Skip to main content
Annals of Translational Medicine logoLink to Annals of Translational Medicine
. 2020 Feb;8(4):52. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.11.124

Study on the correlation among dysbacteriosis, imbalance of cytokine and the formation of intrauterine adhesion

Xingping Zhao 1, Qun Zhao 1, Xiuting Zhu 1, Huan Huang 1, Xing Wan 2, Rui Guo 2, Yanqiu Zhao 2, Dan Chen 2,, Dabao Xu 1,
PMCID: PMC7049045  PMID: 32175346

Abstract

Background

Intrauterine adhesion (IUA) is one of the most important causes of female infertility, while iatrogenic endometrial injury is the main, but not the entire, cause of IUA. The microorganisms of the female reproductive tract play an important role in its health and disease. The imbalance of immune regulation caused by the imbalance of reproductive tract dysbacteriosis may be an important link in the formation mechanism of uterine cavity adhesion.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled 30 patients diagnosed with IUA and 30 women with a history of intrauterine surgery, but without IUA, as control subjects. All participants were diagnosed with hysteroscopy while two swabs—one being leucorrhea drawn from the middle of the vagina and the other being cervical mucus drawn from the cervical canal—were taken. The bacterial load and community were identified by 16S rDNA quantitative polymerase chain reaction and pyrosequencing. Immunocytokines in serum were quantitatively detected by human T-helper cytokine kit. The correlation between Th cytokines and microorganisms in IUA and non-IUA groups was analyzed.

Results

Compared with non-IUA participants at the phylum level, patients with IUA had a significantly higher percentage of firmicutes in most samples, while the diversity of bacteria was significantly decreased. Some species that were members of vaginal and cervical canal bacterial phyla, including Euryarchaeota, Acidobacteria, Chlamydiae, Chlorobi, Planctomycetes and TM6 (Dependentiae), almost disappeared. The quantity in serum of IUA patients of classical proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-γ, released from immune cells, also known as profibrotic cytokines, were significantly higher than that of the non-IUA women in our study (P<0.05)

Conclusions

IUA is characterized by an increased bacterial burden, decreased diversity of bacterial communities in the vagina/cervical canal, and increased immune cytokines of pro-fibrosis, which may predict new and more effective therapeutic schemes for the treatment of IUA.

Keywords: Intrauterine adhesion (IUA), vaginal microbe, cytokines

Introduction

Intrauterine adhesion (IUA) was first reported by Joseph Asherman, and is thus also known as Asherman syndrome (1,2). Most patients with IUAs have fibrous band adhesions formed in the anterior and posterior walls of the uterus, and these vascular fibrous tissue adhesion bands are accompanied by different amounts of white blood cell infiltration (3). Adhesions begin to form when fibers and inflammatory exudate appear on the surface of the damaged endometrium, and then gradually develop into denser fibrous bands, eventually forming mass adhesions. Adhesion can lead to partial or total uterine cavity obliteration which reduces the implantation area of embryos. IUA hinders the endometrial blood supply and reduces the endometrial receptivity which is not conducive to the growth of the embryos (4,5). The common clinical manifestations of IUA include hypomenorrhea, amenorrhea, recurrent abortion, and secondary infertility. There are various causes of IUAs (6), and its prevalence rate increases yearly, which is mainly due to the increased incidence of iatrogenic endometrial trauma such as artificial abortion and postpartum curettage. Other causes include genital tuberculosis, pelvic irradiation, and uterine surgery (including myomectomy and surgery for uterine malformation, etc.) (7). Hooker et al. (8) reported that curettage was the most important reason for the formation of IUA during pregnancy. Iatrogenic endometrial trauma is the main cause of IUA, but this alone cannot fully explain the mechanism of adhesion formation. It is necessary to explore the potential pathogenic factors of IUA, so as to formulate specific preventive measures for IUA based on the study of these factors.

Here, we investigated the role of the uterine microenvironment: the microbiome in the formation mechanism of IUA. It has been known for some time that the microbiome of the female reproductive tract plays an important role both in maintaining a healthy state and in the development of diseases in the female reproductive system. It is also widely acknowledged that lactic acid-producing microorganisms dominate the vaginal microbial community (9), maintaining a relatively healthy reproductive tract microenvironment by lowering the vaginal PH value. Previous studies have shown that vaginal dysbacteriosis will lead to a variety of diseases, such as postpartum endometritis, preterm delivery, pelvic inflammatory disease, spontaneous abortion, delivery of low-birth-weight babies, etc. (10-12).

The etiology and progression mechanism of IUA caused by microorganisms is similar to that of other damaged tissues and organs with fibrosis (13). Tissue damage and bacterial imbalance not only promote inflammation, but also release a large number of proinflammatory and profibrotic cytokines by recruiting and activating innate and adaptive immune systems. For example, when infected by bacteria, Th1 response results in a release of large amounts of proinflammatory cytokines for the clearance of pathogens. The damaged tissues need an immune response, mainly of a profibrotic nature that is conducive to tissue repair. Meanwhile, a set of cytokines, including IL-25, IL-33, TSLP il-25, il-33, and TSLP are released by damaged epithelial cells, while other cells can directly or indirectly promote the development of Th2 immune response that promotes fibrosis (14). In previous studies, many researchers have discussed the specific immune pathways and immune cytokines that lead to fibrosis. However, few studies have directly investigated the relationship between the microbes in the uterine environment and the immune response induced by these microbes in the formation of IUAs. As far as we know, the pathological changes of IUA also affect the physiology and metabolites of the uterus, further affecting the diversity of vaginal microorganisms. Therefore, we investigated the association and interaction among IUA and microbes in the vagina. In this study, the data of 30 IUA patients and 30 healthy women were collected to analyze the correlation among vaginal microorganisms, immune cytokines, and the formation of IUAs.

Methods

The trial enrolled 30 women aged between 20 and 40 years who were newly diagnosed with IUA during hysteroscopy examination at the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University between January 1st, 2018, and May 31st, 2018, IUAs were scored by one surgeon applying the American Fertility Society (AFS) classification system (15) (IUA group). IUAs were scored as follows: 1–4 (mild), 5–8 (moderate), and 9–12 (severe). Thirty women aged between 20 and 40 years who took routine gynecological health examination including hysteroscopy in the same hospital during the same period were recruited as the control group (non-IUA group). None of the participants had used vaginal medications, received cervical treatment, or performed douching within the previous 7 days, nor had they engaged in sexual activity within the previous 2 days. All participants had a history of uterine cavity operation, and none were diagnosed with endocrine or autoimmune disorders, cancer, severe pelvic adhesion, hysteromyoma, endometriosis, adenomyosis, or acute inflammation. All participants were subjected to two swabs by a doctor: one of leucorrhea drawn from the middle of the vagina (marked zhong) and one of cervical mucus drawn from the cervical canal (marked kou) in the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. All swabs were used to collect vaginal specimens which were immediately stored at −80 °C for DNA extraction, while anticoagulant blood vessels were centrifuged to separate the serum for cytokine detection.

DNA was extracted from 120 samples by using Fast DNA® SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals) according to manufacturer’s protocols, and the concentration and quality of purified DNA was determined via a spectrophotometer at 230 nm (A230) and 260 nm (A260; NanoDrop). Subsequently, the V3 and V4 region of the bacterial 16S rDNA gene was amplified by PCR using the following primers: 341FCCTACGGGNBGCASCAG/805RGACTACNVGGGTATCTAATCC. PCR reactions were performed in a 25 µL mixture containing 5 µL of 5× GC Buffer, 0.5 µL of KAPA dNTP Mix, 0.5 µL of KAPA HiFi HotStart DNA Polymerase, 0.5 µL of each primer (10 pM), and 50–100 ng of template DNA. PCR reaction cycling included 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 25 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. PCR clean up used AMPure XP beads to purify the 16S V3 and V4 amplicon away from the free primers and primer dimer species. Purified product was amplified by PCR using the following primers: 341F CCTACGGGNBGCASCAG/805R GACTACNVGGGTATCTAATCC, where the barcode was an eight-base sequence unique to each sample. PCR reactions were performed in 25 µL mixture containing 5 µL of 5× GC Buffer, 0.75 µL of KAPA dNTP Mix, 0.5 µL of KA-PA HiFi HotStart DNA Polymerase, 1.5 µL of each primer (10 pM), and 5 µL of purified product. PCR reaction cycling included 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 8 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The amplicons were subsequently purified by AMPure XP beads to clean up the final library before quantification. Last, purified amplicons were pooled in equimolar and paired-end sequenced (2×250) on an Illumina MiSeq platform according to the standard protocols.

Fast Length Adjustment of SHort reads (FLASH) was used to merge paired-end reads from next-generation sequencing (1). Low-quality reads were filtered by fastq_quality_filter (-p 90 -q 25 -Q33) in FASTX Toolkit 0.0.14, and chimera reads were removed by USEARCH 64 bit v8.0.1517. The number of reads for each sample was normalized based on the smallest size of samples by random subtraction. OTUs were aligned by the UCLUST algorithm with a 97% identity, and taxonomically classified using the SILVA 16S rRNA database v128. Alpha and beta diversities were generated in the Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) and calculated based on weighted and unweighted Unifrac distance matrices.

Th1/Th2 cytokines in serum samples were quantified by Legendplex Assay (Human T helper Cytokine Panel, BioLegend). The correlation between Th cytokines and microorganisms was analyzed.

Results

Basic clinical characteristics of participants

Between January 1st, 2018, and May 31st, 2018, 60 women were recruited to either the IUA group (30 patients with IUA) or the non-IUA group (30 healthy women). Baseline characteristics between the two groups including age, height, weight, BMI, IUD, and other gynecological diseases and endocrine disorders, showed no statistical differences (Table 1). Two groups of participants had a 1- or 2-time history of induced abortion, AFS scores were moderate to severe in the IUA group patients (11 moderate IUA, 19 severe IUA), and no adhesions were diagnosed in the non-IUA group. Each participant was subjected to a vaginal swab (marked zhong) and a cervical canal swab (marked kou); a total of 120 samples were available for high-throughput sequencing.

Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study groups.

Basic clinical characteristics VD (n=30) CD (n=30) P value
Age (year), mean ± SD 30.90±4.31 31.6±4.42 0.561
Height (m), mean ± SD 1.59±0.04 1.58±0.06 0.526
Weight (kg), mean ± SD 54.78±7.12 53.37±6.29 0.418
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD 21.60±2.46 21.30±2.19 0.639
IUD, n (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) NE
Other gynecological disease, n (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) NE
Endocrine disorders, n (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) NE

SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; NE, not estimable (due to nullity of category in both groups); IUD, intrauterine device.

Data quality control and optimization

Samples were distinguished according to barcode sequences, and the extracted data were stored in the standard fastq files. Data quality evaluation of sequencing samples was conducted according to the fastq file. The number of paired reads in the sample, the base ratio with Q value greater than 20, the mass value in the sample higher than 30, and the GC content of the sample data are listed in Table 2.

Table 2. Sequencing sample data output and quality evaluation statistics.

Sample PE_reads Q20 (%) Q30 (%) GC (%)
Sample (VD)
   A101kou 7702 97.66 95.89 51.99
   A101zhong 137219 97.73 96.03 52.48
   A102kou 129313 97.88 96.25 54.06
   A102zhong 158034 97.87 96.20 53.62
   A103kou 147018 97.90 96.33 53.48
   A103zhong 137450 97.78 96.12 53.55
   A104kou 144249 97.33 95.71 53.24
   A104zhong 164513 97.69 96.09 53.66
   A105kou 165721 96.78 95.12 52.15
   A105zhong 122235 97.71 96.09 51.85
   A55kou 135442 97.56 95.90 51.66
   A55zhong 118568 97.77 96.08 50.83
   A56kou 159992 96.29 94.62 51.86
   A56zhong 149826 97.66 96.00 52.42
   A57kou 138006 97.81 96.25 51.85
   A57zhong 139832 97.76 96.15 52.04
   A59kou 147775 97.85 96.25 52.06
   A59zhong 135591 97.71 96.09 51.97
   A62kou 144575 97.75 96.15 52.25
   A62zhong 124962 97.88 96.26 51.82
   A63kou 148910 97.85 96.28 51.97
   A63zhong 127930 96.90 95.26 51.82
   A65kou 140301 97.43 95.86 51.85
   A65zhong 136975 97.88 96.29 52.00
   A67kou 190662 97.38 95.84 52.56
   A67zhong 180826 93.56 91.86 51.88
   A68kou 146383 97.73 96.17 52.39
   A68zhong 137618 97.87 96.30 52.06
   A74kou 162131 97.02 95.37 52.45
   A74zhong 139848 97.48 95.84 52.19
   A75kou 219948 90.84 88.99 51.31
   A75zhong 151254 97.83 96.22 52.13
   A77kou 163859 97.35 95.79 51.97
   A77zhong 149796 97.64 96.09 52.25
   A78kou 153324 97.76 96.15 52.23
   A78zhong 146487 97.81 96.18 52.01
   A82kou 145602 97.74 96.15 52.06
   A82zhong 166547 97.01 95.36 52.14
   A84kou 152770 97.56 95.94 52.31
   A84zhong 153188 98.01 96.46 52.19
   A85kou 151276 97.99 96.48 52.16
   A85zhong 150678 97.68 96.06 52.35
   A86kou 168598 97.40 95.81 52.35
   A86zhong 178303 97.71 96.09 51.81
   A88kou 163560 97.82 96.21 53.23
   A88zhong 142423 97.77 96.13 53.22
   A89kou 142954 97.30 95.68 52.13
   A89zhong 150183 97.80 96.15 51.65
   A90kou 133372 97.63 95.97 52.20
   A90zhong 179171 97.77 96.11 52.52
   A92kou 170181 97.34 95.74 52.44
   A92zhong 160550 97.84 96.19 52.04
   A95kou 89529 97.33 95.71 53.15
   A95zhong 137312 96.80 95.14 51.98
   A96kou 170898 97.51 95.90 52.19
   A96zhong 147055 97.93 96.36 51.92
   A97kou 145110 97.80 96.15 52.36
   A97zhong 134741 97.87 96.19 52.65
   A98kou 176908 97.61 96.05 52.71
   A98zhong 138250 97.86 96.23 52.57
Sample (CD)
   B45kou 164485 91.62 89.74 50.67
   B45zhong 106021 97.15 95.44 52.14
   B46kou 158701 95.22 93.53 51.15
   B46zhong 152103 96.23 94.57 52.07
   B47kou 196685 94.39 92.70 52.07
   B47zhong 184698 91.86 90.05 51.79
   B48kou 175716 91.76 89.95 51.50
   B48zhong 137551 92.64 90.93 52.22
   B50kou 142384 94.40 92.65 51.91
   B50zhong 139164 93.14 91.36 51.38
   B51kou 144403 96.19 94.63 49.57
   B51zhong 121438 97.86 96.29 49.11
   B53kou 174179 84.30 81.95 50.05
   B53zhong 122428 93.59 91.86 51.52
   B54kou 182883 94.45 92.76 51.91
   B54zhong 158752 92.72 90.99 51.09
   B55kou 165246 96.89 95.26 53.00
   B55zhong 133782 97.77 96.20 53.35
   B58kou 140464 94.06 92.32 52.29
   B58zhong 159405 96.00 94.37 53.23
   B59kou 172022 95.80 94.15 52.16
   B59zhong 139824 95.67 94.03 51.87
   B60kou 158457 93.91 92.25 51.89
   B60zhong 136713 95.88 94.31 51.70
   B62kou 143449 93.70 91.95 51.94
   B62zhong 165476 94.18 92.43 51.86
   B63kou 135867 95.00 93.34 51.52
   B63zhong 158737 96.24 94.60 51.03
   B64kou 174318 95.00 93.27 52.07
   B64zhong 142343 95.13 93.43 52.01
   B65kou 185074 90.67 88.80 51.14
   B65zhong 146121 93.47 91.63 51.90
   B66kou 174426 93.47 91.75 51.75
   B66zhong 203522 92.99 91.22 51.39
   B67kou 181635 92.17 90.38 51.42
   B67zhong 122453 97.03 95.43 52.32
   B68kou 141852 94.35 92.65 51.83
   B68zhong 139997 94.76 93.07 51.80
   B69kou 144565 87.20 85.12 51.02
   B69zhong 232848 86.72 84.62 50.57
   B70kou 101082 96.37 94.77 52.70
   B70zhong 162161 97.73 96.12 52.92
   B71kou 150398 91.81 90.01 51.31
   B71zhong 123454 95.50 93.78 51.09
   B72kou 161306 96.11 94.47 51.73
   B72zhong 153212 96.97 95.37 51.75
   B73kou 188604 91.29 89.43 51.17
   B73zhong 165029 84.44 82.28 50.15
   B74kou 179825 96.50 94.99 52.05
   B74zhong 326549 83.51 81.04 49.50
   B75kou 128424 96.36 94.75 52.17
   B75zhong 168641 96.71 95.06 52.20
   B76kou 188426 89.99 88.11 51.40
   B76zhong 131517 97.40 95.77 52.65
   B77kou 174054 88.58 86.67 50.70
   B77zhong 108945 92.95 91.21 51.22
   B78kou 164436 93.73 91.99 51.43
   B78zhong 141726 95.54 93.62 51.84
   B79kou 186324 90.85 88.99 51.55
   B79zhong 166931 88.20 86.19 50.97

Operational taxonomic unit (OTU) clustering and species notes

As indicated by the 97% sequence similarity level, Uclust method in the QIIME software package was used for OTU clustering analysis. The classification results of all the samples at the levels of phylum, class, order, family, and genus were analyzed. Based on the cumulative histogram of species in the top 15 of abundance, the microorganism composition differences among samples were compared and presented in a list. The community structure analysis results of the whole sample at the phylum and genus level are shown in Figure 1. At the phylum level, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria Bacteroidetes, and Fusobacteria constituted five of the most predominant phyla in the following regions: the cervical canal of the IUA group (69.55%, 11.05%, 6.85%, 8.40%, and 1.53%, respectively), the middle of the vagina of the IUA group (69.20%, 11.16%, 6.84%, 8.38% and 1.53%, respectively), the cervical canal of the non-IUA group (41.67%, 14.03%, 14.10%, 11.90%, and 8.61%, respectively), and the middle of the vagina of the non-IUA group (41.68%, 14.41%, 14.03%, 11.77%, and 8.61%, respectively). In the IUA group, the proportion of Firmicutes in most samples was more than 60%, while the diversity of bacteria was significantly reduced, with, for example, the Euryarchaeota, Acidobacteria, Chlamydiae, Chlorobi, Planctomycetes, and TM 6 (Dependentiae) phyla almost all disappearing. Statistical analysis also showed that the proportion of Firmicutes in IUA group was significantly higher than that in non-IUA group, and there were significant differences in Lactobacillus, Cetobacterium and Bifidobacterium (P<0.05) (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The cumulative histogram of species in the top 15 of abundance at the phylum (A) and genus (B) level.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Significant differences of species between the IUA and non-IUA groups in the vagina (A) and cervical canal (B) at the phylum level. IUA, intrauterine adhesion.

Alpha diversity analysis

The Alpha diversity index includes the species abundance (chao1, ACE), the diversity index of integrating species abundance and uniformity (Shannon, Simpson), and the observed species, which reflects the low OTU coverage of samples in Good’s coverage and OTU number. Among them, abundance measures species in a single sample by estimating the OTU number, while the diversity index measures the heterogeneity of communities. As shown in Figure 3, the species diversity in the middle vagina and cervix of the IUA group was significantly lower than that of the non-IUA group, and the species diversity in the middle vagina of the IUA group was the lowest (P<0.001).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Alpha diversity analysis in the middle vagina and cervix of the IUA group was significantly different from that of the non-IUA group. IUA, intrauterine adhesion.

Beta diversity analysis

The principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was based on the distance matrix to find the principal coordinates. Through a series of eigenvalues and eigenvectors following sorting, the top several main characteristic values were selected to effectively to find the “main” elements and structure between the two groups of sample data visualization of similarities or differences (Figure 4). The abundance and composition of species in the vagina and cervix were more similar in the same group, but the difference between the groups was significant.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

PCoA of Beta diversity analysis for the abundance and composition of species in the vagina and cervix between the groups.

Differences of cytokines in the IUA and non-IUA groups

The cytokine kit quantitatively detected 13 human cytokines secreted by Th1/Th2 immune cells, including IL-2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13, 17A, 17F, 21, 22, along with IFN-γ, and TNF-α. IL-6 and IFN-γ were significantly different between the two groups, with the IUA group being significantly higher than the non-IUA group (P<0.05). Correlation analysis was conducted between immune cytokines and microbial genera, and the correlation heat map is shown in Figure 5. At the genus level, Aerophilus, Brevundimonas, Ezakiella, Mobiluncus, Peptoniphilus, and Prevotella 6 were highly correlated with cytokines.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Correlation heat map between immune cytokines and microbial genus level.

Discussion

With the wide application of hysteroscopy in clinical practice, the incidence and diagnosis rate of IUA in females of childbearing age has sharply increased to 2.2–36.8% (16,17). Iatrogenic endometrial trauma is the primary condition of IUA, which is mainly caused by curettage during pregnancy. It has been reported that more than 90% of IUAs are caused by curettage (18,19). Other causes include removal of pregnancy residues, cesarean section, diagnostic curettage, myomectomy, and correction of uterine anomalies. Taskin et al. reported that IUA could be formed after hysteroscopic myomectomy, with a probability of 31.3% (20). If multiple myomectomy was performed, the incidence of IUA would rise to 45.5%, and 6.7% after hysteroscopic resection of a septum. Although hysteroscopic adhesiolysis (HA) has been widely used in clinic (21), the high recurrence rate of IUA and poor pregnancy outcomes after HA present a great challenge for clinical treatment and prevention (22).

To date, researchers have studied the role of microorganisms in the lower reproductive tract in reproductive system tumors, vaginitis, adverse pregnancy, and other diseases (23-29); however, the interaction between vaginal microbiota, immune response, and IUA has not been investigated.

Microorganisms are the richest source of biodiversity on earth. The investigation of microbial diversity has important theoretical and practical significance for human diseases, environmental governance, and the exploitation and utilization of microbial resources. The human-coexisting microorganisms have important influences on human growth and development, physiology and pathology, immunity, nutrition metabolism, and other processes (30-35). Most of these microbiotas have a mutually beneficial relationship with their human hosts, and only a few opportunistic pathogens can cause chronic infections or other serious diseases under certain conditions. These microbial communities are also considered the body’s first line of defense against foreign pathogens, competing to eliminate other invasive pathogens. As is well known, the symbiotic microorganisms are very important to the human body, but incredibly, people know little about the community composition and function of the microorganisms. Furthermore, we barely understand how microorganisms interact with each other, or how they can form a balanceable ecoenvironment. At present, many investigators are focusing on the research of human microorganisms, in order to get a better idea of the real role of these microorganisms in human health and disease (36).

There are many kinds of microorganisms in the vagina, and 29 kinds of microorganisms have been isolated from vaginal secretions (37-39). The most important one is lactobacillus (40,41), and the other microflora present in the vagina are mainly composed of bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and virus. Under normal circumstances, the microbes in the vagina can reach an equilibrium state. Any factors that cause vaginal microecological imbalance can lead to inflammation, such as long-term application of antibiotics, frequent intercourse, vaginal flush, and a decline in estrogen (42). The balance of vaginal microecology can effectively resist the invasion of various foreign pathogens. The female reproductive tract is highly susceptible to bacterial infection. Once the immunity of the body is reduced, foreign bacteria or parasitic bacteria in the body may increase infection, causing cervicitis, endometritis, etc. (43). The main cause of IUA is injury to the endometrium associated with reproductive tract infection. Patients with IUA are usually infected with a variety of reproductive tract pathogens. Once these pathogens invade the vagina, they can enter the uterine cavity through the cervix, causing endometritis, salpingitis, or pelvic inflammatory disease. Abortion preoperative cervicitis or endometritis in the case of no cure pre-abortion can lead bacteria into the uterine cavity and then cause intrauterine infection or increase the chances of IUA formation. In this study, compared with the control group, patients with IUA had a higher bacterial load and density, but less diversity in the vagina/cervix, a condition which may cause persistent damage by pathogens in the impairment of the endometrium. Some of the bacterial communities in IUA patients that disappeared in our study may play an important role in maintaining the health of the reproductive tract, and their absence may lead to a compromised repair function of the endometrium. After the iatrogenic injury of the endometrium occurred, the load of the opportunistic bacteria increased and the essential bacteria became absent, so that the normal repair function of endometrium tissue was reduced and replaced by fiber repair which lost normal function.

To our knowledge, tissue injury and inflammation are important causes of tissue fibrosis. This study focused on the pathways from tissue damage and inflammation to fibrosis. The vaginal immune function is a component of the systemic immune function, including humoral and cellular immunity. The functions of systemic and local immunity jointly form an immune response network. When the local mucosa is attacked by pathogens, the immune response will quickly be generated in the blood and other mucosal sites. Some immune mediators released by immune T cells have both profibrotic and antifibrotic properties. After iatrogenic damage to the endometrium, pathological biological bacteria of the vagina and cervical canal invade into the endometrium, causing local inflammation and triggering the immune response of the endometrium, which will eliminate some pathogenic microorganisms and further change the composition of bacteria. Endometrial injury destroys the function of the surface barrier and increases the entry of harmless symbiotic bacteria or their products into the endometrium, resulting in the aggravation of the inflammatory response and fibrosis repair of the endometrium. Immune Th cells can be divided into two subgroups according to different functions, TH1 and TH2 cells, which play an important role in Th response. For inflammatory diseases, most available literature shows that Th1 expression is weak, while Th2 expression is strong, leading to the imbalance of TH1 with TH2. Cytokines secreted by immune Th cells are key regulators of immune responses to health and disease. As mentioned above, damaged endometrial epithelial cells release a series of immune cytokines, which directly or indirectly promote the development of Th2 immune response that is thought to promote fibrosis (44). The innate immune cells can release classical proinflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-1, and TNF-γ which are also profibrotic. In our study, the IL-6 and IFN-γ quantities in the serum of IUA patients were significantly higher than those of the non-IUA women (P<0.05). In repeated peritonitis models, inflammatory Th1 cells and cytokines IL-6 and IFN-γ are essential factors in the occurrence and development of fibrosis (45). It was found that cytokine IL-6 increased the Th1 cell survival rate and up-regulated IFN-γ production, while negative feedback decreased MMP activity. Therefore, the fibrogenic effect of IL-6 is mainly due to the reduced degradation of matrix protein. Other studies have explained the role of IL-6 in promoting fibrosis by regulating the TGF-β pathway (46,47). Profibrotic effects of IL-6 were observed in fibrosis models of different organs, including the lung (48,49), heart (50,51), kidney (47), and eye (52).

Microorganisms play a role in mediating inflammation/immune response to trigger related pathways, a phenomenon which has become an area of intense research. IUAs seriously endanger the reproductive health of childbearingage females, and its pathogenesis is complex. Therefore, it is important to study the pathogenesis of IUAs and to find effective treatment. We analyzed the differences of vaginal microbiological structure between patients with IUA and healthy women. Our study found that vaginal microbial imbalance can cause endometrial inflammation and inflammation factors or related cytokines released in great quantities. Proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IFN-γ were massively increased in IUA patients and played a role in promoting fibrosis, which in turn caused fibrinogen accumulation, extracellular matrix deposition, and eventually induced IUAs. A comprehensive understanding of microorganisms and immune function will allow us to better clarify the role of microorganisms and immune function in the development of IUA. From a new perspective of vaginal dysbacteriosis mediating a Th1-Th2 imbalance, the mechanism of IUA was revealed. Moreover, it was found that fibrosis could be successfully prevented by inhibiting pathogens, inflammatory factors, and cytokines. These findings provide a new platform for the prevention and treatment of IUA targeted at microbial and cytokine intervention.

Acknowledgments

Funding: This study is supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No.2018YFC1004800), Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81671492), the Hunan Science and Technology Department (Grant No. 2018SK2102) and Hunan Education Department (Grant No. XJK011CGD001).

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Approval was given to the study by The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Third Xiangya Hospital and Xiangya Hospital, Central South University. The procedure was performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was obtained after the procedure was fully explained from all participants and their legal guardians.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  • 1.Asherman JG. Amenorrhoea traumatica (atretica). J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 1948;55:23-30. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1948.tb07045.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tan IF, Robertson M. The role of imaging in the investigation of Asherman's syndrome. Australas J Ultrasound Med 2011;14:15-8. 10.1002/j.2205-0140.2011.tb00118.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Foix A, Bruno RO, Davison T, et al. The pathology of postcurettage intrauterine adhesions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1966;96:1027-33. 10.1016/0002-9378(66)90452-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Salma U, Xue M, Md Sayed AS, et al. Efficacy of intrauterine device in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:589296. 10.1155/2014/589296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen Y, Liu L, Luo Y, et al. Effects of Aspirin and Intrauterine Balloon on Endometrial Repair and Reproductive Prognosis in Patients with Severe Intrauterine Adhesion: A Prospective Cohort Study. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:8526104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sugimoto O. Diagnostic and therapeutic hysteroscopy for traumatic intrauterine adhesions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978;131:539-47. 10.1016/0002-9378(78)90116-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gan L, Duan H, Xu Q, et al. Human amniotic mesenchymal stromal cell transplantation improves endometrial regeneration in rodent models of intrauterine adhesions. Cytotherapy 2017;19:603-16. 10.1016/j.jcyt.2017.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hooker AB, Lemmers M, Thurkow AL, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of intrauterine adhesions after miscarriage: prevalence, risk factors and long-term reproductive outcome. Hum Reprod Update 2014;20:262-78. 10.1093/humupd/dmt045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jones BP, Saso S, L'Heveder A, et al. The vaginal microbiome in uterine transplantation. BJOG 2020;127:230-8. 10.1111/1471-0528.15881 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kenyon C, Colebunders R, Crucitti T. The global epidemiology of bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:505-23. 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ma H, Shi X, Fu Z, Wu X, Huangfu Y, Xu P, Zeng X, Xu J, Ruan H, Xu Q. Potential roles of microRNA in levonorgestrel-treated uterine leiomyoma cells. Transl Cancer Res 2018;7:1376-83. 10.21037/tcr.2018.10.16 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hay PE, Lamont RF, Taylor-Robinson D, et al. Abnormal bacterial colonisation of the genital tract and subsequent preterm delivery and late miscarriage. BMJ 1994;308:295-8. 10.1136/bmj.308.6924.295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Elovitz MA, Gajer P, Riis V, et al. Cervicovaginal microbiota and local immune response modulate the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Nat Commun 2019;10:1305. 10.1038/s41467-019-09285-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Placek K, Schultze JL, Aschenbrenner AC. Epigenetic reprogramming of immune cells in injury, repair, and resolution. J Clin Invest 2019;129:2994-3005. 10.1172/JCI124619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lin XN, Zhou F, Wei ML, et al. Randomized, controlled trial comparing the efficacy of intrauterine balloon and intrauterine contraceptive device in the prevention of adhesion reformation after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. Fertil Steril 2015;104:235-40. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yu D, Wong YM, Cheong Y, et al. Asherman syndrome--one century later. Fertil Steril 2008;89:759-79. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yu D, Li TC, Xia E, et al. Factors affecting reproductive outcome of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for Asherman's syndrome. Fertil Steril 2008;89:715-22. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.March CM. Asherman's syndrome. Semin Reprod Med 2011;29:83-94. 10.1055/s-0031-1272470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Laganà AS, Garzon S, Franchi M, Casarin J, Gullo G, Ghezzi F. Translational animal models for endometriosis research: a long and windy road. Ann Transl Med 2018;6:431. 10.21037/atm.2018.08.24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Taskin O, Sadik S, Onoglu A, et al. Role of endometrial suppression on the frequency of intrauterine adhesions after resectoscopic surgery. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2000;7:351-4. 10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60478-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pabuccu R, Onalan G, Kaya C, et al. Efficiency and pregnancy outcome of serial intrauterine device-guided hysteroscopic adhesiolysis of intrauterine synechiae. Fertil Steril 2008;90:1973-7. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Deans R, Abbott J. Review of intrauterine adhesions. J Minim Invasive Gynecol;17:555-69. 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.04.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Witkin SS, Linhares IM. Why do lactobacilli dominate the human vaginal microbiota? BJOG 2017;124:606-11. 10.1111/1471-0528.14390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Younes JA, Lievens E, Hummelen R, et al. Women and Their Microbes: The Unexpected Friendship. Trends Microbiol 2018;26:16-32. 10.1016/j.tim.2017.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nasioudis D, Linhares IM, Ledger WJ, et al. Bacterial vaginosis: a critical analysis of current knowledge. BJOG 2017;124:61-9. 10.1111/1471-0528.14209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Moreno I, Codoñer FM, Vilella F, et al. Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;215:684-703. 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Champer M, Wong AM, Champer J, et al. The role of the vaginal microbiome in gynaecological cancer. BJOG 2018;125:309-15. 10.1111/1471-0528.14631 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jenmalm MC. The mother-offspring dyad: microbial transmission, immune interactions and allergy development. J Intern Med 2017;282:484-95. 10.1111/joim.12652 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Blaser MJ, Dominguez-Bello MG. The Human Microbiome before Birth. Cell Host Microbe 2016;20:558-60. 10.1016/j.chom.2016.10.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cash HL, Whitham CV, Behrendt CL, et al. Symbiotic bacteria direct expression of an intestinal bactericidal lectin. Science 2006;313:1126-30. 10.1126/science.1127119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dethlefsen L, McFall-Ngai M, Relman DA. An ecological and evolutionary perspective on human-microbe mutualism and disease. Nature 2007;449:811-8. 10.1038/nature06245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ley RE, Peterson DA, Gordon JI. Ecological and evolutionary forces shaping microbial diversity in the human intestine. Cell 2006;124:837-48. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ley RE, Turnbaugh PJ, Klein S, et al. Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature 2006;444:1022-3. 10.1038/4441022a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mazmanian SK, Liu CH, Tzianabos AO, et al. An immunomodulatory molecule of symbiotic bacteria directs maturation of the host immune system. Cell 2005;122:107-18. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, et al. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 2006;444:1027-31. 10.1038/nature05414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Peterson J, Garges S, Giovanni M, et al. The NIH Human Microbiome Project. Genome Res 2009;19:2317-23. 10.1101/gr.096651.109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Donders GG, Bosmans E, Dekeersmaecker A, et al. Pathogenesis of abnormal vaginal bacterial flora. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:872-8. 10.1016/S0002-9378(00)70338-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Watts DH, Fazzari M, Fazarri M, et al. Effects of bacterial vaginosis and other genital infections on the natural history of human papillomavirus infection in HIV-1-infected and high-risk HIV-1-uninfected women. J Infect Dis 2005;191:1129-39. 10.1086/427777 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wiesenfeld HC, Hillier SL, Krohn MA, et al. Bacterial vaginosis is a strong predictor of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:663-8. 10.1086/367658 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lai SK, Hida K, Shukair S, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 is trapped by acidic but not by neutralized human cervicovaginal mucus. J Virol 2009;83:11196-200. 10.1128/JVI.01899-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Boskey ER, Telsch KM, Whaley KJ, et al. Acid production by vaginal flora in vitro is consistent with the rate and extent of vaginal acidification. Infect Immun 1999;67:5170-5. 10.1128/IAI.67.10.5170-5175.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhou X, Bent SJ, Schneider MG, et al. Characterization of vaginal microbial communities in adult healthy women using cultivation-independent methods. Microbiology (Reading, Engl) 2004;150:2565-73. 10.1099/mic.0.26905-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ma B, Forney LJ, Ravel J. Vaginal microbiome: rethinking health and disease. Annu Rev Microbiol 2012;66:371-89. 10.1146/annurev-micro-092611-150157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gieseck RL, Wilson MS, Wynn TA. Type 2 immunity in tissue repair and fibrosis. Nat Rev Immunol 2018;18:62-76. 10.1038/nri.2017.90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fielding CA, Jones GW, McLoughlin RM, et al. Interleukin-6 signaling drives fibrosis in unresolved inflammation. Immunity 2014;40:40-50. 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.O'Reilly S, Ciechomska M, Cant R, et al. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) trans signaling drives a STAT3-dependent pathway that leads to hyperactive transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling promoting SMAD3 activation and fibrosis via Gremlin protein. J Biol Chem 2014;289:9952-60. 10.1074/jbc.M113.545822 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhang W, Wang W, Yu H, et al. Interleukin 6 underlies angiotensin II-induced hypertension and chronic renal damage. Hypertension 2012;59:136-44. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.173328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Le TT, Karmouty-Quintana H, Melicoff E, et al. Blockade of IL-6 Trans signaling attenuates pulmonary fibrosis. J Immunol 2014;193:3755-68. 10.4049/jimmunol.1302470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pedroza M, Schneider DJ, Karmouty-Quintana H, et al. Interleukin-6 contributes to inflammation and remodeling in a model of adenosine mediated lung injury. PLoS ONE 2011;6:e22667. 10.1371/journal.pone.0022667 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.González GE, Rhaleb NE, D'Ambrosio MA, et al. Deletion of interleukin-6 prevents cardiac inflammation, fibrosis and dysfunction without affecting blood pressure in angiotensin II-high salt-induced hypertension. J Hypertens 2015;33:144-52. 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhang Y, Wang JH, Zhang YY, et al. Deletion of interleukin-6 alleviated interstitial fibrosis in streptozotocin-induced diabetic cardiomyopathy of mice through affecting TGFβ1 and miR-29 pathways. Sci Rep 2016;6:23010. 10.1038/srep23010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cui W, Zhang H, Liu ZL. Interleukin-6 receptor blockade suppresses subretinal fibrosis in a mouse model. Int J Ophthalmol 2014;7:194-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Translational Medicine are provided here courtesy of AME Publications

RESOURCES