Skip to main content
PMC home page
Oncology Letters logoLink to Oncology Letters
. 2020 Jan 8;19(3):1751–1758. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11270

Overexpression of miR-206 in osteosarcoma and its associated molecular mechanisms as assessed through TCGA and GEO databases

Xiongfeng Xu 1, Bo Qiu 1,✉, Peng Yi 1, Huajie Li 1
PMCID: PMC7039051  PMID: 32194668

Abstract

Osteosarcoma (OS) is a primary malignant bone tumor that predominantly occurs in adolescents. Different types of OS tumor are highly malignant, associated with a poor prognosis and are invasive with blood-vessel dissemination characteristics, thus affected patients are prone to early lung metastasis. MicroRNAs (miRNAs/miR) are small non-coding RNA molecules that act as oncogenes or tumor suppressors during tumor development. The present study investigated the role of miR-206 in OS development. Bioinformatics analysis demonstrated that miR-206 was upregulated in OS and thus may serve as a risk factor for cancer prognosis. Subsequently, in response to miR-206 overexpression, differentially expressed genes were screened and analyzed using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery, Gene Ontology enrichment analysis, the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways and protein-protein interaction network construction, in order to identify key miR-206 targets. The results demonstrated that high miR-206 expression inhibited OS cell proliferation, which was associated with a good patient prognosis. Thus, miR-206 may serve as a potential target for OS treatment, in order to improve early disease diagnosis.

Keywords: osteosarcoma, microRNA-206, bioinformatics analysis, differentially expressed genes, survival analysis

Introduction

In the United States, osteosarcoma (OS) is a highly prevalent primary bone tumor, which accounted for 0.2% of all human solid tumor malignancies from 1973 to 2004 (1). OS includes metaphysis of the proximal tibia, distal femur and other long tubular bones (2). Despite recent development of novel adjuvant chemotherapy techniques and surgical methods, which have increased the 5-year survival rate for OS to ~70% (3), OS mortality and metastasis rates remain high (4). Regardless of the identification of several anticancer drugs and tumor suppressors, the underlying molecular mechanisms in OS tumorigenesis remain unclear (5,6).

MicroRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) are a class of endogenous small non-coding RNAs that directly bind to the 3′-untranslated region (UTR) of target mRNAs and regulate gene expression (7). An increasing number of studies have reported that miRNA expression profiles are altered in various cancer cells and tissues, suggesting their value as biomarkers for cancer and targets for therapy (8,9).

miR-206 has been demonstrated to play vital roles in different types of cancer. For example, miR-206 is a well-known tumor suppressor in human breast cancer, which regulates estrogen receptor-α expression during normal breast epithelial cell development (10). Furthermore, miR-206 has been reported in ovarian (11), gastric (12,13), colorectal (14), laryngeal (15), cervical (16), lung (17) and liver (18) cancer. The present study investigated miR-206 expression levels in both primary and metastatic OS tissues compared with normal tissues, in order to determine whether miR-206 has the potential to serve as a biomarker for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with OS.

Materials and methods

Data sources

Datasets were retrieved from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo). A total of 224 datasets were downloaded and screened, and common gene expression profiles were selected from the GSE65071 (19). The GSE65071 dataset, published in January 2015 and based on the GPL 19631 platform (G-U133A) (http://www.exiqon.com/mirna-pcr-panels) Exiqon human V3 miRNA PCR panel I+II, includes data from 15 normal controls and 20 patients with OS (10 primary OS and 10 metastatic OS).

A total of 64 datasets were retrieved from the GEO database in order to identify target OS genes. The data regarding the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were obtained from the GSE89074 dataset (Han et al unpublished data). Gene expression profiles of two OS cell lines with miR-206 overexpression, two empty vector controls and two normal control cell lines were selected from the GSE89074 dataset. The GSE89074 dataset was published in October 2016 and based on the GPL570 platform [HG-U133_Plus_2] Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array chip data (Affymetrix; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).

Screening the DEGs

GEO2R (20) was used to analyze the data from the miRNA expression profiles of selected OS cell lines and the DEGs derived from miR-206 overexpression. GEO2R is a web-based tool based on the limma R package (version 3.10; http://www.bioconductor.org). DEGs in OS were screened, with P<0.05 and |log fold-change (FC)|>1 set as the threshold values. DEGs from the primary OS and normal control cell lines were screened, as well as the metastatic OS and normal control cells lines, and DEGs sets of the two groups were obtained. A Venn diagram was used to cross DEGs between the two groups, and the intersecting genes were considered to be OS-associated.

Functional annotation of DEGs

The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID; http://david.ncifcrf.gov) was used to perform functional and pathway enrichment analyses. DAVID is a systematic and integrative functional annotation tool that allows researchers to unravel the biological meaning behind large lists of genes (21). Gene Ontology analysis, including the cellular component (CC), molecular function (MF) and biological process (BP) (22), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis (23) were performed for the upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Protein-protein interaction (PPI)

The Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING; http://string-db.org) is a biological database and web resource (24), which was used to construct a PPI network of the DEGs. Based on the STRING database, PPIs of DEGs were selected with scores ≥0.9 (highest confidence), and the PPI networks were visualized using Cytoscape software (version 3.6.1; http://cytoscape.org).

Screening the hub genes

A plugin cyto-Hubba (version 3.6.1) (25) analysis was performed within Cytoscape to detect hub genes with the strongest interactions between other genes (26). A total of 10 genes with high degree scores were identified and selected in the PPI network.

Survival analysis in Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA)

Following collection of the research subjects from The Cancer Genome Atlas (https://www.cancer.gov/about-nci/organization/ccg/research/structural-genomics/tcga), the online database, GEPIA (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn) was used to assess the association between gene expression and prognosis (27). The effect of the genes on the prognosis of patients with OS was evaluated and key genes that influence OS prognosis were screened. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Dataset validation

The association between the expression levels of the five key genes and pulmonary metastasis of osteosarcoma was validated using the GSE14359 dataset within the GEO database.

Results

Screening for differentially expressed miRNAs

miRNAs differentially expressed in the primary OS tissues were screened within the GSE65071 dataset. A total of 277 differentially expressed miRNAs were identified, of which 66 were downregulated and 211 were upregulated. miRNAs differentially expressed in the OS tissues with lung metastasis were subsequently screened, which identified 265 differentially expressed miRNAs (58 downregulated and 207 upregulated). A total of 253 differentially expressed miRNAs were identified (Fig. 1). Previous studies have highlighted miR-206 as an important cancer-associated miRNA (28,29); however, to the best of our knowledge, its role in OS development following upregulation in OS tissues has not yet been investigated. The results of the present study demonstrated that miR-206 expression was increased in both the primary OS tissues and metastatic OS tissues compared with normal tissues, respectively. The difference was statistically significant in both cases (P<0.001; Fig. 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Differentially expressed genes between primary OS and metastatic tumors compared with normal tissues in the GSE65071 dataset. OS, osteosarcoma.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

miR-206 expression in each sample of the GSE65071 dataset. ***P<0.001 vs. normal. miR-206, microRNA-206; Normal, normal tissue; Primary, primary OS; Metastatic, metastatic OS; OS, osteosarcoma.

Screening for DEGs in cells overexpressing miR-206 within the GSE89074 dataset

A total of 2,057 DEGs were obtained from cells overexpressing miR-206, including 1,540 upregulated and 517 downregulated genes. All DEGs are presented in the volcanic map (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Volcano plot presenting the differentially expressed genes in osteosarcoma cells overexpressing microRNA-206 in the GSE89074 dataset. Red, upregulated genes; green, downregulated genes; black, no significant differences.

Enrichment analysis

Functional pathway enrichment analysis was performed for the DEGs that were upregulated and downregulated in response to miR-206 overexpression. Functional enrichment analysis demonstrated that the upregulated genes were significantly enriched in 127 BPs, 65 CCs and 34 MFs. Subsequently, the present study identified the 10 most significantly enriched BPs, CCs and MFs in the upregulated genes (Fig. 4). Conversely, functional enrichment analysis demonstrated that the downregulated genes were significantly enriched in 152 BPs, 16 CCs and 44 MFs. Fig. 5 indicates the 10 most significantly enriched BPs, CCs and MFs in the downregulated genes.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

Enrichment analysis of the upregulated genes in the top 10 BPs, CCs and MFs. BP, biological process; CC, cell composition; MF, molecular function. The length of the histogram represents a significant degree of enrichment.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Open in a new tab

Enrichment analysis of the downregulated genes in the top 10 BPs, CCs and MFs. BP, biological process; CC, cell composition; MF, molecular function.

Analysis of KEGG pathways

The present study analyzed signal pathway enrichment of the DEGs in cells overexpressing miR-206. The upregulated genes were notably enriched in 32 signaling pathways, of which 10 were associated with OS (Fig. 6; Table I). The downregulated genes were notably enriched in 35 signaling pathways, of which 10 were associated with OS (Fig. 7; Table II).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Open in a new tab

Top 10 most significantly enriched signaling pathways for the miR-206 upregulated genes.

Table I.

A total of 10 enriched signaling pathways for microRNA-206 upregulated genes.

Term Signaling pathway Count P-value
hsa05146 Amoebiasis 20 9.64×10−6
hsa04510 Focal adhesion 28 5.83×10−5
hsa05205 Proteoglycans in cancer 26 5.72×10−4
hsa05200 Pathways in cancer 38 2.44×10−3
hsa04110 Cell cycle 16 5.55×10−3
hsa05222 Small cell lung cancer 12 1.01×10−2
hsa04151 PI3K-Akt 32 1.04×10−2
hsa04919 Thyroid hormone 14 1.62×10−2
hsa04068 FoxO 15 2.42×10−2
hsa04310 Wnt 15 3.02×10−2
Open in a new tab
Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Open in a new tab

Top 10 most significantly enriched signaling pathways for the miR-206 downregulated genes.

Table II.

A total of 10 enriched signaling pathways for microRNA-206 downregulated genes.

Term Signaling pathway Count P-value
hsa04010 MAPK 27 1.05×10−7
hsa04630 JAK-STAT 15 4.50×10−5
hsa04620 Toll-like receptor 12 6.78×10−4
hsa04668 TNF 10 2.79×10−3
hsa04064 NF-κB 8 1.02×10−2
hsa04151 PI3K-Akt 18 1.50×10−2
hsa04014 Ras 13 2.31×10−2
hsa05206 MicroRNAs in cancer 15 2.76×10−2
hsa04068 FoxO 9 3.26×10−2
hsa04115 p53 6 3.78×10−2
Open in a new tab

Network maps and hub gene screening

A total of 1,540 upregulated and 517 downregulated DEGs were uploaded onto STRING to obtain the PPI data. Samples with PPI scores ≥0.9 were selected to construct the PPI network. The PPI network of the upregulated genes consisted of 1,129 nodes and 1,862 edges (Fig. 8). The central nodes of this network were as follows: IL6, FOS, JUN, IRF7, EGR1, OAS1, OAS2, MX1, XAF1 and IFIT3 (Fig. 9). The PPI network of the downregulated genes consisted of 144 nodes and 545 edges (Fig. 10). The central nodes of this network were as follows: PDGFB, NEK2, CHEK1, CCNB1, RBBP4, ANAPC4. HACE1, FBXL5, HERC2 and VPRBP (Fig. 11).

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Open in a new tab

Protein-protein interaction network of the upregulated genes.

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Open in a new tab

Upregulated hub genes in the protein-protein interaction network. The different colors represent the difference in significance of the hub genes, in terms of their degree of connectivity. An increased shade gradient indicates a more notable association with other genes.

Figure 10.

Figure 10.

Open in a new tab

Protein-protein interaction network of the downregulated genes.

Figure 11.

Figure 11.

Open in a new tab

Downregulated hub genes in the protein-protein interaction network. The different colors represent the difference in significance of the hub genes, in terms of their degree of connectivity. An increased shade gradient indicates a more notable association with other genes.

Survival analysis

The association between the upregulated and downregulated genes, and the survival of patients with OS was analyzed. A total of five genes (CCNB1, CHEK1, IL6, NEK2 and RBBP4) demonstrated a significant prognostic value. Progression-free survival (PFS) time of patients with high CCNB1 expression was lower than those with low CCNB1 expression (Fig. 12A). Furthermore, PFS (Fig. 12B) and overall survival time (Fig. 12D) were lower in patients with high CHEK1 expression than those with low CHEK1 expression. Similarly, PFS (Fig. 12C) and overall survival time (Fig. 12F) were lower in patients with high NEK2 expression than those with low NEK2 expression. Overall survival time of patients with high RBBP4 expression was lower than those with low RBBP4 expression (Fig. 12G); however, overall survival of patients with high IL6 expression was higher than those with low IL6 expression (Fig. 12E).

Figure 12.

Figure 12.

Figure 12.

Open in a new tab

Kaplan-Meier survival curves. (A-C) Progression-free survival analysis with high and low expression levels of CCNB1, CHEK1 and NEK2. (D-G) Overall survival analysis with high and low expression levels of CHEK1, IL6, NEK2 and RBBP4. HR, hazard ratio.

Dataset validation

The present study validated the association between gene expression and OS type, in primary OS or pulmonary metastasis of OS, using the GSE14359 dataset (30) within the GEO database. The dataset contained 10 OS samples with pulmonary metastasis and 8 primary OS samples. The mRNA expression levels of the five genes were upregulated in OS lung metastasis compared with primary OS (Fig. 13), with the largest upregulation difference in NEK2 (Log2 FC, 2.28639273; P=2.12×10−3), and the smallest upregulation difference in RBBP4 (Log2 FC, 0.69641798; P=1.81×10−2). Similarly, increased expression levels of CCNB1 (Log2 FC, 1.85398694; P=1.99×10−3), CHEK1 (Log2 FC, 1.13599575; P=7.20×10−3) and IL6 (Log2 FC, 1.23455773; P=4.49×10−3) were observed in OS lung metastasis compared with primary OS. The results suggest that the five genes identified for their prognostic value are closely associated with the metastasis and prognosis of OS.

Figure 13.

Figure 13.

Open in a new tab

Expression levels of the five key genes in primary OS and OS lung metastasis in the GSE14359 dataset. **P<0.05. OS, osteosarcoma; metastasis: Metastatic OS of the lung; primary, primary OS.

Discussion

Increasing evidence demonstrates the role of miRNAs in OS tumorigenesis and tumor development (31,32). miRNAs and their target genes represent potential novel therapeutic biomarkers for OS (33,34). Previous studies have reported downregulated miR-206 expression in OS cells (35–38). However, miR-206 expression was demonstrated to be upregulated in human OS tissues in the present study. A possible reason for the discrepancies observed may be due to the opposing roles miR-206 plays at different stages of OS occurrence and development. For example, miR-206 expression was downregulated in the plasma of patients with early OS, while expression was upregulated in advanced OS. The databases screened in the present study contained data from plasma samples of patients with advanced OS.

miR-206 is transcribed by RNA polymerase II to produce pri-miRNA transcripts (pri-miR-206). Pre-miR-206 precursors with stem-ring structures are produced by processing pri-miR-206 in the nucleus with the RNA endonuclease III, Drosha. Subsequently, the pri-miR-206 is transported to the cytoplasm by the Exportin-5 protein, and further processed by the secondary RNA endonuclease III, Dicer, in order to produce mature double-stranded RNA molecules. One of the mature strands is inserted into the RNA-induced silencing complex, which binds to the 3′-UTRs of target genes and cleaves target RNAs (39). miR-206 has been reported to inhibit the expression of multiple target genes, which are also regulated by multiple miRNAs (40).

The identification of target genes is critical to understanding the role of miRNAs during tumorigenesis (41). In the present study, overexpression of miR-206 resulted in downregulation of the CCNB1 and NEK2 genes, and upregulation of the IL6 gene. CCNB1 is associated with mitosis (42), whereby its aberrant cell cycle regulation is a major cause of excessive cell proliferation and tumorigenesis (43). CCNB1 is closely associated with tumor progression, where its overexpression in tumor cells and tissues leads to uncontrolled phosphorylation and dysregulation of the maturation promotion factor (MPF). The MPF is activated following DNA damage and the affected cells progress through mitosis, proliferating to form different types of tumor (44). Thus, the CCNB1 gene is considered an oncogene and tumor antigen (45). The present study constructed a PPI network map and analyzed key genes, which demonstrated that CCNB1 was downregulated in OS tissue. It is believed that CCNB1 may play a role in the occurrence and development of OS as an anti-oncogene, which can be targeted for the treatment of OS.

Previous studies have demonstrated that NEK2 expression is upregulated in several types of human cancer, including non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) (46,47), myeloma (48), ovarian cancer (49), breast cancer (50,51), prostate cancer (52), colorectal cancer (53), malignant peripheral neurilemmoma (54), renal cell carcinoma (50) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (55), compared with the corresponding normal tissues. NEK2 mediates the separation of chromosomes into two daughter cells by regulating centrosome separation and spindle formation. Aberrant NEK2 expression is associated with unregulated cell division through the premature separation of immature centrosomes, abnormal spindle formation, excessive centrosome duplication and abnormal chromosome segregation, these abnormalities promote chromosome aneuploidy and instability, aberrant NEK2 expression is believed to be a key driving force for cellular deterioration in cancer (48). The present study demonstrated that NEK2 expression was downregulated in OS tissues, thus it may serve as an anti-oncogene that can be targeted for OS prevention and treatment.

The Janus kinase 2/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (JAK2/STAT3) signaling pathway is one of the major signaling pathways by which IL6 exerts its biological effects (56). The results of the present study demonstrated that the JAK-STAT signaling is significantly enriched in downregulated genes. The occurrence and development of several types of human tumor are closely associated with abnormal IL6 expression (57). Furthermore, a previous study confirmed the role of miR-206 and IL6 in NSCLC via STAT3 signaling (58).

IL6 promotes tumor cell proliferation and angiogenesis by inducing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, promoting the expansion and recruitment of myeloid inhibitory cells, altering the inherent biological characteristics of tumor cells and optimizing the external growth environment of several types of tumor (59). IL6 activates STAT3 in OS cells, promoting proliferation and migration. STAT3 activation stimulates the expression of genes associated with cell proliferation, anti-apoptosis, hypoxia, metastasis and angiogenesis (60). These genes include CCND1, cell division cycle protein 2, B-cell lymphoma 2, hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α, heat shock protein 90 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (61). STAT3 signaling plays an important role in OS progression. LLL12, a STAT3 inhibitor, notably inhibits the expression of VEGF, matrix metallopeptidase 9 and fibroblast growth factor-1 in OS cells, effectively hindering angiogenesis in vivo and in vitro (62). Furthermore, LLL12 promotes OS cell apoptosis and simultaneously impairs cell adhesion and migration. In addition, OS growth in nude mice is markedly inhibited (63). As IL6 promotes OS development via STAT3 signaling, it has the potential to be used as a target for the prevention and treatment of OS.

The present study confirmed that miR-206 is highly expressed in OS. miR-206 promotes OS development by regulating target gene networks via specific signaling pathways. The potential target genes and biological function of miR-206 provide novel insight into the DEGs of OS. Overall, the results indicate that miR-206 may be used as a novel target for the early diagnosis and treatment of OS.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Glossary

Abbreviations

BP

biological process

MF

molecular function

CC

cellular component

Funding

The present study was funded by The National Science and Technology Support Project (grant no. 2015BCA316) and The Science and Technology Program (grant no. 2016060101010045).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during the present study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

XX performed the literature research, collated the data and drafted the initial manuscript. BQ made substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of data. In addition BQ was involved in drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content. HL acquired the data and PY performed the analysis and interpreted the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Mirabello L, Troisi RJ, Savage SA. Osteosarcoma incidence and survival rates from 1973 to 2004: Data from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program. Cancer. 2009;115:1531–1543. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tang J, Shen L, Yang Q, Zhang C. Overexpression of metadherin mediates metastasis of osteosarcoma by regulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cell Prolif. 2014;47:427–434. doi: 10.1111/cpr.12129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kansara M, Teng MW, Smyth MJ, Thomas DM. Translational biology of osteosarcoma. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14:722–735. doi: 10.1038/nrc3838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Konings AW, Hettinga JV, Kampinga HH. Osteosarcoma in adolescents and young adults: New developments and controversies. Thermal chemosensitization of cDDP-resistant cells. Cancer Treat Res. 1993;62:93–100. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-3518-8_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McQueen P, Ghaffar S, Guo Y, Rubin EM, Zi X, Hoang BH. The Wnt signaling pathway: Implications for therapy in osteosarcoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2011;11:1223–1232. doi: 10.1586/era.11.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wu CL, Tsai HC, Chen ZW, Wu CM, Li TM, Fong YC, Tang CH. Ras activation mediates WISP-1-induced increases in cell motility and matrix metalloproteinase expression in human osteosarcoma. Cell Signal. 2013;25:2812–2822. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2013.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ameres SL, Zamore PD. Diversifying microRNA sequence and function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14:475–488. doi: 10.1038/nrm3611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tutar L, Tutar E, Özgür A, Tutar Y. Therapeutic targeting of microRNAs in cancer: Future perspectives. Drug Dev Res. 2015;76:382–388. doi: 10.1002/ddr.21273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Di Leva G, Croce CM. miRNA profiling of cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2013;23:3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2013.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li Y, Hong F, Yu Z. Decreased expression of microRNA-206 in breast cancer and its association with disease characteristics and patient survival. J Int Med Res. 2013;41:596–602. doi: 10.1177/0300060513485856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Guo R, Wu Q, Liu F, Wang Y. Description of the CD133+ subpopulation of the human ovarian cancer cell line OVCAR3. Oncol Rep. 2011;25:141–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yang Q, Zhang C, Huang B, Li H, Zhang R, Huang Y, Wang J. Downregulation of microRNA-206 is a potent prognostic marker for patients with gastric cancer. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;25:953–957. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32835ed691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ren J, Huang HJ, Gong Y, Yue S, Tang LM, Cheng SY. MicroRNA-206 suppresses gastric cancer cell growth and metastasis. Cell Biosci. 2014;4:26. doi: 10.1186/2045-3701-4-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vickers MM, Bar J, Gorn-Hondermann I, Yarom N, Daneshmand M, Hanson JE, Addison CL, Asmis TR, Jonker DJ, Maroun J, et al. Stage-dependent differential expression of microRNAs in colorectal cancer: Potential role as markers of metastatic disease. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2012;29:123–132. doi: 10.1007/s10585-011-9435-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang T, Liu M, Wang C, Lin C, Sun Y, Jin D. Down-regulation of MiR-206 promotes proliferation and invasion of laryngeal cancer by regulating VEGF expression. Anticancer Res. 2011;31:3859–3863. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Song G, Zhang Y, Wang L. MicroRNA-206 targets notch3, activates apoptosis, and inhibits tumor cell migration and focus formation. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:31921–31927. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.046862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mataki H, Seki N, Chiyomaru T, Enokida H, Goto Y, Kumamoto T, Machida K, Mizuno K, Nakagawa M, Inoue H. Tumor-suppressive microRNA-206 as a dual inhibitor of MET and EGFR oncogenic signaling in lung squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oncol. 2015;46:1039–1050. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yunqiao L, Vanke H, Jun X, Tangmeng G. MicroRNA-206, down-regulated in hepatocellular carcinoma, suppresses cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014;61:1302–1307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Allen-Rhoades W, Kurenbekova L, Satterfield L, Parikh N, Fuja D, Shuck RL, Rainusso N, Trucco M, Barkauskas DA, Jo E, et al. Cross-species identification of a plasma microRNA signature for detection, therapeutic monitoring, and prognosis in osteosarcoma. Cancer Med. 2015;4:977–988. doi: 10.1002/cam4.438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Barrett T, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Evangelista C, Kim IF, Tomashevsky M, Marshall KA, Phillippy KH, Sherman PM, Holko M, et al. NCBI GEO: Archive for functional genomics data sets-update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D991–D995. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dennis GJ, Jr, Sherman BT, Hosack DA, Yang J, Gao W, Lane HC, Lempicki RA. DAVID: Database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery. Genome Biol. 2003;4:P3. doi: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-5-p3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gene Ontology Consortium: The gene ontology (GO) project in 2006. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D322–D326. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:27–30. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Szklarczyk D, Morris JH, Cook H, Kuhn M, Wyder S, Simonovic M, Santos A, Doncheva NT, Roth A, Bork P, et al. The STRING database in 2017: Quality-controlled protein-protein association networks, made broadly accessible. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D362–D368. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chin CH, Chen SH, Wu HH, Ho CW, Ko MT, Lin CY. cytoHubba: Identifying hub objects and sub-networks from complex interactome. BMC Syst Biol. 2014;8(Suppl 4):S11. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-8-S4-S11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13:2498–2504. doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tang Z, Li C, Kang B, Gao G, Li C, Zhang Z. GEPIA: A web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:W98–W102. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li S, Li Y, Wen Z, Kong F, Guan X, Liu W. microRNA-206 overexpression inhibits cellular proliferation and invasion of estrogen receptor α-positive ovarian cancer cells. Mol Med Rep. 2014;9:1703–1708. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2014.2123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang X, Ling C, Bai Y, Zhao J. MicroRNA-206 is associated with invasion and metastasis of lung cancer. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2011;294:88–92. doi: 10.1002/ar.21287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fritsche-Guenther R, Noske A, Ungethüm U, Kuban RJ, Schlag PM, Tunn PU, Karle J, Krenn V, Dietel M, Sers C. De novo expression of EphA2 in osteosarcoma modulates activation of the mitogenic signalling pathway. Histopathology. 2010;57:836–850. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03713.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Xu H, Liu X, Zhao J. Down-regulation of miR-3928 promoted osteosarcoma growth. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2014;33:1547–1556. doi: 10.1159/000358718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Novello C, Pazzaglia L, Cingolani C, Conti A, Quattrini I, Manara MC, Tognon M, Picci P, Benassi MS. miRNA expression profile in human osteosarcoma: Role of miR-1 and miR-133b in proliferation and cell cycle control. Int J Oncol. 2013;42:667–675. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2012.1717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jones KB, Salah Z, Del Mare S, Galasso M, Gaudio E, Nuovo GJ, Lovat F, LeBlanc K, Palatini J, Randall RL, et al. miRNA signatures associate with pathogenesis and progression of osteosarcoma. Cancer Res. 2012;72:1865–1877. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lian F, Cui Y, Zhou C, Gao K, Wu L. Identification of a plasma four-microRNA panel as potential noninvasive biomarker for osteosarcoma. PLoS One. 2015;10:e121499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Georges S, Calleja LR, Jacques C, Lavaud M, Moukengue B, Lecanda F, Quillard T, Gabriel MT, Cartron PF, Baud'huin M, et al. Loss of miR-198 and −206 during primary tumor progression enables metastatic dissemination in human osteosarcoma. Oncotarget. 2018;9:35726–35741. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.26284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pan BL, Tong ZW, Wu L, Pan L, Li JE, Huang YG, Li SD, Du SX, Li XD. Effects of MicroRNA-206 on osteosarcoma cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion by targeting ANXA2 through the AKT signaling pathway. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;45:1410–1422. doi: 10.1159/000487567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bao YP, Yi Y, Peng LL, Fang J, Liu KB, Li WZ, Luo HS. Roles of microRNA-206 in osteosarcoma pathogenesis and progression. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14:3751–3755. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.6.3751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhan FB, Zhang XW, Feng SL, Cheng J, Zhang Y, Li B, Xie LZ, Deng QR. MicroRNA-206 reduces osteosarcoma cell malignancy in vitro by targeting the PAX3-MET axis. Yonsei Med J. 2019;60:163–173. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.2.163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Huang Y, Shen XJ, Zou Q, Wang SP, Tang SM, Zhang GZ. Biological functions of microRNAs: A review. J Physiol Biochem. 2011;67:129–139. doi: 10.1007/s13105-010-0050-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lim LP, Lau NC, Garrett-Engele P, Grimson A, Schelter JM, Castle J, Bartel DP, Linsley PS, Johnson JM. Microarray analysis shows that some microRNAs downregulate large numbers of target mRNAs. Nature. 2005;433:769–773. doi: 10.1038/nature03315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhang Y, Yang P, Wang XF. Microenvironmental regulation of cancer metastasis by miRNAs. Trends Cell Biol. 2014;24:153–160. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2013.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Porter LA, Cukier IH, Lee JM. Nuclear localization of cyclin B1 regulates DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Blood. 2003;101:1928–1933. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-04-1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Warner SL, Bearss DJ, Han H, Von Hoff DD. Targeting Aurora-2 kinase in cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2003;2:589–595. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Egloff AM, Vella LA, Finn OJ. Cyclin B1 and other cyclins as tumor antigens in immunosurveillance and immunotherapy of cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66:6–9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kao H, Marto JA, Hoffmann TK, Shabanowitz J, Finkelstein SD, Whiteside TL, Hunt DF, Finn OJ. Identification of cyclin B1 as a shared human epithelial tumor-associated antigen recognized by T cells. J Exp Med. 2001;194:1313–1323. doi: 10.1084/jem.194.9.1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhong X, Guan X, Liu W, Zhang L. Aberrant expression of NEK2 and its clinical significance in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol Lett. 2014;8:1470–1476. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.2396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhong X, Guan X, Dong Q, Yang S, Liu W, Zhang L. Examining Nek2 as a better proliferation marker in non-small cell lung cancer prognosis. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:7155–7162. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-1935-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zhou W, Yang Y, Xia J, Wang H, Salama ME, Xiong W, Xu H, Shetty S, Chen T, Zeng Z, et al. NEK2 induces drug resistance mainly through activation of efflux drug pumps and is associated with poor prognosis in myeloma and other cancers. Cancer Cell. 2013;23:48–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Liu X, Gao Y, Lu Y, Zhang J, Li L, Yin F. Upregulation of NEK2 is associated with drug resistance in ovarian cancer. Oncol Rep. 2014;31:745–754. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lee J, Gollahon L. Nek2-targeted ASO or siRNA pretreatment enhances anticancer drug sensitivity in triple-negative breast cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2013;42:839–847. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2013.1788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lee J, Gollahon L. Mitotic perturbations induced by Nek2 overexpression require interaction with TRF1 in breast cancer cells. Cell Cycle. 2013;12:3599–3614. doi: 10.4161/cc.26589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zeng YR, Han ZD, Wang C, Cai C, Huang YQ, Luo HW, Liu ZZ, Zhuo YJ, Dai QS, Zhao HB, et al. Overexpression of NIMA-related kinase 2 is associated with progression and poor prognosis of prostate cancer. BMC Urol. 2015;15:90. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0085-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Neal CP, Fry AM, Moreman C, McGregor A, Garcea G, Berry DP, Manson MM. Overexpression of the Nek2 kinase in colorectal cancer correlates with beta-catenin relocalization and shortened cancer-specific survival. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:828–838. doi: 10.1002/jso.23717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Stricker TP, Henriksen KJ, Tonsgard JH, Montag AG, Krausz TN, Pytel P. Expression profiling of 519 kinase genes in matched malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor/plexiform neurofibroma samples is discriminatory and identifies mitotic regulators BUB1B, PBK and NEK2 as overexpressed with transformation. Mod Pathol. 2013;26:930–943. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ning Z, Wang A, Liang J, Liu J, Zhou T, Yan Q, Wang Z. Abnormal expression of Nek2 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A novel marker for prognosis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7:2462–2469. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Garbers C, Aparicio-Siegmund S, Rose-John S. The IL-6/gp130/STAT3 signaling axis: Recent advances towards specific inhibition. Curr Opin Immunol. 2015;34:75–82. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2015.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hong DS, Angelo LS, Kurzrock R. Interleukin-6 and its receptor in cancer: Implications for translational therapeutics. Cancer. 2007;110:1911–1928. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yang Y, Wang W, Chang H, Han Z, Yu X, Zhang T. Reciprocal regulation of miR-206 and IL-6/STAT3 pathway mediates IL6-induced gefitinib resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23:7331–7341. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chang Q, Daly L, Bromberg J. The IL-6 feed-forward loop: A driver of tumorigenesis. Semin Immunol. 2014;26:48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2014.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Alvarez JV, Greulich H, Sellers WR, Meyerson M, Frank DA. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 is required for the oncogenic effects of non-small-cell lung cancer-associated mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor. Cancer Res. 2006;66:3162–3168. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bournazou E, Bromberg J. Targeting the tumor microenvironment: JAK-STAT3 signaling. JAKSTAT. 2013;2:e23828. doi: 10.4161/jkst.23828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Bid HK, Oswald D, Li C, London CA, Lin J, Houghton PJ. Anti-angiogenic activity of a small molecule STAT3 inhibitor LLL12. PLoS One. 2012;7:e35513. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Onimoe GI, Liu A, Lin L, Wei CC, Schwartz EB, Bhasin D, Li C, Fuchs JR, Li PK, Houghton P, et al. Small molecules, LLL12 and FLLL32, inhibit STAT3 and exhibit potent growth suppressive activity in osteosarcoma cells and tumor growth in mice. Invest New Drugs. 2012;30:916–926. doi: 10.1007/s10637-011-9645-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during the present study are included in this published article.

Articles from Oncology Letters are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES