Abstract
Juvenile hormones (JHs) are sesquiterpenoids synthesized by the corpora allata (CA). They play critical roles during insect development and reproduction. The first JH was described in 1934 as a “metamorphosis inhibitory hormone” in Rhodnius prolixus by Sir Vincent B. Wigglesworth. Remarkably, in spite of the importance of R. prolixus as vectors of Chagas disease and model organisms in insect physiology, the original JH that Wigglesworth described for the kissing-bug R. prolixus remained unidentified. We employed liquid chromatography mass spectrometry to search for the JH homologs present in the hemolymph of fourth instar nymphs of R. prolixus. Wigglesworth’s original JH is the JH III skipped bisepoxide (JHSB3), a homolog identified in other heteropteran species. Changes in the titer of JHSB3 were studied during the 10-day long molting cycle of 4th instar nymph, between a blood meal and the ecdysis to 5th instar. In addition we measured the changes of mRNA levels in the CA for the 13 enzymes of the JH biosynthetic pathway during the molting cycle of 4th instar. Almost 90 years after the first descriptions of the role of JH in insects, this study finally reveals that the specific JH homolog responsible for Wigglesworth’s original observations is JHSB3.
Subject terms: Physiology, Zoology
Introduction
Sir Vincent B. Wigglesworth, the famous British insect endocrinologist, published a series of three classical manuscripts in the years 1934, 1936 and 1940 that described the existence of an “inhibitory hormone” that prevented metamorphosis in the early nymphal stages of the blood-sucking bug Rhodnius prolixus1–3. The manuscripts contained a series of elegant studies, including a parabiosis techniques that allowed the mixing of the hemolymph of fourth and fifth instar nymphs, as well as corpora allata (CA) transplantation experiments. These studies permitted Wigglesworth to demonstrate for the first time the existence of an “inhibitory hormone” secreted by the CA and delivered to target tissues by the hemolymph. In his latest article, Wigglesworth proposed for the first time to name the “inhibitory hormone” as “juvenile hormone” (JH)3. Wigglesworth also used transplantation and parabiosis experiments to reveal that the CA of the 4th instar nymphs of R. prolixus was an equally good source of a “yolk-forming hormone”, whereas the CA of a 5th instar nymph was ineffective. He concluded that only a single hormone, the “Juvenile Hormone”, was responsible for both actions, the inhibition of metamorphosis, as well as the control of development of the reproductive organs in the adult4.
After the pioneering studies by Wigglesworth and others, the chemical nature of JH remained unidentified until the late 1960’s. The first two JHs, named JH I and II, were isolated from the moth Hyalophora cecropia. They were identified as sesquiterpenes, with a methyl ester (α, β-unsaturated) at the C1 position and an epoxide ring at the C10-C11 position5,6. Juvenile hormone III, the homolog found in most insects, was described in 1973 from the moth Manduca sexta7. Finally, two double-epoxidated compounds were later reported, JH III bisepoxide (JHB3) in Drosophila melanogaster8, and JH III skipped bisepoxide (JHSB3) in the heteropteran Plautia stali9,10. Surprisingly, in spite of the importance of R. prolixus, as a vector of Chagas disease and as a model organism in insect physiology, the identity of Wigglesworth’s original JH remained unknown.
We have previously described the potential of mass spectrometry (MS) based protocols for structural identification and quantification of JH homologues from insect samples11,12. More recently, we reported on a liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) protocol for the identification and quantification of the five most common JH homologs13. This protocol allows the detection of JH I, JH II, JH III, JH III bisepoxide (JHB3) and JH III skipped bisepoxide (JHSB3) in a single LC-MS/MS run. In the present study, this modified LC-MS/MS method was utilized to screen the hemolymph of 4th instar nymphs of R. prolixus. Our studies revealed that the Wigglesworth’s original JH is JHSB3, a JH homolog previously identified in several heteropteran species9,13,14. The changes in the titer of JHSB3 were measured in the hemolymph of R. prolixus 4th instar nymphs during the molting cycle, and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) studies revealed the changes of mRNA levels in the CA for the 13 enzymes of the JH biosynthetic pathway during the molting cycle of 4th instar nymphs.
Results
Identification of jhsb3 from the hemolymph of R. prolixus
The screening for five JH homologs (e.g., JH I, JH II, JH III, JHB3 and JHSB3) using LC-MS/MS in the hemolymph of 4th instar nymphs of R. prolixus revealed only the presence of JHSB3 (Fig. 1A). The method is based on reverse phase LC with electrospray ionization as interface with a triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer. The latter was operated under multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode, detecting fragmentation ions after collision-induced dissociation (CID)13. While the JH analogs are separated in the LC domain, their unique fragmentation patterns allows for a highly selective detection which provides unequivocal identification and trace-level quantification (Supplemental Table S1). For JHSB3, we screened for four fragmentation channels (e.g., 283 → 233, 283 → 145, 283 → 119, and 283 → 205) in order to increase identification confidence (see comparison between the signal obtained from the R. prolixus hemolymph and the JHSB3 standard in Fig. 1B). Each of the fragmentation channels were confirmed by obtaining highly accurate mass measurements from a certified JHSB3 standard analyzed with an ultra-high resolution mass spectrometer (Fig. 1C) (<1 ppm mass error, details in Supplemental Table S2). The m/z signals from 283 corresponds to the protonated pseudomolecular ion ([M + H]+; C17H26O4+, JHSB3 parent ion) and m/z 233, 205, 145 and 119 correspond to fragment ions C15H21O2+, C14H21O+, C11H13+ and C9H11+, respectively. The quantification of the JHSB3 from the R. prolixus hemolymph was done using deuterated JH III (JH III-D3) as internal standard, as previously described13.
JHSB3 hemolymph titer during the molting cycle of 4th instar nymphs
Hemolymph was obtained from blood-fed 4th instar nymphs every day during the 10 days of the molting cycle, as well as just before blood-feeding. JHSB3 titer was measured using a LC-MS/MS protocol13. Addition of deuterated JH III as an internal standard enables the absolute quantification of JHs13. The changes in the titer of JHSB3 detected in hemolymph of 4th instar nymph after blood feeding are presented in Fig. 2. Titer was low before feeding and significantly increased by day 2 after blood feeding. It remained relatively constant with a titer around 0.5 fmol/µl until day 5, reaching a peak of around 1 fmol/µl at day 6–7. JHSB3 titer decreased by day 8, and were low until ecdysis.
Developmental changes in mRNA levels for the JH biosynthetic enzymes
The biosynthetic pathway of JH in the CA of insects includes 13 enzymatic reactions, and it is generally divided into early and late steps (Fig. 3). The early steps follow the mevalonate pathway (MVAP) to form farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP). In the late steps, often named the JH-specific branch, conversion of FPP to JHSB3 is catalyzed by five enzymes. Annotation of twelve of the thirteen genes encoding the JH-biosynthetic enzymes was described in the original report of the R. prolixus genome15. To design primers to study the expression of the thirteen enzymes, we reviewed those annotations (Supplemental Table S3). Each of the eight MVAP enzymes seem to be encoded by single-copy genes. Seven of the eight MVAP enzyme genes were correctly predicted. Hydroxymethyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGR) was not originally annotated in the genome manuscript15. Our search revealed the presence of a non-annotated sequences with homology to insect’s HMGRs.
Four of the “late-steps” JH biosynthetic enzymes seem to also be encoded by single-copy genes. Three of these genes were correctly annotated. The original annotation of juvenile acid methyl transferase (JHAMT) was incorrect (RPRC004476). This gene is not expressed in the CA and can therefore be ruled out as being part of the JH biosynthetic pathway. The true JHAMT, identified in this study, is RPRC011659. The search for farnesol dehydrogenase (FOLD) was more complex. The original insect gene, encoding a NADP+-dependent short chain dehydrogenase (SDR) was described in Aedes aegypti16. We found ten SDRs with homology higher than 35% (Supplemental Table S4). Tissue specificity analysis revealed that 4 of them were expressed in the CA (Supplemental Fig. S1). We studied the expression of these 4 genes in the CA during the molting cycle of 4th instar nymph (Supplemental Fig. S2), based on tissue specificity and pattern of expression we selected FOLD 9 for further analysis.
After the re-annotation of the JH-biosynthetic enzymes, we selected the 13 putative genes to study the expression changes during the molting cycle. The accession numbers and primer sequences for the housekeeping gene 60S ribosomal protein L32 and the 13 enzyme genes are included in Supplemental Table S3. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) confirmed that the 13 genes were expressed in the CA (Supplemental Fig. S3). We compared the levels of expression of the genes encoding the 13 JH biosynthetic enzymes at a time of high expression for most genes (day 8 after blood feeding). There was a 350-fold difference in the levels of mRNA expression in the CA among the genes analyzed (Supplemental Fig. S4). Transcripts for the two last enzymes, JHAMT and epoxidase (EPOX) were the most abundant. The analysis of the expression changes during the molting cycle revealed that transcript levels for most of the enzymes were low during the first 3 days. The maximum relative mRNA levels for most enzymes were detected by day 5–8 after blood feeding (Fig. 4).
Discussion
JHSB3 is the circulating hormone in hemolymph of R. prolixus
Our studies revealed that the JH originally described in R. prolixus by Wigglesworth is JHSB3, a hormone previously identified in four additional species of Hemiptera-Heteroptera. JHSB3 was originally described in P. stali (Pentatomomorpha, Pentatomidae)9. Later it was reported in Pyrrhocoris apterus (Pentatomomorpha, Pyrrhocoridae)14. We recently described the presence of JHSB3 in Oncopeltus fasciatus (Pentatomomorpha, Pyrrhocoridae) and in the kissing-bug Dipetalogaster maxima (Cimicomorpha, Reduvidae)13. In the present study the unambiguous identification was based on multiple reaction monitoring analysis using four channels and parallel ultra-high resolution FT-ICR MS/MS confirmation of the purity of the JHSB3 standard and identification of the fragment ions (Fig. 1B,C). It is important to emphasize that the LC-MS/MS protocol not only provided accurate information on the identity of the JH homologs present in the hemolymph of R. prolixus, but also ruled out the presence of the additional four JHs surveyed by our method. In a recent study, we analyzed the five JHs present in biological samples from nine different insect species belonging to four orders. JHSB3 was the only JH homolog present in Heteroptera, and it was absent in samples from Diptera, Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera13. Pentatomomorpha and Cimicomorpha are two closely related infra-orders in the sub-order Heteroptera17. The five Heteropteran species examined up to now belong to these two infra-orders, therefore more studies are needed to conclude if JHSB3 is a homolog exclusively present in all members of the sub-order Heteroptera, as well as in other groups of Hemiptera.
The JH biosynthetic pathway in R. prolixus
We also investigated the JH biosynthetic pathway in R. prolixus and compared it to the pathway in other insect taxa. Although the five major JH homologs described in insects have structural differences, they seem to be synthesized through a similar biosynthetic pathway, which includes 13 enzymatic steps18. Changes in substrate specificity are responsible for some of the structural differences among JHs. The presence of ethyl substitutions in the Lepidopteran’s JH I and JH II are the result of modifications in the mevalonate pathway, where the thiolase can incorporate the six-carbon building blocks homo-isopentenyl diphosphate and homo-dimethylallyl diphosphate to generate 17 and 18 carbons JHs19,20. The enzymes of the MVAP are well conserved in eukaryotes. As previously described in other insects21, in R. prolixus each of the MVAP enzymes are encoded by a single gene. There is less conservation in the late steps of the pathway13. The three enzymes involved in the conversion of FPP to FA are often encoded by families of homolog genes with broad substrate specificity and expression in a wide number of tissues16,22,23. In R. prolixus we also found several FOLD forms, the homolog depicted in Fig. 4 was expressed in the CA, but confirmation of its role in JH synthesis will require additional studies.
CYP15A124, the cytochrome P450 that catalyzes epoxidation of methyl farnesoate (MF) into JH is also well conserved in insects25. Lepidoptera have a CYP15A1 that preferentially converts farnesoic acid (FA) into juvenile hormone acid (JHA), rather than transforming MF into JH26, therefore epoxidation precedes methylation. In most other insects there is no epoxidation of FA, but instead an esterification of FA to form MF, followed by epoxidation to JH. Diptera of the suborder Brachycera, such as Drosophila melanogaster, synthesize the double-epoxidated JHB38. This “second” epoxidation seems to be a derived trait, and fruit-flies lack a clear ortholog of CYP15A124. Helvig et al.24 proposed that the CYP15 of higher flies evolved to allow the epoxidation at both the 6, 7 and 10, 11 double bonds, and this evolution resulted in such significant changes that the sequence is no longer recognizable as a CYP15. On the other hand, R. prolixus have a typical CYP15A1 epoxidase with very high CA-specific expression. To make JHSB3, kissing-bugs should epoxidate the 2, 3 and 10, 11 double bonds. It would be difficult for a single enzyme to catalyze the formation of the first epoxide group correctly on one of the double bonds of MF, and then move the partially epoxidated product in order to catalyze the second epoxidation; nevertheless to elucidate if Heteroptera have two different epoxidases to generate the 2 distinct epoxide rings will require further investigation.
The analysis of the levels and patterns of expression of the enzymes revealed similarities with previous studies in mosquitoes27, silkworm28,29, cockroaches30 and locusts31. In all these species, there were highly significant differences in the expression of the genes encoding the different enzymes, with JHAMT and epoxidase as the most highly expressed genes. In addition, in all these studies, there were significant changes in levels of expression during the life cycles, with increases in the mRNA titer for most enzymes often correlating well with increases in JH synthesis or titer. These two general trends were also observed in our studies in R. prolixus, with high mRNA levels of JHAMT and epoxidase overlapping with the major peak of JH titer.
The major peaks of JH and 20E titer overlap during the molting cycle of 4th instar R. prolixus
The molting cycle in R. prolixus is initiated by a blood meal, which through the actions of different brain factors, stimulates the synthesis and release of JH and ecdysone32–35. The only previous measurements of JH hemolymph titer in R. prolixus were performed using a radioimmunoassay (RIA)33. It described the presence of two hormonal peaks in 4th instar nymphs; a smaller JH peak on day 1 after a blood meal and a second larger JH peak on day 7. While we only detected JHSB3, this previous study described the presence of JH I, JH II and JH III (the existence of JHSB3 was not known at that time). The identification of these three JH homologs was only based on immuno-reactivities against distinct antibodies. However, the specificity of the different JH-generated RIA antibodies show considerable cross-reactivity among different JHs36. It is therefore likely that the JH’s detected in the 1978 Baehr study were actually JHSB333. The second larger peak on day 7 overlapped with the major rise in ecdysteroid titer33–35, which induces the molt to 5th instar. Similar to previous work, we also detected a 2-peak JH profile, with a significant increase in JH titer by day 2 after blood feeding, followed by a major peak of JH around day 6–7.
Wigglesworth demonstrated that removal of the head of 4th instar nymphs up to 4 days after a blood meal prevented molting. This period of ecdysone synthesis and secretion before becoming independent of the brain is called the ‘head critical period’ (HCP), and it is related to the synthesis of prothoracicotropic hormone (PTTH) by the brain37, which stimulates ecdysone synthesis38. There is also a “juvenile hormone-sensitive period” for metamorphosis. Removal of the head during this time causes premature metamorphosis1. This precocious metamorphosis is caused by interruption of JH signaling39. RNAi-mediated knockdown of the JH receptor Methoprene-tolerant (Met) in 4th instar R. prolixus showed phenotypic alterations characteristic of precocious metamorphosis40. The timing of the major peak of CA activity around 6–8 day after a blood meal, has been also suggested by studies performing allatectomies1,2,32 or chemically obliterating the CA using precocene, an anti-juvenile hormone compound, which acts directly on the CA of sensitive insects to cause anti-JH effects through necrosis of the glands41. Treating 4th instar R. prolixus34 or Triatoma infestans42 with precocene caused precocious metamorphosis only if applied early before day 4–5, suggesting again that the major peak of JH was present later during the molting cycle. The changes in JH titer that we observed in the present studies correspond well with the timing of some of the critical events previously described during the molting cycle of the 4th instar nymphs of R. prolixus (Fig. 5); including the HCP and the “JH-sensitive period”. The second JH peak overlaps with the major peak of 20-hydroxyecdysone and the detachment of the epidermal cell from the cuticle (apolysis)43, which precedes the synthesis and deposition of the new nymphal cuticle, and the ecdysis to the 5th nymphal instar.
Conclusions
The extensive studies of Wigglesworth using R. prolixus as a model, which started in the early 1930s and extended for over 40 years, established the existence and major roles of JH in insects. In the present studies, we finally report that the “inhibitory hormone” present in the “kissing-bug” is JHSB3. In addition, we described the changes in hemolymph titer of JHSB3 in 4th instar nymphs, as well as provided information on the expression of the JH-biosynthetic enzymes. These studies are laying the foundation for additional research to further understand the roles of JH on R. prolixus development and reproduction.
Methods
Insects
R. prolixus were reared at 30 ± 2 °C, with 30% relative humidity and a 12:12 h light-dark period. Newly eclosed 4th instar nymphs were starved during 15 days before offering a blood meal.
Hemolymph collection
Hemolymph (2 µl from unfed and 4 µl from fed insects) was obtained from nymphs by cutting the legs and pressing gently the abdomen. Clean drops of hemolymph were collected with capillary tubes. For each data point, at least four independent samples of 60 µl of hemolymph were collected from pools of 15 insects each for fed nymphs and a pool of 20 insects for the unfed point. Hemolymph was collected in salinized tubes containing 50 µl of anticoagulant solution (PBS with 10 mM EDTA, 26 mM sodium citrate, 26 mM citric acid and 100 mM glucose). Tubes were kept on ice. The JHD3 internal standard was added immediately after hemolymph collection and before hexane extraction.
JHSB3 identification and quantification
The JHSB3 amounts present in the hemolymph were quantified using a deuterated JH III analog (JH III-D3) as an internal standard to normalize recoveries during the sample preparation, extraction and analysis steps13. Certified standard solutions for the JH homologs and JH III-D3 were obtained from Toronto Research Chemicals (Toronto, Canada). After hemolymph extraction, 10 µL of 6.25 ppb of JH III-D3 in acetonitrile were added to each sample, followed by 600 µL of hexane13.
Samples were vortexed for 1 minute, and spun for 5 minutes at 4 °C and 2000 g. The organic phase was transferred to a new silanized vial, dried under nitrogen flow, and stored at −20 °C. Dried extracts were re-suspended in 50 µl of acetonitrile, vortexed 1 minute, transferred to a new silanized vial with a fused 250 µL insert13. JH homolog screening was performed using a liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry protocol, as previously described by Ramirez et al.13. Briefly, 35 µL of water were added to the 50 µL acetonitrile extracts. Injections (70 µL) and liquid chromatography (LC) separations were performed by an Advance UHPLC system (Bruker Daltonics Inc, Billerica, MA, USA), equipped with an Xbridge BEH Phenyl Column (4.6 mm × 150 mm, 3.5 µm) protected by a VanGuard cartridge 3.9 mm × 5 mm, 3.5 µm) (Waters, MA, USA). Column temperature was kept at 30 °C. Gradient separation was performed between 0.1% formic acid in water (mobile phase A) and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (mobile phase B) according to the following program: hold 10% B for 0.25 min, increase to 25% B in 3.75 min, increase to 99% B in 4.00 min and hold for another 4.00 min, return to 10% B in 0.50 min and hold for 2.5 min for a total run time of 15 min13. Flow rate was also changed according to the following program: hold 0.8 mL/min for 10.50 min, increase to 1.25 mL/min in 0.20 min and hold for another 1.8 min, decrease to 1 mL/min in 0.10 min and decrease to 0.80 mL/min in 2.4 min. Under these conditions, retention times were 8.9 min and 9.4 min for JHSB3 and JH III-D3, respectively13.
Detection was performed by a Bruker EvoQ LC-TQ Elite triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics Inc.) equipped with a heated electrospray ionization (HESI) interface. The instrument was operated under positive mode ionization with multiple reaction monitoring (MRM)13. Optimization of MRM collision induced dissociation (CID) energies were performed by infusing 5 mg/L solutions of single JH homologs in 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile. Heated electrospray ionization (HESI) source parameters were optimized with multiple LC-MS/MS runs using final gradient and flow rate conditions13. Source parameters were: Spray voltage 4500 V; Cone temperature: 350 °C; cone gas flow: 20 (arbitrary); Heated probe temperature: 350 °C; probe gas flow: 30 (arbitrary); nebulizer flow: 30 (arbitrary)13.
The identification of JHSB3 (based on LC-MS/MS of four channels, Fig. 1) was validated using ultra-high resolution mass spectrometry to obtain accurate masses (<1 ppm mass error) of the parent and fragment ions (Supporting Table S2). Ultra-high resolution FT-ICR MS/MS measurements were performed on a 7T Solarix FT-ICR MS instrument (Bruker Daltonics Inc) in positive ion mode; an electrospray ion source was utilized and mass spectra were collected by co-adding 20, 4 Megaword transients and processed using a half-sine apodization followed by fast-Fourier transform13.
Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)
For the study of the developmental changes in mRNA levels for the JH biosynthetic enzymes, groups of 15 corpora allata-corpora cardiaca complexes (CA-CC) were dissected in triplicate each day during the molting cycle. For the tissue-specificity studies, groups of 3 pair of ovaries, 3 fat bodies and 10 CA-CC were dissected in triplicate from females 8 day after a blood-meal. Total RNA was extracted using the Norgen Biotek total RNA purification kit (Norgen Biotek, Thorold, ON, Canada). Reverse transcription was carried out using the Verso cDNA kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Real-time PCR was performed with a 7300 Real Time PCR System using Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific). PCR reactions were run in triplicate using 1 µl of cDNA per reaction in a 20 µl volume44. Transcript levels were normalized with rpL32 transcript levels in the same sample. Each RT-PCR data point is average of 3 independent biological replicates. The primer sequences and accession numbers for the housekeeping gene 60S ribosomal protein L32 and for the different enzyme genes are included in Supplemental Table S345.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism Software 3.03 (San Diego, CA, USA). The results are expressed as means ± SEM. Significant differences (P ≥ 0.05) were determined with a one tailed students t-test performed in a pair wise manner or by one-way ANOVA followed by Fisher’s LSD test44.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Fulbright Commission and the Ministry of Education and Sports of the Argentinian Republic Research Fellowship (2017–2018) to MJVS. This research was also supports by the National Institutes of Health USA, grants R01AI045545 to F.G.N and R21AI135469 to FFL, as well as by the Universidad Nacional de La Plata (N/813). We thanks Dr. Mark E. Clifton for his critical comments.
Author contributions
M.J.V.-S., M.N., J.R.R. and F.G.N. designed the experiments. M.J.V.-S., M.N., J.R.R., M.E.A., C.E.R., F.F.-L. and F.G.N. performed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Jorge Rafael Ronderos, Email: jronderos@fcnym.unlp.edu.ar.
Fernando G. Noriega, Email: noriegaf@fiu.edu
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-59495-1.
References
- 1.Wigglesworth VB. The physiology of ecdysis in Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera). II. Factors controlling moulting and ‘metamorphosis’. Q. J. Microscopical Science. 1934;77:191–222. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wigglesworth VB. The function of the corpus allatum in the growth and reproduction of Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera) Q. J. Microscopical Science. 1936;79:91–121. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wigglesworth VB. The determination of characters at metamorphosis in Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera) J. Experim. Biol. 1940;17:201–223. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wigglesworth VB. The functions of the corpus allatum in Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera) J. Experim. Biol. 1948;25:1–14. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Röller H, Dahms KH, Sweely CC, Trost BM. The structure of the juvenile hormone. Angew. Chem. Int. Edition. 1967;6:1966–1967. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Meyer AS, Schneiderman HA, Hanzmann E, Ko JH. The two juvenile hormones from the Cecropia silk moth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1968;60:853–860. doi: 10.1073/pnas.60.3.853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Judy KJ, et al. Isolation, structure, and absolute configuration of a new natural insect juvenile hormone from Manduca sexta. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1973;70:1509–1513. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.5.1509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Richard DS, et al. Juvenile hormone bisepoxide biosynthesis in vitro by the ring gland of Drosophila melanogaster: a putative juvenile hormone in the higher Diptera. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1989;86:1421–1425. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.4.1421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kotaki T, Shinada T, Kaihara K, Ohfune Y, Numata H. Structure determination of a new juvenile hormone from a Heteropteran insect. Org. Letters. 2009;11:5234–5237. doi: 10.1021/ol902161x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kotaki T, Shinada T, Kaihara K, Ohfune Y, Numata H. Biological activities of juvenile hormone III skipped bisepoxide in last instar nymphs and adults of a stink bug, Plautia stali. J. Insect Physiol. 2011;57:147–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rivera-Perez, C., Nouzova, M. & Noriega, F. G. New approaches to study juvenile hormone biosynthesis in insects. In: Short views on insect biochemistry and molecular biology. Chapter 7, 185–216 (2014).
- 12.Ramirez CE, et al. Fast, ultra-trace detection of juvenile hormone III from mosquitoes using mass spectrometry. Talanta. 2016;159:371–378. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.06.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ramirez CE, et al. Common structural features facilitate the simultaneous identification and quantification of the five most common juvenile hormones by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Insect Biochem. Molec. Biol. 2020;116:103287. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2019.103287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hejnikova M, Paroulek M, Hodkova M. Decrease in Methoprene tolerant and Taiman expression reduces juvenile hormone effect and enhances the levels of juvenile hormone circulating in males of the linden bug Pyrrhocoris apterus. J. Insect Physiol. 2016;93–94:72–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2016.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mesquita RD, et al. The genome of Rhodnius prolixus, an insect vector of Chagas disease, reveals unique adaptations to hematophagy and parasite infection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:14936–14941. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1506226112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mayoral JG, Nouzova M, Navare A, Noriega FG. NADP+-dependent farnesol dehydrogenase, a corpora allata enzyme involved in juvenile hormone synthesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:21091–21096. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909938106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schuh RT, Weirauch C, Wheeler WC. Phylogenetic relationships within the Cimicomorpha (Hemiptera: Heteroptera): a total-evidence analysis. Syst. Entomol. 2009;34:15–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2008.00436.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rivera-Pérez, C., Clifton, M. E., Noriega, F. G. & Jindra, M. Juvenile hormone regulation and action. Advances in Invertebrate (Neuro) Endocrinology. Apple Academic Press, Inc., Oakville, Canada. Editors: Saber Saleuddin, Angela, B. Lange, Ian, Orchard. Vol. 2, 1–76 (2020).
- 19.Schooley DA, Judy KJ, Bergot BJ, Hall MS, Siddall JB. Biosynthesis of the juvenile hormones of Manduca sexta: labeling pattern from mevalonate, propionate, and acetate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1973;70:2921–2925. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.10.2921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Eiben, C. B. et al. Mevalonate pathway promiscuity enables noncanonical terpene production. ACS Synth. Biol. In press (2019). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 21.Noriega Fernando G. Juvenile Hormone Biosynthesis in Insects: What Is New, What Do We Know, and What Questions Remain? International Scholarly Research Notices. 2014;2014:1–16. doi: 10.1155/2014/967361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nyati P, et al. Farnesyl phosphatase, a corpora allata enzyme involved in juvenile hormone synthesis in Aedes aegypti. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(8):e71967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rivera-Perez C, et al. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 3 converts farnesal into farnesoic acid in the corpora allata of mosquitoes. Insect Biochem. Molec. Biol. 2013;43:675–682. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2013.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Helvig C, Koener JF, Unnithan GC, Feyereisen R. CYP15A1, the cytochrome P450 that catalyzes epoxidation of methyl farnesoate to juvenile hormone III in cockroach corpora allata. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:4024–4029. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0306980101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Daimon T, Shinoda T. Function, diversity, and application of insect juvenile hormone epoxidases (CYP15) Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2013;60:82–91. doi: 10.1002/bab.1058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Daimon T, et al. Precocious metamorphosis in the juvenile hormone-deficient mutant of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(3):e1002486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nouzova M, Edwards MJ, Mayoral JG, Noriega FG. A coordinated expression of biosynthetic enzyme controls the flux of juvenile hormone precursors in the corpora allata of mosquitoes. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2011;41:660–669. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2011.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kinjoh T, et al. Control of juvenile hormone biosynthesis in Bombyx mori: Cloning of the enzymes in the mevalonate pathway and assessment of their developmental expression in the corpora allata. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007;37:807–818. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2007.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ueda H, Shinoda T, Hiruma K. Spatial expression of the mevalonate enzymes involved in juvenile hormone biosynthesis in the corpora allata in Bombyx mori. J. Insect Physiol. 2009;55:798–804. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2009.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Huang J, Marchal E, Hult EF, Tobe SS. Characterization of the juvenile hormone pathway in the viviparous cockroach, Diploptera punctata. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0117291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Marchal E, et al. Final steps in juvenile hormone biosynthesis in the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2011;41:219–227. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2010.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wigglesworth VB. Hormone balance and the control of metamorphosis in Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera) J. exp. Biol. 1952;29:620–631. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Baehr JC, Porcheron P, Dray F. Dosages radio-immunologiques des hormones juveniles au tours des deux derniers stades larvaires de Rhodnius prolixus. C. R. H. S. Acad. Sci., Paris. 1978;281:523–526. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Garcia ES, Uhl M, Rembold H. Azadirachtin, a chemical probe for the study of moulting processes in Rhodnius prolixus. Z. Naturforsch. 1986;41:771–775. doi: 10.1515/znc-1986-7-817. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Garcia ES, Furtado AF, De Azambuja P. Effect of allatectomy on ecdysteroid-dependent development of Rhodnius prolixus larvae. J. Insect Physiol. 1987;33:729–732. doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(87)90058-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tobe SS, Stay B. Structure and regulation of the corpus allatum. Adv. Insect Physiol. 1985;18:305–431. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2806(08)60043-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Marchal E, et al. Control of ecdysteroidogenesis in prothoracic glands of insects: A review. Peptides. 2010;31:506–519. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2009.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ou Q, et al. The insect prothoracic gland as a model for steroid hormone biosynthesis and regulation. Cell Rep. 2016;16:247–262. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jindra, M. Where did the pupa come from? The timing of juvenile hormone signaling supports homology between stages of hemimetabolous and holometabolous insects. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 374, 20190064 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 40.Villalobos Sambucaro MJ, et al. Genomic and functional characterization of a methoprene-tolerant gene in the kissing-bug Rhodnius prolixus. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2015;216:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2015.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bowers WS, Ohta T, Cleere JS, Marsella PA. Discovery of insect anti-juvenile hormone in plants. Sci. 1976;193:542–541. doi: 10.1126/science.986685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ronderos JR. Changes in the corpora allata and epidermal proliferation along the fourth instar of the Chagas disease vector Triatoma infestans. Bio. Cell. 2009;33:149–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wigglesworth VB. The significance of “apolysis” in the moulting of insects. Physiological. Entomol. 1973;47:115–209. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Nouzova M, Michalkova V, Ramirez CE, Fernandez-Lima F, Noriega FG. Inhibition of juvenile hormone synthesis in mosquitoes by the methylation inhibitor 3-deazaneplanocin A (DZNep) Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019;113:103183. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2019.103183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Giraldo-Calderón Gloria I., Emrich Scott J., MacCallum Robert M., Maslen Gareth, Dialynas Emmanuel, Topalis Pantelis, Ho Nicholas, Gesing Sandra, Madey Gregory, Collins Frank H., Lawson Daniel. VectorBase: an updated bioinformatics resource for invertebrate vectors and other organisms related with human diseases. Nucleic Acids Research. 2014;43(D1):D707–D713. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).