Skip to main content
African Health Sciences logoLink to African Health Sciences
. 2019 Sep;19(3):2623–2633. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v19i3.38

Prevalence and risk factors of sexual dysfunction in healthy women in Turkey

Meral Kılıç 1
PMCID: PMC7040295  PMID: 32127835

Abstract

Objectives

This is a cross sectional study conducted in order to determine sexual dysfunction in healthy women and risk factors.

Patients and methods

The population of the study consisted of 282 women. The whole of the population, without sample selection, was included in the study. For data, questionnaire and Female Sexual Function Index-FSFI, whose Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted, were used. Student t and chi-square significant tests and logistic regression analysis were used to carry out statistical analysis.

Results

It was found that 35.8% of 282 women who participated in the study were in the age range of 30–39 years, 54.6% had high school educational level or above, and 59.6% worked. Prevalence was determined as 53.2% FSFI score < 26 according to Female Sexual Function Index FSFI; 23% of the women had complaints about urinary incontinence UI. According to logistic regression results, it is determined that CFB risk is increased in patients with age and urination problem. It was determined that there was no significant correlation between income, number of children, prceived economic status, dyspareunia, having problem with the partner, experiencing premenstrual syndrome, and SD.

Conclusion

In this study, approximately half of healthy women had SD and development of SD was affected based on some descriptive characteristics. As sexual life was considered as a factor increasing life quality, it was thought that it is fairly important to discuss the questioning of problems related to sexual life for systematic evaluation of patients, as well.

Keywords: SD, risk factors, prevalence, Turkey

Background

Sexual dysfunction in women is a public health issue with many physical and psychological outcomes, that affects women's quality of life1. Sexuality is a complex process related to neurological, vascular and endocrine systems. It also includes familial, social, and religious beliefs2.

Female sexual dysfunction FSD is a common problem and negatively influences life quality. Sexual dysfunction is defined as a permanent or recurrent decrease in sexual desire or arousal, having difficulty/insufficiency with success of achieving orgasm, and feeling pain during sexual intercourse3. SD has been stated as a sexual problem that adult women may experience at the rate of 40–45% in any time of their lives3. Complex interaction of several genetic, biological, psychological, social, and cultural factors play a role in etiology of SD46. The most common risk factors of SD are general health condition of individuals, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of cardiovascular disorder, coexistence of other genitourinary disorders, psychiatric and psychological disorders, other chronic disorders, and socio-demographic characteristics3.

Sexual dysfunction may significantly affect individual's mood, self-confidence, life quality and may cause breakdown of interpersonal relationship and emotional stress7. Sexual dysfunction may be physically worrying, emotionally stressful, and socially destructive for several women8. In a previous study, it was stated that physical and emotional health of women experiencing sexual dysfunction was worse9. In another study, it was found that if a woman was not comfortable with sexuality, this resulted in interparental conflict and divorce and reproduction was influenced2. Sexual dysfunction between spouses has been reported as the second underlying reason for divorce in Muslim countries10.

As it is in several cultures, sexuality is an issue that is also assumed as a taboo, ignored by women, and is not considered very much by healthcare professionals in Turkey. This condition may make negative impacts on life quality deeper by causing sexual problems to become more complex and harder to solve. However, it is very important to discuss questioning about sexual life in systematic evaluation of patients when sexual life is considered as a factor that enhances quality of life. Therefore, the study was conducted in order to examine sexual dysfunction and reasons in healthy women in age group of 15–49 years and to draw attention of healthcare professionals on this issue.

Objectives

Sexual dysfunction SD is a complex health problem affected by numerous anatomic, psychological, medical, and social factors. This is a cross sectional study conducted in order to determine sexual dysfunction in healthy women; and its risk factors.

Material and methods

Study design

This study was a cross sectional one conducted in order to determine sexual dysfunction and its reasons in healthy women. The data were collected from women who attended the gynecology outpatient clinic of a University Hospital between 1 April and 30 June 2016. Inclusion criteria of the sample were determined as being older than 20 years, agreeing to participate in the study, married, not breastfeeding, not being pregnant, and not going through menopause. The women who were diagnosed with any type of systemic disorder, such as diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, etc., using medicine continuously due to any reason, and were at one year period of postpartum were excluded from the study. The sample of the study consisted of 282 women who attended the outpatient clinic for various complaints or control between specified date and met the criteria.

Instruments and measures

The data were collected by using face-to-face interview technique via a questionnaire developed by the researchers after the relevant literature review2,1013. A questionnaire and Female Sexual Function Index-FSFI, whose Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted, were used as data collection tool14. In the questionnaire, risk factors that may influence socio-demographic, obstetric, and sexual functions of the women were questioned. Age, education, employment status, income, health insurance, and duration of marriage were evaluated as demographic characteristics. For obstetric characteristics, number of children, type of birth, and status of using family planning method were assessed. Urinary incontinence, vaginal route infection, pain during sexual intercourse (dyspareunia), premature ejaculation problem of partner, erection problem of partner, and experiencing premenstrual syndrome were evaluated as factors related to sexual dysfunction.

FSFI is a Likert type scale consisting of 19 items and evaluating sexual dysfunction in women. Validity and reliability study of FSFI was conducted by Rosen et al.14, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.82 and test reliability was 0.79- 0.86. Scale's Turkish validity and reliability analysis was conducted by Oksuz and Malhan15. Scale consists of 6 separate titles: desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. Each title in this scale was scored between 0 or 1 and 6. Score range of overall scale was between 2 minimum score and 36 maximum score. High score indicates better function. In this study Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.81 and existence of sexual dysfunction in this study was also accepted in women who had a score of 26.55 and below16.

Data analysis

The data were evaluated by using SPSS 10.0 packaged software and complementary statistics of the data were assessed by using percentage distribution and mean. Student t and chi-square significance tests were used in order to determine possible correlations between dependent and independent variables. Logistic regression analysis method was utilized for detecting risk factors that may cause sexual dysfunction.

Ethical principles

In order to conduct this study, ethical approval of Atatürk University Institutional of Health Sciences Review Board according to the Declaration of Helsinki IRB No. CMUH-2016/03/9 was received. As the questions had to be answered voluntarily, we informed the participants that they were free in participating in the study and we assured their willingness and voluntariness. There after, the participants were informed and their questions were answered about the study. They were also informed that they could withdraw from the study anytime, and this would not care received at the clinic.

Results

As descriptive characteristics of the women participating in the study were examined; it was found that duration of marriage was 14.58±10.40, the number of children was 2.23±0.99, and frequency of intercourse was 1.08±068; 35.8% of the women were in age group of 30–39 years, 54.6% of the women and 69.5% of their husbands had high school level and above education, 59.6% of the women were employed, 54.6% of their husbands were civil servants, and 87.2% stated their perceived economic condition as medium-good; 72.5% of the women also expressed that they used modern method, and 71.5% had had normal delivery Table 1.

Table 1.

Distribution of women's descriptive characteristics

Characteristics Mean sd
Duration of marriage 14.58 10.40
Number of children 2.23 0.99
Frequency of intercourse Week 1.08 0.68
Age
20–29
30–39
40–49
50 and older
72
101
76
33
25.5
35.8
27.0
11.7
Educational Level
Secondary school and below
High school and above
128
154
45.4
54.6
Educational level of Husband
Secondary school and below
High school and above
86
196
30.5
69.5
Employment Status
Employed
Unemployed
114
168
40.4
59.6
Husband's Job
Self employed
Civil servant
128
154
45.4
54.6
Perceived Economic condition
High
Medium + low
36
246
12.8
87.2
Status of Using Method n:262
Modern method
Withdrawal
190
72
72.5
27.5
Type of Birth n: 253
Normal
Cesarean
181
72
71.5
28.5
IFSI SCORE
Low 26 points and less
Medium+ high 27 points and above
150
103
53.2
36.5

When risk factors that may cause sexual dysfunction in women were examined; 23% had urinary incontinence, 26.6% had symptom of urinary tract infection, and 22.6% experienced pain during sexual intercourse. It was determined that husbands of 15.7% of women had premature ejaculation problem, husbands of 7.1% had erection problem, 8.6% had problem with their husbands, and 37.6% experienced premenstrual syndrome Table 2.

Table 2.

Distribution of risk factors to cause sexual dysfunction

Risk Factors Number %
Experiencing urinary incontinence 65 23
Symptom of urinary tract infection 75 26.6
Experiencing pain during sexual intercourse dyspareunia 63 22.6
Premature ejaculation problem of husband 44 15.7
Having erectile problem 20 7.1
Having problem with husband 24 8.6
Experiencing premenstrual syndrome 106 37.6

In Table 3, it was found that women's duration of marriage, age, education of women and their husbands, using method, and type of birth were correlated with experiencing sexual dysfunction, but there was not a significant correlation between income level, the number of children, and perceived economic status and sexual dysfunction p>0.05 Table 3.

Table 3.

Correlation of female sexual dysfunction with descriptive characteristics and logistic regression analysis of risk factors

Descriptive
Characteristics
Sexual Dysfunction Significance
test
OR
95%
confidence interval
Yes
x±SD
No
x±SD
Duration of Marriage 1,724±1.101 2.213±1.106 t: -3.585
p: .000
.105 .498–1.647
p: 746
Income 1.153±,3615 1.106±,3103 t: 1.064
p:..288
304 .332–1.855
p: 581
Number of children 2.150±1.766 2.178±,5549 t: -155
p: .877
2.724 .961–1.599
p: 099
Age
40 years and below
40 years and above
106 70.7
67 50.8
44 29.3
65 49.2
X2= 11.737
p: .000
2.3371.432–3.815
p:.001
Educational level of
woman
Secondary school and
below
High school and above
54 42.2

96 62.3
74 57.8

58 37.7
X2= 13.399

p: .001
.810 .373–1.760

p: .595
Husband's educational
level
Secondary school and
below
High school and above
30 34.9

120 61.2
56 65.1

76 38.8
X2= 16.657
p:. 000
.616 .291–1.306
p: .206
Employment status
Unemployed
Employed
69 60.5
81 48.2
45 39.5
87 51.8
X2= 4.135
p: . 052
.786 .398–1.549
p: .486
Perceived economic
status
High
Medium+low
126 51.2
24 66.7
120 48,8
12 33.3
X2= 3.010
p: .107
.568 .240–1.347
p: .200
Status of Using
Method n:262
Modern method
Withdrawal
113 59.5
30 41.7
77 40.5
42 58.3
X2= 6.679
p: .012
.1.508 .815–2.789
p: .191
Type of Birth n: 253
Normal
Cesarean
85 47.0
45 62.5
96 53.0
27 37.5
X2= 4.979
p: .027
2.608 .277–1.132
p: .394

According to correlation of sexual dysfunction with descriptive characteristics and logistic regression analysis of risk factors; age posed a risk for sexual dysfunction, but duration of marriage, income, the number of children, educational level of woman and her husband, employment status, perceived economic condition, using method, and type of birth were determined not to pose a risk for sexual dysfunction Table 3

It was found that experiencing sexual dysfunction was correlated with women who had urinary incontinence problem, symptom of urinary tract infection, whose husband had premature ejaculation and erection problem, but there was no significant correlation between experiencing pain during sexual intercourse, having problem with husband, and premenstrual syndrome and sexual dysfunction Table 4.

Table 4.

Correlation of female sexual dysfunction with risk factors and logistic regression analysis

Descriptive
Characteristics
Sexual Dysfunction Significance test OR
95% confidence interval
Yes No
Experiencing urinary
incontinence
Yes
No
18 27.7
132 60.8
47 72.3
85 39.2
X2= 22.059
p: .000
.263 .131-.263
p: .000
Symptom of urinary tract
infection
Yes
No
31 41.3
119 57.5
44 58.7
88 42.5
X2= 5.770
p: .021
.766 .457–1.781
p: .766
Experiencing pain during
sexual intercourse
Yes
No
32 50.8
118 53.9
31 49.2
101 46.1
X2= .187
p: .670
1.255 645–2.439
p: .504
Premature ejaculation
problem of husband
Yes
No
16 36.4
134 56.5
28 63.6
10343.5
X2= 6.071
p: .020
.578 273–1.221
p: .151
Male erectile problem
Yes
No
6 30.0
144 55.0
14 70.0
118 45.0
X2= 4.650
p: .037
.526 .173–1.594
p: .256
Having problem with
husband
Yes
No
16 66.7
134 51.9
8 33.3
124 48.1
X2= 1.913
p: .202
2.589 .952–7.043
p: .062
Experiencing
premenstrual syndrome
Yes
No
52 49.1
98 55.7
54 50.9
78 44.3
X2= 1.166
p: .325
.832 .485–1.427
p: .504

According to correlation of female sexual dysfunction with risk factors and logistic regression analysis of risk factors; it was determined that those having urinary incontinence posed a risk for sexual dysfunction, but those who had symptom of urinary tract infection, had pain problem during sexual intercourse, whose husband had premature ejaculation and erection problem, who had problem with their husband and experiencing premenstrual syndrome did not have a risk for sexual dysfunction Table 4.

Discussion

Sexual dysfunction is an important community health problem that affects women more than men17. Sexual dysfunction is a multidisciplinary dysfunction, which affects the physical, mental and social condition of women1. Prevalence of SD in the present study was found as 53.2%. Prevalence of SD in previous studies conducted in Turkey was reported as 52.5%18, 46.9%19, and 48.3%15. In studies on different cultures, SD was similarly determined in 43% of women by Laumann et al.12, in 60% of Chinese women20, in 67.8% of Egyptian women between the ages 18–5521, in 13.3%-79.3% of Brazilian women21 in 56.8% of sexually active 5391 women aged between 40–59 years in Latin America22. In addition, numerous studies conducted on sexual dysfunction in Muslim countries show parallelism with findings from Turkey and European countries. It was found that 29.6% of Malay women5, 31.5% of Iranian women23, and 68.9% of Egyptian women experienced at least one or more sexual problem. Results of the study make us think that female sexual dysfunction is a common poblem. High incidence of SD in the present study might be caused by neglect of sexual dysfunction, conservative beliefs, and widespread lack of information about sexuality in Turkey.

It was determined in the literature that low education level increases the risk of sexual dysfunction.1,12,2426 In this study, along with a statistically significant correlation between the education level of women and their spouses and the level of sexual dysfunction occurrence, it was also stated that as education level increases, so does the frequency of sexual dysfunction occurrence. Results of the study conducted by İsmail et al.26 are similar to our ours, they both state that patients with a high education level exhibit a more frequent sexual dysfunction occurrence. In another study, when women with sexual dysfunction were compared with women who do not have sexual dysfunction, high education level was found to be the only criteria for the dysfunction.27 In Turkey, women with a high education level are employed in jobs with a high-stress level such as teachers and nurses. This chronic stress has a negative effect on gender and sexual hormones. 28 Furthermore, women with higher education level may have a tendency towards breaking the taboos and openly revealing their sexual problems.27

In the present study, using modern contraceptive methods was determined to influence development of SD. It is remarkable that results of study, in which correlation between using contraction and SD was investigated, in the literature were contradictory. While there was no significant correlation between using method and SD in some studies23,29 significant correlation was also found in some studies similar to results of the present study.20,30,31 Using contraception may reduce anxiety resulted from unintended pregnancy during sexual intercourse and may had a positive effect on woman's sexual function. Further research is required to confirm and explain the effect of using methods on sexuality.30

In the studies conducted previously, it was observed that as the age progresses, so does the risk of sexual dysfunction occurrence.1,17,30 In this study, along with a significant correlation between the age of women and the occurrence of sexual dysfunction, it was also stated that the frequency of sexual dysfunction occurrence decreases as the age progresses. Results of the study conducted by Fajewonyomi et al32 are similar to our ours, it was observed that younger women have a higher risk of sexual dysfunction occurrence. Increase in the sexual dysfunction occurrence with the progressing age is thought to be related with the hormonal changes during the menopause. With the reduced estrogen levels in the circulatory system, various levels of vaginal atrophy occur1,27,32 Physiological changes due to the progression of age do not necessarily mean that sexual intercourse is hard or impossible. Effects of age progression on sexual functions are mostly related to psychological, pharmacological and disease factors26,32.

Urinary incontinence UI has a negative effect on female sexuality33. In the study of Salonianın et al.34 the rate of sexual dysfunction was reported as 46% in women with UI. Being psychologically distressed, concerns about urinary incontinence during sexual intercourse, and feeling embarrassed because of smell have been indicated as the reason of sexual dysfunction33,35. In the present study, there was correlation between SD development and urinary incontinence, urinary incontinence was found as a risk factor for SD in logistic regression analysis carried out with other variables. It was reported in a previous study that sexual complaints were strongly correlated with UI, especially women with UI had lower libido, more vaginal dryness and dyspareunia complaint compared to those without UI36. Another study indicates that women with UI had low sexual activity37. In a study conducted by Zincir et al., it is stated that women with severe urinary incontinence have a low score in the Sexual Function Index for Women and poor sexual functions38. In a study conducted by Grzybowska et al.39 it is stated that women with severe and mid-level stress urinary incontinence have a poor sexual function quality. In a study conducted by Dos Santos et al.40 on nulliparous athletes, it is stated that women with urinary incontinence have 2.7 times more sexual desire problems, compared to women who do not have this problem. In current studies, the reason for positive correlation between SD and UI was indicated as the effect of UI on life quality, especially it posed a barrier on satisfaction of women, having coital incontinence, with sexual life. The correlation between SD and UI was reported to develop as a result of extremely active bladder, UI, and pelvic prolapse, in addition to hormone deficiencies that affect pelvic organs41.

Some characteristics and problems related to women's husband may be a risk factor towards SD. Jiann et al.42 determined that there was a significant correlation between male erectile disorder and female SD. Advanced age of husband17,43,44 premature ejaculation17,45 and erectile disorder17,23,45 are stated as risk factors for SD. In the present study, a significant correlation was found between having husband with premature ejaculation problem and erectile disorder and developing SD.

Another factor affecting prevalence of SD is type of birth. In this study, a significant correlation was determined between type of birth and SD. Results of some previous study showed similarity with results of the present study and while it was reported that delay for starting sexual intercourse, dyspareunia, and sexual problems were correlated with vaginal delivery with intervention, episiotomy etc., and type of birth increased these mentioned risks, had a negative effect on sexual activity.46,47 Some studies indicated that there was no significant correlation between type of birth and episiotomy with time of starting postpartum sexual intercourse, sexual satisfaction, arousal, frequency of sexual intercourse, and dyspareunia; and dyspareunia was correlated only with breastfeeding4850. Similarly, there are studies determining that a significant correlation was not found between sexual function with normal vaginal birth and cesarean section birth, women with cesarean section started postpartum sexual intercourse earlier than women who gave normal vaginal delivery and there was also variation between these correlations51.

In the present study, income was determined not to influence SD. Similar to result of the present study, there was no correlation between employment status, income and sexual function in the study of Elnashar et al.9 But, correlation was determined between economic status and sexual dysfunction in the study of Laumann et al.12 The reason behind why there was no correlation in Turkey might be associated with no huge difference in economic status of those in the study group.

Conclusion

These results indicate that SD is still common and is an important health problem. Therefore, it becomes crucial to evaluate symptoms and risk factors of SD, providing consultancy services about issues like preservation and treatment. Additionally, even though sexual health multi-dimensionally influences life of individuals, it is frequently ignored during the care given to patient. For this reason, maintaining sexual life which is a physiological need mostly stays in the background. Therefore, nurses, who are more together with individuals during health and every step of disease and treatment period, have important responsibilities especially about this issue. For this reason, it is recommended for nurses to play an active role in correct and sufficient data collection for sexual health history, evaluating the ratio of vulnerability of sexual health from disease period, providing an extensive care and diagnosing sexual problems and concerns. This way, it will contribute to improving life quality of women and preventing permanent health problems.

Limitations

There are some limitations to this study. First, the results obtained represent the women in the context of research and cannot be generalized. Second, the survey data were collected by face to face interviews. Asking questions about sexual life in our society, a topic may have been accepted as confidential, the replied reflect the current state of women working to take part. Therefore, the reliability of the data is limited to information provided by the interviewer.

Acknowledgments

Meral Kılıç would like to thank all of those who participated in this study.

Authors' contribution

MK was involved in study design, data collection, and manuscript development. MK, wrote the paper. MK performed the statistical analysis. MK read and approved the final manuscript

Abbreviations

SD: Sexual Dysfunction; FSF: Female Sexual Function Index; UI: Urinary İncontinence; FSD: Female Sexual Dysfunction

References

  • 1.Arafa AE, Elbahrawe RS, Shawky SM, Mostafa AM, Ahmed SS, El-Houfey AA, et al. Risk factors associated with female sexual dysfunction among married women in Upper Egypt; a cross sectional study. International Journal Of Community Medicine and Public Health. 2018;52:449–453. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kadri N, Alami KM, Tahiri SM. Sexual dysfunction in women: population based epidemiological study. Archives of Women's Mental Health. 2002;52:59–63. doi: 10.1007/s00737-002-0141-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lewis RW, Fugl-Meyer KS, Corona G, Hayes RD, Laumann EO, Moreira ED, Jr, et al. Definitions/epidemiology/risk factors for sexual dysfunction. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2010;74(pt2):1598–1607. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01778.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kingsberg SA, Woodard T. Female sexual dysfunction: focus on low desire. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2015;1252:477–486. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sidi H, Puteh SEW, Abdullah N, Midin M. ORIGINAL RESEARCH—EPIDEMIOLOGY: The Prevalence of Sexual Dysfunction and Potential Risk Factors That May Impair Sexual Function in Malaysian Women. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2007;42:311–321. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00319.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Furukawa AP, Patton PE, Amato P, Li H, Leclair CM. Dyspareunia and sexual dysfunction in women seeking fertility treatment. Fertility and Sterility. 2012;986:1544–1548. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.011. e2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Anastasiadis AG, Davis AR, Ghafar MA, Burchardt M, Shabsigh R. The epidemiology and definition of female sexual disorders. World Journal of Urology. 2002;202:74–78. doi: 10.1007/s00345-002-0272-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Basson R, Berman J, Burnett A, Derogatis L, Ferguson D, Fourcroy J, et al. Report of the international consensus development conference on female sexual dysfunction: Definitions and classifications. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 2001;272:83–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Elnashar A, El-Dien Ibrahim M, El-Desoky M, Ali O, El-Sayd Mohamed Hassan M. Female sexual dysfunction in Lower Egypt. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2007;1142:201–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01106.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Aslan E, Beji NK, Gungor I, Kadioglu A, Dikencik BK. Prevalence and risk factors for low sexual function in women: a study of 1,009 women in an outpatient clinic of a university hospital in Istanbul. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2008;59:2044–2052. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00873.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Walsh KE, Berman JR. Sexual dysfunction in the older woman. Drugs & Aging. 2004;2110:655–675. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200421100-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC. Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. JAMA. 1999;2816:537–544. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.6.537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Berman JR, Adhikari SP, Goldstein I. Anatomy and physiology of female sexual function and dysfunction. European Urology. 2000;381:20–29. doi: 10.1159/000020247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rosen CB, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D'Agostino R. The Female Sexual Function Index FSFI: a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 2000;262:191–208. doi: 10.1080/009262300278597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Oksuz E, Malhan S. Prevalence and risk factors for female sexual dysfunction in Turkish women. The Journal of Urology. 2006;1752:654–658. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00149-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R. The female sexual function index FSFI: cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 2005;311:1–20. doi: 10.1080/00926230590475206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ibrahim ZM, Ahmed MR, Ahmed WAS. Prevalence and risk factors for female sexual dysfunction among Egyptian women. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2013;2876:1173–1180. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2677-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Çayan S, Yaman Ö, Orhan İ, Usta M, Başar M, Resim S, et al. Prevalence of Sexual Dysfunction and Urinary Incontinence and Associated Risk Factors in Turkish Women. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cayan S, Akbay E, Bozlu M, Canpolat B, lent u, Acar D, et al. The prevalence of female sexual dysfunction and potential risk factors that may impair sexual function in Turkish women. Urologia Internationalis. 2004;721:52–57. doi: 10.1159/000075273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Du J, Ruan X, Gu M, Bitzer J, Mueck AO. Prevalence of and risk factors for sexual dysfunction in young Chinese women according to the Female Sexual Function Index: an internet-based survey. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. 2016;213:259–263. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2016.1165198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wolpe RE, Zomkowski K, Silva FP, Queiroz APA, Sperandio FF. Prevalence of female sexual dysfunction in Brazil: A systematic review. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2017;211:26–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Blümel JE, Chedraui P, Baron G, Belzares E, Bencosme A, Calle A, et al. Sexual dysfunction in middle-aged women: a multicenter Latin American study using the Female Sexual Function Index. Menopause. 2009;166:1139–1148. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181a4e317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Safarinejad M. Female sexual dysfunction in a population-based study in Iran: prevalence and associated risk factors. International Journal of Impotence Research. 2006;184:382. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Çayan S, Yaman Ö, Orhan İ, Usta M, Başar M, Resim S, et al. Prevalence of sexual dysfunction and urinary incontinence and associated risk factors in Turkish women. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2016;203:303–308. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vahdaninia M, Montazeri A, Goshtasebi A. Help-seeking behaviors for female sexual dysfunction: a cross sectional study from Iran. BMC Women's Health. 2009;91:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-9-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ismail SA, Abdel-Azim NE, Habib D, Zaky M, Saleh MA, Abbas AM. Prevalence, Risk Factors and Women's Attitude towards Female Sexual Dysfunction in Upper Egypt: Hospital based study. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mostafa AM, Khamis Y, Helmy HK, Arafa AE, Abbas AM. Prevalence and patterns of female sexual dysfunction among overweight and obese premenopausal women in Upper Egypt; a cross sectional study. Middle East Fertility Society Journal. 2018;231:68–71. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hamilton LD, Meston CM. Chronic stress and sexual function in women. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2013;1010:2443–2454. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Emel E, Belgin A, Arslan SY, BİLGİLİ N. Sağlıklı kadınlarda cinsel fonksiyon bozukluğu sıklığı ve risk faktörleri. TÜBAV Bilim Dergisi. 2010;31:137–144. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Aslan E, Beji N, Gungor I, Kadioglu A, Dikencik B. Re: Prevalence and risk factors for low sexual function in women: A study of 1,009 women in an outpatient clinic of a university hospital in Istanbul—A response. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2009;65:1491–1492. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01259.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wallwiener CW, Wallwiener LM, Seeger H, Mück AO, Bitzer J, Wallwiener M. Prevalence of sexual dysfunction and impact of contraception in female German medical students. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2010;76:2139–2148. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01742.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fajewonyomi BA, Orji EO, Adeyemo AO. Sexual dysfunction among female patients of reproductive age in a hospital setting in Nigeria. Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition. 2007;251:101. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Aslan G, Köseo lu H, Sadik Ö, Gimen S, Cihan A, Esen A. Sexual function in women with urinary incontinence. International Journal of Impotence Research. 2005;173:248. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Salonia A, Zanni G, Nappi RE, Briganti A, Dehò F, Fabbri F, et al. Sexual dysfunction is common in women with lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary incontinence: results of a cross-sectional study. European urology. 2004;455:642–648. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.11.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Caruso S, Brescia R, Matarazzo MG, Giunta G, Rapisarda AMC, Cianci A. Effects of Urinary Incontinence Subtypes on Women's Sexual Function and Quality of Life. Urology. 2017;108:59–64. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.06.025. PubMed. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Handa VL, Harvey L, Cundiff GW, Siddique SA, Kjerulff KH. Sexual function among women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004;1913:751–756. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Karbage SA, Santos ZM, Frota MA, de Moura HJ, Vasconcelos CT, Neto JAV, et al. Quality of life of Brazilian women with urinary incontinence and the impact on their sexual function. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2016;201:56–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.03.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zincir H, Demir G, Ozen B. Sexual Dysfunction in Married Women With Urinary Incontinence. Urology Journal. 2018;154:193–198. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4006. PubMed. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Grzybowska ME, Wydra D. Predictors of sexual function in women with stress urinary incontinence. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2018;372:861–868. doi: 10.1002/nau.23370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.dos Santos KM, Da Roza T, da Silva LL, Wolpe RE, da Silva Honório GJ, da Luz SCT. Female sexual function and urinary incontinence in nulliparous athletes: An exploratory study. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2018;33:21–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.El Atrash G, Ali MH, Abdelwahab HA, Abdelreheem LA, Shamaa M. The assessment of sexual dysfunction in Egyptian women with lower urinary tract symptoms. Arab Journal of Urology. 2014;123:234–238. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2014.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jiann BP, Su CC, Yu CC, Wu TT, Huang JK. Risk factors for individual domains of female sexual function. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2009;612:3364–3375. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01494.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hassanin IM, Helmy YA, Fathalla MM, Shahin AY. Prevalence and characteristics of female sexual dysfunction in a sample of women from Upper Egypt. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2010;1083:219–223. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.09.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jaafarpour M, Khani A, Khajavikhan J, Suhrabi Z. Female sexual dysfunction: prevalence and risk factors. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research JCDR. 2013;712:2877. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6813.3822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhang H, Yip PS. Female sexual dysfunction among young and middle-aged women in Hong Kong: Prevalence and risk factors. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2012;911:2911–2918. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02773.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Baksu B, Davas I, Agar E, Akyol A, Varolan A. The effect of mode of delivery on postpartum sexual functioning in primiparous women. International Urogynecology Journal. 2007;184:401–406. doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0156-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Safarinejad MR, Kolahi AA, Hosseini L. COUPLES'SEXUAL DYSFUNCTIONS: The Effect of the Mode of Delivery on the Quality of Life, Sexual Function, and Sexual Satisfaction in Primiparous Women and Their Husbands. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2009;66:1645–1667. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01232.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chien L-Y, Tai C-J, Hwang F-M, Huang C-M. Postpartum physical symptoms and depressive symptomatology at 1 month and 1 year after delivery: A longitudinal questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2009;469:1201–1208. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Barrett G, Pendry E, Peacock J, Victor C, Thakar R, Manyonda I. Women's sexual health after childbirth. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2000;1072:186–195. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11689.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lurie S, Aizenberg M, Sulema V, Boaz M, Kovo M, Golan A, et al. Sexual function after childbirth by the mode of delivery: a prospective study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2013;2884:785–792. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2846-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Glazener CM. Sexual function after childbirth: women's experiences, persistent morbidity and lack of professional recognition. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 1997;1043:330–335. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11463.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from African Health Sciences are provided here courtesy of Makerere University Medical School

RESOURCES