Abstract
3D-engineered nano-architectures with various functionalities are still difficult to obtain and translate for real-world applications. However, such nanomaterials are naturally abundant and yet wasted, but could trigger huge interest for blue bioeconomy, provided that our understanding of their ultrastructure-function is achieved. To date, the Bouligand pattern in crustaceans shell structure is believed to be unique. Here we demonstrated that in blue crab Callinectes sapidus, the 3D-nanoarchitecture is color-specific, while the blue and red-orange pigments interplay in different nano-sized channels and pores. Thinnest pores of about 20 nm are found in blue shell. Additionally, the blue pigment co-existence in specific Bouligand structure is proved for the green crab Carcinus aestuarii, although the crab does not appear blue. The pigments interplay, simultaneously detected by Raman spectroscopy in color-specific native cuticles, overturns our understanding in crustaceans coloration and may trigger the selective use of particular colored natural nanoarchitectures for broaden area of applications.
Subject terms: Biophysical chemistry, Raman spectroscopy
Introduction
Nikola Tesla would have been surprised to find out that thinking “in terms of energy, frequency, and vibration”, the secrets of the blue crab colors could be elucidated.
Accounted by ecologists among 100 worst invasive alien species in eastern Mediterranean coast1–5, seen by seafood producers both as a threat to benthic shellfish cultures2,4–6 and a potential new commodity in the invaded areas4,6, loved by gourmands as a delicacy, the Atlantic blue crab, Callinectes sapidus, poses an increasing interest, as its wasted shells could be potentially turned in valuable by-product, not only because of chitin, proteins7 and biogenic calcite content, but also as natural, porous, pigmented biomaterial, yet poorly understood as highly ordered nano-architecture posing inspiration for biomimetics8.
Interestingly, C. sapidus cuticle simultaneously features bright blue, red and white anatomical exoskeleton counterparts (Supplementary Fig. 1), known to be important cues for mate selection for reproduction9. However, considering the large diversity of crustaceans’ coloration, research on blue color origin refers mostly to lobster species Homarus americanus10–13 and Homarus gamarus14–19 which is presumed to originate from blue carotenoprotein complexes, where astaxanthin (ATX), an orange carotenoid is non-covalently bonded in crustacyanins10–21. UV/Vis absorption band shifted from 480 nm in ATX monomers12 to 632, 585–595 and 610 nm in isolated α-, β- and γ-crustacyanin12 respectively, suggests the opportunity to exploit vibrational resonance Raman (RR) spectroscopy to selectively detect free or non-covalently bound ATX in custacyanin in intact crab shell by-product.
It is also surprising that the current knowledge on the blue coloration in crustaceans remains controversial, considering the numerous earlier studies10–12,14,15, and more recent computational and experimental approaches13,16–19,22–26. For instance, Gamiz-Hernandez et al.19 showed that β-crustacyanin (not α-) is the responsible pigment for the blue color. Based on theoretical calculations19, it was found that β-crustacyanin (comprising two stacked ATX molecules), induced a bathochromic shift of ATX arising from the polarization effects and steric constrains of the ATX-protein binding site. On the other hand, based on the available models of crustacyanins, van Wijk et al.17 proposed a protonation model involving the keto-groups of the ATX terminals near a water molecule. Controversial conclusions underlying the comparative results of the cuticle ultrastructure in lobster H. americanus raised additional questions regarding its crystalline nature27,28. The “universal” nature of the 3D- hierarchical calcite arrays which follows a twisting plywood path (Bouligand-type pattern) in crustacean exoskeleton has been suggested, based on studies on several species of crabs8,28–32, but lacking any connection with the pigments populating the morphological pattern. Katsikini33 detected ATX only in C. sapidus blue crab cuticle, due to the use of a single laser line (488 nm), which fulfilled the RR conditions for the respective carotenoid only, but suggested that Br and Sr are involved in two different mechanisms contributing to the blue color.
Currently, comprehensive understanding of chemical structure-morphology relationship in blue crab shell is absent, although of high interest for transforming such aquatic porous by-product into added-value material within the blue bioeconomy goal.
Here, relying on combinatory multi-laser RR micro-spectroscopy and imaging, assisted by electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction and computational chemistry, we show that two interplayed pigments and their distribution in the 3D-nanoarchitecture of the plywood path is color-specific and the blue shell of C. sapidus is not exclusively determined by the presence blue pigment, astaxanthin bounded in crustacyanin. Moreover the blue pigment is present in other crab cuticle colors, not necessarily blue.
Comparatively, we employed a co-inhabitant, native2 species, Carcinus aestuarii green crab. The ultimate goal is to properly address such wasted biogenic material within the blue bioeconomy concept.
We hypothesize an additional photonic color component to the overall blue cuticle appearance, sustained by its optical properties9,33 (high reflectance between 380–480 nm, selective absorption33 between 500–700 nm, weak light transmission of about 9.6% of red C. sapidus shell33) and, yet limited, RR scattering data of one blue shell33. Exoskeleton photonic crystal would be sustained, provided that the ultrastructure periodicity influences the propagation of certain light wavelengths and its dielectric properties are tuned by its morphological biochemistry.
Results
The complete experimental approach to extract information on pigments identity and their native distribution in crabs exoskeleton ultrastructure is summarized in the Fig. 1. We combined the unique ability of the multi-laser (resonance) Raman spectroscopic techniques to localize the chemical and structural information, with the morphology from the high resolution scanning electron microscopy (HR-SEM) in conjunction with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) of native blue, red and white shell counterparts of C. sapidus, and the green C. aestuarii crab. The type, number of samples and experimental purpose of all the samples used in the present study are summarized in the Supplementary Table 1.
Multi-laser micro-Raman spectra of blue, red, green and white crab shells
Raman spectra collected from each crab shell color are strongly dependent on the laser excitation wavelength and highlights the free or non-covalently bond astaxanthin (ncb-ATX) occurrence in the colored shells when proper laser excitation is applied (Supplementary Figs. 1C, 2). Overtones and linear combinations of pigments Raman modes analysis is given in Supplementary Fig. 3. It was clearly noted that ν1(C=C) + ν2 (C-C) linear combination showed distinct position for ATX and ncb-ATX, the latter being 22 cm−1 downshifted. Comparative display of the carotenoid ν1 (C=C) Raman band positions in spectra acquired from the four shell types with the three laser lines are showed in the Supplementary Fig. 4.
The blue cuticle
The blue exoskeleton fragments of C. sapidus cuticles under green laser excitation (532 nm) comprised two Raman band components, one strong band assigned to the ν1(C=C) skeletal stretching mode of ATX above 1500 cm−1 and a weaker band (or shoulder) in the 1491–1493 cm−1 range, attributable to the same ν1(C=C) mode in ncb-ATX in carotenoprotein. By contrary, full resonance Raman excitation of carotenoprotein with red laser (632.8 nm) line (which exactly fits crustacyanin extinction maximum12 readily revealed the RR mode arising from the ncb-ATX at 1492 cm−1 (Fig. 2) and denoted “blue band”. This signature is characteristic to the native carotenoprotein in crab shells and its presence with stronger or weaker intensity describes its relatively different abundance in various colored shells. Notably, its presence in green crab spectrum with weaker intensity (Fig. 2), demonstrates the existence of ncb-ATX in blue carotenoprotein from C. aestuarii. In other words, blue pigment is present in green crab shell.
The greater wavelength laser lines (785, 830 and 1064 nm), which are neither resonant to ATX nor its protein complex, always featured a weak shoulder of free ATX band around 1514 cm−1 associated with the stronger mode of ncb-ATX at 1491 to 1492 cm−1 (Supplementary Fig. 2). All Raman bands recorded from the blue shell with 5 laser lines are listed in Table 1 and their assignments are provided according to our computational chemistry results and literature11,12,15,17,24,33.
Table 1.
Raman experimental data/cm−1 of blue C. sapidus cuticle | Calculated Raman modes/cm−1: free ATX, ncb-ATX | Vibrational assignment | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
532 nm | 632.8 nm | 785 nm | 830 nm | 1064 nm | ||
154 | 155 | — | Calcite (T) | |||
281 | 282 | 284 | 281 | — | Calcite (L) | |
712 | 712 | 712 | 714 | 712 | — | v4(CO32−) in calcite |
— | — | 880 | — | — | 875, 882 | ATX δ(CH2) |
— | — | — | — | 892 | — | α-chitin |
953sh | 953sh | 953sh | — | 955 | 923, 929 | ATX ν(C-C) + ρ(CH2) + (CH3), α-chitin, v(PO42−) |
963 | 963 | 963 | 963 | 963sh | 972sh, 972sh | ATX ν4(C-C) + ρ(CH2) + (CH3), α-chitin, v(PO42−) |
1004 | 1004 | 1003 | 1004 | 1004 | 992, 997 | v3 ATX, ncb-ATX ρ(C-CH3), Phe |
— | — | — | — | 1038 | — | proteins (Phe) |
1086 | 1088 | 1086 | 1087 | 1086 | — | v1(CO32−) in calcite |
1154 | 1154 | 1154 | 1154 | 1154 | 1154, 1154 | ATX and ncb-ATX v2(C-C), α-chitin |
1190 | 1190 | 1197 | 1190 | 1190 | 1186, 1189 | ATX, ncb-ATX ν(C-C) |
1205 | 1203 | 1206 | 1202 | — | α-chitin | |
1234 | 1234 | 1234 | 1234 | — | proteins (amide III) | |
1265 | 1264 | 1263 | 1263 | 1263 | 1262, 1269 | ncb-ATX, ATX ρ(C-H), α-chitin |
1301 | 1305 | 1304 | 1303 | 1314, 1307 | ncb-ATX in crustacyanin | |
1325 | — | α-chitin | ||||
1385 | 1375 | 1374 | 1375 | 1375 | 1384, 1384 | ATX, α-chitin |
1412 | — | α-chitin | ||||
1444 | 1453 | 1442 | — | 1448 | 1444, 1425 | ATX, ncb-ATX δasym(CH2,3), α-chitin |
1492 | 1492 | 1492 | 1492 | 1492 | absent, 1494 | v1(C=C)out-of-plane in |
ncb-ATX | ||||||
1514 | — | 1514 | 1514 | 1514 | 1508, absent | ATX, v1(C=C)in-plane |
1517 | 1517sh | absent, 1522 | ncb-ATX v1(C=C)in-plane | |||
— | 1603 | 1604 | — | — | absent, 1609 | ATX, ncb-ATX v(C=C)out-of-plane + |
1621 | 1619 | — | 1621 | — | Proteins (Trp, Tyr, Phe) + v(C=O),), α-chitin | |
— | — | 1657 | — | 1655 | — | α-chitin, proteins (amide I), α-chitin |
— | — | ‘— | — | 1746 | — | Calcite (2v2) |
2117 | 2117 | absent | absent | absent | — | v2 + v4 in ATX, ncb-ATX |
2158 | 2158 | absent | absent | absent | — | v2 + v3 in ATX,ncb-ATX |
2308 | 2308 | absent | absent | absent | — | 2v2 in ATX, ncb-ATX |
absent | 2448 | absent | absent | absent | — | v1 + v4 in ncb-ATX |
2518 | absent | absent | absent | absent | — | v1 + v3 in ATX |
absent | 2646 | absent | absent | absent | — | v1 + v2 in ncb-ATX |
2668 | absent | absent | absent | absent | — | v1 + v2 in ATX |
3028 | absent | absent | absent | absent | — | 2v1 in ATX |
— | — | 2877 | — | 2878 | — | α-chitin v(CH2,3) |
— | — | 2937 | — | 2934 | — | α-chitin v(CH2,3) |
— | — | 2969 | — | 2965 | — | α-chitin v(CH2,3) |
The peaks position was reproducible among animals (Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1C) The relative intensity variability is rather dependent on the local roughness of the shell surface for the incident laser spot and the local interplay of the two pigments ATX and ncb-ATX under focus. Natural, quantitative accumulation of pigments as a function of crab age (all mature crabs) was not aimed here.
We conducted theoretical calculations using the Density Functional Theory (DFT) for the RR spectrum of non-covalently bond ATX (ncb-ATX) and compared it to its free counterpart, to correctly assign the experimentally observed Raman data. Computed Raman modes of isolated ATX featured theoretical v1 band at 1508 cm−1, arising from conjugated in-plane C=C stretching modes, while the calculations for ncb-ATX (ncb-ATX) involved in strong dipole-dipole interactions, which simulated non-covalent binding to the protein carrier, exhibited v1 mode red shifted to 1494 cm−1 (Supplementary Fig. 5). Our calculated v1 positions are similar to respective experimental modes of α-crustacyanin reported in older and more recent studies12,15,17, which indicated good simulation of Raman response of ATX bound in carotenoprotein. The second Raman band themed v2 assigned to the C-C stretching mode of carotenoid skeletal structure was found at 1154 cm−1, being non-sensitive to the non-covalent interaction.
Correlated experimental Raman and theoretical findings clearly suggest that blue shell contains both free and ncb-ATX in carotenoprotein complex. Harmonics and linear combinations of the v1, v2, v3 and v4 modes of ATX or ncb-ATX in the high wavenumber range (2100–3100 cm−1) confirmed the existence of two pigments in the blue shell: they corresponded to ATX modes (Table 1) when the shells were excited with green laser line, and to ncb-ATX, under red laser excitation (Supplementary Fig. 3).
The red, white or green cuticles
The red and white C. sapidus claw cuticles as well as the green ones of C. aestuarii have been similarly investigated, as comparatively shown in Supplementary Fig. 2b–d. Excitation with 532 nm line revealed the presence of ATX, while the 632.8 nm line revealed both signal of ncb-ATX and free ATX in red shells. Weak and noisy Raman signal of pigments has been spuriously detected in white shells, too (Supplementary Fig. 2d). Thus, it appears that the presence of ncb-ATX in crustacyanin complex is not limited to blue shells of C. sapidus only. In other words, shells containing the complex are not necessarily blue, similar to findings on yellow lobsters11, which exhibited strong RR signal of yellow protein, and weak RR signal of ncb-ATX from crustacyanins.
Three colors, same pigments
Multi-peaks Lorentzian fit of the carotenoid v1 band in Raman spectra acquired from blue C. sapidus and green C. aestuarii claw shells (Fig. 2) provides accurate bands composition, revealing other, minor contributions to the main C=C band shape (R2 > 0.99). The difference in position of C=C modes above 1500 cm−1 can be attributed to stretching modes of conjugated C=C bonds of free carotenoids. The C=C mode arising from the ncb-ATX complex consistently appeared 1492 cm−1 (showed as blue shaded band in Fig. 2).
To further clarify the different colors of shells which contain the same pigments, we calculated the relative Raman intensity ratio (R = I1492/I1514) of the two main modes contributing to the overall v1 Raman band, assigned to the ncb-ATX and ATX. The near-infrared 785 nm laser line was used for this purpose, as it provides normal Raman scattering only, thus avoiding resonance Raman contribution of either pigment. As the intensity of normal Raman scattering is directly proportional to the analyte concentration, for similar excitation conditions and collecting optics, the intensity ratio (R = I1492/I1514), gives an estimation of relationship between the content of ncb-ATX and free ATX chromophores in each native shell color. The calculated values of the R ratios defined above are shown in the Table 2 along with their standard errors. Data processing algorithm for the calculation of the R ratio values and the averaged corresponding spectra are shown in the Supplementary Fig. 6.
Table 2.
Shell color type | Pigment Raman ratio: I1492/I1514 (mean ± S.E.) | number of measurements/animal |
---|---|---|
blue | 8.487 ± 0.283 | 10 |
red | 0.757 ± 0.301 | 12 |
green | 2.958 ± 0.277 | 10 |
S.E.- standard errors.
Note the highest value of R = 8.487 ± 0.283, for the blue color, almost 3 times higher than in the green shell, and more than 11 times higher than in the red shell, meaning that blue shells contain the most ncb-AXT chromophores relative to AXT. Due to the natural inhomogeneity of shell surface color, the considerable standard error values are not surprising. Carotenoid signal was most frequently absent from white shells spectra with non-resonant 785 nm excitation (Supplementary Figs. 2 and 4), however, it was randomly detected in several cuticle fragments under resonance excitation conditions.
Summarizing, different colors of C. sapidus and C. aestuarii cuticle arise from the balance of co-existent orange and blue pigments. Surface distribution of pigments in crabs cuticle has been further mapped to support the standard errors of R values described above. StreamLineTM Raman imaging approach allowed for rapid generation of Raman maps of surface distribution of ATX and ncb-ATX signal on blue C. sapidus and dark green C. aestuarii dorsal claw cuticle (Fig. 3). Attempt to do the same analysis for the red shells failed due to the much stronger RR signal superimposed with the background of ATX, which completely covered any trace of the ncb-ATX complex contribution in the StreamLineTM data collection. The obtained Raman images confirmed the co-existence of the both pigments, their inhomogeneity distribution and their interplay.
Pigments distribution in cuticle cross-sections
Biogenic material fractures were obtained by cleaving shells of specific color. Thus, the fracture surface analysis by Raman micro-spectroscopy provided information on the pigments presence in shell cross section. Typical raw RR spectra (532 nm excitation) collected from blue shell cross section at 20, 80, 140, 200, 240, 300, 360 and 420 μm distance from margin showed in the Fig. 4d), revealed characteristic signal of ATX superimposed with strong background. Red laser excitation (632.8 nm) of the same cross section points provided characteristic RR signal of ncb-ATX with even stronger background, (Fig. 4f). However, several typical RR spectra from 0 (surface), 20, 40, 140 and 240 μm distance from shell margin still could be obtained under similar acquisition conditions (1 s, 1 acquisition, 10 mW, 100 x objective).
The ATX and ncb-ATX exhibited well-defined Raman signal collected from the fracture surface and the intensity evolution of carotenoid v1 band was tracked, as showed in the Fig. 4.
The fit of collected data points revealed two distinct depths with high ATX content in blue shell, the first maximum being around 130 μm, and the second at the depth of about 260 μm (Fig. 4). Red and green cuticles exhibit different depth profile of ATX band intensity (Supplementary Fig. 7). Carotenoid content, proportional with the intensity of the v1 Raman band (Supplementary Fig. 7c,f), appeared with variable distribution, with higher content at 10 to 20 μm beneath cuticle surface in both red and green shells, followed by another peak at about 50 μm depth in red and 100 μm in green shell. The data suggest lower, but consistent carotenoid presence towards endocuticle inner layer. Cross section of blue cuticle tracked with the 632.8 nm line revealed highest intensity of ncb-ATX in epicuticle, following a rapid decrease within 20 μm depth, than further slow decrease between 20–140 µm and very weak intensity up to 240 um depth (Fig. 4). Previous immunostaining approach to determine pigments distribution in spiny lobster Palinurus cygnus34 located crustacyanins only at the depth of 7 to 8 μm beneath cuticle surface and in hypodermis of the cuticle.
Blue and green shells turn red-orange when immersed in boiling water or after ethanol extraction, leading to the disappearance of the ncb-ATX resonance Raman band
Additionally, when blue, red and green claw shells were immersed in boiling water (100 °C) or ethanol to probe pigments extraction, Raman analysis of same shell fragments showed that intact ncb-ATX in crustacyanin complex is prerequisite for maintenance of shell native color. Each treatment resulted in complete dissociation of the complex (Supplementary Fig. 8), leaving behind abundant free AXT, which gives intense orange color aspect to the shells. In addition, ethanol extraction appeared simple method of obtaining valuable carotenoid-enriched solution from the shells, which may further be used for carotenoid purification, while preserving the intact porous calcite morphology. (i) C. sapidus blue and red, and C. aestuarii green claw shells changed their native color into red-orange after few seconds of immersion into boiling water (Supplementary Fig. 8a,b). White couterparts of C. sapidus claw remained unchanged. Only ATX could be detected in the treated shells (Supplementary Fig. 8b), while the ncb-ATX RR band was absent. It results that crustacyanin complexes released ATX at boiling water temperature, followed by diminishing of darker color shade, while free AXT, which would not be affected by short exposure to high temperature, remained unaltered. (ii) Likewise, the blue C. sapidus native claw shell turned pinkish red after 14 days of carotenoid extraction in ethanol. The marker RR band of ncb-ATX was not detectable in shells after extraction, indicating total dissociation of the ATX-crustacyanin complex by ethanol. Furthermore, the additional RR analysis of extract solution showed that only free ATX may be retrieved from crab shells after exposure to ethanol, due to the dissociation from crustacyanin under the effect of polar protic solvent treatment.
Mineral composition of the crab claws
Fourier-transform Raman (FT-Raman) data obtained with the 1064 nm laser line excitation revealed the prominent symmetric stretching mode of carbonate ν1(CO32−)35 in calcite, ranging from 1085 to 1088 cm−1, the ν4 in plane bending mode36 around 712 cm−1 and well-defined calcite lattice bands at 155 and 281 cm−1 in all cuticle color types (Supplementary Fig. 9). The intensity and full width at half maximum (FWHM) values of the- v1(CO32−) stretching mode indicated the highest calcite crystallinity in red dactyls, followed by green dactyls, white, and blue palm shells. Significant broadening of the v1 mode to the lower wavenumbers, paired with broadening of the v4 and lattice modes indicates the co-existence of amorphous37 CaCO3 in blue and white shells, while broadening of v1 to higher wavenumbers indicates small inclusions of Mg atoms in calcite crystalline lattice36. The area ratio r of the two Raman band components of calcite stretching mode in blue shell showed a value r = area(1085)/area(1075) of 2.82 (Supplementary Fig. 9). Additionally, α-chitin38,39 could be identified according to its characteristic Raman fingerprint bands at 892, 955, 1059, 1111, 1147, 1202, 1263, 1325, 1375,1412, 1448, 1621, 1655 cm−1 as well as the CH2,3 stretching modes at 2878, 2934 and 2965 cm−1 (Supplementary Fig. 9, Table 1). Weak protein bands35 were observed at 1001, 1038, 1234 cm−1, and possibly contributing to bands at 1621 and 1655 cm−1 (Table 1). Carbonates, α-chitin, proteins and carotenoids all account for the observed FT-Raman bands with variable relative intensity from one beamed point to another. Such relative distribution over the cuticle surface suggested by FT-Raman analysis is confirmed by the Raman maps generated from the signal-to-baseline approach in fast StreamLineTM imaging of blue cuticle surface (Supplementary Fig. 10) excited with the NIR line at 785 nm.
The X-ray powder diffraction data (Fig. 5) confirm the presence of low Mg-calcite through the (1 0 4) peak at d = 3.02, compared with 3.035 in pure calcite, according to results of Boßelmann et al.40 reported for H. americanus and Cancer pagurus. The highest Mg-calcite pattern was observed in red claw (even higher for its corresponding teeth) followed by the white, green and blue cuticle, as showed in the Fig. 5. The FWHM (showed in the insert of Fig. 5) varied from 0.23° in red and green, 0.29° in white to 0.32° 2θ in the blue cuticle. The dominant Mg-calcite of variable crystallinity is associated with small amounts of quartz (probably originated from benthic diatoms inhabiting the cuticle and/or spurious sand micro-grains) in some of the shell parts (especially in the red shell and claw teeth) observed at 26.67° 2θ, while a weak, broaden band centred at 19° 2θ was assigned to α-chitin41,42.
Different crab color cuticles morphology showed systematic differences at ultrastructure level
Performing morphology analysis, an ordered, stacked mineral structure was observed, similar to those reported for other crab species8,28–32. A series of SEM images collected from fractured cuticles of blue shell is showed in the Fig. 6A. Comparative morphological details of the white and red cuticle of C. sapidus and green cuticle of C. aestuarii are given in the Fig. 6B. The averaged distances between pores and canals and their diameter for the white, blue, green and red cuticle are distinct, as showed in the Fig. 6C.
The mineral layers are stacked quasi-parallel to the outer surface and their arrangement defines the epicuticles (detail of detached epicuticle morphology is showed in the Supplementary Fig. 11 for the green shell), the exocuticle, where the layers are thinner, and the endocuticle, where much thicker layers are observed. The mineral layers 3D nanoarchitecture is crossed by pore canals hosting the chitin-protein fibril bundles which follow a helical path normal to the cuticle surface. The canals determine the “macro-pores” which cross the successive mineral layers (Supplementary Fig. 11).
Such morphology explains the strong Raman scattering signal of pigments collected in back scattering configuration normal to cuticle surface, or weak signal when the collection direction is normal to the fracture plan (or parallel with the cuticle surface). Furthermore, the spotted pattern of the pigments interplay from Fig. 3 might be consistent with the canals distribution, each canal being populated with chitin-proteins fibrils, thus strong Raman signal in spotted organic areas has been observed along radial fibrils direction (from cuticle top) surrounded by mineral signal. In general, the signal was constantly weaker when cross section was Raman investigated (as showed in the Fig. 4 and Supplementary Fig. 7). The randomly oriented microcrystals and micro-canals of the shell at the fracture surface exposed for Raman acquisition may have caused increased background, merely impossible uniform focus of adjacent points, resulting band broadening, drastically increased background and decrease of Raman signal-to-background ratio.
The pore canals exhibit complex arrangements, showing grating-like pattern of parallel mineral nanopillars (Fig. 6A), which also follows the helicoid path orientation. This structure, which has nanometer-scale arrangements at subwavelength optics, might be essential for selective light waveguiding through the canals, making the blue shell absorbance peaking between 550-650 nm, red between 400–500 nm, while the white one above 600 nm, which corresponds with the diffuse reflectance data previously reported9,33. To further check any optical correlation, we measured a series of selected cuticle morphological features (Table 3). Each cuticle color revealed different width of pore canals and different distances between rows of pore canals, which in turn results in different grating constants responsible for manipulation of light. A schematic representation of these canals and pores acting as 3D-gratings is showed in the Supplementary Fig. 11.
Table 3.
Morphology element/unit | White cuticle | Blue cuticle | Green cuticle | Red cuticle |
---|---|---|---|---|
Canal diameter/µm |
0.356 ± 0.061 n = 14 |
0.477 ± 0.136 n = 37 |
0.486 ± 0.151 n = 33 |
0.321 ± 0.0489 n = 27 |
Distance between canals/µm |
1.122 ± 0.423 n = 61 |
0.973 ± 0.414 n = 23 |
1.253 ± 0.391 n = 33 |
1.951 ± 1.163 n = 47 |
Pore diameter/nm |
42.739 ± 8.110 n = 26 |
20.406 ± 5.448 n = 70 |
45.475 ± 13.834 n = 90 |
33.695 ± 6.978 n = 32 |
Distance between pores/nm |
34.024 ± 8.891 n = 20 |
50.804 ± 10.780 n = 141 |
43.909 ± 15.404 n = 99 |
177 ± 47 n = 35 |
Epicuticle thickness/µm |
2.285 ± 0.453 n = 18 |
1.189 ± 0.328 n = 18 |
3.471 ± 1.299 n = 30 |
3.268 ± 1.384191 n = 18 |
Exocuticle thickness/µm |
30.727 ± 5.659 n = 21 |
29.174 ± 2.759 n = 6 |
47.030 ± 12.317 n = 22 |
25.050 ± 12.158674 n = 15 |
Endocuticle thickness/µm |
646.234 ± 135.972 n = 11 |
510.447 ± 11.905 n = 6 |
200.615 ± 8.099 n = 4 |
1033.23 ± 221.34 n = 34 |
Thus, the blue cuticle showed canals diameter (averaged values) of 477, green 486, red 321 and white 356 nm while the distance between canals was 977 nm in blue, the lowest among the other color cuticles exceeding 1 μm (Table 3, Fig. 6C). The wall structure of canals showed the thinnest pores diameter in blue cuticle of about 20.4 nm, and the densest pore 3D-array. Combined with the thinnest epicuticle (Supplementary Figs. 12 and 13), the blue shell appeared morphologically distinct.
The finding overturns our understanding of the 3D-nanomaterial with Bouligand patterns from blue crab shells, simultaneously exhibiting blue, red and white color.
Semi-quantitative elemental composition revealed by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) supports the shell color distinct feature. Relative mass fractions (wt%) for the 5 main elements (Ca, C, O, Mg and P) were obtained from 2 to 4 scans (data plotted from individual column colors, Supplementary Fig. 13) corresponding to epicuticle, exocuticle and endocuticle of C. sapidus blue, red and white and C. aestuarii green cuticle, respectively. Semi-quantitative EDX elemental analysis (Supplementary Table S2) confirmed the FT-Raman and XRD conclusions of low Mg-calcite, by consistently revealing Mg in all shell color types and cuticle layers alongside Ca, C and O as main elements, trace of P, K, Na, and spurious S and Cl. Furthermore, detection of P in all shells, correlated with the Raman band at 963 cm−1 containing contribution of PO42− mode (Table 1), could indicate the presence of trace amount of carbonated hydroxyapatite, which is known to occur in crustacean cuticles43,44. However, this supposition is not supported by the XRD data showing that any phosphate mineral was under detection limit in the calcite matrix. Overall, the blue cuticle showed completely distinct composition, revealing the lowest Ca level in epicuticle, further increasing in exocuticle and showing an unusually high amount (up to 71.6 wt%) in endocuticle; lowest C, O and Mg level in endocuticle and highest P content in exocuticle. Such feature, could suggest distinct protective role of endocuticle as the thickest load-bearing layer. In line scan of elemental composition, EDX data constantly showed higher content of C associated to corresponding lower content of Ca, Mg and P, particularly in epicuticle, which mostly contains amorphous minerals and waxy lipoproteins45. None of the collected EDX spectra showed any trace of Br or Sr to support the previous consideration33 on the role of these elements in blue crab coloration (Supplementary Table S2).
Statistical analysis
We conducted t-test and one way ANOVA by comparing two groups at a time.
We first conducted one way ANOVA to four groups (white, blue, green, red) and within certain groups (comparing for certain characters) there were no significant differences. Then we compared series of two groups by ANOVA and by t-test as well, to differentiate the significance between groups. The results were the same (p values) using t test or using ANOVA. Multiple t test was not used here.
Statistical analysis revealed the following: channel diameter measurements gave highly significant difference when comparing white-blue (p = 0.0025), white-green (p = 0.0033), blue-red (p = 0.0001) and green-red (p = 0.0001) but no significant difference between white-red (p = 0.0586) and blue-green (p = 0.8017). The distance between channels have extremely significant difference between white-red (p = 0.0001), highly significant between blue-green (p = 0.0127), blue-red (p = 0.002), green-red (p = 0.0014) but no significant difference comparing white-blue (p = 0.15), white-green (0.14). When we analyzed pore diameters we obtained extremely significant difference comparing white-blue (p = 0.0001), white-red (p = 0.0001), blue-green (p = 0.0001), red-green (p = 0.000), but no significant difference between white and green (p = 0.3392). The distance between pores have extremely significant difference between all groups: white-blue (p = 0.0001), white-green (p = 0.0065), white-red (p = 0.0001), blue-green (p = 0.0001), blue-red (0.0001), green-red (p = 0.0001).
Comparing exocuticle thickness between pairs, all groups revealed extremely significant difference: white-blue (p = 0.0001), white-green (p = 0.0003), white-red (p = 0.0045), blue-green (p = 0.0003), blue-red (p = 0.002), except when we compared green and red (p = 0.651) exocuticles where there was no significant difference. The epicuticles gave statistically relevant differences when comparing green with white (p = 0.0001), blue (p = 0.0001) and red (p = 0.0001), but for the others: white-blue (p = 0.3028), white-red (p = 0.0814) and blue-red (p = 0.1696), no relevant difference was observed. Endocuticle thickness had extremely significant difference between all groups (p = 0.0001), and good statistical relevance for the white-blue comparison (p = 0.0295).
Discussions and outlook
Red ATX and its blue protein complex presence not only in blue, but in red or green crab cuticle is a proof of the complex mechanisms underlying the crustacean colors. Since the previous studies targeted mostly lobsters (H. americanus and H. gamarus)10–19, little is known about the occurrence and localization of astaxanthin-crustacyanin complexes in various crustacean species. Nevertheless, a genetic study conducted to prospect occurrence of genes that encode crustacyanin subunits34 established that crustacyanin is a lineage-specific adaptation developed by common ancestors of certain crustacean groups, however, the genome of C. sapidus was not considered.
Considering the chemical composition described via Raman, XRD and SEM-EDX, the pigments identity, their interplay and distribution in blue crab cuticle is clearly related to its biomineralization, which is different in blue, red white or green cuticles. Although the variability is high, as reflected by the standard deviation of data, the dimensions of the morphological micro- and nano canals and pores organized in regular 3D-nanoarchitecture clearly influence the selective light absorption, transmission, reflection, scattering or diffraction phenomena, thus, contributing to the final color appearance. The chemical composition and morphology resulted from non-resonance micro-Raman analysis is supported by the XRD and SEM-EDX results. It appeared that the crab cuticle color is not governed by the pigments chemistry only, but also by their distribution in specific 3D nano-architecture, which can be considered as a tri-dimensional supergrating.
Combined Raman spectroscopy approach including the proof of pigment identity by analysing Raman overtones and linear combinations, although never applied in earlier Raman studies12,15,17 on carotenoids or carotenoproteins, seemed effective for native exoskeleton pigments analysis. For larger scale approach, Raman tools seemed effective for wasted crustacean materials assessment for their re-use following the blue bioeconomy purpose.
Although the cuticles exhibit low transparency9,33 for visible range, certain light wavelengths can reach, propagating through the channels and pores or scattering/diffracting on their typical 3D-nanoarchitecture. Thus, the blue shell showed a series of individual ultrastructural characteristics of pores, canals and nanopillars network which differentiate from the other shell colors. The aragonite polymorph reported in C. sapidus exoskeleton harvested on Aegean coast33, as well as the presence of Sr and Br to influence the crystalline structure and color33 is not sustained by the present data (Supplementary Table 2) on blue crab harvested on Adriatic Sea coast. Our Raman &XRD data unambiguously showed calcite polymorph only.
Although the complex optical effects are difficult to be simultaneously assessed taking into account the pigments localization and weak light transmission in conjunction with the refraction, scattering, absorption, or diffraction and interference phenomena in the 3D-super-array, their co-existence is supported by the physical-chemical and morphological characteristics. For example, chitin, a transparent polymer for the visible wavelength can modify the weak light transmission via refraction and scattering along the canals hosting the fibril bundles.
The highly ordered porous calcite 3D-supergrating, specific to each crab cuticle and gradually populated with balanced pigments appeared more complex than the extensively investigated structural colors in insects. In the latter, the optical properties of their cuticles stem from highly ordered Bouligand pattern comprising line gratings and/or vanes of their wings structure, with helicoid stacking of chitinous fiber layers46,47. The circular polarized light reflection which has been observed by Michelson in certain insects exoskeleton a century ago and supposed to be due to a “screw” structure (later named Bouligand pattern) could add additional contributions to the overall properties43,44,48 and color appearance not only for human vision, but also for crustacean’s vision. Other proteins can contribute with their specific absorption and/or fluorescence emission along the canals confined between cladding nanopillars walls network, while the nanopillars themselves defining the canals walls structure can act as 3D diffraction grating whose operability in certain diffraction order still has to be understood.
C. sapidus cuticle may inspire further biomimetics avenues, since there are no clear-cut borders between blue, red and white shells. Since the crab cuticle can manipulate light with its combined chemical structure and morphology, light absorption and propagation in wavelength dependent manner could warrants attractive applications of the porous magnesian calcite supergratings. In the light of present findings, crab shells could potentially trigger the starting point of new, effective, advanced materials that could serve as porous layer for preventing infections spreading49, control molecular solutions loading and slow releasing, bacterial therapies, or develop new, effective, porous biostimulants for soils remediation and agricultural strategies, in line with the most innovative blue bioeconomy approach50.
Conclusions
Non-destructive multi-laser micro-Raman spectroscopy and imaging revealed that native claw shells in the Atlantic blue crab C. sapidus from invaded Adriatic Sea contain both the aggregated and the non-covalently bound astaxanthin in carotenoproteins. Further investigation of red and white C. sapidus and green C. aestuarii claw shells revealed that the two pigments are ubiquitously present in investigated shells, even in seemingly unpigmented white shells, albeit to much lesser extent. Thus, non-covalently bound astaxanthin in crustacyanins is not the only factor responsible for dark blueish and purplish color, but rather participates in formation of apparent color alongside free carotenoids and the 3D nanostructured regular array of Mg-calcite on organic scaffold. The pigments were found to co-localize over the cuticle surface and in its cross-section, with highest distribution in exocuticle layer. C. sapidus and C. aestuarii also may have a structural color component, derived from the 3D-nanostructured regular array of Mg-calcite on organic scaffold.
Materials and Methods
Preparation of crab shells
Atlantic blue crabs (C. sapidus) and Mediterranean green crabs (C. aestuarii) were obtained from fishermen who caught them by gillnets and traps in Parila Lagoon (southeast Adriatic Sea, Croatia)2,6. Crabs were brought to laboratory and frozen at −20 °C until needed. Before analysis, the crabs were thawed and their claws were dissected and cleaned from soft tissue that was inside using scissors, tweezers and tap water. Shells were then thoroughly washed in cold running tap water. 10 mature C. sapidus individuals (carapace width about 12 cm), comprising 5 males and 5 females (Supplementary Table S1), differing in color pattern and shades (Fig. 1) were selected (males feature only blue and white shells, while females blue, white and red shells). Additionally, 3 mature C. aestuarii individuals were similarly considered. Shells were further cut into smaller pieces to fit the size requirements for respective analysis technique. Sample pieces of cuticle were consistently taken from mature specimens featuring the most intense coloration of the claw palm. Red and green samples were taken from claw dactyls, as illustrated in several samples depicted in the Supplementary Fig. 1. The type and number of samples used in the present study is summarized in the Supplementary Table 1.
Theoretical calculation
Geometry optimizations and Density Functional Theory (DFT) frequency calculations of the isolated astaxanthin molecule and astaxanthin near water molecules were performed with the Gaussian 09 software package51, at B3LYP/6-311 G(d,p) level of theory51–56. The solvent effects have been considered by using the implicit SMD model56.
Multi-laser micro-raman spectroscopy analysis
Micro-Raman analysis was conducted on a Renishaw InVia confocal Raman microscope (Renishaw, UK). Four laser lines were used on this device: 532 nm excitation was provided by a Cobolt diode pumped solid state (DPSS), air cooled laser, He-Ne- laser provided the 632.8 nm excitation, and near-infrared excitation was provided by two diode lasers emitting at 785 and 830 nm. Spectral resolution was 0.5 cm−1 for visible laser line and 1 cm−1 for NIR lines. WiRETM 3.4 software (Renishaw, United Kingdom) was used for data acquisition. The spectra were acquired either in single-point scan, or in StreamLine imaging mode (described later), on a mobile XYZ HSES (high-speed encoded) stage.
Bruker Equinox 55 FT-IR spectrometer with integrated FRA 106/S IR Raman module was used for to record FT-Raman spectra. A Nd:YAG laser emitting at 1064 nm with 350 mW laser power was used for excitation, and signal was detected by a liquid nitrogen cooled Ge detector. Spectral resolution was 4 cm−1 and 300 scans were co-added.
Due to specific sample surface characteristics (as discussed in Results section) various signal intensity was recorded from different parts of shells. Nevertheless, to keep signal acquisition parameters uniform, we used single scans with integration time and laser power to 1 s and 100 mW, respectively, for short-range (100–1800 cm−1) and 10 s and 20 mW for extended range scans (100–3200 cm−1), for 532, 632.8, 785 and 830 nm lines. The inhomogeneity of claw surface, both in relief and pigment content, made it challenging to record optimal signal-to-noise ratio. Spectra acquired with 532 and 632.8 nm excitation lines featured incremental fluorescence background typical for carotenoid pigments while spectra acquired with 785, 830 and 1064 nm laser line excitation featured low or negligible spectral background.
Spectra of liquid sample, i.e. the astaxanthin-enriched ethanol extract, were acquired on a DeltaNu compact, dispersive Raman spectrometer (Intevac, United States). The 532 nm excitation line was used, and spectra were recorded with 8 cm−1 spectral resolution from samples prepared in 1 ml vials, using the NuSpec software (Intevac, United States).
To support the presented data, Raman spectra were collected from 10 blue crabs (5 males and 5 females) and 3 green crabs. Examples of shell fragments are showed in Supplementary Fig. 1 and the description of measurements are summarized in the Supplementary Table 1. Each blue crab individual resulted in dozens of shell fragments of blue and white (males) and blue, red and white (females). The shell fragments were sub-fragmented for different analyses, as described.
Streamline raman imaging
Raman images were produced on surfaces of blue and red C. sapidus and green C. aestuarii claw shells using the StreamLineTM image acquisition facility of the Renishaw instrument. Both the 532 and 785 nm excitation lines were used separately, paired with 20x objective (NA 0.35). Firstly, a rectangular area to be analysed, 90 × 90 µm in size, was defined on the live video image. This area resulted in 9000 spectral acquisition points. The Raman image was acquired under a continuous laser beam by automatic movement of the stage to achieve 1 s exposure time per image pixel. The v1 mode of free ATX, centred around 1514 cm−1 and the v1 mode of ncb-ATX, centred around 1492 cm−1 were selected for creating separate images under the “signal to baseline” criterion. The images were then overlaid to produce composite pigment distribution maps.
Spectral data processing
Raman and XRD spectra were processed in Origin 6.1 software (OriginLab, United States). Background subtraction was applied when needed, by creating a user-defined, automatic, 10 points baseline function and iteratively modifying it using the subtraction facility of the Origin software. Lorentzian fit multi-peak was applied for the Raman spectra in the 1425 to 1600 cm−1 range, estimating the initial half width and obtaining the peaks components position, area and center and yielding the coefficient of determination R2 higher than 0.99. Calculation of Raman intensity ratio (R) of ncb-ATX band to ATX was done after background subtraction from spectra acquired from different shell color types with 785 nm excitation and subsequently comparing the intensity of the mode at 1492 cm−1 (ncb-ATX) and the mode at 1514 cm−1 (ATX) as R = I1492/I1514 (Supplementary Fig. 6). Normalization of spectra was done by dividing all y data of spectral datasets by the intensity value of the carbonate stretching band.
Additional shells treatment
High temperature denaturation of astaxanthin-crustacyanin complex
Blue, red and white pieces of C. sapidus and green pieces of C. aestuarii claw cuticle were placed into Petri plate containing boiling water. Water was heated on a magnetic hot plate magnetic stirrer to 100 °C, and pieces of shells were kept in boiling water until their color changed to orange. Shells were then taken out of water using tweezers, dried and subsequently analyzed with the Raman microscope. Raman spectra were acquired from treated shells using the 532, 632.8, 785 and 1064 nm laser lines, and spectra were compared to those acquired from native blue and green shells.
Crude ethanol extraction of shell pigments
Pieces of blue shells from C. sapidus claw were placed in vials containing 4 ml of ethanol. Raman analysis of both shells and the supernatant was conducted 14 days after the beginning of extraction. Shells and carotenoid microcrystals were analyzed with the Renishaw Raman microscope. The astaxanthin-enriched extract was fast analysed in liquid state with the DeltaNu Advantage 532 Raman spectrometer with 532 nm excitation line and 10 s integration time set via NuSpec software.
X-ray powder diffraction
Shell fragments were finely ground in an agate mortar and their mineral composition was verified by X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD), using a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer in Bragg-Brentano geometry, with a Cu tube with λK = 0.15418 nm, Ni filter and a LynxEye detector. Corundum (NIST SRM1976a) is used as an internal standard. The data were collected on a 5–64° 2θ interval at a 0.02° 2θ step, measuring each step for 0.5 seconds. The identification of mineral phases was performed with the Diffrac.Eva 2.1 software (Bruker AXS) using the PDF2 (2012) database.
Scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy
SEM imaging and EDX measurements were accomplished with a SU8230 Hitachi ultra-high resolution cold-field emission scanning electron microscope. The instrument allows for a combination of topographical and compositional information at a feature resolution of up to 1 nm in optimal conditions. Pieces of claw shells were dried in oven at 40 °C and kept in a container with CaCl2 bottom layer to avoid atmospheric water absorption. Before analysis, samples were adherently placed on Hitachi stub SEM holders (aluminium holder with M4 threads covered with carbon discs of 3 mm thickness). A Quorum Q150T sputtering sample coater capable of gold sputtering of controlled thickness for high resolution imaging, and evaporating carbon for EDX analysis was employed. Gold coating thickness was 10 nm (density 19.32 g/m3) at a rate of 14 nm/min. An Oxford energy-dispersive x-ray module (Oxford, UK) was used for elemental analysis of shells.
Statistical analyses
were made using unpaired t-test on GraphPad software and one way analysis of ANOVA (one way ANOVA) between groups. Standard deviation was calculated using Excel software. For statistical relevance, values of p ≤ 0.05 were considered significant, p ≤ 0.01 very significant, p ≤ 0.001 extremely significant.
We first conducted one way ANOVA to four groups (white, blue, green, red) and within certain groups (comparing for certain characters) there were no significant differences. Then we compared series of two groups by ANOVA and by t-test as well, to differentiate the significance between groups. The results were the same (p values) using t test or using ANOVA. Multiple t test was not used here.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7 2007–2013) under grant agreement nr. 291823 Marie Curie FP7-PEOPLE-2011-COFUND (The new International Fellowship Mobility Programme for Experienced Researchers in Croatia - NEWFELPRO). This work has been prepared as an additional contribution exceeding the scope of the project “Environmental aquaculture and seafood monitoring in South-Adriatic coast (Croatia) using Raman spectroscopy techniques and SERS-based sensors (acronym JADRANSERS)” which has received funding through NEWFELPRO project under Grant Agreement nr. 5. This work was carried out using the Babeş-Bolyai University Research Infrastructure, financed by the Romanian Government through the programme PN II—Capacities - project “Integrated Network for Interdisciplinary Research (INIR)”, with direct public link to ERRIS: https://erris.gov.ro/Institute-of-Physics-IOAN-UR. B. G. has been partly supported by Croatian Science Foundation under the project IP-2016–06–9884 and VIF2018 funding scheme of University of Dubrovnik. We thank Professor Simion Astilean from Babes-Bolyai University for useful discussions and comments on the manuscript and particularly, on the light interactions with supergratings. Mr. Stanko from Parilla Lagoon, Croatia is highly acknowledged for prompt crabs capture whenever it was needed.
Author contributions
F.N. and S.C.P. designed the research, conducted Raman spectroscopy analyses, collected, processed and analyzed data and wrote the manuscript, B.G. established the sampling area, selected the crabs specimens, assessed their biological status, and raised attention on possible specific pigments accumulation in wasted crab shells, specific for their invasive spreading area. V.C. produced the theoretical D.F.T. calculations, L.B.-T. and M.S. conducted SEM-EDX data acquisition, interpretation and statistics. T.T. conducted the mineralogy assessment of the crab shells and recorded and analyzed the XRD data. All authors contributed to the data analysis, interpretation, manuscript writing and approved its final version.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available within the manuscript, its supplementary information and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-60031-4.
References
- 1.Onofri V, Dulčić J, Conides A, Matić-Skoko S, Glamuzina B. The occurrence of the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus Rathbun, 1896 (Decapoda, Brachyura, Portunidae) in the eastern Adriatic (Croatian coast) Crustaceana. 2008;81:403–409. doi: 10.1163/156854008783797561. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Glamuzina L, et al. Population dynamics and reproduction of Mediterranean green crab Carcinus aestuarii in Parila Lagoon (Neretva estuary, Adriatic Sea, Croatia) as fishery management tools. Mar. Coast. Fish. 2017;9:260–270. doi: 10.1080/19425120.2017.1310155. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dulčić J, Tutman P, Matić-Skoko S, Glamuzina B. Six years from from first record ot popolation establishment: the case of the Blue crab, Callinectes sapidus Rathvun, 1896 (Brachyura, Portunidae) in the Neretva River delta (South-Eastern Adriatic Sea, Croatia) Crustaceana. 2011;84:1211–1220. doi: 10.1163/156854011X587478. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mancinelli G, et al. The Atlantic blue crab Callinectes sapidus in southern European coastal waters: distribution, impact and prospective invasion management strategies. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017;119:5–11. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.02.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Streptaris N, Zenetos A. Alien marine species in the Mediterranean – the 100 “worst invasives” and their impact. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2013;7:87–118. doi: 10.12681/mms.180. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mancinelli G, et al. The trophic position of the Atlantic blue crab Callinectes sapidus Rathbun 1896 in the food web of Parila Lagoon (South Eastern Adriatic, Croatia): a first assessment using stable isotopes. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2016;17:634–643. doi: 10.12681/mms.1724. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Antunes-Valcareggi SA, Ferreira SR, Hense H. Enzymatic hydrolysis of Blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) waste processing to obtain chitin, protein, and astaxanthin-enriched extract. J. Environ. Agricult. Sci. 2017;3:81–92. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yao H, et al. Crab shells as sustainable templates from nature for nanostructured battery electrodes. Nano Lett. 2013;13:3385–3390. doi: 10.1021/nl401729r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Baldwin J, Johnsen S. The importance of color in mate choice of the blue crab Callinectes sapidus. J. Exp. Biol. 2009;212:3762–3768. doi: 10.1242/jeb.028027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Buchwald M, Jencks WP. Properties of the crustacyanins and the yellow lobster shell pigment. Biochemistry. 1968;7:844–859. doi: 10.1021/bi00842a043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Salares VR, Young NM, Bernstein HJ, Carey PR. Resonance Raman spectra of lobster shell carotenoproteins and a model astaxanthin aggregate. A possible photobiological function for the yellow protein. Biochemistry. 1977;16:4751–4756. doi: 10.1021/bi00640a034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Salares VR, Young NM, Bernstein HJ, Carey PR. Mechanisms of spectral shifts in lobster carotenoproteins. The resonance Raman spectra of ovoverdin and the crustacyanins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1979;576:176–191. doi: 10.1016/0005-2795(79)90496-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ferrari, M. et al. Structural characterization of recombinant crustacyanin subunits from the lobster Homarus americanus. Acta Cryst. F68, 846–853 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 14.Cheeseman DF, Zagalsky PF, Ceccaldi HJ. Purification and properties of crustacyanin. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 1966;164:130–151. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1966.0017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Britton G, et al. Carotenoid blues: Structural studies on carotenoproteins. Pure Appl. Chem. 1997;69:2075–2084. doi: 10.1351/pac199769102075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cianci M, et al. The molecular basis of the coloration mechanism in lobster shell: β-crustacyanin at 3.2-Å resolution. PNAS. 2002;99:9795–9800. doi: 10.1073/pnas.152088999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.van Wijk AAC, et al. Predominant contribution of excitonic interactions to the bathochromic shift in α-crustacyanin, the blue carotenoprotein in the carapace of the lobster Homarus gammarus. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:1438–1445. doi: 10.1021/ja045049+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rhys NH, et al. Deriving the ultrastructure of α-crustacyanin using lower-resolution structural and biophysical methods. J. Synchroton Rad. 2011;18:79–83. doi: 10.1107/S0909049510034977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gamiz-Hernandez AP, Angelova IN, Send R, Sundholm D, Kaila VRI. Protein-induced color shift of carotenoids in β-crustacyanin. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2015;54:11564–11566. doi: 10.1002/anie.201501609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cuthill IC, et al. The biology of color. Science. 2017;357:eaan022. doi: 10.1126/science.aan0221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Williams TL, et al. Dynamic pigmentary and structural coloration within cephalopod chromatophore organs. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1004. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08891-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Durbeej B, Eriksson LA. On the bathochromic shift of the absorption by astaxanthin in crustacyanin: a quantum chemical study. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003;375:30–38. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(03)00800-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Neugebauer J, Veldstra J, Buda F. Theoretical spectroscopy of astaxanthin in crustacyanin proteins: absorption, circular dichroism, and nuclear magnetic resonance. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2011;115:3216–3225. doi: 10.1021/jp111579u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Christensson N, et al. Origin of the bathochromic shift of astaxanthin in lobster protein: 2D electronic spectroscopy investigation of β-crustacyanin. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2013;117:11209–11219. doi: 10.1021/jp401873k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Begum S, et al. On the origin and variation of colors in lobster carapace. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015;17:16723–16732. doi: 10.1039/C4CP06124A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Loco D, Buda F, Lugtenburg J, Mennucci B. The dynamic origin of color tuning in proteins revealed by a carotenoid pigment. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018;9:2404–2410. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Romano P, Fabritius H, Raabe D. The exoskeleton of the lobster Homarus americanus as an example of a smart anisotropic biological material. Acta Biomater. 2007;6:301–309. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2006.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cheng L, Wang L, Karlsson AM. Image analyses of two crustacean exoskeletons and implications of the exoskeletal microstructure on the mechanical behaviour. J. Mater. Res. 2008;23:2854–2872. doi: 10.1557/JMR.2008.0375. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zimmer-Faust RK, Fielder DR, Heck KL, Jr., Coen LD, Morgan SG. Effects of tethering on predatory escape by juvenile blue crabs. Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser. 1994;111:299–303. doi: 10.3354/meps111299. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Raabe D, Sachs C, Romano P. The crustacean exoskeleton as an example of a structurally and mechanically graded biological nanocomposite material. Acta Mater. 2005;53:4281–4292. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Giraud-Guille M-M. Plywood structures in nature. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 1998;3:221–227. doi: 10.1016/S1359-0286(98)80094-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Compère PH, Goffinet G. Ultrastructural shape and three-dimensional organization of the intracuticular canal systems in the mineralized cuticle of the green crab Carcinus maenas. Tissue Cell. 1987;19:839–857. doi: 10.1016/0040-8166(87)90024-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Katsikini M. Detailed spectroscopic study of the role of Br and Sr in coloured parts of the Callinectes sapidus crab claw. J. Struct. Biol. 2016;195:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2016.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wade NM, Tollenaere A, Hall MR, Degnan BM. Evolution of a novel carotenoid-binding protein responsible for crustacean shell color. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2009;26:1851–1864. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Perrin J, et al. Raman characterization of synthetic magnesian calcites. Am. Min. 2016;101:2525–2538. doi: 10.2138/am-2016-5714. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wang D, Hamm LM, Bodnar RJ, Dove PM. Raman spectroscopic characterization of the magnesium content in amorphous calcium carbonates. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2012;43:543–548. doi: 10.1002/jrs.3057. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wysokowski M, et al. Renewable chitin from marine sponge as a thermostable biological template for hydrothermal synthesis of hematite nanospheres using principles of extreme biomimetics. Bioinspired Materials. 2013;1:12–22. [Google Scholar]
- 38.de Gelder J, de Gussem K, Vandenabeele P, Moens L. Reference database of Raman spectra of biological molecules. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2007;38:1133–1147. doi: 10.1002/jrs.1734. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rygula A, et al. Raman spectroscopy of proteins: a review. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2013;44:1061–1076. doi: 10.1002/jrs.4335. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Boßelmann F, Romano P, Fabritius H, Raabe D, Epple M. The composition of the exoskeleton of two crustacea: the American lobster Homarus americanus and the edible crab Cancer pagurus. Thermochim. Acta. 2007;463:65–68. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2007.07.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Paralikar KM, Balasubramanya RH. Electron diffraction study of ɑ-chitin. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Lett. Ed. 1984;22:543–546. doi: 10.1002/pol.1984.130221006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wang M, Xue H, Feng Z, Cheng B, Yang H. Increase of tensile strength and toughness of bio-based diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A with chitin nanowhiskers. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0177673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Raabe D, et al. Discovery of a honeycomb structure in the twisted plywood patterns of fibrous biological nanocomposite tissue. J. Crystal Growth. 2005;283:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.05.077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zimmermann EA, et al. Mechanical adaptability of the Bouligand-type structure in natural dermal armour. Nat. Commun. 2013;4:2634. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Roer R, Dillaman R. The structure and calcification of the crustacean cuticle. Am. Zool. 1984;24:893–909. doi: 10.1093/icb/24.4.893. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Neville, A. C. Calcification in Biology of the arthropod cuticle. Zoophysiology and Ecology, vol 4/5 307–308. 10.1007/978-3-642-80910-1 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1975).
- 47.Kinoshita, S. Beetles and Other Insects in Structural colors in the realm of nature, 129-159 (World Scientific Publishing, 2008).
- 48.Horváth, G. & Varju, D. Polarization Sensitivity in Crustaceans in Polarized Light in animal vision, 247–266 (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2004).
- 49.Bhattacharjee T, Datta SS. Bacterial hopping and trapping in porous media. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2075. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10115-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Nekvapil F, et al. From blue bioeconomy toward circular economy through high-sensitivity analytical research on waste blue crab shells. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019;7:16820–16827. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04362. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 09 Revision E.01. Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT (2016).
- 52.Becke AD. A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories. J. Chem. Phys. 1993;98:1372–1377. doi: 10.1063/1.464304. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lee C, Yang W, Parr RC. Development of the Colic-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B. 1988;37:785–789. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Vosko SH, Wilk L, Nusair M. Accurate spin-dependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calculations: a critical analysis. Can. J. Phys. 1980;58:1200–1211. doi: 10.1139/p80-159. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Stephens PJ, Devlin FJ, Chabalowski CF, Frisch MJ. Ab initio calculation of vibrational absorption and circular dichroism spectra using Density functional force fields. J. Phys. Chem. 1994;98:11623–11627. doi: 10.1021/j100096a001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Marenich AV, Cramer C, Truhlar DG. Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2003;113:6378–6396. doi: 10.1021/jp810292n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available within the manuscript, its supplementary information and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.