Cyanobacteria are a major force for primary production via oxygenic photosynthesis in the ocean. A marine cyanobacterium, PCC7002, is actively involved in sulfide metabolism. It uses SQR to detoxify exogenous sulfide, enabling it to survive better than its Δsqr mutant in sulfide-rich environments. PCC7002 also uses SQR to oxidize endogenously generated sulfide to S0, which is required for the proper expression of key genes involved in photosynthesis. Thus, SQR has at least two physiological functions in PCC7002. The observation provides a new perspective for the interplays of C and S cycles.
KEYWORDS: sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase, persulfide dioxygenase, cyanobacteria, H2S detoxification, sulfane sulfur
ABSTRACT
Eutrophication and deoxygenation possibly occur in coastal waters due to excessive nutrients from agricultural and aquacultural activities, leading to sulfide accumulation. Cyanobacteria, as photosynthetic prokaryotes, play significant roles in carbon fixation in the ocean. Although some cyanobacteria can use sulfide as the electron donor for photosynthesis under anaerobic conditions, little is known on how they interact with sulfide under aerobic conditions. In this study, we report that Synechococcus sp. strain PCC7002 (PCC7002), harboring an sqr gene encoding sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase (SQR), oxidized self-produced sulfide to S0, present as persulfide and polysulfide in the cell. The Δsqr mutant contained less cellular S0 and had increased expression of key genes involved in photosynthesis, but it was less competitive than the wild type in cocultures. Further, PCC7002 with SQR and persulfide dioxygenase (PDO) oxidized exogenous sulfide to tolerate high sulfide levels. Thus, SQR offers some benefits to cyanobacteria even under aerobic conditions, explaining the common presence of SQR in cyanobacteria.
INTRODUCTION
Oxygen contents in the ocean have been declining during the past decades (1, 2), and the oxygen minimum zones (OMZs) where oxygen level is low or zero, are spreading (3, 4). With ocean warming, decreased solubility of O2 and increased biological activities, including photosynthesis and respiration, lead to the expansion of OMZs (5). Eutrophication induced by excessive nutrient input coming from agriculture and aquaculture is a common phenomenon in coastal waters (6), contributing to the expansion of OMZs. Nutrient enrichment via natural processes such as coastal upwelling may also be associated with deoxygenation (7). Hypoxia has serious impacts on marine ecosystems (8, 9). The sporadic accumulation of sulfide (H2S, HS−, and S2−) in OMZs is also a noticeable aspect of hypoxia hazards (10, 11).
The toxic effect of sulfide is well known, inhibiting respiration by acting on cytochrome c oxidase in heterotrophic bacteria (12–15) and photosynthesis by binding to metalloproteins of photosynthesis system II (PSII) (16–19). Sulfide can reach high concentrations in specific habitats, such as hydrothermal vents and seeps (10) and coastal mudflats (11). Sulfide is mainly derived from sulfate as the terminal electron acceptor for organic mineralization by sulfur-reducing bacteria in OMZs (10).
Sulfide is easily oxidized under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Chemolithotrophic bacteria oxidize it under aerobic conditions, while sulfur-dependent photosynthetic bacteria oxidize it under anaerobic conditions, using the generated electrons for anaerobic photosynthesis (20–22). Recently, mammalian mitochondria and heterotrophic bacteria were reported to oxidize sulfide via a pathway involving two key enzymes, sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase (SQR) and persulfide dioxygenase (PDO) (23, 24). SQR oxidizes sulfide to polysulfide, which spontaneously reacts with glutathione (GSH) to produce glutathione persulfide (GSSH); PDO oxidizes GSSH to sulfite, which spontaneously reacts with polysulfide to produce thiosulfate (25). This pathway is common in heterotrophic bacteria (21).
SQRs are widely distributed in microorganisms as well as in animal mitochondria (21, 26, 27). SQR oxidizes sulfide to polysulfide and transfers electrons into the electron transport chain in mitochondria (28), heterotrophic bacteria (21), chemolithotrophic bacteria (29, 30), and photolithotrophic bacteria (27, 31, 32). SQRs are grouped into six types based on sequence and structural analyses (33, 34). Besides being further oxidized, polysulfide (H2Sn) can be converted into other forms of cellular sulfane sulfur, including protein presulfidation at Cys residues in bacteria (35). Sulfane sulfur is zero valence sulfur in various forms, such as persulfide (RSSH), polysulfide (RSSnH and RSSnR, n ≥ 2), and elemental sulfur. Sulfane sulfur can act as either an electrophile or a nucleophile (36). The nucleophilic property allows cells to resist reactive oxygen species, and the electrophilic property causes protein persulfidation, affecting enzyme activities or signaling (37, 38).
The cyanobacteria play a vital role in global primary production as the most ancient and abundant phytoplankton in the ocean (39, 40). Cyanobacteria possess both photosynthesis system I (PSI) and photosynthesis system II (PSII), and they usually perform oxygenic photosynthesis but can do anoxygenic photosynthesis (41, 42). They are effective participants in marine carbon cycles (43). Cyanobacteria are found to inhabit multiple marine habitats, and Synechococcus spp. dominate the picocyanobacterial communities in eutrophic coastal and mesotrophic open ocean waters (44, 45). In some habitats, they will encounter sulfide. The sulfur cycle is generally coupled with the carbon cycle (46–48); however, it is still unclear how sulfide affects Synechococcus spp. and how they deal with it.
Here, we report that Synechococcus sp. strain PCC7002 (PCC7002) used SQR to oxidize self-produced sulfide to polysulfide, maintaining a relatively high level of cellular sulfane sulfur, which offers growth advantages to the wild type over the Δsqr mutant. Further, PCC7002 also survived better in sulfide-rich environments via the detoxification role of SQR and PDO. The two enzymes collectively oxidize sulfide to sulfite and thiosulfate, resembling the newly reported pathway in heterotrophic bacteria (25).
RESULTS
PCC7002 uses SQR to oxidize endogenous sulfide.
PCC7002 contains one sqr gene (CyanoBase: SYNPCC7002_G0075), encoding a type I SQR. To generate the Δsqr mutant (see Table S1 in the supplemental material), the gene was replaced with a kanamycin resistance gene via homologous recombination (Fig. S1). The mutant was complemented with the sqr gene inserted on the chromosome of the mutant at a neutral site (CyanoBase: SYNPCC7002_A0933) (Table S1). The wild type and the complementation strain PCC7002 Δsqr::sqr did not accumulate sulfide, but the mutant did (Fig. 1A). We also checked cellular sulfane sulfur contents by using sulfane sulfur probe 4 (SSP4), which releases a fluorescent compound after reacting with sulfane sulfur (49). The Δsqr mutant contained a sharply decreased level of cellular sulfane sulfur in comparison with the wild type and PCC7002 Δsqr::sqr (Fig. 1B). The results indicate that PCC7002 uses SQR to oxidize endogenously produced sulfide, allowing the bacterium to keep a relatively high level of cellular sulfane sulfur.
PCC7002 has a competitive advantage over the Δsqr mutant in coculture.
To investigate the effect of SQR, we monitored the growth and photosynthesis of the wild type and the Δsqr mutant. The deletion of sqr had no effect on the growth of PCC7002 (Fig. S2). We then cocultured PCC7002 and PCC7002Δsqr to access their competitive capacity. The relative abundance of PCC7002 and PCC7002Δsqr in the coculturing system was detected by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) with specific primer pairs (Table S2). Different ratios of PCC7002 and PCC7002Δsqr were mixed, and the qRT-PCR results correlated with the ratios accordingly (Fig. S3), confirming the approach. PCC7002 and PCC7002Δsqr showed little difference in the coculture system during the initial 48 h; however, the advantage of the wild type became apparent after continuous transfer (Fig. 1C). We also cultured PCC7002 and PCC7002Δsqr separately using the same method, but results showed no difference between the wild type and the mutant (Fig. S4).
The effects of sqr inactivation on the photosynthesis process.
The photosynthesis parameters of the wild type and the Δsqr mutant were tested. The Δsqr mutant had a higher oxygen evolution rate than that of the wild type (Fig. 2A). The increased oxygen evolution rate upon the Δsqr mutant was consistent with an acceleration of H2O oxidation to make up for the loss of H2S oxidation. The maximal PSII quantum yield was calculated as Fv/Fm, a measure of the conversion efficiency of the light energy of the PSII reaction center. Here, the Fv/Fm value showed little difference between the wild type and the mutant (Fig. 2B). The relative electron transport rate (rETR) increased in the mutant (Fig. 2C). Thus, photosynthesis efficiency was increased in the Δsqr mutant. However, the apparently increased efficiency in photosynthesis did not affect the growth (Fig. S2). We then checked the expression levels of major genes involved in photosynthesis in the wild type and the Δsqr mutant. PCC7002 had three psbA genes, encoding the isoforms of D1 protein, a key protein of the PSII core, and the isoforms allowed cyanobacteria to adapt to different light intensities. The expression levels of psbA1, psbA2, and psbA3 were all upregulated (1.5- to 2-fold) in the Δsqr mutant (Fig. S5). The rbcX, rbcL, and rbcS genes encoding RuBisCO and the tkt gene encoding transketolase of the Calvin-Benson-Bassham (CBB) cycle all showed apparent transcriptional increases (>2-fold) in the Δsqr mutant in comparison with the wild type (Fig. 2D). The mRNA level of petA encoding apocytochrome f precursor increased by 1.8-fold, and the transcripts of petC encoding a Rieske-FeS protein increased by 1.5-fold in the Δsqr mutant. However, the transcripts of the petB gene encoding cytochrome b6 showed little change (Fig. S5). Overall, the qRT-PCR results indicated that the inactivation of sqr in PCC7002 affected many physiological processes, including PSII, the CBB cycle, and the photosynthetic electron transport chain (Fig. 2D and Fig. S5).
SQR plays a detoxification role in PCC7002.
We treated the wild type, the Δsqr mutant, and the complementation strain with different concentrations of NaHS for 6 h and then washed, diluted, and inoculated cells onto the A+ medium for incubation under 50 μmol photons m−2 s−1 at 30°C. Without sulfide, all the three strains grew well on the A+ agar plate. After treatment with 3 mM NaHS, the Δsqr mutant grew worse than the wild type and the complementation strain (Fig. 3A). The growth of the Δsqr mutant was fully inhibited while the wild type and the complementation strain were partly inhibited after treatment with 4 mM and 5 mM NaHS.
Whether PCC7002 oxidized exogenous sulfide was also tested. Cells at log phase of growth (optical density at 730 nm [OD730] = 1) were harvested and resuspended in 50 mM Tris buffer (pH 8.0) at an OD730 of 8. Without induction, all the three strains (PCC7002, PCC7002Δsqr, and PCC7002Δsqr::sqr) showed no oxidation activity (data not shown). After induction with 2 mM NaHS for 6 h, cell suspensions of the wild type and the complementation strain showed apparent activity with about 500 μM NaHS being fully oxidized in 8 h (Fig. 3B). However, the Δsqr mutant showed a similar oxidation rate as the buffer control (Fig. 3B). Thus, SQR plays a detoxification role in PCC7002 by oxidizing excessive sulfide.
Recombinant Escherichia coli with SQR and PDO from PCC7002 oxidized sulfide to sulfite and thiosulfate.
PCC7002 also has a persulfide dioxygenase (PDO). We constructed recombinant strains E. coli(pBBR5-sqr), containing only sqr, and E. coli(pBBR5-sqr-pdo), containing both sqr and pdo. The cell suspensions of E. coli(pBBR5-sqr) rapidly oxidized 500 μM sulfide to about 250 μM polysulfide in 20 min with no apparent production of sulfite and thiosulfate (Fig. 4A to D). E. coli(pBBR5-sqr-pdo) oxidized 500 μM sulfide to about 22 μM sulfite and 205 μM thiosulfate with elevated levels of polysulfide (>50 μM) (Fig. 4A to D). The results were similar to recombinant E. coli with sqr and pdo from heterotrophic bacteria (25).
The presence of sqr and pdo in cyanobacteria.
The previously reported SQRs and PDOs were used to search for potential SQRs and PDOs from 130 sequenced cyanobacterial genomes (NCBI database, updated to 17 June 2019) (21). Sixty-seven SQRs from 59 cyanobacterial genomes and 101 PDOs from 85 cyanobacterial genomes were identified after checking via phylogenetic analysis; 54 genomes possessed both SQRs and PDOs (Fig. 5). All the cyanobacterial SQRs belonged to the type I and type II SQRs (Fig. S6).
DISCUSSION
Our data indicate two physiological roles of SQR in PCC7002 (Fig. 6). First, SQR oxidizes endogenous H2S to polysulfide, which makes PCC7002 more competitive in coculture of the wild type and the Δsqr mutant (Fig. 1). It is likely that polysulfide is converted to other species of cellular sulfane sulfur, participating in the regulation of key genes of photosynthesis as a signaling molecular. H2S has been proposed as a signaling molecule in bacteria since 2006 (50). Recently, it was shown that the signaling role of H2S is via sulfane sulfur, which is sensed by gene regulators that activate the genes involved in H2S oxidation in bacteria (51–53). OxyR also senses high levels of cellular sulfane sulfur to produce enzymes for its removal (54). Our evidence suggests that sulfane sulfur is likely involved in regulating photosynthetic genes (Fig. 2D; see also Fig. S5 in the supplemental material).
Second, SQR plays a detoxification role. Sulfide may accumulate at high concentrations in OMZs (10). With SQR, PCC7002 survives better than the Δsqr mutant in the presence of high concentrations of sulfide (Fig. 3A). The detoxification also requires PDO that prevents the excessive accumulation of polysulfide, and the sulfide oxidation pathway is the same as in heterotrophic bacteria (25). Bioinformatics analysis shows that about 45% of the sequenced cyanobacterial genomes contain SQR (Fig. 5), while only 21% of the sequenced bacterial genomes contain SQR (21), indicating the wide distribution and importance of SQR in cyanobacteria. Thus, SQR may facilitate PCC7002 and possibly other cyanobacteria to adapt to changing environments and increase their growth fitness.
SQR may have a third role in cyanobacteria, allowing them to use H2S as the electron donor for photosynthesis. In the sulfur photosynthetic bacteria, SQR oxidizes H2S and passes the electrons to drive anaerobic photosynthesis (52). Some cyanobacteria also perform anoxygenic photosynthesis in sulfide-rich environments (18, 31, 41), partly because sulfide is a better electron donor and partly because sulfide at high concentrations inhibits photosystem II (16). We observed that the Δsqr mutant had a higher oxygen evolution rate than that of the wild type (Fig. 2A). The observation may be a result of increased expression of photosynthetic genes or the oxidation of endogenously produced sulfide by SQR. Further investigation is needed to clarify whether sulfide provides electrons for photosynthesis under aerobic conditions. The physiological roles of SQR reported here may guide the investigation of cyanobacteria in ecological niches with varied O2 and sulfide contents, as many sequenced cyanobacterial genomes contain SQR (Fig. 5).
The source of endogenous H2S in PCC7002 is likely from the metabolism of cysteine or homocysteine, similar to H2S production by heterotrophic bacteria during normal growth (21), or from assimilatory sulfate reduction (55). The endogenous H2S has been shown to act as a signal molecule at low concentrations (12). Cellular sulfane sulfur, including polysulfide and GSSH, is believed to be the actual mediator of H2S signaling (56–59); sulfane sulfur can also protect Escherichia coli cells from oxidative stress (35).
When SQR is inactivated in PCC7002, an interesting phenomenon is that the growth advantage of PCC7002 occurs only in the coculture process (Fig. 1C and Fig. S2). This may be caused by the intracellular polysulfide coming from endogenous H2S oxidation by SQR. The mutant contains less sulfane sulfur (Fig. 1B) but has increased oxygen evolution rates and rETRs with elevated expression of photosynthesis genes (Fig. 2). The gene expression variation between the mutant and the wild type may also be a result of the lowered sulfane sulfur in the mutant, as sulfane sulfur is a known signaling molecule participating in many physiological processes in eukaryotes (58). And from our results, we infer that carbon and sulfur metabolisms can be linked via sulfane sulfur just like carbon and nitrogen metabolisms in cyanobacteria (60, 61). As we know, sulfane sulfur can perform as a reductant to help relieve oxidative stress (35, 37). Here, increased photosynthesis efficiency with lower sulfane sulfur content in the Δsqr mutant may cause oxidative stress (62), thus making it less competitive in coculture. However, it is unclear how polysulfide regulates key genes involved in photosynthesis processes, such as PSII, the CBB cycle, and photosynthesis electron transport.
In summary, SQR helps PCC7002 to convert endogenous H2S to polysulfide, which is used to maintain a relatively high level of cellular sulfane sulfur, and to detoxify exogenous H2S. The relatively high cellular sulfane sulfur offers the wild type a growth advantage over the Δsqr mutant in a mixed culture. The detoxification role of SQR may enable PCC7002 to survive better in OMZs, thus helping relieve deoxygenation by generating more O2. Thus, sulfide oxidation plays a vital role in the adaption process of PCC7002 and possibly other cyanobacteria. We present a new perspective for understanding the coupling of carbon and sulfur cycles, which are key components of the marine biogeochemical cycle.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains and culture conditions.
PCC7002 cultures were grown in conical flasks containing medium A, supplemented with 1 mg of NaNO3 ml−1 (designated medium A+) (63) under continuous illumination of 50 μmol photons m−2 s−1 at 30°C. Glycerol (10 mM) was added as a supplement in the A+ medium to serve as the carbon and energy source. For mutant strains, the concentrations of appropriate antibiotics required by the mutant strains were as following: 100 g/ml kanamycin and 20 g/ml chloramphenicol. E. coli was cultured in LB medium at 37°C. The strains and plasmids used in this paper are all listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material.
Strain construction.
The Δsqr mutant of PCC7002 was constructed by homologous recombination. Two gene segments immediately upstream and downstream of the sqr gene (CyanoBase: SYNPCC7002_G0075), about 1,000 bp long, were amplified by PCR from genomic DNA of the wild-type strain with the primer sets sqr-del-1/sqr-del-2 and sqr-del-5/sqr-del-6 (Table S2). A kanamycin resistance cartridge was excised from the plasmid pET30a with the primers sqr-del-3/sqr-del-4. All the above three fragments were joined via fusion PCR, with the kanamycin resistance cartridge in the middle. Then, the fusion fragment was cloned into pJET1.2 blunt vector (Thermo, Beijing, China). The sqr gene was inserted at neutral site 1 (CyanoBase: SYNPCC7002_A0933) of PCC7002 to form the complementation strain (64). Wild-type cells were transformed with these constructs, and transformants were selected using appropriate antibiotics. The primers used in this paper are all listed in Table S2.
The sqr gene and pdo gene (CyanoBase: SYNPCC7002_A2866) of PCC7002 were also cloned and expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3). The fragment of sqr was amplified from the PCC7002 genome using primers pbr-sqr-F and pbr-sqr-R (listed in Table S1) containing 20-bp extensions overlapping the adjacent fragment. The sqr fragment was cloned into the plasmid pBBR1mcs-5 (pBBR5) by using the TEDA assembly (65). The plasmid pBBR5-sqr-pdo containing both sqr and pdo was constructed using the same protocol with primers listed in Table S1. The two plasmids pBBR5-sqr and pBBR5-sqr-pdo were transformed to E. coli BL21(DE3).
Sulfide accumulation detection.
The method used for the detection of sulfide accumulation was the same as described previously (65, 66). PCC7002 cultures were transferred into 3 ml of A+ medium in a 15-ml glass tube and incubated with shaking for 96 h with lead acetate [Pb(Ac)2] paper strips at the top of the tube, which would turn black in the presence of sulfide as the production of PbS black precipitates.
Toxicity analysis of sulfide.
PCC7002 and its mutants at log phase at an OD730 of 0.6 to 0.7 were treated with 3 mM, 4 mM, or 5 mM NaHS for 6 h in the sealed tubes. After incubation, cells were washed and resuspended in fresh A+ medium. The cells were diluted with A+ medium at an OD730 of 0.05, and 10 μl was placed on the A+ agar plate. The differences between PCC7002 and its mutants appeared after cultivation at 30°C under continuous illumination of 50 μmol photons · m−2 · s−1 for 7 days.
Sulfide oxidation and product analysis.
Sulfide oxidation by PCC7002 and its mutants was assayed. Cells were harvested after induction with 2 mM NaHS for 6 h at log phase. They were resuspended in 50 mM Tris buffer (pH 8.0) at an OD730 of 8 after being washed twice with the same buffer. The reaction was performed in 30-ml serum bottles sealed with a rubber stopper to minimize the loss of sulfide. NaHS (0.5 mM) was added to the bottle to initiate the reaction.
Sulfide oxidation by recombinant E.coli was similar, but cells were harvested and resuspended to an OD600 of 2. The concentrations of sulfide, polysulfide, sulfite, and thiosulfate were analyzed as described previously (25, 66). Briefly, sulfide was detected by a colorimetric method; polysulfide, sulfite, and thiosulfate were derivatized with monobromobimane and then measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with a fluorescence detector.
Competition experiment.
PCC7002 and PCC7002Δsqr at log phase with an OD730 of 0.6 to 0.7 were transferred to fresh A+ medium to a final concentration with an OD730 of 0.05 each as a mixture. The total genomic DNA of the mixed culture was extracted and used as the template for real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis after culturing for 48 h. The abundance of the sqr gene was used as the marker for the relative abundance of PCC7002, and the abundance of the kan gene was used for PCC7002Δsqr, in which the sqr gene was replaced by the kan gene. Then, the mixed culture was transferred to fresh A+ medium at an OD730 of 0.05 for another 48 h and analysis. The mixing of two strains at equal cell numbers was defined as the first transfer. The mixture was transferred 4 times.
Endogenous sulfane sulfur analysis.
Sulfane sulfur probe 4 (SSP4) was used to detect endogenous sulfane sulfur as previously described (35, 49). Cells were harvested, washed, and resuspended in 50 mM Tris buffer (pH 8.0). Cells were disrupted by ultrasonication, and debris was removed by centrifugation at 12,500 × g for 10 min. SSP4 (10 μM) was added to the supernatant and incubated in the dark at 30°C for 15 min. The fluorescence resulting from the SSP4 reaction with sulfane sulfur was detected with excitation of 482 nm and emission of 515 nm by using a Synergy H1 microplate reader. The fluorescence values were expressed as the intensity per milligram of protein.
Oxygen evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence assay.
Cells at log phase with an OD730 of 0.6 to 0.7 were collected for oxygen evolution measurement via a Clark oxygen electrode (Chlorolab 2+; Hansatech, Norfolk, United Kingdom). The samples were illuminated under continuous stirring (900 rpm) at 30°C with increasing light intensities (from 0 to 1,000 μmol photons m−2 s−1). The rate of oxygen evolution was recorded continuously for 2 min at each light level. The oxygen evolution rate was then normalized to OD730.
Chlorophyll fluorescence was measured by a lightweight, hand-held fluorometer (AP-C 100; AquaPen, Drasov, Czech Republic). Cells at log phase with an OD730 of 0.6 to 0.7 were collected and then adapted to darkness for half an hour. Fv/Fm and rETR were all automatically detected by AP-C 100.
RNA extraction and qRT-PCR analysis.
Cells at log phase with an OD73 of 0.6 to 0.7 were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000 × g, 4°C, for 10 min. Total RNA was isolated by using the TaKaRa MiniBEST universal RNA extraction kit, and the concentration of RNA was verified by Qubit 4 (Thermo Fisher). The cDNA was acquired by using the Prime Script RT reagent kit with genomic DNA (gDNA) eraser (TaKaRa, Beijing, China). The SYBR Premix Ex Taq II kit (TaKaRa) was used for qRT-PCR, and the reactions were run in a Light Cycler 480 II sequence detection system (Roche, Shanghai, China). Primers for target genes are all shown in Table S1, and rnpA (SYNPCC7002_A0989) was used as the reference gene (67). The results were analyzed according to the threshold cycle (2−ΔΔCT) method (68).
Bioinformatics analysis.
One hundred thirty cyanobacterial genomes were downloaded from the NCBI database (update to 17 June 2019). The query sequences of SQR and PDO were based on our previous work (21). The SQR and PDO candidates were obtained by searching the database with the standalone BLASTP algorithm, using conventional criteria (E value of ≤1e−5, coverage of ≥45%, and identity of ≥30%). The candidates were analyzed by using ClustalW for alignment and MEGA 7.0 for neighbor-joining tree building with the following parameters: pairwise deletion, p-distance distribution, and bootstrap analysis of 1,000 repeats (69). The candidates in the same clade as the seeds were selected. The published flavocytochrome c sulfide dehydrogenase (FCSD) sequences were used as the outgroup of SQR, and the GloB (GloB hydroxyacylglutathione hydrolase) sequences were used as the outgroup of PDO.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was financially supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 91751207) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2016YFA0601103).
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
This article is a direct contribution from Nianzhi Jiao, a Fellow of the American Academy of Microbiology, who arranged for and secured reviews by Cheng-Cai Zhang, The Chinese Academy of Sciences; Douglas Campbell, CRC in Phytoplankton Ecophysiology, Mount Allison University; and Ping Xu, State Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic & Developmental Sciences, and School of Life Sciences & Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Citation Liu D, Zhang J, Lü C, Xia Y, Liu H, Jiao N, Xun L, Liu J. 2020. Synechococcus sp. strain PCC7002 uses sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase to detoxify exogenous sulfide and to convert endogenous sulfide to cellular sulfane sulfur. mBio 11:e03420-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.03420-19.
REFERENCES
- 1.Schmidtko S, Stramma L, Visbeck M. 2017. Decline in global oceanic oxygen content during the past five decades. Nature 542:335–339. doi: 10.1038/nature21399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Breitburg D, Levin LA, Oschlies A, Gregoire M, Chavez FP, Conley DJ, Garcon V, Gilbert D, Gutierrez D, Isensee K, Jacinto GS, Limburg KE, Montes I, Naqvi SWA, Pitcher GC, Rabalais NN, Roman MR, Rose KA, Seibel BA, Telszewski M, Yasuhara M, Zhang J. 2018. Declining oxygen in the global ocean and coastal waters. Science 359:eaam7240. doi: 10.1126/science.aam7240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shepherd JG, Brewer PG, Oschlies A, Watson AJ. 2017. Ocean ventilation and deoxygenation in a warming world: introduction and overview. Philos Trans R Soc A 375:20170240. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Stramma L, Prince ED, Schmidtko S, Luo J, Hoolihan JP, Visbeck M, Wallace DWR, Brandt P, Körtzinger A. 2012. Expansion of oxygen minimum zones may reduce available habitat for tropical pelagic fishes. Nat Clim Chang 2:33–37. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1304. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Keeling RE, Körtzinger A, Gruber N. 2010. Ocean deoxygenation in a warming world. Annu Rev Mar Sci 2:199–229. doi: 10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Diaz RJ, Rosenberg R. 2008. Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science 321:926–929. doi: 10.1126/science.1156401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Grantham BA, Chan F, Nielsen KJ, Fox DS, Barth JA, Huyer A, Lubchenco J, Menge BA. 2004. Upwelling-driven nearshore hypoxia signals ecosystem and oceanographic changes in the northeast Pacific. Nature 429:749–754. doi: 10.1038/nature02605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McCormick LR, Levin LA. 2017. Physiological and ecological implications of ocean deoxygenation for vision in marine organisms. Philos Trans R Soc A 375:20160322. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gobler CJ, Baumann H. 2016. Hypoxia and acidification in ocean ecosystems: coupled dynamics and effects on marine life. Biol Lett 12:20150976. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schunck H, Lavik G, Desai DK, Großkopf T, Kalvelage T, Löscher CR, Paulmier A, Contreras S, Siegel H, Holtappels M, Rosenstiel P, Schilhabel MB, Graco M, Schmitz RA, Kuypers MMM, Laroche J. 2013. Giant hydrogen sulfide plume in the oxygen minimum zone off Peru supports chemolithoautotrophy. PLoS One 8:e68661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Joyner-Matos J, Predmore BL, Stein JR, Leeuwenburgh C, Julian D. 2010. Hydrogen sulfide induces oxidative damage to RNA and DNA in a sulfide-tolerant marine invertebrate. Physiol Biochem Zool 83:356–365. doi: 10.1086/597529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cuevasanta E, Moller MN, Alvarez B. 2017. Biological chemistry of hydrogen sulfide and persulfides. Arch Biochem Biophys 617:9–25. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2016.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bouillaud F, Blachier F. 2011. Mitochondria and sulfide: a very old story of poisoning, feeding, and signaling? Antioxid Redox Signal 15:379–391. doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Malone Rubright SL, Pearce LL, Peterson J. 2017. Environmental toxicology of hydrogen sulfide. Nitric Oxide 71:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2017.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Grieshaber MK, Volkel S. 1998. Animal adaptations for tolerance and exploitation of poisonous sulfide. Annu Rev Physiol 60:33–53. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.60.1.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Miller SR, Bebout BM. 2004. Variation in sulfide tolerance of photosystem II in phylogenetically diverse cyanobacteria from sulfidic habitats. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:736–744. doi: 10.1128/aem.70.2.736-744.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Oren A, Padan E, Malkin S. 1979. Sulfide inhibition of photosystem II in cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) and tobacco chloroplasts. Biochim Biophys Acta 546:270–279. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(79)90045-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cohen Y, Jørgensen BB, Revsbech NP, Poplawski R. 1986. Adaptation to hydrogen sulfide of oxygenic and anoxygenic photosynthesis among cyanobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 51:398–407. doi: 10.1128/AEM.51.2.398-407.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Klatt JM, Haas S, Yilmaz P, de Beer D, Polerecky L. 2015. Hydrogen sulfide can inhibit and enhance oxygenic photosynthesis in a cyanobacterium from sulfidic springs. Environ Microbiol 17:3301–3313. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Canfield DE, Stewart FJ, Thamdrup B, De Brabandere L, Dalsgaard T, Delong EF, Revsbech NP, Ulloa O. 2010. A cryptic sulfur cycle in oxygen-minimum-zone waters off the Chilean coast. Science 330:1375–1378. doi: 10.1126/science.1196889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Xia Y, Lü C, Hou N, Xin Y, Liu J, Liu H, Xun L. 2017. Sulfide production and oxidation by heterotrophic bacteria under aerobic conditions. ISME J 11:2754–2766. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mehta-Kolte MG, Loutey D, Wang O, Youngblut MD, Hubbard CG, Wetmore KM, Conrad ME, Coates JD. 2017. Mechanism of H2S oxidation by the dissimilatory perchlorate-reducing microorganism Azospira suillum PS. mBio 8:e02023-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02023-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Luna-Sánchez M, Hidalgo-Gutiérrez A, Hildebrandt TM, Chaves-Serrano J, Barriocanal-Casado E, Santos-Fandila Á, Romero M, Sayed RK, Duarte J, Prokisch H, Schuelke M, Distelmaier F, Escames G, Acuña-Castroviejo D, López LC. 2017. CoQ deficiency causes disruption of mitochondrial sulfide oxidation, a new pathomechanism associated with this syndrome. EMBO Mol Med 9:78–95. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201606345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu H, Xin Y, Xun L. 2014. Distribution, diversity, and activities of sulfur dioxygenases in heterotrophic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:1799–1806. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03281-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Xin Y, Liu H, Cui F, Liu H, Xun L. 2016. Recombinant Escherichia coli with sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase and persulfide dioxygenase rapidly oxidises sulfide to sulfite and thiosulfate via a new pathway. Environ Microbiol 18:5123–5136. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cherney MM, Zhang Y, Solomonson M, Weiner JH, James MN. 2010. Crystal structure of sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase from Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans: insights into sulfidotrophic respiration and detoxification. J Mol Biol 398:292–305. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Grim SL, Dick GJ. 2016. Photosynthetic versatility in the genome of Geitlerinema sp. PCC 9228 (formerly Oscillatoria limnetica ‘Solar Lake’), a model anoxygenic photosynthetic cyanobacterium. Front Microbiol 7:1546. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Theissen U, Hoffmeister M, Grieshaber M, Martin W. 2003. Single eubacterial origin of eukaryotic sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase, a mitochondrial enzyme conserved from the early evolution of eukaryotes during anoxic and sulfidic times. Mol Biol Evol 20:1564–1574. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msg174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dahl C, Franz B, Hensen D, Kesselheim A, Zigann R. 2013. Sulfite oxidation in the purple sulfur bacterium Allochromatium vinosum: identification of SoeABC as a major player and relevance of SoxYZ in the process. Microbiology 159:2626–2638. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.071019-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Thorup C, Schramm A, Findlay AJ, Finster KW, Schreiber L. 2017. Disguised as a sulfate reducer: growth of the Deltaproteobacterium Desulfurivibrio alkaliphilus by sulfide oxidation with nitrate. mBio 8:e00671-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00671-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Klatt JM, de Beer D, Hausler S, Polerecky L. 2016. Cyanobacteria in sulfidic spring microbial mats can perform oxygenic and anoxygenic photosynthesis simultaneously during an entire diurnal period. Front Microbiol 7:1973. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Weissgerber T, Sylvester M, Kroninger L, Dahl C. 2014. A comparative quantitative proteomic study identifies new proteins relevant for sulfur oxidation in the purple sulfur bacterium Allochromatium vinosum. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:2279–2792. doi: 10.1128/AEM.04182-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Marcia M, Ermler U, Peng G, Michel H. 2010. A new structure-based classification of sulfide:quinone oxidoreductases. Proteins 78:1073–1083. doi: 10.1002/prot.22665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shen J, Peng H, Zhang Y, Trinidad JC, Giedroc DP. 2016. Staphylococcus aureus sqr encodes a type II sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase and impacts reactive sulfur speciation in cells. Biochemistry 55:6524–6534. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li K, Xin Y, Xuan G, Zhao R, Liu H, Xia Y, Xun L. 2019. Escherichia coli uses separate enzymes to produce H2S and reactive sulfane sulfur from L-cysteine. Front Microbiol 10:298. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Greiner R, Palinkas Z, Basell K, Becher D, Antelmann H, Nagy P, Dick TP. 2013. Polysulfides link H2S to protein thiol oxidation. Antioxid Redox Signal 19:1749–1765. doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.5041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Iciek M, Kowalczyk-Pachel D, Bilska-Wilkosz A, Kwiecien I, Gorny M, Wlodek L. 2015. S-sulfhydration as a cellular redox regulation. Biosci Rep 36:e00304. doi: 10.1042/BSR20150147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Paul BD, Snyder SH. 2015. Protein sulfhydration. Methods Enzymol 555:79–90. doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2014.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Huang S, Wilhelm SW, Harvey HR, Taylor K, Jiao N, Chen F. 2012. Novel lineages of Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus in the global oceans. ISME J 6:285–297. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shih PM. 2019. Early cyanobacteria and the innovation of microbial sunscreens. mBio 10:e01262-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01262-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cohen Y, Jørgensen BB, Padan E, Shilo M. 1975. Sulphide-dependent anoxygenic photosynthesis in the cyanobacterium Oscillatoria limnetica. Nature 257:489–492. doi: 10.1038/257489a0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Klatt JM, Al-Najjar MA, Yilmaz P, Lavik G, de Beer D, Polerecky L. 2015. Anoxygenic photosynthesis controls oxygenic photosynthesis in a cyanobacterium from a sulfidic spring. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:2025–2031. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03579-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhao Z, Gonsior M, Schmitt-Kopplin P, Zhan Y, Zhang R, Jiao N, Chen F. 2019. Microbial transformation of virus-induced dissolved organic matter from picocyanobacteria: coupling of bacterial diversity and DOM chemodiversity. ISME J 13:2551–2565. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0449-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chen F, Wang K, Huang S, Cai H, Zhao M, Jiao N, Wommack KE. 2009. Diverse and dynamic populations of cyanobacterial podoviruses in the Chesapeake Bay unveiled through DNA polymerase gene sequences. Environ Microbiol 11:2884–2892. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02033.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wang Y, Liu Y, Wang J, Luo T, Zhang R, Sun J, Zheng Q, Jiao N. 2019. Seasonal dynamics of bacterial communities in the surface seawater around subtropical Xiamen Island, China, as determined by 16S rRNA gene profiling. Mar Pollut Bull 142:135–144. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.03.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Li Y, Tang K, Zhang L, Zhao Z, Xie X, Chen CA, Wang D, Jiao N, Zhang Y. 2018. Coupled carbon, sulfur, and nitrogen cycles mediated by microorganisms in the water column of a shallow-water hydrothermal ecosystem. Front Microbiol 9:2718. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Koch T, Dahl C. 2018. A novel bacterial sulfur oxidation pathway provides a new link between the cycles of organic and inorganic sulfur compounds. ISME J 12:2479–2491. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0209-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Shah V, Zhao X, Lundeen RA, Ingalls AE, Nicastro D, Morris RM. 2019. Morphological plasticity in a sulfur-oxidizing marine bacterium from the SUP05 clade enhances dark carbon fixation. mBio 10:e00216-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00216-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bibli SI, Luck B, Zukunft S, Wittig J, Chen W, Xian M, Papapetropoulos A, Hu J, Fleming I. 2018. A selective and sensitive method for quantification of endogenous polysulfide production in biological samples. Redox Biol 18:295–304. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2018.07.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lloyd D. 2006. Hydrogen sulfide: clandestine microbial messenger? Trends Microbiol 14:456–462. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2006.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Li H, Li J, Lu C, Xia Y, Xin Y, Liu H, Xun L, Liu H. 2017. FisR activates sigma(54)-dependent transcription of sulfide-oxidizing genes in Cupriavidus pinatubonensis JMP134. Mol Microbiol 105:373–384. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Shimizu T, Shen J, Fang M, Zhang Y, Hori K, Trinidad JC, Bauer CE, Giedroc DP, Masuda S. 2017. Sulfide-responsive transcriptional repressor SqrR functions as a master regulator of sulfide-dependent photosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:2355–2360. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1614133114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Luebke JL, Shen J, Bruce KE, Kehl-Fie TE, Peng H, Skaar EP, Giedroc DP. 2014. The CsoR-like sulfurtransferase repressor (CstR) is a persulfide sensor in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 94:1343–1360. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hou N, Yan Z, Fan K, Li H, Zhao R, Xia Y, Xun L, Liu H. 2019. OxyR senses sulfane sulfur and activates the genes for its removal in Escherichia coli. Redox Biol 26:101293. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2019.101293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chen Z, Zhang X, Li H, Liu H, Xia Y, Xun L. 2018. The complete pathway for thiosulfate utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e01241-18. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01241-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Olson KR, Straub KD. 2016. The role of hydrogen sulfide in evolution and the evolution of hydrogen sulfide in metabolism and signaling. Physiology (Bethesda) 31:60–72. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00024.2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Olson KR. 2018. H2S and polysulfide metabolism: conventional and unconventional pathways. Biochem Pharmacol 149:77–90. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kimura H. 2015. Signaling molecules: hydrogen sulfide and polysulfide. Antioxid Redox Signal 22:362–376. doi: 10.1089/ars.2014.5869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Olson KR. 2019. Hydrogen sulfide, reactive sulfur species and coping with reactive oxygen species. Free Radic Biol Med 140:74–83. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zhang CC, Zhou CZ, Burnap RL, Peng L. 2018. Carbon/nitrogen metabolic balance: lessons from cyanobacteria. Trends Plant Sci 23:1116–1130. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Jiang YL, Wang XP, Sun H, Han SJ, Li WF, Cui N, Lin GM, Zhang JY, Cheng W, Cao DD, Zhang ZY, Zhang CC, Chen Y, Zhou CZ. 2018. Coordinating carbon and nitrogen metabolic signaling through the cyanobacterial global repressor NdhR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:403–408. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1716062115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Latifi A, Ruiz M, Zhang CC. 2009. Oxidative stress in cyanobacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33:258–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00134.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Stevens SE, Porter RD. 1980. Transformation in Agmenellum quadruplicatum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 77:6052–6056. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.10.6052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ruffing AM, Jensen TJ, Strickland LM. 2016. Genetic tools for advancement of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 as a cyanobacterial chassis. Microb Cell Fact 15:190. doi: 10.1186/s12934-016-0584-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Xia Y, Li K, Li J, Wang T, Gu L, Xun L. 2019. T5 exonuclease-dependent assembly offers a low-cost method for efficient cloning and site-directed mutagenesis. Nucleic Acids Res 47:e15. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Lü C, Xia Y, Liu D, Zhao R, Gao R, Liu H, Xun L. 2017. Cupriavidus necator H16 uses flavocytochrome c sulfide dehydrogenase to oxidize self-produced and added sulfide. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e01610-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01610-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Szekeres E, Sicora C, Dragoş N, Drugă B. 2014. Selection of proper reference genes for the cyanobacterium Synechococcus PCC 7002 using real-time quantitative PCR. FEMS Microbiol Lett 359:102–109. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-delta delta C(T)) method. Methods 25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.