Skip to main content
Oncology Letters logoLink to Oncology Letters
. 2020 Jan 17;19(3):2295–2305. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11316

Integrated bioinformatics analysis of the association between apolipoprotein E expression and patient prognosis in papillary thyroid carcinoma

Qunguang Jiang 1,*, Wenqian Feng 2,*, Chengfeng Xiong 3, Yunxia Lv 3,
PMCID: PMC7039105  PMID: 32194729

Abstract

The prognosis of most patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is excellent despite some cases of tumor progression or relapse. The present study was designed to reveal possible prognostic risk indicators for PTC. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) extracted from 4 Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) cohorts were subjected to functional enrichment analyses by Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome (KEGG) pathway analysis. A dataset from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) was obtained to filter and validate significant genes using cytoHubba, followed by analysis of their association with clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis. In total, 240 DEGs were identified after data preprocessing. These DEGs were enriched in ‘intracellular redox equilibrium’, ‘release of exosome’, ‘cell adhesion’, ‘regulation of extracellular matrix’, ‘collagen binding’ and ‘energy metabolism’ based on GO analysis which including cellular component, molecular function and biological process. KEGG pathway analysis revealed that the DEGs were enriched in thyroid hormone synthesis, pathways in cancer, focal adhesion, metabolic pathways, apoptosis, PPAR signaling pathway and PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Using cytoHubba, the following hub genes were identified: Apolipoprotein E (APOE); hemoglobin subunit α1 (HBA1); angiotensin II receptor 1 (AGTR1); collagen I α1 (COL1A1); galectin 3 (LGALS3) and TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 1 (TIMP1). The expression of these genes was found to be consistent in TCGA datasets. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that APOE was significantly associated with overall survival (P=0.00067) and disease free survival (P=0.00220). Additionally, low expression of APOE was significantly associated with older age (P<0.001) and higher TNM stage (P<0.001) compared with the high expression group. Therefore, APOE may function as a predictive risk indicator for progression as well as prognosis of PTC.

Keywords: Gene Expression Omnibus, The Cancer Genome Atlas, papillary thyroid cancer, prognosis

Introduction

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is one of the most prevalent thyroid malignancies; the morbidity and mortality ranks ninth and sixth, respectively, with 567,000 new cases diagnosed and 41,000 cancer-related deaths in 2018, worldwide (1). In recent years, the widespread application of thyroid ultrasonography and ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration has improved the diagnosis of PTC in an asymptomatic population (2). Most patients have PTC that is curable, with a 5-year survival rate >95%. However, a few cases of PTC might occur with invasive features such as tumor recurrence, cervical lymph node involvement and/or distant metastasis, which are associated with poor prognosis (3,4). Therefore, biomarkers that can predict poor outcomes are urgently needed as these would assist clinicians in taking early and appropriate measures for optimal therapeutic benefit.

Current studies have indicated the involvement of various molecular events in the deterioration of PTC (5,6), including BRAF and RAS mutations, rearrangements of RET protooncogene and the excessive activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathway (710). To date, multiple microRNAs (miRs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been identified as potential molecular biomarkers, including miR-146b-5p and lncRNA HOTTIP, which have been confirmed to participate in the invasion and metastasis of PTC (1114). Nevertheless, the majority of these findings are derived from preclinical studies, and large-scale studies of prognostic biomarkers of PTC are lacking.

The development of bioinformatic analysis and the emergence of public database sorting have facilitated the identification of prognostic biomarkers of multiple types of cancer based on large cohorts, including kinesin family member 4A for colorectal cancer (15), miR-106a in breast cancer (16) and kirre-like nephrin family adhesion molecule 1 in melanoma (17). In the present study, the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (18) was used to mine differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between PTC tissues and adjacent normal tissues of PTC. Subsequently, multiple bioinformatics methods, including Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome (KEGG) enrichment analysis, construction of a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and network topological analysis were employed to identify hub genes in DEGs which potentially related to the initiation and progression of PTC. In addition, association of the expression of hub genes with prognosis as well as clinical stage of patients with PTC was validated using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and survival analysis.

Materials and methods

Microarray data

In total, 4 gene expression datasets of PTC [GSE3678 and GSE3467 (19), GSE60542 (20), and GSE97001 (21)] were downloaded from the GEO database. The GSE3678 dataset contained 7 PTC samples and 7 paired adjacent normal thyroid tissues. The GSE3467 dataset was comprised of 9 PTC samples and 9 paired adjacent normal thyroid tissues. The GSE60542 dataset included 33 PTC samples and 29 paired adjacent normal thyroid tissues. GSE97001 was composed of 4 PTC samples and 4 paired adjacent normal thyroid tissues.

DEG analysis

The R language limma package (version 3.4.2) (22) (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/limma.html) was used to analyze the DEGs among samples. The adjusted P<0.05 and |log2fold change|>1 were taken as the cut-off values. Subsequently, the 4 expression datasets were integrated using the Robust Rank Aggregation (RRA) method (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RankAggreg/RankAggreg.pdf).

GO and KEGG enrichment analyses of DEGs

To assess the potential molecular mechanisms of DEGs in PTC, the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) online tool (23) was utilized for GO analysis (24) to annotate genes and to define the functions of DEGs into 3 domains: Cellular component, biological process and molecular function. Subsequently, KEGG enrichment analysis was conducted to understand the signaling pathways in which DEGs genes were involved (25).

PPI network construction and topological analysis

The DEG-related PPI network was established using the STRING database (26), followed using visualization by Cytoscape software (version 3.6.1; http://github.com/cytoscape/cytoscape/releases/3.6.1/). Significant genes in the network were subsequently filtered using the Cytoscape plugin cytoHubba (27), which sorts the nodes in the network in accordance with the topological parameters of each node. The hub genes were selected from the intersection of the top 55 DEGs from 12 algorithms by cytoHubba (28).

Validation of DEGs and association with clinicopathological characteristics using a TGCA dataset

Clinical data and RNA-sequencing data on patients with thyroid cancer were downloaded from TCGA database (29). There were 510 thyroid cancer (THCA) samples and 58 normal samples in the TCGA-THCA cohort. Pathological classifications of non-papillary carcinoma specimens were first excluded, and samples with pathological parameters and follow-up data remained, leaving 493 patients with PTC and 58 normal thyroid samples. Additionally, the expression value of the RNA sequencing data, downloaded as transcripts per million (TPM), was analyzed. The coexpression network of hub genes was identified base on STRING network and CytoScape software was in cBioportal (http://www.cbioportal.org/).

Statistical analysis

R software version 3.4.2 (R Foundation) or GraphPad Prism version 7.0 software (GraphPad, Inc.) were used for statistical analysis. The differential expression of hub genes between normal and PTC tissue were analysed using the Wilcoxon test, and the Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test were used for survival analysis of hub genes. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. The ‘Survminer’ package (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survminer/index.html) for R was applied to determine the optimal cut-off value to divide patients into 2 groups based on either high or low gene expression, based on receiver operating characteristic. Pearson's χ2 test or Fisher's exact test were employed to determine the association between DEGs and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with PTC. Moreover, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated using the R package survival (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survival/index.html). The cut-off value of significant GO terms and KEGG pathway was P<0.05. Univariate Cox proportional hazard models were utilized to explore the prognostic value of the significant DEGs. Subsequently, multivariate Cox regression was used for the identification of independent predictors of PTC.

Results

Identification of DEGs between PTC and paracancerous tissue A total of 4 datasets were identified in the GEO database: GSE3678, GSE3467, GSE60542 and GSE97001

The characteristics of these studies are presented in Table I. A total of 134 upregulated genes and 106 downregulated genes were identified using the RRA method. The top 50 most significantly upregulated and downregulated genes are clustered in a heatmap (Fig. 1).

Table I.

Characteristics of the four GEO datasets.

GEO ID Platform Normal samples, n Tumor samples, n
GSE3678 GPL570 7 7
GSE3467 GPL570 9 9
GSE60542 GPL570 29 33
GSE97001 GPL10332 4 4

GEO, Gene Expression Omnibus.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Identification of DEGs in the papillary thyroid carcinoma mRNA expression profiling datasets GSE3678, GSE3467, GSE60542 and GSE97001. The top 50 most significantly upregulated and downregulated DEGs were clustered in a heatmap. Red represents higher expression and green represents lower expression. The values represented are logFC values. DEGs, differentially expressed genes; FC, fold change.

Pathway enrichment analysis using GO and KEGG

GO is considered as the international standard classification system for gene function. A total of 240 DEGs were identified. As shown in Fig. 2A, ‘Cellular oxidant detoxification’, ‘extracellular exosome’, ‘cell adhesion’, ‘extracellular matrix’, ‘collagen binding’ and ‘protease binding’ was enrichment based on GO analysis. KEGG analysis was undertaken using the DAVID tool, which revealed the most significantly enriched pathways included thyroid hormone synthesis, pathways in cancer, focal adhesion, metabolic pathways, apoptosis and the PPAR and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways in KEGG (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

GO terms and KEGG pathways enriched by DEGs. The y-axes correspond to the (A) GO terms or (B) KEGG pathways, and the x-axes show the enrichment factor. The color of the dot represents the P-value, and the size of the dot represents the number of DEGs mapped to the reference GO terms or pathways. DEGs, differentially expressed genes; GO, gene ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome.

PPI network analysis

A PPI network of DEGs was first constructed using the STRING database, followed by data visualization by Cytoscape (Fig. 3A). To further mine the significant nodes in the network, topological analysis of each node was performed using the Cytoscape plugin cytoHubba. The 6 most significant genes identified in the PPI network were apolipoprotein E (APOE), hemoglobin subunit α1 (HBA1), angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AGTR1), collagen type I α1 (COL1A1), galectin 3 (LGALS3) and TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 1 (TIMP1). The co-expression network of these 6 hub genes based on the TCGA-THCA cohort dataset was constructed using the cBioportal tool (http://www.cbioportal.org/) (Fig. 3B).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

PPI network construction and topological analysis. (A) PPI network of differentially expressed genes. Red stands for upregulated genes, while green stands for downregulated genes. (B) Topological analysis of each node showing the genes in the context of biological interactions derived from public pathway databases. Dots with black borders represent significant genes in the PPI network. The arrows represent direction in signaling pathways. PPI, protein-protein interaction.

Verification of the association of 6 hub genes with prognosis for patients with PTC

A total of 493 patients with PTC and 58 normal thyroid samples were identified in the TCGA-THCA dataset. To validate the reliability of the 6 significant genes identified in the GEO database, the expression level of these genes was assessed in the TCGA database by including 493 PTC samples and 58 normal thyroid tissues. As shown in Fig. 4, the expression trends of these genes were in line with previous GEO analysis (Fig. 1). To identify the association between the 6 hub genes and prognosis for patients with PTC, samples from the TCGA database were further categorized into high and low expression groups. As shown in Fig. 5, the expression levels of 4 genes, APOE, COL1A1, LGALS3 and TIMP1, were significantly associated with OS. As shown in Fig. 6, all 6 significant genes were associated with DFS in patients with PTC. Among these genes, APOE had the most significant association with OS (P=0.00067) and DFS (P=0.00220), suggesting that APOE may play a critical role in PTC progression and is significantly associated with prognosis.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Relative mRNA expression level of hub genes in the TCGA cohort. To compare the expression of (A) APOE, (B) HBA1, (C) AGTR1, (D) COL1A1, (E) LGALS3 and (F) TIMP1 genes in papillary thyroid carcinoma (red) and normal tissues (blue). Statistical differences were analyzed using the Wilcoxon test. ****P<0.0001. APOE, apolipoprotein E; HBA1, hemoglobin subunit α1; AGTR1, angiotensin II receptor 1; COL1A1, collagen type I α1; LGALS3, galectin 3; TIMP1, TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 1; TPM, transcripts per kilobase million.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the association between hub gene expression level and OS in patients with PTC. Differences in OS in PTC patients with high and low expression of (A) APOE, (B) HBA1, (C) AGTR1, (D) COL1A1, (E) LGALS3 and (F) TIMP1. PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; OS, overall survival; APOE, apolipoprotein E; HBA1, hemoglobin subunit α1; AGTR1, angiotensin II receptor 1; COL1A1, collagen type I subunit α1; LGALS3, galectin 3; TIMP1, TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 1.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the association between significant gene expression and DFS in patients with PTC. Differences in DFS in PTC patients with high and low expression of (A) APOE, (B) HBA1, (C) AGTR1, (D) COL1A1, (E) LGALS3 and (F) TIMP1. PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; DFS, disease-free survival; APOE, apolipoprotein E; HBA1, hemoglobin subunit α1; AGTR1, angiotensin II receptor 1; COL1A1, collagen type I α1; LGALS3, galectin 3; TIMP1, TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 1.

Association between APOE expression and clinicopathological features of patients with PTC

To further demonstrate the importance of APOE in PTC and patient prognosis, the association of APOE expression with clinicopathological features of patients with PTC was analyzed using the TCGA dataset. As presented in Table II, low expression of APOE was significantly associated with older age (P<0.001) and more advanced TNM stage (P<0.001). The results revealed that gender, lymph node involvement, distant metastasis and cancer multifocality were not significantly associated with APOE expression. Finally, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses were conducted. As shown in Table III, univariate analysis revealed that the mRNA expression of APOE (P=0.002) was closely associated with TNM stage (P=0.001), while multivariate analysis suggested that APOE could be an independent prognostic factor for patients with PTC.

Table II.

Association between the expression of APOE and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.

APOE expression

Variables Low, n (%) High, n (%) P-value
Cases 246 (49.89) 247 (50.10)
Age, years <0.001
  <45 88 (35.77) 133 (53.85)
  ≥45 158 (64.23) 114 (46.15)
Sex 0.663
  Male 179 (72.76) 184 (74.49)
  Female 67 (27.24) 63 (25.51)
T stage <0.001
  T1+T2 134 (54.47) 171 (69.80)
  T3+T4 112 (45.53) 74 (30.20)
Lymph node metastasis 0.728
  N0 111 (51.87) 115 (50.22)
  N1 103 (48.13) 114 (40.78)
Distant metastasis 0.833
  M0 133 (97.08) 144 (96.64)
  M1 4 (2.92) 5 (3.36)
TNM stage <0.001
  I+II 144 (58.78) 182 (61.79)
  III+IV 101 (41.22) 64 (38.21)
Multifocality 0.491
  Unifocal 135 (56.02) 128 (52.89)
  Multifocal 106 (43.98) 114 (47.11)

APOE, apolipoprotein E; TNM, tumor node metastasis.

Table III.

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of APOE.

Univariate Multivariate


Variables HR 95% CI P-value HR 95% CI P-value
Age, <45 vs. ≥45 years 1.417 0.786–2.554 0.246
Gender, female vs. male 2.038 0.737–5.643 0.170
TNM stage, I+II vs. III+IV 7.142 2.298–22.194 0.001 6.211 1.542–25.007 0.010
T, T1+T2 vs. T3+T4 3.052 1.058–8.805 0.039 0.866 0.227–3.229 0.833
N, N0 vs. N1 1.455 0.475–4.459 0.512
M, M0 vs. M1 4.179 0.892–19.571 0.070
Multifocality, unifocal vs. multifocal 0.431 0.213–0.872 0.770
APOE expression high vs. low 0.211 0.079–0.568 0.002 0.286 0.102–0.797 0.017

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; APOE, apolipoprotein E; TNM, tumor node metastasis.

Discussion

PTC is the most prevalent malignancy in the endocrine system, with a rapid increase in morbidity rate in past two decades (1). Despite the relatively good 5-year survival rate of patients with PTC, tumor recurrence and lymph node metastasis are common, which might impact the OS and DFS of patients with PTC (30,31).

In the present study, DEGs between neoplastic and adjacent tissues of PTC were analyzed using the GEO database. Consequently, 134 upregulated and 106 downregulated DEGs were identified. GO and KEGG enrichment analysis, establishment of PPI network and network topological analysis were utilized to identify genes potentially related to the initiation and development of PTC. It can be hypothesized that most of the DEGs identified in the present study were enriched in multiple cancer initiation and development-related pathological processes and signaling pathways based on GO and KEGG enrichment analysis from previous research (3237). Recent evidence from network biology suggests that genes and proteins do not function in isolation. Instead, they function in interconnected pathways and molecular networks on multiple levels (38). In a previous study the properties and behavior of biological molecules were also identified using the PPI network, suggesting this is an important tool (39).

In total, 6 significant hub genes were identified among the DEGs: APOE, HBA1, AGTR1, COL1A1, LGALS3 and TIMP1. Of these 6 genes, HBA1, AGTR1, COL1A1 and TIMP1 have previously been reported to participate in the pathogenesis, development, malignant transformation and pathological process of PTC, and they have been significantly associated with patient survival and prognosis (4043). These previous studies have confirmed the reliability and accuracy of the bioinformatic mining results in the present study.

APOE is a well-known apolipoprotein that functions in lipoprotein-mediated lipid transport between organs via the plasma and interstitial fluids (44). As a secreted protein, APOE has been implicated in lipoprotein metabolism and the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease and atherosclerosis (4547). However, its association with tumors has rarely been reported. In recent years, an additional role of APOE has been identified in the pathogenesis of tumor metastasis (48,49). APOE can inhibit the invasiveness of melanoma cells and the recruitment of endothelial cells, potentially functioning as a vital barrier to metastatic colonization (50,51). APOE has also been demonstrated to be involved in innate immune modulation, which could be a target to enhance the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy in patients (52). Moreover, the abnormal expression of APOE in lung, colorectal and gastric cancer has been reported (5356); however, the association between APOE and PTC has not been investigated and should be the basis of future research.

At present, the association of the expression of numerous genes with the survival of patients with PTC is increasingly being mined. The majority of present studies are validated in animal tumor models, in vitro cell models or small-scale clinical studies (57,58). However, large-scale studies with more comprehensive analysis and larger cohorts are required due to the complexity of PTC. Fortunately, the rapid development of genome-wide sequencing has led to the development of publicly-available high-throughput tumor databases such as GEO and TCGA, which have made it possible to conduct bioinformatic analysis of large datasets of patients with PTC.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by the Youth Fund of the Second Affiliated Hospital to Nanchang University (grant no. 2016YNQN12026) and the Young and Middle-aged Doctor Research Project of the Thyroid Gland from China Health Promotion Foundation and the Natural Science Foundation in China (grant nos. 81660294,.81560397 and 81660403, respectively).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the present study are available in the Gene Expression Omnibus repository (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and The Cancer Genome Atlas repository (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/).

Authors' contributions

YXL and QGJ designed the study. QGJ and WQF collected and analyzed the data. YXL drafted, wrote and critically revised the manuscript. CFX analyzed the data. YXL critically revised the manuscript. All authors had intellectual input into the study and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Xing M, Haugen BR, Schlumberger M. Progress in molecular-based management of differentiated thyroid cancer. Lancet. 2013;381:1058–1069. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60109-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rusinek D, Pfeifer A, Krajewska J, Oczko-Wojciechowska M, Handkiewicz-Junak D, Pawlaczek A, Zebracka-Gala J, Kowalska M, Cyplinska R, Zembala-Nozynska E, et al. Coexistence of TERT promoter mutations and the BRAF V600E alteration and its impact on histopathological features of papillary thyroid carcinoma in a selected series of polish patients. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:E2647. doi: 10.3390/ijms19092647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kwak HY, Chae BJ, Eom YH, Hong YR, Seo JB, Lee SH, Song BJ, Jung SS, Bae JS. Does papillary thyroid carcinoma have a better prognosis with or without Hashimoto thyroiditis? Int J Clin Oncol. 2015;20:463–473. doi: 10.1007/s10147-014-0754-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Selmansberger M, Feuchtinger A, Zurnadzhy L, Michna A, Kaiser JC, Abend M, Brenner A, Bogdanova T, Walch A, Unger K, et al. CLIP2 as radiation biomarker in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Oncogene. 2015;34:3917–3925. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Liu Z, Cai J, Yu Y, Fang H, Si Y, Jankee JJ, Shen M. Tumor abnormal protein as a novel biomarker in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Clin Lab. 2017;63:479–485. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2016.160903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Giordano TJ, Kuick R, Thomas DG, Misek DE, Vinco M, Sanders D, Zhu Z, Ciampi R, Roh M, Shedden K, et al. Molecular classification of papillary thyroid carcinoma: Distinct BRAF, RAS, and RET/PTC mutation-specific gene expression profiles discovered by DNA microarray analysis. Oncogene. 2005;24:6646–6656. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ciampi R, Knauf JA, Kerler R, Gandhi M, Zhu Z, Nikiforova MN, Rabes HM, Fagin JA, Nikiforov YE. Oncogenic AKAP9-BRAF fusion is a novel mechanism of MAPK pathway activation in thyroid cancer. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:94–101. doi: 10.1172/JCI23237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Crescenzi A, Guidobaldi L, Nasrollah N, Taccogna S, Cicciarella Modica DD, Turrini L, Nigri G, Romanelli F, Valabrega S, Giovanella L, et al. Immunohistochemistry for BRAF(V600E) antibody VE1 performed in core needle biopsy samples identifies mutated papillary thyroid cancers. Horm Metab Res. 2014;46:370–374. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1368700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Clinkscales W, Ong A, Nguyen S, Harruff EE, Gillespie MB. Diagnostic value of RAS mutations in indeterminate thyroid nodules. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;156:472–479. doi: 10.1177/0194599816685697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fagin JA, Wells SA., Jr Biologic and clinical perspectives on thyroid cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2307. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1501993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lima CR, Geraldo MV, Fuziwara CS, Kimura ET, Santos MF. MiRNA-146b-5p upregulates migration and invasion of different Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma cells. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:108. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2146-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Condello V, Torregrossa L, Sartori C, Denaro M, Poma AM, Piaggi P, Valerio L, Materazzi G, Elisei R, Vitti P, Basolo F. mRNA and miRNA expression profiling of follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma with and without distant metastases. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2019;479:93–102. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2018.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chen F, Yin S, Zhu J, Liu P, Yang C, Feng Z, Deng Z. lncRNA DGCR5 acts as a tumor suppressor in papillary thyroid carcinoma via sequestering miR-2861. Exp Ther Med. 2019;17:895–900. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.7012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Matsumoto Y, Saito M, Saito K, Kanke Y, Watanabe Y, Onozawa H, Hayase S, Sakamoto W, Ishigame T, Momma T, et al. Enhanced expression of KIF4A in colorectal cancer is associated with lymph node metastasis. Oncol Lett. 2018;15:2188–2194. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.7555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu C, Song YH, Mao Y, Wang HB, Nie G. MiRNA-106a promotes breast cancer progression by regulating DAX-1. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23:1574–1583. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201902_17116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lundgren S, Fagerstrom-Vahman H, Zhang C, Ben-Dror L, Mardinoglu A, Uhlen M, Nodin B, Jirström K. Discovery of KIRREL as a biomarker for prognostic stratification of patients with thin melanoma. Biomark Res. 2019;7:1. doi: 10.1186/s40364-018-0153-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Edgar R, Domrachev M, Lash AE. Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:207–210. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.1.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.He H, Jazdzewski K, Li W, Liyanarachchi S, Nagy R, Volinia S, Calin GA, Liu CG, Franssila K, Suster S, et al. The role of microRNA genes in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:19075–19080. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509603102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tarabichi M, Saiselet M, Tresallet C, Hoang C, Larsimont D, Andry G, Maenhaut C, Detours V. Revisiting the transcriptional analysis of primary tumours and associated nodal metastases with enhanced biological and statistical controls: Application to thyroid cancer. Br J Cancer. 2015;112:1665–1674. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Iacobas DA, Tuli NY, Iacobas S, Rasamny JK, Moscatello A, Geliebter J, Tiwari RK. Gene master regulators of papillary and anaplastic thyroid cancers. Oncotarget. 2017;9:2410–2424. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Diboun I, Wernisch L, Orengo CA, Koltzenburg M. Microarray analysis after RNA amplification can detect pronounced differences in gene expression using limma. BMC Genomics. 2006;7:252. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dennis G, Jr, Sherman BT, Hosack DA, Yang J, Gao W, Lane HC, Lempicki RA. DAVID: Database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery. Genome Biol. 2003;4:P3. doi: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-9-r60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. The gene ontology consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25:25–29. doi: 10.1038/75556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M, Sato Y, Morishima K. KEGG: New perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D353–D361. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Szklarczyk D, Morris JH, Cook H, Kuhn M, Wyder S, Simonovic M, Santos A, Doncheva NT, Roth A, Bork P, et al. The STRING database in 2017: Quality-controlled protein-protein association networks, made broadly accessible. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D362–D368. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chin CH, Chen SH, Wu HH, Ho CW, Ko MT, Lin CY. cytoHubba: Identifying hub objects and sub-networks from complex interactome. BMC Syst Biol. 2014;8(Suppl 4):S11. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-8-S4-S11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tan J, Qian X, Song B, An X, Cai T, Zuo Z, Ding D, Lu Y, Li H. Integrated bioinformatics analysis reveals that the expression of cathepsin S is associated with lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in papillary thyroid cancer. Oncol Rep. 2018;40:111–122. doi: 10.3892/or.2018.6428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Asa SL, Giordano TJ, LiVolsi VA. Implications of the TCGA genomic characterization of papillary thyroid carcinoma for thyroid pathology: Does follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma exist? Thyroid. 2015;25:1–2. doi: 10.1089/thy.2014.0540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang K, Xu J, Li S, Liu S, Zhang L. Population-based study evaluating and predicting the probability of death resulting from thyroid cancer among patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Cancer Med. 2019;8:6977–6985. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Londero SC, Krogdahl A, Bastholt L, Overgaard J, Pedersen HB, Hahn CH, Bentzen J, Schytte S, Christiansen P, Gerke O, et al. Papillary thyroid carcinoma in Denmark, 1996–2008: Outcome and evaluation of established prognostic scoring systems in a prospective national cohort. Thyroid. 2015;25:78–84. doi: 10.1089/thy.2014.0294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rappa G, Puglisi C, Santos MF, Forte S, Memeo L, Lorico A. Extracellular vesicles from thyroid carcinoma: The New Frontier of Liquid Biopsy. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:E1114. doi: 10.3390/ijms20051114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Andriescu EC, Caruntu ID, Giusca SE, Lozneanu L, Ciobanu Apostol DG. Prognostic significance of cell-adhesion molecules in histological variants of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2018;59:721–727. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tang T, Zhang DL. Study on extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 protein expression in papillary thyroid carcinoma using a quantum dot-based immunofluorescence technique. Exp Ther Med. 2015;9:1331–1335. doi: 10.3892/etm.2015.2287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Selemetjev S, Bartolome A, Isic Dencic T, Đorić I, Paunović I, Tatić S, Cvejić D. Overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor and its downstream effector, focal adhesion kinase, correlates with papillary thyroid carcinoma progression. Int J Exp Pathol. 2018;99:87–94. doi: 10.1111/iep.12268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Arts RJ, Plantinga TS, Tuit S, Ulas T, Heinhuis B, Tesselaar M, Sloot Y, Adema GJ, Joosten LA, Smit JW, et al. Transcriptional and metabolic reprogramming induce an inflammatory phenotype in non-medullary thyroid carcinoma-induced macrophages. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5:e1229725. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1229725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.French CA, Fletcher JA, Cibas ES, Caulfield C, Allard P, Kroll TG. Molecular detection of PPAR gamma rearrangements and thyroid carcinoma in preoperative fine-needle aspiration biopsies. Endocr Pathol. 2008;19:166–174. doi: 10.1007/s12022-008-9053-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Miryala SK, Anbarasu A, Ramaiah S. Discerning molecular interactions: A comprehensive review on biomolecular interaction databases and network analysis tools. Gene. 2018;642:84–94. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2017.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wang S, Wang H, Lu Y. Tianfoshen oral liquid: A CFDA approved clinical traditional Chinese medicine, normalizes major cellular pathways disordered during colorectal carcinogenesis. Oncotarget. 2017;8:14549–14569. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wasenius VM, Hemmer S, Kettunen E, Knuutila S, Franssila K, Joensuu H. Hepatocyte growth factor receptor, matrix metalloproteinase-11, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1, and fibronectin are up-regulated in papillary thyroid carcinoma: A cDNA and tissue microarray study. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:68–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Qiu J, Zhang W, Xia Q, Liu F, Li L, Zhao S, Gao X, Zang C, Ge R, Sun Y. RNA sequencing identifies crucial genes in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) progression. Exp Mol Pathol. 2016;100:151–159. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2015.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hawthorn L, Stein L, Varma R, Wiseman S, Loree T, Tan D. TIMP1 and SERPIN-A overexpression and TFF3 and CRABP1 underexpression as biomarkers for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Head Neck. 2004;26:1069–1083. doi: 10.1002/hed.20099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lin P, Guo YN, Shi L, Li XJ, Yang H, He Y, Li Q, Dang YW, Wei KL, Chen G. Development of a prognostic index based on an immunogenomic landscape analysis of papillary thyroid cancer. Aging (Albany NY) 2019;11:480–500. doi: 10.18632/aging.101754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Verghese PB, Castellano JM, Garai K, Wang Y, Jiang H, Shah A, Bu G, Frieden C, Holtzman DM. ApoE influences amyloid-β (Aβ) clearance despite minimal apoE/Aβ association in physiological conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:E1807–E1816. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220484110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zokaei N, Cepukaityte G, Board AG, Mackay CE, Husain M, Nobre AC. Dissociable effects of the apolipoprotein-E (APOE) gene on short- and long-term memories. Neurobiol Aging. 2019;73:115–122. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.09.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zheng L, Duan J, Duan X, Zhou W, Chen C, Li Y, Chen J, Zhou W, Wang YJ, Li T, Song W. Association of Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) polymorphism with Alzheimer's disease in Chinese population. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2016;13:912–917. doi: 10.2174/1567205013666160401115307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Weber C, Soehnlein O. ApoE controls the interface linking lipids and inflammation in atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:3825–3827. doi: 10.1172/JCI60457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.An HJ, Koh HM, Song DH. Apolipoprotein E is a predictive marker for assessing non-small cell lung cancer patients with lymph node metastasis. Pathol Res Pract. 2019;215:152607. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2019.152607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zhao Z, Zou S, Guan X, Wang M, Jiang Z, Liu Z, Li C, Lin H, Liu X, Yang R, et al. Apolipoprotein E overexpression is associated with tumor progression and poor survival in colorectal cancer. Front Genet. 2018;9:650. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.LXR agonism inhibits metastatic melanoma through activation of ApoE. Cancer Discov. 2014;4:OF16. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-RW2014-056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pencheva N, Tran H, Buss C, Huh D, Drobnjak M, Busam K, Tavazoie SF. Convergent multi-miRNA targeting of ApoE drives LRP1/LRP8-dependent melanoma metastasis and angiogenesis. Cell. 2012;151:1068–1082. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Tavazoie MF, Pollack I, Tanqueco R, Ostendorf BN, Reis BS, Gonsalves FC, Kurth I, Andreu-Agullo C, Derbyshire ML, Posada J, et al. LXR/ApoE activation restricts innate immune suppression in cancer. Cell. 2018;172:825–840.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tahmasbpour E, Ghanei M, Panahi Y. Two lung cancer development-related genes, Forkhead Box M1 (FOXM1) and Apolipoprotein E (APOE), are overexpressed in Bronchial of patients after long-term exposure to Sulfur Mustard. Iran J Pharm Res. 2017;16:1487–1494. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Liu Z, Gao Y, Hao F, Lou X, Zhang X, Li Y, Wu D, Xiao T, Yang L, Li Q, et al. Secretomes are a potential source of molecular targets for cancer therapies and indicate that APOE is a candidate biomarker for lung adenocarcinoma metastasis. Mol Biol Rep. 2014;41:7507–7523. doi: 10.1007/s11033-014-3641-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sakashita K, Tanaka F, Zhang X, Mimori K, Kamohara Y, Inoue H, Sawada T, Hirakawa K, Mori M. Clinical significance of ApoE expression in human gastric cancer. Oncol Rep. 2008;20:1313–1319. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Slattery ML, Sweeney C, Murtaugh M, Ma KN, Potter JD, Levin TR, Samowitz W, Wolff R. Associations between apoE genotype and colon and rectal cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2005;26:1422–1429. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgi088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Liu F, Zhang J, Qin L, Yang Z, Xiong J, Zhang Y, Li R, Li S, Wang H, Yu B, et al. Circular RNA EIF6 (Hsa_circ_0060060) sponges miR-144-3p to promote the cisplatin-resistance of human thyroid carcinoma cells by autophagy regulation. Aging (Albany NY) 2018;10:3806–3820. doi: 10.18632/aging.101674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Jia M, Shi Y, Li Z, Lu X, Wang J. MicroRNA-146b-5p as an oncomiR promotes papillary thyroid carcinoma development by targeting CCDC6. Cancer Lett. 2019;443:145–156. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.11.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the present study are available in the Gene Expression Omnibus repository (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and The Cancer Genome Atlas repository (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/).


Articles from Oncology Letters are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES