In the original article, the figure legends were associated with the wrong figures. Figure 4 should be Figure 2, Figure 2 should be Figure 3, and Figure 3 should be Figure 4. The legends remain the same. The figures and their correct legends appear below.
Figure 4.
Phylogenetic tree constructed using MP based on complete CP genomes of six Dracaena and other 31 species. Numbers above the branches are the bootstrap support values.
Figure 2.
Repeat analysis in six Dracaena CP genomes. REPuter was used to identify repeat sequences with length ≥30 bp and sequence identified ≥90% in the CP genomes. F, P, R, and C indicate the repeat types F (forward), P (palindrome), R (reverse), and C (complement), respectively. Repeats with different lengths are indicated in different colors.
Figure 3.
Structure comparison of the six Dracaena CP genomes by using the mVISTA program. Gray arrows and thick black lines above the alignment indicate genes with their orientation and the position of the IRs, respectively. A cut-off value of 70% identity was used for the plots, and the Y-scale represents the percent identity between 50% and 100%.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.