Abstract
Although it is reported that the targeting ability of hyaluronic acid (HA)-based nanoparticles (NPs) is molecular weight (MW) dependent, the influence of HA MW on targeting efficiency of HA-functionalized NPs and the underlying mechanism remain elusive. In this study, we constituted three HA-functionalized Dox-loaded NPs (Dox/HCVs) different HA MWs (7, 63, and 102 kDa) and attempted to illustrate the effects of HA MW on the targeting efficiency. The three Dox/HCVs had similar physiochemical and pharmaceutical characteristics, but showed different affinity to CD44 receptor. Furthermore, Dox/HCV-63 exerted the best targeting effect and the highest cytotoxicity compared with Dox/HCV-7 and Dox/HCV-102. It was interesting to found that both the HA-CD44 binding affinity and induced CD44 clustering by HA-based NPs were HA MW-dependent, the two of which determine the apparent targeting efficacy of Dox/HCV NPs in the conflicting directions. Those results laid a good foundation for rationally designing HA-based NPs in cancer therapy.
Keywords: Hyaluronic acid, Molecular weight, Active targeting efficiency, CD44 receptor, Potential mechanism
Graphical abstract
Three active targeting nanoparticles with different hyaluronic acid molecular weight were prepared for exploring the relationship of hyaluronic acid molecular weight and active targeting efficacy and discussing potential mechanisms.
1. Introduction
Comparing with conventional nontargeted nanoparticulate drug delivery systems (Nano-DDS), active targeting Nano-DDS has attracted great attention due to enhanced therapeutic effect and reduced undesirable side effects. They are usually fabricated by modifying nanocarriers with active targeting moieties which recognize specific biomarkers on the surface of tumor cells, such as antibody [1], nucleic acid [2], peptide [3], hyaluronic acid [4], some essential nutrients related transporters like biotin [5], amino acid [6], folate [7] and other various ligands. Among them, hyaluronic acid (HA) draws a great of attention due to its good properties.
HA is a natural occurrence linear anionic glycosaminoglycan polymer with a wide range of sizes composed of a simple repeating disaccharide of d-glucuronic acid and N-acetyl-d-glucosamine linked with a glucuronidic β (1,3) bond and is ubiquitous in tissues and fluids. HA possesses superior characteristics in water solubility, biocompatibility, biodegradation, non-toxicity, and non-immunogenicity [8], [9]. Together with the abundance of readily-modified carboxyl and hydroxyl groups, it has been widely utilized as carrier to deliver low-molecule weight drug [10], [11], [12], antibody [13], nucleic acid [14], protein [15] and tissue engineering [16], [17], etc. HA abundantly exists in extracellular matrix to exhibit vital multiple physiological functions by interacting with its specific receptors called hyaladherins, including CD44, lymphatic vessel endothelial HA receptor (LYVE-1), inter-α-inhibitor (IαI), CD38, receptor for HA-mediated motility (RHAMM, also called CD168) and tumor necrosis factor-stimulated gene-6 (TSG-6) [18], [19], [20], etc. Therein CD44 is a principal hyaladherins and a trans-membrane glycoprotein participating in diverse significant cellular functions, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, angiogenesis and mediates cellular endocytosis of HA for degradation [8], [20], [21], [22]. In addition, CD44 is usually overexpressed in many kinds of malignant tumor cells, and many studies have demonstrated that nanoparticles modified with HA exerted better tumor targeting effect due to HA-CD44 specific interaction [23], [24], [25], [26], [27].
It has been found that HA molecular weight (MW) determines its diverse physiological functions, including cell migration, proliferation, angiogenesis, and gene expression and so on [28], [29]. As for HA-based active targeting Nano-DDS, HA MW also affects its active targeting efficiency. For instance, Fe3O4 NPs coated with 31 kDa HA showed a better targeting ability to Hela cells than 6 kDa HA [30] and the cellular uptake of HA-grafted liposomes was improved with increase of HA MW (5–8 < 10–12 < 175–350 kDa) [31]. Similar conclusions also have been achieved by other reports [32], [33], [34]. On the contrary, there are some different findings, for example, the photodynamic therapy HACE NPs based on 20 kDa HA exerted better intracellular uptake capability and therapeutic efficacy than those based on 50 kDa and 100 kDa HA [35].
In this work, we intended to explore the relationship of HA MW and active targeting efficiency for HA-functionalized Nano-DDS and then to provide reliable scientific valid guidance for designing HA-based NPs. Based on our previous studies [36], we modified HA covalently with hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPCD) to prepare three different MWs HA-based nanocarriers, and then assembled Doxorubicin (Dox)-loaded nanoparticles (labeled as Dox/HCVs) by the host-guest inclusion interaction of cyclodextrin and bridging effect of vitamin E succinate (VES) (Scheme 1). We further investigated their physiochemical and pharmaceutical properties, evaluated cellular active targeting efficacy and probed the underlying mechanism.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Materials
Sodium hyaluronate (HA, MW = 7, 63, 102 kDa) was obtained from Frida biological engineering Co. Ltd. (Shandong, China). Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPCD) was kindly supplied by Shijiazhuang Pharmaceutical Group Co. Ltd. (Hebei, China). mPEG5000 and vitamin E succinate (VES) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St, Louis, MO, USA). 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethyalminopropl) carbodiimide (EDC) was purchased from Shanghai Haiqu Pharm Co. Ltd and 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBT) was obtained from Pukang Pharm Co. Ltd. (Zhejiang, China). Cell culture medium Dulbecco's modified eagle's medium (DMEM) and Roswell Park Memorial Institute-1640 (RPMI-1640) were purchased from Gibco, Invitrogen Corp. (Carlsbad, California, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS), 3-(4,5-dimthy-2 -thiazolyl)-2,5-dipphenyl-2H-terazolium bromide (MTT), 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazinee -thanesulfonic acid (HEPES), trypsin and other materials for cell culture were provided by Dalian Meilun Biotechnology Co. Ltd. Doxorubicin hydrochloride (Dox•HCl) was purchased from Huafeng United Technology Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China), and it was deprotonated with twice molar amount of triethylamine before use. Other organic solvents or reagents used were analytic grade.
2.2. Synthesis and characterization of HPCD grafted HA conjugates (HA-CDs)
To synthesize HPCD grafted HA conjugates, HA (0.2 g, 0.5 mmol), EDC (0.2 g, 1 mmol) and HOBT (0.11 g, 1 mmol) were dissolved in 5 ml anhydrous formamide and stirred in ice-bath for 2 h. Then, 0.5 g HPCD dissolved in anhydrous formamide was dropwise into the reaction solution with stirring. After the reaction solution was stirred at 40 °C for 48 h with the protection of N2, the mixture was dialyzed against distilled water for a week (four times changes one day and the MW cut off 3500 Da) and then lyophilized after filtration to gain white powder HA-CDs. The structures of conjugates were confirmed by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer (1H NMR, Bruker-600 MHz, Switzerland) and fourier infrared spectrometer spectroscopy (FT-IR, IFS55, Bruker, Switzerland). For FT-IR, the samples were pressed with KBr and scanned from 4000 to 400 cm−1 under vacuum. The HPCD grafting density (degree of substitution, DS) was calculated by the peak areas of the characteristic peak of HA around 2 ppm (A2ppm) and HPCD around 5 ppm (A5ppm) according to the following formula:
where 7 is the number of hydrogen atom in HPCD (H (1,1′)) and 3 is the number of hydrogen atom of –CH3 in HA [37].
1H NMR (600 MHz, D2O, TMS, δ): 1.01(s, –CH3- of hydroxypropyl); 1.88 (s, –CH3- of HA); 4.43 (S, H (1,1′) of HA glycoside); 4.94 (d, H (1,1′) of HPCD glycoside); 3.07–3.89 (m, H signals of HA glycoside)
2.3. Preparation and characterization of Dox-loaded HA-CDs nanoparticles (Dox/HCVs)
Nanoparticles were prepared by emulsion solvent evaporation method. Briefly, 2 mg VES was dissolved in 1 ml dichloromethane (DCM) then the solution was poured into 4 ml HEPES buffer (pH 7.4) which contains 10 mg HA-CD, then the mixture was under sonication for 10 min at 100 W (turn on for 2 s with a 3 s interval) in ice bath by a probe-type sonifier. Afterward, it was evaporated to remove the DCM under reduced pressure with a rotary evaporator and centrifuged 10 min at 13000 rpm, and then filtered through 0.45 µm filter to gain the final preparations. For getting the Dox-loaded nanoparticles, the same procedure was carried out except for dissolving another 0.5 mg Dox in DCM.
The size, zeta potential and polydispersion index (PDI) were detected by dynamic light scattering (DLS) using Malvern Zetasizer instrument (Nano ZS, Malvern, UK) at 25 °C. The colloidal stability of preparations was explored by determining the particle size at time intervals by DLS. The micelle morphology was observed by JEM-2100 trans-mission electron microscope (TEM, JEOL, Japan). Negatively stained method was used on a carbon-coated copper grid with 2% phosphotungstic acid. The encapsulation efficiency (EE) and drug-loading content (DL) were measured by a UV–vis spectrometer at 485 nm. In general, the prepared nanoparticles (uncentrifuged) and the centrifugal supernatant were diluted with methanol and treated with ultrasonic to destroy the structure of nanoparticles and dissolve the Dox completely, then the Dox contents were measured. Meanwhile, a certain amount of drug (MDox) was measured precisely, and the quality of total sample (MTotal) was weighted after lyophilization. The EE and DL were calculated using following formulas.
2.4. In vitro release profiles of Dox-loaded preparations
The kinetics of drug efflux were studied as previously described [36]. Briefly, 1 ml preparation was packaged in dialysis membrane bag (MW cut-off 14 kDa), then was immersed in 30 ml PBS (pH 7.4, pH 6.5 and pH 5) with a continuously shaking at 100 rpm at 37 °C. At designated periods, 1 ml of medium was extracted and another 1 ml fresh medium was refilled. The concentrations of Dox were measured by HPLC method after filtrating by 0.22 µm filter membrane.
2.5. Cell culture growth and maintenance
Monolayers of cells were grown with 10 cm dishes in an incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2 and 95% relative humidity. Hela cells and MCF-7 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. H460 cells and A549 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. The cells were subculture with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA in PBS.
2.6. Analysis of cell surface CD44
For flow cytometry, the presence of CD44 on the cell surface was detected by indirect staining with secondary antibody (Dlight-488 conjugated IgG) [25], [32], [38]. Firstly, cells were plated on glass cover slips in 6-well plate for 24 h, washed twice with PBS buffer and treated with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA to collect cells. Then cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), permeabilized by 0.1% Triton-X 100, incubated with anti-CD44 antibody (Abcam119348, 1:200) overnight at 4 °C, the negative control sample were incubated with isotype antibody (Affymetrix eBioscience, 14-4031). Then samples were treated with Dlight-488 conjugated secondary antibody for 30 min at room temperature. After washing with PBS three times, the samples were resuspended in PBS and analyzed by flow cytometry (BD Biosciences, Oxford, UK).
For immunofluorescence method, 1 × 105 cells/well cells were seeded on glass cover slips in 24-well plate to grow overnight. After washed twice with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), the cells were incubated overnight with the primary antibody (Abcam119348, 1:200) at 4 °C and then for 30 min with the secondary antibody at room temperature. The nuclei were stained with DAPI for 10 min. Finally, the slides were mounted with antifade mounting medium (Beyotime, P0126) and samples were visualized using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM, Nikon C2SI, Japan).
To visualize the CD44 receptors change of existence forms and distribution, we pretreated cells with non-drug-loaded nanoparticles (HCVs) for presupposed time and then disposed them according to the above process.
2.7. Proliferation inhibition experiments
The proliferation inhibition of various formulations was evaluated using classical MTT method. Cells were plated in 96-well cell culture plates (5000 cells/well) and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Cells were treated with varies of concentrations of Dox, Dox/HCV-7, Dox/HCV-63, Dox/HCV-102 for 48 h. After aspirating the treatment medium, 100 µl of fresh medium and 20 ul of MTT solution (5 mg/ml) were added to the cells. After 4 h incubation, plates were read at 570 nm using a BioRad microplate reader (Model 500, USA). The cells treated with medium without drugs were treated as negative controls. The log dose-response curve was plotted and the median inhibitory concentration (IC50) was calculated with the software GraphPad Prism 5.
2.8. Cellular uptake of Dox/HCVs
Briefly, the cells were plated on a 6-well plate (0.5 million cells per well) and cultured for 24 h, and the various preparations diluted with serum-free media (the final concentration of 10 µg/ml of Dox) were added to the cells, with serum-free medium-treated cells as control. After 1 h or 3 h of incubation at 37 °C, the medium was discarded and the cells were washed three times with ice-cold PBS, harvested by centrifugation (3000 rpm, 5 min), washed with PBS three times again. At last, the cells were resuspended in 0.3 ml PBS for analysis based on the fluorescence of Dox by flow cytometer.
2.9. Potential mechanism of nanoparticle endocytosis
The potential endocytic mechanisms of nanoparticles were performed with the method reported before [39]. Hela cells were seeded in 6-well plate (0.5 million cells per well) and cultured for 24 h. Chlorpromazine hydrochloride (CPZ, 10 µg/ml), colchicine (8 µg/ml), quercetin (6 µg/ml), indomethacin (6 µg/ml) and free HA (MW 102 kDa, 5 mg/ml) were added to each well and pre-incubated for 1 h, respectively. Then the mediums were replaced with Dox/HCVs nanoparticles (the final concentration of 10 µg/ml of Dox) along with the corresponding endocytic inhibitors (the same concentration as pre-incubation) and the cells treated only with nanoparticles were as control. After culturing for 3 h at 37 °C, the cells were washed with cold PBS, harvested and analyzed using flow cytometer. In addition, we investigated the effect of energy on endocytosis by measuring the corresponding uptakes of Dox/HCVs at 4 °C.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. The synthesis and characterization of HA-CDs
HA with too large MW has some limitations for Nano-DDS, such as large particle size, wide size distribution and high viscosity [31], [35], [40]. Therefore, we chose series HA with MW 7, 63 and 102 kDa to modify in the study. HA was successfully functionalized by HPCD with the aid of catalysts EDC and HOBT. The synthesis procedure of HA-CD was illustrated in Fig. S1 and the chemical structure was confirmed by 1H NMR, as shown in Fig. S2. Based on the 1H NMR spectra, the average degree of substitution was calculated to be about 50% HPCD grafting (Table S1) for three kinds of conjugates. In Fig. S3, by comparing the FT-IR spectra of HA, HPCD and HA-CD, a new specific band at 1755 cm−1 was observed in HA-CD due to the stretching vibration absorption of the formed ester linkage, confirming the successful synthesis of HA-CDs with three different HA MWs.
3.2. Characterization of Dox/HCVs
Dox/HCVs were prepared with a slight modification based on our previous study [36]. The long alkyl chains of VES could be inserted into the CD cavity with host-guest inclusion interaction, and the other hydrophobic segments of VES would constitute a hydrophobic core capable of loading Dox. The hydrophilic hyaluronan would surround the hydrophobic core, finally resulting in a core-shell nanostructure. The physiochemical and pharmaceutical characteristics of Dox/HCVs with three different HA MWs were summarized in Table 1. All nanoparticles showed a uniform size distribution and spherical shape morphology (Fig. 1A, B and Fig. S4), and possessed similar particle size (∼140 nm) and zeta potential (∼−30 mv). And the EE of three NPs were more than 90%. The similar characteristics of Dox/HCVs should be attributed to the tight hydrophobic core interaction. The change of average diameters of Dox/HCVs was observed for ten days stored at 4 °C. As shown in Fig. 1C, all Dox/HCVs had barely change in particle size, suggesting that the obtained preparations exhibited excellent colloidal stability. It might benefit from the good hydrophilic and surface negative charge of HA. The release behavior of Dox at 37 °C for 24 h under different pH conditions was carried out. As shown in Fig. 1D, the accumulative release of Dox from Dox/HCV-7 NPs in 6 h was only 8.37% at pH 7.4, 16.9% at pH 6.5, but 51.91% at pH 5, suggesting Dox release was pH-dependent which probably due to the protonation of doxorubicin at acidic environment [41], [42]. The similar pattern was found in Dox/HCV-63 and Dox/HCV-102, as shown in Fig. S5. The distinct release property would be in favorable for targeted drug delivery, since it could avoid the Dox leakage during blood circulation (physiology condition pH value∼7.4) while rapidly release drug once internalized by tumor cells (endosome and lysosome pH value 6.5–5 or even more lower).
Table 1.
Dox/HCVs | Size (nm) | PDI | Zeta (mv) | EE (%) | LD (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dox/HCV-7 | 137. 2 ± 1.65 | 0.17 ± 0.0004 | −31.5 ± 0.153 | 93.25 ± 2.007 | 2.66 ± 0.3867 |
Dox/HCV-63 | 141.1 ± 1.528 | 0.181 ± 0.014 | −33.9 ± 0.643 | 91.42 ± 3.8215 | 2.57 ± 0.28 |
Dox/HCV-102 | 140.7 ± 0.889 | 0.181 ± 0.058 | −33.2 ± 0.321 | 93.12 ± 1.6618 | 2.35 ± 0.1099 |
HA as an active targeting ligand for CD44 receptor has attracted great attention in Nano-DDS and many reports demonstrated the active targeting efficiency of Nano-DDS was MW-dependent. But some investigation results were only based on free HA rather than HA-modified NPs. In addition, the physicochemical characteristics of NPs such as particle size, shape, surface chemical composition and so on, have a significant influence on their cellular internalization and intracellular delivery [43], [44], but it was rarely taken into consideration in many studies. The three HA-based NPs we prepared had the similar physicochemical and pharmaceutical characteristics, it laid a significant fundamental for illuminating the relationship between HA MW and its active-targeting efficacy.
3.3. CD44 receptor expression analysis
CD44 is a transmembrane glycoprotein overexpressed on the surface of a variety of cancer cells and is the most primary receptor of HA. It has been reported that CD44 density has a great effect on targeting efficiency [31]. With the aim to identify the suitable cell models for the further studies, the expression levels of CD44 on several cancer cells were conducted by confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). In Fig. 2A, the strong fluorescence intensity could be observed on the cell membranes of Hela and H460 cells, indicating CD44 overexpression. By contrast, there was little fluorescence signal on MCF-7 and A549 cells, indicating CD44 low-expression. CD44 expression levels were also evaluated with flow cytometric method, as shown in Fig. 2B. The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) suggested that both Hela and H460 cells overexpressed CD44, but MCF-7 and A549 cells had a very low expression of CD44, which in consistent well with CLSM results. Next, Hela and H460 as positive cell models (CD44 + ), in contrast, MCF-7 and A549 as negative cell models (CD44-) were used for the following studies.
3.4. Influence of HA MW on cytotoxicity of Dox-loaded formulations
Fig. 3 illustrated the cytotoxicity of free Dox and various Dox/HCVs at different concentrations on four cancer cells for 48 h and Table 2 summarized the corresponding IC50 values. There existed a big difference for IC50 values of free Dox on four cancer cells, suggesting cytotoxicity being the cell type-dependent. In addition, among the three Dox-loaded NPs, there were different degrees of cytotoxic effects on Hela and H460 cells, but similar cytotoxicity on MCF-7 and A549 cells. It indicated that the targeting effect of Dox/HCVs was in a CD44-mediated manner and the HA MW may affect cytotoxic effect through adjusting cellular internalization capacity of NPs [38]. This result also agreed well with the previous results of CD44 expression. Furthermore, in comparison with Dox/HCV-7 and Dox/HCV-102, Dox/HCV-63 exhibited remarkably higher cytotoxicity on Hela cells (Fig. 3). It had the lowest IC50 values (36.2 nM), much lower than Dox/HCV-7 (78.7 nM) and Dox/HCV-102 (89.2 nM). Additionally, the similar trend could be found on H460 cells.
Table 2.
Dox/HCVs | Hela | H460 | A549 | MCF-7 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dox | 44.4 | 422.7 | 138.6 | 636.1 |
Dox/HCV-7 | 78.7 | 415.4 | 165.5 | 707.5 |
Dox/HCV-63 | 36.2 | 153.3 | 139.0 | 686.5 |
Dox/HCV-102 | 89.2 | 174.4 | 138.5 | 701.6 |
3.5. Effect of HA MW on cellular uptake of Dox/HCVs
We further measured the cellular uptakes of nanoparticles on CD44 + and CD44- cells at 37 °C for 1 h and 3 h by flow cytometry. As shown in Fig. 4, S6 and S7, all formulations exerted a stronger MFI at 3 h than those at 1 h, indicating a time-dependent cellular uptake. And Dox/HCVs nanoparticles presented different MFI values on CD44 + cells, in sharp contrast to those on CD44- cells, confirming that CD44 receptor played a vital role in HA-mediated active targeting. On CD44 + Hela and H460 cells, Dox/HCV-63 showed the highest uptake of Dox at 3 h in comparison to Dox/HCV-7 and Dox/HCV-102, in well consistent with their cytotoxic effects. But it was interesting that Dox/HCV-102 exerted the better cellular uptake than others after incubation for 1 h at 37 °C.
3.6. Potential mechanisms of nanoparticles endocytosis
Due to the endocytic pathway also has a strong effect on the intracellular delivery of Nano-DDS [45], we investigated the potential mechanisms of Dox/HCVs endocytosis. As shown in Fig. 5A, a dramatic decrease of cellular uptakes could be observed at 4 °C for Dox/HCVs, suggesting the cellular endocytosis of NPs was energy-consuming. Furthermore, several endocytic inhibitors were chosen to investigate the specific mechanisms. Chlorpromazine is an inhibitor interrupting the clathrin-dependent endocytosis by dissociating clathrin and adapter proteins from the membrane [45], and colchicine can block the macropinocytosis through interfering the microtubule transportation [46], while indomethacin and quercetin are inhibitors for caveolae-mediated endocytosis and caveolae-/clathrin-independent endocytosis respectively [47]. In Fig. 5A, HA MW had a negligible influence on their endocytic pathways. And the cellular uptakes of Dox/HCVs treated with chlorpromazine were significantly decreased by about 50%, but no significant changes were observed for other inhibitors. Those results indicated that the cellular internalization of Dox/HCVs was primarily mediated by clathrin-mediated endocytosis.
Aim to understand the role of CD44 receptor during NPs internalization, a competitive uptake inhibition was carried out on Hela cells pre-added excessive free HA with the largest molecule weight (102 kDa) to saturate the CD44 receptor by multivalent interactions. In Fig. 5B, the cellular uptakes of the three Dox/HCV NPs were all significantly decreased, further confirming CD44-dependent endocytosis for HA-based Nano-DDS [10], [48]. In addition, the decreasing percentages of Dox/HCV-7 (47.45%) and Dox/HCV-63 (50.97%) were slightly higher than Dox/HCV-102 (40.64%), owing to the highest binding affinity of 102 kDa HA with CD44 receptor [34].
3.7. Influence of HA MW on the binding affinity of Dox/HCVs
The binding affinity of Dox/HCVs to CD44 receptor was further estimated by measuring their cellular uptake at 4 °C for 3 h, which impedes the following endocytosis process after NPs binding to cell plasma membrane. As shown in Fig. 6 and Fig. S8, Dox/HCVs showed similar MFI as free Dox on CD44- cell lines, but higher MFI than free Dox on CD44 + cells, due to the specific HA-CD44 interaction. Comparing the MFI values of Dox/HCVs, their binding affinities followed an order of Dox/HCV-102>Dox/HCV-63>Dox/HCV-7, and the tendency was more apparent on Hela cells. This result agreed with the previous reports that higher MW HA exhibited greater affinity ability to CD44 via the multivalent binding interaction [30], [31], [32], [33], [49]. It might explain that Dox/HCV-102 exerted the better cellular uptake when incubation for 1 h at 37 °C (Fig. 4).
3.8. Effect of Dox/HCVs towards to CD44 receptors
Some studies reported that free large MW HA can trigger CD44 clustering but low MW HA or hyaluronidase can disrupt this process. And CD44 clustering not only involves in HA MW-dependent CD44-mediated cell signaling [20], [50], but also participates in regulating the binding ability of HA to CD44 receptors [51], [52], [53]. In addition, receptor clustering has been observed in some active targeting NPs based on integrins and epidermal growth factor receptor, and was reported to decrease the apparent binding affinity of ligand to receptor [54]. Inspired by those findings, we observed the change of CD44 receptors on Hela cells after incubation with blank NPs HCVs for periods of time using CLSM (Fig. 7). In the control group, the fluorescence signals of CD44 receptors were uniformly distributed on the cell surface. By contrast, some granular fluorescence points appeared in HCVs groups and the distribution of receptors was uneven when incubated for only 10 minutes, representing the formation of CD44 clustering, especially in HCV-102 group. Furthermore, more fluorescence signals could be found within cells, probably as the result of the internalization of CD44 receptors along with NPs into cells. It is known that HA is internalized into cells via CD44-mediated endocytosis and then delivered to endosomes, finally transferred and degraded within the lysosomes [20], [22], [55]. With the increase in incubation time, increased CD44 clustering could be found, in particular for the HCV-102 group.
Above results indicated that HCV-102 induced more CD44 receptor clustering than HCV-7 and HCV-63. It might affect the overall targeting efficiency by decreasing the available number of CD44 receptors [56]. To a certain degree, it led to the lower cellular uptake at 3 h and cytotoxicity of Dox/HCV-102 when compared with Dox/HCV-63. Ultimately, binding affinity might be the rate-limiting step of cellular internalization at the early stage, but the apparent targeting efficacy was the combined result of binding affinity and induced CD44 clustering.
4. Conclusion
In this work, the three active targeting Nano-DDS with different MWs HA (7, 63, and 102 kDa) were prepared for exploring the effects of HA MW on the targeting efficiency. The three Dox/HCVs NPs had the similar physiochemical and pharmaceutical properties. Furthermore, the cell proliferation inhibition and cellular uptake experiments indicated that Dox/HCV-63 manifested better active targeting ability than Dox/HCV-7 and Dox/HCV-102. It was found that HA MW could tune the active targeting capacity of HA-based NPs via modulated binding affinity and induced CD44 clustering effect in a conflicting manner. The results might lay a reliable foundation and provide relative theoretical guidance for rationally designing HA-based Nano-DDS.
Conflicts of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (No. 81573371) and the key projects of Liaoning Province Department of Education (No. 2017LZD03).
Footnotes
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.ajps.2018.11.002.
Contributor Information
Jin Sun, Email: sunjin@syphu.edu.cn.
Zhonggui He, Email: hezhgui_student@aliyun.com.
Appendix. Supplementary materials
References
- 1.Wang R, Li L, Zhang S. A novel enediyne-integrated antibody-drug conjugate shows promising anti-tumor efficacy against CD30(+) lymphomas. Mol Oncol. 2018;12(3):339–355. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Xiang D, Shigdar S, Qiao G. Nucleic acid aptamer-guided cancer therapeutics and diagnostics: the next generation of cancer medicine. Theranostics. 2015;5:23–42. doi: 10.7150/thno.10202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sun Y, Gan W, Lei M. PEPT1-mediated prodrug strategy for oral delivery of peramivir. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2018;13(6):555–565. doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2018.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Stephen L., Hayward CLW, Kidambi S. Hyaluronic acid-conjugated liposome nanoparticles for targeted delivery to CD44 overexpressing glioblastoma cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7(23):34158–34171. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wang Z, Guo W, Kuang X, Hou S, Liu H. Nanopreparations for mitochondria targeting drug delivery system: current strategies and future prospective. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2017;12:498–508. doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2017.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bhutia YD, Babu E, Prasad PD, Ganapathy V. The amino acid transporter SLC6A14 in cancer and its potential use in chemotherapy. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2014;9:293–303. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhang P, He D, Klein PM. Enhanced intracellular protein transduction by sequence defined tetra-oleoyl oligoaminoamides targeted for cancer therapy. Adv Funct Mater. 2015;25:6627–6636. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Necas J, Bartosikova L, Brauner P, Kolar J. Hyaluronic acid (hyaluronan): a review. Vet Med. 2008;53:397–411. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Glucksam-Galnoy Y, Zor T, Margalit R. Hyaluronan-modified and regular multilamellar liposomes provide sub-cellular targeting to macrophages, without eliciting a pro-inflammatory response. J Control Release. 2012;160:388–393. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhong Y, Goltsche K, Cheng L. Hyaluronic acid-shelled acid-activatable paclitaxel prodrug micelles effectively target and treat CD44-overexpressing human breast tumor xenografts in vivo. Biomaterials. 2016;84:250–261. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Noh I, Kim HO, Choi J. Co-delivery of paclitaxel and gemcitabine via CD44-targeting nanocarriers as a prodrug with synergistic antitumor activity against human biliary cancer. Biomaterials. 2015;53:763–774. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Martens TF, Remaut K, Deschout H. Coating nanocarriers with hyaluronic acid facilitates intravitreal drug delivery for retinal gene therapy. J Control Release. 2015;202:83–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.01.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang C, Ye Y, Hochu GM, Sadeghifar H, Gu Z. Enhanced cancer immunotherapy by microneedle patch-assisted delivery of anti-PD1 antibody. Nano Lett. 2016;16:2334–2340. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yang X, Iyer AK, Singh A. MDR1 siRNA loaded hyaluronic acid-based CD44 targeted nanoparticle systems circumvent paclitaxel resistance in ovarian cancer. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8509. doi: 10.1038/srep08509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fonte P, Araujo F, Silva C. Polymer-based nanoparticles for oral insulin delivery: revisited approaches. Biotechnol Adv. 2015;33:1342–1354. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Makris EA, Gomoll AH, Malizos KN, Hu JC, Athanasiou KA. Repair and tissue engineering techniques for articular cartilage. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015;11:21–34. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Takeda K, Sakai N, Shiba H. Characteristics of high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid as a brain-derived neurotrophic factor scaffold in periodontal tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011;17:955–967. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dosio F, Arpicco S, Stella B, Fattal E. Hyaluronic acid for anticancer drug and nucleic acid delivery. Adv Drug Deliver Rev. 2016;97:204–236. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mattheolabakis G, Milane L, Singh A, Amiji MM. Hyaluronic acid targeting of CD44 for cancer therapy: from receptor biology to nanomedicine. J Drug Target. 2015;23:605–618. doi: 10.3109/1061186X.2015.1052072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Choi KY, Saravanakumar G, Park JH, Park K. Hyaluronic acid-based nanocarriers for intracellular targeting: interfacial interactions with proteins in cancer. Colloid Surf B. 2012;99:82–94. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.10.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.D'Agostino A, Stellavato A, Corsuto L. Is molecular size a discriminating factor in hyaluronan interaction with human cells? Carbohydr Polym. 2017;157:21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Harada H, Takahashi M. CD44-dependent intracellular and extracellular catabolism of hyaluronic acid by hyaluronidase-1 and -2. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:5597–5607. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M608358200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yen J, Ying H, Wang H, Yin L, Uckun F, Cheng J. CD44 Mediated nonviral gene delivery into human embryonic stem cells via hyaluronic-acid-coated nanoparticles. ACS Biomater – Sci Eng. 2016;2:326–335. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sun D, Zhou JK, Zhao L. Novel curcumin liposome modified with hyaluronan targeting CD44 plays an anti-leukemic role in acute myeloid leukemia in vitro and in vivo. ACS Appl Mater Inter. 2017;9:16857–16868. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b02863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lin CW, Lu KY, Wang SY, Sung HW, Mi FL. CD44-specific nanoparticles for redox-triggered reactive oxygen species production and doxorubicin release. Acta Biomater. 2016;35:280–292. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shah KN, Ditto AJ, Crowder DC. Receptor-mediated attachment and uptake of hyaluronan conjugates by breast cancer cells. Mol Pharm. 2017;14:3968–3977. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kim JE, Park YJ. High paclitaxel-loaded and tumor cell-targeting hyaluronan-coated nanoemulsions. Colloid Surf B. 2017;150:362–372. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.10.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Maharjan AS, Pilling D, Gomer RH. High and low molecular weight hyaluronic acid differentially regulate human fibrocyte differentiation. PLoS One. 2011;6:e26078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Misra S, Hascall VC, Markwald RR, Ghatak S. Interactions between hyaluronan and its receptors (CD44, RHAMM) regulate the activities of inflammation and cancer. Front Immunol. 2015;6:201. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Li J, He Y, Sun W. Hyaluronic acid-modified hydrothermally synthesized iron oxide nanoparticles for targeted tumor MR imaging. Biomaterials. 2014;35:3666–3677. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Qhattal HS, Liu X. Characterization of CD44-mediated cancer cell uptake and intracellular distribution of hyaluronan-grafted liposomes. Mol Pharm. 2011;8:1233–1246. doi: 10.1021/mp2000428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Arpicco S, Lerda C, Dalla Pozza E. Hyaluronic acid-coated liposomes for active targeting of gemcitabine. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2013;85:373–380. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mizrahy S, Goldsmith M, Leviatan-Ben-Arye S. Tumor targeting profiling of hyaluronan-coated lipid based-nanoparticles. Nanoscale. 2014;6:3742–3752. doi: 10.1039/c3nr06102g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mizrahy S, Raz SR, Hasgaard M. Hyaluronan-coated nanoparticles: the influence of the molecular weight on CD44-hyaluronan interactions and on the immune response. J Control Release. 2011;156:231–238. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.06.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li W, Zheng C, Pan Z. Smart hyaluronidase-actived theranostic micelles for dual-modal imaging guided photodynamic therapy. Biomaterials. 2016;101:10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Han X, Li Z, Sun J. Stealth CD44-targeted hyaluronic acid supramolecular nanoassemblies for doxorubicin delivery: probing the effect of uncovalent pegylation degree on cellular uptake and blood long circulation. J Control Release. 2015;197:29–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.10.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Liu Y, Zhai Y, Han X. Bioadhesive chitosan-coated cyclodextrin-based superamolecular nanomicelles to enhance the oral bioavailability of doxorubicin. J Nanopart Res. 2014;16(10):2587. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lallana E, Rios de la Rosa JM, Tirella A. Chitosan/hyaluronic acid nanoparticles: rational design revisited for RNA delivery. Mol Pharm. 2017;14:2422–2436. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ai X, Sun J, Zhong L. Star-shape redox-responsive PEG-sheddable copolymer of disulfide-linked polyethylene glycol-lysine-di-tocopherol succinate for tumor-triggering intracellular doxorubicin rapid release: head-to-head comparison. Macromol Biosci. 2014;14:1415–1428. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201400149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yin S, Huai J, Chen X. Intracellular delivery and antitumor effects of a redox-responsive polymeric paclitaxel conjugate based on hyaluronic acid. Acta Biomater. 2015;26:274–285. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.08.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Qiu LY, Yan L, Zhang L, Jin YM, Zhao QH. Folate-modified poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) as hydrophilic corona in polymeric micelles for enhanced intracellular doxorubicin delivery. Int J Pharm. 2013;456:315–324. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.08.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Guo H, Zhang D, Li C. Self-assembled nanoparticles based on galactosylated O-carboxymethyl chitosan-graft-stearic acid conjugates for delivery of doxorubicin. Int J Pharm. 2013;458:31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhang S, Gao H, Bao G. Physical principles of nanoparticle cellular endocytosis. ACS Nano. 2015;9:8655–8671. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b03184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mao Z, Zhou X, Gao C. Influence of structure and properties of colloidal biomaterials on cellular uptake and cell functions. Biomater Sci. 2013;1(9):896–911. doi: 10.1039/c3bm00137g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Vercauteren D, Rejman J, Martens TF, Demeester J, De Smedt SC, Braeckmans K. On the cellular processing of non-viral nanomedicines for nucleic acid delivery: mechanisms and methods. J Control Release. 2012;161:566–581. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Swanson JA, Watts C. Macropinocytosis. Trends Cell Biol. 1995;5:424–428. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)89101-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chang J, Jallouli Y, Kroubi M. Characterization of endocytosis of transferrin-coated PLGA nanoparticles by the blood-brain barrier. Int J Pharm. 2009;379:285–292. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.04.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhang J, Sun Y, Tian B. Multifunctional mesoporous silica nanoparticles modified with tumor-shedable hyaluronic acid as carriers for doxorubicin. Colloid Surf B. 2016;144:293–302. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dalla Pozza E, Lerda C, Costanzo C. Targeting gemcitabine containing liposomes to CD44 expressing pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells causes an increase in the antitumoral activity. BBA-Biomembranes. 2013;1828:1396–1404. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yang C, Cao M, Liu H. The high and low molecular weight forms of hyaluronan have distinct effects on CD44 clustering. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:43094–43107. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.349209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhang G, Zhang H, Liu Y. CD44 clustering is involved in monocyte differentiation. Acta Bioch Bioph Sin. 2014;46:540–547. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmu042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wang Y, Yago T, Zhang N. Cytoskeletal regulation of CD44 membrane organization and Interactions with E-selectin. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:35159–35171. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.600767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Perschl A, Lesley J, English N, Trowbridge I, Hyman R. Role of CD44 cytoplasmic domain in hyaluronan binding. Eur J Immunol. 1995;25:495–501. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830250228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Guo Z, He B, Jin H. Targeting efficiency of RGD-modified nanocarriers with different ligand intervals in response to integrin alphavbeta3 clustering. Biomaterials. 2014;35:6106–6117. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Culty M, Nguyen HA, Underhill CB. The hyaluronan receptor (CD44) participates in the uptake and degradation of hyaluronan. J Cell Biol. 1992;116:1055–1062. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.4.1055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Almalik A, Karimi S, Ouasti S. Hyaluronic acid (HA) presentation as a tool to modulate and control the receptor-mediated uptake of HA-coated nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2013;34:5369–5380. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.