Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2020 Feb 12;77(4):435–437. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.4702

Association of High Traditional Masculinity and Risk of Suicide Death

Secondary Analysis of the Add Health Study

Daniel Coleman 1,, William Feigelman 2, Zohn Rosen 3
PMCID: PMC7042936  PMID: 32049263

Abstract

This cohort study explores the association between high traditional masculinity and suicide death among US men using data from the Add Health study.


In the United States, men die by suicide at 3.5 times the rate of women.1 One driver of this gender disparity may be high traditional masculinity (HTM), a set of norms that includes competitiveness, emotional restriction, and aggression.2 Quantitative studies of HTM are interrelated with discourse on hegemonic masculinity.3 Using norm- and trait-based measures, HTM men were found to have higher suicidal ideation (SI),2,4 but to our knowledge, the association with suicide death has not been tested with a credible measure of HTM.

Add Health is a nationally representative study of adolescents into adulthood. Feigelman and colleagues5 found 9 Add Health variables associated with suicide (Figure, A and B) and weak nonsignificant effects for depression and gun access. This study hypothesizes that HTM is associated with suicide, depression, gun access, and the 9 variables previously noted. No prediction was made for HTM regarding SI or suicide attempts.

Figure. Forest Plots of Factors Associated With Suicide Death and High Traditional Masculinity (HTM).

Figure.

A and B, Feigelman et al5 risk factors for suicide death. C and D, Association of HTM with risk factors. All tests, P <.05. OR indicates odds ratio.

Methods

Add Health began with 20 745 adolescents in 1995 and in 2014 was matched with death records using the National Death Index. The details of the methods of Add Health can be found at http://www.cpc.unc.edu/addhealth. The Add Health study was reviewed and approved for human participant issues at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. Under that protocol, written informed consent was elicited from all participants. The secondary analysis of this data was approved by the institutional review board at Fordham University.

Death by suicide was defined by National Death Index procedures. Through the use of a method novel to suicide research, an established procedure was replicated for scoring gender-typed attitudes and behaviors in which a single latent probability variable of identifying as male was generated from 16 gender-discriminating variables (including not crying, physically fit, not moody, not emotional, liking yourself, fighting, and risk taking).6 Participants scoring 73% probability or higher of identifying as male (>1 SD above the mean) were coded as HTM. Details of additional variables can be found in Feigelman et al.5 Because of the small number of suicides, the analysis was limited to bivariate tests and effect sizes: χ2 and odds ratios (ORs) and t tests and Cohen d. Stata, version 14 (StataCorp), was used for all data analyses and the criterion P value was set at P < .05.

Results

Of the 22 suicide deaths, 21 were men (OR, 21.7; 95% CI; 2.9-161; χ2 = 18.8; P < .001). All subsequent analyses include men only. High–traditional masculinity men were 2.4 times more likely to die by suicide than non-HTM men (χ2 = 3.979; P < .046; Table) but were 1.45 times less likely to report SI (χ2 = 23.06; P < .001). There was no association between HTM and suicide attempts. High–traditional masculinity men were slightly more likely to report easy gun access (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.01-1.20; χ2 = 4.27; P < .04) and had modestly lower depression levels (Cohen d, 0.17; P < .001).

Table. χ2 and t Test of Factors Associated With High Traditional Masculinity Among Male Respondents.

Measures HTM, No. (%) Total, % OR (95% CI) χ2 (df) P Value
Yes No
Suicide death
Yes 10 (.3) 9 (.1) 0.19 2.4 (0.99-6.0) 3.979 (1) .046
No 3084 (99.7) 6747 (99.9) 99.8
Total, No. 3094 6756 9850
Suicidal thoughtsa
Yes 249 (8) 760 (11.1) 10.2 0.69 (0.60-0.81) 23.06 (1) <.001
No 2856 (92) 6048 (88.8) 89.8
Total, No. 3105 6808 9913
Suicide attempta
Yes 62 (2) 164 (2.4) 2.3 0.82 (0.61-1.1) 1.71 (1) .19
No 3076 (98) 6683 (97.6) 97.7
Total, No. 3138 6847 9985
Easy access to guns
Yes 1020 (32.5) 2085 (30.4) 31.1 1.1 (1.01-1.2) 4.27 (1) .04
No 2118 (67.5) 4764 (69.6) 68.9
Total, No. 3138 6894 9987
Depression Cohen d (95% CI) t (df)
Mean (SD) 9.59 (6.17) 10.73 (6.98) NA 0.17 (0.13-0.21) 7.81 (9936) <.001
Total sample size, No. 3121 6817 9938 NA NA NA

Abbreviations: HTM, high traditional masculinity; NA, not applicable; OR, odds ratio.

a

During the past year.

All 9 risks for suicide from Feigelman et al5 were positively associated with HTM (Figure, C and D), with small to small-medium effect sizes.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that HTM is associated with subsequent suicide among men. In addition to a direct association with suicide death, the association of HTM with all other risks suggests a web of indirect effects. In male suicide death, HTM may be an underlying influence increasing the probability of externalizing behavior risk factors, such as anger, violence, gun access, and school problems. The finding that almost all suicide decedents were men underlines the central role of gender in suicide death. The protective or null association of HTM with nonfatal suicidal behavior mirrors the gender differences in suicide death and nonfatal attempts but conflicts with previous studies of HTM. Relevant interpretive theories of these findings include the Canetto cultural scripts theory and the Baumeister escape suicide theory.2

The measure of HTM is based on a well-established method6 and the 16 gender-discriminating variables are consistent with US relevant masculinity theory and measures in content, but its convergent validity with measures used in previous suicide research is unknown. Other limitations include that the small number of suicides precluded multivariate analyses and Add Health has no coding of gender identity other than male or female. This study should catalyze research, prevention, and intervention attention to the role of masculinity in suicide.

References

  • 1.Hedegaard H, Curtin SC, Warner M. Suicide Mortality in the United States, 1999-2017. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Coleman D. Traditional masculinity as a risk factor for suicidal ideation: cross-sectional and prospective evidence from a study of young adults. Arch Suicide Res. 2015;19(3):366-384. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2014.957453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Messerschmidt JW. The salience of “hegemonic masculinity”. Men Masculinities. 2019;22(1):85-91. doi: 10.1177/1097184X18805555 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pirkis J, Spittal MJ, Keogh L, Mousaferiadis T, Currier D. Masculinity and suicidal thinking. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017;52(3):319-327. doi: 10.1007/s00127-016-1324-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Feigelman W, Joiner T, Rosen Z, Silva C. Investigating correlates of suicide among male youth: questioning the close affinity between suicide attempts and deaths. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2016;46(2):191-205. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cleveland HH, Udry JR, Chantala K. Environmental and genetic influences on sex-typed behaviors and attitudes of male and female adolescents. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2001;27(12):1587-1598. doi: 10.1177/01461672012712003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAMA Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES