Abstract
Skyrmions, magnetic textures with topological stability, hold promises for high-density and energy-efficient information storage devices owing to their small size and low driving-current density. Precise creation of a single nanoscale skyrmion is a prerequisite to further understand the skyrmion physics and tailor skyrmion-based applications. Here, we demonstrate the creation of individual skyrmions at zero-field in an exchange-biased magnetic multilayer with exposure to soft X-rays. In particular, a single skyrmion with 100-nm size can be created at the desired position using a focused X-ray spot of sub-50-nm size. This single skyrmion creation is driven by the X-ray-induced modification of the antiferromagnetic order and the corresponding exchange bias. Furthermore, artificial skyrmion lattices with various arrangements can be patterned using X-ray. These results demonstrate the potential of accurate optical control of single skyrmion at sub-100 nm scale. We envision that X-ray could serve as a versatile tool for local manipulation of magnetic orders.
Subject terms: Spintronics, Spintronics
Skyrmions are objects with whirled magnetization protected by their topology that can be created by different means, however, without control of their position. Here, the authors present a method exploiting x-rays to create skyrmions at the beam position allowing for creation of artificial skyrmion lattices.
Introduction
Magnetic skyrmions are topologically protected spin textures arising in magnetic materials most commonly with the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction (DMI)1,2. Although first observed in B20-type bulk compounds3,4, which host the intrinsic DMI, skyrmions residing in magnetic thin films with tunable interfacial DMI are more applicable to practical applications5–10. Precise creation of a single nanoscale skyrmion is of vital importance for understanding and harnessing magnetic skyrmions. To date, the electrical creations of a single skyrmion have been experimentally demonstrated5,11, e.g., spin-polarized currents or electric fields can favor the flip of spins and induce the creation of a single skyrmion. By leveraging a non-uniform device geometry or a naturally formed defect, a current pulse can also generate a single skyrmion7,12–14. In addition to electrical means, optical methods can also offer an efficient way for manipulating magnetizations, with the advantages of ultrafast dynamics and flexibility in selecting the writing position15. Recent proposals have predicted that lasers can be used to create skyrmions via laser fields or local heating16–18. However, the spot size of conventional lasers is fundamentally limited by the light wavelengths to above several hundred nanometers. Thus these lasers can only create either single large-sized magnetic bubbles15,16,19,20 or groups of skyrmions16,21,22, while creation of single small skyrmions requires excitation light with a shorter wavelength.
Soft X-rays have been used for magnetic imaging23 thanks to the high spatial resolution associated with its short wavelengths of the order of a few nm and the existence of a strong magnetic contrast mechanism in the form of X-ray magnetic circular dichroism, which causes X-ray absorption to depend on the magnetization component parallel to the wave vector of incident light24. Although X-rays have been extensively used as a probe technique, their potential for manipulating magnetization is still largely unexplored.
In this work, we demonstrate that soft X-rays can create single skyrmions with 100-nm size at zero field and room temperature in an exchange-biased magnetic multilayer. We find that the X-ray can induce an unexpected exchange bias reorientation effect. Based on this effect, single skyrmions, skyrmion-track, and artificial skyrmion lattice are successfully created. The high spatial resolution of X-ray provides a unique optical tool for creating single small skyrmions. Furthermore, the created skyrmion-track and artificial skyrmion lattice can not only serve as a versatile platform for studying skyrmion physics and topological phenomena but may also lead to potential skyrmionic applications.
Results
Observation of the exchange bias reorientation effect
The studied sample consists of Si3N4/Pt (5 nm)/Co (0.6 nm)/IrMn (5 nm)/[Pt (2 nm)/Co (0.6 nm)/IrMn (5 nm)]11/NiO (2 nm) (for details of the sample structure, see Supplementary Note 1). The sample shows a perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (see Fig. 1b and Supplementary Note 2). No exchange bias is observed in the out-of-plane M–H loop of the as-grown sample (Fig. 1b), because the interfacial uncompensated spins are not uniformly aligned in a single direction. The interfacial uncompensated spin can be realigned through a typical field-cooling process, resulting in the appearance of an exchange bias (Fig. 1c, also see Supplementary Note 2), which can enhance the stability for skyrmions at zero magnetic field25.
To characterize the detailed domain structure of the sample, an illumination process is carried out using a scanning transmission X-ray microscopy (STXM)26 by means of a step-by-step scanning, as illustrated in Fig. 1a. We first perform a scanning process over the studied as-grown sample at zero field with a dwell time of 5 ms. As shown in Fig. 1d, g, the sample exhibits a typical labyrinth domain pattern at the remnant state. When we scan the central area in Fig. 1d with a dwell time of 30 ms in the presence of a 2000 Oe saturation field (perpendicular to the film), an unexpected result is observed that the illuminated area (dashed square) becomes a single domain at zero magnetic field after the illumination, as shown in Fig. 1e, h. The magnetization direction of the central area can also be reoriented in the opposite direction by applying an opposite magnetic field during the illumination, as shown in Fig. 1f, i. These are in sharp contrast to the unaffected labyrinth pattern outside the illuminated central area.
Since the as-grown sample has randomly distributed local exchange bias, it might be possible that a uniform exchange bias is introduced by the X-ray illumination inside a magnetic bias field. In this case, if the magnitude of this exchange bias is close to the saturation field of the sample, it can overcome the dipole–dipole interaction (which favors a labyrinth domain structure) and maintain a single domain pattern at zero magnetic field. Such formation of a uniform exchange bias is confirmed by the local hysteresis loop measurements of the illuminated central area (see Supplementary Note 3). Similar exchange bias reorientation effects have also been observed in a series of samples (see Supplementary Note 4). These observations imply that the antiferromagnetic correlations of IrMn are disturbed during the X-ray illumination and are realigned according to the adjacent Co magnetization direction after the illumination, resulting in the formation of a uniform exchange bias within the illumination region.
To further confirm that the exchange bias reorientation is due to the interaction between the X-ray and IrMn, we examined the reorientation effect at different element-specific photon energies. For each photon energy, a new area on the sample that has not been scanned or imaged before is used to eliminate the hysteretic effect of scanning sequence (for details, see “Methods”). During the X-ray illumination, a positive external magnetic field is applied. The corresponding bright area percentage PB = S(M↑)/S(M↑ + M↓) is used to quantify the strength of the reorientation effect. Here S(M↑) and S(M↓) represent the area for magnetization point up (bright) and down (dark), respectively. PB as a function of the photon energy is plotted in Fig. 2. When the photon energy is at around Mn L3 absorption edge (641.0 eV), a dramatic change of PB is observed, while there is no obvious change of PB at around Co L3 absorption edge (780.4 eV). These results indicate that the exchange bias reorientation is due to the interaction between the soft X-ray photon and the Mn atom and further demonstrate the X-ray-induced manipulation of the antiferromagnetic ordering of IrMn layer.
There are two possible mechanisms of the exchange bias reorientation effect in IrMn layer. One may intuitively attribute this phenomenon to an incoherent heating effect. If the heating effect plays a major role, PB should be closely related to the X-ray flux, which is an important factor in determining the X-ray-induced heating27. However, it is found that PB is proportional to the total photon number and nearly independent of the X-ray flux at a fixed photon number (Supplementary Note 5 and Supplementary Fig. 11). Moreover, the exchange bias reorientation effect gets even stronger at low temperature (see Fig. 2c), further eliminating the major role of heating effect (see more details in Supplementary Note 5). The calculated possible maximum increase in temperature due to the X-ray illumination is only about 0.3 K (the temperature was estimated by COMSOL simulations, for details see Supplementary Note 6), which is negligible compared with the measured blocking temperature (TB ≈ 400 K, Supplementary Fig. 4). Therefore, the observed phenomenon is not a thermal effect and different from the previously studied laser-induced thermal modification of the antiferromagnetic order in antiferromagnet/ferromagnet bilayers28. Alternatively, coherent photon-induced electron excitation in the antiferromagnetic oxide can cause the reconstruction of antiferromagnetic order29 or the change of anisotropy30,31. It is plausible here that the X-ray-induced excitation of electrons from 2p to 3d may lead to similar effects. Moreover, the bright area percentage PB is independent of the X-ray polarization (Supplementary Fig. 12), further indicating the major role of photon absorption15. The correlation between the exchange bias reorientation effect and the photon absorption at Mn L3 edge (Fig. 2) shows strong evidence of the X-ray-induced manipulation of antiferromagnetic order. This exchange bias reorientation effect could enable the creation of single skyrmions, which will be discussed in the following section.
X-ray-induced single skyrmion creation
In the studied multilayer, skyrmions with a size between 99 and 113 nm can exist under an out-of-plane magnetic field (Supplementary Note 7), indicating that they are energetically stable and can be stabilized via the exchange bias at zero field. The exchange bias reorientation effect furthermore allows the creation of such single skyrmion at zero field. This is done by first creating an exchange-bias-defined 1-μm-wide single domain track as a background (Fig. 3a). Within the track, the exchange bias is reoriented in the negative direction, hence sustaining the single domain of Co layer. To create a skyrmion, the X-ray spot is scanned over a 200-by-200 nm2 area (white squares in Fig. 3a). After the illumination, a single skyrmion of around 100 nm diameter can be observed (dashed circle with 400 nm diameter is used to indicate the created skyrmion). The second skyrmion of similar size was also successfully written on the track as shown in Fig. 3c. It can be seen that, while low fluxes were used to image the magnetic film after writing exposures, the additional X-ray illumination still increased the size of the previously created skyrmion (the right one). The size of both skyrmions can be further increased by performing another low-flux reading process (dwell time of 5 ms), as shown in Fig. 3d, which provides us a means to delicately tune the skyrmion size.
To better understand the skyrmion creation process, we performed micromagnetic simulations to capture its microscopic origin on a full magnetic multilayer stack with 400 nm × 400 nm lateral size and 10 repetitions (for details of the micromagnetic simulations, see “Methods”). An out-of-plane external field is applied to simulate the exchange bias effect. As discussed above, due to the interaction between the X-rays and IrMn, the exchange bias within the X-ray illumination region is destroyed during the illumination process, as shown in Fig. 4e. In the simulations, a circular area with 44 nm diameter is employed as the X-ray illumination region (Fig. 4a). The effect of X-ray illumination is simulated by turning the external field off in the illuminated region.
The simulation results, shown in Fig. 4a–d, demonstrate that a single skyrmion can be successfully created at the X-ray illumination region. This skyrmion creation process can be understood by the calculated energies of the ferromagnetic state and the skyrmion state (Fig. 4g). Before applying the X-rays, the ferromagnetic state has lower energy than the skyrmion state (Fig. 4g top) and thus the skyrmion cannot be created spontaneously. During the X-ray illumination, the energy of the skyrmion state is reduced owing to the vanishing local exchange bias (Fig. 4g middle). The effective fields (including the exchange field, the DMI field, the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy field, and the dipole–dipole field) around the illumination region favor the creation of skyrmion locally as shown in Fig. 4f. The thermal fluctuation, in combination with the effective fields, can drive a transition from the ferromagnetic state to the skyrmion state and create a single skyrmion within the illumination region. After the illumination, the local exchange bias recovers and reorients its direction according to the local magnetization direction, and the skyrmion state acquires lower energy than the ferromagnetic state. The recovered exchange bias within the illumination region further enhances the stability of the created skyrmion (Fig. 4g bottom). Furthermore, the created skyrmion shows a Néel-type structure and the calculated topological charge Q = 0.95 (this imperfection is due to the discrete lattice model, finite size effects, and thermal fluctuations, for details see Supplementary Note 8) clearly reflects its topological nature.
Discussion
Our simulation results also suggest that, by optimizing material parameters, a single skyrmion with around 50-nm size, which is comparable with the X-ray spot size (44 nm), can also be created with our method (Supplementary Note 8). Although the currently studied sample only supports 100-nm skyrmions, further material optimizations in conjugation with smaller X-ray spot size could lead to a promising pathway to optically manipulating even smaller skyrmions.
Taking advantage of the precise creation of single skyrmions, artificial skyrmion lattice can also be patterned using X-rays. Such patterned artificial skyrmion lattices with triangular and square arrangements are demonstrated in Fig. 5. Owing to film variations, defects, and other extrinsic factors, it is not that easy to realize fine skyrmion lattice in magnetic multilayers. The X-ray patterned artificial skyrmion lattice thus provides an alternative way to study skyrmion lattice in magnetic multilayers. Moreover, skyrmion lattice with unconventional arrangements can also be patterned, e.g., the square skyrmion lattice shown in Fig. 5b, making such material system a versatile platform for studying numerous topological phenomena, such as the topological Hall effect2, topological magnons and their edge states32,33, etc.
The modification of an antiferromagnetic order via X-ray illumination allows us for the first time to optically manipulate magnetic order with high spatial resolution. Single skyrmion creation is demonstrated as an example of the application of the local exchange bias reorientation effect. The ultra-high spatial resolution of X-ray can also be used for manipulating other ultra-small magnetic textures. These findings may provide a pathway to imprint a domain into the antiferromagnetic layer through exchange bias effect34,35, which might be used for creating an antiferromagnetic skyrmion using X-ray in an exchange bias system36. This work will motivate research to study the X-ray manipulation of magnetic orders including ferromagnets and antiferromagnets, which pushes the optical manipulation down to the sub-100-nm scale.
Methods
Experimental details
The sample consisting of Pt (5 nm)/Co (0.6 nm)/Ir22Mn78 (IrMn) (5 nm)/[Pt (2 nm)/Co (0.6 nm)/IrMn (5 nm)]11/NiO (2 nm) was grown on silicon nitride membranes and a semi-insulating Si substrate with 100-nm-thick thermally formed SiO2 layer by a ULVAC MPS-4000-HC7 magnetic sputtering system. The background vacuum was 4.75 × 10−6 Pa. The deposition rate for Pt, Co, and IrMn were 4.18 Å/s, 1.91 Å/s, and 7.77 Å/s at a power of 100 W and a pressure of 0.16 Pa. The deposition rate for NiO was 0.92 Å/s at a power of 100 watts and a pressure of 1.5 Pa. The microscopic images were acquired at scanning transmission X-ray microscope MAXYMUS located at BESSY II synchrotron Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin (HZB) (Berlin, Germany). The magnetic images were obtained at Co L3 absorption edge (780.4 eV) using circularly polarized X-ray light. The X-rays consist of periodic pulses with a width of 50 ps and at the frequency of 499.65 MHz. The beam was focused with Fresnel Zone Plate with outermost zone width ∆r = 18 nm that provided a focus spot of 22 nm. The estimated full width of the central peak of the airy shaped focus spot is about 44 nm. The scanning step is 20 nm. A low flux is used for all the imaging purpose and a high flux is used for all the modification of the exchange bias and the creation of single skyrmion. The scanning process can be described as follows: first, (a) the sample was divided into square sub-blocks each with 6 μm × 6 μm lateral size; then (b) the scanning was performed at the central area (3 × 3 μm2 lateral area) of the sub-blocks. The photon energy is fixed to be 780.3 eV for all the scanning and imaging processes in Fig. 1. In Fig. 2, different sub-blocks were scanned using different photon energies. For each photon energy, a new sub-block that has not been scanned or imaged before was scanned. After the scanning, an imaging process was done with 780.3 eV photon energy to get the value of PB.
Micromagnetic simulations
The micromagnetic simulations were carried out using Mumax337. A magnetic multilayer with ten repetitions was simulated. The geometry of each magnetic layer is 400 nm × 400 nm × 0.6 nm with a mesh size of 4 nm × 4 nm × 0.6 nm. Different magnetic layers are separated by a 7-nm spacer, which is the same as the studied sample. A general Hamiltonian with exchange interaction, DMI, perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA), Zeeman interaction, and magnetic dipole–dipole interaction is considered in the simulations. The following parameters were used in the simulations: the exchange constant A = 10 pJ/m, the DMI constant D = 1.35 mJ/m2, the PMA constant Ku = 950 kJ/m3, the saturation magnetization MS = 1150 kA/m, and the Gilbert damping constant α = 0.4. An out-of-plane external field, Bext = 35 mT, is applied to simulate the exchange bias effect of IrMn. A circular region with 44 nm radius is used as the X-ray-illumination region. The simulations were carried out at 300 K with an open boundary condition.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China [Grant No. 2017YFA0206200], the National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC, Grants No.11874409, 11804380, 11434014, 51620105004, 11674373], the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. Z190009), the Strategic Priority Research Program (B) [Grant No. XDB07030200], the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences (Grant No. QYZDJ-SSW-SLH016), the International Partnership Program (No.112111KYSB20170090) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), and the Fujian Innovation Academy, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. FJCXY18040302). Measurements were carried out at the MAXYMUS endstation at Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin. We thank HZB for the allocation of beamtime. S.K.K. and Y.T. acknowledge the support from the Army Research Office under Contract No. W911NF-14-1-0016. Y.L. acknowledges the support from Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences through the International Young Scientist Fellowship (Grant No. 2018001). G.Y. acknowledges helpful discussions with Xiaoguang Zhang, Xin Ma, and Haibin Zhao.
Author contributions
G.Y. conceived the idea. Y.G. prepared the samples and performed the characterization of multilayer films with supports from G.Y., C.W., J.F., X.W., C.G., and H.W. G.Y. and I.B. performed the X-ray imaging experiments using STXM with supports from M.W., J.G., and G.S. Y.L. performed the micromagnetic simulations with supports from G.Y., Z.Y., S.K.K., and Y.T. E.G. performed the calculation of increased temperature induced by the X-ray with supports from G.Y. J.Z., H.Z., and Y.P. performed the TEM measurements. G.Y. drafted the paper and all authors commented on the manuscript. The study was performed under the supervision of G.Y. and X.H.
Data availability
The authors declare that the main data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. Extra data are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Jung-Il Hong and the other anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Yao Guang, Iuliia Bykova, Yizhou Liu.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41467-020-14769-0.
References
- 1.Fert A, Reyren N, Cros V. Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017;2:17031. doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.31. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nagaosa N, Tokura Y. Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013;8:899–911. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2013.243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Muhlbauer S, et al. Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009;323:915–919. doi: 10.1126/science.1166767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yu XZ, et al. Real-space observation of a two-dimensional skyrmion crystal. Nature. 2010;465:901–904. doi: 10.1038/nature09124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Romming N, et al. Writing and deleting single magnetic skyrmions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013;341:636–639. doi: 10.1126/science.1240573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Heinze S, et al. Spontaneous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions. Nat. Phys. 2011;7:713–718. doi: 10.1038/nphys2045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jiang W, et al. Blowing magnetic skyrmion bubbles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015;349:283–286. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Moreau-Luchaire C, et al. Additive interfacial chiral interaction in multilayers for stabilization of small individual skyrmions at room temperature. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016;11:731–731. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2016.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Woo S, et al. Observation of room-temperature magnetic skyrmions and their current-driven dynamics in ultrathin metallic ferromagnets. Nat. Mater. 2016;15:501–506. doi: 10.1038/nmat4593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yu G, et al. Room-temperature creation and spin–orbit torque manipulation of skyrmions in thin films with engineered asymmetry. Nano Lett. 2016;16:1981–1988. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hsu PJ, et al. Electric-field-driven switching of individual magnetic skyrrnions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017;12:123–126. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2016.234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Buttner F, et al. Field-free deterministic ultrafast creation of magnetic skyrmions by spin-orbit torques. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017;12:1040–1044. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2017.178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yu G, et al. Room-temperature skyrmion shift device for memory application. Nano Lett. 2017;17:261–268. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Woo S, et al. Deterministic creation and deletion of a single magnetic skyrmion observed by direct time-resolved X-ray microscopy. Nat. Electron. 2018;1:288–296. doi: 10.1038/s41928-018-0070-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kirilyuk A, Kimel AV, Rasing T. Ultrafast optical manipulation of magnetic order. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010;82:2731. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2731. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Koshibae W, Nagaosa N. Creation of skyrmions and antiskyrmions by local heating. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:5148. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fujita H, Sato M. Ultrafast generation of skyrmionic defects with vortex beams: printing laser profiles on magnets. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;95:054421. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.054421. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Stepanov EA, Dutreix C, Katsnelson MI. Dynamical and reversible control of topological spin textures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;118:157201. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.157201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stanciu C, et al. All-optical magnetic recording with circularly polarized light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007;99:047601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.047601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Finazzi M, et al. Laser-induced magnetic nanostructures with tunable topological properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013;110:177205. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.177205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Berruto G, et al. Laser-induced skyrmion writing and erasing in an ultrafast cryo-Lorentz transmission electron microscope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018;120:117201. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.117201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Je SG, et al. Creation of magnetic skyrmion bubble lattices by ultrafast laser in ultrathin films. Nano Lett. 2018;18:7362–7371. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fischer P. Viewing spin structures with soft X-ray microscopy. Mater. Today. 2010;13:14–22. doi: 10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70161-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Schutz G, et al. Absorption of circularly polarized X-rays in iron. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987;58:737–740. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yu G, et al. Room-temperature skyrmions in an antiferromagnet-based heterostructure. Nano Lett. 2018;18:980. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nolle D, et al. Note: Unique characterization possibilities in the ultra high vacuum scanning transmission x-ray microscope (UHV-STXM) “MAXYMUS” using a rotatable permanent magnetic field up to 0.22 T. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2012;83:046112. doi: 10.1063/1.4707747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Harald Wallander JW. Simulated sample heating from a nanofocussed X-ray beam. J. Synchrotron Rad. 2017;24:925–933. doi: 10.1107/S1600577517008712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Weber MC, Nembach H, Hillebrands B, Fassbender J. Modified Gilbert damping due to exchange bias in NiFe/FeMn mayers. J. Appl. Phys. 2005;97:10A701. doi: 10.1063/1.1846299. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ehrke H, et al. Photoinduced melting of antiferromagnetic order in La0.5Sr1.5MnO4 measured using ultrafast resonant soft X-ray diffraction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011;106:217401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.217401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Duong NP, Satoh T, Fiebig M. Ultrafast manipulation of antiferromagnetism of NiO. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004;93:117402. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.117402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ma X, et al. Ultrafast spin exchange-coupling torque via photo-excited charge-transfer processes. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:8800. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Li ZX, Wang C, Cao YS, Yan P. Edge states in a two-dimensional honeycomb lattice of massive magnetic skyrmions. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;98:180407(R). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.180407. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kim SK, Tserkovnyak Y. Chiral edge mode in the coupled dynamics of magnetic solitons in a honeycomb lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;119:077204. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.077204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Baltz V, et al. Antiferromagnetic spintronics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2018;90:015005. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wu J, et al. Direct observation of imprinted antiferromagnetic vortex states in CoO/Fe/Ag(001) discs. Nat. Phys. 2011;7:303–306. doi: 10.1038/nphys1891. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zarzuela, R., Kim, S. K. & Tserkovnyak, Y. Stabilization of the skyrmion crystal phase in thin-film antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B100, 100408(R) (2019).
- 37.Vansteenkiste A, et al. The design and verification of MuMax3. AIP Adv. 2014;4:107133. doi: 10.1063/1.4899186. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors declare that the main data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. Extra data are available from the corresponding author upon request.