Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Oncology Letters logoLink to Oncology Letters
. 2020 Jan 23;19(3):2502–2507. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11339

Overexpression of HURP mRNA in head and neck carcinoma and association with in vitro response to vinorelbine

Ahmed S K Al-Khafaji 1,2, Paschalia Pantazi 2, Amelia Acha-Sagredo 2, Andrew Schache 2, Janet M Risk 2, Richard J Shaw 2, Triantafillos Liloglou 2,✉
PMCID: PMC7039110  PMID: 32194751

Abstract

HURP gene encodes the hepatoma upregulated protein (HURP), a microtubule associated protein regulating mitotic spindle dynamics, which promotes chromosomal congression and alignment during mitosis, with a potential role in tumorigenesis. In the present study, HURP mRNA expression was investigated by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Primary OPSCC tumors from 107 patients and 48 adjacent normal tissues, as well as 12 respiratory tract cancer cell lines (9 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, 2 lung cancer and 1 normal bronchial) were utilised in the present study. mRNA expression levels of HURP were higher in malignant OPSCC tissues compared with in normal mucosa (P<1×10−5) and significantly associated with sex and smoking status (P<0.0001). Vinorelbine in vitro toxicity at half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) was measured in the 11 cancer cell lines using an MTT assay. Sensitivity to vinorelbine was significantly correlated with HURP expression (r=0.636; P=0.035). The data indicated that HURP overexpression is frequent in OPSCC tissues and associated with smoking. The correlation between HURP mRNA expression and vinorelbine in vitro response suggests that HURP is a potential modulator of vinorelbine response; therefore, it should be explored for its possible predictive value for the efficiency of vinorelbine treatment in this type of cancer.

Keywords: hepatoma upregulated protein, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, vinorelbine, mRNA expression, smoking, human papillomavirus

Introduction

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a collective term to describe malignant tumors of the nasal cavity, nasopharynx, larynx and oral cavity. HNSCC represents the sixth most common malignancy worldwide (1). The main risk factors for developing HNSCC cancer are: a) the synergistic effect of tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption (2,3), b) viral infections such as human papillomavirus (HPV) (4) Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) (5), and c) genetic predisposition (6). Accumulated molecular evidence in recent years has proved that HPV is a key risk factor for increasing incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) (7–9). Vinorelbine is an antimitotic agent, which belongs to the vinca alkaloids family and is effectively used to treat a variety of cancer cases. Some in vitro studies on HNSCC cells have reported an additive effect of vinorelbine to radiation exposure (10,11). In clinical trials, vinorelbine administration has also brought clinical benefits for treating advanced, recurrent/metastatic cases of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (12–18). This indicates a clinical need to identify the cases that would benefit from vinorelbine. It is essential, therefore, to explore potential biomarkers that have predictive value for vinorelbine based therapy of HNSCC cases alongside the disease prognosis.

Vinorelbine affects MT dynamics and prevents formation of the mitotic spindle, resulting in metaphase arrest deregulation of HURP expression, in relation (19). Therefore, the overexpression of genes involved in spindle assembly and microtubule dynamics could mediate vinorelbine chemo-resistance. HURP protein is encoded by HURP or DLGAP5 (Disks large-associated protein 5) gene, located on chromosome 14q22.3. HURP is a MAP protein associated with kinetochore MTs, that plays a critical role in spindle assembly, chromosome congression, alignment and segregation (20–23) and has a previously reported to be involved in tumorigenesis (24,25). Hence, it can be hypothesised that HURP expression may predict response to vinorelbine in cancer cells.

Elevated levels of HURP mRNA transcripts have been reported in lung cancer (26) and potentially associated with prognostication (27). The predictive value of HURP expression for radiotherapy has also been reported in prostate cancer cells (28). Increased HURP mRNA expression has also been observed in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) (29) and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) (30).

In this study, we evaluated HURP mRNA expression in a large group of oropharyngeal tumors and investigated potential associations with clinicopathological characteristics. In addition, we explored the involvement of HURP mRNA expression in the in vitro response to vinorelbine, which is a commonly used agent for the management of late stage HNSCCs.

Materials and methods

Patients and specimens

Clinicopathological data (gender, age, and lymph node involvement) were anonymously provided based on the ethical approval already granted (South Sefton Research Ethics Committee; EC.47.01-6 & North West 5 Research Ethics Committee; 09.H1010.5). Primary OPSCC tissues were available from 107 patients. Normal adjacent mucosa was available from 48 of these patients. Snap frozen biopsies were cryo-sectioned using OCT embedding matrix (CellPath Ltd.) to embed frozen blocks for cryosectioning using Cryostat (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). A 5-mm section fixed in 10% buffered formalin (cat. no. UN 2209, AnalaR) and stained with hematoxylin (cat. no. 6765003, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and eosin (cat. no. 6766007, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) for histopathological examination was followed by two 10 mm sections that were utilised for RNA extraction.

Cell lines and growth conditions

Cancer cell lines utilised in this study were taken from the repositories of the Head and Neck group biobank and the Liverpool Lung Project biobank. All of them are established cell lines representing squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (UPCI-SCC090) OPSCC, PE/CA-PJ41 (oral squamous epithelium), PE/CA-PJ15 (oral, tongue), UMSCC19 (oropharyngeal, base of tongue), UMSCC12 (laryngeal), UMSCC104 (oral, floor of mouth), UMSCC4 (oropharyngeal base of tongue), HN5 (oral), UMSCC81B (oropharyngeal, tonsil/glottic laryngeal), adenocarcinoma of lung (A549 and CALU6) and a normal non-tumorigenic immortalized bronchial cell line (HBEC-3KT) (31). Cell lines examined in this study were authenticated (GenePrint 10 System; Promega Corporation) and mycoplasma tested (Myco™ plus Mycoplasma PCR Detection kit; iNtRON Biotechnology).

All cancer cell lines were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)/Ham's Nutrient Mixture F-12 (1:1) containing 5% fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA). HBEC-3HT cell line was cultured in Keratinocyte-SFM medium supplemented with 50 mg/ml bovine pituitary extract (BPE) and 5 ng/ml human recombinant epidermal growth factor (rEGF) (Life Technologies; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). All cell lines were maintained at 37°C, 5% CO2.

RNA extraction and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted utilising the Direct-zol™ RNA MiniPrep kit (Zymo Research Corp.), quantified using a NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and reverse transcribed utilising the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Life Technologies; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), according to the manufacturers' instructions. For RT-qPCR, primers and probe for ACTB were designed using the OLIGO 7 software (Molecular Biology Insights) (forward: 5′-GGCACCCAGCACAATGAAG-3′, reverse: 5′-CATACTCCTGCTTGCTGATCCA-3′, probe: 5′ VIC-CTCCTCCTGAGCGCAAGTACTCCGTG-NFQ 3′), while the predesigned assay for HURP mRNA expression (Hs00207323-m1) was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. RT-qPCR assays were performed in 2 replicates for clinical specimens and 4 replicates for cell lines. mRNA expression levels were calculated as relative quantification (RQ) values, based on the equation RQ = 2−ΔΔCq, where Cq represents quantification cycle values that determined by StepOne software (version 1.2; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and normalised to the corresponding Cq value for the endogenous control ACTB, generating ΔCq values (ΔCq = Cq target-Cq ACTB). Sample ΔCq values were further normalised against HBEC-3KT control using the formula: ΔΔCq = (ΔCq sample-ΔCq HBEC-3KT) (32). HPV status of the tumors in the study was previously detected (33,34).

Vinorelbrine exposure

Cell line growth in the presence of varying concentrations of vinorelbine (0–500 nM) was assessed by MTT assay. Exposure lasted for 72 h and measurements were taken from six biological repeats.

HURP mRNA expression differences across categorical clinicopathological parameters were assessed using the Mann-Whitney test. Spearman's correlation was used to test the relationship between HURP mRNA expression and response to vinorelbine.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses, except the IC50 calculation, were performed using IBM® SPSS® statistical software (version 24.0; IBM SPSS). The vinorelbine IC50 values were calculated using non-linear regression in Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, Inc.).

Results

Gene expression analysis

RT-qPCR analysis in primary human HNSCC tissues showed that HURP transcript levels were significantly higher in tumor tissues compared with those in adjacent normal mucosa (Mann-Whitney test, P<10−5, Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Boxplots demonstrating HURP mRNA expression levels (RQ values) in primary OPSCC tumors compared with in normal adjacent tissues. The level of HURP transcripts was significantly upregulated in OPSCC tissue compared with in normal tissues. P-values were derived from Mann-Whitney tests. RQ values were calculated using RNA extracted from HBEC-3KT cells as a calibrator. *Extreme values (>3× interquartile range); °Outlier values (>1.5× interquartile range). HURP, hepatoma upregulated protein; OPSCC, oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma; RQ, relative quantification.

HURP transcript levels significantly correlated with patients' gender (Mann-Whitney test, P=0.019) and smoking status (Mann-Whitney test, P=0.041). It has to be noted though that gender was associated with smoking status (χ2 test, P<10−4). No association was observed between HURP mRNA expression and other parameters such as age, lymph node involvement, alcohol consumption or HPV status (Table I).

Table I.

Clinicopathological parameters of the patient cohort in the present study.

95% CI
Parameter Patients, n (%) (n=107) Mean expression Lower boundary Upper boundary P-valuea
Sex 0.02
  Male 82 (76.7) 99.49 23.55 175.43
  Female 25 (23.3) 18.59 3.96 33.21
Age, years 0.834
  <55 43 (40.2) 158.7 12.41 305.00
  ≥55 64 (59.8) 29.31 9.05 49.57
HPV status 0.981
  Positive 40 (37.4) 88.25 20.50 197.00
  Negative 67 (62.6) 67.91 14.00 121.80
Lymph node involvement 0.14
  Yes 71 (66.4) 85.18 11.54 158.82
  No 36 (33.6) 55.48 6.18 117.14
Tobacco use 0.04
  Yes 80 (74.8) 90.03 16.43 163.63
  No 27 (25.2) 42.98 17.06 103.03
Alcohol consumption 0.161
  Yes 90 (84.1) 86.83 23.58 150.09
  No 17 (15.9) 11.65 7.38 15.93
Open in a new tab
a

P-values derived from Mann-Whitney test.

Correlation of HURP mRNA levels with vinorelbine response

All HNSCC and lung cancer cell lines tested here showed significantly higher HURP mRNA expression compared to that of immortalized normal HBEC cells that was used as a calibrator (Fig. 2). Notably, the vinorelbine response presented as IC50 values (Table II) in the tested cancer cell lines was associated with the level of HURP mRNA expression (Spearman's rank test, r=0.636, P=0.035).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

mRNA expression levels of HURP in Respiratory Tract Center cell lines demonstrated that head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines expressed higher levels of HURP transcripts, most notably UPCI-UMSCC090 and PJ41 cells, compared with the normal HBEC cells. The bars depict the mean expression values from four replicates, whereas the error bars represent the 95% CI. HURP, hepatoma upregulated protein; RQ, relative quantification.

Table II.

Sensitivity of tested cell lines to vinorelbine compared with HURP expression and HPV status.

Cell line IC50, nM HURP RQ IC50 95% CI HPV status
CALU6 0.007 35.70 0.005–0.009 NA
A549 0.032 47.26 0.025–0.042 NA
UMSCC19 0.046 66.17 0.040–0.053 (−)
UMSCC104 0.052 54.96 0.041–0.062 (+)
UMSCC81B 0.055 39.58 0.044–0.071 (−)
UMSCC4 0.074 54.45 0.061–0.0809 (−)
UMSCC12 0.088 63.23 0.074–0.104 (−)
HN5 0.090 47.82 0.073–0.110 (−)
UPCI-SCC090 0.091 326.51 0.075–0.110 (+)
PJ41 0.103 214.21 0.080–0.132 (−)
PJ15 0.062 198.70 0.049–0.080 (−)
Open in a new tab

HPV, human papilloma virus; HURP, hepatoma upregulated protein; RQ, relative quantification.

Discussion

HURP overexpression has been previously reported in a number of human respiratory malignancies, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (26,27,35) and OSCC (29). However, the latter study validated publically available microarray data on an independent set of only 11 patients; therefore, the extent of HURP deregulation in HNSCCs is still unclear. In addition, as it is well established that HPV positive oropharyngeal tumors compose a distinct class from a therapeutic perspective (36), it was important to explore the deregulation of HURP expression, in relation to the tumors' HPV status. Our study included 107 oropharyngeal tumors, providing a more robust figure for the reported overexpression. This frequent overexpression of HURP indicates a potential role in OPSCC pathogenesis. This is not surprising since HURP regulates mitotic activity of spindle assembly (20–23), therefore alterations in its expression lead to defects in cell division and aneuploidy, contributing eventually to tumorigenesis. This is further supported by the observation that knockdown of HURP leads to inhibition of proliferation of human pharyngeal squamous carcinoma cells (37). The tumorigenic activity of HURP has also been reported in breast cancer (24), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (25) and ATC (30,38) indicating its important role in human cancer development.

Higher HURP mRNA levels were significantly associated with smoking in our study. This result is consistent with the fact that tobacco smoking is a well-known risk factor of HNSCC cancer alongside alcohol consumption (2,3). Currently the mechanism connecting smoking with HURP deregulation is not known. It still needs to be elucidated whether tobacco use has a causative role in this deregulation or whether it is a secondary effect of tobacco-induced carcinogenesis. The association with gender appears to be coincidental due to the significant correlation between smoking and gender in our dataset, which fits the recognised pattern (males smoke more) in the UK (https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/risk/tobacco#heading-One).

The lack of correlation between HURP mRNA expression and stage and nodal status of the tumors suggests this is an early event in OPSCC tumorigenesis. Furthermore, no correlation with HPV status was observed. However, one has to consider the fact that most of these HPV positive patients were also smokers, which may be a confounding factor in this analysis; therefore, a much larger cohort would be required to enable proper stratification between those parameters.

Vinorelbine has been studied for its clinical efficiency in treating HNSCC (10,11,39,40); however it has been used in late/recurrent stages only (12–18,41). To date, no biomarkers have been suggested as possible companion indicators for vinorelbine treatment in head and neck cancer. However some potential biomarkers have been suggested for predicting VRL efficiency in lung cancer (42,43). Our study is the first to suggest a possible role in predicting response to vinorelbine in vitro. A possible explanation behind the correlation we report is possibly related with the ability of HURP to bind directly to MTs and regulate their dynamics (21,22) while vinorelbine blocks mitosis by suppressing MT dynamics (19). Taken together, both lines of evidence may suggest HURP overexpression may be a potential predictor for resistance to vinorelbine-involving regimens in HNSCC patients. The next step is to expand this study to samples from relevant clinical trials involving vinorelbine, in order to establish the efficiency of HURP expression as a predictor for vinorelbine administration.

In conclusion, our study demonstrates for the first time the significant overexpression of HURP mRNA in OPSCC and its association with smoking. It also provides initial in vitro evidence for the potential role of HURP in resistance against antineoplastic agent vinorelbine. Future studies are required to uncover its potency to serve as a therapeutic stratification marker in regimens including this antimitotic agent, incorporating the fact that VRL is always used in combination with another chemotherapeutic agent.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Miss Ghaliah Alnefie (Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool) for her technical assistance in the cell culture maintenance.

Funding

The present study was funded by an International Exchange grant from the Royal Society (UK) and The Roy Castle Lung Cancer Foundation (UK). Dr Khafaji is funded by the University of Baghdad, Iraq (grant no. SL25).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

ASKAK made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study, the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, generated the datasets and drafted the work. PP sufficiently participated in the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, generated the datasets and revised the manuscript. AS collected clinical samples of primary oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma tissues and normal adjacent mucosa, performed their histological examination, contributed to the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, and revised the manuscript. AAS participated in the work sufficiently, contributed to the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, generated the datasets and revised the manuscript, gave final approval of the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. JMR contributed to the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, and revised the manuscript. RJS collected clinical samples of primary oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma tissues and normal adjacent mucosa, performed their histological examination, contributed to the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, and revised the manuscript. TL contributed to the acquisition of data, performed data analysis and interpretation, and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript to be published.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Clinicopathological data (sex, age and lymph node involvement) were anonymously provided based on the ethical approval already granted (South Sefton Research Ethics Committee, EC.47.01-6 and North West 5 Research Ethics Committee, 09.H1010.5).

Patient consent for publication

All clinical samples were collected after informed consent under previously granted ethical approval (South Sefton Research Ethics Committee, EC.47.01-6; North West 5 Research Ethics Committee, EC.09.H1010.5) from cases treated at the Liverpool Head and Neck Oncology Service, Liverpool, UK.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Maier H, Dietz A, Gewelke U, Seitz HK, Heller WD. Tobacco- and alcohol-associated cancer risk of the upper respiratory and digestive tract. Laryngorhinootologie. 1990;69:505–511. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-998241. (In German) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dal Maso L, Torelli N, Biancotto E, Di Maso M, Gini A, Franchin G, Levi F, La Vecchia C, Serraino D, Polesel J. Combined effect of tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking in the risk of head and neck cancers: A re-analysis of case-control studies using bi-dimensional spline models. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31:385–393. doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-0028-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.El-Mofty SK. Histopathologic risk factors in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma variants: An update with special reference to HPV-related carcinomas. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014;19:e377–e385. doi: 10.4317/medoral.20184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Broccolo F, Ciccarese G, Rossi A, Anselmi L, Drago F, Toniolo A. Human papillomavirus (HPV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in keratinizing versus non- keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. Infect Agent Cancer. 2018;13:32. doi: 10.1186/s13027-018-0205-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ali J, Sabiha B, Jan HU, Haider SA, Khan AA, Ali SS. Genetic etiology of oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2017;70:23–28. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hammarstedt L, Lindquist D, Dahlstrand H, Romanitan M, Dahlgren LO, Joneberg J, Creson N, Lindholm J, Ye W, Dalianis T, Munck-Wikland E. Human papillomavirus as a risk factor for the increase in incidence of tonsillar cancer. Int J Cancer. 2006;119:2620–2623. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chaturvedi AK, Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, Hernandez BY, Xiao W, Kim E, Jiang B, Goodman MT, Sibug-Saber M, Cozen W, et al. Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4294–4301. doi: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.5529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hong AM, Grulich AE, Jones D, Lee CS, Garland SM, Dobbins TA, Clark JR, Harnett GB, Milross CG, O'Brien CJ, Rose BR. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx in Australian males induced by human papillomavirus vaccine targets. Vaccine. 2010;28:3269–3272. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.02.098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Erjala K, Pulkkinen J, Kulmala J, Grenman R. Concomitant vinorelbine and radiation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in vitro. Acta Oncol. 2004;43:169–174. doi: 10.1080/02841860310023110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Erjala K, Zhang N, Sundvall M, Kulmala J, Elenius K, Grenman R. Concomitant chemoirradiation with vinorelbine and gefitinib induces additive effect in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines in vitro. Radiother Oncol. 2007;85:138–145. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rivera F, Vega-Villegas ME, López-Brea M, Isla D, Mayorga M, Galdós P, Rubio A, Del Valle A, García-Reija F, García-Montesinos B, et al. Randomized phase II study of cisplatin and 5-FU continuous infusion (PF) versus cisplatin, UFT and vinorelbine (UFTVP) as induction chemotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (LA-SCHNC) Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008;62:253–261. doi: 10.1007/s00280-007-0599-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Larsen S, Serup-Hansen E, Andersen LJ, Lindeløv B, McCulloch T, Adimi P, Bastholt L. A phase II study using vinorelbine and continuous 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Acta Oncol. 2007;46:374–377. doi: 10.1080/02841860600959981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Koussis H, Scola A, Bergamo F, Tonello S, Basso U, Karahontzitis P, Chiarion-Sileni V, Pasetto L, Ruol A, Loreggian L, et al. Neoadjuvant carboplatin and vinorelbine followed by chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck or oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A phase II study in elderly patients or patients with poor performance status. Anticancer Res. 2008;28:1383–1388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Marioni G, Koussis H, Gaio E, Giacomelli L, Bertolin A, D'Alessandro E, Scola A, Ottaviano G, de Filippis C, Jirillo A, et al. MASPIN's prognostic role in patients with advanced head and neck carcinoma treated with primary chemotherapy (carboplatin plus vinorelbine) and radiotherapy: Preliminary evidence. Acta Otolaryngol. 2009;129:786–792. doi: 10.1080/00016480802412789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Massa E, Dessi M, Gaspardini G, Saba F, Cherchi V, Mantovani G. Phase II study of vinorelbine/cetuximab in patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck progressing after at least two chemotherapy regimens. Oral Oncol. 2010;46:818–821. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Barth C, Naveau L, Touboul E, Périé S, Bamogho E, Haberer-Guillerm S, Schlienger M, Lacau St Guily J, Huguet F. Efficacy and safety of vinorelbine in heavily pretreated recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients. Anticancer Drugs. 2016;27:349–352. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Airoldi M, Garzaro M, Pedani F, Ostellino O, Succo G, Riva G, Sensini M, Naqe N, Bellini E, Raimondo L, Pecorari G. Cisplatin+vinorelbine treatment of recurrent or metastatic salivary gland malignancies (RMSGM): A final report on 60 cases. Am J Clin Oncol. 2017;40:86–90. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gregory RK, Smith IE. Vinorelbine-a clinical review. Br J Cancer. 2000;82:1907–1913. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wong J, Fang G. HURP controls spindle dynamics to promote proper interkinetochore tension and efficient kinetochore capture. J Cell Biol. 2006;173:879–891. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200511132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Koffa MD, Casanova CM, Santarella R, Köcher T, Wilm M, Mattaj IW. HURP is part of a Ran-dependent complex involved in spindle formation. Curr Biol. 2006;16:743–754. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sillje HH, Nagel S, Körner R, Nigg EA. HURP is a Ran-importin beta-regulated protein that stabilizes kinetochore microtubules in the vicinity of chromosomes. Curr Biol. 2006;16:731–742. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.02.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Santarella RA, Koffa MD, Tittmann P, Gross H, Hoenger A. HURP wraps microtubule ends with an additional tubulin sheet that has a novel conformation of tubulin. J Mol Biol. 2007;365:1587–1595. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.10.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chen J, Liu QJ, Wang D, Zhou XY, Xiong D, Li HJ, Li CL. Hepatoma upregulated protein expression is involved in the pathogenesis of human breast carcinogenesis. Oncol Lett. 2014;8:2543–2548. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.2614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liao W, Liu W, Yuan Q, Liu X, Ou Y, He S, Yuan S, Qin L, Chen Q, Nong K, et al. Silencing of DLGAP5 by siRNA significantly inhibits the proliferation and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Al-Khafaji ASK, Marcus MW, Davies MPA, Risk JM, Shaw RJ, Field JK, Liloglou T. AURKA mRNA expression is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol Lett. 2017;13:4463–4468. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang Q, Chen Y, Feng H, Zhang B, Wang H. Prognostic and predictive value of HURP in nonsmall cell lung cancer. Oncol Rep. 2018;39:1682–1692. doi: 10.3892/or.2018.6280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hassan M, El Khattouti A, Ejaeidi A, Ma T, Day WA, Espinoza I, Vijayakumar S, Gomez CR. Elevated expression of hepatoma up-regulated protein inhibits gamma-irradiation-induced apoptosis of prostate cancer cells. J Cell Biochem. 2016;117:1308–1318. doi: 10.1002/jcb.25419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang YH, Tian X, Liu OS, Fang XD, Quan HZ, Xie S, Gao S, Tang ZG. Gene profiling analysis for patients with oral verrucous carcinoma and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7:1845–1852. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Weinberger P, Ponny SR, Xu H, Bai S, Smallridge R, Copland J, Sharma A. Cell cycle M-phase genes are highly upregulated in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid. 2017;27:236–252. doi: 10.1089/thy.2016.0285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sato M, Vaughan MB, Girard L, Peyton M, Lee W, Shames DS, Ramirez RD, Sunaga N, Gazdar AF, Shay JW, Minna JD. Multiple oncogenic changes (K-RAS(V12), p53 knockdown, mutant EGFRs, p16 bypass, telomerase) are not sufficient to confer a full malignant phenotype on human bronchial epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 2006;66:2116–2128. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Schache AG, Liloglou T, Risk JM, Filia A, Jones TM, Sheard J, Woolgar JA, Helliwell TR, Triantafyllou A, Robinson M, et al. Evaluation of human papilloma virus diagnostic testing in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Sensitivity, specificity, and prognostic discrimination. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:6262–6271. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schache AG, Liloglou T, Risk JM, Jones TM, Ma XJ, Wang H, Bui S, Luo Y, Sloan P, Shaw RJ, Robinson M. Validation of a novel diagnostic standard in HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:1332–1339. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shi YX, Yin JY, Shen Y, Zhang W, Zhou HH, Liu ZQ. Genome-scale analysis identifies NEK2, DLGAP5 and ECT2 as promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in human lung cancer. Sci Rep. 2017;7:8072. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08615-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Schache AG, Powell NG, Cuschieri KS, Robinson M, Leary S, Mehanna H, Rapozo D, Long A, Cubie H, Junor E, et al. HPV-related oropharynx cancer in the United Kingdom: An evolution in the understanding of disease etiology. Cancer Res. 2016;76:6598–6606. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bai Y, Cui X, Gao D, Wang Y, Wang B, Wang W. Golgi integral membrane protein 4 manipulates cellular proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle in human head and neck cancer. Biosci Rep. 2018;38:BSR20180454. doi: 10.1042/BSR20180454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Liu M, Qiu YL, Jin T, Zhou Y, Mao ZY, Zhang YJ. Meta-analysis of microarray datasets identify several chromosome segregation-related cancer/testis genes potentially contributing to anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. PeerJ. 2018;6:e5822. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Schuler PJ, Trellakis S, Greve J, Bas M, Bergmann C, Bölke E, Lehnerdt G, Mattheis S, Albers AE, Brandau S, et al. In vitro chemosensitivity of head and neck cancer cell lines. Eur J Med Res. 2010;15:337–344. doi: 10.1186/2047-783X-15-8-337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hong MH, Kim CG, Koh YW, Choi EC, Kim J, Yoon SO, Kim HR, Cho BC. Efficacy and safety of vinorelbine plus cisplatin chemotherapy for patients with recurrent and/or metastatic salivary gland cancer of the head and neck. Head Neck. 2018;40:55–62. doi: 10.1002/hed.24933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rivera F, Vega-Villegas ME, López-Brea MF, García-Castaño A, de Juan A, Ramos FJ, Collado A, Galdós P, Rubio A, del Valle A, et al. Long term results of a phase II trial of induction chemotherapy with uracil-ftegafur (UFT), vinorelbine and cisplatin (UFTVP) followed by radiotherapy concomitant with UFT and carboplatin (RT/UFTJ) in non-resectable locally advanced (stage IV-B) squamous cell head and neck carcinoma and peripheral blood stem cell support (PBSCS) with febrile neutropenia. Clin Transl Oncol. 2007;9:40–47. doi: 10.1007/s12094-007-0038-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pan JH, Han JX, Wu JM, Sheng LJ, Huang HN. CYP450 polymorphisms predict clinic outcomes to vinorelbine-based chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Acta Oncol. 2007;46:361–366. doi: 10.1080/02841860600902197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pan JH, Han JX, Wu JM, Sheng LJ, Huang HN, Yu QZ. MDR1 single nucleotide polymorphisms predict response to vinorelbine-based chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Respiration. 2008;75:380–385. doi: 10.1159/000108407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Articles from Oncology Letters are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES