Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mycopathologia. 2019 Oct 1;185(1):87–101. doi: 10.1007/s11046-019-00390-3

She loves me, she loves me not: On the dualistic asexual/sexual nature of dermatophyte fungi

Banu Metin 1, Joseph Heitman 2
PMCID: PMC7050418  NIHMSID: NIHMS1555864  PMID: 31578669

Abstract

Dermatophytes are ascomycetous fungi whose sexuality is greatly influenced by their ecology. Sexual reproduction is ubiquitous among soil-related geophiles and some animal-associated zoophiles. In contrast, anthropophiles are generally present as a single mating type in the population and appear to reproduce asexually. In this article, the current knowledge on the sexuality of dermatophytes including reproduction modes, mating conditions, mating type distributions and the mating type (MAT) locus is presented in the context of revised taxonomy and discussed from an evolutionary perspective.

Keywords: Dermatophytes, sexual reproduction, mating, mating type (MAT) locus

Introduction

Although costly, sexual reproduction is widespread throughout eukaryotes possible because of its counterbalancing benefits such as the selection of beneficial mutations from a deleterious background and accelerating adaptation in response to changing conditions [1, 2]. Asexuality might provide short-term advantages based on well-adapted genomic configurations, but due to the lack of a mechanism providing adaptation and because of the accumulation of deleterious mutations, asexual species are at an increased risk of extinction. Therefore, the few examples that appear to be asexual have been referred to as evolutionary scandals [3, 4].

Sexual reproduction is pervasive in the fungal kingdom, but approximately 20% of fungi have been referred to as asexual because they do not have a known sexual cycle [5]. Recent molecular evidence brings into question whether these species are indeed asexual based on the presence of mating- and meiosis-related genes in the genomes of these presumed “asexual fungi”. In fact, direct or indirect evidence of sexual cycles has been discovered for many of these species. One of the most notable is Candida albicans, in which a parasexual cycle was identified involving the fusion of 2 diploid cells to produce a tetraploid cell, which morphs into a diploid/aneuploid state via concerted chromosome loss [6, 7]. Another example is Aspergillus fumigatus, a species that has long been regarded as asexual. A. fumigatus forms cleistothecia (fruiting bodies) on oatmeal agar after extended incubation time for up to 6 months [8]. The discovery of sexual reproduction in several other Aspergillus and Penicillium species followed these findings [5, 9].

Sexual reproduction in the Pezizomycotina subphylum of Ascomycota is governed by a single mating type (MAT) locus [10,11]. There are 2 alleles of the MAT locus, termed idiomorphs, that are completely different in sequence and harbor key transcription factor genes [12]. One of the idiomorphs, MAT1–1, codes for an alpha domain transcription factor, while the other, MAT1–2, encodes a high mobility group (HMG) transcription factor. In heterothallic species, isolates harboring different idiomorphs are mating partners, while homothallic species bear both idiomorphs (linked or unlinked) in their genome, permitting self-fertility. However, there are also self-fertile species harboring only a single MAT idiomorph in their genome [13, 14]. This special type of homothallism is called unisexual reproduction, and has been observed in a number of species including the pathogens Cryptococcus neoformans and C. albicans, as well as in certain species of Neurospora, Stemphylium, and Huntiella [1519].

Dermatophytes belong to the family of Arthrodermataceae in Onygenales, an order that contains several pathogenic filamentous fungi [20]. Dermatophytes are keratinolytic fungi that live as saprobes in soil containing keratinaceous debris or as commensals on the hairy skin of animals, but these species can also cause infections in both humans and in animals [21]. They are classified into 3 groups based on their habitats: the soil-related geophiles, animal-associated zoophilic organisms, and human-associated anthropophiles [22]. Sexual reproduction is common in geophilic species and in zoophiles related to animals closely associated with soil [23]. Therefore, it has been hypothesized that the niche in which the sexual reproduction of dermatophytes occurs in nature is soil with keratin sources [24]. On the other hand, non-soil-associated dermatophytes, such as anthropophiles and some zoophiles, seem to have lost the ability to sexually reproduce [24, 25]. In addition, some of the anthropophiles such as T. rubrum and T. interdigitale appear to be present as a single mating type in the population [23, 2629]. However, recent genomic evidence shows that these species have the necessary mating- and meiosis-related genes in their genome compared to their sexually reproducing relatives [30, 31].

Sexual reproduction of dermatophytes can be observed in the laboratory by using a variety of media. The most common and oldest of these is hair and soil plates [3234] resembling the niche of geophiles. Other media, such as DCM agar with powdered hair, dextrose agar with powdered hair [35], 2.5 % malt extract agar [36], oatmeal salts agar [37], diluted Saboraud dextrose agar with salts [38, 39], diluted Pablum cereal agar with salts [39], and niger seeds salt agar with yeast extract [40] have also successfully been used for different species as detailed later in the text. Because most sexually reproducing dermatophyte species are heterothallic, compatible mating partners, (+) and (−), or A and a, are inoculated on these media a couple of mm’s apart [35, 36] and incubated mostly at room temperature to see the fruiting bodies [35]. These structures are called gymnothecia or cleistothecia bearing asci and ascospores enclosed by an interwoven network of peridial hyphae [36, 41]. Even the single mating type having species, for which sexual reproduction has not been seen, have been observed to demonstrate a positive response when co-cultured with compatible mating type isolates of tester strains of Trichophyton simii [26]. Before the molecular era, the “Stockdale test” had been very helpful in indicating the mating type of non-mating species.

The MAT locus structure is very similar among dermatophytes (Figure 1) [23]. For the dermatophytes where both mating type sequences are available, such as T. benhamiae and N. gypsea, the MAT locus boundaries can be determined [42, 43]. In addition to harboring the key transcription factor gene (MAT1–1-1 or MAT1–2-1), the MAT locus extends to include the 3’ end of the MAT1–1-4 gene on the right and the 5’ end of a gene coding for a hypothetical protein (HYP1) on the left. In other Pezizomycotina members, generally, SLA2 is located on the left of the MAT locus and APN2 and COX13 are located on the right [44]; however, all three genes are linked to the right hand side of the MAT locus in dermatophytes.

Fig 1.

Fig 1.

The archetypal MAT locus structure of dermatophytes. The isolates harboring the MAT1–1 locus are T. benhamiae CBS809.72 (GQ996965.1), T. rubrum CBS118892 (NW_003456427.1), T. tonsurans CBS112818 (GG698488.1), M. canis CBS113480 (DS995708.1), and N. gypsea CBS118893 (FJ798794.1). The MAT1–2 locus bearing isolates are T. benhamiae strain 2354 (ABSU01000008.1), T. equinum CBS127.97 (DS995742.1), T. verrucosum HKI 0517 (NW_003315532.1), T. megninii CBS735.88 (KK210299.1), T. interdigitale MR816 (AOKY01000593.1), and N. gypsea ATCC48982 (the available sequence (FJ798798.1) harbors SLA2, COX13, APN2, MAT1–1-4, MAT1–2-1, and HYP1). The dashed line indicates the limits of the MAT locus for T. benhamiae.

In this review, we discuss the current knowledge on dermatophyte reproductive strategies, mating conditions, MAT loci and mating types based on the revised taxonomy, which defines the dermatophytes into 9 genera: Guarromyces, Ctenomyces, Arthroderma, Lophophyton, Microsporum, Epidermophyton, Paraphyton, Nannizzia, and Trichophyton [20].

The genera Guarromyces, Ctenomyces and Arthoderma

Guarromyces and Ctenomyces are basal genera of dermatophytes [20] (Table 1). Guarromyces was defined recently in the new taxonomy and is represented by one species, Guarromyces ceretanicus with the older name Keratinomyces ceretanicus, which is a soil fungus with no known sexual cycle [20, 45]. In the genus Ctenomyces, several species have been described. Ctenomyces serratus is the type species and is associated with soil and feathers [46]. It is the only species of Ctenomyces described with a sexual cycle. The ascomata of C. serratus, which can be observed on hair and soil plates, oatmeal salts agar (Medium E), and diluted Pablum cereal agar with added salts, are clearly different from that of the rest of the dermatophytes with distinct ctenoid appendages that resemble the teeth of a comb with tiny projections [46, 47]. The sexual cycle observed is heterothallic [48]. In a study analyzing the mating behavior of C. serratus, of the nineteen isolates analyzed, seven were found to be (−) and eleven were of (+) mating type, while one isolate was sterile with the isolates tested [47]. Four new Ctenomyces species, C. indicus, C. albus, C. obovatus, C. peltricolor, isolated from soil have recently been described [49, 50]. In addition, Ctenomyces vellereus, previously proposed to be a synonym of C. serratus [51, 52], was suggested to be a separate species in these studies.

Table 1.

Host preferences and mating characteristics of the species of the genera Guarromyces, Ctenomyces and Arthroderma

Genera Species Host Mating References
Guarromyces G. ceretanicus Geophilic? ? [20, 45]
Ctenomyces C. serratus Geophilic? Heterothallic [4648]
C. vellereus ? ? [4952]
C. indicus ? ? [49]
C. albus ? ? [50]
C. obovatus ? ? [50]
C. peltricolor ? ? [50]
Arthroderma A. amazonicum Zoophilic Heterothallic [54, 68]
A. ciferrii Geophilic Homothallic [54, 55]
A. cuniculi Geophilic Heterothallic [57]
A. curreyi Geophilic Homothallic [53, 56]
A. chiloniense ? ? [76]
A. eboreum Zoophilic Heterothallic [63]
A. flavescens Zoophilic Heterothallic [54, 66]
A. gertleri Geophilic Heterothallic [54, 77]
A. gloriae Geophilic Heterothallic [58]
A. insingulare Geophilic Heterothallic [54, 59]
A. lenticulare Geophilic Heterothallic [54, 74]
A. melis Geophilic Heterothallic [62]
A. multifidum Geophilic Heterothallic [57]
A. onychocola ? Heterothallic [73]
A. phaseoliforme Geophilic ? [61]
A. redellii Zoophilic ? [67]
A. silverae ? ? [70]
A. thuringiensis Zoophilic? ? [7173]
A. quadrifidum Geophilic Heterothallic [34, 54]
A. tuberculatum Zoophilic Heterothallic [64, 65]
A. uncinatum Geophilic Heterothallic [34, 54]
A. vespertilii Zoophilic ? [69]

According to the new taxonomic scheme, the previous teleomorphic genus name Arthroderma was accepted as the genus name of the species of dermatophytes harboring mostly geophilic and sexually reproducing species [20]. The genus Arthroderma comprises 22 species, 16 of which have the ability to reproduce sexually (Table 1). Most of these species have heterothallic sexual cycles; the only exceptions are A. ciferrii and A. curreyi, which have been described as homothallic [23, 5356].

Arthroderma species have mainly been isolated from decaying feathers in soil near burrows or from animal fur. For example, A. cuniculi and A. multifidum were isolated from the soil of rabbit burrows and from apparently normal live rabbits [57]. Other studies reported A. gloriae, A. uncinatum, A. phaseoliforme, and A. insingulare from soil samples [5861], A. ciferrii from the soil of hog pens [55], A. melis from badger burrows [62], A. eboreum from the soil of badger and rabbit burrows [63], A. tuberculatum from bird-related environments such as the feathers of a robin and from an owl pellet and soil [64, 65], A. flavescens from birds [66], A. amazonicum and A. redellii from rats [67, 68], A. vespertilii from bats [69], A. silverae from arctic fox dung from arctic regions [70], and A. thuringiensis from small mammals and once from a human [71, 72].

Sexual reproduction is common in Arthroderma and can be induced using a variety of media, such as oatmeal agar, water agar, Takashio medium with hair [73], hair and soil plates [55, 5760, 63, 68, 74], and oatmeal salts agar (Medium E) [37, 65, 75]. Only A. onychocola requires special conditions: low temperature (17°C, instead of 25°C) for gymnothecia formation [73]. Ascomata are similar between the Arthroderma species and are called gymnothecia. Gymnothecia have with peridial walls formed by a network of interwoven hyphae composed of dumbbell-shaped cells, sometimes terminating with spiral appendages [68].

The structure of the MAT locus of Arthroderma species is not yet known. The only molecular study involved PCR amplification of MAT1–2 from single isolates of A. onychocola and A. thuringiensis, a species with no known sexual cycle [73].

The genera Lophophyton, Microsporum, Paraphyton, Epidermophyton, and Nannizzia

Lophophyton

Lophophyton gallinae is the only species of the Lophophyton genus [20]. It is a zoophilic species that has been isolated from a squirrel, a dog, a cat, humans, and soil (Table 2) [7881]. The sexual cycle of L. gallinae is heterothallic and was observed on hair and soil plates, oatmeal salts agar, diluted Sabouraud dextrose agar with salts, and diluted Pablum cereal agar with salts [39, 78]. The ascomata resemble those of the Arthroderma, with interwoven, branched, septate peridial hyphae and spiral appendages; however, the peridial cells have been described to be only gradually constricted at the center as opposed to the dumbbell-shaped cells of Arthroderma [78]. The MAT locus of L. gallinae has not been described, yet.

Table 2.

Sexual reproductive patterns and host characteristics of the genera Lophophyton, Microsporum, Paraphyton, Epidermophyton, and Nannizzia

Genera Species Host Mating MAT idiomorph References
Epidermophyton E. flocossum Anthropophilic ? ? [26, 93]
Nannizzia N. aenigmatum ? ? MAT1–2 (single isolate) [73, 107]
N. corniculata Geophilic Heterothallic Not determined [99]
N. duboisii ? ? ? [20]
N. fulva Geophilic Heterothallic MAT1–1 and MAT1–2 [94, 98]
N. gypsea Geophilic Heterothallic MAT1–1 and MAT1–2 [43, 94]
N. incurvata Geophilic Heterothallic MAT1–1 and MAT1–2 [41, 43]
N. nana Zoophilic Heterothallic Not determined [34]
N. perplicata ? ? ? [108]
N. persicolor Zoophilic Heterothallic Not determined [101]
N. praecox Geophilic? ? ? [109111]
Paraphyton P. cookei Geophilic Heterothallic ? [89, 90]
P. cookiellum Geophilic Heterothallic ? [88]
P. mirabile Zoophilic Heterothallic ? [92]
Lophophyton L. gallinae Zoophilic Heterothallic ? [78, 79]
Microsporum M. canis Zoophilic Heterothallic Predominantly MAT1–1 [40, 84, 85]
M. audouinii Anthropophilic ? MAT1–2 [87]
M. ferrugineum Anthropophilic ? MAT1–2 [87]

Microsporum

The Microsporum clade consists of 3 species: M. canis, which is zoophilic, and the anthropophilic species, M audouinii and M. ferrugineum. Among these, only M. canis has a heterothallic sexual cycle that can be observed on hair and soil plates, oatmeal salts agar, and Niger seed salts agar with yeast extract (Table 2) [40, 82, 83]. Ascomata of M. canis consist of septate, echinulate (spiny), and usually curved peridial hyphae harboring dumbbell-shaped outer cells and spiral appendages [64]. However, almost all M. canis isolates are the (−) mating type [40, 84]. A total of 12 (+) mating type isolates, all from Japan, have been reported [40, 82, 83, 85]. The (+) and (−) mating type isolates currently used in phylogenetic studies, CBS495.96 (VUT-77054) and CBS496.86 (VUT-77055), respectively, are monoascospore cultures obtained from a cross of the strains VUT-73015 (+) and VUT-74001 (−), which were isolated from feline ringworm in Japan [20, 40, 82, 86]. The availability of the genome sequence of the clinical isolate CBS113480 has allowed characterization of the M. canis MAT locus, which is quite similar among the dermatophytes (Figure 1). Based on the genomic sequence, the commonly observed (−) mating type is MAT1–1 [23, 30, 43]. Recently, sequencing of the MAT PCR amplicons from the two monoascospore strains indicated that CBS496.86 (−) and CBS495,96 (+) harbor the MAT1–1 and the MAT1–2 idiomorphs, respectively [87]. Additionally, M audouinii 8 isolates and 26 M. ferrugineum isolates harbor the MAT1–2 idiomorph (Table 2) [87]. Interestingly, CBS495.96, the only (+) mating type (MAT1–2) M. canis isolate analyzed, is phylogenetically more closely related to M. audouinii than to M. canis [20, 86]. Analysis of the other (+) mating type isolates from Japan would be informative to study the phylogeny of these three species. It would also be interesting to cross a super-mater M. canis isolate (MAT1–1) with M. ferrugineum and M. audouinii (MAT1–2) in the search for a successful cross.

Paraphyton

The genus Paraphyton consists of 3 species: P. cookei, P. cookiella, and P. mirabile [20]. P. cookei and P. cookiella are geophilic species that have mainly been isolated from soil, but P. cookei also has been isolated from wild animals, dogs, sheep, rats, and humans [8891]. P. mirabile has been isolated from a dog, an alpine chamois, and a human and is thought to be zoophilic [92]. All 3 species are heterothallic and reproduce sexually resulting in ascomata composed of interwoven, branched, peridial hyphae (Table 2) [88, 89, 92]. Sexual reproduction was observed on hair and soil plates and oatmeal salts agar for P. cookei [39, 89, 90], Niger seed salts agar for P. cookiella [88], and Niger seeds agar for P. mirabile [92]. Interspecies mating assays, such as P. mirabile x P. cookiella and P. mirabile x P. cookei crosses, result in pseudoascomatal structures either without asci or without ascospores [92]. These findings indicate that Paraphyton species are phylogenetically close enough to stimulate the sexual reproduction pathways but, too distant to result in viable recombinant ascospores. Molecular studies have not been performed on Paraphyton species; therefore, their MAT locus structures are not known.

Epidermophyton

Epidermophyton flocossum, the only species of the genus Epidermophyton, is an anthropophile (Table 2) [20]. Although spiral hyphae that might represent degenerate peridial hyphae have been observed for certain isolates [93], a sexual cycle has not been described. E. floccosum isolates do not respond to A. simii tester strains, which is a useful method to determine the mating type of some dermatophytes [26]. Because its MAT locus has not been described and because the genome sequence is not known yet, the mating type of the isolates remains to be determined.

Nannizzia

Nannizzia harbors 4 geophilic and 2 zoophilic species with heterothallic sexual cycles and 4 species with unknown hosts and undefined sexual cycles (Table 2). Among the geophilic species, N. incurvata, N. gypsea, and N. fulva are commonly observed and cause occasional infections in humans and animals [94]. The heterothallic sexual reproduction of N. incurvata and N. gypsea can readily be observed on hair and soil plates, oatmeal salts agar, diluted Pablum cereal agar with salts, DCM agar with powdered hair, and dextrose agar with powdered hair [35, 37, 39, 94]. However, N. fulva forms ascomata poorly on oatmeal salts agar or on diluted Pablum cereal agar with salts [37, 39]. In addition, sterilization of the soil by autoclaving reduces the efficiency of ascomata formation suggesting either heat labile components or other viable microbes that contribute to stimulate mating [94]. The ascomata of Nannizzia species are similar to Lophophyton and Arthroderma, but the peridial cells are not as constricted in the dumbbell-shaped cells, and instead showing only a slight central constriction [94]. Spiral appendages are also observed. The mating type distribution of N. incurvata, N. gypsea, and N. fulva was determined to be nearly equal [94, 9597]. Among Nannizzia species, only the MAT locus of N. gypsea has been characterized and was shown to have the typical dermatophyte MAT locus structure (Figure 1) [43]. Other molecular studies have included the amplification of MAT1–1 and MAT1–2 sequences from N. incurvata [43] and N. fulva [98]. For N. corniculata (the other geophilic species), sexual reproduction was observed between soil-derived strains, one isolated in Somalia and the other in Guinea. The species was determined to be heterothallic after ascospore mating analysis, with ascomata production on Niger salts agar and Sabouraud 1/10 with salts agar [99].

Among the zoophilic species, N. persicolor has been isolated from soil, small mammals (especially rodents), and occasionally human infections [100104]. Sexual reproduction was observed on hair and soil plates and determined to be heterothallic [101]. Interestingly, oatmeal salts agar was not successful for the induction of ascomata production [39]. N. nana is the other zoophilic species and is generally associated with pigs [105], but sometimes is observed in humans as well [106]. A sexual cycle is challenging to observe, ascomata are not formed on hair and soil plates or on oatmeal salts agar [39], but could be induced on unsterilized soil with hair after a long incubation period (10–12 weeks) [34]. Mating assays with single ascospore isolates indicate that N. nana is heterothallic [34].

Four Nannizzia species have no known sexual reproduction: N. aenigmaticum, of which only a single human isolate has been reported [107], N. perplicata, a recently described species isolated from a human tinea corporis case[108], N. duboisii [20], and N. praecox, which is likely a geophilic species and has been isolated from soil, horse hair, and humans in contact with horses [109111].

The genus Trichophyton

The Trichophyton genus contains the highest number of anthropophilic species of the dermatophytes. Sixteen defined Trichophyton species are recognized in 5 different series: T. mentagrophytes, T. simii, T. benhamiae, T. bullosum, and the T. rubrum complex (Table 3) [20].

Table 3.

Trichophyton species: Host preferences, reproductive patterns and mating types

Series Species Host Mating Mating type References
T. mentagrophytes T. tonsurans Anthropophilic ? MAT1–1 [30, 87, 95, 128, 129]
T. equinum Zoophilic ? MAT1–2 [26, 30, 87]
T. interdigitale Anthropophilic ? MAT1–2 [28, 29, 112]
T. mentagrophytes Zoophilic Heterothallic MAT1–1 and MAT1–2 [116]
T. simii T. schoenleinii Anthropophilic ? MAT1–2 [87]
T. simii Zoophilic Heterothallic MAT1–1 and MAT1–2 [36, 134]
T. quinckeanum Zoophilic Heterothallic MAT1–1 only? A and a? [87, 136]
T. benhamiae T. benhamiae Zoophilic Heterothallic MAT1–1 and MAT1–2 [87, 117, 139, 143147]
T. concentricum Anthropophilic ? MAT1–1 [87]
T. erinacei Zoophilic Heterothallic MAT1–2 (detected in four isolates) (+/A) and (−/a) [26, 87, 148, 151, 152]
T. verrucosum Zoophilic ? MAT1–2 [42, 87, 153]
T. eriotrephon Anthropophilic? ? MAT1–1 (a single isolate was studied) [87]
T. bullosum T. bullosum Zoophilic ? MAT1–1 (a single isolate was studied) [87, 156, 157]
T. rubrum T. rubrum Anthropophilic ? MAT1–1 [26, 27, 31, 43, 56]
Morphotype megninii Anthropophilic ? MAT1–2 [87, 160]
T. soudanense Anthropophilic ? MAT1–1 [87]
T. violaceum Anthropophilic ? MAT1–1 [87]

T. mentagrophytes series

T. mentagrophytes is a zoophilic species isolated from chinchillas, guinea pigs, cats, dogs, mice, horses, and humans [28, 112115]. Ascomata are of the Arthroderma-type with constricted dumbbell-shaped peridial cells [116]. The heterothallic sexual cycle can be observed on Sabouraud 1/10 plus salts [112, 116], Niger seed agar [28], and Takashio medium [95, 117]. Mating type distribution is skewed in favor of the (+) mating type (MAT1–2) (80% to 95%) in different geographical locations, including Japan, India, and Germany [87, 95, 112, 118]. However, one study reported that 30% of 10 Czechoslovakian isolates were the (+) mating type [117].

T. interdigitale had been considered the anthropophilic counterpart of T. mentagrophytes [20, 28], but recent studies identified new genotypes of T. mentagrophytes as the causative agent of dermatophytosis [119122]. Currently 10 ITS genotypes have been defined for T. mentagrophytes (8 genotypes) and T. interdigitale (2 genotypes) [121]. The Indian genotype (VIII) has come to prominence over the past several years due to the highly increased number of cases in India and the resistance of the isolates to treatment [119122]. The genome-wide phylogeny of 20 isolates shows that the Indian isolates form a distinct clade apart from the other T. mentagrophytes and T. interdigitale genotypes [123]. In addition, three of the isolates bear both an HMG and an alpha-box gene in their genomes, while the other seventeen harbor only an HMG gene [123]. The presence of both idiomorphs might be indicative of hybridization events or an incomplete sexual cycle demonstrating the possibility of sexual reproduction, which could be important in spreading antifungal resistance properties [123]. The inflammatory nature of the isolates might be indicative of zoophilic ancestry; however, because zoophilic species are not expected to cause an epidemic like this, the Indian genotype could be in the process of evolving into an anthopophilic species. It would be interesting to test the sexual reproduction potential of these isolates with fertile T. mentagrophytes tester strains. Unlike the Indian genotype VIII, all known T. interdigitale isolates are of the (+) mating type (MAT1–2) [29, 112]. The genome sequence of T. interdigitale also indicates the MAT1–2 locus structure [31]. The 4 Japanase isolates having the (−) mating type reported to be T. interdigitale by Anzawa and colleagues in 2011 with the GenBank accession numbers AB617768 and AB617769 [124] fall into other genotypes of T. mentagrophytes according to the 10-genotype scheme [121]. Therefore, T. mentagrophytes appears to be a mixture of different genotypes/species including T. interdigitale, and the populations of some are composed of only 1 mating type.

The other species in the T. mentagrophytes series are T. equinum and T. tonsurans [20]. While T. tonsurans is an anthropophilic species [125], T. equinum is zoophilic and mainly associated with horses, but it is sometimes observed in humans who interact with horses as well [126, 127]. Mating has not been observed in either species, but their mating types have been studied either by molecular analysis or by confrontation tests [26]. Sixty T. tonsurans isolates from Japan were reported to harbor the MAT1–1 idiomorph implying that they all are of (−) the mating type [128]. A recent study screened 8 isolates of T. tonsurans composed of reference strains and clinical isolates (from Germany and of unknown origin) and found that all were MAT1–1 [87]. The sequenced isolate of T. tonsurans (CBS 112818) also harbors the MAT1–1 idiomorph (Figure 1) [30]. Other studies show that 10 isolates from India [95], as well as 15 isolates from around the world [102 and references therein], all have the (−) mating type. The same study found that 2 isolates from Kenya have the (+) mating type, but questioned the identity of these strains [129]. On the other hand, studies on the mating type of T. equinum are limited. Three reference strains from horses [87], and the sequenced clinical isolate (CBS127.97) [30] harbor the MAT1–2 idiomorph (Figure 1) [(+) mating type]. Additionally, 5 isolates have been determined to be (+) mating type by confrontation assays [26]. Although their host preferences differ significantly, molecular methods have demonstrated surprisingly high similarity between T. tonsurans and T. equinum [30, 129, 130]. While there has been a debate for and against conspecificity of these species [130, 131], mating between T. tonsurans and T. equinum has not been observed.

T. simii series

The T. simii series includes 3 species: T. simii and T. quinckeanum, which are zoophilic, and T. schoenleinii, which is anthropophilic [20]. T. simii has been isolated from monkeys, chickens, a dog, small mammals, humans, and soil [36, 132, 133]. It was reported to have a heterothallic mating system [36, 134] that can be observed on 2.5% malt extract agar, hair (horse) and soil plates, oatmeal agar, and glucose peptone agar, in addition to a variety of other media [36]. Ascomata have been observed to be the Arthroderma type, with interwoven, branched, peridial hyphae with cells constricted in the middle and spiral appendages [36].

The other zoophilic species in this series is T. quinckeanum, which is associated with small rodents and camels, and is sometimes observed in horses, cats, dogs, and humans [135, 136]. Ajello et al. [136] reported the heterothallic sexual reproduction of 2 T. quinckeanum isolates [TQ10 (X804) and TQ13 (X808)] among a total of 17 strains on hair and soil plates. The progeny obtained from this cross successfully mated both with other isolates of T. quinckeanum, as well as with T. benhamiae in a heterothallic mode on oatmeal agar. In this study, 2 of the isolates [TQ5 (X392) and TQ10] were found to be “A” mating type, while 3 were “a” mating type, the other isolates did not mate. Six isolates from this study and 13 new isolates of T. quinckeanum were evaluated in another study [137], involving mating assays with T. simii and T. benhamiae. In this study, all 19 isolates mated with A. benhamiae mating type A, indicating that all evaluated T. quinckeanum isolates were mating type a. In addition, some of the isolates also produced fertile ascomata with T. simii mating type A, but the ascospores had irregularities in germination or maturation resembling interspecific crosses. However, the study by Weitzman and Padhye [137] include the isolate X392 (TQ5), previously found to be the A mating type [136]. The inconsistency might be due to incorrect isolate numbers and requires further clarification. In the previous study [136], a heterothallic sexual cycle was observed with an A/a ratio of 2/3; however, in the later study [137] all isolates were mating type a (inferred idiomorph: MAT1–1). In agreement with the study by Weitzman and Padhye [137], the MAT1–1 idiomorph was detected in the 2 reference and 3 clinical isolates of T. quinckeanum [87]. Additional studies are needed to clarify the sexual reproduction properties of T. quinckeanum.

The only anthropophilic species in the T. simii series is T. schoenleinii, which is mainly involved in scalp infections [138]. The 16 T. schoenleinii isolates that have been analyzed were reported to harbor the MAT1–2 idiomorph [87].

T. benhamiae series

T. benhamiae is a zoophilic species that is generally associated with guinea pigs, but it has been isolated from other animals such as dogs, rabbits, cats, and humans [113, 114, 139141]. Different genotypes/phenotypes have been defined for T. benhamiae, such as the African and American-European races [142], and the yellow and white phenotypes [143]. A recent study defined 4 ITS genotypes; genotype 1 group II (American-European race/yellow phenotype), a related genotype group I (American-European race/white phenotype), genotype 2 (the African race), and genotype 3 (a new genotype defined in the study) [144]. Compatibility is reduced when strains belonging to different genotypes/phenotypes are crossed [142], which might indicate the presence of a complex composed of closely related species. T. benhamiae mating has been observed on soil and hair plates [139], Sabouraud 1/10 with salts [142], and oatmeal salts agar [37] showing ascomata typical of the genus Arthroderma and with a reportedly heterothallic mating system [139]. The mating type distribution differs between genotypes. For example, Symoens and colleagues [143] reported the presence of both mating types, but 12 of the 14 group I (white phenotype) isolates were (+), whereas only (−) isolates were identified in the 13 genotype 1 (yellow phenotype) isolates. Similarly, 10 clinical yellow phenotype isolates of German/Swiss origin were typed as MAT1–1, while white isolates harbored either the MAT1–1 (n=5) or the MAT1–2 (n=8) idiomorph [87]. In other studies, 1 (−)and 40 (+)among 41 Czechoslovakian isolates [117], 7 (−) and 5 (+) among US and Canadian isolates [145], 2 (−) and 5 (+) among Russian isolates [146], and 8 MAT1–1 (−) and 2 MAT1–2 (+) among Japanese isolates [144] were detected. The (−) and (+) mating type isolates were reported to harbor the idiomorphs MAT1–1 and MAT1–2, respectively [147]. The sequenced clinical isolate, strain 2354 (LAU2354) unveiled a MAT1–2 structure and sequencing the MAT locus of its mating partner (CBS 809.72) showed the complete MAT locus of T. benhamiae (Figure 1) [42].

T. erinacei is a zoophilic fungus mainly isolated from hedgehogs and hedgehog nests, but sometimes from humans as well [148150]. Stimulation by T. simii tester strains showed that all 21 isolates of T. erinacei were mating type (+) (inferred idiomorph: MAT1–2) [26]. Similarly, Padhye and Ajello [151] found that, 26 out of 27 T. erinacei isolates mated with the mating type a A. benhamiae tester strain on Pablum cereal with salts agar and on dilute Sabouraud dextrose agar with salts, which indicates that almost all isolates analyzed in this study were mating type A (inferred idiomorph: MAT1–2). On the other hand, Takahashi et al. reported the presence of both mating types of T. erinacei, 12 (+/A) and 6 (-/a), and demonstrated complete fertility of two compatible isolates [152]. Of the 6 (-/a) isolates studied, 5 were from Kenya and 1 was from Japan. Overall, these results indicate that, although infrequent, the (-/a) mating type of T. erinacei is found in nature and the organism is able to reproduce sexually. In addition, T. erinacei mates with the African race of T. benhamiae, but the resulting ascomata are small, with a low number of asci, suggestive of interspecific crossing [152]. A recent study involving T. erinacei indicates the presence of the MAT1–2 idiomorph in the 4 reference strains [87].

T. verrucosum, another zoophilic species in the T. benhamiae series, is mainly implicated in cattle dermatophytosis [20, 125]. Sexual reproduction has not been observed in T. verrucosum. In a study of 4 isolates from the Czech Republic and 18 from Japan, all were found to harbor the MAT1–2 idiomorph [153]. Similarly, 4 reference strains and 3 clinical strains of unknown origin were also found to be MAT1–2 [87]. Genome sequencing of T. verrucosum demonstrated the presence of the whole set of genes necessary for mating and meiosis, similar to T. benhamiae [42]. In addition, the MAT locus of the sequenced strain (which is of clinical origin) appears to have the typical dermatophyte MAT1–2 locus structure (Figure 1).

T. concentricum, an anthropophilic species in the T. benhamiae series has been observed in SouthEast Asia, Central and South America, and the South Pacific islands [20, 154]. The species is not known to reproduce sexually, and the only study focusing on the MAT locus indicated that all 13 analyzed isolates contained the MAT1–1 idiomorph [87].

T. eriotrephon is a species in the T. benhamiae series that is closely related to the zoophilic species T. verrucosum and T. erinacei [20]. Very few clinical isolates of this species have been isolated [141, 155], and the only molecular study revealed the presence of MAT1–1 in the reference strain CBS220.25 [87]. Rarity of clinical cases brings into question the presumed anthropophilic nature of the species, and it might have an as yet unknown habitat.

T. bullosum

T. bullosum is a rare, zoophilic dermatophyte that has been isolated from horses and donkeys and once from a human [156, 157]. No sexual cycle has been described for this species. A MAT1–1 idiomorph sequence was amplified from the only studied isolate (CBS363.35) [87], and the potential for sexual reproduction is unknown in this species [157].

T. rubrum complex

The T. rubrum species complex contains the most commonly observed anthropophilic dermatophyte, T. rubrum [158], and species closely related to it: T. violaceum, which causes scalp infections and T. soudanense [20]. A majority of T. rubrum isolates analyzed were the (−) mating type (inferred mating type by T. simii stimulation assays) and harbor the MAT1–1 idiomorph [26, 27, 31, 43, 56]. Eleven analyzed T. violaceum isolates and 12 analyzed T. soudanense isolates also harbored the MAT1–1 idiomorph [87]. The MAT1–1 locus of T. rubrum has the structure of the archetypal MAT locus of dermatophytes (Figure 1) [43]. T. rubrum was shown to mate with a super-mater isolate of T. simii, producing 1 hybrid progeny on Takashio medium (1/10 Sabouraud plus salts) [159]. In addition, genome analysis showed that T. rubrum has the genes necessary for mating and meiosis [30]. These findings suggest that T. rubrum has the ability to sexually reproduce. The only (+) mating type species in the T. rubrum complex is the morphotype T. megninii [160], which harbors the MAT1-2 idiomorph (Figure 1) [31, 87]. T. megninii was found to be very similar to T. rubrum with the highest-diversity region in the MAT locus [31], suggesting that mating could be possible between the two species. However, mating assays did not result in ascomata production between T. rubrum and T. megninii using Takashio medium or Medium E [31]. However, it is possible that T. rubrum requires other conditions for mating.

