Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Feb 20;10:3096. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59698-6

An investigation of the long-range and local structure of sub-stoichiometric zirconium carbide sintered at different temperatures

Dhan-sham B K Rana 1,, Eugenio Zapatas Solvas 2, William E Lee 2, Ian Farnan 1
PMCID: PMC7033217  PMID: 32080236

Abstract

ZrC1−x (sub-stoichiometric zirconium carbide), a group IV transition metal carbide, is being considered for various high temperature applications. Departure from stoichiometry changes the thermo-physical response of the material. Reported thermo-physical properties exhibit, in some cases, a degree of scatter with one likely contributor to this being the uncertainty in the C/Zr ratio of the samples produced. Conventional, methods for assigning C/Zr to samples are determined either by nominal stochiometric ratios or combustion carbon analysis. In this study, a range of stoichiometries of hot-pressed ZrC1−x were examined by SEM, XRD, Raman spectroscopy and static 13C NMR spectroscopy and used as a basis to correct the C/Zr. Graphite, amorphous, and ZrC1−x carbon signatures are observed in the 13C NMR spectra of samples and are determined to vary in intensity with sintering temperature and stoichiometry. In this study a method is outlined to quantify the stoichiometry of ZrC1−x and free carbon phases, providing an improvement over the sole use and reliance of widely adopted bulk carbon combustion analysis. We report significantly lower C/Zr values determined by 13C NMR analysis compared with carbon analyser and nominal methods. Furthermore, the location of carbon disassociated from the ZrC1−x structure is analysed using SEM and Raman spectroscopy.

Subject terms: Ceramics, Mechanical properties, Materials science

Introduction

ZrC1−x (sub-stoichiometric zirconium carbide), is under consideration for its use in generation IV nuclear fuel coatings due to its favourable mechanical, thermal, neutronic, and fission product retention properties14. This combination of characteristics is derived from the combination of its metallic electronic properties and its ceramic properties5.

ZrC crystallises in the rocksalt structure with carbon atoms located in the octahedral interstitial sites. When carbon is removed from the ZrC structure, significant changes are seen in the physical and thermal properties. Scatter in reported data exists in the variation of the physical properties with the atomic C/Zr ratio. The scatter in the data potentially arises due to the combination of two factors: inaccurate composition measurements (C/Zr ratio) resulting in misreferenced physical properties; and the contribution of interstitial impurities such as oxygen and nitrogen leading to a range values for several themo-physical properties.

Non-monotonic trends in material properties have been observed for physical properties, such as the lattice parameter. Assuming the sub-stochiometric material is comprised exclusively of ZrC and no contaminant species the configuration ordering of carbon atoms as the concentration of vacancies increases may be a contributing factor to the occurrence of these non-monotonic trends. As understanding of how these vacancies interact and how this affects material properties is crucial to evaluating the suitability of ZrC1−x for nuclear materials. Fundamentally, correct determination of the carbon content of sub-stoichiometric ZrC1−x is vital in order to accurately reference the properties of ZrC1−x to its stoichiometry.

Numerous fabrication routes exist for producing solid ZrC1−x samples611. However, reactive hot-pressing is commonly used as a technique for creating samples near theoretical density1215. The vast majority of experimental studies quote nominal12,1618 and combustion carbon analysis6,1924 values for carbon content, with this being used as a reference point for the attribution of material thermo-mechanical property values. Little previous work has been undertaken to evaluate the accuracy of standard carbon content characterisation techniques. This study proposes alternative characterisation methods that can provide quantitative corrections and examines how distributions of carbon atoms vary with sintering temperature and stoichiometry and explores the accuracy of commonly used carbon analysis techniques using static solid state 13C NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance).

Experimental Methods

Fabrication method

Samples with nominal stoichiometries were fabricated under a vacuum atmosphere by reactively hot-pressing (FCT Systeme GmbH, Germany) mixtures of precursor powders; ZrH2 (453330317, 2.4 μm, Rockwood Lithium GmbH, Germany) and graphite powder (282863, <20 μm, synthetic, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) according to the reaction (1) below.

ZrH2+CZrC+H2 1

The reactant powders were mixed to the desired stoichiometric ratio under inert argon gas glove-box conditions. These powders were then dry milled in nylon jars with ZrO2 balls (~1.0 cm in diameter) in a Retsch PM100 planetary miller (Resch, Han, Germany) for; 30 minutes at 150 rpm with milling direction reversal occurring for 5 minute periods in order to produce homogenous mixtures.

The milled base powders (see Supplementary Table T1) were loaded into graphite dies (3.5 cm diameter) and separated from the die surface and each other by layers of commercial grade grafoil (Erodex (UK) Ltd, UK) (0.05 cm in thickness). They were heated at a rate of 10 °C/min to 1400 °C with a contact load of 5 kN; held at 1400 °C for 60 minutes at a contact load of 21.3 kN; heated to the desired sintering temperatures (2000 °C, 1700 °C, 1500 °C) at a rate of 10 °C/min under a contact load of 30 kN and held at these temperatures for 1 hour. The contact load was then reduced to 5 kN, the heaters were turned off allowing the samples to cool to ambient temperature. The nominal stoichiometries produced are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Nominal and carbon analysed values for ZrC1x samples with the error on the carbon analyser calculated from the standard deviation of triplicate measurements.

Sintering temperature (°C) Nominal C/Zr analysed carbon content ± error
2000 1.00 1.00 ± 0.01
0.80 0.85 ± 0.00
0.60 0.64 ± 0.00
1700 1.00 0.96 ± 0.00
0.80 0.73 ± 0.01
0.60 0.64 ± 0.00
1500 0.95 0.95 ± 0.01
0.70 0.73 ± 0.01
0.65 0.64 ± 0.00

Post-sintering, approximately 0.25 cm of each sample pellet was removed radially and axially (both faces) of the pellet with a circular grinder. This ensured, that any excess, graphite that could affect carbon measurements was removed. The pellets were cleaned using high purity ethanol. Blocks measuring 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm and 200 μm in thickness were cut from the sintered pellets using a wire electrical discharge machine. In order to examine the microstructure using SEM (scanning electron microscopy), the samples sintered at 2000 were polished to a mirror finish using diamond polishing paste of decreasing particulate size with the final step being 0.2 μm.

A proportion of each dense pellet was reduced to a fine powder by hand. The pellet was broken up using a stainless-steel punch and hammer on a clean foil coated anvil and the particle-size was reduced using an agate mortar and pestle. The semi-metallic nature of ZrC1x; means it possesses a skin depth that attenuates the RF (radio frequencies) used in NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) spectroscopy. Thus, it was necessary to reduce the particle diameter below the skin depth to allow for total signal penetration. A skin depth of ~34 µm was calculated from correlations in the literature1,2,25. To achieve this diameter, the powdered samples were further dry milled, sieved to less than ~25 µm. The powdered samples were further screened for any magnetic particles that may have arisen from the preparation apparatus using a very high magnetic field.

Carbon analysis

The total carbon content of the sample was measured using a HORIBA EMIA-320 V2 Carbon and Sulphur chemical analyser. The carbon analyser uses a furnace to combust the samples; a process that results in carbon dioxide gas being emitted from the sample. The amount of carbon dioxide produced is measured by calibrated infrared detectors yielding the total carbon content of the sample.

Oxygen and nitrogen were used as the carrier and operating gases in the analyser, respectively. Aluminium oxide (50–70%) and silica (30–50%) ceramic crucibles, previously heated to 1000 °C for 30 minutes in a muffle furnace to remove any carbon impurities and then stored in a desiccator, were used to contain the samples in the analyser furnace chamber. Prior to running samples, the analyser was calibrated. Quantification of carbon present in a batch of crucibles and the accelerant powers (copper and iron pellets purchased from HORIBA - used to elevate combustion temperatures) was undertaken by running three crucibles and three crucibles containing accelerant. Powdered tungsten carbide standard of known total carbon content (HORIBA 30 mg-BSC–CRM No. 352/1 from The Bureau of Analysed Samples, UK) was used to calibrate the analyser. For a given sample run including the tungsten calibration run an empty crucible was removed from the desiccator using tongs and placed on a Mettler Toledo measurement scale connected to a computer. A small amount of powdered sample (~1.00 g) was placed in the crucible using a spatula, the sample mass was recorded in the HORIBA analyser software. The sample was placed in the furnace and the analyser routine was activated–outputting mass percent of the carbon in the analyser. Triplicate measurements were undertaken for each sample to provide a basis for error quantification.

13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Static, room temperature, 13C NMR was undertaken on all samples to investigate carbon local environments in the sample, providing the basis for distinguishing different carbon sites and quantitatively determine their relative abundance. Static NMR was used as spinning semi-metallic samples, such as ZrC, is difficult due to the opposing Lorentz force generated by turning a conductor in a magnetic field. In addition, preliminary spinning experiments at 20 kHz in a 3.2 mm rotor showed no spectral narrowing compared with a static sample–hence, static NMR was used for all experiments in this study. Static room temperature 13C NMR spectroscopy was performed on a Varian Infinity spectrometer operating at a frequency of 100.603 MHz, for 13C with a 9.39 T magnet. To minimise signal contributions from NMR rotor components, the crushed samples were loaded into 7.5 mm zirconia rotors with aluminium nitride spacers (replacing standard carbon containing polymeric spacers). The Hahn echo technique was employed to obtain spectra, using the sequence: π/2 (4.70 μs), delay (30.00 μs), π (9.40 μs), each acquisition was separated by a pulse delay (9.00 s), which was determined to be the saturating condition by variable delay experiments. Around 10,000 echoes were averaged, and Fourier transformed from the echo top; with a Lorentzian line broadening of 200 Hz being applied before transformation. The precursor graphite powder spectrum was collected using a single pulse sequence with a pulse delay of 0.10 s. All NMR spectra were referenced to tetramethylsilane (TMS), via a secondary reference to solid adamantane (38.52 ppm26) which was acquired using a single π/2 pulse followed by a pulse delay (1.00 s).

As the carbon nuclei are being directly observed via NMR, the integral of a peak in the spectrum corresponds to the number of carbon atoms present in that unique chemical environment. The analysis of the contribution of different carbon atoms to each sample spectrum was carried out using a non-linear least square fitting routine (IgorPro) with Gaussian, Lorentzian and Voigt peak profiles. The proportion of carbon atoms in ZrC1x sites was found by taking the ratio of the peak value with respect to the total peak area. This can be used to correct the value of the carbon content of the ZrC1−x by assigning the spectral fractional integral of the ZrC1−x peak as the corresponding fraction of the total carbon content given by the carbon analyser.

XRD (x-ray diffraction)

Powder X-ray diffraction was conducted on a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer in a Bragg-Brentano configuration using Cu Kα1 radiation. A standard reference of silicon was mixed into the powdered sample. A single crystal silicon zero-background sample holder was used and the X-ray diffractogram was collected from 20° to 105° 2θ at room temperature with the – step interval being 0.015°. XRD was used to confirm the rock-salt structure1,2,17,27 of ZrC1−x, to determine if any other phases were present in the sample15,28,29 and, using Rietveld refinement in the TOPAZ academic software suite, to determine the lattice parameter and the associated error.

SEM

SEM was conducted on the 2000 °C samples to investigate the microstructure and more specifically how the carbon content affects the grain size. A Quanta-6F0F SEM was used to collect BSE and SE (backscattered and secondary electron) images using Everhart Thornley and Circular Backscatter Detectors, respectively. Solid pellet samples were mounted onto aluminium stubs using double sided carbon tape. Samples were imaged at a working distance of 13 mm using SE and BSE detectors with an accelerating voltage of 5 kV in high vacuum. Chemical analysis of different regions in the images were probed by energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX) using a Bruker 6130 XFlash and analysed using the ESPIRIT software. EBSD maps were collected on the sample to quantify the grain size, using an accelerating voltage of 25 kV. EBSD setup *stub containing the sample was mounted onto a stage orientated at 70°.

Raman spectroscopy

Raman spectroscopy was conducted on solid ZrC1x samples to investigate the presence of different allotropes of carbon in the sample and their morphology30. Sections of the sintered pellets, 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm, were introduced into a Horiba Jobin Yvon confocal LabRam300 Raman spectrometer with green laser wavelength of 532 nm at 90 mW. An x50 Olympus objective lens with 1000 µm confocal aperture and a holographic grating of 1800 slits per mm was used and the spectrometer was calibrated using a silicon wafer which has a characteristic Raman line at 520 cm−1. Raman spectra were obtained from different regions of the sample b adjusting the location of the focal point of the spectrometer with an in-axis optical microscope.

Results

Carbon analyser results

Table 1 presents the results of total carbon analysis of sintered ZrC1x pellets and the nominal content defined by the stoichiometry of the initial mixed powders. Carbon analysis values correspond to the total carbon content determined by the carbon analyser.

Most samples show a higher analysed carbon content as compared with nominal values, with a third of the samples showing a lower analysed carbon–two of these samples belong to the set of samples sintered at 1700 °C. The total carbon content of the lower stoichiometries across all sintering temperatures were shown to have similar values. The total carbon content the samples sintered at 1500 °C and 1700 °C being above and below nominal stoichiometry. Samples sintered at 1700 °C and 1500 °C also show a larger deviation from nominal stoichiometry at intermediate stoichiometries.

13C NMR

Figure 1 (a) shows the 13C NMR spectrum of nominal C/Zr = 0.60 sintered at 2000 °C offset, and plotted on the same axis, Fig. 1(b) shows the spectrum of the graphite precursor powder.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) 13C NMR spectrum of ZrC1x, nominal C/Zr = 0.60, sintered at 2000 °C (b) spectrum of precursor graphite located at ~113 ppm.

The location of the peak arising from graphite is located ~113 ppm31, its presence can be seen in a typical ZrC1x sample spectrum clearly showing the presence of graphite within the sample.

Figure 2 shows the static 13C NMR spectra for all samples fabricated grouped by sintering temperature and plotted on a normalised scale. The ZrC1x resonance peak of the samples sintered at 2000 °C (Fig. 2a) shifts from higher to lower ppm with increasing carbon content. The CG (peak centre of gravity) of the ZrC1−x peak varies from 434 to 404 ppm corresponding to a peak shift of ~30 ppm. The 1700 °C sintered samples (Fig. 2b) show a contrasting trend to the 2000 °C sintered samples with the centre of gravity of the peak varying from the lower to higher ppm with increasing carbon content. Quantitatively, this corresponds to a ZrC1−x peak shift change of ~23 ppm varying from 411 ppm to 434 ppm. The samples sintered at 1500 °C (Fig. 2c) indicate that the main ZrC1−x peak present in nominal C/Zr = 0.65 and 0.70 samples, labelled α, appears to evolve into the peak, labelled, β as carbon content increases to a nominal C/Zr = 0.95, which also appears as a shoulder in the spectra of the nominal 0.70 and 0.65 signals. For the 1500 °C samples, the intensity of the graphite-like signal increases with increasing carbon content (Table 2). In addition to the ‘sharp’ peak at 113 ppm there is also evidence for an additional peak at ~120–300 ppm, and therefore an additional carbon local environment in these 13C NMR spectra, especially in the samples sintered at 1700 °C. Figure 3 (bottom) shows a representative 13C NMR spectrum for samples of ZrC1−x the blue tracer line indicates the peak fits based on symmetric ZrC1x and graphite resonances.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

13C NMR spectra with normalised peak intensities for different stoichiometries sintered at (a) 2000 °C, (b) 1700 °C, (c) 1500 °C. Red, black and blue spectrum traces correspond to nominal C/Zr = 1.00, 0.80, 0.60 for 2000 °C and 1700 °C - C/Zr = 0.95, 0.70, 0.65 for 1500 °C; α and β denote resolved peaks in the 1500 °C spectra.

Table 2.

Compilation of the analysed and NMR corrected carbon content errors on the NMR fit are propagated through from errors on the peak fits and the error (±1σ) on the carbon analyser is taken from the triplicate measurements.

Sintering temperature (°C) Nominal C/Zr Analysed C/Zr ± error Corrected C/Zr from NMR ± error Corrected Graphite content from NMR ± error Corrected broad carbon content from NMR ± error
2000 1.00 1.00 ± 0.01 0.95 ± 0.01 0.03 ± 0.01 0.03 ± 0.03
0.80 0.85 ± 0.00* 0.75 ± 0.01 0.03 ± 0.01 0.07 ± 0.01
0.60 0.64 ± 0.00* 0.50 ± 0.00* 0.04 ± 0.00* 0.09 ± 0.01
1700 1.00 0.96 ± 0.00* 0.81 ± 0.00* 0.07 ± 0.00* 0.17 ± 0.03
0.80 0.73 ± 0.01 0.56 ± 0.01 0.09 ± 0.01 0.03 ± 0.01
0.60 0.64 ± 0.00* 0.50 ± 0.00* 0.05 ± 0.00* 0.08 ± 0.01
1500 0.90 0.95 ± 0.01 0.88 ± 0.02 0.06 ± 0.02 0.01 ± 0.11
0.70 0.73 ± 0.01 0.69 ± 0.01 0.03 ± 0.01 0.01 ± 0.22
0.65 0.64 ± 0.00* 0.60 ± 0.01 0.00* ± 0.00* 0.04 ± 0.13

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Deconvolution of the 13C NMR peaks in a sample sintered at 1700 °C with nominal C/Zr 0.80. The bottom spectrum shows the Gaussian peak fitted to the ZrC1x carbon resonance at 419ppm (a) and a Voigt peak at 113 ppm to the resonance of graphite carbons (b). The top profile shows the residual when (a) and (b) are subtracted from the original line shape, revealing an additional resonance labelled (c).

A Voigt peak was fitted to the graphite environment as this gave the best fit. The fit was optimised using non-linear regression analysis which used the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. The Voigt peak parameter values (position, width, and Gaussian-Lorentzian fraction) determined from the graphite precursor were used to restrict the graphite peak fitting to its intensity. For the ZrC1−x resonance, the peak was fitted with asymmetric Gaussian using the shape of the high-frequency (low field) side of the peak (including ‘dummy’ Gaussians to represent the missing intensity). The additional resonance observed in the residual spectrum (labelled c) located between ~120–300 ppm is difficult to fit without constraints; as its broad structure means that any fitted peak(s) infringe on the ZrC1−x and the graphite resonances. The contribution of the broad peak to the total carbon content can be therefore quantified by subtracting the sum of the ZrC1−x and graphite signal integrals from the total resonance signal integral. Table 2 lists C/Zr values given by the carbon analyser method, and correct values determined from the peak fitting.

SEM analysis

Figure 4 shows low magnification BSE images taken of samples pf samples with different carbon contents sintered at 2000 °C. Sample surfaces reveal the presence of surface depressions appearing as crack like network structures that are present in all samples.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

BSE images of sample sintered at 2000 °C with nominal C/Zr = (a) 1.00, (b) 0.80, (c) 0.60 Square markings are reference points.

For nominal C/Zr = 1.00 the microstructure showed a significant amount of intra and intergranular features, with the latter appearing larger in size than the former. The micrographs of the nominal C/Zr = 0.80 show a preference for intergranular features which partially occupy elongated portions along the grain boundaries (Fig. 4). Samples with nominal C/Zr = 0.60 show a fully developed network of intergranular structures which distinctly trace out the grain boundaries as well as large intra granular structures. The average grain size distribution was analysed using the MTEX32 package in MATLAB and was found to be 16, 217 and 235 μm for nominal C/Zr 1.00, 0.80 and 0.60 respectively. A decrease in the average grain size is observed as the carbon content of the sample is increased33.

Figure 5 shows baseline corrected Raman spectrum of nominal C/Zr = 0.60 sintered at 2000 °C in which active modes can been seen. Two of these peaks can been attributed to sp2 carbon ~1359 cm−1 and ~1600 cm−1 termed the D and G peak3438. The activation of D breathing mode occurs as a result of the disruption in a perfect graphite structure and its presence is indicative of disorder. The G mode can be attributed C-C stretching mode of the graphite structure35,37,39,40. Finally, a broad peak is present centred ~500 cm−1 and this has been attributed previously to amorphous carbon30,41.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Baselined Raman spectrum sample sintered at 2000 °C for nominal C/Zr = 0.60 for intra and intergranular crack regions – the amorphous band is labelled a, the D band is labelled d, the G band is labelled g.

Discussion

13C NMR spectra reveal that a diverse range of unique carbon chemical environments or phases are present in all samples. One such environment that was observed was the sharp peak (~113 ppm) which is dissociated from the main ZrC1−x peak – its structure and presence is validated by the 13C NMR spectra of the graphite precursor powder. This implies that extra carbon phases are present in the sample that do not exist in the ZrC1−x structure. According to the phase diagram the homogeneous region of ZrC1−x is located between 0.55 > C/Zr > 1.001,2,4 with no extra phases present. As discussed in the methods section, a grafoil liner was used to line the dies utilised in the hot press. Although every effort was made to remove any bonded grafoil from the sample and a considerable proportion of the sample was removed from the outer faces to further limit this – there is a possibility that elevated temperatures and the presence of a carbon concentration gradient may have led to an ingress via diffusion of carbon from grafoil to the sample.

The presence of a clear resonance for ZrC1x and graphite environments are observed in the NMR spectra. However, in almost all NMR spectra this is accompanied by an additional, separate broad peak of unknown origin. It is possible that anisotropy may accompany the resonance of a carbon atom that is associated with one or more carbon vacancy in the 2nd neighbour sites. If the anisotropy were located at a low frequency, the broad carbon peak could be associated with an anisotropy of the ZrC1−x peak. Theoretically, a stochiometric C/Zr = 1.00 structure will not exhibit anisotropy because the carbon sites in a symmetric cubic rocksalt structure have a high point symmetry. In contrast, a structure with vacancies can have a distribution of unique chemical environments and different orientations of crystallites with respect to the spectrometer magnetic field. The implication is that either there is some anisotropy associated with the static ZrC1−x spectrum or an additional carbon environment is present in the sample.

Figure 6 shows the relative NMR spin-lattice relaxation behaviour of the ZrC1x, the graphite and the amorphous carbon peaks. The pulse delay for maximum signal (equilibrium signal) was found to be 9.0 s while the maximum signal for the graphite-like peak pulse delay was found to be ~3.0 s in the sample corresponding to a T1s of 1.8 and 0.6 s for the different type of carbons, respectively. The ZrC1x relaxes on a relatively long timescale whereas the saturation relaxation timescale of the broad carbon environment is more rapid. This implies that carbon atoms in the amorphous carbon exist in an environment that is chemically closer to graphite than the ZrC1−x environment. The associated relaxation behaviour also confirms that unreacted graphite, which has a very short T1, is not present in the sample. The location of the broad peak indicates that this signal is due to sp2 type carbon and is similar to that exhibited by black fullerenes and amorphous carbon structures34,35,39,40,42. Comparison of the nominal carbon content and the carbon analyser data with respect to the NMR curve fitting, reveals that the carbon content cannot be accurately determined by the first two methods.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

13C NMR the evolution of the broad structure (indicated by grey line) with respect to the pulse delay for the nominal C/Zr = 1.00 sample sintered at 1700 °C. Red, black, blue and green spectral traces correspond to pulse delays of 9.00, 3.00, 1.00 and 0.10 seconds respectively.

Computational investigations of vacancy ordering in ZrC1x, by Zhang et al.43 and Xie et al.44 identified several stable stoichiometries. Comparison of these stable stoichiometries with NMR corrected C/Zr ratios shows the coincidence of the compositions of a number of these stable phases present in the samples in this study. These are highlighted in green in Table 3.

Table 3.

Comparison of static 13C NMR evaluated NMR C/Zr as compared with stable ZyCz phases computed by Zhang et al. ()43 Xie et al. ()44. Errors too small to show denoted by *.

Experimentally determined Computationally determined Stoichiometry
Sintering temperature (°C) Nominal C/Zr Corrected C/Zr from NMR ±  error
2000 1.00 0.95 ± 0.01 Na
0.80 0.75 ± 0.01 Zr4C3
0.60 0.50 ± 0.00* Zr2C1†‡
1700 1.00 0.81 ± 0.00* Zr32C28
0.80 0.56 ± 0.01 Zr32C18
0.60 0.50 ± 0.00* Zr2C1† ‡
1500 0.95 0.88 ± 0.02 Zr8C7
0.70 0.69 ± 0.01 na
0.65 0.60 ± 0.01 na

The presence of at least two unique carbon environments within the ZrC1x resolved in the resonances of the samples sintered at 1500 °C (Fig. 2(c)) show an interesting feature which was not seen in the other samples. Figure 7 shows the results of two Gaussian functions fitted to the 1500 °C spectral resonances whose CGs are α at ~460 ppm and β at ~370 ppm. The CG of the Gaussian functions fitted to the α and β resonances appear be the maximum and minimum positions, respectively, bounding the CG of all fabricated samples.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

CG as determined from NMR spectrum peak fitting plotted with respect to NMR determined C/Zr for samples sintered at 2000 °C, 1700 °C and 1500 °C.

The location of the CGs of all samples were seen to decrease with increasing carbon content with the exception of nominal C/Zr = 1.00 sintered at 1700 °C. Overall the CG position was also seen to decrease with lower fabrication sintering temperatures apart from the 1500 °C samples due the inhomogeneity in the line shape.

For the 1500 °C samples the CG and the percentage of carbon in α and β resonances were observed to be dependent on the concentration of carbon in the sample. The percentage of carbons present in the ZrC1−x resonance for nominal C/Zr = 0.95, 0.70, 0.65 samples were respectively for the α resonance 16%, 49%, 72% and for the β resonance 84%, 51%, 28%. The systematic evolution in occupancy of the α β carbon resonance environments varies solely as a function of the carbon content. The number of carbon atoms present in the α and β resonances were seen to decrease and increase, respectively, with increasing carbon content. This indicates a preferential occupancy from the more metallic - based on paramagnetism of conduction electrons -, presumably vacancy rich α environment to the less metallic, carbon rich β environment. Structurally, in a carbon deficient stoichiometry, the carbon atoms can be thought of as adopting arrangements around a complete or filled, close-packed Zr matrix45,46. Since NMR is a local spectroscopic technique, the local magnetic field induced at a carbon atom is influenced by its first and second nearest neighbours (NN). An additional effect on the shift position in metallic or semi-metallic systems; is the local density of states at the Fermi level (at carbon) i.e., a Knight shift component. The presence of vacancies may affect both factors.

The inhomogeneity and systematic evolution in the sub-environment line-shapes seen in the ZrC1x peak of the 1500 °C sintered samples can be explored by considering vacancy ordering schemes. The NMR chemical shift is a through bond process and so near neighbours at different physical distances must be considered. Considering 108 carbon atoms in a 3 × 3 × 3 ZrC super cell, 12 carbon nearest neighbours (1NNC) are located at a distance of √2 dZrC from the central carbon atom, 6 carbons (2NNC) are located at a distance of 2dZrC, and a further 24 NNC are located at 3/2dZrC (Fig. 8). Considering arguments of vacancy avoidance, If all 24 3NNc positions are vacated, then the resulting carbon concentration would be equivalent to ZrC0.79, if the next 6 2NNC were vacated then the carbon concentration would be equivalent to ZrC0.72. The α peak was seen to emerge in the 1500 °C samples between samples with NMR corrected ZrC0.69-0.88. This is consistent with the major change in resonance position occurring when the sites vacated by carbons come from the closest distance at √2 dZrC. Thus, the emergence of the α resonance may be attributed to the change in the removal of 2nd and 3rd NNC to the 1st NNC which as result causes the line shape to shift from the β to α resonance position.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

NMR sensitive carbons shown in a typical 2 × 1 cell where the carbon and zirconium atoms are identified by the green and red atoms respectively. Examples of 1st, 2nd and 3rd NNc atoms are labelled by their corresponding numbers. An arrow is drawn from the central carbon atom outlined in black to each numbered NNc.

The presence of the homogeneous, unresolved, ZrC1−x peak structure was seen in the samples sintered at 2000 °C and 1700 °C. It is expected that hot-pressing at elevated temperatures leads to higher mobility of carbon atoms, allowing them to fill a range of interstitial sites with a stochastic rather than an ordered distribution.

The binomial model can be used to determine the random distribution of vacancies over 1st and 2nd (Fig. 9) NNC where the vacancies are statistically distributed amongst NNC sites.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Binomial models of the vacancy distributions for NMR corrected carbon contents for (a) 2000 oC and (b) 1700 oC.

Figure 9 shows the binomial distribution for the carbon environments of the different schema devised. For all models it is observed that there is a high probability of obtaining a vacancy number for a given C/Zr. The binomial distributions generated show that the various samples produced by different sintering temperatures produce different probabilities of achieving different vacant sites–which could correspond to the change in the peak position observed by the 1700 °C and 2000 °C samples.

X-ray diffraction patterns showed no deviation from the rocksalt structure in any of the samples evidencing that the structure can remain stable for large vacancy concentrations24,43. This does not match the results in theoretical studies43,44 which imply a change in symmetry from the NaCl structure with increasing vacancy concentrations. However, it is possible microstructures may form that correspond to the determined symmetry locally but are not coherent enough for diffraction. The lattice parameters as determined by this study present lower values than have been previously shown in the literature (Fig. 10) in some cases varying by as much as 0.10 Å47,48.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Lattice parameter from a selection of various studies4853 plotted with data from this study plotted against NMR corrected C/Zr.

Furthermore, earlier studies exhibit a peak in the lattice parameters value of ~4.698 Å at C/Zr ~0.831,2. This peak was not observed in this study or more recent studies48,49,53 instead the lattice parameter appears to increase monotonically as stoichiometry is approached. This study has shown that the sintering temperature and carbon content produces a measurable impact on the lattice parameter values and their referenced stoichiometry. It is proposed that a carbon gradient and high temperature annealing can promote the ingress via diffusion of carbon into ZrC1x samples filling vacant sites. This increases the C/Zr of the samples resulting in incorrectly referenced lattice parameter data. The discrepancies in lattice parameter values could be due to the presence of gas interstitials contaminates54, existing in varying concentrations depending on fabrication techniques and substituting into vacant sites.

XRD was unable to detect the presence of excess graphite and the carbon present in the broad carbon structure. It is expected that residual carbon is dispersed within grain boundaries or the proportion is too small to be detected by XRD55. In addition, no other phases were discernible by XRD (see Supplementary Figure S1). This result was also consistent with other studies whose TEM analysis revealed amorphous carbon on the ~100 nanometre scale24. The extended network of intra and intergranular depressions as seen in the SEM images has also been observed in previous studies12,15,19,24. These features were seen to be comprised of sp2 pristine, ‘partially destroyed’ graphite and amorphous carbon structures can be seen from the Raman spectra of samples produced in this study. The pristine graphite Raman peak can be attributed to the graphite-like peak seen ~113 ppm in all 13C NMR spectra. As discussed previously, atoms in the broad amorphous carbon peak have a similar rapid relaxation time as graphite-like peaks but remain chemically distinct as determined from their position and line width in the NMR spectrum. Hence, the amorphous carbon and D-band present in Raman spectra can be assigned to the residual intergranular and intragranular carbon structures identified in Fig. 4 which may be remnants of soft phases that have been polished out of the sample or pores within the samples as a result of the fabrication process. As these features are not uniform in height, EDS analysis to further determine compositional details would be unreliable due to a combination of secondary emission phenomena and X-ray absorption. The presence of oxygen was not observed in the sample in XRD diffractograms or in Raman spectra56. However, this does not rule out their presence in the structure and further independent analysis techniques need to be undertaken to quantify the oxygen and nitrogen content of the samples.

As the samples studied via SEM were fabricated in the same hot-press run, the variation in grain size must be the result of the change in carbon content as all other conditions were the same. Assuming the decrease in grain size with increasing carbon content is the general trend for ZrC, it may explain the increase of some mechanical properties for example yield strength (via the Hall-Petch relationship57,58) and hardness with increasing carbon content that have been observed in the literature1,2.

Conclusion

Systematic studies using 13C NMR have shown for the first time that quantitative carbon speciation can be obtained in reactively hot pressed and sintered ZrC1−x samples at different temperatures. Multiple unique phases are observed by NMR in ZrC1−x samples that are not detectable in combustion carbon analysis or observed in XRD, techniques which are commonly used to determine the C/Zr ratio. Bulk carbon analysis techniques, such as combustion carbon analysis, that are standard practice in determining the carbon content of ZrC1−x samples are found to be inaccurate when used in isolation. This study demonstrates that bulk techniques are unable to discriminate between multiple carbon species, a proportion of which were found to be free carbon phases that were disassociated from the ZrC1−x structure. It is recommended that the correct determination of the carbon content requires the use of bulk techniques in conjunction with local quantitative techniques such as 13C NMR.

The C/Zr ratio was assessed and corrected from the combustion analyser values and lattice parameters compared with previous literature values. The structure of ZrC1−x has been shown to be stable up to 50% vacancy concentration whilst maintaining a NaCl structure which is lower than predicted by the phase diagram. The presence and systematic evolution of two unique carbon environments was observed via NMR for samples sintered at 1500 oC which suggests possible systematic ordering consistent with vacancy ordering schemes calculated using Density Functional Theory.

Future work will focus on the systematic evolution of oxygen and nitrogen with sintering temperature and how long annealing times affect the values of the thermophysical properties to develop an understanding of the competing effects in interstitial site occupancy with stoichiometry and sintering temperature.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information. (106.4KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Giulio Isacco Lampronti and Dr. Iris Buisman for their help with XRD and SEM work as well as Mr. Garry Stakalls. The authors would like to thank Dr. Claudia Gasparrini and Professor Luc Vandeperre for their comments and assistance. The authors would also like to also thank the Carbides for Future Fission Environments consortium, the Imperial Cambridge Open Centre for Doctoral Training in Nuclear Energy, The Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, Westinghouse Electric Sweden AB. This work was funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) grant number: EP/M018768/1 in addiation this material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number DOE -NE-00082222. 

Author contributions

Dhan-sham B.K. Rana wrote the main manuscript, formulated ideas and conducted the research. Ian Farnan contributed to the writing of the manuscript, supervised the research and contributed ideas. Eugenio Zapatas Solvas helped with the fabrication of the samples and reviewed the manuscript. William Lee contributed in early talks and reviewed the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-59698-6.

References

  • 1.Jackson, H. F. & Lee, W. E. 2.13 - Properties and Characteristics of ZrC. In Comprehensive Nuclear Materials (ed. Konings, R. J. M.) 339–372 (Elsevier, 2012).
  • 2.Katoh Y, Vasudevamurthy G, Nozawa T, Snead LL. Properties of zirconium carbide for nuclear fuel applications. J. Nucl. Mater. 2013;441:718–742. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.05.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jackson, H. F. et al. Microstructure of laser-melted zirconium carbide ceramics. vol. 222 (2010).
  • 4.Harrison RW, Lee WE. Processing and properties of ZrC, ZrN and ZrCN ceramics: a review. Adv. Appl. Ceram. 2016;115:294–307. doi: 10.1179/1743676115Y.0000000061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Toth, L. Transition Metal Carbides and Nitrides. (Elsevier, 2014).
  • 6.Giorgi E, Grasso S, Zapata-Solvas E, Lee WE. Reactive carbothermal reduction of ZrC and ZrOC using Spark Plasma Sintering. Adv. Appl. Ceram. 2018;117:s34–s47. doi: 10.1080/17436753.2018.1510817. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ang C, Williams T, Seeber A, Wang H, Cheng Y-B. Synthesis and Evolution of Zirconium Carbide via Sol–Gel Route: Features of Nanoparticle Oxide–Carbon Reactions. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2013;96:1099–1106. doi: 10.1111/jace.12260. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wei B, et al. Densification, mechanical and thermal properties of ZrC1 − x ceramics fabricated by two-step reactive hot pressing of ZrC and ZrH2 powders. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2018;38:411–419. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.09.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chu A, et al. Carbothermal synthesis of ZrC powders using a combustion synthesis precursor. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2013;36:204–210. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2012.08.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mahday AA, Sherif El-Eskandarany M, Ahmed HA, Amer AA. Mechanically induced solid state carburization for fabrication of nanocrystalline ZrC refractory material powders. J. Alloys Compd. 2000;299:244–253. doi: 10.1016/S0925-8388(99)00679-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cui XM, Nam YS, Lee JY, Park WH. Fabrication of zirconium carbide (ZrC) ultra-thin fibers by electrospinning. Mater. Lett. 2008;62:1961–1964. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2007.10.051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schönfeld, K. (PDF) Pressureless sintering of ZrC with variable stoichiometry. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40145-017-0229-1.pdf (2017).
  • 13.Leipold, M. H. & Nielsen, T. H. Mechanical Properties of Hot-Pressed Zirconium Carbide Tested to 2600oC. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 47, (1964).
  • 14.Chakrabarti, T., Rangaraj, L. & Jayaram, V. On the Low Temperature Densification of Reactively Hot Pressed Non-Stoichiometric Monolithic and Binary Zirconium Carbide. Mater. Today 11 (2015).
  • 15.Zhao, L. Pressureless sintering of ZrC-based ceramics by enhancing powder sinterability - ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263436811000527 (2011).
  • 16.Gosset D, Dollé M, Simeone D, Baldinozzi G, Thomé L. Structural evolution of zirconium carbide under ion irradiation. J. Nucl. Mater. 2008;373:123–129. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.05.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pellegrino S, Thomé L, Debelle A, Miro S, Trocellier P. Radiation effects in carbides: TiC and ZrC versus SiC. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B. Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2014;327:103–107. doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2013.11.046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Huang Y, Maier BR, Allen TR. Irradiation-induced effects of proton irradiation on zirconium carbides with different stoichiometries. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2014;277:55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Motta, A., Sridharan, K., Morgan, D. & Szlufarska, I. Understanding the Irradiation Behavior of Zirconium Carbide. http://www.osti.gov/scitech/servlets/purl/1097003 (2013).
  • 20.Ulmer CJ, Motta AT, Kirk MA. In situ ion irradiation of zirconium carbide. J. Nucl. Mater. 2015;466:606–614. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.08.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Naomi O, Noboru N. Superlattice formation in zirconium-carbon system. J. Nucl. Mater. 1976;60:39–42. doi: 10.1016/0022-3115(76)90115-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gan J, Yang Y, Dickson C, Allen T. Proton irradiation study of GFR candidate ceramics. J. Nucl. Mater. 2009;389:317–325. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.02.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Savvatimskiy AI, Onufriev SV, Muboyadzhyan SA, Seredkin NN. Experimental study of high-temperature properties of zirconium carbide as a protective material for nuclear power and aerospace technologies (from 2000 to 5000 K) J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2017;891:012318. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/891/1/012318. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhou Y, Heitmann TW, Fahrenholtz WG, Hilmas GE. Synthesis of ZrCx with controlled carbon stoichiometry by low temperature solid state reaction. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2019;39:2594–2600. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.03.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Storms, E. K. & Wagner, P. Thermal conductivity of substoichiometric ZrC and NbC. (1973).
  • 26.Hayashi S, Hayamizu K. Chemical Shift Standards in High-Resolution Solid-State NMR (1) 13 C, 29Si, and 1 H Nuclei. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1991;64:685–687. doi: 10.1246/bcsj.64.685. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fernández Guillermet A. Analysis of thermochemical properties and phase stability in the zirconium-carbon system. J. Alloys Compd. 1995;217:69–89. doi: 10.1016/0925-8388(94)01310-E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jia P, et al. Evolution of Phase, Microstructure and ZrC Lattice Parameter in Solid-solution-treated W-ZrC Composite. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:6531. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06301-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Da A, et al. Preparation of nano-sized zirconium carbide powders through a novel active dilution self-propagating high temperature synthesis method. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol.-Mater Sci. Ed. 2015;30:729–734. doi: 10.1007/s11595-015-1220-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hodkiewicz, J. & Scientific, T. F. Characterizing Carbon Materials with Raman Spectroscopy. Applciation Notes Thermoscientific 5.
  • 31.Freitas JCC, Emmerich FG, Cernicchiaro GRC, Sampaio LC, Bonagamba TJ. Magnetic Susceptibility Effects on 13 C MAS NMR Spectra of Carbon Materials and Graphite. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 2001;20:61–73. doi: 10.1006/snmr.2001.0030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hielscher, R. et al. MTEX. MTEX is a free Matlab toolbox for analyzing and modeling crystallographic textures by means of EBSD or pole figure data. https://mtex-toolbox.github.io/.
  • 33.Compositional and grain size dependence of the mechanical properties of ZrCx: Effect of annealing on ZrC0.45. Ceram. Int. 45, 6135–6142 (2019).
  • 34.Raman spectroscopy of graphene and graphite: Disorder, electron–phonon coupling, doping and nonadiabatic effects. Solid State Commun. 143, 47–57 (2007).
  • 35.Ferrari AC, Robertson J. Resonant Raman spectroscopy of disordered, amorphous, and diamondlike carbon. Phys. Rev. B. 2001;64:075414. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.075414. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang J-X, et al. Synthesis of nanocrystallized zirconium carbide based on an aqueous solution-derived precursor. RSC Adv. 2017;7:22722–22727. doi: 10.1039/C7RA02586F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jerng S-K, et al. Graphitic carbon growth on crystalline and amorphous oxide substrates using molecular beam epitaxy. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2011;6:565. doi: 10.1186/1556-276X-6-565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Influence of free carbon on the characteristics of ZrC and deposition of near-stoichiometric ZrC in TRISO coated particle fuel. J. Nucl. Mater. 451, 97–103 (2014).
  • 39.Aihara J, Yamabe T, Hosoya H. Aromatic character of graphite and carbon nanotubes. Synth. Met. 1994;64:309–313. doi: 10.1016/0379-6779(94)90128-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dychalska A, et al. Study of CVD diamond layers with amorphous carbon admixture by Raman scattering spectroscopy. Mater. Sci.-Pol. 2015;33:799–805. doi: 10.1515/msp-2015-0067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dash RK, Yushin G, Gogotsi Y. Synthesis, structure and porosity analysis of microporous and mesoporous carbon derived from zirconium carbide. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2005;86:50–57. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.05.047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sternfeld Tamar, Thilgen Carlo, Chen Zhongfang, Siefken Siefke, Schleyer Paul von Ragué, Thiel Walter, Diederich François, Rabinovitz Mordecai. Fullerene Anions of Different Sizes and Shapes:  A13C NMR and Density-Functional Study. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2003;68(12):4850–4854. doi: 10.1021/jo030106n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhang Y, Liu B, Wang J. Self-assembly of Carbon Vacancies in Sub-stoichiometric ZrC1−x. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:18098. doi: 10.1038/srep18098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Xie, C. et al. Effect of carbon vacancies on structural and mechanical properties of stable zirconium carbides: A first principles study. ArXiv150900162 Cond-Mat (2015).
  • 45.Gusev, A. I., Rempel, A. A. & Magerl, A. J. Disorder and Order in Strongly Nonstoichiometric Compounds: Transition Metal Carbides, Nitrides and Oxides. (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013).
  • 46.Gusev AI. Short-range Order and Local Displacements of the Atoms in Non-stoichiometric Compounds. Russ. Chem. Rev. 1988;57:913–928. doi: 10.1070/RC1988v057n10ABEH003401. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cetinkaya S. Synthesis of fine zirconium carbide powder by carbothermal reaction of carbon-coated zirconia particles. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2017;100:5444–5449. doi: 10.1111/jace.15118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nachiappan C, Rangaraj L, Divakar C, Jayaram V. Synthesis and Densification of Monolithic Zirconium Carbide by Reactive Hot Pressing. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010;93:1341–1346. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Nakayama H, Ozaki K, Nabeta T, Nakajima Y. Composition Dependence of Lattice Parameter, Thermal and Electrical Properties in ZrCx Compounds. Mater. Trans. 2017;58:852–856. doi: 10.2320/matertrans.M2016283. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Taylor & Storms. Thermal Transport in Refractory Carbides. In International Conference on The Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Thermal Conductivity 161–173, 10.1007/978-1-4899-3751- (Springer, 1975).
  • 51.Storms EK, Griffin J. The vaporization behavior of the defect carbides. IV. The zirconium-carbon system. High Temp. Sci. 1973;5:291–310. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sara RV. The System Zirconium—Carbon. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1965;48:243–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1965.tb14729.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Norton, J. T. & Lewis, R. K. Properties Of Non-Stoichiometric Metallic Carbides. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19650026243.pdf (1964).
  • 54.Tewary VK. Lattice distortion due to gas interstitials in bcc metals. J. Phys. F. Met. Phys. 1973;3:1515. doi: 10.1088/0305-4608/3/8/006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Almeida Costa Oliveira F, et al. Synthesis of tungsten sub-carbide W2C from graphite/tungsten powder mixtures by eruptive heating in a solar furnace. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2007;25:351–357. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2006.10.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tamura K, Ogawa T, Fukuda K. The oxidation behavior of ZrC coating and powder studied by laser Raman spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. J. Nucl. Mater. 1990;175:266–269. doi: 10.1016/0022-3115(90)90218-C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hall–Petch relation and boundary strengthening. Scr. Mater. 51, 801–806 (2004).
  • 58.Whang S.H. Nanostructured Metals and Alloys. 2011. Introduction; pp. xxi–xxxv. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information. (106.4KB, docx)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES