Abstract
X-ray free electron lasers (XFELs) provide ultrashort intense X-ray pulses suitable to probe electron dynamics, but can also induce a multitude of nonlinear excitation processes. These affect spectroscopic measurements and interpretation, particularly for upcoming brighter XFELs. Here we elaborate on the limits to observing classical spectroscopy, where only one photon is absorbed per atom for a Mn2+ in a light element (O, C, H) environment. X-ray emission spectroscopy (XES) with different incident photon energies, pulse intensities, and pulse durations is presented. A rate equation model based on sequential ionization and relaxation events is used to calculate populations of multiply ionized states during a single pulse and to explain the X-ray induced spectral lines shifts. This model provides easy estimation of spectral shifts, which is essential for experimental designs at XFELs, and illustrates that shorter X-ray pulses will not overcome sequential ionization but can reduce electron cascade effects.
Keywords: X-ray Free Electron Laser, X-ray Emission Spectroscopy, Sequential Ionization, X-ray induced Damage, Electronic Structure Analysis, X-ray Matter Interaction
Graphical Abstract
With the development of X-ray free electron laser (XFEL) sources there has been a paradigm shift in X-ray scattering and spectroscopy studies for physics, chemistry, biology and material sciences. With shorter (10–100 fs), more energetic (~1012 photons) pulses, scientist can now study the atomic structure of nanocrystals1, small molecules2 and envision obtaining atomic resolution images for large single particles.3 Ultrashort pulses also enable X-ray spectroscopic studies of chemical reactions with sub-picosecond resolution4–6, revealing fundamental transitions such as electron transfer and bond formation dynamics.7
While the X-ray community has been invigorated by these new opportunities, further research is required to understand the fundamental changes in the electronic structure of atoms due to the interaction with ultrashort (<100fs), intense X-ray pulses. In this regime, non-linear effects8–11 become significant as they distort electron energy levels and create new excited states.12–13 While there is limited understanding of how these modified electronic configurations can influence X-ray diffraction results or the single particle scattering analysis planned at future sources, X-ray spectroscopy can clearly be affected by the formation of electronic states beyond the one electron excitations typically analyzed at synchrotron sources, Figure 1. Understanding these effects will aid the development of the proper experimental protocols and interpretation of electronic structure measurements depending on time scales and intensities of the utilized X-ray pulses.
Here ions of a 3d transition metal (Mn2+) in a lighter element (O, C, H) environment are used as a model system for 3d transition metals in general and for the biologically relevant Mn4Ca cluster inside photosystem II14 in particular. Radiation induced damage to Mn centers in photosystem II at a synchrotron source is caused by chemical interaction of oxidized Mn ions with reactive species such as photoelectrons and OH radicals.15 As these damaging mechanisms require time for chemical redox processes to take place, they can be largely outrun at fs XFEL sources.16–19 However, the two other major sources of electronic changes are sequential X-ray absorption by a single atom, Figure 1, and secondary ionizations caused by released photoelectrons and Auger electrons.20–23 While these effects have been observed at XFELs previously, it remains unclear to what extent multiple ionization effects may impact interpretation of spectroscopic or crystallographic data.
Here effects of the intensity and duration of the XEFL pulse on the electronic structure of Mn ions was analyzed by X-ray emission spectroscopy (XES), Figure 2. The Kβ mainline emission spectrum is a result of the 3p to 1s transitions after a 1s core hole is created, Figure 1B–II. The exchange interaction between the newly created 3p hole and the valence electrons on the Mn 3d level leads to two spectral features with splitting sensitive to the oxidation state and spin state of Mn.24–27 XES in conjunction with XFEL pulses, is used to probe fast dynamics, dilute samples and new electronic states including surface chemistry4, solvent shell dynamics28, and electron transfer29. However, all these applications require collection of the classical (or singly ionized) spectra for proper interpretation.
Here XES is used to monitor emission from atoms absorbing one or more X-rays, where multiple ionizations induces changes to the spectra for 3d transition metal in low-Z (O, C, N) environments, such as photosystem II. The Mn Kβ XES spectra recorded from Mn2+ ions (jetted 1 Molar MnCl2 in H2O or ethanol, see SI Methods) are shown in Figure 2. Each panel represents one of four different XFEL pulse configurations recorded: 20 fs and 40 fs pulse durations using 6.9 keV incident photon energy and 16 fs and 34 fs at 8.7 keV incident photon energy. For each pulse configuration, the Mn Kβ1,3 peak shifts to lower energy as a function of pulse intensity. The onset of electronic structure changes in the Mn ion recorded using XFEL pulses creates a different XES spectra from the low flux regime, where only one X-ray is absorbed per atom, as Figures 1 & 2 illustrate.
To address the spectral shape change induced by sequential ionization we used theoretical modeling of electronic states obtained during a single XFEL pulse using rate equations20–21, 30 shown schematically in Figure 3A. The initial population starts in the ground state, , as Mn2+ with no 1s holes. During X-ray exposure the Mn atom will populate the different states labelled as where j is the current number of 1s holes in the atom (maximum of two) and k shows the total number of 1s absorption events the atom has undergone. Any atom in a specific state can advance forward through ionization of a 1s electron. The rate for this process, or absorption rate, is written as
where Φ is the photon flux density, or photons per area per time, and σj is the atomic photoelectric cross section for the 1s orbital with j holes in the same orbital. The atom can also go to a lower j state, downward in Figure 3A, by filling a 1s hole through Auger decay or fluorescence. These effects combined form the decay rate, , where j and k represent the state from which the decay occurs. The decay rate, the probability of Kβ emission, and the 1s cross sections were calculated using XATOM which has been described in detail elsewhere.23, 31–32 The beam profile was also assumed to be Gaussian making Φ radially dependent. The photon flux density was approximated stepwise to capture this dependence in the model as described in the SI Methods section.
Using this model the fractional population of Mn centers that has absorbed at least one X-ray, i.e. no longer in the state, is
where t is the pulse duration. Approximating the exponential portion, Ajt, as the parameter α which is defined in terms of basic experimental parameters using the full width half maximum of the X-ray spot size, the following is obtained
where σ0 is the photoelectric cross section for the filled 1s orbital of a single atom, half the photons per pulse is the number of photons in the FWHM profile of the x-ray beam and the Area is the spot size of the FWHM. Rewriting the absorbing fractional population, the following is obtained,
The parameter α is introduced here as it encapsulates most of the pulse duration, photon density and spot size behavior in the model allowing for an easy comparison of datasets with different X-ray parameters.
The Figure 3B shows the proportion of the Kβ emission spectra that result from fluorescent decay depicted by the same colors in Figure 3A as a function of α. From this plot, the onset of sequential ionization effects can be clearly seen and the percent of the emission signal recorded which corresponds to the classical emission spectra, shown in blue. This percent can be estimated for values of α in the highlighted linear region to be
This is a useful measure for understanding the convolution of emitting states when planning XES measurements at an XFEL.
The rate equation model can also be used to predict the X-ray induced shifts in the first moment of the Kβ1,3 peak by treating each electron hole as one oxidation state shift (see SI Methods). The first moment shift of each data set shown in Figure 2 is calculated as where Ei is the emission energy and Ii is the intensity of the spectrum using the energy between 6485–6495 eV with 0.1 eV bins. The change in first moment, typically used as an estimate for the oxidation state25 or localized spin density changes33, is shown for each data set in Figure 4 to indicate the sample’s electronic structure changes with increasing pulse intensity.
The model predictions shown in Figure 4 appears to be in good agreement with the FM shifts in the data. We do note, however, that while the model predicts a nearly identical α dependence for each set of parameters, the data appear to have additional dependence on the pulse duration and incident photon energy. These effects are likely a result of additional ionization processes caused by Auger and photoelectrons. The increasing cross section of light elements at lower energy and more secondary ionizations during longer pulse durations will likely result in larger spectral changes and FM shifts. Additionally, the datasets with different incident photon energies were taken during different beamtimes and small changes in the FWHM of the beam may also be responsible for some of the FM shift between the two photon energies used.
To predict the FM shift in XES data for Mn ions and other high spin 3d ions we refer to the linear regime in Figure 4. Here the first moment shift in the linear regime can be estimated, Figure 3B, 4, as
This simple analysis is useful in estimating tolerable photon densities based on XFEL parameters for experimental setups. This is important for some systems, such as photosystem II, where FM shifts of interest may be as small as ~0.02eV in the S2 to S3 state transition.25, 34 For detection of such small spectral changes it is clearly best to be removed from equivalent X-ray induced shifts estimated here, especially when additional effects from the electron cascade may be involved.
It is important to note that according to this prediction an α~0.5 was achieved in an earlier XFEL based study recording X-ray emission spectra of MnCl235. An uncertainty of the study ~0.05 eV for comparing XFEL and synchrotron data35 should not have precluded the detection of the expected shift of at least twice that of the uncertainty. As no detectable shift was observed the same X-ray beam parameters were used for XES analysis of PSII.36 While the source of discrepancy is currently unknown, we do emphasize that predictions provided here should be carefully considered when planning XFEL experiments.
As XFEL sources move toward shorter and shorter pulses it is important to take into account the prospective of shorter pulses to limit electronic and structural changes. For the electron cascade, it seems to be clear that shorter pulses will lead to fewer electron-electron interactions. From a sequential ionization standpoint the picture is more complicated. As shorter pulse durations with the same photon densities are used, a larger population of the atoms will reach the empty 1s state. Atoms in this state will decay twice to fully repopulate the 1s orbital. Since the emission from atoms in the 1s0 state is likely to be significantly shifted relative to the 1s1 single hole state emission37, the former emission is not expected to contribute to the final spectral shape and is not shown in Figure 3C. On the other hand, the subsequent emission will be from the 1s1 state and is expected to have spectral lines that overlap with the classical emission spectra. The second decay will have a higher probability of occurring in the presence of another low lying hole in the n=2 shell given the short amount of time after dual core hole decay and single core hole decay, Figure 1B–II. This is in contrast to longer pulses used here where the holes are in the n=3 level, Figure 1B–III, and are expected to lead to a different FM shift that that shown in Figure 4. Nevertheless, the percentage of classical emission spectra and spectra from sequential ionization will not be changed in as the race toward shorter X-ray pulses continues as is shown in Figure 3C.
Since sequential ionization is dependent on α, lowering the number of photons, increasing the beam spot size and increasing the incident photon energy all reduce the effect of sequential ionization. Out of the methods for reducing FM shifts, only increasing the X-ray spot size will not have a proportional reduction in the X-ray emission signal. Judging by our data, higher incident photon energies have the advantage over beam attenuation in that it will also reduce effects from photoelectrons of low z elements by lowering their cross section. Shorter pulses will also lead to fewer electron interactions within the sample during the duration of the pulse.
While the potential for outrunning the electron cascade is important, emission spectra will still have similar FM shift from sequential ionization, Figure 3C. Stimulated emission is one possible mechanism for increasing the emission intensity, however, the increased decay rate through stimulated emission may cause more sequential ionization events by refilling the 1s more rapidly allowing more ionizations. This process would lead to larger distortions to the spectra which explain this very phenomenon observed but not explained when recording stimulated emission spectra of Mn ions using this process.38 Ultrashort pulses can also lead to dual core hole ionization which create hypersatellite emission lines, or emission lines from the 1s0 state, that don’t overlap spectroscopically with single core hole emission spectra. This allows X-ray pulses which create dual ionization but are much shorter than the decay rate of these states to capture unaltered atomic hypersatellites, though various holes in surrounding atoms will likely impact the spectra of metal complexes as well as direct absorption of orbitals other than the 1s. While some work has been done with hypersatellites experimentally39, more groundwork will be required before hypersatellites can be validated as a widely applicable spectroscopic technique for XES.
Here we present a rate equation model that quantifies the percentages of recorded Kβ X-ray emission from atoms that have undergone a single or multiple sequential ionization events. Excellent agreement between the theoretical model and experimental observations has been demonstrated. Using these equations we provide a simple method to estimate the percent of classical vs sequential ionization spectra and the associated FM shift. Deviation from the sequential ionization model is attributed to electron cascade. Methods of avoiding effects from these two sources is also discussed. Additionally we note that shorter pulses do not overcome spectral changes that arise from sequential ionization and photon densities will have to be considered carefully in future facilities as more intense pulses become routinely available.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The experiments were carried out at the Linac Coherent Light Source during beamtimes LJ49 and LL23 (Pi Petra Fromme) at beamline CXI at LCLS, a national user facility operated by Stanford University on behalf of the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Basic Energy Sciences (OBES). Use of the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS), SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515. This work was supported by the following agencies: the National Science Foundation, Division of Chemistry CHE-1350909 (Y.P.) the National Institutes of Health (award 1R01GM095583), the National Science Foundation BioXFELScience Technology Center (award 1231306) and the Biodesign Center for Applied Structural at Arizona State University. This work was performed, in part, under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. M.F. was supported by the NIH grant 1R01GM117342-01.
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
Supporting Information. The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website. Methods and Procedures, Figures S1 and Table S1-S3.
REFERENCES
- 1.Chapman HN; Fromme P; Barty A; White TA; Kirian RA; Aquila A; Hunter MS; Schulz J; DePonte DP; Weierstall U, et al. Femtosecond X-ray protein nanocrystallography. Nature 2011, 470 (7332), 73–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Küpper J; Stern S; Holmegaard L; Filsinger F; Rouzée A; Rudenko A; Johnsson P; Martin AV; Adolph M; Aquila A, et al. X-ray diffraction from isolated and strongly aligned gas-phase molecules with a free-electron laser. Phys. Rev. Lett 2014, 112 (8), 083002. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aquila A; Barty A; Bostedt C; Boutet S; Carini G; DePonte D; Drell P; Doniach S; Downing KH; Earnest T, et al. The linac coherent light source single particle imaging road map. Struct. Dyn 2015, 2 (4), 041701–041701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Katayama T; Anniyev T; Beye M; Coffee R; Dell’Angela M; Föhlisch A; Gladh J; Kaya S; Krupin O; Nilsson A, et al. Ultrafast soft X-ray emission spectroscopy of surface adsorbates using an X-ray free electron laser. J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom 2013, 187, 9–14. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lemke HT; Bressler C; Chen LX; Fritz DM; Gaffney KJ; Galler A; Gawelda W; Haldrup K; Hartsock RW; Ihee H, et al. Femtosecond X-ray absorption spectroscopy at a hard X-ray free electron laser: application to spin crossover dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. A 2013, 117 (4), 735–740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.McFarland BK; Farrell JP; Miyabe S; Tarantelli F; Aguilar A; Berrah N; Bostedt C; Bozek JD; Bucksbaum PH; Castagna JC, et al. Ultrafast X-ray Auger probing of photoexcited molecular dynamics. Nat. Commun 2014, 5, 4235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Öström H; Öberg H; Xin H; LaRue J; Beye M; Dell’Angela M; Gladh J; Ng ML; Sellberg JA; Kaya S, et al. Probing the transition state region in catalytic CO oxidation on Ru. Science 2015, 347 (6225), 978–982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Doumy G; Roedig C; Son SK; Blaga CI; DiChiara AD; Santra R; Berrah N; Bostedt C; Bozek JD; Bucksbaum PH, et al. Nonlinear Atomic Response to Intense Ultrashort X Rays. Phys. Rev. Lett 2011, 106 (8), 083002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Larsson M; Salén P; van der Meulen P; Schmidt HT; Thomas RD; Feifel R; Piancastelli MN; Fang L; Murphy BF; Osipov T, et al. Double core-hole formation in small molecules at the LCLS free electron laser. J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys 2013, 46 (16), 164030–164030. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tamasaku K; Shigemasa E; Inubushi Y; Katayama T; Sawada K; Yumoto H; Ohashi H; Mimura H; Yabashi M; Yamauchi K, et al. X-ray two-photon absorption competing against single and sequential multiphoton processes. Nat. Photon 2014, 8 (4), 313–316. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fukuzawa H; Son SK; Motomura K; Mondal S; Nagaya K; Wada S; Liu XJ; Feifel R; Tachibana T; Ito Y, et al. Deep inner-shell multiphoton ionization by intense x-ray free-electron laser pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett 2013, 110 (17), 173005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kanter EP; Krässig B; Li Y; March AM; Ho P; Rohringer N; Santra R; Southworth SH; DiMauro LF; Doumy G, et al. Unveiling and Driving Hidden Resonances with High-Fluence, High-Intensity X-Ray Pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett 2011, 107 (23), 233001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ho PJ; Bostedt C; Schorb S; Young L Theoretical tracking of resonance-enhanced multiple ionization pathways in X-ray free-electron laser pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett 2014, 113 (25), 253001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Vinyard D; Brudvig G; Johnson M; Martinez T Progress Toward a Molecular Mechanism of Water Oxidation in Photosystem II. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem 2017, 68, 101–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Davis KM; Kosheleva I; Henning RW; Seidler GT; Pushkar Y Kinetic modeling of the X-ray-induced damage to a metalloprotein. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117 (31), 9161–9169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Suga M; Akita F; Hirata K; Ueno G; Murakami H; Nakajima Y; Shimizu T; Yamashita K; Yamamoto M; Ago H, et al. Native structure of photosystem II at 1.95 Å resolution viewed by femtosecond X-ray pulses. Nature 2014, 517 (7532), 99–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Young ID; Ibrahim M; Chatterjee R; Gul S; Fuller FD; Koroidov S; Brewster AS; Tran R; Alonso-Mori R; Kroll T, et al. Structure of photosystem II and substrate binding at room temperature. Nature 2016, 540 (7633), 453–457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Suga M; Akita F; Sugahara M; Kubo M; Nakajima Y; Nakane T; Yamashita K; Umena Y; Nakabayashi M; Yamane T, et al. Light-induced structural changes and the site of O=O bond formation in PSII caught by XFEL. Nature 2017, 543 (7643), 131–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kupitz C; Basu S; Grotjohann I; Fromme R; Zatsepin NA; Rendek KN; Hunter MS; Shoeman RL; White TA; Wang D, et al. Serial time-resolved crystallography of photosystem II using a femtosecond X-ray laser. Nature 2014, 513 (7517), 261–265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Young L; Kanter EP; Krassig B; Li Y; March AM; Pratt ST; Santra R; Southworth SH; Rohringer N; Dimauro LF, et al. Femtosecond electronic response of atoms to ultra-intense X-rays. Nature 2010, 466 (7302), 56–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rohringer N; Santra R X-ray nonlinear optical processes using a self-amplified spontaneous emission free-electron laser. Phys. Rev. A 2007, 76 (3), 033416. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cryan JP; Glownia JM; Andreasson J; Belkacem A; Berrah N; Blaga CI; Bostedt C; Bozek J; Buth C; Dimauro LF, et al. Auger electron angular distribution of double core-hole states in the molecular reference frame. Phys. Rev. Lett 2010, 105 (8), 083004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jurek Z; Son SK; Ziaja B; Santra R XMDYN and XATOM: versatile simulation tools for quantitative modeling of X-ray free-electron laser induced dynamics of matter. J. Appl. Crystallogr 2016, 49, 1048–1056. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Glatzel P; Bergmann U High resolution 1s core hole X-ray spectroscopy in 3d transition metal complexes - electronic and structural information. Coord. Chem. Rev 2005, 249 (1–2), 65–95. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Messinger J; Robblee JH; Bergmann U; Fernandez C; Glatzel P; Visser H; Cinco RM; McFarlane KL; Bellacchio E; Pizarro SA, et al. Absence of Mn-Centered Oxidation in the S2 to S3 Transition: Implications for the Mechanism of Photosynthetic Water Oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2001, 123, 7804–7820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tsutsumi K; Nakamori H; Ichikawa K X-ray manganese K.beta. emission spectra of manganese oxides and manganates. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys 1976, 13 (2), 929–933. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Peng G; deGroot FMF; Hämäläinen K; Moore JA; Wang X; Grush MM; Hastings JB; Siddons DP; Armstrong WH; Mullins OC, et al. High-Resolution Manganese X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy. Oxidation-State and Spin-State Sensitivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1994, 116, 2914–2920. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Haldrup K; Gawelda W; Abela R; Alonso-Mori R; Bergmann U; Bordage A; Cammarata M; Canton SE; Dohn AO; van Driel TB, et al. Observing Solvation Dynamics with Simultaneous Femtosecond X-ray Emission Spectroscopy and X-ray Scattering. J. Phys. Chem. B 2016, 120, 1158–1168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Canton SE; Kjær KS; Vankó G; van Driel TB; Adachi S; Bordage A; Bressler C; Chabera P; Christensen M; Dohn AO, et al. Visualizing the non-equilibrium dynamics of photoinduced intramolecular electron transfer with femtosecond X-ray pulses. Nat. Commun 2015, 6, 6359–6359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Makris MG; Lambropoulos P; Mihelic A Theory of Multiphoton Multielectron Ionization of Xenon under Strong 93-eV Radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett 2009, 102 (3), 033002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Son S-K; Young L; Santra R Impact of hollow-atom formation on coherent x-ray scattering at high intensity. Phys. Rev. A 2011, 83 (3), 033402. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jurek Z; Santra R; Son S-K; Ziaja B XRAYPAC - a software package for modeling x-ray-induced dynamics of matter, 1.01; CFEL, DESY, 2017.
- 33.Jensen SC; Davis KM; Sullivan B; Hartzler DA; Seidler GT; Casa DM; Kasman E; Colmer HE; Massie AA; Jackson TA, et al. X-ray Emission Spectroscopy of Biomimetic Mn Coordination Complexes. J. Phys. Chem. Lett 2017, 8 (12), 2584–2589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Davis KM; Sullivan BT; Palenik MC; Yan LF; Purohit V; Robison G; Kosheleva I; Henning RW; Seidler GT; Pushkar Y Rapid Evolution of the Photosystem II Electronic Structure during Water Splitting. Phys. Rev. X 2018, 8 (4), 041014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Alonso-Mori R; Kern J; Gildea RJ; Sokaras D; Weng T-C; Lassalle-Kaiser B; Tran R; Hattne J; Laksmono H; Hellmich J, et al. Energy-dispersive X-ray emission spectroscopy using an X-ray free-electron laser in a shot-by-shot mode. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2012, 109 (47), 19103–19107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kern J; Alonso-Mori R; Tran R; Hattne J; Gildea RJ; Echols N; Glöckner C; Hellmich J; Laksmono H; Sierra RG, et al. Simultaneous femtosecond X-ray spectroscopy and diffraction of photosystem II at room temperature. Science 2013, 340 (6131), 491–495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rosmej FB; Dachicourt R; Deschaud B; Khaghani D; Dozières M; Šmíd M; Renner O Exotic x-ray emission from dense plasmas. J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys 2015, 48 (22), 224005. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kroll T; Weninger C; Alonso-Mori R; Sokaras D; Zhu D; Mercadier L; Majety V; Marinelli A; Lutman A; Guetg M, et al. Stimulated X-Ray Emission Spectroscopy in Transition Metal Complexes. Phys. Rev. Lett 2018, 120 (13), 133203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Berrah N; Fang L; Murphy B; Osipov T; Ueda K; Kukk E; Feifel R; van der Meulen P; Salen P; Schmidt HT, et al. Double-core-hole spectroscopy for chemical analysis with an intense X-ray femtosecond laser. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2011, 108 (41), 16912–16915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.