Skip to main content
American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports logoLink to American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports
. 2020 Jan 30;18:100611. doi: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100611

Sclero-conjunctival ischaemia secondary to intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma

Lisa McAnena a,, Zishan Naeem a, Catriona Duncan b, Fergus Robertson b, Mandeep S Sagoo a,c,d, M Ashwin Reddy a,c
PMCID: PMC7033318  PMID: 32149200

Abstract

Purpose

Intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC), delivered directly to the globe via the internal carotid artery is now an established treatment for retinoblastoma. We report a case of anterior segment ischaemia following treatment with multiple intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) infusions.

Observations

A 5 month old female presented with bilateral retinoblastoma and was treated with 12 infusions of IAC. Her right eye was enucleated at diagnosis. After her seventh IAC treatment, she developed ipsilateral sixth and third cranial nerve palsies. After the twelfth IAC, she developed an area of conjunctival and scleral ischaemia between 12 and 3 o'clock meridians in her left eye. However, she maintained visual acuity of LogMAR 0.34.

Conclusions and Importance

The median number of IAC treatments in large studies is three. It is possible that repeated doses of IAC have an accumulative negative effect on the ocular blood supply, risking anterior segment and neurologic sequelae. This case highlights the significant challenge of balancing the salvage of eyes and vision with the potentially significant morbidity associated with IAC.

Keywords: Retinoblastoma, Intra-arterial chemotherapy

1. Introduction

We report a case of anterior segment ischaemia following treatment with multiple intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) infusions.

2. Case report

A 5 month old white female presented with right leukocoria. She had no significant family history. She was diagnosed with bilateral retinoblastomas, Group E (right eye) and group B (left eye) according to International Intraocular Retinoblastoma Classification1, H1cT3c (Right Eye) H1cT1b (left eye)1 Genetic analysis revealed a heterozygous RB1 exon 17 mutation (c.1630delA) The right Group E eye2 was enucleated at presentation. Her left eye had five extra-foveal tumours for which she received six cycles of systemic chemotherapy with vincristine, etoposide and carboplatin.

Tumor #1 was close to the optic nerve and relapsed repeatedly despite judicious transpupillary therapy away from the nerve (Fig. 1). It was treated a total of 12 infusions of IAC (4 cycles of 3 injections each at 3 weeks apart). For her first round of treatment, she received 2 doses each of 3mg melphalan and 0.3mg Topotecan. The final dose was increased to 4mg and topotecan 0.3mg as we use age appropriate doses3,4 and she had turned 12 months. This was effective for 2 years and 5 months and there were no complications from the IAC. Tumor#1 relapsed again and this time 5mg melphalan and 1 mg topotecan was used for the 3 injections of the 2nd cycle. A slight ptosis and supratrochlear rash followed but no other complications ensued. There was a complete response following the second cycle. After 4 months, Tumor #1 relapsed again and as she was 4 years of age, the dose was increased to melphalan 7.5mg and topotecan 1.5mg for her 3rd cycle and she developed lid swelling. Our practice is to give steroid drops for 3 weeks and oral steroids for 5 days tds (100 μg/kg). After the swelling she developed a third and sixth nerve palsy with an increase in the ptosis. The sixth nerve palsy was severe causing a −7 limitation of movement (severe restriction past the midline). Again, a complete response was achieved. There was no neutropenia after chemotherapy. After 5 months, yet again Tumor #1 relapsed and as the maximum dose of melphalan had already been given (for our unit), we opted for carboplatin 30mg and topotecan 1.5mg. After the twelfth IAC, she developed an area of conjunctival and scleral ischaemia between 12 and 3 o'clock meridians in her left eye (Fig. 2). Fluorescein demonstrated conjunctival ischaemia in this region (Fig. 3). There was no corresponding corneal epithelial abnormality and at 14 months following the onset of this sign (5 years after her initial diagnosis), she is pain free with visual acuity of LogMAR 0.34 with an adjusted head posture to compensate for her ptosis and third and sixth cranial nerve palsies. Tumor #1 has regressed without further relapse. There was no corresponding area of choroidal ischaemia on fluorescein angiography. There has been no scleromalacia or anterior staphyloma. The sixth nerve palsy has improved over 24 months from −7 to −4.5 limitation but the upward limitation remains at −3.5 and downward limitation has improved from −3.5 to −2.5. There is restriction in all directions when forced duction tests were performed and the eye is enophthalmic. The ptosis has slightly improved but remains after 24 months. She had a dominant accessory supply from the middle meningeal artery and this was used for the first 9 treatments. Unfortunately, it stenosed off and the smaller ophthalmic artery was used for the last 3 injections.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Relapse of juxtapapillary tumor.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Focal sclero-conjunctival ischaemia of the left eye.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Anterior fluorescein angiography.

3. Discussion

Treatment of retinoblastoma has undergone a dramatic evolution over the past three decades; from external beam radiation therapy, now known to cause increased mortality from secondary tumours in patients with germ-line mutations5,6 to systemic intravenous chemotherapy (IVC) with focal laser and/or cryotherapy as standard treatment in the 1990s.7,8 Intra-arterial chemotherapy, delivered directly to the globe via the internal carotid artery is now an established treatment, used as first-line treatment or second line after systemic chemotherapy3,4,9, 10, 11, 12, 13

IAC, along with intravitreal chemotherapy, are now being used both to salvage more eyes as well as retain function, where previously enucleation would have been the only option. However, IAC carries the risk of significant complications. These may include systemic complications such as bradycardia, hypotension, myelosuppression or allergic reactions.3,15, 16, 17 Local ophthalmic complications are commonly vascular in nature and include retinal or vitreous haemorrhage and retinal or choroidal vascular occlusions, including vein occlusions.12,15,16,18, 19, 20, 21 Rates of complications secondary to IAC are decreasing, however, as catheterisation techniques are improved19 and chemotherapy doses are adjusted to patient age.4 A median of 3 treatments has been reported in large case series12,15,22 and at our own centre.4 Tsimpida et al.23 found a visual loss rate of 42% for refractory retinoblastoma that was treated with IAC. However, by using age-appropriate dosing of melphalan, Reddy et al.4 demonstrated no visual loss in patients with healthy foveolae. The potential for visual loss was a major concern as this child was dependent on her only remaining eye for vision and she had a cumulative dose of 47.5 mg of melphalan. Francis et al. determined that a reduction in ERG became statistically significant at a cutoff cumulative dose of 14mg of melphalan, suggesting cumulative doses can have a deleterious effect on the retina. By multivariate analysis, however, they found that neither topotecan nor carboplatin had an effect on the ERG.23 There have been few studies on the complications of topotecan and carboplatin. It has been shown that like melphalan, these drugs are toxic to the RPE.24 Gobin et al. have shown that 50mg carboplatin can cause massive edema of the peri-ocular structures and possible myositis.3 Our patient had 3 doses of 30mg carboplatin. Daniels et al. have used animal model evidence to show that the doses of melphalan and carboplatin are the most important factors related to complications not catheterisation technique25: indeed this corroborates Reddy et al.'s findings.4 As topotecan has rarely been given without agents such as melphalan or carboplatin, it is difficult to tease out the topotecan specific complications of IAC.

We have previously reported anterior segment invasion by the tumor in eyes receiving IAC as salvage.26 Anterior segment ischaemia is an unusual complication of IAC, and, to the best of our knowledge, this case of sclero-conjunctival ischaemia secondary to IAC is unique. This is most likely due to the high number of IAC treatments (12 to date) that have been necessary to salvage this patient's remaining eye. It is possible that repeated doses of IAC have a summative effect on the ocular blood supply, risking anterior segment and neurologic sequelae. .

We would like to highlight that it is very unusual to administer such a large number of IAC infusions and that the rationale in this case was salvage of residual function in an only eye. Despite the significant morbidity from the treatment, this 5 year-old girl has functional vision in her remaining eye, with disease quiescence at most recent follow up (17 months since last treatment aged 6). Close observation will be continued in order to detect any future scleromalacia or anterior staphyloma and possible relapse.

4. Conclusion

This case highlights the significant challenge of balancing the salvage of eyes and vision with the potentially significant morbidity associated with IAC.

Patient consent

Consent to publish the case report was not obtained. This report does not contain any personal information that could lead to the identification of the patient.

Acknowledgements and Disclosures

There was no funding or grant support for this case report. The following authors have no financial disclosures: LM, MS, MR. All authors attest that they meet the current ICMJE criteria for Authorship. There are no further relevant acknowledgements.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100611.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.xml (308B, xml)

References

  • 1.Amin M.B., Greene F.L., Edge S.B. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(2):93–99. doi: 10.3322/caac.21388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Linn Murphree A. Intraocular retinoblastoma: the case for a new group classification. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2005;18(1):41–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ohc.2004.11.003. viii. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gobin Y.P., Dunkel I.J., Marr B.P. Intra-arterial chemotherapy for the management of retinoblastoma: four-year experience. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129(6):732–737. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Reddy M.A., Naeem Z., Duncan C. Reduction of severe visual loss and complications following intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) for refractory retinoblastoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(12):1704–1708. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wong F.L., Boice J.D., Jr., Abramson D.H. Cancer incidence after retinoblastoma. Radiation dose and sarcoma risk. JAMA. 1997;278(15):1262–1267. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.15.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Eng C., Li F.P., Abramson D.H. Mortality from second tumors among long-term survivors of retinoblastoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(14):1121–1128. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.14.1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chan H.S., Gallie B.L., Munier F.L. Chemotherapy for retinoblastoma. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2005;18(1):55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ohc.2004.11.002. viii. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ferris F.L., 3rd, Chew E.Y. A new era for the treatment of retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114(11):1412. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1996.01100140612015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Peterson E.C., Elhammady M.S., Quintero-Wolfe S. Selective ophthalmic artery infusion of chemotherapy for advanced intraocular retinoblastoma: initial experience with 17 tumors. J Neurosurg. 2011;114(6):1603–1608. doi: 10.3171/2011.1.JNS10466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Muen W.J., Kingston J.E., Robertson F. Efficacy and complications of super-selective intra-ophthalmic artery melphalan for the treatment of refractory retinoblastoma. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(3):611–616. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Venturi C., Bracco S., Cerase A. Superselective ophthalmic artery infusion of melphalan for intraocular retinoblastoma: preliminary results from 140 treatments. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(4):335–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02296.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shields C.L., Manjandavida F.P., Lally S.E. Intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma in 70 eyes: outcomes based on the international classification of retinoblastoma. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(7):1453–1460. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Francis J.H., Brodie S.E., Marr B. Efficacy and toxicity of intravitreous chemotherapy for retinoblastoma: four-year experience. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(4):488–495. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.12.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wang L., Han M., Zhao J. Intra-arterial chemotherapy for unilateral advanced intraocular retinoblastoma: results and short-term complications. Medicine (Baltim) 2018;97(42) doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Abramson D.H., Daniels A.B., Marr B.P. Intra-arterial chemotherapy (ophthalmic artery chemosurgery) for group D retinoblastoma. PloS One. 2016;11(1) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Requejo F., Marelli J., Ruiz Johnson A. The technique of superselective ophthalmic artery chemotherapy for retinoblastoma: the Garrahan Hospital experience. Intervent Neuroradiol. 2018;24(1):93–99. doi: 10.1177/1591019917738962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ancona-Lezama D., Dalvin L.A., Lucio-Alvarez J.A. Ophthalmic vascular events after intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma: real-world comparison between primary and secondary treatments. Retina. 2018 doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dalvin L.A., Ancona-Lezama D., Lucio-Alvarez J.A. Ophthalmic vascular events after primary unilateral intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma in early and recent eras. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(11):1803–1811. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tuncer S., Sencer S., Kebudi R. Superselective intra-arterial chemotherapy in the primary management of advanced intra-ocular retinoblastoma: first 4-year experience from a single institution in Turkey. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94(7):e644–e651. doi: 10.1111/aos.13077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hua J., Gang S., Yizhou J. Intra-arterial chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced retinoblastoma: a 2-year single-center study in China. J Canc Res Therapeut. 2018;14(1):106–110. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_722_17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Francis J.H., Levin A.M., Zabor E.C. Ten-year experience with ophthalmic artery chemosurgery: ocular and recurrence-free survival. PloS One. 2018;13(5) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tsimpida M., Thompson D.A., Liasis A. Visual outcomes following intraophthalmic artery melphalan for patients with refractory retinoblastoma and age appropriate vision. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(11):1464–1470. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Susskind D., Hagemann U., Schrader M. Toxic effects of melphalan, topotecan and carboplatin on retinal pigment epithelial cells. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94(5):471–478. doi: 10.1111/aos.12990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Daniels A.B., Froehler M.T., Nunnally A.H. Rabbit model of intra-arterial chemotherapy toxicity demonstrates retinopathy and vasculopathy related to drug and dose, not procedure or approach. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(4):954–964. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-25346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pavlidou E., Burris C., Thaung C. Anterior segment seeding in eyes with retinoblastoma failing to respond to intraophthalmic artery chemotherapy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(12):1455–1458. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.2861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.xml (308B, xml)

Articles from American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES