.

CMR provides a thorough evaluation of structural and functional changes occurring in adverse remodeling, while also offering strong spatial resolution and high reproducibility. Increasing the magnetic field strength of CMR imaging improves the signal-to-noise ratio and enhances the spatial resolution. However, higher magnetic field strengths also contribute to greater susceptibility to artifacts, so the ideal range for preclinical imaging in mice is 7–11.7 T [20, 43]. Consequently, 9.4 T CMR imaging offers high quality characterization of myocardial structure and function that would be helpful in understanding the remodeling process. CMR with LGE uses extracellular gadolinium contrast agents to highlight regions of myocardial scar tissue by quantifying signal enhancement. In acute MI, the cellular necrosis in damaged cardiomyocytes disrupts the cell membranes, allowing for an increased gadolinium distribution and enhancing the scar region. LGE-CMR imaging allows for scar quantification by providing a reasonably accurate assessment of acute MI, as regions of greatest signal enhancement can reliably correspond to largest amount of myocardial scarring [21].

Tagged cine CMR imaging offers useful insights into regional myocardial function during remodeling by examining changes in contractile and relaxation properties [37]. Although volumetric methods offer important information regarding global LV function, metrics quantifying myocardial wall motion and deformation are more accurate and insightful for evaluating regional contractility [44, 45]. Wall thickness provides important information by highlighting regions of thinning, which are susceptible to increased wall stress [46]. Myocardial velocities offer useful information regarding the initial generation of contractile and relaxation forces, which are related to myocardial geometry, elasticity and fiber structure that can be affected by adverse remodeling [15, 47, 48]. Additionally, Lagrangian circumferential strains provide intuitive insights of myocardial contractility, since they utilize the deforming myocardium itself as a reference to examine regional changes in circumferential shortening across the cardiac cycle [16, 32]. Strain rate measures the rate at which these deformations occur, and parameters such as SRS and SRD provide reasonable noninvasive measures of regional contraction and relaxation respectively [17, 18, 49].

Post-infarct adverse remodeling is commonly characterized by infarct expansion, which occurs within hours of cardiomyocyte injury and contributes to regional wall thinning, increased wall stress and ventricular dilation [50, 51]. From LGE-CMR imaging, the infarct zone consisted of the anterior wall that had the strongest signal enhancement, which suggested significant myocardial scarring. In our study, the infarct zone was markedly thin and least contractile, thus acting as a passive segment. From diastole to late diastole, the infarct zone displayed dyskinetic motion by circumferentially bulging outwards. Given the minimal contraction of the infarct zone, the dyskinetic motion could be attributed to tethering effects, whereby the adjacent transition zone might have transferred strain to the infarct zone resulting in its contraction [52, 53]. After late diastole, the infarct zone showed reduced shortening for the remaining of the cardiac cycle.

The transition zone consists of the two myocardial walls that border the infarct zone and serves as an intermediate region between the infarct zone and remote zone. This region contains the peri-infarct zone, which is characterized by having an intermediate CMR intensity level that corresponds to a region containing a mixture of viable and non-viable cells and being a predictor of post-MI mortality [54, 55]. From LGE-CMR imaging, the transition zone consisted of the anteroseptal and anterolateral walls that had moderate signal enhancement, which indicated intermediate levels of myocardial scarring. The transition zone had reduced wall thickening and lower contractile and relaxation velocities. From diastole to late diastole, the transition zone displayed dyskinetic motion by circumferentially bulging outwards. The pathological mechanism could be attributed to tethering effects that operated in a bidirectional manner between the infarct zone and transition zone [52, 53]. The strain transfer from the transition zone to the infarct zone might have resulted in the infarct zone having a temporary reaction force that pulled the transition zone outwards initially. Since the transition zone still had contractile function, the initial bulging lasted for a shorter time compared to that of the infarct zone. After late diastole, the transition zone experienced reduced shortening for the remaining of the cardiac cycle.

The remote zone contains the viable myocardium that is distant from the infarct zone. From LGE-CMR imaging, the remote zone consisted of the inferior, inferoseptal and inferolateral walls that contained no scarring and lacked signal enhancement. However, while myocardial scarring was not apparent, the remote zone showed different mechanical properties than expected for a healthy myocardium. The remote zone had reduced wall thickening and lower contractile and relaxation velocities. The remote zone also demonstrated hypokinetic motion throughout the cardiac cycle, but the during the time from diastole to late diastole, the remote zone’s motion was approximately akinetic. It is possible that adverse remodeling in the infarct zone might have spilled over throughout the myocardium and contributed to reduced contraction in remote zone [53].

The adverse remodeling processes affecting the myocardium also contributed to pathological changes in the endocardium and epicardium. Circumferential strain normally increases from the epicardium to the endocardium [23, 56]. This trend was observed in the infarct zone and remote zone but it was markedly reduced in the transition zone. The consistent reductions in endocardial strain and strain rates across the infarct, transition and remote zones could be explained by the susceptibility of the endocardium to ischemia. However, similar reductions in strain and strain rate were also observed in the epicardium. This suggested that MI operated through a “wavefront phenomenon” whereby the necrosis spread from the endocardium towards the epicardium, which occurred when the coronary occlusion was prolonged [53, 57]. As such, the adverse remodeling process likely contributed to significant mechanical changes that had occurred throughout the left ventricle wall.

A significant limitation to this study is that short-axis CMR images were taken for only the mid-ventricular slice. Having additional slices and performing long-axis imaging would provide more comprehensive insights into the regional variation of mechanical function, allow for an accurate calculation of the ejection fraction, and offer additional data regarding longitudinal strain, twisting and torsion. Another limitation is low temporal resolution of CMR imaging. CMR images were taken on average of 8–10 timeframes, which might affect the accuracy of strain rates. Moreover, only circumferential strain was calculated, as the small number of tags spanning along the myocardial wall led to imprecise and inaccurate measurements of radial strain. Instead, wall thickening parameters were used to quantify wall motion in the radial direction. The fading of myocardial tags near the epicardial border contributed to variation in the epicardial circumferential strain and strain rates.

5. Conclusion

Our study showed that adverse cardiac remodeling resulted in significant changes in mechanical function in the transition and remote zones. Additional translational studies exploring these changes will provide useful clinical insights into the remodeling process and guide the development of new therapeutic strategies.

Funding Sources:

This research was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (award number UL1TR001412) to the University at Buffalo. Dr. Sharma is supported by Mentored Career Development Award from the NIH/NHLBI 5 K08 HL131987-02. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Abbreviations

CMR

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance

EF

Ejection fraction

HF

Heart failure

LGE

Late gadolinium enhancement

LV

Left ventricle

MI

Myocardial infarction

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: None

References

  • [1].Guidry UC, Evans JC, Larson MG, Wilson PW, Murabito JM, Levy D. Temporal trends in event rates after Q-wave myocardial infarction: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 1999;100(20):2054–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Steg PG, Dabbous OH, Feldman LJ, Cohen-Solal A, Aumont MC, Lopez-Sendon J, et al. Determinants and prognostic impact of heart failure complicating acute coronary syndromes: observations from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Circulation 2004;109(4):494–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Cleutjens JP, Verluyten MJ, Smiths JF, Daemen MJ. Collagen remodeling after myocardial infarction in the rat heart. The American journal of pathology 1995;147(2):325–38. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Cleutjens JP, Blankesteijn WM, Daemen MJ, Smits JF. The infarcted myocardium: simply dead tissue, or a lively target for therapeutic interventions. Cardiovascular research 1999;44(2):232–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Yang F, Liu YH, Yang XP, Xu J, Kapke A, Carretero OA. Myocardial infarction and cardiac remodelling in mice. Experimental physiology 2002;87(5):547–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Weber KT, Sun Y, Diez J. Fibrosis: a living tissue and the infarcted heart. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2008;52(24):2029–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Daskalopoulos EP, Janssen BJ, Blankesteijn WM. Myofibroblasts in the infarct area: concepts and challenges. Microscopy and microanalysis : the official journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada 2012;18(1):35–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Otto Beitnes J, Oie E, Shahdadfar A, Karlsen T, Muller RM, Aakhus S, et al. Intramyocardial injections of human mesenchymal stem cells following acute myocardial infarction modulate scar formation and improve left ventricular function. Cell Transplant 2012;21(8):1697–709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Bromage DI, Pickard JM, Rossello X, Ziff OJ, Burke N, Yellon DM, et al. Remote ischaemic conditioning reduces infarct size in animal in vivo models of ischaemia-reperfusion injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Res 2017;113(3):288–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Gajarsa JJ, Kloner RA. Left ventricular remodeling in the post-infarction heart: a review of cellular, molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic modalities. Heart failure reviews 2011;16(1):13–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Driessen MM, Kort E, Cramer MJ, Doevendans PA, Angevaare MJ, Leiner T, et al. Assessment of LV ejection fraction using real-time 3D echocardiography in daily practice: direct comparison of the volumetric and speckle tracking methodologies to CMR. Neth Heart J 2014;22(9):383–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Grapsa J. Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Global Longitudinal Strain: Prognostic When Not Load Dependent? J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72(9):1065–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Modesto K, Sengupta PP. Myocardial mechanics in cardiomyopathies. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2014;57(1):111–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Huttin O, Zhang L, Lemarie J, Mandry D, Juilliere Y, Lemoine S, et al. Global and regional myocardial deformation mechanics of microvascular obstruction in acute myocardial infarction: a three dimensional speckle-tracking imaging study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;31(7):1337–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Sharma UC, Sonkawade SD, Spernyak JA, Sexton S, Nguyen J, Dahal S, et al. A Small Peptide Ac-SDKP Inhibits Radiation-Induced Cardiomyopathy. Circulation Heart failure 2018;11(8):e004867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Simpson RM, Keegan J, Firmin DN. MR assessment of regional myocardial mechanics. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI 2013;37(3):576–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Greenberg NL, Firstenberg MS, Castro PL, Main M, Travaglini A, Odabashian JA, et al. Doppler-derived myocardial systolic strain rate is a strong index of left ventricular contractility. Circulation 2002;105(1):99–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Edvardsen T, Rosen BD, Pan L, Jerosch-Herold M, Lai S, Hundley WG, et al. Regional diastolic dysfunction in individuals with left ventricular hypertrophy measured by tagged magnetic resonance imaging--the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). American heart journal 2006;151(1):109–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Smiseth OA, Torp H, Opdahl A, Haugaa KH, Urheim S. Myocardial strain imaging: how useful is it in clinical decision making? European heart journal 2016;37(15):1196–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Lindsey ML, Kassiri Z, Virag JAI, de Castro Brás LE, Scherrer-Crosbie M. Guidelines for measuring cardiac physiology in mice. American journal of physiology Heart and circulatory physiology 2018;314(4):H733–H52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Arai AE. The cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) approach to assessing myocardial viability. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology 2011;18(6):1095–102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Zerhouni EA, Parish DM, Rogers WJ, Yang A, Shapiro EP. Human heart: tagging with MR imaging--a method for noninvasive assessment of myocardial motion. Radiology 1988;169(1):59–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Shehata ML, Cheng S, Osman NF, Bluemke DA, Lima JA. Myocardial tissue tagging with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2009;11:55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105(4):539–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Mosleh W, Chaudhari MR, Sonkawade S, Mahajan S, Khalil C, Frodey K, et al. The Therapeutic Potential of Blocking Galectin-3 Expression in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Mitigating Inflammation of Infarct Region: A Clinical Outcome-Based Translational Study. Biomarker insights 2018;13:1177271918771969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Aartsen WM, Schuijt MP, Danser AH, Daemen MJ, Smits JF. The role of locally expressed angiotensin converting enzyme in cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction in mice. Cardiovascular research 2002;56(2):205–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Heiberg E, Sjogren J, Ugander M, Carlsson M, Engblom H, Arheden H. Design and validation of Segment--freely available software for cardiovascular image analysis. BMC medical imaging 2010;10:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Engblom H, Tufvesson J, Jablonowski R, Carlsson M, Aletras AH, Hoffmann P, et al. A new automatic algorithm for quantification of myocardial infarction imaged by late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance: experimental validation and comparison to expert delineations in multi-center, multi-vendor patient data. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2016;18(1):27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Alexandre J, Saloux E, Dugue AE, Lebon A, Lemaitre A, Roule V, et al. Scar extent evaluated by late gadolinium enhancement CMR: a powerful predictor of long term appropriate ICD therapy in patients with coronary artery disease. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013;15:12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Cain PA, Ugander M, Palmer J, Carlsson M, Heiberg E, Arheden H. Quantitative polar representation of left ventricular myocardial perfusion, function and viability using SPECT and cardiac magnetic resonance: initial results. Clinical physiology and functional imaging 2005;25(4):215–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Weytjens C, Cosyns B, D’Hooge J, Gallez C, Droogmans S, Lahoute T, et al. Doppler myocardial imaging in adult male rats: reference values and reproducibility of velocity and deformation parameters. European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology 2006;7(6):411–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Gotte MJ, Germans T, Russel IK, Zwanenburg JJ, Marcus JT, van Rossum AC, et al. Myocardial strain and torsion quantified by cardiovascular magnetic resonance tissue tagging: studies in normal and impaired left ventricular function. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2006;48(10):2002–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Pedrizzetti G, Claus P, Kilner PJ, Nagel E. Principles of cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking and echocardiographic speckle tracking for informed clinical use. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2016;18(1):51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Heyde B, Jasaityte R, Barbosa D, Robesyn V, Bouchez S, Wouters P, et al. Elastic image registration versus speckle tracking for 2-D myocardial motion estimation: a direct comparison in vivo. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 2013;32(2):449–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Morais P, Heyde B, Barbosa D, Queirós S, Claus P, D’hooge J. Cardiac Motion and Deformation Estimation from Tagged MRI Sequences Using a Temporal Coherent Image Registration Framework. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013:316–24. [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Morais P, Marchi A, Bogaert JA, Dresselaers T, Heyde B, D’Hooge J, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking using a non-rigid, elastic image registration algorithm: assessment of variability in a real-life clinical setting. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2017;19(1):24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Zhong J, Liu W, Yu X. Characterization of three-dimensional myocardial deformation in the mouse heart: an MR tagging study. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI 2008;27(6):1263–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Zhong J, Liu W, Yu X. Transmural myocardial strain in mouse: quantification of high-resolution MR tagging using harmonic phase (HARP) analysis. Magnetic resonance in medicine 2009;61(6):1368–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Kramer CM, Rogers WJ, Theobald TM, Power TP, Petruolo S, Reichek N. Remote noninfarcted region dysfunction soon after first anterior myocardial infarction. A magnetic resonance tagging study. Circulation 1996;94(4):660–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Bogaert J, Bosmans H, Maes A, Suetens P, Marchal G, Rademakers FE. Remote myocardial dysfunction after acute anterior myocardial infarction: impact of left ventricular shape on regional function: a magnetic resonance myocardial tagging study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2000;35(6):1525–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Yla-Herttuala E, Laidinen S, Laakso H, Liimatainen T. Quantification of myocardial infarct area based on T(RAFFn) relaxation time maps - comparison with cardiovascular magnetic resonance late gadolinium enhancement, T(1ρ) and T(2) in vivo. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2018;20(1):34–. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Lohofer F, Hoffmann L, Buchholz R, Huber K, Glinzer A, Kosanke K, et al. Molecular imaging of myocardial infarction with Gadofluorine P - A combined magnetic resonance and mass spectrometry imaging approach. Heliyon 2018;4(4):e00606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Epstein FH. MR in mouse models of cardiac disease. NMR in biomedicine 2007;20(3):238–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Biering-Sorensen T, Knappe D, Pouleur AC, Claggett B, Wang PJ, Moss AJ, et al. Regional Longitudinal Deformation Improves Prediction of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A MADIT-CRT Substudy (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy). Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10(1). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Cikes M, Solomon SD. Beyond ejection fraction: an integrative approach for assessment of cardiac structure and function in heart failure. Eur Heart J 2016;37(21):1642–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Mosleh W, Elango K, Shah T, Chaudhari M, Gandhi S, Kattel S, et al. Elevated end-diastolic wall stress after acute myocardial infarction predicts adverse cardiovascular outcomes and longer hospital length of stay. Echocardiography 2018;35(11):1721–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Bolooki H, Fisher R, Jude JR. Effects of acute ischemia and reperfusion on the length-tension-velocity of myocardial contraction in an experimental model heart. Surg Forum 1969;20:156–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Kimura E, Tabata T, Tanaka H, Harada K, Yamada H, Nomura M, et al. Left ventricular geometry and myocardial contractility in patients with essential hypertension evaluated by myocardial velocity profile. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography 2005;18(11):1222–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Andersen NH, Poulsen SH. Evaluation of the longitudinal contraction of the left ventricle in normal subjects by Doppler tissue tracking and strain rate. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003;16(7):716–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Warren SE, Royal HD, Markis JE, Grossman W, McKay RG. Time course of left ventricular dilation after myocardial infarction: influence of infarct-related artery and success of coronary thrombolysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1988;11(1):12–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Sutton Martin GSJ, Sharpe N. Left Ventricular Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 2000;101(25):2981–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Kramer CM, Lima JA, Reichek N, Ferrari VA, Llaneras MR, Palmon LC, et al. Regional differences in function within noninfarcted myocardium during left ventricular remodeling. Circulation 1993;88(3):1279–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].French BA, Kramer CM. Mechanisms of Post-Infarct Left Ventricular Remodeling. Drug discovery today Disease mechanisms 2007;4(3):185–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Yan AT, Shayne AJ, Brown KA, Gupta SN, Chan CW, Luu TM, et al. Characterization of the peri-infarct zone by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is a powerful predictor of post-myocardial infarction mortality. Circulation 2006;114(1):32–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Schuleri KH, Centola M, Evers KS, Zviman A, Evers R, Lima JA, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance characterization of peri-infarct zone remodeling following myocardial infarction. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2012;14:24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Moore CC, Lugo-Olivieri CH, McVeigh ER, Zerhouni EA. Three-dimensional systolic strain patterns in the normal human left ventricle: characterization with tagged MR imaging. Radiology 2000;214(2):453–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Reimer KA, Lowe JE, Rasmussen MM, Jennings RB. The wavefront phenomenon of ischemic cell death. 1. Myocardial infarct size vs duration of coronary occlusion in dogs. Circulation 1977;56(5):786–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES