Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Feb 27;15(2):e0228007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228007

Epidemiology of Schistosoma mansoni infection and associated risk factors among school children attending primary schools nearby rivers in Jimma town, an urban setting, Southwest Ethiopia

Azalech Tefera 1, Tariku Belay 2, Mitiku Bajiro 2,*
Editor: David Joseph Diemert3
PMCID: PMC7046261  PMID: 32107485

Abstract

Background

Schistosomiasis is one of the most neglected tropical parasitic disease which is common in Ethiopia. It is disease of rural areas for decades but now days there are reports of schistosomiasis from urban settings. Therefore, this study aimed to determine epidemiology of Schistosoma mansoni (S. mansoni) infection and associated determinant factors among school children attending primary schools nearby rivers in Jimma town, an urban setting, southwest Ethiopia.

Methodology

A cross sectional study was conducted among 328 school children aged between 7–17 years in selected primary schools nearby rivers in Jimma town from March to April 2017. For the diagnosis of S. mansoni, a single stool sample was obtained from each child and processed using double Kato Katz thick smear for quantification of S. mansoni ova examined using light microscope. A questionnaire was used to collect socio demographic data and associated determinant factors for S. mansoni infection. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20.0. Variables with P-value < 0.05 were significantly associated with S. mansoni infection.

Results

The overall prevalence of S. mansoni infection was found to be 28.7%. Majority of infection intensities were categorized as light with maximum egg per gram of stool (epg) was 1728. The geometric mean of infection intensity was 102.3epg. Schools distance from river (p = 0.001), swimming habit in rivers (p = 0.001) and crossing river on bare foot (p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for S. mansoni infection.

Conclusions

The study revealed S. mansoni infection is prevalent in Jimma town. The school children were at moderate risk of morbidity caused by S. mansoni (prevalence ≥ 10% and < 50% according to WHO threshold), hence a biannual mass drug administration with praziquantel is required once every two years in the study area and promote health information on prevention, control, transmission and risk factors for S. mansoni infection.

Introduction

Schistosomiasis caused by S. mansoni, is among the most prevalent but neglected tropical parasitic diseases. It is an intravascular parasite caused by blood fluke trematode belongs to genus Schistosoma. S. mansoni, Schistosoma japonicum and Schistosoma haematobium are responsible for most cause infection in human and Schistosoma mekeongi and Schistosoma intercalatum are less prevalent species [1].

Schistosomes are transmitted through contact with fresh water contaminated with human excreta containing schistosomes eggs which hatch in fresh water and releasing free swimming miracidia; which infect aquatic snail Biomphalaria pfeifferi, an intermediate host for S. mansoni to complete its life cycle and release cercariae in to water and human can be infected during contacts with water for various domestic purposes[1].

The clinical manifestation of schistosomiasis occurs in three stages, which involves swimmers’ itch, acute, and chronic schistosomiasis. Swimmers’ itch is a local inflammatory reaction, visible at the site of cercarial penetration, composed of edema, dilated capillaries and a few cells, attributed to the local release of monokines in which the severity of the reaction is depending on the duration of schistosomulae stay in the dermis.

Acute schistosomiasis is due to systemic hypersensitivity reaction against the migrating larva through different system which is characterized by sudden fever, fatigue, myalgia, malaise, non-productive cough and eosinophilia, then after the immature worm complete its migration and positioned themselves to the final position they resides then followed by abdominal symptoms in most cases infected individuals recover spontaneously within few weeks but some infected individuals developed to persistent and become more serious disease with weight loss, dyspnoea, diarrhea, diffuse abdominal pain, toxaemia, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly and widespread rash.

Chronic schistosomiasis is due the eggs trapped in the tissues during the perivesical or per intestinal migration in the liver, spleen, lungs, or cerebrospinal system.

The eggs secrete proteolytic enzymes that provoke typical eosinophilic inflammatory and granulomatous reactions, which are progressively replaced by fibrotic deposits[2].The severity of the symptoms is thus related both to the intensity of infection and to individual immune responses.

Clinical signs and symptoms of schistosomiasis in children is generalized, non-specific signs and symptoms, that makes it difficult to identify disease-specific morbidity signs, thus why morbidity may progress from subtle manifestations such as anemia, to more severe, devastating and irreversible conditions such as growth stunting, impaired cognitive development, increased susceptibility to co-infection, decreased quality of life, exercise intolerance, infertility, portal hypertension, and liver failure[3].

Diagnosis of schistosomiasis is conducted based on parasitological examination of stool using Kato Katz thick smear technique which is widely used and also recommended by WHO for surveillance and monitoring program[4].

Schistosomiasis is endemic in 77 countries of tropical and sub-tropical regions of the world. It is estimated that the number of infected individuals worldwide were 237 million with >97% of infected individual live in Africa, and 120 million people already diseased; of which 20 million were severely diseased. About an estimated 779 million people are at risk of infection with 85% of the population are living in Africa. The estimated annual mortality rate is to be 150,000–280,000 and 1.7–4.5 million in disability adjusted life years lost [59].

Inadequate clean water supply, poor environmental sanitation and limited access to education are factors which makes intestinal helminthes infection remains a significant health problem in developing countries[10]. The high prevalence of S. mansoni infection in developing countries is directly associated with infested water bodies (pond, stream, river, and dam) by cercariae and contact with it during crossing with bare foot, swimming, washing of clothes and utensil, playing, fishing and irrigation activity[11].

Water temperature, absence or presence of snail intermediate host, population movement and development of water dams for irrigation and hydroelectric power are determinant factors for distribution and transmission Schistosoma species (S. mansoni and S. haematobium) in Ethiopia [12].

S. mansoni is the most prevalent species in Ethiopia and its prevalence has been reported in different regions of the country with rapid distribution in connection with water resource development and intensive population movements, with nearly 90% reported among school children [13].

Various epidemiological studies reported S. mansoni infection among school children in different countries with disparity in prevalence with Brazil 14.4% [14], Northwestern Tanzania, 64.3% and 84.01%[15, 16], Roryal District, Northwestern Tanzania 15.1% [17], high altitude crater lakes in Western Uganda 27.8%[18], Kismu city western Kenya 21.0% [19], Nigeria, 4.6% and 12.6% [20, 21], Ghana 19.8% [22].

Various epidemological studies in different localities of Ethiopa also reported S. mansoni infection with vary in prevalence. School children in Dembia district 11.2% [23], north Gonder 33.7% [24],Adarkay District 54.3% [25],Dembia plains 35.8% [26], Sanja Town 89.9% [27], Bahir Dar town 7.3% [28], Hayk Town 45% [29] from Northwest part of Ethiopia are reported to be infected with S. mansoni.

There were also reports from Southern part of Ethiopia with variation in prevalence from Wolayita, 58.6% and 81.3% [30, 31], Bushullo village, 73.7% [32], Lake Hawassa, 31%[33],Wendo Genet, 74.9% [34], Southeast of lake Langano. 21.2% [35], different water source users in Tigray, 5.95% [36], Waja-Timuga, District of Alamata, 73.9%[37], Suburbs of Mekelle city, Tigray, 23.9% [38], Northern part Ethiopia and Horru Guduru Wollega 67.6% [39] Western parts of Ethiopia and surrounding district of Gelgel Gibe Dam Jimma zone 2.1% [40], 24.0%; 27.6% from Jimma zone Manna district[41, 42] and 8.4% from Jimma town [43] Southwest Ethiopia.

There is evidence that S. mansoni infection is prevalent in Jimma Town from case reports in health facilities, presence of intermediate host in river crossing the town and water bodies near to some of the schools in which the students have contact with it at different time during schooling; however, there seems to be no document that report prevalence S. mansoni in Jimma town.

School children in selected primary schools in Jimma town are groups of population are more at risk of infections with S. mansoni since the students have frequent contacts with the river crossing the town and water bodies nearby the schools. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine epidemiology of S. mansoni infection and associated determinant factors among School Children attending Primary Schools nearby Rivers in Jimma Town, an urban setting, Southwest Ethiopia.

Materials and methods

Study area and study population

The study was conducted between March and April, 2017 among school children from five purposely selected primary schools namely Kito, Hamile 19, Jimma primary, Seto Yido and Tesfa Tewahido that are located nearby rivers in Jimma town, Oromia regional state, Southwest Ethiopia. Jimma Town is located at altitude 1780 meters above sea level and longitude of 7° 40’N, 36° 50’E, 352 Km, to the Southwest of Addis Ababa. It is characterized by a warm climate with an average annual rainfall of 800–2,500 mm. Temperature in Jimma is within a comfortable range, with the daily mean temperature between 20°C and 25°C year-round and it has a tropical rainforest climate. It has features of a long annual wet season from March to October. Based on the 2007 Central Statistics Agency census report, the projected total population of the town was 134,040. Based on Jimma town health office record, there are two governmental hospitals, four health centers, and seventeen urban health extensions are found in the town. According to information obtained from Jimma town educational office, there are 40 primary schools in the town, 22 governmental and 18 non-governmental primary schools. There are rivers in Jimma town which are considered as potentially risk factors for S. mansoni infection as the students have frequent contact with it for domestic purpose. Among these Awetu River which crosses the town dividing the town in to two half junction at different sites in which the community as well the students have contact with the river and Jimma primary school is close to it. Seto and Kaba rivers are near to Seto yido and Tesfa Tewahido primary schools. Kito River is near to Hamile 19 and Kito primary schools. School children aged from 7 to 17 attending school in selected primary schools nearby rivers in Jimma town were involved in the study.

Study design and sample processing

School based cross-sectional study was employed among five primary school children nearby rivers in Jimma town. The schools were purposely selected based on their proximity to rivers and water bodies. The school children were supplied with dry and clean-labeled plastic container cup and tissue paper and advised to bring proper stool samples with the container. All the specimens were checked for their label and quantity. For the benefit of the students’ wet mount microscopic examination was done at schools to examine motile trophozoite stage of protozoan parasitic infection. Then the stool samples were transported and processed for microscopic examination in the laboratory of Medical Parasitology, School of Medical Laboratory Sciences in Jimma University, for screening of ova of S. mansoni.

Kato-Katz parasitological technique was applied according to the WHO recommendation for the quantification of S. mansoni eggs in stool samples. A double Kato Katz slides were prepared from single stool sample collected from each child. The Kato -Katz preparations were examined after 24 hours for quantification of ova of S. mansoni and other soil transmitted helminthes except hookworm; which was examined within 30 minutes to an hour.

Clinical examination

Experienced Nurses and Public health officers assessed the presence or absence of signs and symptoms of S. mansoni infection like, abdominal pain, fever, palpable splenomegaly and hepatomegaly, and fatigue.

Sample size and sampling technique

Sample size was determined using single population proportions using P = 26.3% from the research done on communities living in Jimma town near by three rivers in the town [44] by using the below formula:

n=(zα2)2p(1p)d2,

Where, n is the sample size, Z is statistics for level of confidence, P is expected prevalence or proportion, and d is measures the Precision of the estimate and the calculated sample size was 298 and considering 10% non-response rate the final sample size was 328.

Systematic random sampling technique was used to select school children who participated in the study based on proportional allocation of students from the five primary schools using class roaster/attendance that contains complete list of students from the schools before commencing data collection.

Following allocations, students in each class were ordered alphabetically and the first primary student was selected in random starting point and the next students were included in a fixed periodic interval. When the selected student was absent, the student after the indicated one was sampled for replacement. In each school, we stratified students according to three age groups (7–10 years, 11–14 years and 15–17 years). Below is the figure indicating how the students were proportionally allocated and selected from the five primary schools nearby rivers in Jimma town (Fig 1).

Fig 1. How students were proportionally allocated and selected from the five primary schools nearby rivers in Jimma town, Southwest, Ethiopia, 2017.

Fig 1

Data processing and statistical analysis

Data were coded, entered and cleaned by using EPIIFO version 4.0.2.101. The processing and analysis of the data were carried out using SPSS version 20.0 software. The prevalence of S. mansoni was presented in percent and infection intensity of S. mansoni was categorized as low, moderate and heavy based on WHO guide line and mean egg count was reported by geometric mean respectively. The association between S. mansoni infection and associated risk factors were statistically tested using binary logistic regression and the level of significance was set at P-value <0.05). The magnitude of association was measured using adjusted odds ratio (AOR), at 95% CI.

Data quality control

Refreshment training was given for data collectors and laboratory technologist/technician about Kato-Katz thick smears by experienced laboratory technologist in the field. During data processing, the quality of data was assured by coding and double entry. From both positive and negative Kato-Katz smears 10% were randomly selected and re-read by two independent medical laboratory experts who are blind to the primary result. Moreover, fresh working solution of malachite-green was used routinely to maintain the quality of the smear.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by Ethical review committee of Jimma University Institute of Health research and postgraduate study with Ref No. IHRPGC/309/2017. The purpose of the study was communicated with Jimma Town Health Officers and then with schools principals. Informed consent was obtained from the parents/guardians of the students. Students infected with S. mansoni were treated with 40 mg/kg Praziquantel and those infected with soil transmitted helminthes and parasitic protozoan were treated with 400 mg albendazole and Metronidazole 250mg/dose orally according to National treatment guide line of Federal Ministry of Health of Ethiopia by trained and experienced Nurses and Health Officer.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants

A total of 328 school children, of which 59.8% (196) males and 40.2% (132) females from five primary schools nearby rivers in Jimma town were involved in this study. Students from the age group of 7–17 years with mean age of 11.63 were involved in the study. The largest proportion 214(65.2%) of study participants were selected from the age group of 11-14(Table 1).

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of school children in selected primary schools nearby rivers in Jimma town, an urban setting, Southwest Ethiopia, 2017.

Characteristics
Gender n(%)
        Male 196(59.8)
        Female 132(40.2)
Age groups (years)
        7–10 91(27.7)
        11–14 214(65.2)
        15–17 23(7.1)
Schools
    Seto Yiddo 95(29.0)
    Jimma primary school 67(20.4)
    Hamile 19 70(21.3)
    Kitto 58(17.7)
    Tesfa Tewahido 38(11.6)

Prevalence of S. mansoni

Stool samples were collected from 328 school children and examined for presence of S. mansoni and other intestinal parasites. From 328 school children involved in this study 218(66.5%) children were found to be infected with at least one parasite species. In addition to S. mansoni, T. trichiura 66(20.12%), A. lumbricoides 16(4.9%), H. nana 10(3.04%), hookworm 1(0.3%), Teania species 1(0.3%), G. lambelia 15(4.6) and E. histolytica/dispar10(10.04%) were also detected in the stool samples examined.

The overall prevalence of S. mansoni in the selected primary schools nearby rivers in Jimma twon was found to 28.7% (94/328). The prevalence was 39.3% (77/196) and 12.9% (17/132) between male and female school children respectively. School children age groups between 15-17(39.1%) was more infected. The prevalence vary from 12.1% to 38.9% among the schools with the highest prevalence 38.9%(37/95) in Seto Yiddo school (Table 2).

Table 2. Prevalence of S. mansoni among selected primary school children nearby rivers in Jimma town, an urban setting, Southwest Ethiopia 2017.

Variables S. mansoni infection status Total (%)
Number of positive (%) Number of negative (%)
Gender
        Male 77(39.3) 119(60.7) 196(59.8)
        Female 17(12.9) 115(87.1) 132(40.2)
Age (years)
        7–10 21(23.1) 70(76.9) 91(27.7)
        11–14 64(29.9) 150(70.1) 214(65.2)
        15–17 9(39.1) 14(60.9) 23(7.1)
Schools
    Seto Yiddo 37(38.9) 58(61.1) 95(29.0)
    Jimma primary school 16 (23.9) 51 (76.1) 67(20.4)
    Hamile 19 26(37.1) 44 (62.9) 70(21.3)
    Kitto 7(12.1) 51(87.9) 58(17.7)
    Tesfa Tewahido 8(21.1) 30 (78.9) 38(11.6)

Infection intensity of S. mansoni

Among 328 school children examined for presence of S. mansoni infection 94 school children excreted ova S. mansoni and the ova was quantified based on WHO guideline by counting epg stool. From these school children excreting ova of S. mansoni 50(53.2%), 33(35.1%), 11(11.7%) of them were categorized as light, moderate and heavy infection intensity. The majority of infection intensity was categorized as light infection intensity with maximum of 1728 epg. The geometric mean of egg count was 102.3 epg (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Infection intensity of S. mansoni among purposively selected primary school children in Jimma town, Southwest Ethiopia, 2017.

Fig 2

Clinical manifestation of S. mansoni

School children participated in this study undergone physical examination and diagnosed for sign and symptoms related with schistosomaisis. The most frequent clinical investigation from school children was abdominal pain 162 (49.4%) (Fig 3).

Fig 3. S. mansoni positive with clinical manifestation among primary school children attending school nearby rivers in Jimma town, an urban, Southwest Ethiopia, 2017.

Fig 3

61.0% (200/328) had one or more clinical sign and symptoms of S. mansoni infection. The remaining 128(39.0%) had no clinical manifestations. 24.5% (49/200) of the school children with clinical presentation were positive for S. mansoni and 75.5% (151/200) them found to be negative for S. mansoni infection respectively (Fig 4).

Fig 4. Prevalence of S. mansoni infection with clinical findings among school children attending primary schools nearby rivers in Jimma town, an urban setting, Southwest Ethiopia, 2017.

Fig 4

Of 39.0% (128/328) of school children with no clinical manifestations 35.2% (45/128) were positive for S. mansoni infection and 64.8% (83/128) were found to be negative for S. mansoni infection (Fig 5).

Fig 5. Prevalence of S. mansoni infection with negative clinical findings among school children attending primary school nearby rivers in Jimma town, an urban setting, Southwest Ethiopia, 2017.

Fig 5

Factors associated with S. mansoni infection

Bivariate factor analysis was carried out for association of S. mansoni infection and factors among school children such as age in year, gender, distance of school from river, swimming habit, swimming frequency, river contact while crossing, washing clothes in the river, habit of bathing in the river and variables with P-value less than 0.025 were used as cut off point for considering as candidates for multiple logistic regression to identify independent risk factor for S. mansoni infection(Table 3).

Table 3. Bivariate analysis of factors associated with S. mansoni infection among school children attending primary schools nearby rivers in Jimma town, an urban setting, Southwest Ethiopia, 2017.

Risk factors No. of infected No. of not infected Bivariate
95% CI for COR
Total Odds ratio 95% CI P-value
Age in year 7–10 21 70 91 1:00
11–14 64 150 214 1.422 0.805–2.512 0.225
15–17 9 14 23 2.143 0.813–5.647 0.123
Gender Male 77 119 196 4.377 2.440–7.852 0.001
Female 17 115 132 1:00
Distance of School from river School 1 37 58 95 4.648 1.906–11.331 .001
2 8 30 38 1.943 0.640–5.896 0.241
3 26 44 70 4.305 1.704–10.878 0.002
4 16 51 67 2.286 0.867–6.025 .095
5 7 51 58 1.00
Swimming habit Yes 80 124 204 5.069 2.718–9.453 0.001
No 14 110 124 1.00
Swimming frequency Daily 7 26 33 0.365 0.762–5.664 0.26
Weekly 73 98 171 1.00
Crossing river on bare foot Yes 66 85 151 4.132 2.466–6.923 0.001
No 28 149 177 1.00
Washing clothes in the river Yes 40 83 123 1.348 0.827–2.197 0.232
No 54 151 205 1.00
Habit of bath in the river Yes 27 55 82 1.312 0.765–2.249 0.324
No 67 179 246 1.00
Total 94 234 328

Among variables used as candidates for multiple logistic regression gender (AOR: 3.31, 95%CI, 1.69–6.46, P = 0.001), crossing rivers on bare foot(AOR: 3.17, 95%CI, 1.73–5.80, P = 0.001), swimming or playing nearby river(AOR = 4.68, 95%CI, 2.37–9.23, P = 0.01), distance of school from river, were significantly associated and independent predictors for S. mansoni infection (p<0.05) (Table 4).

Table 4. Multivariate factor analysis associated with S. mansoni infection among school children attending primary school nearby rivers in Jimma town, an urban setting, Southwest Ethiopia, 2017.

Variables No. of infected No. of not infected Total Multivariate
AOR 95%CI P-value
Gender Male 77 119 196 3.312(1.691–6.486) 0.001
Female 17 115 132 1:00
Distance of school from river School 1 37 48 95 5.111(1.985–13.163) 0.001
2 8 30 38 5.389(1.564–18.563) 0.008
3 26 44 70 7.254(2.668–19.721) 0.001
4 16 51 67 3.433(1.233–9.559) 0.02
5 7 51 58 1.00
Swimming habit Yes 80 124 204 4.679(2.372–9.231) 0.001
No 14 110 124 1.00
Crossing rivers on bare foot Yes 66 85 151 3.166(1.729–5.800) 0.001
No 28 149 177 1.00

Discussion

In the present study, the prevalence of S. mansoni infection among five selected primary school children’s nearby rivers in Jimma town was 28.7% with the prevalence between male and female was 39.3% and 12.95% respectively. Majority of infection intensity were classified as light with maximum of 1728 epg. Gender, distance of school from river, river water contact while crossing, swimming or playing nearby river were independent predictors for S. mansoni infection.

The prevalence in the present study was almost comparable with the study from Jimma town 26.3% [44], 25.3% [45], 24% & 27.6% from Manna district Jimma zone[41, 42], 27.6% from Saja town Amhara region[46] 33.7% in Gonder[24],31% from lake Hawassa[33], 23.9% from suburbs of Mekelle city, Tigray[38], 27.8%from high altitude crater lakes in Western Uganda[18].

The prevalence rate in the present study was higher than the one reported from Jimma zone, nearby Gilgel Gibe dam, 10.61% and 2.1%[40, 47],8.4% Jimma town [43], 21.2% from Southeast of lake Langano[35], 7.3% from Bahir Dar town [28], 20.6% from Gorgora town Northwest Ethiopia [48], 20.2% in Raya, Alamata[49], 5.95% in Tigray from different water sources [36], 0.8% in Amibera[50]. Similarly from different part of Latin America and Africa with lower prevalence were recorded from Brazil 14.4% [14], Nigeria, 4.6% and 12.6%, Ghana 19.8% [22], 18.9% in Sierra Leone [51], and 1.1%, 12.5% in two endemic area of Niger River basin[52], 1.5% from Bamako, Mali[53],15.1% of S. mansoni from Roryal District, Northwestern Tanzania[17],21.0% of S. mansoni from Kismu city western Kenya [19], 12.1% from Agaie, Niger State, Nigeria[20], 20.3% Birnin-Gwari local government area Kaduna state, Nigeria [54].The difference might be due to the study period, the laboratory diagnosis employed, sample size used, environmental factors which favor distribution of intermediate host, proximity water bodies and longtime endemicity in the area.

On the other hand, the prevalence of S. mansoni infection in the present study lower than reports Sengerema District, North Western Tanzania 64.3% and 84.01% from Northwestern Tanzania [15, 16], 69% from Nyanza province Kenya [3]. Similarly from different parts of Ethiopia 45% from Hayk [29],58.6% and 81.3% from Wolita [30, 31],73.7% from Bushullo village [32]74.9% from Wondo Genet[34],65.5%, 55% in Wondo Genet [55], 89.9% from Saja town Northwest Ethiopia [27], 67.6% from Wollega[39].This variation might be probably because of water source development in those areas, water contact behavior of children, differences in climatic conditions of the area, distance of schools from water sources, Study periods and duration of endemicity in that area.

Majority of infection intensity in the study area was categorized as low infection intensity which is similar with study reported from Wollo, Hayke [29], Wondo Genet [55], Gorgora town Northwest Ethiopia[48], suburbs of Mekelle city, Northern Ethiopia [38],Tumuga and Waja, North Ethiopia [56], Jimma town [44], Manna district Jimma Zone [41], Nyanza Province Kenya [3], School- age children in rural communities from Northern Ghana [22], North western Tanzania [15] and different in which the infection intensity was moderate infection intensity from Kamissie, Wollo [55], Wollega [39], Wondo Genet [34], Saja area, Amhara region [46], Sierra Leon [57] and Yemen [58]. This variation might be due to difference in exposure to water bodies, methods used diagnosis and may be skill of professionals involved in the examination.

Male students were more infected than female students in this study [AOR = 3.312,1.691–6.486, 95%CI, P = 0.001], which is in line with study reported from Jimma town [43, 44], Wollo, Hayk area [29], Amibera district Northern Ethiopia [50] and North Ghana [22], Jos, Nigeria [21].This difference might be due to repeated water-contact activity by male children than female when they were playing in the field and also may be due to the fact that females are mostly restricted to home with household responsibilities with their families.

Gender, distance of schools from river, crossing river/water on bare foot, swimming habits in river/ponds were independent predictors for S. mansoni infection which is in line with the variables crossing rivers on bare foot reported from the studies, Manna district Jimma Zone [42], Gorgora town Northwest Ethiopia [48], Saja town, Northwest Ethiopia [27], Israel [59], Swimming habits similar with study from Saja town [27], Raya Alamata District Northern Ethiopia [49], Amiebera Distrct northern Ethiopia [50], Saja area, Amahara region [46], and distance of schools from rivers similar with findings from Nigeria [54] and in Yemen [58].

Conclusion

The school children in five selected primary schools in Jimma town were at moderate risk of the morbidity caused by S. mansoni, hence a biannual mass drug administration with praziquantel is requiredonce every two years in this area and promote health information on prevention, control, transmission and risk factors for S. mansoni infectionin the area and improving environmental sanitation and personal hygiene via construction of latrines in schools. Constructing local bridges on Awetu and Seto rivers which have role in reducing chance of contacts with infested water bodies while crossing the rivers may minimize the risk of acquiring S. mansoni infection.

Supporting information

S1 Questionnaire. Survey questionnaire used for assessing participants behaviors in English and local language.

(DOCX)

S1 File. Ethical approval letter to from Jimma university institute of health research and post graduate office to conduct the research.

(DOCX)

S2 File. Written consent form to participate in the study English version.

(DOCX)

S3 File. Written consent form to participate in the study in local language Afan oromo version.

(DOCX)

S1 Data. Laboratory procedure for Kato Katz.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for School teachers, study participants, and their parents. Additionally, we would like to thank the staffs of NTDs Laboratory in Jimma University for providing Kato-Katz kits and reagents.

Lists of abbreviations

AOR

Adjusted Odd Ratio

CI

Confidence Interval

COR

Crude Odd ratio

EPG

Egg per Gram

SPSS

Statistical Package for Social Science

WHO

World Health Organization

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files

Funding Statement

The study is funded by organization Jimma University institute of health research and postgraduate. So there is no specific funder with this research. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.WHO: Schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiases: number of people treated in 2015. WHO. 2016, 91(49/50): 585–600 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rashad SB, Gamal ET, Tamer El-B:Human Schistosomiasis: Clinical Perspective: Review. Journal of Advanced Research 2013, 4:433–444. 10.1016/j.jare.2013.01.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Aaron MS, Elizabeth M, Mwinzi PNM, Wiegand RE, Muchiri G, Ireri E, et al. Schistosoma mansoni Morbidity among School-Aged Children: A SCORE Project in Kenya.American Journal Tropical Medicine Hygiene 2012, 87(5):874–882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.WHO:Report of the WHO Informal Consultation on Schistosomiasis Control. Geneva: WHO report; 1998:1–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chitsulo L, Engels D, Montresor A, Savioli L: The global status of schistosomiasis and its control. Acta Trop 2000, 77:41–51. 10.1016/s0001-706x(00)00122-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Engles D, Chitsulo L, Montresor A, Savioli L: The global epidemiological situation of schistosomiasis and new approaches to control and research. Acta Trop 2002, 82(2):139–146. 10.1016/s0001-706x(02)00045-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Steinmann P, Keiser J, Bos R, Tanner M, Utzinger J: Schistosomiasis and water resources development: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimates of people at risk. Lancet Infect Dis 2006, 6:411–425. 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70521-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.WHO: The global burden of disease. 2004.
  • 9.WHO: Schistosomiasis: population requiring preventive chemotherapy and number of people treated in 2010.Weekly Epidemiological Record 2012, 4(87):37–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Abera K, Ahmed A: An overview of environmental health status in Ethiopia with particular emphasis to its organisation, drinking water and sanitation: a literature survey. Ethiop J Health Dev 2005, 19(2):89–103. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kabatereine N.B, Brooker S, Tukahebwa E.M, FKazibwe F, Onapa A.W: Epidemiology and geography of Schistosomo mansoni inUganda: implications for planning control,. Tropical Medicine and International Health 2004, 9(3):372–380. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01176.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ali A, Erko B, Micheal W.T, Kloos H: “Schistosomiasis,” in Epidemiology and Ecology of Health and Disease in Ethiopia, Berhane Y., Mariam H. D., and Kloos H., Eds., Shama Book, Ethiopia,. 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kloos H, Lo CH, Birrie H: Schistosomiasis in Ethiopia. Soc Sci Med 1998, 26(8):803–827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Barbosa C.S, Favre T.C, Wanderley T.N, Callou A.C, Pieri O.S: Assessment of schistosomiasis, through school surveys, in the Forest Zone of Pernambuco, Brazil. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 2006, 101(1):55–62. 10.1590/s0074-02762006000100010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mazigo DH, Waihenya R, Mkoji M.G, Zinga M, Ambrose E.E, Jahanpour F.O, et al. Intestinal schistosomiasis: prevalence, knowledge, attitude and practices among school children in an endemic area of north western Tanzania. Journal of Rural and Tropical Public Health 2010, 9:53–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Siza JE, Kaatano GM, Chai JY, Eom KS, Rim HJ, Yong TS, et al. Prevalence of Schistosomes and Soil-Transmitted Helminths among School children in Lake Victoria Basin, Tanzania. Korean J Parasitol 2015, 53(5):515–524. 10.3347/kjp.2015.53.5.515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Munisi DZ, Buza J, Mpolya EA, Kinung'hi SM: Intestinal Schistosomiasis among Primary School children in Two On-Shore Communities in Rorya District, Northwestern Tanzania: Prevalence, Intensity of Infection and Associated Risk Factors. Journal of Parasitology Research 2016:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.John R EM, Philbert C, Andrew A: Schistosomiasis transmission at high altitude crater lakes in Western Uganda. BMC Infectious Diseases 2008, 8:110 10.1186/1471-2334-8-110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Odiere MR, Opisa S, Odhiambo G, Jura WG, Ayisi JM, Karanja DM, et al. Geographical distribution of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminths among school children in informal settlements in Kisumu City, Western Kenya. Symposia of the British Society for Parasitology 2011, 138(12):15691577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Banji B, Babadoko M, Mohommed G: Survey of Schistosomiasis and other intestinal helminthiases among school-aged children in Agaie, Niger state, Nigeria.Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Science 2012, 15(7):1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Goselle NO, Anegbe D, Imandeh G.N, Dakul D.A, Onwuliri A.C.F, Abba O.J, et al. Schistosoma mansoni infections amongst school children in Jos, Nigeria. Science Science World Journal 2010, 5(1):1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Anto F, Asoala V, Adjuik M, Anyorigiya T, Oduro A, Akazili J, et al. Water Contact Activities and Prevalence of Schistosomiasis Infection among School-age Children in Communities along an Irrigation Scheme in Rural Northern Ghana.Bacteriology & Parasitology 2013, 4(4):2–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Alemu A, Tegegne Y, Damte D, Melku M: Schistosoma mansoni and soil-transmitted helminths among preschool-aged children in Chuahit, Dembia district, Northwest Ethiopia: prevalence, intensity of infection and associated risk factors. BMC Public Health 2016, 16:422 10.1186/s12889-016-2864-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mathewos B, Alemu A, Woldeyohannes D, Alemu A, Addis Z, Tiruneh M, et al. Current status of soil transmitted helminthes and Schistosoma mansoni infection among children in to primary school in northern Gonder, Northwest Ethipia. BMC Research Notes 2014, 7(88):1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jemaneh L: Intestinal helminth infections in school children in Adarkay District, Northwest Ethiopia, with special reference to Schistosomiasis mansoni. Ethiop J Health Dev 1997, 11(3):289–294. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jemaneh L: Schistosomiasis mansoni and geo-helminthiasis in school children in the Dembia plains, Northwest Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev 1998, 12(3):237–244. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Worku L, Damte D, Endris M, Tesfa H, Aemero M: Schistosoma mansoni Infection and Associated Determinant Factors among School Children in Sanja Town, Northwest Ethiopia. Journal of Parasitology Research 2014:1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Abera B, Alem G, Yimer M, Herrador Z: Epidemiology of soil-transmitted helminths, Schistosoma mansoni, and haematocrit values among school children in Ethiopia. J Infect Dev Ctries 2013, 7(3):253–260. 10.3855/jidc.2539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Amsalu G, Mekonnen Z, Erko B: A new focus of schistosomiasis mansoni in Hayk town, northeastern Ethiopia. BMC Research Notes 2015, 8:22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Alemayehu B, Tomass Z: Schistosoma mansoni infection prevalence and associated risk factors among school children in Demba Girara, Damot Woide District of Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine 2015, 8(6):457–463. 10.1016/j.apjtm.2015.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Alemayehu B, Tomass Z, Wadilo F, Leja D, Liang S, Erko B: Epidemiology of intestinal helminthiasis among school children with emphasis on Schistosoma mansoni infection in Wolaita zone, Southern Ethiopia. BMC Public Health 2017, 17:587 10.1186/s12889-017-4499-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Terefe A, Shimelis T, Mengistu M, Hailu A, Erko B: Schistosomiasis mansoni and soil-transmitted helminthiasis in Bushulo village, southern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal Health Development 2011, 25(1):46–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tadege B, Shemilis T: Infections with Schistosoma mansoni and geohelmnthes among school children dwelling along the shore of the lake Hawassa, Southern Ethiopia. PloS One 2017, 12(7):e0181547 10.1371/journal.pone.0181547 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Erko B, Degarege A, Tadesse K, Mathiwos A, Legesse M: Efficacy and side effects of praziquantel in the treatment of Schistosomiasis mansoni in school children in Shesha Kekele Elementary School, Wondo Genet, Southern Ethiopia. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine 2012:235–239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Legesse M, Erko B: Prevalence of intestinal parasites among school children in a rural area close to the southeast of Lake Langano, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal Health Developement 2004, 18(2):116–120. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Dejenie T, Asmelash T: Schistosomiasis Mansoni among School Children of Different Water Source Users in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. MEJS 2010, 2(1):49–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Abebe N, Erko B, Medhin G, Nega B: Clinico-epidemiological study of Schistosomiasis mansoniin Waja-Timuga, District of Alamata, northern Ethiopia. Parasites & Vectors 2014, 158(7):1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Assefa A, Dejenie T, Tomass Z: Infection prevalence of Schistosoma mansoni and associated risk factors among school children in suburbs of Mekelle city, Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. MEJS 2013, 5(1):174–188. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Haile S, Golassa L, Mekonnen Z: Prevalence of Schistosoma mansoni and effectiveness of Praziquantel in school children in Finchaa valley, Ethiopia. Journal of Parasitology and Vector Biology 2012, 4:25–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yami A, Mamo Y, Kebed S: Prevalence and predictors of intestinal helminthiasis among school children in Jimma Zone. Ethiop J Health Sci 2011, 21(3):167–174. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bajiro M, Dana D, Ayana M, Emana D, Mekonnen Z, Zawdie B, et al. Prevalence of Schistosoma mansoni infection and the therapeutic efficacy of praziquantel among school children in Manna District, Jimma Zone, southwest Ethiopia. Parasites and Vectors 2016. 9(560). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bajiro M, Tesfaye S: Schistosoma mansoni infection prevalence and associated determinant factors among school children in Mana District, Jimma Zone, Oromia Region, South west Ethiopia. J bacteriol &parasitol 2017, 8(5):329. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bajiro M, Dana D, Leveck B: Prevalence and intensity of Schistosoma mansoni infections among school children attending primary Schools in an urban setting in Southwest, Ethiopia. BMC Research Notes 2017, 10:677 10.1186/s13104-017-3023-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mengistu M, Torben W, Shimelis T, Torben W, Terefe A, Kassa T, et al. Human intestinal Schistosomiasis in communities living near rivers of Jimma town, south western Ethiopia. Ethiopian journal of health science 2011, 21(2):111–118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kure A, Mekonnen Z, Dana D, Bajiro M, Ayana M, Vercruysse J, et al. Comparison of individual and pooled stool samples for the assessment of intensity of Schistosoma mansoni and soil-transmitted helminth infections using the Kato-Katz technique.Parasites and vectors 2015, 8(489). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Alebie G, Erko B, Aemero M, Petros B: Epidemological study on Schistosoma mansoni infection in Saja area, Amahara region, Ethiopia. Parasites & Vectors 2014, 7(15):1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Abebe G, Kiros M, Golasa L, Zeynudin A: Schistosoma mansoni infection among patients visiting a health centre nearby Gilgel Gibe dam.EastAfrican Journal of Public Health 2010, 1(7):80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Essa T, Birhane Y, Endris M, Moges A, Moges F: Current status of Schistosoma mansoni infections and associated risk factors among student in Gorgora town, Northwest Ethiopia. ISRN Infectious Diseases 2013:1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dejenie T, Legese K, Tomas Z, Kiros S: Index of Potential Contamination for Intestinal Schistosomiasis among School Children of Raya Alamata District, Northern Ethiopia. Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science 2013. 5(2):32–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Awoke W, Bedimo M, Tarekegn M: Prevalence of schistosomiasis and associated factors among students attending at elementary schools in Amibera District, Ethiopia.Open Journal of Preventive Medicine 2013, 3(2):199–204. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Joseph BK, Jen P, Aiah AG: Geographical Distribution of Intestinal Schistosomiasis and Soil-Transmitted Helminthiasis and Preventive Chemotherapy Strategies in Sierra Leone.Plos Negelected Tropical Diseases 2010, 4(11):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sackoa M, Magnussenb P, Keita AD:Impact of Schistosoma haematobium infection on urinary tract pathology, nutritional status and anaemia in school-aged children in two different endemic areas of the Niger River Basin, Mali. Acta Tropica 2011, 120:142–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Dabo A, Diarra ZA, Machault V, Touré O, Niambélé SD, Kanté A, et al. Urban schistosomiasis and associated determinant factors among school children in Bamako, Mali, West Africa. Infectious Diseases of Poverty 2015, 4(4). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Alhassan A, Luka SA, Balarabe ML, Kogi E: Prevalence and selected risk factors of intestinal schistosomiasis among primary school Children in Birnin-Gwari Local Government Area, Kaduna State, Nigeria.International Journal of Applied Biological Research 2013, 5(1):72–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Aemero M, Berhe N, Erko B: Status of Schistosoma mansoni prevalence and intensity of infection in geographically apart endemic localities of Ethiopia: A comparison. Ethiop J Health Sci 2014, 24(2):189–194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Dejene T, Asmelash T, Abdelkadir M: Efficacy of Praziquantel in treating Schistosoma mansoni infected school children in Tumuga and Waja, North Ethiopia. MEJS 2010, 2(2):3–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Elizabeth T, Bangura N, Nyalley F: Prevalence and intensity of Soil-transmitted helminthes (STHs) and Schistosomes in primary school in bio district, Southern Sierra Leone. Global journal of bio science and biotechnology 2016, 5(1):55–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Sady H, Al-Mekhlafi HM, Mahdy M A.K, Lim Y A.L, Mahmud R, Surin J: Prevalence and Associated Factors of Schistosomiasis among Children in Yemen: Implications for an Effective Control Programme. PLOS Neglected Tropical Disease 2013, 7(8):e2377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Leshem E, Maor Y, Meltzer E, Assous M, Schwart E: Acute Schistosomiasis Outbreak: Clinical Features and Economic Impact. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2008, 47:1499–1506 10.1086/593191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Salah A Sheweita

Transfer Alert

This paper was transferred from another journal. As a result, its full editorial history (including decision letters, peer reviews and author responses) may not be present.

29 Aug 2019

PONE-D-19-19521

Epidemiology of Schistosoma mansoni infection and associated determinant factors among School Children attending Primary Schools nearby Rivers in Jimma Town, an urban setting, Southwest Ethiopia

PLOS ONE

Dear Weltagi

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by  October 15, 2019 When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Salah A Sheweita

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have reported significance probabilities of 0 in places. Since p=0 is not strictly possible, please correct this to a more appropriate limit, eg 'p<0.0001'.

3. Please include copies of the survey questions or questionnaires used in the study to assess participant behaviours (eg. swimming, river contact, washing), in both the original language and English, as Supporting Information, or include a citation if they have been published previously.

4. We noticed you have some minor occurrence(s) of overlapping text with the following previous publication(s), which needs to be addressed:

https://www.longdom.org/open-access/schistosoma-mansoni-infection-prevalence-and-associated-determinantfactors-among-school-children-in-mana-district-jimma-zone-oromi-2155-9597-1000329.pdf

https://dx.doi.org/10.4269%2Fajtmh.2012.12-0397

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69440-3

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/792536

https://path.upmc.edu/cases/case622/dx.html

In your revision ensure you cite all your sources (including your own works), and quote or rephrase any duplicated text outside the Methods section. Further consideration is dependent on these concerns being addressed.

5.  We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.  

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

  • The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

  • A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

  • A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This manuscript reports the epidemiological characteristics of schistosomiasis among schoolchildren nearby rivers in Jimma Town, Southwest Ethiopia. The study is too simple and the number of targeting people is 328 schoolchildren (relatively small). Several concerns are as follows:

1. The survey was done only one time targeting 328 schoolchildre using a single stool sample from each child; questionnaire study was also done. However, the results show no unique/novel findings compared with previous ones done in the similar areas (references no. 40, 41, 42, 43).

2. The descriptions are not so well done. For example, in introduction part, the textbook level information on schistosomiasis is described unnecessarily as long paragraphs.

3. Reference citations are too many; the number can be reduced into less than a half.

4. English should be improved. A native speaker should consult on English of this manuscript.

Reviewer #2: In this study, Tefera and colleagues investigated the prevalence of S. mansoni infection and the associated risk factors among schoolchildren in Jimma Town, Ethiopia. This manuscript is a contribution to the literature, but there are some issues, that if address, would improve it:

Points:

1) Authors mentioned that only a single stool sample was collected from each child. This may lead to inaccurate results as according to CDC guideline three samples should be collected on different days to increase the sensitivity of stool diagnosis. Negative findings reported in this survey may not reflect the true prevalence of the disease.

2) Authors also reported that several other helminth and protozoa eggs were detected in the stool, however, these data were not included in the manuscript. This data should be included to show the co-infection status among these schoolchildren, which is equally important.

3) Discussion – Authors should discuss in more detail on their findings rather than just comparing the prevalence in %.

4) There are some grammatical errors which require English editing.

e.g. schistosomes – not italic

sex – change to gender

hepatomegaly, splenomegaly

Reviewer #3: The study reports Schistosoma mansoni infection among school children and associated risk factors in an urban setting of Ethiopia. The manuscript adds useful information on distribution of schistosomiasis in Ethiopia where new foci of schistosomiasis transmission is being reported. However, the manuscript has some major issues in particular the second aspect aiming to address “associated determinants factors”.

Frist, I would suggest not using ‘determinant’ in the title as the study was not really designed to address/identify ‘determinants’ of S. mansoni infection, more appropriately, ‘likely risk factors’, or ‘risk factors’ at best.

Second, since the analysis (addressing risk factors) was performed at the whole town scale and study subjects recruited from a small subset )five primary schools) of schools the in the town. It would be helpful/important to know if the ‘five school’ are presentative of the schools in the town in the context of schistosome infection. Therefore more information on the five schools (e.g. geographical location and environment factors of their corresponding surroundings) are important to readers. Would it be possible to add a map showing the distribution of all schools and study school, rivers etc.? That would be very helpful.

I am concerned about the clinical manifestation aspect of survey. As many surveyed variables (e.g. headache etc.) are not schisto specific and the results didn’t seem to produce any meaning information. It doesn’t seem to me this aspect adds any value to the paper.

Many descriptions seem to be redundant and close attention should be paid to the language, e.g. increasing clarity and avoid redundancy)

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Feb 27;15(2):e0228007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228007.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


28 Oct 2019

Academic editor and reviewers comments

Academic editor Response

� Significance of probabilities P<0.000 � The comment is accepted and corrected to P<0.0001 in the Table 3 between line 304 and 305

� Survey questions or questionnaires used in the study to assess participant behaviors (eg. swimming, river contact, washing) � The comment is accepted and survey questionnaire both in local language and English version attached as supporting information

� overlapping some text in previous publications � With regard to overlapping of some text in one of the publication I am the author and the study area is different from the current even the objective is different meaning the current one is to assess the distribution of S. mansoni among school children near to water bodies in an urban setting where as the previous one was done in the rural areas. The risk factors where ever it is the same. With others publications mentioned I used the figures from the articles for review and they were done somewhere else. Overall the current research focus on school children near to water bodies in the town and the assess the effect of water on S. mansoni we have published one articles before in the town which reported prevalence of S. mansoni in which the risk factors weren’t assessed and second there is variation among the schools in prevalence and now we have focused on school children near to water bodies to see the effect of water bodies and association with S. mansoni

Reviewer #1 Response

� Epidemiological study issue � Yes we have done epidemiological study in the town and we have reported prevalence data and associated risk factors for S. mansoni infection. With regard to the survey it isn’t simple now days mass drug administration was implemented in different areas of the country and our study was done in urban settings and in this areas in most cases mass drug administration wasn’t implemented at the time of data collection and it gives hint for Jimma town health office to implement mass drug administration

� Sample size issue � With regard to sample size we can’t say the sample size is too small as we determined sample size based sample size calculation formula. The other issue we can’t screen all school children because of resource and time and human power also. Thus why we have used some previously published article and used P value 26.3% from the research done in communities living in Jimma town near by three rivers in the town. So we have followed recommended procedure for determining sample size for doing research.

� Results compared with previous study done in the area �Reference 40 the research was done in the rural area of the zone on intestinal helminthiasis surrounding districts hydro electric dam in which the prevalence was not compared with the current study which was 2.1% vs 28.7%. Even the school children considered as low risk versus moderate risk.

�With regards to no unique findings with references mentioned � Reference 41 the study objective is different from the current one and there was repeated infection from registration book in the health facility and we suspect drug resistance and we did drug efficacy meanwhile we determine prevalence but the study area was rural vs urban in which the setting different.

� The same is true for reference 42 except we have assessed the risk factors in the same area with 41 with slight difference with prevalence.

� Reference 43 the study was in the same area in the town and only prevalence data was reported and the risk factors weren’t assessed. In the previous study we have tried to include all the school children in the town and we have reported there great variation in prevalence of S. mansoni among the schools and those schools near to water bodies were more infected and thus why we took this five school and we have tried to report both risk factors and prevalence and the prevalence was different 8.4% in previous and 28.7% in the current. Even had it been more samples were screened the prevalence was may be more than this

� With regards to single stool samples � Yes we have collected single stool sample from school children but we have prepared double kato katz from single stool samples based on WHO guideline recommendation for screening of intestinal parasitosis. We have used double Kato katz to decrease the chance of missing the ova and increasing the rate of prevalence as per recommendation of WHO guideline.

� Long paragraph from line 85-97 in the introduction part � The comment is accepted and I have tried to shorten the lines.

� Reference too many � There is no restriction of reference and others in the guideline and all the references I have used are relevant with our manuscript for discussion and even for literature review.

� English should be improved � The comment is accepted and I have tried to improved it

Reviewer #2 Response

� Tefera and his colleagues investigation on S. mansoni infection and its associated factors among school children in Jimma town � The comment is accepted but I couldn’t find the article thus why I didn’t include either in review literature or discussion.

� CDC guideline three samples examined for three different days � Examination of stool for three days on every other day is recommended for diagnostic purpose not for screening of large sample size. We have used WHO guideline published on 2014 which recommended taking single stool sample and examine using single thick Kato Katz for Schistosoma mansoni and soil transmitted helminthiasis and we have used double Kato Katz to increase sensitivity. It is most difficult to take three samples from each student at day interval of three days due to resources and time too. Therefore the comment raised by reviewer is used for diagnostic purpose not for research case.

� About other helminthes and protozoa detected in the stool � The comment is accepted and the data with specific Species of parasites were included in the manuscript line 242 to 247

� About discussion � In the first paragraph of discussion I have tried to discuss our findings, then I have discussed with other findings done before either in the country or abroad that is what we have to do under discussion and up to my understanding the discussion is well discussed with similar research done on school children.

� About schistosomes italics � The comment accepted and it is italicized and corrected

� Sex � The comment accepted and corrected then changed to gender

� Hepatomegally and splenomegally � The comment accepted and corrected as hepatomegaly and splenomegaly line 187 and 188

Reviewer#3 Response

� About associated determinants factors � The comment is accepted and changed to risk factors

� School representativeness � Yes these schools were selected based on proximity to water bodies with near the schools and river crossing the town and schools were purposely selected but the students were by systematic random sampling technique which has no bias on students selection with proportional allocation was made to each school. Thus the result derived from the schools can be representative

� The school environment is close to the water bodies in which the students have contact with these water bodies during their vacation and playing in the field in the compound and the snail serving as intermediate host is available in water bodies and identified as they are infected. Thus in the surrounding environment there are risk factors for infection for S. mansoni. In the previous study we have reported prevalence S. mansoni in the town but we didn’t assessed the risk factors and now we included assessing risk factors focusing on schools closed to water bodies.

� Clinical manifestation specific with headache � The comment accepted and the headache deleted between line 186 and 188

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewer comments.docx

Decision Letter 1

David Joseph Diemert

7 Jan 2020

Epidemiology of Schistosoma mansoni infection and associated risk factors among School Children attending Primary Schools nearby Rivers in Jimma Town, an urban setting, Southwest Ethiopia

PONE-D-19-19521R1

Dear Dr. Weltagi,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

David Joseph Diemert, M.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Authors disputed against the reviewers' comments that the number of cases examined is too small. It can be accepted. The reviewer has no other special comments.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Acceptance letter

David Joseph Diemert

17 Jan 2020

PONE-D-19-19521R1

Epidemiology of Schistosoma mansoni infection and associated risk factors among School Children attending Primary Schools nearby Rivers in Jimma Town, an urban setting, Southwest Ethiopia

Dear Dr. Bajiro:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. David Joseph Diemert

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Questionnaire. Survey questionnaire used for assessing participants behaviors in English and local language.

    (DOCX)

    S1 File. Ethical approval letter to from Jimma university institute of health research and post graduate office to conduct the research.

    (DOCX)

    S2 File. Written consent form to participate in the study English version.

    (DOCX)

    S3 File. Written consent form to participate in the study in local language Afan oromo version.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Data. Laboratory procedure for Kato Katz.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewer comments.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES