Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics Research logoLink to Genetics Research
. 2019 Jun 13;101:e8. doi: 10.1017/S0016672319000065

In trans variant calling reveals enrichment for compound heterozygous variants in genes involved in neuronal development and growth.

Allison J Cox 1,2, Fillan Grady 3, Gabriel Velez 3,4, Vinit B Mahajan 4,5, Polly J Ferguson 1, Andrew Kitchen 6, Benjamin W Darbro 1, Alexander G Bassuk 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC7045018  PMID: 31190668

Abstract

Compound heterozygotes occur when different variants at the same locus on both maternal and paternal chromosomes produce a recessive trait. Here we present the tool VarCount for the quantification of variants at the individual level. We used VarCount to characterize compound heterozygous coding variants in patients with epileptic encephalopathy and in the 1000 Genomes Project participants. The Epi4k data contains variants identified by whole exome sequencing in patients with either Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) or infantile spasms (IS), as well as their parents. We queried the Epi4k dataset (264 trios) and the phased 1000 Genomes Project data (2504 participants) for recessive variants. To assess enrichment, transcript counts were compared between the Epi4k and 1000 Genomes Project participants using minor allele frequency (MAF) cutoffs of 0.5 and 1.0%, and including all ancestries or only probands of European ancestry. In the Epi4k participants, we found enrichment for rare, compound heterozygous variants in six genes, including three involved in neuronal growth and development – PRTG (p = 0.00086, 1% MAF, combined ancestries), TNC (p = 0.022, 1% MAF, combined ancestries) and MACF1 (p = 0.0245, 0.5% MAF, EU ancestry). Due to the total number of transcripts considered in these analyses, the enrichment detected was not significant after correction for multiple testing and higher powered or prospective studies are necessary to validate the candidacy of these genes. However, PRTG, TNC and MACF1 are potential novel recessive epilepsy genes and our results highlight that compound heterozygous variants should be considered in sporadic epilepsy.

Keywords: bioinformatics, compound heterozygous, epilepsy, genetics

1. Introduction

Using the premise that effective variants are in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with common polymorphisms and haplotypes, linkage and association studies have identified genes involved in the development of traits and pathologies. Upon their identification, the regions flanking associated markers are sequenced to find the linked, penetrant variant. However, rare variants are often not detectable using LD-based methods. This problem has been alleviated by recent advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS), and the detection of highly penetrant rare variants associated with disease has reduced the heritability gap for such diseases as autism, Crohn's disease and osteoporosis (Kosmicki et al., 2016; Bomba, et al. 2017). Despite these advances, for most traits and complex disorders the underlying genes and variants remain elusive.

Recessive disorders are caused by mutations in both copies of a gene. The mutations may be homozygous, that is, identical or compound heterozygous. Compound heterozygous (CH) variants are two different variants in a gene on opposite alleles of a chromosome and it is speculated that CH mutations account for many recessive diseases (Li et al., 2010; Sanjak et al., 2017). Lack of detection of CH variants may explain a significant portion of missing heritability for all phenotypes (Li et al., 2010; Zhong et al., 2016; Sanjak et al., 2017). Association studies using polymorphisms are LD-based and recent association studies using rare variants compare total variant burden between cases and controls to account for the contributions of multiple alleles at a locus to phenotype. Importantly, because LD-based studies require recessive variants to be on the same genetic background and total variant burden analyses are not allele specific, neither discerns between dominant and recessive models of inheritance.

Burden tests may account for compound heterozygosity if the variants are allocated to one of the two alleles for a gene, that is, phased. Relatively common variants may be phased assuming linkage to surrounding haplotypes; in families, rare variants are phased using parental genotypes. Once variants are phased, it may be determined if an individual's variants are on different chromosomes, and burden tests that aggregate using an indicator function (i.e. presence of qualifying variants) may assess enrichment for recessive variants.

Here we provide a publicly available tool, VarCount, that is user-friendly and effective for researchers seeking to quantify the presence or absence of a variant or variants in a gene at the individual level. VarCount is useful for the quantification of heterozygous, homozygous or CH variants per sample. We used VarCount to query the Epi4k (Epi4k Consortium et al., 2013) dataset for rare homozygous and CH variants and found enrichment for rare, CH variants in six genes, including three involved in neuronal development or growth (PRTG, TNC and MACF1). The variants in the 1000 Genomes Project database are now phased (1000 Genomes Project Consortium et al., 2010; 2012; 2015), and so genes may be queried for in trans combinations of variants. The Epi4k enrichment was identified in comparison to the 1000 Genomes Project participants combining all ancestries and considering only individuals of European ancestry.

2. Materials and methods

  1. Processing of Epi4k vcf files

The Epi4k data (Epi4k Consortium et al., 2013) were accessed by permission via the Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP Study Accession, phs000653.v2.p1). Individual vcf files were combined using the CombineVariants function in GATK (McKenna et al., 2010). The vcf files were then annotated with minor allele frequencies (MAFs) from EVS (Exome Variant Server, NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project [ESP], Seattle, WA [URL: http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/]), 1000 Genomes Project and ExAC (Lek et al., 2015), and with information regarding the effect of each variant using SNPSift/SNPEff (Cingolani et al., 2012). The databases used for annotation were dbNSFP2.9 (for MAF and CADD score) and GRCh37.75 for protein effect prediction. SNPSift was used to remove any variants not inducing a protein-changing event (not ‘HIGH’ or ‘MODERATE’ impact) based on SNPEff annotation – this includes missense, nonsense, splice-site and insertion/deletion variants. Variants with quality flags and multiallelic variants, that is, those with more than two known nucleotide values, were also removed. Variants remaining after filtering were cross-referenced with the 1000 Genomes Project variants from the same MAF threshold to ensure that any variants removed from one dataset were removed from the other. The annotated vcf was used as input for VarCount. Ancestry for each exome was determined using LASER (Wang et al., 2014) and this information was input to VarCount via the SampleInfo.txt file. Ancestry and phenotype information for each proband are described in Supplementary Table 1. In addition to the annotated vcf file, the parameters.txt and subjectinfo.txt (containing sex and ancestry information) were used as input. Within the parameters file, the following qualifications were selected: (1) counting at the transcript (rather than gene) level, (2) protein-changing effects, (3) MAF threshold of either 0.005 or 0.01, (4) all within-dataset and annotated (1000 Genomes Project, ExAC and EVS) MAFs, and (5) either CH or homozygous variants. Analyses were run separately for the two MAFs and using all Epi4k probands (264) and only those of European ancestry (207). Because the variants were not phased, VarCount was used to query the vcf file for individuals with two or more variants in each transcript. The output, a list of counts for each transcript was then used to query the parental vcf files for genotype information to determine which sets of variants composed in trans combinations of variants. Final counts were determined using parental genotype information. Custom python scripts were used to query for parental genotypes and to count true compound heterozygotes or homozygotes. De novo variants were excluded in the determination of true in trans variants.

  1. Processing of 1000 Genomes Project vcf files

Vcf files for the 2504 participants in the 1000 Genomes Project (1000 Genomes Project et al., 2015) were downloaded by chromosome from the 1000 Genomes Project ftpsite. To reduce input file size, the genomic regions for the hg19 mRNA transcripts were downloaded via UCSC's Table Browser and used to remove noncoding regions from the vcf files. Including all exons from UCSC allowed for a more conservative analysis, given that the Epi4k data were sequenced using various exome captures, which are not inclusive of all possible exons. The variants were annotated and filtered via the same steps as the Epi4k vcf file. Multi-allelic variants were also removed prior to analysis by VarCount. A diagram showing the steps involved in processing and analysing the variant files is shown in (Figure 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Open in a new tab

Flow diagram for the processing and analysis of variant lists. Vcf files are annotated and filtered using SNPSift/SNPEff. Final vcf along with parameter and sample information files are input to VarCount. The input files are processed to recode minor and major alleles when the MAF >0.5 and to count the number of individuals with variants qualifying based on information in the parameter file. The final output lists for every transcript or gene, the number of individuals with qualified variants in that locus (counts.text), which individuals have the variant(s) (countfile.txt), and which variants are harboured by each individual (output.txt).

Vcf files were queried for homozygous and CH variants using VarCount. Because the variants in the 1000 Genomes Project vcf files are phased, determining true compound heterozygotes is automatic using VarCount. In addition to the annotated vcf file, the parameters.txt and subjectinfo.txt (containing sex and ancestry information) were used as input. Within the parameters file, the same qualifications used in the Epi4k analysis were selected: analyses were run for each of the two MAFs (0.5 and 1.0%) and for all 1000 Genomes Project participants and using only those of European (EUR) ancestry. The final output from analyses was for each MAF cutoff and for each population, counts for every transcript in which at least one individual harboured recessive variants.

  1. Epi4k statistical analysis

Using R statistical software, a Fisher's exact test was used to detect transcripts with significant differences in the proportion of individuals with homozygous or CH variants between the Epi4k dataset and the 1000 Genomes Project dataset. Odds ratios and p-values were calculated using the number of individuals with and without qualifying variants. Analyses were performed using all ancestries, and for only individuals of European ancestry. Both Bonferroni and Benjamini-Hochberg adjustments were used to determine significance thresholds after correction for multiple testing. The number of tests was based on the number of transcripts with at least one individual in either the Epi4k or 1000 Genomes Project dataset with in trans coding variants with MAFs below the set threshold.

  1. Structural modelling of PRTG

The three-dimensional structure of Protogenin (PRTG) was modelled off the crystal structure of the human receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase sigma (PDB: 4PBX; 25.1% sequence identity) using MODELLER 9.14 (Webb and Sali, 2016). The resultant model superimposed with the template had an RSMD of 4.94 Å over 442 Cα atoms. Charges and hydrogen atoms were added to the wild-type and mutant FGR models using PDB2PQR (Dolinsky et al., 2004). Electrostatic potentials were calculated using APBS (Konecny et al., 2012) as described previously (Moshfegh et al., 2016; Cox et al., 2017; Toral et al., 2017). Protein and solvent dielectric constants were set to 2.0 and 78.0, respectively. All structural figures were generated by PyMOL (https://pymol.org/2/; Schrödinger, LLC).

3. Results

  1. Varcount: variant quantification at the individual level

Varcount is a free, open source tool useful for the quantification of heterozygous, homozygous or CH variants per sample. Input variants may be phased or unphased. All python scripts and supporting files may be downloaded from Github at https://github.com/GeneSleuth/VarCount. Supporting files include the ‘parameters.txt’ file where the user may select variant filters for variant effect, MAF and inheritance pattern (homozygous, CH, one variant or two variants), and sample filters based on information entered into the ‘SampleInfo file’. Input vcf files must be annotated with SNPSift/SNPEff using the dbNSFP and GRCh37/38 databases. A readme file with instructions is also provided. A flow diagram with the steps involved in processing of data is depicted in Figure 1.

  1. CH variants in Epi4k probands reveal novel epilepsy genes

We used VarCount to query the Epi4k dataset for rare homozygous and CH variants. The Epi4k data are whole exome data from 264 trios with a child affected by epileptic encephalopathy, either infantile spasms (IS) or Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) (Epi4k Consortium et al., 2013). Counts were performed using individuals of all ancestries or just those of European ancestry (207/264). Individuals from the 1000 Genomes Project were used as controls. The individual counts and p-values for the analyses are listed in (Supplementary Tables 2–5). Including only rare variants (MAFs below 0.5 and 1.0%) determined enrichment for CH variants in six genes. For combined ancestries, the six genes are in order of significance: OSBP2, PRTG, ABCC11, MACF1, STAB1 and TNC. PRTG and TNC were also highly ranked in the 1% MAF analysis, with one additional count for each transcript. Variants for all six genes are listed in Table 1. In our analysis of just individuals of European ancestry, MACF1 was the most significantly enriched gene using a 0.5% MAF. The p-values indicated in Table 1 are for individual tests; there were no p-values significant after correction for multiple testing.

Table 1.

Rare (<0.5 and 1.0% minor allele frequency) compound heterozygous variants in Epi4k participants.

Gene Transcript Sex Phena. Ancb. Chr:bp* dbSNP ID REF/ ALT Exac
ALL AFc 		ExAC
NFE AF		 Peptide change Epi4k # (1%) 1 kg # (1%) p-value Epi4k # (0.5%) 1 kg # (0.5%) p-value
EU (y/n)d: All (y/n) EU (y/n): All (y/n) EU:All EU (y/n): All (y/n) EU (y/n): All (s/n) EU:All
PRTG ENST000
00389286		 F IS EU 15:56032666 rs373423650 T/C 9.94E-05 1.65E-04 E104G 3/204: 3/261 0/503: 0/2504 0.0245: 0.00086 2/205: 2/262 0/503: 0/2504 0.0847: 0.0091
15:56032666 rs185716584 C/G 0.003022 0.004315 E104D
M LGS EU 15:56032665 rs372777171 C/A 8.28E-06 1.50E-05 E575*
15:55965698 rs185716584 C/G 0.003022 0.004315 E104D
M LGS EU 15:56032665 rs35718474 G/A 0.003033 0.006701 P13S
15:56035093 rs148011047 T/G 0.002611 0.003608 K977T
OSBP2 ENST000
00332585		 M IS EU 15:55916703 rs200118898 C/G 1.09E-04 1.98E-04 S143W 2/205: 2/262 0/503: 0/2504 0.0847: 0.0091 2/205: 2/262 0/503: 0/2504 0.292: 0.0091
22:31091324 rs201298398 G/A 3.20E-04 5.19E-04 R262Q
M LGS E Asia 22:31137288 rs576508023 G/C 8.42E-06 0 G115R
22:31091239 NA C/T 1.66E-05 0 R383W
ABCC11 ENST000
00394747		 F IS EU 22:31283452 rs529824818 C/T 8.24E-06 0 C543Y 2/205: 2/262 0/503: 2/2502 0.0847: 0.0478 2/205: 2/262 0/503: 1/2502 0.0847: 0.0255
16:48242388 rs199839251 C/T 8.29E-06 1.51E-05 E273K
M LGS EU 16:48250159 NA C/A NA NA R889M
16:48226471 NA C/A NA NA G636V
TNC ENST000
00345230		 M IS EU 16:48234362 rs200401362 C/T 8.24E-06 0 G861R 2/205: 3/261 0/503: 4/2500 0.0847: 0.022 1/206: 2/262 0/503: 2/2502 0.29: 0.0478
9:117840315 rs117058692 C/G 7.77E-04 0.001248 G171R
9:117849499 rs143586851 C/T 2.23E-04 3.90E-04 A39T
M IS C/S Asia 9:117853183 rs149986851 C/A 2.06E-04 3.75E-04 G203V
9:117849402 rs139280264 G/A 8.51E-04 0.001247 R1066C
M IS EU 9:117835900 rs371055558 C/T 2.54E-05 3.07E-05 G576S
9:117848284 rs144032672 C/T 0.001336 0.002026 G210S
MACF1 ENST000
00289893		 M IS EU 9:117849382 NA G/A 1.65E-05 3.00E-05 R4344Q 3/204: 3/261 1/502: 11/2493 0.0769: 0.142 3/204: 3/261 0/503: 6/2498 0.0245: 0.0478
1:39900231 rs141949859 G/T 6.34E-04 1.12E-03 V3535F
M IS EU 1:39853797 rs145271544 G/T NA NA A3264S
1:39852984 rs138819868 T/G 2.46E-03 3.85E-03 F5885L
M LGS EU 1:39951304 NA A/G 8.28E-06 0 I1066V
1:39800136 NA G/C 8.264 1.50E-05 W4967C
STAB1 ENST000
00321725		 M IS ME 1:39910474 rs145751447 G/A 9.17E-05 0 D1289N 0/207: 2/262 1/502: 6/2498 0.99: 0.173 0/207: 2/262 1/502: 2/2502 0.99: 0.0478
3:52549439 rs147953260 G/A 0.001512 0.002524 R1872H
F IS C/S Asia 3:52554531 rs189303343 A/G 4.05E-05 3.66E-05 I590V
3:52540204 NA C/T NA NA R2351W
Open in a new tab

aPhen = phenotype, bAnc = ancestry, cAF = allele frequency, dy/n corresponds to yes/no counts of individuals with qualifying variants.

*bp (base pair position) in hg19/Build37.

Ancestries: EU = European, E Asia = East Asia, C/S Asia = Central/South Asia, ME = Middle East. Phenotypes: IS = Infantile spasms, LGS = Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.

p-values in bold are the most significant for the specific analysis.

The variants for the three individuals with CH PRTG variants are depicted in Figure 2a. Because of the concentration of variants at position E104, we performed structural modelling to predict the pathogenicity of the PRTG variants. The p.Glu104Gly and p.Glu104Asp variants localize to the immunoglobulin (Ig)-like domain 1 (Figure 2a). Ig-like domains are responsible for mediating protein–protein and protein–peptide interactions. The p.Glu104Gly disrupts a negative charge in the Ig-like 1 domain. This loss of charge may disrupt interactions with putative PRTG-binding partners (Figure 2c).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Open in a new tab

PRTG compound heterozygous mutations in Epi4k probands. (a) Theoretical model of the human PRTG structure spanning the plasma membrane indicating mutation locations in each child. The three pairs of in trans mutations, indicated in red, were found using a <1% MAF threshold. (b) Schematic representation of PRTG functional domains. Multiple sequence alignment of the PRTG Ig-1 domain. The E104 residue is 100% conserved across seven species. (c) Top: Electrostatic potential surface of PRTG calculated in APBS. Bottom: Close-up of the PRTG electrostatic potential surface at the site of mutation. The p.Glu104Gly mutation leads to a loss of negative charge, which may disrupt interactions with putative PRTG binding partners. The p.Glu104Asp mutation does not lead to a change in charge or electrostatic potential.

The de novo variants identified by Epi4k Consortium and the Epilepsy Phenome/Genome Project (Epi4k Consortium et al., 2013) in the nine probands with either PRTG, TNC or MACF1 recessive variants are described in Table 2. For the three patients with CH PRTG variants, one patient harbours a de novo missense variant in HSF2, the second has a nonsense variant in CELSR1, and the third patient has two de novo variants – a missense in Fam102A and a 3´UTR variant in USP42. De novo mutations were only reported in one of the probands with in trans TNC variants – a missense variant in DIP2C and a splice donor change in IFT172. All three patients with CH variants in MACF1 were reported to have de novo mutations. The first patient has a 5´ and 3´UTR de novo variant in FAM19A2 and GLRA2, respectively, and the second patient also has a 3´UTR de novo change in the gene LRRC8D and a missense change in SNX30. One de novo variant was identified in the third proband in the gene FAM227A. Polyphen2 categories and CADD scores for each de novo variant as well as missense and loss-of-function constraint metric values for each gene (from ExAC) are also listed in Table 2. The z-score is a ratio of expected to identified missense variants in a particular gene, and pLI is a gene's probability of being loss-of-function intolerant. These constraint metrics are calculated using genomic data from controls without severe genetic diseases in the ExAC database (Lek et al., 2015).

Table 2.

De novo variants in Epi4k probands with compound heterozygous variants in PRTG, TNC or MACF1.

Gene Missense z-scorea pLIb CH variants Sex Phenotype gene w/ de novo Variant type Polyphen-2c CADDd Missense z-scorea pLIb
PRTG –0.92 0.02 E104G, E104D F IS HSF2 Missense P 24 1.77 0.93
PRTG E104D, E575X M LGS CELSR1 Stop-gained NA 35 4.42 1.00
PRTG P13S, K977T M LGS FAM102A Missense D 25.1 1.80 0.43
USP42 3´ UTR NA –0.69 1.00
TNC –0.14 0.00 G861R, G171R, A39T M IS DIP2C Missense B 23.6 5.82 1.00
IFT172 Splice donor NA 23.9 0.22 0.00
TNC G203V, R1066C M IS NA – – – – –
TNC G576S, G210S M IS NA – – – – –
MACF1 2.63 1.00 R4344Q, V3535F M IS FAM19A2 5´ UTR NA NA 1.11 0.55
GLRA2 3´ UTR NA NA 3.28 0.91
MACF1 A3264S, F5885L M IS LRRC8D 3´ UTR NA NA 2.70 0.87
SNX30 Missense B 17.9 0.90 0.97
WDFY2 Synonymous NA NA 1.15 0.00
MACF1 I1066V, W4967C M LGS FAM227A Missense P 9.4 NA NA
Open in a new tab

az-score is a measure of tolerance to missense variants, based on ratio of expected to identified; bpLI is the probability that a gene is intolerant to loss-of-function variants; cPolyphen2 – prediction of a missense variant's impact on protein structure and function: B = benign, P = possibly damaging, D = damaging (Adzhubei et al., 2010); dCADD = phred-scaled score of Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion, a measure of the deleteriousness of a SNP or INDEL (Kircher et al., 2014).

Phenotypes: IS = Infantile spasms, LGS = Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.

4. Discussion

Epileptic encephalopathies are a group of severe, early-onset seizure disorders with consistent EEG abnormalities that over time interfere with development and cause cognitive decline (Covanis, 2012). The Epi4k dataset contains exome sequences from 264 trios that include a proband with epileptic encephalopathy, either LGS or IS. LGS is characterized by frequent, mixed epileptic seizures that arise most frequently between the ages of 3 and 5 (Amrutkar & Riel-Romero, 2018). IS occurs during the first year of life and is cryptic in its presentation, with mild head bobbing and is often not detected until the seizures have caused significant neurological damage (Kossoff, 2010). IS often progress into LGS over time.

We developed a free and user-friendly tool, VarCount, to query vcf files for individuals harbouring variants that qualify according to user specification. To test its function, we used VarCount to quantify rare, CH variants in probands from the Epi4k trio dataset and found enrichment for variants in six genes including PRTG, TNC and MACF1. PRTG codes for protogenin, a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily that is involved in axis elongation and neuronal growth during early vertebrate development (Toyoda et al., 2005; Vesque et al., 2006). TNC and MACF1 are also directly involved in neuronal development and/or growth. TNC (Tenascin-C) is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein involved in axonal growth and guidance (Jakovcevski et al., 2013). Seizures up-regulate TNC in the hippocampus, and in a pilocarpine epilepsy model up-regulation was shown to be mediated by TGF-β signalling (Mercado-Gomez et al., 2014). MACF1 is a cytoskeletal crosslinking protein highly expressed in the brain and is crucial for neuron development and migration (Moffat et al., 2017). MACF1 variants are associated with the neurological pathologies Parkinson's disease, autism and schizophrenia (Moffat et al., 2017). Recently, highly penetrant de novo MACF1 mutations were identified in several patients with a newly characterized lissencephaly with a complex brain malformation (Dobyns et al., 2018). This new phenotype highlights MACF1 variants’ variable impact on disease pathogenesis. Given both the enrichment in Epi4k probands for CH variants in these genes as well as their known involvement in neuronal processes, we suggest that PRTG, TNC and MACF1 are candidate recessive epilepsy genes.

The primary publication reporting analysis of the Epi4k trio dataset was a description of de novo mutations in the probands (Epi4k Consorium et al., 2013). An analysis of CH variants was also reported, using a MAF cutoff of 0.15%, which is lower than the cutoff used in the work presented here. In this analysis, the parents were used as internal controls, and CH variants in 351 genes were identified, without genome-wide significance. The authors only listed five of the genes which are known to cause Mendelian disorders that include a seizure phenotype – ASPM, CNTNAP2, GPR98, PCNT and POMGNT1. In our analysis using the 1000 Genomes Project participants as controls, enrichment for CH variants was not detected in any of these genes. Using the number of individuals with in trans variants in a gene (transcript) as an indicator function required at least two probands to have qualifying variants in order to detect single-test significance, with complete absence of qualifying variants in controls. It is clear from the analyses using either internal controls or the 1000 Genomes Project as controls that a larger sample size is required to achieve genome-wide significance.

The de novo variants reported by the Epi4k Consortium and the Epilepsy Phenome/Genome Project (Epi4k Consortium et al., 2013) in the nine probands with CH variants in PRTG, TNC or MACF1 are described in Table 2. Of the 12 genes with de novo variants identified in the nine patients, three are implicated in neurological disease. CELSR1 is a planar cell polarity gene in which mutations are known to cause neural tube defects including spina bifida (Robinson et al., 2012). De novo deletions of DIP2C have been reported in two patients with cerebral palsy, one of whom also had ADHD, and the other had seizures in infancy (Zarrei et al., 2018). In another report, deletions including DIP2C and/or ZMYND11 were identified in several patients with developmental delay including three patients with seizures (DeScipio et al., 2012). GLRA2 is a glycine receptor involved in neurodevelopment in which variants are implicated in autism (Pilorge et al., 2016; Lin et al., 2017), including a patient with comorbid epilepsy (Zhang et al., 2017).

Of the de novo variants reported in these genes, the nonsense variant in CELSR1 identified in one of the probands with in trans PRTG variants is the most likely to be pathogenic. However, regarding their involvement in neural tube defects, variants in CELSR1 are thought to contribute to pathogenesis but not in a Mendelian fashion, as variants have been found to be inherited from unaffected parents or to be ineffective in functional assays (Robinson et al., 2012; Allache et al., 2012). The nonsense CELSR1 variant in the patient reported here may contribute to epilepsy in the presence of a genetic modifier. The de novo missense mutation in DIP2C is predicted to be deleterious (CADD = 23.6) and has a low rate of benign missense variation based on constraint metrics (z = 5.82). The de novo variant in GLRA2 is in the 3´UTR so it is difficult to predict its impact on gene function and subsequent pathogenicity.

The CH variants in PRTG, TNC and MACF1 are similarly variable in predicted pathogenicity, with CADD scores ranging from between less than one to 38. PRTG and TNC both have constraint metrics indicative of a high tolerance to both missense and loss-of-function variants, while MACF1 is moderately intolerant of missense variants (z = 2.63) and extremely intolerant of loss-of-function variants (pLI = 1.0). Interestingly, aside from the 3´UTR variant in GLRA2, none of the de novo variants in the Epi4k participants with MACF1 CH variants are in genes associated with neurological disease or predicted with confidence to have a negative impact on gene function. This, in addition to MACF1’s intolerance to missense or nonsense variants, is supportive of the pathogenicity of the biallelic variants in the gene.

In summary, we present a free tool VarCount for the quantification of qualifying variants as an indicator function per individual in the analysis of variant lists (vcf files). We used VarCount to assess enrichment of rare, coding, CH variants in a cohort of 264 epilepsy probands and found enrichment in three genes involved in neurodevelopmental processes – PRTG, TNC and MACF1. A missense change at the E104 residue of PRTG was identified three times in two different probands. Significance was not maintained after correction for multiple testing, and larger cohorts or candidate gene studies using a different sample set are necessary to validate this enrichment. In the context of the de novo mutations also present in these patients, experimentation is necessary in order to delineate if the CH or de novo variants, or both, are pathogenic in the development of epileptic encephalopathy. PRTG, TNC and MACF1 are candidate recessive epilepsy genes and our work highlights that inheritance of CH variants should not be excluded from gene discovery or diagnostic analyses of patients with epilepsy.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the following grants: T32GM008629 (AJC), T32GM082729-01 (AJC), T32GM007337 (FG and GV), R01AR059703 (PJF, VBM and AGB) and R01NS098590 (AGB, PJF).

Author ORCIDs

Allison J. Cox, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6803-4456

Declaration of interest

None.

Supplementary material

For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672319000065.

S0016672319000065sup001.doc (516.5KB, doc)

click here to view supplementary material

References

  1. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Abecasis GR, Altshuler D, Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Gibbs RA, Hurles ME and McVean GA (2010). A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature 467(7319), 1061–1073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Abecasis GR, Auton A, Brooks LD, DePristo MA, Durbin RM, Handsaker RE, Kang HM, Marth GT and McVean GA (2012). An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature 491(7422), 56–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Garrison EP, Kang HM, Korbel JO, Marchini JL, McCarthy S, McVean GA and Abecasis GR (2015). A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526(7571), 68–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, Kondrashov AS and Sunyaev SR (2010). A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nature Methods 7(4), 248–249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Allache R, De Marco P, Merello E, Capra V and Kibar Z (2012). Role of the planar cell polarity gene CELSR1 in neural tube defects and caudal agenesis. Birth Defects Research A. Clinical and Molecular Teratology 94(3), 176–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Amrutkar C and Riel-Romero RM (2018). Lennox Gastaut syndrome. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls.
  7. Bomba L, Walter K and Soranzo N (2017). The impact of rare and low-frequency genetic variants in common disease. Genome Biology 18(1), 77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang le L, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, Land SJ, Lu X and Ruden DM (2012). A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin) 6(2), 80–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Covanis A (2012). Epileptic encephalopathies (including severe epilepsy syndromes). Epilepsia 53 Suppl. 4, 114–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cox AJ, Darbro BW, Laxer RM, Velez G, Bing X, Finer AL, Erives A, Mahajan VB, Bassuk AG and Ferguson PJ (2017). Recessive coding and regulatory mutations in FBLIM1 underlie the pathogenesis of chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO). PLoS One 12(3), e0169687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dobyns WB, Aldinger KA, Ishak GE, Mirzaa GM, Timms AE, Grout ME, Dremmen MHG, Schot R, Vandervore L, van Slegtenhorst MA, Wilke M, Kasteleijn E, Lee AS, Barry BJ, Chao KR, Szczałuba K, Kobori J, Hanson-Kahn A, Bernstein JA, Carr L, D'Arco F, Miyana K, Okazaki T, Saito Y, Sasaki M, Das S, Wheeler MM, Bamshad MJ, Nickerson DA, University of Washington Center for Mendelian Genomics, Center for Mendelian Genomics at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Engle EC, Verheijen FW, Doherty D and Mancini GMS (2018). MACF1 mutations encoding highly conserved zinc-binding residues of the GAR domain cause defects in neuronal migration and axon guidance. American Journal of Human Genetics 103(6), 1009–102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. DeScipio C, Conlin L, Rosenfeld J, Tepperberg J, Pasion R, Patel A, McDonald MT, Aradhya S, Ho D, Goldstein J, McGuire M, Mulchandani S, Medne L, Rupps R, Serrano AH, Thorland EC, Tsai AC, Hilhorst-Hofstee Y, Ruivenkamp CA, Van Esch H, Addor MC, Martinet D, Mason TB, Clark D, Spinner NB and Krantz ID (2012). Subtelomeric deletion of chromosome 10p15.3: clinical findings and molecular cytogenetic characterization. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 158A(9), 2152–2161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dolinsky TJ, Nielsen JE, McCammon JA and Baker NA (2004). PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculations. Nucleic Acids Research 32(Web Server issue), W665–W667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  14. Epi4k Consortium, Epilepsy Phenome/Genome Project, Allen AS, Berkovic SF, Cossette P, Delanty N, Dlugos D, Eichler EE, Epstein MP, Glauser T, Goldstein DB, Han Y, Heinzen EL, Hitomi Y, Howell KB, Johnson MR, Kuzniecky R, Lowenstein DH, Lu YF, Madou MR, Marson AG, Mefford HC, Esmaeeli Nieh S, O'Brien TJ, Ottman R, Petrovski S, Poduri A, Ruzzo EK, Scheffer IE, Sherr EH, Yuskaitis CJ, Abou-Khalil B, Alldredge BK, Bautista JF, Berkovic SF, Boro A, Cascino GD, Consalvo D, Crumrine P, Devinsky O, Dlugos D, Epstein MP, Fiol M, Fountain NB, French J, Friedman D, Geller EB, Glauser T, Glynn S, Haut SR, Hayward J, Helmers SL, Joshi S, Kanner A, Kirsch HE, Knowlton RC, Kossoff EH, Kuperman R, Kuzniecky R, Lowenstein DH, McGuire SM, Motika PV, Novotny EJ, Ottman R, Paolicchi JM, Parent JM, Park K, Poduri A, Scheffer IE, Shellhaas RA, Sherr EH, Shih JJ, Singh R, Sirven J, Smith MC, Sullivan J, Lin Thio L, Venkat A, Vining EP, Von Allmen GK, Weisenberg JL, Widdess-Walsh P and Winawer MR (2013). De novo mutations in epileptic encephalopathies. Nature 501(7466), 217–221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jakovcevski I, Miljkovic D, Schachner M and Andjus PR (2013). Tenascins and inflammation in disorders of the nervous system. Amino Acids 44(4), 1115–1127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kircher M, Witten DM, Jain P, O'Roak BJ, Cooper GM and Shendure J (2014). A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants. Nature Genetics 46(3), 310–315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Konecny R, Baker NA and McCammon JA (2012). iAPBS: a programming interface to Adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann Solver (APBS). Computational Science and Discovery 5(1), pii: 015005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kosmicki JA, Churchhouse CL, Rivas MA and Neale BM (2016). Discovery of rare variants for complex phenotypes. Human Genetics 135(6), 625–634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kossoff EH (2010). Infantile spasms. Neurologist 16(2), 69–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lek M, Karczewski K, Minikel E, Samocha K, Banks E, Fennell T, O'Donnell-Luria A, Ware J, Hill A, Cummings B, Tukiainen T, Birnbaum D, Kosmicki J, Duncan L, Estrada K, Zhao F, Zou J, Pierce-Hoffman E, Cooper D, DePristo M, Do R, Flannick J, Fromer M, Gauthier L, Goldstein J, Gupta N, Howrigan D, Kiezun A, Kurki M, Moonshine AL, Natarajan P, Orozco L, Peloso G, Poplin R, Rivas M, Ruano-Rubio V, Ruderfer D, Shakir K, Stenson P, Stevens C, Thomas B, Tiao G, Tusie-Luna M, Weisburd B, Won H, Yu D, Altshuler D, Ardissino D, Boehnke M, Danesh J, Roberto E, Florez J, Gabriel S, Getz G, Hultman C, Kathiresan S, Laakso M, McCarroll S, McCarthy M, McGovern D, McPherson R, Neale B, Palotie A, Purcell S, Saleheen D, Scharf J, Sklar P, Patrick S, Tuomilehto J, Watkins H, Wilson J, Daly M and MacArthur D. (2016). Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature 536(7616), 285–291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Li Y, Vinckenbosch N, Tian G, Huerta-Sanchez E, Jiang T, Jiang H, Albrechtsen A, Andersen G, Cao H, Korneliussen T, Grarup N, Guo Y, Hellman I, Jin X, Li Q, Liu J, Liu X, Sparsø T, Tang M, Wu H, Wu R, Yu C, Zheng H, Astrup A, Bolund L, Holmkvist J, Jørgensen T, Kristiansen K, Schmitz O, Schwartz TW, Zhang X, Li R, Yang H, Wang J, Hansen T, Pedersen O, Nielsen R and Wang J (2010). Resequencing of 200 human exomes identifies an excess of low-frequency non-synonymous coding variants. Nature Genetics 42(11), 969–972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lin MS, Xiong WC, Li SJ, Gong Z, Cao X, Kuang XJ, Zhang Y, Gao TM, Mechawar N, Liu C and Zhu XH (2017). alpha2-glycine receptors modulate adult hippocampal neurogenesis and spatial memory. Develeopmental Neurobiology 77(12), 1430–1441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, Daly M and DePristo MA (2010). The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Research 20(9), 1297–1303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mercado-Gomez O, Mercado-Gómez O, Landgrave-Gómez J, Arriaga-Avila V, Nebreda-Corona A and Guevara-Guzmán R (2014). Role of TGF-beta signaling pathway on Tenascin C protein upregulation in a pilocarpine seizure model. Epilepsy Research 108(10), 1694–1704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Moffat JJ, Ka M, Jung EM, Smith AL and Kim WY (2017). The role of MACF1 in nervous system development and maintenance. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 69, 9–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Moshfegh Y, Velez G, Li Y, Bassuk AG, Mahajan VB and Tsang SH (2016). BESTROPHIN1 mutations cause defective chloride conductance in patient stem cell-derived RPE. Human Molecular Genetics 25(13), 2672–2680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pilorge M, Fassier C, Le Corronc H, Potey A, Bai J, De Gois S, Delaby E, Assouline B, Guinchat V, Devillard F, Delorme R, Nygren G, Råstam M, Meier JC, Otani S, Cheval H, James VM, Topf M, Dear TN, Gillberg C, Leboyer M, Giros B, Gautron S, Hazan J, Harvey RJ, Legendre P and Betancur C (2016). Genetic and functional analyses demonstrate a role for abnormal glycinergic signaling in autism. Molecular Psychiatry 21(7), 936–945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Robinson A, Escuin S, Doudney K, Vekemans M, Stevenson RE, Greene ND, Copp AJ and Stanier P (2012). Mutations in the planar cell polarity genes CELSR1 and SCRIB are associated with the severe neural tube defect craniorachischisis. Human Mutation 33(2), 440–447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sanjak JS, Long AD and Thornton KR (2017). A model of compound heterozygous, loss-of-function alleles is broadly consistent with observations from complex-disease GWAS datasets. PLoS Genetics 13(1), e1006573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Toral MA, Velez G, Boudreault K, Schaefer KA, Xu Y, Saffra N, Bassuk AG, Tsang SH and Mahajan VB (2017). Structural modeling of a novel SLC38A8 mutation that causes foveal hypoplasia. Molecular Genetics and Genomic Medicine 5(3), 202–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Toyoda R, Nakamura H and Watanabe Y (2005). Identification of protogenin, a novel immunoglobulin superfamily gene expressed during early chick embryogenesis. Gene Expression Patterns 5(6), 778–785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Vesque C, Anselme I, Couve E, Charnay P and Schneider-Maunoury S (2006). Cloning of vertebrate Protogenin (Prtg) and comparative expression analysis during axis elongation. Developmental Dynamics 235(10), 2836–2844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang C, Zhan X, Bragg-Gresham J, Kang HM, Stambolian D, Chew EY, Branham KE, Heckenlively J, Fulton R, Wilson RK, Mardis ER, Lin X, Swaroop A, Zollner S and Abecasis GR (2014). Ancestry estimation and control of population stratification for sequence-based association studies. Nature Genetics 46(4), 409–415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Webb B and Sali A (2016). Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. Current Protocols in Protein Science 86, 2.9.1–2.9.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zarrei M, Fehlings DL, Mawjee K, Switzer L, Thiruvahindrapuram B, Walker S, Merico D, Casallo G, Uddin M, MacDonald JR, Gazzellone MJ, Higginbotham EJ, Campbell C, deVeber G, Frid P, Gorter JW, Hunt C, Kawamura A, Kim M, McCormick A, Mesterman R, Samdup D, Marshall CR, Stavropoulos DJ, Wintle RF and Scherer SW (2018). De novo and rare inherited copy-number variations in the hemiplegic form of cerebral palsy. Genetics in Medicine 20(2), 172–180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang Y, Ho TNT, Harvey RJ, Lynch JW and Keramidas A (2017). Structure-function analysis of the GlyR alpha2 subunit autism mutation p.R323L reveals a gain-of-function. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience 10, 158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhong K, Karssen LC, Kayser M and Liu F (2016). CollapsABEL: an R library for detecting compound heterozygote alleles in genome-wide association studies. BMC Bioinformatics 17, 156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672319000065.

S0016672319000065sup001.doc (516.5KB, doc)

click here to view supplementary material

Articles from Genetics Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES