Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Feb 21;15(2):e0229282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229282

Dietary supplementation with copper nanoparticles influences the markers of oxidative stress and modulates vasodilation of thoracic arteries in young Wistar rats

Michał Majewski 1,*, Bernadetta Lis 2, Beata Olas 2, Katarzyna Ognik 3, Jerzy Juśkiewicz 4
Editor: Michael Bader5
PMCID: PMC7034852  PMID: 32084205

Abstract

We aimed to study the physiological effects of diet supplemented with copper (Cu) nanoparticles (NPs). During the eight weeks of the experiment, young Wistar rats (at seven weeks of age, n = 9) were supplemented with 6.5 mg of Cu either as NPs or carbonate salt (Cu6.5). A diet that was not supplemented with Cu served as a negative control (Cu0). The impact of nano Cu supplementation on lipid (reflected as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances–TBARS) and protein peroxidation (thiol and carbonyl groups) in blood plasma as well as the influence on the vasodilatory mechanism(s) of isolated rat thoracic arteries were studied. Supplementation with Cu enhanced lipid peroxidation (TBARS) in NP6.5 (x2.4) and in Cu6.5 (x1.9) compared to the negative control. Significant increase in TBARS was also observed in NP6.5 (x1.3) compared to the Cu6.5 group. The level of thiol groups increased in NP6.5 (x1.6) compared to Cu6.5. Meanwhile, significant (x0.6) decrease was observed in the Cu6.5 group compared to the negative control. Another marker of protein oxidation, carbonyl groups increased in NP6.5 (x1.4) and Cu6.5 (x2.3) compared to the negative control. However significant difference (x0.6) was observed between NP6.5 and Cu6.5. Arteries from Cu supplemented rats exhibited an enhanced vasodilation to gasotransmitters: nitric oxide (NO) and carbon monoxide (CO). An enhanced vasodilation to NO was reflected in the increased response to acetylcholine (ACh) and calcium ionophore A23187. The observed responses to ACh and CO releasing molecule (CORM-2) were more pronounced in NP6.5. The activator of cGMP-dependent protein kinases (8-bromo-cGMP) induced similar vasodilation of thoracic arteries in NP6.5 and Cu0 groups, while an increased response was observed in the Cu6.5 group. Preincubation with the inducible nitric oxide (iNOS) synthase inhibitor– 1400W, decreased the ACh-induced vasodilation in NP6.5, exclusively. Meanwhile the eicosanoid metabolite of arachidonic acid (20-HETE) synthesis inhibitor–HET0016, enhanced vasodilation of arteries from Cu0 group. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that supplementation with nano Cu influences oxidative stress, which further has modified the vascular response.

Introduction

Copper (Cu) is one of the most important microelements involved in energy metabolism, antioxidant defense, and the synthesis of neurotransmitters and neuropeptides. Cu is involved in tryptophan metabolism by regulating the activity of enzymes in the kynurenine pathway [1], which can generate toxic products when dysregulated [2]. Moreover, Cu is able to modulate systemic inflammation by inducing arachidonic acid conversion and prostanoid synthesis [3].

Recently, nanoparticles (NPs) have emerged as important players in modern medicine. However, NPs tend to exhibit quite different properties, when compared to larger particles of the same element. Once entering circulation, NPs interact with the endothelium and induce nitric oxide (NO) signaling impairment. Oxidative stress and inflammatory response is the mechanism of metal NPs [4,5].

We have previously reported that an oral exposure to nano Cu (6.5 mg Cu/kg of a diet) modulated the antioxidant capacity of blood plasma and vascular response [6]. Modified response to ACh [6] and increased contraction to prostaglandin F2-alpha were observed [7] with no attenuation of endothelin–1-induced contraction [7]. Surprisingly, several studies have reported a beneficial anti-diabetic and cardioprotective role of CuNPs with a decreased production of inflammatory mediators [8,9,10,11,12].

Oxidative modifications of plasma lipids and proteins have been previously reported in various conditions, including cardiovascular disorders, with a great influence on the vascular reactivity [13].

The vascular endothelium plays an important role in maintaining cardiovascular homeostasis by synthesizing and releasing several vasoactive substances, including vasodilator and vasoconstrictor prostanoid, gasotransmitters: nitric oxide (NO) and carbon monoxide (CO), and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factors [14].

Endothelial dysfunction is usually associated with a reduction in NO production and/or an increase in NO metabolism. On the other hand, overproduction of NO by the inducible form of NO synthase (iNOS) may contribute to hypotension, cardio-depression and vascular hyporeactivity.

Next to NO, another gasotransmitter, CO, plays an important physiological role in the regulation of vascular tone and inflammation. It is very important that in cardiovascular system, CO does not work often in an isolation, but it may interact with reactive oxygen species (ROS) or reactive nitrogen species (RNS), i.e. NO [15].

Moreover, arachidonic acid metabolites, which are produced through cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes influence cardiovascular homeostasis. 20-Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (20-HETE) is a major biologically active CYP450 metabolite. Human CYP4A11 and CYP1A2 metabolize arachidonic acid to 20-hydroxyecostearonic acid (20-HETE), which is a vasoconstrictor. HET0016 confers anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory effects in the arteries by disrupting 20-HETE-mediated signaling pathways in the vascular wall [16].

In view of presented data, we aimed to determine the effects of nano Cu supplementation on oxidative stress markers, i.e. lipid peroxidation (reflected as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances–TBARS) and protein oxidation level (thiol and carbonyl groups) in blood plasma. Moreover we aimed to analyze the endothelium-dependent response to: (i) analog of cGMP, (ii) calcium ionophore, A23187, which is muscarinic receptor independent mechanism, and (iii) CO donor–CORM-2. As the mechanism(s) involved in ACh-induced vasodilation of thoracic arteries remain controversial, we aimed to explain this effect with the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) inhibitor– 1400W, and the 20-HETE synthesis inhibitor–HET0016.

Materials and methods

Drugs and reagents

The drugs used were: acetylcholine (ACh) as chloride, noradrenaline (NA) as hydrochloride, A23187, tricarbonyl-dichlororuthenium (II) dimer (CORM-2), 8-bromo-cGMP, 1400W, A23187 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and HET0016 (Cayman chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Stock solutions (10 mM) of these drugs were prepared in distilled water, except for NA which was dissolved in NaCl (0.9%) + ascorbic acid (0.01% w/v) solution. HET0016 was dissolved in ethanol. CORM-2 and 1400W were dissolved in methanol. The maximal solvent concentration in the medium was less than 0.001% (vol/vol). These solutions were maintained at –20°C and appropriate dilutions were made in Krebs-Henseleit solution (KHS in mmol/l: NaCl 115; CaCl2 2.5; KCl 4.6; KH2PO4 1.2; MgSO4 1.2; NaHCO3 25; glucose 11.1) on the day of the experiment.

Cu carbonate (purity ≥ 99%) was sourced from Poch (Gliwice, Poland). The nano Cu particles (40–60 nm size nanopowder, 12 m2/g) were purchased from Sky Spring Nanomaterials, Inc. (Houston, TX, US), with a purity of 99.9% on a trace metals basis, with a spherical morphology of 0.19 g/cm3 bulk density, and an 8.9 g/cm3 true density. The zeta potential of NPs was determined to be −30.3 mV (phosphate-buffered saline), for more details see Ognik et al [12].

Thiobarbituric acid was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All other reagents were of analytical grade and were provided by commercial suppliers.

Ethical statements

All procedures were approved by the Local Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments in Olsztyn, Poland (Permission Number: 65/2017) according to European Union guidelines (Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments) and conform to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH Publications No. 86–26, revised 2014). The 3R rule (“Replacement, Reduction and Refinement”) was respected in the study. All surgery was performed under ketamine+xylazine anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize animal suffering.

Experimental protocol

Healthy male albino Wistar rats (Han IGS rat [Crl: WI(Han)]), were housed individually in stainless steel cages under a stable temperature of 21–22°C, a ventilation rate of 20 air changes per hour and a relative humidity of 50 ± 10%. During this period, the rats had free access to tap water and were fed ad libitum.

At seven weeks of age, rats were randomly divided into three groups of 9 animals each. Experimental rats were supplemented with a standard dose of Cu (6.5 mg/kg of diet) [7,11,17,18] either as Cu carbonate (Cu6.5 –the control group) or nano Cu (NP6.5). Moreover, a negative control not supplemented with Cu (Cu0) was implemented in this study. Cu as a nano-suspension was prepared in rapeseed oil [19], and the same amount of pure rapeseed oil was added to the other two experimental diets to have equivalent oil content. The experimental diets were modifications of a casein diet for laboratory rodents recommended by the American Institute of Nutrition, and were prepared weekly and then stored at 4°C in hermetic containers [6].

Experimental procedures in rats and study analysis

Rats were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine+xylazine (100 mg/kg+10 mg/kg of body weight) and killed by decapitation. Immediately after blood collection, samples were kept in tubes containing heparin + EDTA as an anticoagulant. Samples were centrifuged at 3,000 g for 10 min and blood plasma was separated and stored at –80°C until further analysis [6].

Oxidative stress markers

Lipid peroxidation

Lipid peroxidation was quantified by measuring the concentration of TBARS. Samples of plasma were transferred to an equal volume of cold 15% (v/v) trichloroacetic acid in 0.25M HCl and 0.37M thiobarbituric acid in 0.25M HCl, immersed in a boiling water bath for 10 min, and then centrifugated at 10,000×g for 15 min, 18°C. Absorbance was measured at 535 nm (the SPECTROstar Nano Microplate Reader—BMG LABTECH Germany). The TBARS concentration was calculated using the molar extinction coefficient (ε = 156,000 M−1 cm−1) and was expressed as nmol/mL of plasma [20,21].

Protein peroxidation markers

Protein oxidation was quantified by measuring the carbonyl groups and thiol groups in blood plasma. The carbonyl group concentration was calculated using a molar extinction coefficient (ε = 22,000M−1cm−1), and was expressed as nmol carbonyl groups/mg of protein. The detection of protein carbonyls involves derivatization of the carbonyl groups with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH), which leads to the formation of a stable 2,4-dinitrophenyl (DNP) hydrazone product [21,22].

The thiol group content was measured spectrophotometrically (the SPECTROstar Nano Microplate Reader- BMG LABTECH Germany) by absorbance at 412 nm with Ellman's reagent: 5,5′-dithio-bis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid). The thiol group concentration was calculated using a molar extinction coefficient (ε = 13,600M−1cm−1). The level of thiol groups was expressed as nmol thiol groups/mg of protein [21,23,24].

Vascular reactivity studies

This was done in accordance to our previous study [6]. Briefly, thoracic arteries were carefully dissected out, cleaned of adherent tissue, and cut into 6–8 aortic rings of 3 to 4-mm length, placed in aerated KHS at 4°C and pH = 7.4. Thoracic rings were suspended under a resting tension of 1 g in 5-mL tissue baths (eight stagnant Graz Tissue Bath System chambers) containing KHS. The solution had been aerated with a carbogen gas (95% oxygen and 5% carbon dioxide), and maintained at 37°C during the study. Each ring was connected to an isometric force transducer with amplifier (F-30, TAM-A HSE).

The functional integrity of smooth muscles was checked with KCl (75 mM). After a washout period of 60 min, the presence of the vascular endothelium was confirmed by the ability of ACh (10 μM) to induce relaxation (80%) of the aortic rings precontracted with NA (0.1 μM). Next, the rings were rinsed with KHS for 60 min, and then cumulative concentration-response curves (CCRCs) to CORM-2 (1–100 μM), calcium ionophore–A23187 (0.1 nM–10 μM), and 8-bromo-cGMP (0.1–100 μM) were assessed to determine the relaxant responses of endothelium-intact rings that had been precontracted with submaximal concentrations of NA (0.1 μM).

In another set of experiments, ACh-induced vasodilation (0.1 nM–10 μM) was analyzed in the absence and presence of the iNOS inhibitor– 1400W (1 μM, 30 min), and the eicosanoid metabolite of arachidonic acid (20-HETE) synthesis inhibitor–HET0016 (0.1 μM, 30 min). Only one CCRC was performed on each aortic ring.

Data analysis and statistics

The calculations and graphs were done and analyzed in GraphPad Prism 8.3. Vasodilation induced by ACh, CORM-2, A23187 and 8-bromo-cGMP was represented as a percentage of the initial contraction elicited by NA (0.1 μM).

The maximal response (Emax, %), the potency (the pD2 values, measured as the negative logarithm of the concentration causing a half-maximum effect), and the area under the curve (AUC) were determined from the CCRCS by non-linear regression analysis.

The normality and homogeneity of variance was tested for all data. The group comparison was performed by one- or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post-hoc Tukey’s or Dunnett’s T3 test, where appropriate.

The results included in Table 1 are expressed as mean ± SEM and median (with Q1 and Q3), whereas Fig 1 presents results as mean ± SD from n = 9 rats per each group. Q1 and Q3 are the 25th and 75th percentiles. N varies among bioassays due to limitations on sample volume collected from animal subjects and/or data outlier detection by the Grubbs' test. A value of p ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Table 1. Blood plasma biomarkers of lipid and protein oxidation.

TBARS Thiol groups Carbonyl groups
Cu6.5 0.315 ± 0.022
0.302 (0.265−0.366)
2.995 ± 0.207
3.225 (2.4473.497)
1.250 ± 0.090
1.150 (1.071−1.458)
NP6.5 0.416 ± 0.018
0.412 (0.363−0.467)
4.773 ± 0.743
4.003 (3.1966.856)
0.786 ± 0.075
0.724 (0.612−0.941)
Cu0 0.170 ± 0.019
0.163 (0.116−0.215)
5.311 ± 0.591
5.881 (3.5746.528)
0.552 ± 0.041
0.507 (0.438−0.673)
*p-value
Cu6.5 vs. NP6.5 0.0033 0.05 0.0004
Cu6.5 vs. Cu0 0.0001 0.0118 <0.0001
NP6.5 vs. Cu0 <0.0001 0.9195 0.0299
Tukey’s test Dunnett’s T3 test Tukey’s test

Values are expressed as the mean ± SEM and median (with Q1 and Q3) from n = 9 rats per each group

*p ≤ 0.05 (one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons test). N varies among bioassays due to limitations on samples volume collected from animal subjects and/or data outlier detection by the Grubbs’ test. Q1 and Q3 are 25th and 75th percentiles.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Effects of experimental supplementation on (a) lipid peroxidation level–TBARS, (b) the thiol groups and (c) the carbonyl groups. Rats were supplemented with Cu (6.5 mg/kg of diet) either as Cu6.5 or NP6.5 (40 nm). A diet that was not supplemented with Cu served as a negative control–Cu0. Results are mean ± SD from n = 9 rats *p ≤ 0.05 (one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test).

Results

Blood biomarkers of oxidative stress

TBARS assay measures malondialdehyde, which is produced by lipid peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids. In comparison to the copper deficient diet, Cu supplementation markedly increased the concentration of TBARS in NP6.5 by 2.4-fold and in Cu6.5 by 1.9-fold (Table 1, Fig 1A).

However, when comparing two copper supplemented groups, lipid peroxidation was increased in NP6.5 by 1.3-fold (Fig 1A).

We have also compared the effects of Cu supplementation on plasma protein oxidation in two assays selected to measure free plasma thiol groups and carbonyl concentrations.

In Cu6.5 supplemented rats, both markers of protein oxidation did change; thiol groups decreased to 0.6-fold (Fig 1B), and the plasma protein carbonyl groups increased by 2.3-fold (Fig 1C). Meanwhile, supplementation with NP6.5 raised by 1.4-fold carbonyl groups exclusively, compared to Cu0 (Fig 1C).

Moreover, in NP6.5 supplemented groups protein thiols increased by 1.6-fold and carbonyl groups decreased to 0.6-fold, compared to Cu6.5 (Fig 1B and 1C).

Vascular reactivity studies

ACh (0.01 nM–10 μM), calcium ionophore A23187 (0.01 nM–10 μM), 8-bromo-cGMP (0.01 μM–1 mM), and CORM-2 (0.1 μM–1 nM) induced a concentration-dependent vasodilation of the isolated rat thoracic rings (Figs 26).

Fig 2. The cumulative concentration-response curves to acetylcholine (ACh, 10−11–10−5 M) in the isolated rat thoracic arteries.

Fig 2

Rats were supplemented with Cu (6.5 mg/kg of diet) either as Cu6.5 or NP6.5 (40 nm). A diet that was not supplemented with Cu served as a negative control–Cu0. (a) Control conditions. (b) Isolated rat arteries were pre-incubated with the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) inhibitor (1400W, 1 μM, 30 min). Results (mean ± SEM, n = 9) are expressed as a percentage of inhibition of the contraction induced by noradrenaline (0.1 μM) *p ≤ 0.05 (two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test).

Fig 6. The cumulative concentration-response curves to carbon monoxide releasing molecule, (CORM-2, 10−6–10−4 M) in the isolated rat thoracic arteries.

Fig 6

Rats were supplemented with Cu (6.5 mg/kg of diet) either as Cu6.5 or NP6.5 (40 nm). A diet that was not supplemented with Cu served as a negative control–Cu0. Results (mean ± SEM, n = 9) are expressed as a percentage of inhibition of the contraction induced by noradrenaline (0.1 μM), *p ≤ 0.05 (two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test).

The vasodilation induced by ACh was enhanced in the two Cu supplemented groups at the lower concentration range (10–100 nM), and was shifted to the left compared to Cu0 animals (Fig 2A). Significant increase in vasodilation was observed in nano Cu fed rats at lower concentrations, 0.1–1 nM compared to Cu6.5.

In the presence of the selective iNOS inhibitor, 1400W (1 μM, 30 min), vasodilation to ACh was enhanced in the Cu6.5 group compared to NP6.5 and Cu0 (Fig 2B). Meanwhile, in NP6.5 exclusively preincubation with 1400W attenuated the vascular response to ACh compared to the control conditions not treated with 1400W (Fig 3B). This was neither observed in the Cu6.5 nor in Cu0 group (Fig 3A and 3C).

Fig 3. The cumulative concentration-response curves to acetylcholine (ACh, 10−11–10−5 M) in the isolated rat thoracic arteries.

Fig 3

Rats were supplemented with Cu (6.5 mg/kg of diet) either as (a) Cu6.5 or (b) NP6.5 (40 nm). (c) A diet that was not supplemented with Cu served as a negative control–Cu0. ACh-induced vasodilation was analyzed in the absence and presence of the iNOS inhibitor (1400W, 1 μM, 30 min), and 20-HETE synthesis inhibitor (HET0016, 0.1 μM, 30 min). Results (mean ± SEM, n = 9) are expressed as a percentage of inhibition of the contraction induced by noradrenaline (0.1 μM), *p ≤ 0.05 (two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test).

Preincubation with the inhibitor of 20-HETE synthesis, HET0016 (0.1 μM, 30 min) resulted in an enhanced vasodilation to ACh in Cu0 rats (Fig 3C). In Cu6.5 and NP6.5, the vasodilation to ACh, in the presence of HET0016 remained unmodified (Fig 3A and 3B).

Calcium ionophore A23187, induced the concentration-dependent vasodilation which was potentiated in the NP6.5 and Cu6.5 group at 1–10 nM, compared to Cu0. Moreover, in NP6.5 the vasodilation was shifted to the right when compared to Cu6.5 (Fig 4).

Fig 4. The cumulative concentration-response curves to calcium ionophore (A23187, 10−11–10−5 M) in the isolated rat thoracic arteries.

Fig 4

Rats were supplemented with Cu (6.5 mg/kg of diet) either as Cu6.5 or NP6.5 (40 nm). A diet that was not supplemented with Cu served as a negative control–Cu0. Results (mean ± SEM, n = 9) are expressed as a percentage of inhibition of the contraction induced by noradrenaline (0.1 μM), *p ≤ 0.05 (two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test).

The vasodilation induced by the cell-permeable analog of cGMP, 8-bromo-cGMP (0.1–100 μM) was decreased in Cu0 and NP6.5 supplemented rats in a similar way, when compared to the Cu6.5 group (Fig 5).

Fig 5. The cumulative concentration-response curves to a cell-permeable analog of cGMP (8-bromo-cGMP, 10−8–10−3 M) in the isolated rat thoracic arteries.

Fig 5

Rats were supplemented with Cu (6.5 mg/kg of diet) either as Cu6.5 or NP6.5 (40 nm). A diet that was not supplemented with Cu served as a negative control–Cu0. Results (mean ± SEM, n = 9) are expressed as a percentage of inhibition of the contraction induced by noradrenaline (0.1 μM), *p ≤ 0.05 (two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test).

The vascular response to CO releasing molecule, CORM-2 was enhanced in Cu supplemented rats at 31.63–100 μM, and to a greater extent in NP6.5 (3.16 μM–1 nM) (Fig 6). Significant increase in vasodilation was also observed in NP6.5 fed rats at 3.16–10 μM compared to Cu6.5, which is similar to the response described for ACh at lower concentration range (0.1–1 nM).

The effects of different drugs used on the Emax (%), the pD2 and AUC are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2. Changes in the maximal response (Emax, %), pD2 parameters and AUC to vasodilators: acetylcholine (ACh), calcium ionophore (A23187), 8-bromo-cGMP and carbon monoxide releasing molecule (CORM-2) in the isolated thoracic rings from experimental Wistar rats.

Cu6.5 a NP6.5 Cu0 b
Emax (%) pD2 AUC Emax (%) pD2 AUC Emax (%) pD2 AUC
ACh 95.72 ± 9.06 b 7.57 ± 0.24 b 337.0 ± 36.61 b 100.9 ± 9.45 b 7.89 ± 0.32 b 387.0 ± 27.23 a, b 86.70 ± 6.06 7.14 ± 0.13 275.3 ± 28.78
+
1400W
104.1 ± 6.06 b 7.96 ± 0.20 412.3 ± 17.59 b * 92.76 ± 8.71 a 7.46 ± 0.26 b 322.3 ± 41.04 a * 85.82 ± 11.63 7.61 ± 0.36 315.9 ± 34.52 *
+ HET0016 97.59 ± 7.01 7.73 ± 0.27 370.0 ± 30.54 99.98 ± 5.36 7.66 ± 0.21 394.6 ± 28.87 100.1 ± 4.04 * 7.69 ± 0.11 * 373.2 ± 16.40 *
A23187 111.6 ± 5.71 8.31 ± 0.23 b 463.8 ± 8.029 b 108.3 ± 3.66 7.84 ± 0.09 a 422.0 ± 5.831 a, b 102.8 ± 3.80 7.31 ± 0.11 340.5 ± 13.93
8-bromo-cGMP 109.0 ± 15.6 5.82 ± 0.26 b 293.1 ± 25.96 b 109.6 ± 18.2 5.13 ± 0.36 a 226.7 ± 33.51 a 107.6 ± 9.97 4.93 ± 0.20 208.0 ± 28.77
CORM-2 79.35 ± 6.94 b 4.84 ± 0.11 151.6 ± 11.66 b 95.50 ± 8.30 a, b 5.07 ± 0.26 194.3 ± 18.15 a, b 55.73 ± 6.36 4.71 ± 0.13 99.42 ± 17.68

Rats were supplemented for 8 weeks with 6.5 mg Cu/kg of a diet either as copper carbonate (Cu6.5) or nano Cu (NP6.5, 40 nm). The negative control was not supplemented with Cu–Cu deficient diet (Cu0). Acetylcholine-induced vasodilation was analyzed in the absence and presence of the iNOS inhibitor, 1400W (1 μM, 30 min) and 20-HETE synthesis inhibitor, HET0016 (0.1 μM, 30 min).

*vs. ACh control conditions

avs. Cu6.5

bvs. Cu0 (p ≤ 0.05, two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test).

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; Emax, maximal response; pD2, potency.

Discussion

Oxidative stress is a state characterized by the excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), as a result of an imbalance between the intensity of oxidative mechanisms and the counteractive defense systems. Prolonged oxidative stress may lead to cell injury, especially oxidation of proteins, carbohydrates and lipids [25]. The assessment of the intensity of oxidative stress allows to determine the degree of cell damage and related disorders. Oxidative stress is considered to be the main cause of atherosclerosis, diabetes, cataract, asthma, cancer, neurodegenerative and autoimmune diseases [26]. The evaluation of oxidative stress intensity is more often based on compounds formed as a result of the reaction of free radicals with components of organism cells, because each of the oxidizing substances causes the formation of characteristic markers, including specific modifications of proteins or reaction by-products [27].

In case of proteins, the markers of their damage are the products of their oxidation, which are formed as a result of oxidative stress. Among the substances which have the ability to oxidize proteins are: hydroperoxides, hypochlorite, bromic acid and reducing metals, e.g. iron and copper. The most important protein oxidation reactions include nitration of cyclic amino acid residues, oxidation of thiol groups (-SH), oxidation of cysteine and methionine residues, or formation of carbonyl derivatives of some amino acids. However, in case of lipids, the markers of their damage are the products of lipid peroxidation, which contribute to changes in the physical properties of cell membranes. Polar peroxides, ketones, aldehydes and hydroxyl polar groups are introduced to phospholipids inside the double lipid layer, which decreases the lipid hydrophobicity of cell membranes and changes the organization of the double lipid layer. As a result, these changes lead to abnormal lipid asymmetry of the membranes.

In our study, three various assays (lipid peroxidation, plasma protein thiol groups and carbonyl determination) have been used to study the antioxidant properties of Cu supplemented and Cu deficient diets. Our results revealed differences in the antioxidant properties between tested diets. We presented that the oral administration of the typically reported 6.5 mg/kg NP and ionic Cu increased the marker of lipid peroxidation in blood plasma (increased TBARS). Moreover, we also demonstrated that ionic Cu had stronger pro-oxidative effect on proteins than nano Cu (reflected as decreased plasma free thiol groups and increased protein carbonylation/oxidation), see Fig 7.

Fig 7. A summary of the results.

Fig 7

20-HETE is produced by ω-hydroxylases of the cytochrome P450 in the vascular wall. This increases smooth muscle tone indirectly as a result of its metabolism by COX in endothelial cells [28,29]. Incubation with the 20-HETE synthesis inhibitor, HET0016, did not influence the vasodilation induced by ACh in aortic rings of Cu supplemented rats, discounting the participation of the 20-HETE derivate in this response. Meanwhile, enhanced vasodilation was observed in arteries from copper deprived rats, which suggest the participation of this arachidonic acid metabolite in vascular response in this group, see Fig 7.

ACh-induced NO release by endothelial cells is a muscarinic receptor-mediated effect, whereas the calcium ionophore A23187 response, is a receptor-independent endothelial mechanism. In our study, A23187 induced a concentration-dependent relaxation of aortic rings from nano Cu and ionic Cu supplemented rats, however to a greater extent in Cu6.5 fed rats, which is opposite to the response described for ACh in corresponding groups of rats.

These results suggest that the possible site for nano Cu to interfere with endothelium-dependent relaxation is due to the activation of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the endothelial cells, with subsequent Ca2+ release, and it may also occur downstream of the receptors in the bioavailability of endothelial NO.

Reduced relaxation to A23187 was also observed in Cu deficient rats, and has been described previously in streptozotocin- [30] and MSG-induced diabetic rats [31]; as well as in renal hypertensive rats [32].

During the 8 weeks of experimental feeding, the vascular response to cGMP analogue was similar in the nano Cu and Cu deficient group. Meanwhile, in the Cu6.5 supplemented rats, the relaxant response was potentiated. This points toward alterations of the vasodilator effect of cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG) signaling cascade in NP6.5 and Cu0 rats. The observed results might be explained by the fact that soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) activity and cGMP-dependent protein kinase expression have been previously shown to be negatively regulated by proinflammatory mediators [33,34].

Nitric oxide (NO) stimulates sGC activity, and the upregulation of either iNOS or sGC activity represents an early compensatory mechanism to counteract the effects of induced oxidative stress [35].

We observed, that the specific iNOS inhibitor (1400W), reduced the ACh-induced vasodilation in nano Cu rats to the level observed in Cu deficient rats, and that 1400W did not modify this response in Cu6.5 fed animals. This may point to the overproduction of NO from iNOS in nano Cu fed rats and may support the above described attenuated vasodilation to 8-bromo-cGMP, as the response to proinflammatory mediators.

Another interesting finding is that the exogenous CO donor, CORM-2, similar to NO and ACh response, enhanced the vasodilation of isolated arteries in nano Cu. However, the vascular response to the CO donor was more significant compared to that of ACh. CO is able to stimulate only four-fold sGC with subsequent cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) production [36], meanwhile NO stimulates sGC activity 200-fold [37], indicating that CO-induced accumulation of cGMP involves additional cellular components.

Another mechanism of CORM-2 involves the activation of Ca2+-dependent potassium channels (BKCa). However, previously we did not observe any changes induced by the BKCa channel opener, NS 1619, between the two Cu supplemented groups [6].

CO has an inhibitory effect on numerous proteins including cytochrome P450 [15], so it may constitute one of the mechanism responsible for the regulation of vascular response. However participation of 20-HETE derivate has been already ruled out. It’s worth mentioning that an oral exposure to nano Cu is able to affect drug metabolism by inhibiting the expression of various CYP450 enzymes in the liver [5].

CORM-2 is also a modulator of voltage-gated calcium channels [36], and Cu has been described previously as a modulator of these channels [38]. However, the interaction between CORM-2 and nano Cu, as well as the influence on calcium channels has not been undertaken in this manuscript and requires further studies, see Fig 7 for summary of the results.

It’s worth mentioning that both resveratrol and fish oil supplementation had different physiological effects in the nano Cu group of rats compared to ionic Cu [19,39] which have only shown how complex are the observed different effects between these two forms of copper.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that dietary nano Cu and Cu carbonate increase lipid peroxidation (TBARS). However, nano Cu supplementation has different physiological effect towards protein oxidation, which is reflected in an increase in thiols and decrease in carbonyl groups.

Moreover, both nano Cu and carbonate enhance vasodilation to ACh, CORM-2 and A23187, meanwhile supplementation with Cu carbonate enhances vasodilation to 8-bromo-cGMP.

In addition, we provide evidence that although nano Cu may increase NO production through increased iNOS activity, the cGMP/PKG signaling cascade is downregulated, which could diminish the enhanced iNOS activation. Moreover, the 20-HETE-mediated signaling pathway is not involved in a vascular regulation of Cu supplemented rats.

This study demonstrates that supplementation with nano Cu influences oxidative stress which modifies the response of rat thoracic arteries.

Supporting information

S1 File. Highlights.

(DOCX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The work was supported in part by the Medical University of Olsztyn, Poland, Statutory funding, grant No.61.610.001-110 (MM). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Majewski M, Kozlowska A, Thoene M, Lepiarczyk E, Grzegorzewski WJ. Overview of the role of vitamins and minerals on the kynurenine pathway in health and disease. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2016; 67: 3–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Majewski M, Kasica N, Jakimiuk A, Podlasz P. Toxicity and cardiac effects of acute exposure to tryptophan metabolites on the kynurenine pathway in early developing zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2018; 341: 16–29. 10.1016/j.taap.2018.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang T, Yu WG, Powell WS. Formation of monohydroxy derivatives of arachidonic acid, linoleic acid, and oleic acid during oxidation of low density lipoprotein by copper ions and endothelial cells. J Lipid Res. 1992; 33: 525–537. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cao Y. The Toxicity of Nanoparticles to Human Endothelial Cells. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018; 1048, 59–69. 10.1007/978-3-319-72041-8_4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tang H, Xu M, Shi F, Ye G, Lv C, Luo J, et al. Effects and Mechanism of Nano-Copper Exposure on Hepatic Cytochrome P450 Enzymes in Rats. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19: 2140 10.3390/ijms19072140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Majewski M, Ognik K, Juśkiewicz J. Copper nanoparticles modify the blood plasma antioxidant status and modulate the vascular mechanisms with nitric oxide and prostanoids involved in Wistar rats. Pharmacol Rep. 2019; 71(3): 509–516. 10.1016/j.pharep.2019.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Majewski M, Ognik K, Juśkiewicz J. Copper nanoparticles enhance vascular contraction induced by prostaglandin F2-alpha and decrease the blood plasma cu-zn ratio in Wistar rats. Journal of Elementology. 2019; 24(3): 911–922. 10.5601/jelem.2019.24.1.1813 (B) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sharma AK, Kumar A, Sahu M, Sharma G, Datusalia AK, Rajput SK. Exercise preconditioning and low dose copper nanoparticles exhibits cardioprotection through targeting GSK-3β phosphorylation in ischemia/reperfusion induced myocardial infarction. Microvasc Res. 2018; 120: 59–66. 10.1016/j.mvr.2018.06.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sharma AK, Kumar A, Taneja G, Nagaich U, Deep A, Datusalia AK, et al. Combined and individual strategy of exercise generated preconditioning and low dose copper nanoparticles serve as superlative approach to ameliorate ISO-induced myocardial infarction in rats. Pharmacol Rep. 2018; 70: 789–795 10.1016/j.pharep.2018.02.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sharma AK, Kumar A, Taneja G, Nagaich U, Deep A, Rajput SK. Synthesis and preliminary therapeutic evaluation of copper nanoparticles against diabetes mellitus and -induced micro- (renal) and macro-vascular (vascular endothelial and cardiovascular) abnormalities in rats. RSC Adv. 2016; 6: 36870–36880. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cholewińska E, Ognik K, Fotschki B, Zduńczyk Z, Juśkiewicz J. Comparison of the effect of dietary copper nanoparticles and one copper (II) salt on the copper biodistribution and gastrointestinal and hepatic morphology and function in a rat model. PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0197083 10.1371/journal.pone.0197083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ognik K, Cholewińska E, Juśkiewicz J, Zduńczyk Z, Tutaj K, Szlązak R. The effect of copper nanoparticles and copper (II) salt on redox reactions and epigenetic changes in a rat model. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2019; 103(2): 675–686. 10.1111/jpn.13025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nowak P, Olas B, Wachowicz B. Oxidative stress in haemostasis. Postepy Biochemii. 2010; 3, 239–247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shimokawa H. Hydrogen peroxide as an endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor. Pflugers Arch. 2010; 459: 915–922. 10.1007/s00424-010-0790-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Adach W, Olas B. Carbon monoxide and its donors—their implications for medicine. Future Med Chem. 2017; 11: 61–73. 10.4155/fmc-2018-0215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Toth P, Csiszar A, Sosnowska D, Tucsek Z, Cseplo P, Springo Z, et al. Treatment with the cytochrome P450 ω-hydroxylase inhibitor HET0016 attenuates cerebrovascular inflammation, oxidative stress and improves vasomotor function in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Br J Pharmacol. 2013; 168: 1878–1888. 10.1111/bph.12079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Majewski M, Ognik K, Zdunczyk P, Juskiewicz J. Effect of dietary copper nanoparticles versus one copper (II) salt: Analysis of vasoreactivity in a rat model. Pharmacol Rep. 2017; 69: 1282–1288. 10.1016/j.pharep.2017.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tomaszewska E, Muszyński S, Ognik K, Dobrowolski P, Kwiecień M, Juśkiewicz J, et al. Comparison of the effect of dietary copper nanoparticles with copper (II) salt on bone geometric and structural parameters as well as material characteristics in a rat model. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2017; 42: 103–110. 10.1016/j.jtemb.2017.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Majewski M, Ognik K, Juskiewicz J. The antioxidant status, lipid profile, and modulation of vascular function by fish oil supplementation in nano-copper and copper carbonate fed Wistar rats. J Funct Foods. 2019; 64 10.1016/j.jff.2019.103595 (D) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wachowicz B. Adenine nucleotides in thrombocytes of birds. Cell Bioch Fun. 1984; 2: 167–170. 10.1002/cbf.290020310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bartosz B. Druga twarz tlenu. PWN, Warszawa. 2008; 17: 99–120. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Levine RL, Garland D, Oliver CN, Amici A, Climent I, Lenz AG, et al. Determination of carbonyl content in oxidatively modified proteins. Meth Enzymol. 1990; 186: 464–478. 10.1016/0076-6879(90)86141-h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ando Y, Steiner M. Sulphydryl and disulphide groups of platelet membranes. I. Determination of disulphide groups. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973; 311: 26–37. 10.1016/0005-2736(73)90251-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ando Y, Steiner M. Sulphydryl and disulphide groups of platelet membranes. II. Determination of sulphydryl groups. Biochim Biophys. Acta. 1973; 311: 38–44. 10.1016/0005-2736(73)90252-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Karolkiewicz J. Wpływ stresu oksydacyjnego na strukturę i funkcje komórek oraz konsekwencje wynikające z uszkodzeń wolnorodnikowych–związek z procesami starzenia. Gerontologia Polska. 2011; 19: 59–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Grosicka-Maciag E. Biologiczne skutki stresu oksydacyjnego wywołanego działaniem pestycydow. Postepy Hig Med Dosw. 2011; 65: 357–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ho E, Galougahi KK, Liu CC, Bhindi R, Figtree GA. Biological markers of oxidative stress: Applications to cardiovascular research and practice. Redox Biol. 2013; 1: 483–491. 10.1016/j.redox.2013.07.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Escalente B, Sessa WC, Falck JR, Yadagiri P, Schwartzman M. Vasoactivity of 20-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid is dependent on metabolism by cyclooxygenase. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1989; 248: 229–232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Blanco-Rivero J, Márquez-Rodas I, Xavier FE, Aras-López R, Arroyo-Villa I, Ferrer M, et al. Long-term fenofibrate treatment impairs endothelium-dependent dilation to acetylcholine by altering the cyclooxygenase pathway. Cardiovasc Res. 2007; 75: 398–407. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2007.03.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shi Y, So KF, Man RY, Vanhoutte PM. Oxygen-derived free radicals mediate endothelium-dependent contractions in femoral arteries of rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Br J Pharmacol. 2007; 152(7): 1033–1041. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Majewski M, Jurgoński A, Fotschki B, Juśkiewicz J. The toxic effects of monosodium glutamate (MSG)—The involvement of nitric oxide prostanoids and potassium channels in the reactivity of thoracic arteries in MSG-obese rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2018; 359: 62–69. 10.1016/j.taap.2018.09.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Oliveira AP, Lunardi CN, Rodrigues GJ, Bendhack LM. Relaxation induced by calcium ionophore is impaired in carotid arteries from 2K-1C rats due to failed effect of nitric oxide on the smooth muscle cells. Vascul Pharmacol. 2009; 50(5–6): 153–159. 10.1016/j.vph.2008.11.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Browner NC, Sellak H, Lincoln TM. Downregulation of cGMP-dependent protein kinase expression by inflammatory cytokines in vascular smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004; 287: 88–96. 10.1152/ajpcell.00039.2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sagredo A, del Campo L, Martorell A, Navarro R, Martín MC, Blanco-Rivero J, et al. Ovariectomy increases the participation of hyperpolarizing mechanisms in the relaxation of rat aorta. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e73474 10.1371/journal.pone.0073474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shah MR, Wedgwood S, Czech L, Kim GA, Lakshminrusimha S, Schumacker PT, et al. Cyclic stretch induces inducible nitric oxide synthase and soluble guanylate cyclase in pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2013; 14: 4334–4348. 10.3390/ijms14024334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Decaluwé K, Pauwels B, Verpoest S, Van de Voorde J. Divergent mechanisms involved in CO and CORM-2 induced vasorelaxation. Eur J Pharmacol. 2012; 674: 370–377. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ma X, Sayed N, Beuve A, Van Den Akker F. NO and CO differentially activate soluble guanylyl cyclase via a heme pivot-bend mechanism. EMBO Journal. 2007; 26(2): 578–588. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Neumaier F, Akhtar-Schäfer I, Lüke JN, Dibué-Adjei M, Hescheler J, Schneider T. Reciprocal modulation of Cav 2.3 voltage-gated calcium channels by copper(II) ions and kainic acid. J Neurochem. 2018; 147: 310–322. 10.1111/jnc.14546 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Majewski M, Ognik K, Juśkiewicz J. The interaction between resveratrol and two forms of copper as carbonate and nanoparticles on antioxidant mechanisms and vascular function in Wistar rats. Pharmacol Rep. 2019; 71(5): 862–869. 10.1016/j.pharep.2019.03.011 (C) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Michael Bader

11 Dec 2019

PONE-D-19-30444

Copper nanoparticles and carbonate influence the markers of oxidative stress and potentiate vasodilation of thoracic aorta in supplemented Wistar rats

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr Majewski,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Both reviewers suggest partial rewriting of the manuscript.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Jan 25 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Michael Bader

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements:

  1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

  2. To comply with PLOS ONE submissions requirements, please provide methods of sacrifice in the Methods section of your manuscript.

  3.  

    We noticed minor instances of text overlap with your previous publication, which need to be addressed:

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharep.2019.02.007

    In your revision please ensure you cite all your sources (including your own works), and quote or rephrase any duplicated text outside the methods section. Further consideration is dependent on these concerns being addressed.

  4.  

     Thank you for including your ethics statement: All procedures were approved by the Local Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments (Permission Number: 65/2017) according to European Union guidelines (Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments) and conform to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH Publications No. 86–26, revised 2014). All surgery was performed under sodium pentobarbital anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize animal suffering.

    Please amend your current ethics statement to include the full name of the ethics committee that approved your specific study.

    For additional information about PLOS ONE submissions requirements for ethics oversight of animal work, please refer to http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-animal-research  

    Once you have amended this/these statement(s) in the Methods section of the manuscript, please add the same text to the “Ethics Statement” field of the submission form (via “Edit Submission”).

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The study presents the influence of Copper nanoparticles and carbonate on oxidative stress and potentiate vasodilation of thoracic aorta in supplemented Wistar rats.

Title itself is not convincing

Conclusion of the study as mentioned in abstract indicates authors need to put extra efforts

English language and grammar is not appropriate. Few sentences itself starting form ‘because’ which is just an example.

How Sample size of the study is derived need to be mentioned

Purpose of the study is not convincing, neither the conclusions derived from the study.

Manuscript should be re-written with specific outcomes.

Reviewer #2: This study investigated the effects of Cu NPs and CuCO3 on oxidative stress and vasodilation of aorta as well as the possible mechanisms. The study is well-designed and performed, and reported some interesting data. I have some comments that may further improve the manuscript.

1. In the title, "supplemented Wistar rats" is very unclear. I recommend the authors to revise the title to make it more clear and straightforward.

2. Please make a conclusion at the end of abstract. The statement "Our findings show that CuNPs possess different biological properties" is not specific enough.

3. The authors stated in the introduction what they are going to do and the reasons to test these endpoints. This is good. However, since the authors wrote two aims and different mechanisms, it is very difficult for the readers to follow all the points. Therefore, I suggest the authors make a figure about the study design. This figure should also include what are the molecules to mediate the effects, and the actions of all chemicals used in this study.

4. Please state where you bought all the chemicals, including the NPs. Also, although the authors bought Cu NPs, it is still necessary to characterize them. At least, the authors should do TEM/SEM, and measure the hydrodynamic size/zeta potential in suspensions. I looked at the authors' previous study (pharmacological reports), but they did not characterize the NPs.

5. The authors compared the effects of Cu NPs and CuCO3. Pleast state (1) why should the comparison be necessary; (2) through the comparison, what conclusions could be made?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Yi Cao

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Feb 21;15(2):e0229282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229282.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


25 Jan 2020

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf

and

I did check and it is in accordance with plos one

http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf I did check and it is in accordance with plos one

2. To comply with PLOS ONE submissions requirements, please provide methods of sacrifice in the Methods section of your manuscript. Rats were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine+xylazine [100 mg/kg+10 mg/kg body weight (BW)] and killed by decapitation. Immediately after blood collection, samples were kept in tubes containing heparin + EDTA as an anticoagulant. Samples were centrifuged at 3,000 g for 10 min and blood plasma was separated and stored at –80 °C until further analysis.

3.

We noticed minor instances of text overlap with your previous publication, which need to be addressed:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharep.2019.02.007

In your revision please ensure you cite all your sources (including your own works), and quote or rephrase any duplicated text outside the methods section. Further consideration is dependent on these concerns being addressed. I did rephrase

4.

Thank you for including your ethics statement: All procedures were approved by the Local Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments in Olsztyn, Poland (Permission Number: 65/2017) according to European Union guidelines (Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments) and conform to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH Publications No. 86–26, revised 2014). The 3R rule (“Replacement, Reduction and Refinement”) was respected in the study. All surgery was performed under ketamine+xylazine anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize animal suffering.

For additional information about PLOS ONE submissions requirements for ethics oversight of animal work, please refer to http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-animal-research

Once you have amended this/these statement(s) in the Methods section of the manuscript, please add the same text to the “Ethics Statement” field of the submission form (via “Edit Submission”).

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: The study presents the influence of Copper nanoparticles and carbonate on oxidative stress and potentiate vasodilation of thoracic aorta in supplemented Wistar rats.

Title itself is not convincing: Title changed: now it is: Dietary supplementation with copper nanoparticles influences the markers of oxidative stress and modulates vasodilation of thoracic arteries in young Wistar rats

Conclusion of the study as mentioned in abstract indicates authors need to put extra efforts

English language and grammar is not appropriate. Few sentences itself starting form ‘because’ which is just an example. ‘because’ was changed -

the manuscript was checked by the native English speaker (from US) previously

How Sample size of the study is derived need to be mentioned Sample size - base on my previous studies with n=9, previously the sample size was calculated based on Statistical algorithms developed by Columbia University Medical Center (www.biomath.info).

Purpose of the study is not convincing, neither the conclusions derived from the study.

Manuscript should be re-written with specific outcomes. Manuscript was re-written;

the conclusions was re-written “In conclusion, this study demonstrates that supplementation with nano Cu influences oxidative stress, which further do modify the vascular response”

Reviewer #2: This study investigated the effects of Cu NPs and CuCO3 on oxidative stress and vasodilation of aorta as well as the possible mechanisms. The study is well-designed and performed, and reported some interesting data. I have some comments that may further improve the manuscript.

1. In the title, "supplemented Wistar rats" is very unclear. I recommend the authors to revise the title to make it more clear and straightforward. Dietary supplementation with copper nanoparticles influences the markers of oxidative stress and modulates vasodilation of thoracic arteries in young Wistar rats

2. Please make a conclusion at the end of abstract. The statement "Our findings show that CuNPs possess different biological properties" is not specific enough. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that supplementation with nano Cu influences oxidative stress, which further do modify the vascular response.

3. The authors stated in the introduction what they are going to do and the reasons to test these endpoints. This is good. However, since the authors wrote two aims and different mechanisms, it is very difficult for the readers to follow all the points. I have improved the aims and mechanisms

Therefore, I suggest the authors make a figure about the study design. This figure should also include what are the molecules to mediate the effects, and the actions of all chemicals used in this study. Figure was made

4. Please state where you bought all the chemicals, including the NPs. Also, although the authors bought Cu NPs, it is still necessary to characterize them. At least, the authors should do TEM/SEM, and measure the hydrodynamic size/zeta potential in suspensions. I looked at the authors' previous study (pharmacological reports), but they did not characterize the NPs. The nano Cu particles (40-60 nm size nanopowder, 12 m2/g) were purchased from Sky Spring Nanomaterials, Inc. (Houston, TX, US), with a purity of 99.9% on a trace metals basis, with a spherical morphology of 0.19 g/cm3 bulk density, and an 8.9 g/cm3 true density. The zeta potential of NPs was determined to be −30.3 mV (phosphate-buffered saline), for more details see Ognik et al [12].

5. The authors compared the effects of Cu NPs and CuCO3. Pleast state (1) why should the comparison be necessary it is necessary to see the difference in lipids and proteins peroxidation; We aimed to study the physiological effects of diet supplemented with copper (Cu) nanoparticles (NPs) so does comparison is necessary.

(2) through the comparison, what conclusions could be made?

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that dietary nano Cu and Cu carbonate increase lipid peroxidation (TBARS). However, nano Cu supplementation has different physiological effect towards protein oxidation, which is reflected in an increase in thiols and decrease in carbonyl groups.

Moreover, both nano Cu and carbonate enhance vasodilation to ACh, CORM-2 and A23187, meanwhile supplementation with Cu carbonate enhances vasodilation to 8-bromo-cGMP.

In addition, we provide evidence that although nano Cu may increase NO production through increased iNOS activity, the cGMP/PKG signaling cascade is downregulated, which could diminish the enhanced iNOS activation. Moreover, the 20-HETE-mediated signaling pathway is not involved in a vascular regulation of Cu supplemented rats.

This study demonstrates that supplementation with nano Cu influences oxidative stress which modifies the response of rat thoracic arteries.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response.docx

Decision Letter 1

Michael Bader

4 Feb 2020

Dietary supplementation with copper nanoparticles influences the markers of oxidative stress and modulates vasodilation of thoracic arteries in young Wistar rats

PONE-D-19-30444R1

Dear Dr. Majewski,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Michael Bader

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: Yes: Yi Cao

Acceptance letter

Michael Bader

13 Feb 2020

PONE-D-19-30444R1

Dietary supplementation with copper nanoparticles influences the markers of oxidative stress and modulates vasodilation of thoracic arteries in young Wistar rats

Dear Dr. Majewski:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Michael Bader

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Highlights.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES