Skip to main content
Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences logoLink to Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
. 2018 Oct 22;14(5):480–496. doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2018.09.005

Nanocarriers as a powerful vehicle to overcome blood-brain barrier in treating neurodegenerative diseases: Focus on recent advances

Xiaoqian Niu a, Jiejian Chen a,b, Jianqing Gao a,
PMCID: PMC7032222  PMID: 32104476

Abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis throw a heavy burden on families and society. Related scientific researches make tardy progress. One reason is that the known pathogeny is just the tip of the iceberg. Another reason is that various physiological barriers, especially blood-brain barrier (BBB), hamper effective therapeutic substances from reaching site of action. Drugs in clinical treatment of neurodegenerative diseases are basically administered orally. And generally speaking, the brain targeting efficiency is pretty low. Nano-delivery technology brings hope for neurodegenerative diseases. The use of nanocarriers encapsulating molecules such as peptides and genomic medicine may enhance drug transport through the BBB in neurodegenerative disease and target relevant regions in the brain for regenerative processes. In this review, we discuss BBB composition and applications of nanocarriers -liposomes, nanoparticles, nanomicelles and new emerging exosomes in neurodegenerative diseases. Furthermore, the disadvantages and the potential neurotoxicity of nanocarriers according pharmacokinetics theory are also discussed.

Keyword: Neurodegenerative diseases, Blood-brain barrier, Nanocarriers, Neurotoxicity

Graphical abstract

Image, graphical abstract

1. Introduction

The real cause of neurodegenerative disease is like a mystery and still under research. Neurodegenerative disease including Alzheimer's disease(AD), Parkinson's disease(PD), Huntington disease(HD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis(ALS). AD is the most common form of dementia and contribute to 60%–70% of the cases. Extracellular deposits of Aβ peptide and intraneuronal accumulations of tau protein in the brain are the main histopathological features of AD [1]. PD is another chronic progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra and pathological aggregation of the intrinsically disordered protein α-synuclein into Lewy bodies [2],which affects 1% of the population over 65 years old [3]. ALS is an incurable and fatal progressive degenerative disease involving motoneuron cell death. And the pathophysiology is complex and the causes of motoneuron degeneration still awaits clarification [4]. HD, a genetic neurodegenerative disease, is caused by abnormal trinucleotide repeat sequences (CAG) expansion [5].

There are limited clinical treatments for neurodegenerative diseases which almost cannot cure but only slow down the disease progress. Indeed, in the clinical treatment of AD, only four drugs have been available since mid-1990s, including the cholinesterase inhibitors donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine and the glutamatergic antagonist memantine [6].Compared with the drugs used in the treatment of AD, the therapy is more limited than the one described for PD, HD and ALS. Some valuable treatment substances, such as peptides [7], [8], [9], [10] and genomic medicines [11], [12], [13] usually cannot reach the site of action because of the existence of BBB and their poor access to the brain, extensive first-pass metabolism and possible side effects when reaching non-target peripheral tissues.

The fragile brain parenchyma is protected from the periphery by the BBB [14], which is consisted of polarized endothelial cells connected by tight junctions of the cerebral capillary endothelium and plenty of transporters, resulting extremely low permeability and limiting the delivery of drugs to the central nervous system (CNS) [15], [16].BBB functionality is dynamically regulated by an ensemble of different cell types, such as astrocytes, pericytes, and neurons [17]. In fact, 98% of all potent drugs that may improve therapy of various diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) are not in clinic because of their inability to cross the BBB [18]. Most hydrophilic molecules are unable to cross the BBB because of the compact linking between the brain endothelial cells which prevents paracellular transport. At the same time, the limited cross BBB ability of major lipophilic small molecules is caused by efflux transporters like the p-glycoprotein (Pgp), multidrug related protein (MRP) or breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) transporters [19], [20], [21]. A host of brain-targeting researches were carry on glioma [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. Although the structure and function of BBB can be changed in neurodegenerative diseases, the barrier function of BBB is still a main obstacle in the treatment neurodegenerative diseases [28], [29], [30], [31], [32]. It is of prime significance to investigate different vehicles which can enhance the BBB transport bility of therapeutic drugs to target area.

There are a number of receptors present on the surface of BBB, particularly for different proteins, peptides, antibodies. Such molecules are used as surface-active ligands and assist the translocation via receptor-mediated transcytosis (Fig. 1). At the same time, the cationic vehicle crosses the BBB via absorption mediated transcytosis. One more strategy is vehicle mediated transcytosis that utilizes some nutrients like glucose and glutathione, binding to the surface of vehicle and facilitating its translocation [33], [34]. Some examples of commonly used nanocarriers are liposomes, nanoparticles, nanomicelles and exosomes. Drug delivery using nanocarriers may increase the bioavailability and stability of drugs and decrease the peripheral toxicity.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Schematic representation of the BBB and various transport processes across the brain endothelial layer.

2. Liposomes: classic dosage form to penetrate BBB

Liposomes with structure similar to cell membrane are biodegradable colloids and can be employed to carry a wide range of hydrophobic and hydrophilic pharmaceuticals, such as small molecules [35], peptides [36], proteins [37] and RNAs [38], without changing their function and protecting them against degradation and potential immune responses [39] (Fig. 2). Its unique phospholipid bilayer structure which is similar to physiological membrane had made it easier to penetrate BBB and helps therapeutic molecules to enter the brain. They are probably the most studied and clinically recognized nanocarriers owing to their long track record, low toxicity and ability to deliver both hydrophilic and lipophilic compounds [40]. However, there are several limitations of liposomes, including fast systemic elimination, quick metabolic degradation of the phospholipids, stability issue after extended storage, inability to provide sustained release of drugs and moderately efficient for the entrapment of lipophilic compounds [41].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

A schematic representation of classical liposome.

Nowadays, a plenty of modifications have been made in the liposomal surface to improve its brain targeting ability. With the help of some specific ligands (glucose [42], lactoferrin [43], transferrin [44], specific peptides [45]), liposome can efficiently crosses the BBB and deliver the drug to the particular site (Table 1).

Table 1.

Current knowledge of possible liposomes as vehicle in treating neurodegenerative diseases.

Surface modify Model drug Use Mechanism of action Size Model of use Result Refs.
Glutathione targeted PEGylated(GSH-PEG) Antibody fragment VHH-pa2H AD To elongate blood residential time of the VHH and to deliver them across the BBB, without modifying the VHH itself 110 nm APPswe/PS1dE9 double transgenic mice GSH-PEG liposomes encapsulated VHH showed a significant increase in retention in brains of transgenic mice as compared to wildtype controls [52]
GSH-PEG liposomes Carboxyfluorescein (CF) AD Compared the pharmacokinetics and organ distribution of GSH-PEG liposomes using an autoquenched fluorescent tracer after intraperitoneal administration and intravenous administration No mention Endothelial cells GSH-PEG liposomes were specifically taken up by rat brain endothelial cells [53]
Curcumin-conjugated liposomes Curcumin AD Curcumin was a fluorescent molecule with high affinity for the Aβ peptide but its low solubility limits its clinical use. Used curcumin's affinity for Aβ to target the liposomes to Aβ deposits 63–200 nm APPxPS1 mice. Demonstrated strong labeling of Aβ deposits both in human tissue and in mice, and in vitro downregulation of amyloid peptide secretion and prevention of Aβ-induced toxicity [139]
Lf/NGF-liposomes Neuron growth factor (NGF) AD NGF could prevent basal forebrain cholinergic neurons from retrograded degeneration. Incorporation with polyethylene glycol (PEG) on liposomes could avoid colloidal aggregations, fusions, and coalescences and sterically stabilize the particles. Lf receptors, located on HBMECs, could benefit endocytosis of Lf via receptormediated transcytosis (RMT) and permeation through the BBB 100 nm SK-N-MC cells Lf/NGF-liposomes comprising cholesterol and DPPC were physically stable with high biocompatibility to HBMECs and HAs. Surface Lf was efficient in transporting Lf/NGF-liposomes across the BBB and inhibiting the degeneration of SK-N-MC cells with Aβ-induced neurotoxicity [140]
(ApoE)-derived peptides-nanoliposomes Curcumin HD Nanoparticles interacting with the LDLr via a specific apolipoprotein E (ApoE) amino acid sequence could be transported across the BBB by transcytosis, bypassing the lysosomal degradation. Curcumin has putative therapeutic properties in neurodegenerative diseases 132 ± 10 nm Rat brain endothelial cell line NLs functionalized with dApoE-peptide at HD could serve as versatile “nanovehicles” to deliver curcumin across the BBB, by providing a sheltered hydrophobic microenvironment, decreasing drug degradation, and therefore increasing its brain bioavailability [141]
Transferrin (Tf) modified lipsomes α-Mangostin AD The efficacy of α-Mangostin was limited by the poor penetration of the drug through the BBB. Transferrin (Tf) was used as a targeting ligand to modify the liposome to achieve the desired penetrating effects. 196.3 ± 7.09 nm SD rats and BBB model (astrocytes and the bEnd3 cells) Qualitative and quantitative experiments proved that the Tf-liposome could promote the brain-targeting ability [47]
mApoE–PA–LIP Oligomers AD Liposomes were bifunctionalized with a peptide derived from the apolipoprotein-E receptor-binding domain for blood–brain barrier targeting and with phosphatidic acid for Aβ binding 121 ± 7 nm APP23 transgenic mice (aged 15 months) Bifunctionalized liposomes destabilized brain Aβ aggregates and promoted peptide removal across the BBB and its peripheral clearance [61]
TREG-Mab-ApoE-LIPs Derivative of curcumin (TREG) AD TREG demonstrated a strong inhibitory action towards Aβ peptide aggregation; Mab-ApoE had high affinity for the BBB Below 200 nm FVB mice The current results revealed the potential of the specific curcumin-lipid derivative as a component of multifunctional LIPs with efficient brain targeting capability [142]
Chlorotoxin-modified stealth liposomes Levodopa PD Chlorotoxin (ClTx) specifically binded to the brain gliomas and proliferating vascular endothelial cells. In this paper, it was first used to establish the ClTx-modified stealth liposomes (ClTx-LS) encapsulating levodopa (LD) for the targeting drug delivery 100 nm MPTP-induced C57 mice PD model The in vitro and in vivo results showed good correlation with each other and both proved the hypothesis that ClTx -LS may be a potential active targeting system to enhance the drug delivery into the brain to achieve a better PD therapy [143]

2.1. Transferrin modified liposomes

Liposomes can be conjugated to either transferrin protein or transferrin monoclonal antibody such as OX-26 [46]. Our previous study constructed liposomes modified by transferrin (Tf)loading the a potential candidate AD drug, α- Mangostin (α-M). In vitro studies demonstrated that the Tf(α-M) liposome could cross the BBB in the form of an integrated liposome and in vivo studies on the α-M distribution in the brain demonstrated that the Tf (α-M) liposome improved the brain delivery of α-M [47]. Transferrin receptors (TfR) as one of receptors, are of special interest for delivery therapeutic agents across BBB in order to enhance the targeting efficiency [14]. The receptor is a transmembrane glycoprotein with two subunits of 90 kDa that are linked by a disulfide bridge, and each of these subunits can bind to one molecule of transferrin [48]. However, as a target delivery system, there are some problems about TfR must be emphasized.

  • (1)

    TfR is also expressed on hepatocytes, monocytes, erythrocytes, intestinal cells, epithelial cells of choroid plexus and neurons besides BBB. Thus, TfR targeted liposomes also have a high distribution in the liver and kidneys [49].

  • (2)

    The high concentration of transferrin present in serum (∼2 μmol/l) creates a significant problem, since any TfR expressed on endothelial cells is typically saturated with endogenous transferrin under physiological conditions [50]. So the targeting ability is not efficient enough.

2.2. Glutathione modified liposomes

The sodium-dependent (active) glutathione transporter, as another mention receptor, also has a preferential expression in CNS and BBB and is present in all mammalian species [51]. Glutathione (GSH) is an endogenous tripeptide that plays a central role in the detoxification of intracellular metabolites, which has a well-established and good safety profile by exogenously administration. The GSH-PEG liposomes whether based on 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine(DMPC) or egg-yolk phosphatidylcholine (EYPC), both encapsulated 15 kDa amyloid beta binding llama single domain antibody fragments (VHH-pa2H), showed a rather slower blood clearance profile and a higher concentration amount in perfused brains on statistics than free VHH-pa2H, which provided evidence that the glutathione was suitable for specific delivery of targeted drugs, antibody fragments beyond the BBB into the brain [52]. The brain target ability of GSH-PEG liposomes were also proved by using fluorescent tracer, carboxyfluorescein (CF). Significantly more fluorescent tracer was found in RBE4 cell homogenates incubated with GSH-PEG liposomes compared to non-targeted PEG liposomes and 4-fold higher brain levels of fluorescent tracer was found after intravenous injection of GSH-PEG liposomes compared with PEG control liposomes in the microdialysis study [53].

2.3. Cationic liposomes

Among all the modification in the liposomes, cationic liposomal drug vehicles are widely used, which would be able to take advantage of the BBB's negative charge and consequently trigger the cell internalization processes through electrostatic interactions [54], [55]. The effect of liposome surface charge on brain tissue uptake was investigated by injection of cationic, anionic, and charge-neutral liposomes into the internal carotid arteries of Sprague–Dawley rats [55],which showed surface charge mediates cellular interactions of liposomes: both positive and negatively charged liposomes interacted with cells more extensively than non-charged liposomes but the cationic liposome had the highest concentration in brain [56], [57], [58]. However, anionic phospholipids(phosphatidic acid and cardiolipin) is applied to form liposome showing excellent affinity to neurotoxic beta-amyloid peptide (Aβ) [59], which demonstrated that cationic liposome have advantage to cross BBB while anionic liposome is excellent in beta-amyloid peptide targeting.

2.4. PEG modified liposomes

Coating liposomes with polyethylene glycol (PEG) further ensures a prolonged circulation time in plasma allowing prolonged dosing intervals and enhanced the chemical stability of the liposomes in serum, which have been applied widely and studied extensively [60]. Significantly, PEG of different chain length has effect on the brain-targeting efficiency. Thus in this study, the characteristics of glucose-modified liposomes using PEGs with different chain lengths (PEG200, PEG400, PEG1000, and PEG2000) as the linkers were compared and evaluated both in vitro and in vivo in order to explore their difference and determine the optimal length of PEG for drug delivery [42]. The result suggested that glucose-modified liposomes linked by PEGs with longer chain length showed a better efficiency to promote the drug transport across the BBB barrier in a time-dependent manner and liposomes linked by PEG1000 showed the best brain-targeted property at each time point in vivo experiment. It is because PEG with longer chain length may decrease the brain-targeted efficiency of the liposome because of the steric hindrance, while PEG with shorter chain length may obstruct the exposure of the ligand.

2.5. Multifunctional liposomes

Multifunctional liposomes were also used in treating AD, aiming to target sequentially. Liposomes were bifunctionalized with a peptide derived from the apolipoprotein-E receptor-binding domain for blood–brain barrier targeting and with phosphatidic acid for Aβ binding, which destabilized brain Aβ aggregates and promoted peptide removing across the BBB and its peripheral clearance [61]. Similarly, multifunctional liposomes were also used in treating glioma to realize dual-targeting effect and precision distribution in the brain. Dual-targeting doxorubincin(Dox) liposomes were produced by conjugating liposomes with both folate and transferrin, which were proven effective in penetrating the BBB and targeting tumor [62].

3. Nanoparticles: inorganic materials and organic materials

Nanoparticles are colloidal systems with compact structure where the therapeutic agent is either entrapped within the colloid matrix or coated on the particle surface by conjugation or adsorption [41]. Nanoparticles, using inorganic materials and organic materials as the core to permeate BBB, have been further studied in recent years (Table 2). Inorganic materials include gold, iron, cerium, molybdenum, silica while organic materials cover trehalose, PLGA and PLA. The reason why nanoparticles are being widely used in treating neurodegenerative disease is that they show distinct characteristics as follows.

  • (1)

    Nanoparticles possess relatively high drug loading and small size, and deliver the active ingredient to the specific site at a controlled and sustained rate during the transportation.

  • (2)

    Nanoparticles, especially inorganic nanoparticles, show excellent imaging performance.

  • (3)

    Part of the nanoparticles material themselves have a certain cure efficacy, such antioxidant, reducing ROS level and even inhibiting Aβ aggregation. It makes nanoparticles as pretty promising vehicles in neurodegenerative treatment.

Table 2.

Current knowledge of possible nanoparticles as vehicle in treating neurodegenerative diseases.

Nanoparticles Model drug Use Mechanism of action Size Imagining Model of use Result Refs.
TAT-NFH-nBSA Non-Fe hemin (NFH) PD Iron chelation therapeutic nanoparticles protected by a PMPC to delay the saturation of iron chelators in blood circulation and prolong the in vivo lifetime, with HIV-1 trans-activating transcriptor (TAT) serving as a shuttle to enhance the BBB permeability 24 nm No MPTP-induced PD mice The therapeutic nanoparticles TAT-NFH-nBSA could efficiently accumulate in the brain and produce a powerful neuroprotective effect both in vitroand in vivo for PD treatment. These findings indicated that this novel iron chelator system with a high affinity for Fe ions, long in vivo lifetime, and delayed saturation feature can be a valuable tool for PD therapy in the future [75]
mPEG–PLGA nanoparticles Schisantherin A(SA) PD Encapsuled SA in a nanoparticle formulation that extended SA circulation in the bloodstream and consequently an increased brain uptake and thus to be potentially efficacious for the treatment of PD 70 nm No Larval Zebrafish Brain delivery of SA was much more effective with SA-NPs than with SA suspension. In addition, the SA-NPs exerted strong neuroprotective effects in zebrafish and cell culture models of PD [93]
Fe3O4 coated with (NIPAm-AA) and modified oleic acid molecules shRNA and nerve growth factor (NGF) PD Combined gene therapy methods with cell targeting and a drug-controlled release system to prevent the overexpression of α-syn 290 nm Yes MPTP-induced chronic PD model Superparamagnetic nanoparticles could provide effective repair in a PD model in vitro and in vivo and further inhibit apoptosis. As a result, α-syn expression was reduced, thus preventing the toxic effects of α-syn on the cell and suppressing apoptosis [79]
(VCD10)@AuNP and (LCA10)@AuNP VCD10 peptide and LCA10 peptide AD Conjugated peptide inhibitors derived from different Aβ regions onto the AuNPs, yielding different peptide@AuNPs conjugates 15 ± 1.2 nm Yes Mechanistic model These structural features promoted its synergetic interactions with Aβ on AuNP surface, leading to strong inhibitions of Aβ oligomerization and fibrillation and the cytotoxicity caused by the aggregation species [64]
PEG-PLA-TGN peptides-QSH peptides H102 peptide AD Multi-functionalized nanoparticle system based on PEG-PLA, modified with TGN peptides as the BBB ligand and QSH peptides for the Aβ42-binding (TQNP) to target amyloid plaques in the brain 100 nm No APP/PS1 mice TQNP/H102 obtained better ability in decreasing amyloid plaques, increasing Aβ-degrading enzymes, reducing tau protein phosphorylation, protecting synapses and improving the spatial learning and memory of transgenic mice than nanoparticles modified with a single ligand [95]
PLGA-g7-curcumin Curcumin AD Encapsulate Curcumin as active ingredient in PLGA nanoparticles, modified with g7 ligand for BBB crossing 100–250 nm No Hippocampal cells No apparent toxicity of the formulated NPs, but a significant decrease of Aβ aggregates in response to Curcumin loaded NPs [92]
PLGA-OX26-anti-Aβ (DE2B4) -iAβ5 iAβ5 AD To improve drug transport through the BBB, PLGA nanoparticles with surface functionalized with anti-transferrin receptor monoclonal antibody (OX26) and anti-Aβ (DE2B4) deliver encapsulated iAβ5 into the brain 153 ± 2 nm No Porcine brain capillary endothelial cells It was a promising system after optimization (drug loading, surface density) to protect anti-amyloid peptides from proteolytic degradation and to increase their transport through BBB. [94]
Dextran-coated Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) Osmotin (OMNP) AD Under the functionalized magnetic field (FMF) conditions, dextran-coated Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) loaded with osmotin (OMNP) were transported to the brains of Aβ1–42-treated mice 200–390 nm Yes Aβ1–42-treated mice Based on these results, the combination of osmotin and a magnetic nanoparticle-based delivery system with external functional magnetic guidance may open new avenues for therapeutic approaches for the treatment of various chronic and metabolic diseases, including neurodegenerative diseases such as AD [77]
Anthocyanin-loaded PEG-gold nanoparticles Anthocyanin AD PEG-coated AuNPs were applied in this research study because of their characteristics of a biologically harmless,biocompatible,and effective drug delivery device 135 ± 5 nm Yes Aβ1-42-injected mice Results clearly demonstrated that anthocyanins conjugated with PEG-AuNPs can pass through BBB and showed no significant cytotoxic effect in the neuronal cells. Furthermore, anthocyanin-loaded PEG-AuNPs showed positive effects against Aβ1-42-induced neurodegeneration and anti-inflammation via the NF-kB/JNK/GSK3β signaling pathway [65]
Zwitterionic poly(trehalose) nanoparticles Trehalose HD Zwitterionic surface chemistry of nanoparticles is ideal for efficient cellular uptake with minimum cytotoxicity. Presumed that such surface chemistry combined with the intact chemical structure of trehalose and the optimum trehalose multivalency may further enhance the in vitro/in vivo performance of trehalose 20–30 nm No Transgenic mice for HD The designed poly(trehalose) nanoparticles were 1000–10,000 times more efficient than molecular trehalose in inhibiting protein fibrillation in extra-cellular space, in blocking aggregation of polyglutamine containing mutant huntingtin protein in model neuronal cells, and in suppressing mutant huntingtin aggregates in HD mouse brain [98]
Cerium oxide nanoparticles No ALS CeNPs might provide similar therapeutic benefit in a murine model of ALS 3.3 nm No SOD1G93A mouse model of ALS Using a murine model of ALS, twice per week intravenous administration of 20 mg/kg CeNPs prolonged survival of SOD1G93A transgenic mice even when treatment was started late at the onset of muscle weakness [87]
Nerve growth factor (NGF) functionalized superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-gold (Au) No Neuroregeneration NGF was essential for neuronal growth and differentiation .However, slow diffusion and short half-life of NGF from the enzyme degradation had restricted its application in neuroregeneration 20.8 nm Yes PC-12 cells The cellular differentiation ratio increased 58%; the neurite length elongation increased 63% [144]
CeNC/IONC/MSN-T807 Methylene blue AD Methylene blue, a tau aggregation inhibitor, was loaded on nanocomposite (CeNC/IONC/MSN-T807), which not only possessed high binding affinity to hyperphosphorylated tau but also inhibited multiple key pathways of tau-associated AD pathogenesis 51 ± 5 nm Yes Male Sprague–Dawley rats The memory deficits of AD rats were significantly rescued upon treatment with MB loaded CeNC/IONC/MSN-T807 [145]
Poly(trehalose) Nanoparticles No HD The nanoparticles had a hydrodynamic size of 20–30 nm and were composed of a 6 nm iron oxide core and a zwitterionic polymer shell containing ∼5%–12%(w/w) Covalently linked trehalose 20–30 nm Yes HD transgenic mouse Anoscale trehalose could offer highly efficient antiamyloidogenic performance at micromolar concentration, compared with millimollar to molar concentrations for molecular trehalose [98]

Although the nanoparticles present a series of superior performance, some problems still should be highlighted, such as particle aggregation, nano-toxicity and use of organic solvents during fabrication.

3.1. Gold nanoparticles

Among various nanoparticles, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) have intrigued great interest because of their relative low cytotoxicity, predominant optical properties fit for detection/imaging, well-established synthesis methods, and the potential capability to cross the BBB by altering size or coupling various modified ligand. Besides, gold nanoparticles themselves can prevent cognitive deficits, oxidative stress and inflammation in AD rat model [63], which suggested that gold nanoparticles may be a prospective material for AD.

Peptide inhibitors, VVIA and LPFFD [64] and antioxidant anthocyanin [65] were also loaded in AuNPs, both of which showed inhibition of amyloid β-protein aggregation and cytotoxicity. AuNPs modified by PEG were more effective compared to AuNPs alone in preventing neurodegenerative diseases [66]. There were also some AuNPs researches targeting insulin-like growth factor (IGF) receptor in the brain to deliver anti-neurodegenerative drug. It was worth noting that there were two IGF receptor, IGF-1 and IGF-2 receptors, on the brain capillaries [67]. It is possible to cause hypoglycemia when targeting IGF receptors.

AuNPs also have advantage in imaging. The insulin-targeted gold nanoparticles can serve as computed tomography (CT) contrast agents to highlight specific brain regions in which they accumulate [68]. Dual-functionalized gold nanoplasmonic particles can also monitor cerebral β-amyloid peptides in AD [69].

The size of AuNPs makes a difference in the biodistribution and circulation time. Different size (20, 50 and 70 nm) insulin coated gold nanoparticles (INS-GNPs) were synthesized to quantitatively test their ability of crossing BBB in Balb/C mice [70]. After 2 h injection, 20 nm INS-GNPs showed the most widespread biodistribution and highest accumulation within the brain, which indicated biodistribution and circulation time of INS-GNPs was size dependent. Compared with the larger INS-GNPs, the smaller one had advantages in blood circulation time. The size affected experimental result, which was also reproduced AuNPs modified by L-glutathione in different size (36.0 ± 3.0 nm, 18.1 ± 3.0 nm, and 6.0 ± 2.0 nm). Dynamic light scattering(DLS) experiments showed the AuNPs with smaller size could be more efficient in preventing Aβ peptides from aggregation to larger oligomers and thus avoided nucleation to form fibrils, which was not confined to a specific ligand, but would be a more general one [71]. This is crucially significant for developing novel AD therapy method because oligomers are the main reason of Aβ toxicity.

3.2. Iron nanoparticles

Iron accumulation in substantia nigra pars compacta has been proved to be a prominent pathophysiological feature of PD, which could induce the death of dopaminergic neurons, up-regulation of ROS, and further loss of motor control [72], [73]. Iron chelators had shown powerful iron chelating ability, antioxidation and neuroprotection in the treatment of PD even in clinical trials [74]. However, their therapeutic effect was hampered by short in vivo circulation time and cytotoxicity. Under this condition, iron chelation therapeutic nanoparticles protected by a zwitterionic poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) (PMPC) to delay the saturation of iron chelators in blood circulation and prolong the in vivo lifetime, with HIV-1 trans-activating transcriptor (TAT) served as a shuttle to enhance the BBB permeability was explored and investigated both in vitro and in vivo, which demonstrated iron chelator loaded therapeutic nanoparticles could reverse functional deficits in Parkinsonian mice not only physiologically but also behaviorally [75].

As one of iron nanoparticles, Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs), which are superparamagnetic, non-toxic and biocompatible, have been extensively investigated. With superparamagnetic property, their responsiveness to applied magnetic fields can be utilized for magnetically guided particle imaging. Osmotin was a 24 kDa multifunctional plant protein from tobacco, which can protect against neurodegeneration in postnatal rat brains [76]. Under functionalized magnetic field, dextran-coated Fe3O4 MNPs loaded with osmotin were transported to the brains of Aβ1–42 treated mice [77]. By electromagnetic function guiding MNPs into brain sites, the brain damage, such as Aβ accumulation, Beta-secretase 1 expression, synaptotoxicity, memory impairment and tau hyperphosphorylation in an Aβ1-42 injected mouse model, were significantly reversed for the first time. The magnetically mediated translocation of MNPs did not appear to induce deleterious signal transduction events and result in minimal accumulation in other organs and reach the brain within a few minutes of treatment without disrupting the BBB. This delivery also made full use of pH in the brains of AD patients which was lower than that in the brains of healthy individuals [78] to realize controlled release at the target site (AD brain) under acidic pH conditions. Similarly, oleic acid modified magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles, carrying N-isopropylacrylamide derivative, shRNA and nerve growth factor, also provided effective repair in a PD model [79]. In short, functional magnetic guidance may open a new path for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.

Furthermore, iron nanoparticles also have natural advantages in imaging. Diagnosis of AD can be performed with the assistance of amyloid imaging. Positron emission tomography(PET) is current diagnosis for AD, which is expensive and exposes people to radiation. While, magnetic resonance imaging is cheaper and is no-radioactive. A plenty of magnetic nanoparticles made of superparamagnetic iron oxide [80]conjugated with therapeutic substances (curcumin [81]) or modified ingredients(PEG [82],1,1-dicyano-2- [6-(dimethylamino)naphthalene-2-yl]propene carboxyl derivative [83]) to realize magnetic resonance imaging of AD.

3.3. Cerium oxide nanoparticles

Neurodegenerative diseases, such as AD, PD and ALS, are associated with high levels of oxidative stress, making them a target for treatment with cerium oxide nanoparticles(CeONPs) which have potent regenerative antioxidant properties. Therefore, CeONPs were currently being investigated for efficacy in several neurodegenerative disorders and have shown promising levels of neuroprotection [84]. While, traditional antioxidants have been attempted to alleviate the pathological changes in PD but with limited success because of poor ability to overcome the BBB [85].

Thus, different dose (0.1, 0.5 or 1 mg/kg) of CeO2NPs in 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) induced PD was investigated. Neurobiochemical derangements were almost reversed by the 0.5 mg/kg dose of CeO2NPs, while 0.1 mg/kg dose was not sufficient to alter biochemical measurements in the striatum [86]. CeO2NPs also ameliorated strength and prolonged life in SOD1G93A mouse model of ALS [87], which was striking compared no genuinely effective treatment for ALS.

However, biodistribution studies clearly demonstrated that the major organs of accumulation are liver, kidney and spleen, which may cause safety problem in future study. Thus the targeting measure could be applied to CeO2NPs to increase the efficacy and minimize the potential toxicity.

3.4. Molybdenum nanoparticles

AD is a complicated disease. The pathogenesis of AD also includes elevating the ROS level and disruption the Ca2+ homeostasis mediated by Aβ, both of which may lead to neuron injury and play an important role in AD [88]. The inhibition of Aβ aggregation and dissociation of Aβ fibrils only receive a mitigated inhibition effect and weak dissociation ability.

Recently, molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) NPs was investigated and exhibited multifunctional effects on Aβ peptides: inhibiting Aβ aggregation, destabilizing Aβ fibrils, alleviating Aβ-induced oxidative stress, as well as Aβ-mediated cell toxicity, and blocked the formation of the Ca2+ channel induced by Aβ fibrils in the cell membrane, which suggested that MoS2 NPs had great potential for a multifunctional therapeutic agent against amyloid related diseases [89].

3.5. Silica nanoparticles

Not all nanoparticles as vehicle have a therapeutic effect on the neurodegenerative disease. Silica nanoparticles (SiO2-NPs) were widely applied in diagnosis, imaging, and drug delivery of central nervous diseases [90]. However, recent researches showed that SiO2-NPs up-regulated α-synuclein expression-the hallmark of PD and induced autophagy through inhibiting negative regulation of autophagy PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling, which indicated that SiO2-NPs exposure induced neurotoxicity and may be a significant risk factor for the development of PD [91].

3.6. Organic nanoparticles

Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles, as one of the most widely studied vehicles to carry drugs to the specific site, have several advantages such as high drug loading capacity and function-modified structure and biocompatibility. Curcumin, as an active ingredient, was loaded in PLGA NPs which was modified by g7 ligand for BBB crossing, showing a significant decrease of Aβ aggregates without causing apparent toxicity [92]. Similarly, schisantherin A, a promising anti PD natural product, was encapsulated in methoxy poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(D,L)-lactic-co-glycolic acid (mPEG–PLGA) nanoparticles, demonstrating more effective brain delivery and stronger neuroprotective effects in zebrafish and cell culture models of PD [93]. Furthermore, PLGA nanoparticles functionalized with anti-transferrin receptor monoclonal antibody (OX26) and anti-Aβ(DE2B4) delivered iAβ5 into the brain, which protected anti-amyloid peptides from proteolytic degradation and increased their transport through BBB [94].

Poly(ethyleneglycol)-poly(lactic acid) (PEG-PLA), as another vehicles, modified with TGN peptides as the BBB ligand and QSH peptides for the Aβ42-binding (TQNP) to form a dual-functional nanoparticles and deliver Aβ-sheet breaker-H102 peptide, which obtained better ability in decreasing amyloid plaques, increasing Aβ-degrading enzymes, reducing tau protein phosphorylation, protecting synapses, and improving the spatial learning and memory of transgenic mice than nanoparticles modified with a single ligand [95].

Trehalose, as one of organic material, can invoke a suite of neuroprotective mechanisms that can contribute to improved cognitive performance in neurodegenerative disease [96], [97]. The designed poly(trehalose) nanoparticles, which are composed of a 6 nm iron oxide core and a zwitterionic polymer shell containing ∼5%–12% (w/w) covalently linked trehalose, are 1000–10,000 times more efficient than molecular trehalose in inhibiting protein fibrillation in extra-cellular space, in blocking aggregation of polyglutamine-containing mutant huntingtin protein in model neuronal cells, and in suppressing mutant huntingtin aggregates in HD mouse brain [98].

Although organic nanoparticles have a certain therapeutic effect, the efficiency is not high on the whole. Compared with inorganic nanocarriers, organic nanoparticles have a certain gap in vivo imaging.

4. Nanomicelles: high encapsulation efficiency and loading capacity

Compared with nanoparticles and liposomes, micelles have relatively fewer studies on the treatment of neurodegeneration disease. Polymeric micelles are another type of nanomaterial which can be obtained by the self-assembly of amphiphilic molecules in water above a critical concentration that is called critical micelle concentration. The structure of polymeric micelles often is consisted of an amphiphilic block copolymer and a core-shell. These nanomaterials are versatile and can incorporate solutes of different structures both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drug [99]. Nanomicells have natural advantage in controllable size and shape, and high encapsulation efficiency and loading capacity. However, inherent toxicity and low encapsulation efficiency of hydrophilic therapeutics limit its application. By targeting delivery, they can improve delivery efficiency and minimize side effects (Table 3).

Table 3.

Current knowledge of possible nanomicelles as vehicle in treating neurodegenerative disease.

Surface modify Model drug Application Mechanism of action NP size Model of use Result Refs.
PEGylated phospholipid nanomicelles No AD Sterically stabilized (PEGylated) phospholipid nanomicelles are effective in mitigating Aβ-42 aggregation 36.7 nm Human Neuroblastoma SHSY-5Y cell line PEGylated phospholipids abrogated transformation of Aβ-42 to amyloidogenic β-sheeted form and impart neuroprotection in vitro [146]
Curcumin micelles Curcumin AD Due to low absorption and quick elimination from the body, curcumin bioavailability was rather low which posed major problems for the use of curcumin as a therapeutic agent No mention NMRI mice Curcumin micelles improved bioavailability of native curcumin around 10- to 40-fold in plasma and brain of mice [100]
PEG–EGc Flurbiprofen AD Novel aptamer-functionalized polyethylene glycol-polylactic acid with the objective to target the transferrin receptor on brain endothelial cells. 110 nm bEND5 cells PEGD5 cellselles significantly enhanced intracellular flurbiprofen delivery when compared to unmodified micelles [101]
PHEA-EDA-Sq17-PS80 copolymer Rivastigmine free-base AD Deliver a model CNS-active drug to neuronal cells, by means of polymeric micelles obtained by self-assembling PS80-attached amphiphilic copolymers 34.1 nm Neuroblastoma cells An in vitro biological assay evidenced no cytotoxic effects of either empty or loaded micelles on the neuronal cell lines tested. Moreover, the micelles were internalized by neuroblastoma cell lines with drug uptake depending on the micelles concentration [102]
PEG-derivatized atocopherol (PTS) micells Coenzyme Q10 PD Nanomicellar formulation of CoQ10 (Ubisol-Q10) with improved properties, including the brain penetration,solubility, and bioavailability No mention Male C57BL/6 mice Study revealed that Ubisol-Q10 intervention could stop, but not reverse, the on-going neurodegeneration in MPTP-treated mouse brain [103]

Curcumin, as a model drug to treat AD, also was made into curcumin micelles by combining with Tween-80. According to results, curcumin micelles, which increased bioavailability in mouse plasma by around 45-fold, seemed to be the most effective formulation for increasing curcumin bioavailability comparing with curcumin nanoparticles (9-fold) and curcumin liposomes(5-fold) [100]. Other therapeutic substances, such as flurbiprofen for AD [101], rivastigmine for AD [102] and Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) for PD [103], were also loaded on different nanomicelles, all of which increased the amount of brain penetration, solubility, and bioavailability.

5. Exosomes: new emerging and promising nanocarriers

Exosomes, as one of natural endogenous nanocarriers, vary from 30 nm to 150 nm in size and have a typical lipid bilayer structure, which are reputed as “drifting bottle” in living body. It is secreted by a variety of cells: B cells [104], and T cells [105], macrophages [106], dendritic cells [107]. After found in 1986 by Johnstone et al. [108], it gradually becomes a research hotspot.

Exosomes distinguish themselves from other vehicles mainly in two features. The one is immune privilege: as natural carrier systems with endogenous cellular tropism, exosomes can avoid the endosomal pathway and lysosomal degradation, diminish clearance by the mononuclear phagocyte system, and increase drug transport to target tissues, just function as “invisibility cloak”. The long-distance intercellular communication facilitates the carry of unstable therapeutic molecules, such as nucleic acids, and proteins [109], [110], [111]. Especially, exosomes have been shown to preserve mRNAs and siRNAs within their “aqueous” proteinaceous core even under external RNase treatment, and subsequently to deliver functional RNAs to recipient cells [112]. Noteworthily, compared with PEGylated liposomes, which could lost their long-circulating property when they were administered twice in the same animal within certain intervals [113], exosome showed great superiority as nono-carrier.

The other advantage is the wide diversity of endogenous marker molecules, adhesive proteins and specific vector ligands (tetraspanins, integrins, CD11b and CD18 receptors) presenting on exosomes surface [114], [115], [116], [117], making it more easier to be modified and deliver therapeutic molecules to targeted cell. By modifying the surface, exosomes can get over poor targeting problem. For example Alvarez-Erviti research [16] used targeted exosomes to cross BBB. Targeting was achieved by engineering the dendritic cells to express Lamp2b, an exosomal membrane protein, fused to the neuron-specific RVGpeptide3. Intravenously injected RVG-targeted exosomes delivered GAPDH siRNA specifically to neurons, microglia, oligodendrocytes in the brain, resulting a strong mRNA (60%) and protein (62%) knockdown of Beta-secretase 1, a therapeutic target in AD, in wild-type mice [118] (Fig. 3). Furthermore, therapeutic catalase mRNA delivery by Lamp2b modified exosomes attenuated neurotoxicity and neuroinflammation in vitro and in vivo models of PD, indicating the potential usefulness of the EXOsomal transfer devices for RNA delivery-based therapeutic applications [119]. The use of exosomes as siRNA vectors is still in early stage, but exosomes may be a significant advance in the field of macromolecular drug delivery and may be a key step in the clinical application of siRNA.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Schematic representation of production, harvest and re-administration of targeted self-exosomes for gene deliver.

Accumulating evidence suggests that exosomes can be effectively used as vehicle for the treatment of various neurodegenerative disorders (Table 3). However, related research showed that exosomes proteins were found to accumulate in the plaques of AD patient brains, in which β-cleavage of amyloid precursor protein occurs in early endosomes and a fraction of Aβ peptides was localized to multivesicular bodies and was released in association with exosomes [120]. Therefore, exosomes provided a mechanism of Aβ and amyloid precursor protein(APP)- C-terminal fragments (CTFs) trafficking around the body, possibly contributing to amyloid deposition in the brain [121]. Whereas, glycosphingolipid-enriched exosome infusion leaded to a decrease in Aβ levels and ameliorates Aβ-related pathologies in APP mice [122]. Thus, exosomes from different sources or different compositions have completely different effects on neurodegenerative diseases.

The same thing happens in PD. Exosomes have been shown to spread toxic α-synuclein (αsyn) between cells and induce apoptosis, which suggests a key mechanism underlying the spread of αsyn aggregates in the brain and the acceleration of pathology in PD [123], [124]. Exosome-associated αsyn oligomers were more likely to be taken up by recipient cells and could induce more toxicity compared to free αsyn oligomers [125]. However, exosomes also had a profound catalytic effect on αsyn aggregation kinetics, which ascribed to the ganglioside lipid components [126]. In treatment filed, as drug delivery vehicles, exosomes have been used to carry small interfering RNAs and catalase to the brain, showing clear therapeutic effects in a PD mouse model [127], [128].

In conclusion, the cause and effect relationship between exosomes and pathogenesis of AD and PD is not clear enough. Related research is still at early stage. There are several problems waiting to be handled before they enter into clinical practice.

  • (1)

    Exosomes are so complex in molecular constituents that safety issues and potential risk must be highlighted and evaluated comprehensively.

  • (2)

    It is well known that exosomes alter considerably among different cellular sources, such as multipotent stem cells and tumor cells [129]. So one of the major obstacles laying in this approach is whether exosomes can be produced in large scale or reproducibly.

  • (3)

    As brain target vehicle, it can't be overemphasized to improve the target ability of exosomes to enhance the drug concentration in brain area and avoid adverse effect.

6. Potential risk of nanocarriers

Although, nanocarriers can be a strong and powerful tool to penetrate the BBB, there are plenty of problems that need to be solved. First, after massive nanocarriers absorbed into the brain, the specific distribution in the brain is not clear in many research, which may cause potential risk in such a sophisticated organ.

Second, the metabolism of nanocarriers is the key point. On the one hand, a large of nanocarriers are inorganic material, such as gold nanoparticles, iron nanoparticles, cerium oxide nanoparticles, molybdenum nanoparticles and silica nanoparticles which are hard to metabolize, probably resulting accumulate in brain. They can contribute to neurodegeneration by inducing mitochondrial dysfunction, redox imbalance and apoptosis, autophagy and impaired lysosomal activity, cytoskeletal damage and vesicle trafficking perturbations, neuroinflammation and microglia activation [41], [130], [131], [132], [133]. The magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles can result neuronal loss in the chicken embryo [134] and cerium oxide nanoparticles can inhibit differentiation of neural stem cells [135]. On the other hand, biodegradable nanoparticles also show neurotoxicity in our previous research. For example, after polysorbate 80-modified chitosan nanoparticles injecting into body, the body weight was found to remarkably decreased in a dose-dependent manner for seven days, also causing apoptosis, necrosis of neurons, and slight inflammatory response in the frontal cortex [136]. Moreover, chitosan nanoparticles at a size of 200 nm caused malformations, including a bent spine, pericardial edema, and an opaque yolk in zebrafish embryos [137], [138].

Third, nanocarriers also bring changes in the mode of administration, from oral into injection, which may bring some problems in practical use. Most of the nano-formulation are injections, while the general pharmaceutical preparations are oral dosage forms. In actual use, especially for patients with neurodegenerative diseases, oral preparations are easier to accept than the injections.

Consequently, additional investigations in this area should be performed, including further studies on the acute toxicity, potential long-term neurotoxicity and actual use problem (Table 4).

Table 4.

Current knowledge of possible exosomes as vehicle in treating neurodegenerative diseases.

Model drug Source of exosomes Application Mechanism of action Loading method NP size Model of use Result Refs.
GAPDH siRNA Self-derived dendritic cells Neurodegenerative disorder RVG-targeted exosomes to neurons, microglia, oligodendrocytes in the brain, resulting in a specific gene knockdown Electroporation 80 nm C57BL/6 mice RVG exosomes are especially capable of delivering siRNA specifically and safely after systemic administration and therefore represented a promising vehicle for gene therapies targeting chronic neurodegenerative disorders [118]
Catalase Neuronal cells PD Catalase preservation against proteases degradation The incubation sonication, or extrusion 100–200 nm C57BL/6 mice Selected exoCAT formulations significantly decreased brain inflammation and increased neuronal survival in a PD mouse model [127]
miR-124 HEK 293 cells HD The delivery of abnormally downregulated miRNAs might restore normal gene regulation and has a therapeutic effect Co-incubation Not mention R6/2 line of transgenic HD mice When Exo-124 was delivered to the striatum, it reduced the expression of REST. However, Exo-124 had little effect on Rota-Rod performance [147]
Hydrophobically modified siRNAs Glioblastoma U87 cells HD To improve stability and promote cellular internalization Co-incubation 140 nm Wild-type FVBNj mice Unilateral infusion of hsiRNA-loaded exosomes, but not hsiRNAs alone, into mouse striatum resulted in bilateral oligonucleotide distribution and statistically significant bilateral silencing of up to 35% of Huntingtin mRNA [148]
siRNA Murine dendritic cells PD To achieve widespread delivery of siRNAs to the brain, peripherally injected modified exosomes that specifically target the brain by expressing a brain-targeting peptide (rabies virus glycoprotein peptide; RVG) loaded with siRNA Electroporation 100 nm Transgenic mice Using systemic administration of siRNAs, it was able to significantly decrease the level of endogenous mouse α-Syn, and a proaggregating human form of α-Syn in a transgenic mouse model, in brain regions pathologically affected in PD [128]
mRNA HEK-293T cells PD Exosomes bearing catalase mRNA produced by exosome producer cells equipped with the EXOsomal transfer into cells devices could rescue neuronal cell death induced by 6-hydroxydopamine EXOsomal transfer into cells devices 100 nm C57BL/6 J mice Designer exosomes produced by the engineered exosome producer cells significantly reduced the neurotoxicity of 6-hydroxydopamine towards CHRNA7-positive Neuro2A cells without the need for exosome concentration [119]

7. Future perspectives and conclusions

Overall, nanocarriers can provide promising opportunities for improving neurodegenerative diseases. Nanocarriers such as liposomes, nanoparticles, nanomicelles and exosomes, were modified in the surface to enhance brain targeting ability. With the help of some specific ligands (glucose, lactoferrin, transferrin, specific peptides), nanocarriers efficiently crosses the BBB and able to deliver the drug which normally cannot cross the BBB at the particular site.

However, this field is still in at the infant stage. Several issues should be resolved before neurodegenerative diseases nanomedicine comes to clinical setting. Among them, the low targeting efficiency is general and the biggest obstacle, which may hamper the therapeutic effect and cause damage to other organs. Furthermore, the distribution of nanomaterials into the brain is another concern. In order to achieve precise targeting in the brain, sequentially targeted nanomaterials deserve attention. Not only target BBB, also target the lesion site, to avoid distribution in whole brain. Besides, in the long term, the toxicity of nanomaterials, especially for inorganic nanomaterials, should not be overlooked. The degradation properties of nanomaterials should be of great concern.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81620108028).

Footnotes

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.ajps.2018.09.005.

Appendix. Supplementary materials

mmc1.xml (272B, xml)

References

  • 1.Baker SK, Chen ZL, Norris EH, Revenko AS, MacLeod AR, Strickland S. Blood-derived plasminogen drives brain inflammation and plaque deposition in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115(41):9687–9696. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1811172115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Braak H, Del Tredici K, Rub U, de Vos RA, Jansen Steur EN, Braak E. Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2003;24(2):197–211. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(02)00065-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pringsheim T, Jette N, Frolkis A, Steeves TD. The prevalence of Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mov Disord. 2014;29(13):1583–1590. doi: 10.1002/mds.25945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stampfli P, Sommer S, Czell D. Investigation of neurodegenerative processes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using white matter fiber density. Clin Neuroradiol. 2018;2:1–11. doi: 10.1007/s00062-018-0670-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kay C, Collins JA, Wright GEB. The molecular epidemiology of Huntington disease is related to intermediate allele frequency and haplotype in the general population. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2018;3:346–357. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tonda-Turo C, Origlia N, Mattu C, Accorroni A, Chiono V. Current limitations in the treatment Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases: state-of-the-art and future perspective of polymeric carriers. Curr Med Chem. 2018;25 doi: 10.2174/0929867325666180221125759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Meredith ME, Salameh TS, Banks WA. Intranasal delivery of proteins and peptides in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. AAPS J. 2015;17(4):780–787. doi: 10.1208/s12248-015-9719-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ayyalasomayajula N, Suresh C. Mechanistic comparison of current pharmacological treatments and novel phytochemicals to target amyloid peptides in Alzheimer's and neurodegenerative diseases. Nutr Neurosci. 2017;6:1–13. doi: 10.1080/1028415X.2017.1345425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Trapani G, Satriano C, La Mendola D. Peptides and their metal complexes in neurodegenerative diseases: from structural studies to nanomedicine prospects. Curr Med Chem. 2018;25(6):715–747. doi: 10.2174/0929867324666171026163144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jang TH, Lim IH, Kim CM. Rescuing neuronal cell death by RAIDD- and PIDD- derived peptides and its implications for therapeutic intervention in neurodegenerative diseases. Sci Rep. 2016;9(6):31198. doi: 10.1038/srep31198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Prakash S, Malhotra M, Rengaswamy V. Nonviral siRNA delivery for gene silencing in neurodegenerative diseases. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;623:211–229. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-588-0_14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Malhotra M, Tomaro-Duchesneau C, Prakash S. Synthesis of TAT peptide-tagged PEGylated chitosan nanoparticles for siRNA delivery targeting neurodegenerative diseases. Biomaterials. 2013;34(4):1270–1280. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Koutsilieri E, Rethwilm A, Scheller C. The therapeutic potential of siRNA in gene therapy of neurodegenerative disorders. J Neural Transm Suppl. 2007;72:43–49. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-73574-9_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Johnsen KB, Burkhart A, Melander F. Targeting transferrin receptors at the blood-brain barrier improves the uptake of immunoliposomes and subsequent cargo transport into the brain parenchyma. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):10396–10409. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11220-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rehman M, Madni A, Shi D. Enhanced blood brain barrier permeability and glioblastoma cell targeting via thermoresponsive lipid nanoparticles. Nanoscale. 2017;9(40):15434–15440. doi: 10.1039/c7nr05216b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pardridge WM. Blood-brain barrier endogenous transporters as therapeutic targets: a new model for small molecule CNS drug discovery. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2015;19(8):1059–1072. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2015.1042364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Abbott NJ, Patabendige AA, Dolman DE, Yusof SR, Begley DJ. Structure and function of the blood-brain barrier. Neurobiol Dis. 2010;37(1):13–25. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.07.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pardridge WM. Drug transport across the blood-brain barrier. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32(11):1959–1972. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Begley DJ. Delivery of therapeutic agents to the central nervous system: the problems and the possibilities. Pharmacol Ther. 2004;104(1):29–45. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2004.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Matsumoto J, Stewart T, Banks WA, Zhang J. The transport mechanism of extracellular vesicles at the blood-brain barrier. Curr Pharm Des. 2017;23(10):6206–6214. doi: 10.2174/1381612823666170913164738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Patel AA, Patel RJ, Patel SR. Nanomedicine for intranasal delivery to improve brain uptake. Curr Drug Deliv. 2017;15(4):461–469. doi: 10.2174/1567201814666171013150534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bhaskar S, Tian F, Stoeger T. Multifunctional nanocarriers for diagnostics, drug delivery and targeted treatment across blood-brain barrier: perspectives on tracking and neuroimaging. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2010;73 doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-7-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ren Y, Zhan C, Gao J. A D-peptide ligand of integrins for simultaneously targeting angiogenic blood vasculature and glioma cells. Mol Pharm. 2018;15(2):592–601. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang L, Liu Y, Song J. MicroRNA-103 suppresses glioma cell proliferation and invasion by targeting the brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Mol Med Rep. 2018;17(3):4083–4089. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.8282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Miranda A, Blanco-Prieto MJ, Sousa J, Pais A, Vitorino C. Breaching barriers in glioblastoma. Part II: targeted drug delivery and lipid nanoparticles. Int J Pharm. 2017;531(1):389–410. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.07.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kumari S, Ahsan SM, Kumar JM, Kondapi AK, Rao NM. Overcoming blood brain barrier with a dual purpose temozolomide loaded lactoferrin nanoparticles for combating glioma (SERP-17-12433) Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):6602. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06888-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Glaser T, Han I, Wu L, Zeng X. Targeted nanotechnology in glioblastoma multiforme. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:166–180. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kumar DK, Choi SH, Washicosky KJ. Amyloid-beta peptide protects against microbial infection in mouse and worm models of Alzheimer's disease. Sci Trans Med. 2016;8(340):340–372. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf1059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Daneman R. The blood-brain barrier in health and disease. Ann Neurol. 2012;72(5):648–672. doi: 10.1002/ana.23648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Majerova P, Garruto RM, Kovac A. Cerebrovascular inflammation is associated with tau pathology in Guam parkinsonism dementia. J Neural Trans Vienna. 2018;125(7):1013–1025. doi: 10.1007/s00702-018-1883-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ahn KC, Learman CR, Dunbar GL. Characterization of impaired cerebrovascular structure in APP/PS1 mouse brains. Neuroscience. 2018;385:246–254. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cristante E, McArthur S, Mauro C. Identification of an essential endogenous regulator of blood-brain barrier integrity, and its pathological and therapeutic implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(3):832–841. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1209362110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Noble GT, Stefanick JF, Ashley JD, Kiziltepe T, Bilgicer B. Ligand-targeted liposome design: challenges and fundamental considerations. Trends Biotechnol. 2014;32(1):32–45. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vieira DB, Gamarra LF. Getting into the brain: liposome-based strategies for effective drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier. Int J Nanomed. 2018;11:5381–5414. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S117210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dimov N, Kastner E, Hussain M, Perrie Y, Szita N. Formation and purification of tailored liposomes for drug delivery using a module-based micro continuous-flow system. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):12045. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11533-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sun J, Jiang L, Lin Y. Enhanced anticancer efficacy of paclitaxel through multistage tumor-targeting liposomes modified with RGD and KLA peptides. Int J Nanomed. 2017;(12):1517–1537. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S122859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vacek J, Zatloukalova M, Geleticova J. Electrochemical platform for the detection of transmembrane proteins reconstituted into liposomes. Anal Chem. 2016;88(8):4548–4556. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Perri V, Pellegrino M, Ceccacci F. Use of short interfering RNA delivered by cationic liposomes to enable efficient down-regulation of PTPN22 gene in human T lymphocytes. PLoS One. 2017;12(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Schnyder A, Huwyler J. Drug transport to brain with targeted liposomes. NeuroRx. 2005;2(1):99–107. doi: 10.1602/neurorx.2.1.99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Costantino L, Tosi G, Ruozi B, Bondioli L, Vandelli MA, Forni F. Chapter 3-Colloidal systems for CNS drug delivery. Prog Brain Res. 2009;180:35–69. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)80003-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wong HL, Wu XY, Bendayan R. Nanotechnological advances for the delivery of CNS therapeutics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64(7):686–700. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2011.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Xie F, Yao N, Qin Y. Investigation of glucose-modified liposomes using polyethylene glycols with different chain lengths as the linkers for brain targeting. Int J Nanomed. 2012;7:163–175. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S23771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kuo YC, Tsao CW. Neuroprotection against apoptosis of SK-N-MC cells using RMP-7- and lactoferrin-grafted liposomes carrying quercetin. Int J Nanomed. 2017;12:2857–2869. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S132472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Song XL, Liu S, Jiang Y. Targeting vincristine plus tetrandrine liposomes modified with DSPE-PEG2000-transferrin in treatment of brain glioma. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2017;96:129–140. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2016.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Reijerkerk A, Appeldoorn CC, Rip J, de Boer M, Gaillard PJ. Systemic treatment with glutathione PEGylated liposomal methylprednisolone (2B3-201) improves therapeutic efficacy in a model of ocular inflammation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(4):2788–2794. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sharma G, Lakkadwala S, Modgil A, Singh J. The role of cell-penetrating peptide and transferrin on enhanced delivery of drug to brain. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(6):806. doi: 10.3390/ijms17060806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chen ZL, Huang M, Wang XR. Transferrin-modified liposome promotes alpha-mangostin to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. Nanomedicine. 2016;12(2):421–430. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2015.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Moos T, Morgan EH. Transferrin and transferrin receptor function in brain barrier systems. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2000;20(1):77–95. doi: 10.1023/A:1006948027674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lee HJ, Engelhardt B, Lesley J, Bickel U, Pardridge WM. Targeting rat anti-mouse transferrin receptor monoclonal antibodies through blood-brain barrier in mouse. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2000;292(3):1048–1052. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Maier KE, Jangra RK, Shieh KR. A new transferrin receptor aptamer inhibits new world hemorrhagic fever mammarenavirus entry. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2016;321 doi: 10.1038/mtna.2016.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kannan R, Chakrabarti R, Tang D, Kim KJ, Kaplowitz N. GSH transport in human cerebrovascular endothelial cells and human astrocytes: evidence for luminal localization of Na+-dependent GSH transport in HCEC. Brain Res. 2000;852(2):374–382. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)02184-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rotman M, Welling MM, Bunschoten A. Enhanced glutathione PEGylated liposomal brain delivery of an anti-amyloid single domain antibody fragment in a mouse model for Alzheimer's disease. J Control Rel. 2015;203:40–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rip J, Chen L, Hartman R. Glutathione PEGylated liposomes: pharmacokinetics and delivery of cargo across the blood-brain barrier in rats. J Drug Target. 2014;22(5):460–467. doi: 10.3109/1061186X.2014.888070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Joshi S, Singh-Moon RP, Ellis JA. Cerebral hypoperfusion-assisted intra-arterial deposition of liposomes in normal and glioma-bearing rats. Neurosurgery. 2015;76(1):92–100. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Joshi S, Singh-Moon R, Wang M. Cationic surface charge enhances early regional deposition of liposomes after intracarotid injection. J Neurooncol. 2014;120(3):489–497. doi: 10.1007/s11060-014-1584-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Fenart L, Casanova A, Dehouck B. Evaluation of effect of charge and lipid coating on ability of 60-nm nanoparticles to cross an in vitro model of the blood-brain barrier. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;291(3):1017–1022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Cavaletti G, Cassetti A, Canta A. Cationic liposomes target sites of acute neuroinflammation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Mol Pharm. 2009;6(5):1363–1370. doi: 10.1021/mp8001478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Sydow K, Nikolenko H, Lorenz D, Muller RH, Dathe M. Lipopeptide-based micellar and liposomal carriers: Influence of surface charge and particle size on cellular uptake into blood brain barrier cells. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2016;109:130–139. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Gobbi M, Re F, Canovi M. Lipid-based nanoparticles with high binding affinity for amyloid-beta1-42 peptide. Biomaterials. 2010;31(25):6519–6529. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ewert KK, Kotamraju VR, Majzoub RN. Synthesis of linear and cyclic peptide-PEG-lipids for stabilization and targeting of cationic liposome-DNA complexes. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2016;26(6):1618–1623. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.01.079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Balducci C, Mancini S, Minniti S. Multifunctional liposomes reduce brain beta-amyloid burden and ameliorate memory impairment in Alzheimer's disease mouse models. J Neurosci. 2014;34(42):14022–14031. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0284-14.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gao JQ, Lv Q, Li LM. Glioma targeting and blood-brain barrier penetration by dual-targeting doxorubincin liposomes. Biomaterials. 2013;34(22):5628–5639. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Muller AP, Ferreira GK, Pires AJ. Gold nanoparticles prevent cognitive deficits, oxidative stress and inflammation in a rat model of sporadic dementia of Alzheimer's type. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;77:476–483. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Xiong N, Zhao Y, Dong X, Zheng J, Sun Y. Design of a molecular hybrid of dual peptide inhibitors coupled on AuNPs for enhanced inhibition of Amyloid beta-protein aggregation and cytotoxicity. Small. 2017;13(13) doi: 10.1002/smll.201601666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kim MJ, Rehman SU, Amin FU, Kim MO. Enhanced neuroprotection of anthocyanin-loaded PEG-gold nanoparticles against Abeta1-42-induced neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration via the NF-KB /JNK/GSK3beta signaling pathway. Nanomedicine. 2017;13(8):2533–2544. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2017.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kim MJ, Rehman SU, Amin FU, Kim MO. Enhanced neuroprotection of anthocyanin-loaded PEG-gold nanoparticles against Abeta1-42-induced neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration via the NF-KB /JNK/GSK3beta signaling pathway. Nanomedicine. 2017;13(8):2533–2544. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2017.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Pitt J, Wilcox KC, Tortelli V. Neuroprotective astrocyte-derived insulin/insulin-like growth factor 1 stimulates endocytic processing and extracellular release of neuron-bound Abeta oligomers. Mol Biol Cell. 2017;28(20):2623–2636. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E17-06-0416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Shilo M, Motiei M, Hana P, Popovtzer R. Transport of nanoparticles through the blood-brain barrier for imaging and therapeutic applications. Nanoscale. 2014;6(4):2146–2152. doi: 10.1039/c3nr04878k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Yu YY, Zhang L, Sun XY. A sensitive colorimetric strategy for monitoring cerebral beta-amyloid peptides in AD based on dual-functionalized gold nanoplasmonic particles. Chem Commun Camb. 2015;51(42):8880–8883. doi: 10.1039/c5cc01855b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Betzer O, Shilo M, Opochinsky R. The effect of nanoparticle size on the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier: an in vivo study. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2017;12(13):1533–1546. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2017-0022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gao G, Zhang M, Gong D, Chen R, Hu X, Sun T. The size-effect of gold nanoparticles and nanoclusters in the inhibition of amyloid-beta fibrillation. Nanoscale. 2017;9(12):4107–4113. doi: 10.1039/c7nr00699c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Das B, Vedachalam S, Luo D, Antonio T, Reith ME, Dutta AK. Development of a highly potent D2/D3 agonist and a partial agonist from structure-activity relationship study of N(6)-(2-(4-(1H-Indol-5-yl)piperazin-1-yl)ethyl)-N(6)-propyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydroben zo [d]thiazole-2,6-diamine Analogues: implication in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. J Med Chem. 2015;58(23):9179–9195. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Chan CS, Gertler TS, Surmeier DJ. A molecular basis for the increased vulnerability of substantia nigra dopamine neurons in aging and Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2010;25:1S63–1S70. doi: 10.1002/mds.22801. Suppl. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Xu Q, Kanthasamy AG, Reddy MB. Neuroprotective effect of the natural iron chelator, phytic acid in a cell culture model of Parkinson's disease. Toxicology. 2008;245(1-2):101–108. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2007.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Wang N, Jin X, Guo D, Tong G, Zhu X. Iron chelation nanoparticles with delayed saturation as an effective therapy for Parkinson disease. Biomacromolecules. 2017;18(2):461–474. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.6b01547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Shah SA, Yoon GH, Chung SS. Novel osmotin inhibits SREBP2 via the AdipoR1/AMPK/SIRT1 pathway to improve Alzheimer's disease neuropathological deficits. Mol Psychiatry. 2017;22(3):407–416. doi: 10.1038/mp.2016.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Amin FU, Hoshiar AK, Do TD. Osmotin-loaded magnetic nanoparticles with electromagnetic guidance for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Nanoscale. 2017;9(30):10619–10632. doi: 10.1039/c7nr00772h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kopecek J. Polymer-drug conjugates: origins, progress to date and future directions. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65(1):49–59. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.10.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Niu S, Zhang LK, Zhang L. Inhibition by multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles loaded with Alpha-synuclein RNAi plasmid in a Parkinson's disease model. Theranostics. 2017;7(2):344–356. doi: 10.7150/thno.16562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Sillerud LO, Solberg NO, Chamberlain R. SPION-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of Alzheimer's disease plaques in AbetaPP/PS-1 transgenic mouse brain. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;34(2):349–365. doi: 10.3233/JAD-121171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Cheng KK, Chan PS, Fan S. Curcumin-conjugated magnetic nanoparticles for detecting amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's disease mice using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Biomaterials. 2015;44:155–172. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Wadghiri YZ, Li J, Wang J. Detection of amyloid plaques targeted by bifunctional USPIO in Alzheimer's disease transgenic mice using magnetic resonance microimaging. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):57097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Zhou J, Fa H, Yin W. Synthesis of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles coated with a DDNP-carboxyl derivative for in vitro magnetic resonance imaging of Alzheimer's disease. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2014;37:348–355. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Rzigalinski BA, Carfagna CS, Ehrich M. Cerium oxide nanoparticles in neuroprotection and considerations for efficacy and safety. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2017;9(4) doi: 10.1002/wnan.1444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Saraiva C, Praca C, Ferreira R, Santos T, Ferreira L, Bernardino L. Nanoparticle-mediated brain drug delivery: overcoming blood-brain barrier to treat neurodegenerative diseases. J Control Rel. 2016;235:34–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.05.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Hegazy MA, Maklad HM, Samy DM, Abdelmonsif DA, El Sabaa BM, Elnozahy FY. Cerium oxide nanoparticles could ameliorate behavioral and neurochemical impairments in 6-hydroxydopamine induced Parkinson's disease in rats. Neurochem Int. 2017;108:361–371. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2017.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.DeCoteau W, Heckman KL, Estevez AY. Cerium oxide nanoparticles with antioxidant properties ameliorate strength and prolong life in mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nanomedicine. 2016;12(8):2311–2320. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2016.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Li M, Zhao C, Duan T, Ren J, Qu X. New insights into Alzheimer's disease amyloid inhibition: nanosized metallo-supramolecular complexes suppress abeta-induced biosynthesis of heme and iron uptake in PC12 cells. Adv Healthc Mater. 2014;3(6):832–836. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201300470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Han Q, Cai S, Yang L. Molybdenum disulfide nanoparticles as multifunctional inhibitors against Alzheimer's disease. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(25):21116–21123. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b03816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Liu X, Sui B, Sun J. Blood-brain barrier dysfunction induced by silica NPs in vitro and in vivo: Involvement of oxidative stress and Rho-kinase/JNK signaling pathways. Biomaterials. 2017;121:64–82. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Xie H, Wu J. Silica nanoparticles induce alpha-synuclein induction and aggregation in PC12-cells. Chem Biol Interact. 2016;258:197–204. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2016.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Barbara R, Belletti D, Pederzoli F. Novel curcumin loaded nanoparticles engineered for blood-brain barrier crossing and able to disrupt abeta aggregates. Int J Pharm. 2017;526(1-2):413–424. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Chen T, Li C, Li Y. Small-sized mPEG-PLGA nanoparticles of schisantherin A with sustained release for enhanced brain uptake and anti-Parkinsonian activity. ACS Appl Mater Interf. 2017;9(11):9516–9527. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b01171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Loureiro JA, Gomes B, Fricker G, Coelho MAN, Rocha S, Pereira MC. Cellular uptake of PLGA nanoparticles targeted with anti-amyloid and anti-transferrin receptor antibodies for Alzheimer's disease treatment. Colloids Surf B Biointerf. 2016;145:8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.04.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Zheng X, Zhang C, Guo Q. Dual-functional nanoparticles for precise drug delivery to Alzheimer's disease lesions: targeting mechanisms, pharmacodynamics and safety. Int J Pharm. 2017;525(1):237–248. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.04.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Tanji K, Miki Y, Maruyama A. Trehalose intake induces chaperone molecules along with autophagy in a mouse model of Lewy body disease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;465(4):746–752. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.08.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Portbury SD, Hare DJ, Sgambelloni C. Trehalose improves cognition in the transgenic Tg2576 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;60(2):549–560. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Debnath K, Pradhan N, Singh BK, Jana NR, Jana NR. Poly(trehalose) nanoparticles prevent amyloid aggregation and suppress polyglutamine aggregation in a Huntington's disease model mouse. ACS Appl Mater Interf. 2017;9(28):24126–24139. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b06510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Gilmore JL, Yi X, Quan L, Kabanov AV. Novel nanomaterials for clinical neuroscience. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2008;3(2):83–94. doi: 10.1007/s11481-007-9099-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Hagl S, Kocher A, Schiborr C, Kolesova N, Frank J, Eckert GP. Curcumin micelles improve mitochondrial function in neuronal PC12 cells and brains of NMRI mice: impact on bioavailability. Neurochem Int. 2015:89234–89242. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2015.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Mu C, Dave N, Hu J. Solubilization of flurbiprofen into aptamer-modified PEG-PLA micelles for targeted delivery to brain-derived endothelial cells in vitro. J Microencapsul. 2013;30(7):701–708. doi: 10.3109/02652048.2013.778907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Scialabba C, Rocco F, Licciardi M, Pitarresi G, Ceruti M, Giammona G. Amphiphilic polyaspartamide copolymer-based micelles for rivastigmine delivery to neuronal cells. Drug Deliv. 2012;19(6):307–316. doi: 10.3109/10717544.2012.714813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Sikorska M, Lanthier P, Miller H. Nanomicellar formulation of coenzyme Q10 (Ubisol-Q10) effectively blocks ongoing neurodegeneration in the mouse 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine model: potential use as an adjuvant treatment in Parkinson's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;35(10):2329–2346. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.03.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Clayton A, Turkes A, Navabi H, Mason MD, Tabi Z. Induction of heat shock proteins in B-cell exosomes. J Cell Sci. 2005;118(Pt 16):3631–3638. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Nolte-'t Hoen EN, Buschow SI, Anderton SM, Stoorvogel W, Wauben MH. Activated T cells recruit exosomes secreted by dendritic cells via LFA-1. Blood. 2009;113(9):1977–1981. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-08-174094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Ying W, Riopel M, Bandyopadhyay G. Adipose tissue macrophage-derived exosomal miRNAs can modulate in vivo and in vitro insulin sensitivity. Cell. 2017;171(2):372–384. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Silva AM, Almeida MI, Teixeira JH. Dendritic cell-derived extracellular vesicles mediate mesenchymal stem/stromal cell recruitment. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1667. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01809-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Johnstone RM, Adam M, Hammond JR, Orr L, Turbide C. Vesicle formation during reticulocyte maturation:association of plasma membrane activities with released vesicles (exosomes) J Biol Chem. 1987;262(19):9412–9420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Shtam TA, Kovalev RA, Varfolomeeva EY, Makarov EM, Kil YV, Filatov MV. Exosomes are natural carriers of exogenous siRNA to human cells in vitro. Cell Commun Signal. 2013;11:88. doi: 10.1186/1478-811X-11-88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Pegtel DM, Cosmopoulos K, Thorley-Lawson DA. Functional delivery of viral miRNAs via exosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(14):6328–6333. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914843107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Koppers-Lalic D, Hogenboom MM, Middeldorp JM, Pegtel DM. Virus-modified exosomes for targeted RNA delivery; a new approach in nanomedicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65(3):348–356. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Mathivanan S, Fahner CJ, Reid GE, Simpson RJ. ExoCarta 2012: database of exosomal proteins, RNA and lipids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Database issue):D1241–D1244. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Ishida T, Kashima S, Kiwada H. The contribution of phagocytic activity of liver macrophages to the accelerated blood clearance (ABC) phenomenon of PEGylated liposomes in rats. J Control Rel. 2008;126(2):162–165. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Khushman M, Bhardwaj A, Patel GK. Exosomal markers (CD63 and CD9) expression pattern using immunohistochemistry in resected malignant and nonmalignant pancreatic specimens. Pancreas. 2017;46(6):782–788. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Kawakami K, Fujita Y, Kato T. Integrin beta4 and vinculin contained in exosomes are potential markers for progression of prostate cancer associated with taxane-resistance. Int J Oncol. 2015;47(1):384–390. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2015.3011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Yu S, Liu C, Su K. Tumor exosomes inhibit differentiation of bone marrow dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2007;178(11):6867–6875. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.11.6867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Jiang J, Kao CY, Papoutsakis ET. How do megakaryocytic microparticles target and deliver cargo to alter the fate of hematopoietic stem cells? J Control Rel. 2017;247:1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.12.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Alvarez-Erviti L, Seow Y, Yin H, Betts C, Lakhal S, Wood MJ. Delivery of siRNA to the mouse brain by systemic injection of targeted exosomes. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(4):341–345. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Kojima R, Bojar D, Rizzi G. Designer exosomes produced by implanted cells intracerebrally deliver therapeutic cargo for Parkinson's disease treatment. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1305. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03733-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Rajendran L, Honsho M, Zahn TR. Alzheimer's disease beta-amyloid peptides are released in association with exosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(30):11172–11177. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603838103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Sharples RA, Vella LJ, Nisbet RM. Inhibition of gamma-secretase causes increased secretion of amyloid precursor protein C-terminal fragments in association with exosomes. Faseb J. 2008;22(5):1469–1478. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-9357com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Yuyama K, Sun H, Sakai S. Decreased amyloid-beta pathologies by intracerebral loading of glycosphingolipid-enriched exosomes in Alzheimer model mice. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(35):24488–24498. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.577213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Wu X, Zheng T, Zhang B. Exosomes in Parkinson's disease. Neurosci Bull. 2017;33(3):331–338. doi: 10.1007/s12264-016-0092-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Stuendl A, Kunadt M, Kruse N. Induction of alpha-synuclein aggregate formation by CSF exosomes from patients with Parkinson's disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. Brain. 2016;139(Pt 2):481–494. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Danzer KM, Kranich LR, Ruf WP. Exosomal cell-to-cell transmission of alpha synuclein oligomers. Mol Neurodegener. 2012;7(1):42. doi: 10.1186/1750-1326-7-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Grey M, Dunning CJ, Gaspar R. Acceleration of alpha-synuclein aggregation by exosomes. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(5):2969–2982. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.585703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Haney MJ, Klyachko NL, Zhao Y. Exosomes as drug delivery vehicles for Parkinson's disease therapy. J Control Rel. 2015;207:18–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.03.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Cooper JM, Wiklander PB, Nordin JZ. Systemic exosomal siRNA delivery reduced alpha-synuclein aggregates in brains of transgenic mice. Mov Disord. 2014;29(12):1476–1485. doi: 10.1002/mds.25978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Jiang XC, Gao JQ. Exosomes as novel bio-carriers for gene and drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2017;521(1-2):167–175. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.02.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Migliore L, Uboldi C, Di Bucchianico S, Coppede F. Nanomaterials and neurodegeneration. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2015;56(2):149–170. doi: 10.1002/em.21931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Valdiglesias V, Kilic G, Costa C. Effects of iron oxide nanoparticles: cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, developmental toxicity, and neurotoxicity. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2015;56(2):125–148. doi: 10.1002/em.21909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Gurr JR, Wang AS, Chen CH, Jan KY. Ultrafine titanium dioxide particles in the absence of photoactivation can induce oxidative damage to human bronchial epithelial cells. Toxicology. 2005;213(1-2):66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2005.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Yarjanli Z, Ghaedi K, Esmaeili A, Rahgozar S, Zarrabi A. Iron oxide nanoparticles may damage to the neural tissue through iron accumulation, oxidative stress, and protein aggregation. BMC Neuroscience. 2017;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12868-017-0369-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Patel S, Jana S, Chetty R, Thakore S, Singh M, Devkar R. Toxicity evaluation of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles reveals neuronal loss in chicken embryo. Drug Chem Toxicol. 2017;27:1–8. doi: 10.1080/01480545.2017.1413110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Gliga AR, Edoff K, Caputo F. Cerium oxide nanoparticles inhibit differentiation of neural stem cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):9284. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09430-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Yuan ZY, Hu YL, Gao JQ. Brain localization and neurotoxicity evaluation of polysorbate 80-modified chitosan nanoparticles in rats. PLoS One. 2015;10(8) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Hu YL, Qi W, Han F, Shao JZ, Gao JQ. Toxicity evaluation of biodegradable chitosan nanoparticles using a zebrafish embryo model. Int J Nanomedicine. 2011;6:3351–3359. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S25853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Oberdorster E. Manufactured nanomaterials (fullerenes, C60) induce oxidative stress in the brain of juvenile largemouth bass. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112(10):1058–1062. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Lazar AN, Mourtas S, Youssef I. Curcumin-conjugated nanoliposomes with high affinity for Abeta deposits: possible applications to Alzheimer disease. Nanomedicine. 2013;9(5):712–721. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2012.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Kuo YC, Wang CT. Protection of SK-N-MC cells against beta-amyloid peptide-induced degeneration using neuron growth factor-loaded liposomes with surface lactoferrin. Biomaterials. 2014;35(22):5954–5964. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Re F, Cambianica I, Zona C. Functionalization of liposomes with ApoE-derived peptides at different density affects cellular uptake and drug transport across a blood-brain barrier model. Nanomedicine. 2011;7(5):551–559. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2011.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Papadia K, Markoutsa E, Mourtas S. Multifunctional LUV liposomes decorated for BBB and amyloid targeting. A. In vitro proof-of-concept. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2017;101:140–148. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2017.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Xiang Y, Wu Q, Liang L. Chlorotoxin-modified stealth liposomes encapsulating levodopa for the targeting delivery against Parkinson's disease in the MPTP-induced mice model. J Drug Target. 2012;20(1):67–75. doi: 10.3109/1061186X.2011.595490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Yuan M, Wang Y, Qin YX. Promoting neuroregeneration by applying dynamic magnetic fields to a novel nanomedicine: superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-gold nanoparticles bounded with nerve growth factor (NGF) Nanomedicine. 2018;14(4):1337–1347. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2018.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Chen Q, Du Y, Zhang K. Tau-targeted multifunctional nanocomposite for combinational therapy of Alzheimer's disease. ACS Nano. 2018;12(2):1321–1338. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b07625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Pai AS, Rubinstein I, Onyuksel H. PEGylated phospholipid nanomicelles interact with beta-amyloid((1-42)) and mitigate its beta-sheet formation, aggregation and neurotoxicity in vitro. Peptides. 2006;27(11):2858–2866. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2006.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Lee ST, Im W, Ban JJ. Exosome-based delivery of miR-124 in a Huntington's disease model. J Mov Disord. 2017;10(1):45–52. doi: 10.14802/jmd.16054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Didiot MC, Hall LM, Coles AH. Exosome-mediated delivery of hydrophobically modified siRNA for Huntingtin mRNA silencing. Mol Ther. 2016;24(10):1836–1847. doi: 10.1038/mt.2016.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.xml (272B, xml)

Articles from Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University

RESOURCES