Conclusions

Dermatophytes are keratinophilic microorganisms that are associated with soil with keratinaceous materials (geophiles), with animals (zoophiles), or with humans (anthropophiles). Sexual reproduction is common among geophiles and some zoophiles, but has not been observed among the anthropophilic dermatophytes, which are mostly found as a single mating type. In terms of evolutionary concepts, it could be advantageous in the short term for dermatophyte pathogens to proliferate asexually once they have attained the genetic composition that allows successful host invasion. However, in the long term, asexual propogation would not be advantageous based on the Red Queen hypothesis, which necessitates continual adaptation of both the host and the pathogen, [161, 162]. What we know about other fungal pathogens that they somehow reduce their sexual activity and it is hypothesized that this is to avoid disrupting their well-functioning genomic order [163]. For example, the population of C. neoformans largely consists of a single mating type, but this species has retained the ability to sexually reproduce both in a heterothallic manner and through unisexual reproduction. Similarly, C. albicans requires specific conditions to undergo a parasexual cycle both in a heterothallic and unisexual form. Likewise, A. fumigatus requires stringent conditions for mating, and mating is not as ubiquitous as in its saprobic Neosartorya relatives [164]. It may be the case for dermatophytes that restricted mating has led to successful pathogens, but they are expected to retain some form of sexual activity. Sexual reproduction might occur between different mating types infrequently, such as between T. rubrum and T. megninii or between T. tonsurans and T. equinum, under conditions that have not yet been found. Another possibility is that the dermatophytes have developed other mechanisms that have not detected, yet, such as unisexual reproduction, which is observed in two of the three most common fungal pathogens (C. neoformans and C. albicans). Future studies will shed light on these concepts.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval: This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  • 1.Felsenstein J The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics. 1974;78:737–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McDonald MJ, Rice DP, Desai MM. Sex speeds adaptation by altering the dynamics of molecular evolution. Nature. 2016;531:233–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Maynard Smith J Evolution: Contemplating life without sex. Nature. 1986;324:300–1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Judson OP, Normark BB. Ancient asexual scandals. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996;11:41–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dyer PS, Kück U. Sex and the imperfect fungi. Microbiol Spectrum. 2017;5:FUNK-0043–2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hull CM, Raisner RM, Johnson AD. Evidence for mating of the “asexual” yeast Candida albicans in a mammalian host. Science. 2000;289:307–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Magee BB, Magee PT. Induction of mating in Candida albicans by construction of MTLa and MTLα strains. Science. 2000;289:310–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.O’Gorman CM, Fuller HT, Dyer PS. Discovery of a sexual cycle in the opportunistic fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. Nature. 2009;457:471–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dyer PS, O’Gorman CM. A fungal sexual revolution: Aspergillus and Penicillium show the way. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011;14:649–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bennett RJ, Turgeon BG. Fungal sex: The ascomycota. Microbiol Spectrum. 2016;4: FUNK-0005–2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fraser JA, Heitman J. Fungal mating-type loci. Curr Biol. 2003;13:R792–795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Turgeon BG, Yoder OC. Proposed nomenclature for mating type genes of filamentous ascomycetes. Fungal Genet Biol. 2000;31:1–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Feretzaki M, Heitman J. Unisexual reproduction drives evolution of eukaryotic microbial pathogens. PLOS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Roach KC, Feretzaki M, Sun S, Heitman J. Unisexual Reproduction In: Friedmann T, Dunlap JC, Goodwin SF, editors. Advances in Genetics. Academic Press; 2014. p. 255–305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lin X, Hull CM, Heitman J. Sexual reproduction between partners of the same mating type in Cryptococcus neoformans. Nature. 2005;434:1017–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Alby K, Schaefer D, Bennett RJ. Homothallic and heterothallic mating in the opportunistic pathogen Candida albicans. Nature. 2009;460:890–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Inderbitzin P, Harkness J, Turgeon BG, Berbee ML. Lateral transfer of mating system in Stemphylium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:11390–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wilson AM, Godlonton T, van der Nest MA, Wilken PM, Wingfield MJ, Wingfield BD. Unisexual reproduction in Huntiella moniliformis. Fungal Genet Biol. 2015;80:1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nygren K, Strandberg R, Wallberg A, et al. A comprehensive phylogeny of Neurospora reveals a link between reproductive mode and molecular evolution in fungi. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2011;59:649–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.de Hoog GS, Dukik K, Monod M, et al. Toward a novel multilocus phylogenetic taxonomy for the dermatophytes. Mycopathologia. 2017;182:5–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhan P, Dukik K, Li D, et al. Phylogeny of dermatophytes with genomic character evaluation of clinically distinct Trichophyton rubrum and T. violaceum. Stud Mycol. 2018;89:153–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.White TC, Oliver BG, Gräser Y, Henn MR. Generating and testing molecular hypotheses in the dermatophytes. Eukaryot Cell. 2008;7:1238–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Metin B, Heitman J. Sexual reproduction in dermatophytes. Mycopathologia. 2017;182:45–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Summerbell RC. Form and function in the evolution of dermatophytes In: Kushwaha RKS, Guarro J, editors. Biology of Dermatophytes and other Keratinophilic Fungi. Bilbao, Spain: Revista Iberoamericana de Micología; 2000. p. 30–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Summerbell R What is the evolutionary and taxonomic status of asexual lineages in the dermatophytes? Stud Mycol. 2002;47:97–101. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Stockdale PM. Sexual stimulation between Arthroderma simii Stockd., Mackenzie & Austwick and related species. Sabouraudia. 1968;6:176–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kano R, Isizuka M, Hiruma M, Mochizuki T, Kamata H, Hasegawa A. Mating type gene (MAT1–1) in Japanese isolates of Trichophyton rubrum. Mycopathologia. 2013;175:171–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Symoens F, Jousson O, Planard C, et al. Molecular analysis and mating behaviour of the Trichophyton mentagrophytes species complex. Int J Med Microbiol. 2011;301:260–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kano R, Kawasaki M, Mochizuki T, Hiruma M, Hasegawa A. Mating genes of the Trichophyton mentagrophytes complex. Mycopathologia. 2012;173:103–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Martinez DA, Oliver BG, Gräser Y, et al. Comparative genome analysis of Trichophyton rubrum and related dermatophytes reveals candidate genes ınvolved in infection. mBio. 2012;3:e00259–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Persinoti GF, Martinez DA, Li W, et al. Whole Genome analysis illustrates global clonal population structure of the ubiquitous dermatophyte pathogen Trichophyton rubrum. Genetics. 2018;208:1657–1669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Griffin DM. Perfect stage of Microsporum gypseum. Nature. 1960;186:94–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Szathmary S, Herpay Z. Perithecium-formation of Microsporon gypseum and its cognate, Epidermophyton radiosulcatum var. flavum Szathmary 1940 on soil. Mycopathol Mycol Appl. 1960;13:1–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dawson CO, Gentles JC. The perfect states of Keratinomyces ajelloi Vanbreuseghem, Trichophyton terrestre Durie & Frey and Microsporum nanum Fuentes. Sabouraudia. 1961;1:49–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Weitzman I Incompatibility in the Microsporum gypseum complex. Mycologia. 1964;56:425–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Stockdale PM, Mackenzie DWR, Austwick PKC. Arthroderma simii sp. nov., the perfect state of Trichophyton simii (Pinoy) comb. nov. Sabouraudia. 1965;4:112–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Weitzman I, Silva-Hutner M. Non-keratinous agar media as substrates for the ascigerous state in certain members of the Gymnoascaceae pathogenic for man and animals. Sabouraudia. 1967;5:335–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Takashio. Sexual reproduction of some Arthroderma and Nannizzia on diluted Sabouraud agar with or without salts. Mycoses. 1972;15:11–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Padhye AA, Sekhon AS, Carmichael JW. Ascocarp production by Nannizzia and Arthroderma on keratinous and non-keratinous media. Sabouraudia. 1973;11:109–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hironaga M, Nozaki K, Watanabe S. Ascocarp production by Nannizzia otae on keratinous and non-keratinous agar media and mating behavior of N. otae and 123 Japanese isolates of Microsporum canis. Mycopathologia. 1980;72:135–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Stockdale PM. Nannizzia incurvata gen. nov., sp. nov., a perfect state of Microsporum gypseum (Bodin) Guiart et Grigorakis. Sabouraudia. 1962;1:41–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Burmester A, Shelest E, Glöckner G, et al. Comparative and functional genomics provide insights into the pathogenicity of dermatophytic fungi. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Li W, Metin B, White TC, Heitman J. Organization and evolutionary trajectory of the mating type (MAT) locus in dermatophyte and dimorphic fungal pathogens. Eukaryot Cell. 2010;9:46–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Butler G The evolution of MAT: The ascomycetes In: Heitman J, Kronstad JW, Taylor J, Casselton L, editors. Sex in fungi: Molecular determination and evolutionary implications. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2007. p. 3–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Punsola L, Guarro J. Keratinomyces ceretanicus sp. nov., a psychrophilic dermatophyte from soil. Mycopathologia. 1984;85:185–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Orr GF & Kuehn HH The genus Ctenomyces Eidam. Mycopathol Mycol Appl. 1963;21:321–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sekhon AS, Padhye AA. Mating behaviour of Ctenomyces serratus. Mycopathologia. 1976;60:33–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Varsavsky E, Reca ME. Demonstration of heterothallism in Ctenomyces serratus Eidam 1880. Mycopathol Mycol Appl. 1964;24:119–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sharma R, Shouche YS. Diversity of Onygenalean fungi in keratin-rich habitats of Maharashtra (India) and description of three novel taxa. Mycopathologia. 2019. doi: 10.1007/s11046-019-00346-7. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhang Z, Han Y, Chen W, Liang Z. Phylogeny and taxonomy of three new Ctenomyces (Arthrodermataceae, Onygenales) species from China. MycoKeys. 2019;47:1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Guarro J, Punsola L, Cano J. Myceliophthora vellerea (Chrysosporium asperatum) anamorph of Ctenomyces serratus. Mycotaxon. 1985;23:419–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.van den Brink J, Samson RA, Hagen F, Boekhout T, de Vries RP. D Phylogeny of the industrial relevant, thermophilic genera Myceliophthora and Corynascus. Fungal Divers. 2012;52:197–207. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Udagawa S Geographical distribution of the pleomorphic plectomycetes in Asia and their teleomorph-anamorph connections In: Sugiyama J, editor. Pleomorphic fungi: The diversity and its taxonomic implications. Tokyo and Amsterdam: Kodansha LTD and Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.; 1987. p. 9–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Howard DH, Weitzman I, Padhye AA. Onygenales: Arthrodermataceae In: Pathogenic Fungi in Humans and Animals. 2nd edition. NewYork: Marcel Dekker Inc; 2003. p. 141–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Varsavsky E, Ajello L. The perfect and imperfect forms of a new keratinophilic fungus Arthroderma ciferrii sp. nov.: Trichophyton georgii sp. nov. Riv Patol Veg. 1964;4:351–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Takashio M Taxonomy of dermatophytes based on their sexual states. Mycologia. 1979;71:968–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dawson CO. Two new species of Arthroderma isolated from soil from rabbit burrows. Sabouraudia. 1963. January 1;2(3):185–91. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ajello L, Cheng S-LY. A new geophilic Trichophyton. Mycologia. 1967;59:255–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Padhye AA, Carmichael JW. Arthroderma insingulare sp. nov., another Gymnoascaceous state of the Trichophyton terrestre complex. Sabouraudia. 1972;10:47–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Padhye AA, Carmichael JW. Mating reactions of pigmented and non-pigmented isolates of Arthroderma uncinatum. Sabouraudia. 1970;8:112–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Alteraş I, Evolceanu R. Trichophyton phaseoliforme (Dante BoreIIi & Feo – 1966) in Romanian soil. Mycoses. 1969;12:421–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Krivanec K, Janecková V, Otcenásek M. Arthroderma melis spec. nov. - a new dermatophyte species isolated from badger burrows in Czechoslovakia. Ceská Mykol. 1977;31:91–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Campbell CK, Borman AM, Linton CJ, Bridge PD, Johnson EM. Arthroderma olidum, sp. nov. A new addition to the Trichophyton terrestre complex. Med Mycol. 2006;44:451–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kuehn HH. Observations on Gymnoascaceae. VIII. A new species of Arthroderma. Mycopathol Mycol Appl. 1960;13:189–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sekhon AS, Padhye AA, Carmichael JW. Mating reactions in Arthroderma tuberculatum. Sabouraudia. 1973;11:283–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Rees RG. Arthroderma flavescens sp. nov. Sabouraudia. 1967;5:206–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lorch JM, Minnis AM, Meteyer CU, et al. The fungus Trichophyton redellii sp. nov. causes skin infections that resemble white-nose syndrome of hibernating bats. J Wildl Dis. 2015;51:36–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Moraes M, Padhye AA, Ajello L. The perfect state of Microsporum amazonicum. Mycologia. 1975;67:1109–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Vidal P, Guarro J, de Vroey C. Studies on keratinophilic fungi: VII. Chrysosporium vespertilium sp. nov. from Zaire. Mycotaxon. 1996;59:189–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Currah RS, Abbott SP, Sigler L. Arthroderma silverae sp. nov. and Chrysosporium vallenarense, keratinophilic fungi from arctic and montane habitats. Mycol Res. 1996;100:195–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Nenoff P, Winter I, Winter A, et al. Trichophyton thuringiense H.A. Koch 1969. A rare geophilic dermatophyte--now isolated for the first time from man. Hautarzt Z Dermatol Venerol Verwandte Geb. 2014;65:221–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Hoffmann R, Kolipp D, Koch HA. Die Bedeutung von Mäusen und anderen Kleinsäugern für die Verbreitung von Dermatophyten und anderen keratinophilen Pilzen. Mycoses. 1970;13:583–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Hubka V, Nissen CV, Jensen RH, et al. Discovery of a sexual stage in Trichophyton onychocola, a presumed geophilic dermatophyte isolated from toenails of patients with a history of T. rubrum onychomycosis. Med Mycol. 2015;53:798–809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Pore RS, Tsao GC, Plunkett OA. A new species of Arthroderma established according to biological species concepts. Mycologia. 1965;57:969–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Weitzman I, Kozma I, Silva-Hutner M. Some observations on Arthroderma uncinatum. Sabouraudia. 1969;7:216–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Brasch J, Beck-Jendroschek V, Voss K, Yurkov A, Gräser Y. Arthroderma chiloniense sp. nov. isolated from human stratum corneum: Description of a new Arthroderma species. Mycoses. 2019;62:73–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Böhme H Arthroderma gertleri sp. nov., die perfekte form von Trichophyton vanbreuseghemii Rioux, Jarry et Juminer. Mycoses. 1967;10:247–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Georg LK, Ajello L, Friedman L, Brinkman SA. A new species of Microsporum pathogenic to man and animals. Sabouraudia. 1962;1:189–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Morganti L, Padhye AA, Ajello L. Recovery of Nannizzia grubyia from a stray Italian cat (Felis catus). Mycologia. 1975;67:434–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Sethi KK, Randhawa HS, Kurup PV, Ajello L. Isolation of Microsporum vanbreuseghemii from soil in India. Sabouraudia. 1968;6:81–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Naseri A, Fata A, Khosravi AR. Tinea capitis due to Microsporum vanbreuseghemii: Report of two cases. Mycopathologia. 2012;174:77–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hasegawa A, Usui K. Nannizzia otae sp. nov, the perfect state of Microsporum canis Bodin. Jpn J Med Mycol. 1975;16:148–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Takatori K, Hasegawa A. Mating experiment of Microsporum canis and M. equinum isolated from animals with Nannizzia otae. Mycopathologia. 1985;90:59–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Weitzman I, Padhye AA. Mating behaviour of Nannizzia otae (=Microsporum canis). Mycopathologia. 1978;64:17–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kubo H, Iizuka H, Shibaki H. Mating behaviour of Microsporum canis from human ringworm cases in Hokkaido prefecture in Japan. J Dermatol. 1987;14:241–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Kaszubiak A, Klein S, de Hoog GS, Gräser Y. Population structure and evolutionary origins of Microsporum canis, M. ferrugineum and M. audouinii. Infect Genet Evol. 2004;4:179–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kosanke S, Hamann L, Kupsch C, Moreno Garcia S, Chopra A, Gräser Y. Unequal distribution of the mating type (MAT) locus idiomorphs in dermatophyte species. Fungal Genet Biol. 2018;118:45–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.De Clercq D Nannizzia cookiella, a new species of dermatophyte. Mycotaxon. 1983;18:23–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Ajello L The ascigerous state of Microsporum cookei. Sabouraudia. 1962;1:173–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Padhye AA, Carmichael JW. Incompatibility in Microsporum cookei. Sabouraudia. 1971;9:27–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Jeske J, Lupa S, Seneczko F, Głowacka A, Ochęcka-Szymańska A. Epidemiology of dermatomycoses of humans in Central Poland. Part V. Tinea corporis. Mycoses. 1999;42:661–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Choi JS, Gräser Y, Walther G, Peano A, Symoens F, de Hoog S. Microsporum mirabile and its teleomorph Arthroderma mirabile, a new dermatophyte species in the M. cookei clade. Med Mycol. 2012;50:161–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Guého E, Castro I, Badillet G. Existence of ornamentations on macroconidia and hyphae of Epidermophyton floccosum. Ann Inst Pasteur Microbiol. 1985;136:195–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Stockdale PM. The Microsporum gypseum complex (Nannizzia incurvata Stockd., N. gypsea (Nann.) comb. nov., N. fulva sp. nov.). Sabouraudia. 1964;3:114–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Ranganathan S, Balajee SAM, Menon T. Mating patterns of dermatophytes of diverse origin in India. Mycopathologia. 1996;136:91–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Hironaga M, Tanaka S, Watanabe S. Distribution of mating types among clinical isolates of the Microsporum gypseum complex. Mycopathologia. 1982;77:31–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Weitzman I, Gordon MA, Rosenthal SA. Determination of the perfect state, mating type and elastase activity in clinical isolates of the Microsporum gypseum complex. J Invest Dermatol. 1971;57:278–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Fukutomi T, Kano R, Kamata H. First Isolation of Arthroderma fulvum in Japan. Med Mycol J. 2017;58:E115–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Takashio M, de Vroey C. Nannizzia corniculata sp. nov., the perfect state of Microsporum boullardii. Mycotaxon. 1982;14:383–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Padhye AA, Ajello L. Further observations on Nannizzia persicolor (= “N. quinckeani”). Sabouraudia. 1974;12:362–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Stockdale PM. Nannizzia persicolor sp. nov., the perfect state of Trichophyton persicolor Sabouraud. Sabouraudia. 1967;5:355–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Faure-Cognet O, Fricker-Hidalgo H, Pelloux H, Leccia MT. Superficial fungal infections in a french teaching hospital in Grenoble area: Retrospective study on 5470 samples from 2001 to 2011. Mycopathologia. 2016;181:59–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Otcenasek M, Hubalek Z, Sixl W. Survey of dermatophytes in the hair of small mammals from Austria. Folia Parasitol (Praha). 1980;27:83–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Rajak RC, Sharma R, Presber W, Gräser Y. Molecular detection of Microsporum persicolor in soil suggesting widespread dispersal in central India. Med Mycol. 2008;46:67–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Roller JA, Westblom TU. Microsporum nanum infection in hog farmers. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1986;15:935–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Bonifaz A, Córdoba-García B, Simancas-Llanos T, Hernández MA, Martínez-Herrera E, Tirado-Sánchez A. Dermatophytosis caused by Nannizzia nana in two siblings. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2019;36:30–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Hubka V, Dobiáš R, Dobiášová S, Kolařík M. Microsporum aenigmaticum sp. nov. from M. gypseum complex, isolated as a cause of tinea corporis. Med Mycol. 2014;52:387–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Szekely A, Johnson EM, Fraser M, Borman AM, Lovegrove S. A novel dermatophyte relative, Nannizzia perplicata sp. nov., isolated from a case of tinea corporis in the United Kingdom. 2018. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myy099. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 109.Alanio A, Romand S, Penso-Assathiany D, Foulet F, Botterel F. Microsporum praecox: Molecular identification of a new case and review of the literature. Mycopathologia. 2011;171:61–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Uhrlaß S, Mayser P, Schwarz R, Koch D, Krüger C, Korfmann I, et al. Dermatomycoses due to Nannizzia praecox (formerly Microsporum praecox) in Germany: Case reports and review of the literature. Mycopathologia. 2018;183:391–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Weitzman I, McMillen S. Isolation in the United States of a culture resembling M. praecox. Mycopathologia. 1980;70:181–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Hironaga M, Watanabe S. Mating behavior of 334 Japanese isolates of Trichophyton mentagrophytes in relation to their ecological status. Mycologia. 1980;72:1159–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Bartosch T, Frank A, Günther C, et al. Trichophyton benhamiae and T. mentagrophytes target guinea pigs in a mixed small animal stock. Med Mycol Case Rep. 2019;23:37–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Drouot S, Mignon B, Fratti M, Roosje P, Monod M. Pets as the main source of two zoonotic species of the Trichophyton mentagrophytes complex in Switzerland, Arthroderma vanbreuseghemii and Arthroderma benhamiae. Vet Dermatol. 2009;20:13–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Chollet A, Wespi B, Roosje P, Unger L, Venner M, Goepfert C, et al. An outbreak of Arthroderma vanbreuseghemii dermatophytosis at a veterinary school associated with an infected horse. Mycoses. 2015;58:233–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Takashio M Une nouvelle forme sexuée du complexe Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Arthroderma vanbreuseghemii sp. nov. Ann Parasitol Hum Comparée. 1973;48:713–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Hejtmánek M, Hejtmánková N. Hybridization and sexual stimulation in Trichophyton mentagrophytes. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1989;34:77–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Hiruma J, Kano R, Kimura U, et al. Mating type gene for isolates of Trichophyton mentagrophytes from guinea pigs. J Dermatol. 2014;41:743–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Taraskina AE, Vasilyeva NV, Pchelin IM, et al. Species boundaries in the Trichophyton mentagrophytes / T. interdigitale species complex. 2018. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myy115. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 120.Chowdhary A, Singh A, Singh PK, Khurana A, Meis JF. Perspectives on misidentification of Trichophyton interdigitale/Trichophyton mentagrophytes using internal transcribed spacer region sequencing: Urgent need to update the sequence database. Mycoses. 2019;62:11–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Nenoff P, Verma SB, Uhrlaß S, Burmester A, Gräser Y. A clarion call for preventing taxonomical errors of dermatophytes using the example of the novel Trichophyton mentagrophytes genotype VIII uniformly isolated in the Indian epidemic of superficial dermatophytosis. Mycoses. 2019;62:6–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Nenoff P, Verma SB, Vasani R, et al. The current Indian epidemic of superficial dermatophytosis due to Trichophyton mentagrophytes—A molecular study. Mycoses. 2018;62:336–356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Singh A, Masih A, Monroy-Nieto J, et al. A unique multidrug-resistant clonal Trichophyton population distinct from Trichophyton mentagrophytes / Trichophyton interdigitale complex causing an ongoing alarming dermatophytosis outbreak in India: Genomic insights and resistance profile. Fungal Genet Biol. 2019. (submitted) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Anzawa K, Kawasaki M, Hironaga M, Mochizuki T. Genetic relationship between Trichophyton mentagrophytes var. interdigitale and Arthroderma vanbreuseghemii. Med Mycol J. 2011;52:223–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Reiss E, Shadomy HJ, Lyon GM. Dermatophytosis In: Fundamental Medical Mycology (eds Reiss E, Shadomy HJ and Lyon GM). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2012. p. 526–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Georg LK, Kaplan W, Camp LB. Trichophyton equinum—A re-evaluation of its taxonomic status. J Invest Dermatol. 1957;29:27–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Veraldi S, Genovese G, Peano A. Tinea corporis caused by Trichophyton equinum in a rider and review of the literature. Infection. 2018;46:135–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Hiruma J, Okubo M, Kano R, et al. Mating type gene (MAT) and itraconazole susceptibility of Trichophyton tonsurans strains isolated in Japan. Mycopathologia. 2016;181:441–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Hayashi N, Takashio M. Mating type of Trichophyton tonsurans. Mycoses. 1984;27:377–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Gräser Y, Kuijpers AFA, Presber W, De Hoog GS. Molecular taxonomy of Trichophyton mentagrophytes and T. tonsurans. Med Mycol. 1999;37:315–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Woodgyer A The curious adventures of Trichophyton equinum in the realm of molecular biology: A modern fairy tale. Med Mycol. 2004;42:397–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Beguin H, Goens K, Detandt M, Planard C, Stubbe D, Hendrickx M. Is Trichophyton simii endemic to the Indian subcontinent? Med Mycol. 2013;51:444–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Gugnani HC, Shrivastav JB, Gupta NP. Occurrence of Arthroderma simii in soil and on hair of small mammals. Sabouraudia. 1968;6:77–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Kwon-Chung KJ. Genetic study on the incompatibility system in Arthroderma simii. Sabouraudia. 1972;10:74–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Uhrlaß S, Schroedl W, Mehlhorn C, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Trichophyton quinckeanum – a zoophilic dermatophyte on the rise. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2018;16:21–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Ajello L, Bostick L, Cheng S. The relationship of Trichophyton quinckeanum to Trichophyton mentagrophytes. Mycologia. 1968;60:1185–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Weitzman I, Padhye AA. Is Arthroderma simii the perfect state of Trichophyton quinckeanum? Sabouraudia. 1976;14:65–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Ilkit M Favus of the scalp: An overview and update. Mycopathologia. 2010;170:143–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Ajello L, Cheng S. The perfect state of Trichophyton mentagrophytes. Sabouraudia. 1967;5:230–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Sieklucki U, Oh S-H, Hoyer LL. Frequent isolation of Arthroderma benhamiae from dogs with dermatophytosis. Vet Dermatol. 2014;25:39–e14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Forouzanfar F, Candolfi E, Denis J, Letscher-Bru V, Sabou M, Boulanger N, et al. Molecular identification of Trichophyton benhamiae in Strasbourg, France: a 9-year retrospective study. Med Mycol. 2017;56:723–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Takashio M Observations on African and European strains of Arthroderma benhamiae. Int J Dermatol. 1974;13:94–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Symoens F, Jousson O, Packeu A, et al. The dermatophyte species Arthroderma benhamiae, intraspecies variability and mating behaviour. J Med Microbiol. 2013;62:377–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Hiruma J, Kano R, Harada K, et al. Occurrence of Arthroderma benhamiae genotype in Japan. Mycopathologia. 2015;179:219–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Summerbell RC, Weitzman I and Padhye AA. The Trichophyton mentagrophytes complex: Biological species and mating type prevalences of North American isolates, and a review of the worldwide distribution and host associations of species and mating types.. Stud Mycol. 2002;47:75–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Vasilyev OD, Bogomolova TS. Tipy sparivaniya isovershennaya forma shtammov griba Trichophyton mentagrophytes (Robin) Blanchard, vydelennykh ot bol’nikhdermatofitiyami. Mikol Fitopatol. 1985;19:309–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Kano R, Yamada T, Makimura K, et al. Arthroderma benhamiae (the teleomorph of Trichophyton mentagrophytes) mating type-specific genes. Mycopathologia. 2011;171:333–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Smith JMB, Marples MJ. Trichophyton mentagrophytes var. erinacei. Sabouraudia. 1964;3:1–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.English MP, Morris P. Trichophyton mentagrophytes var. erinacei in hedgehog nests. Sabouraudia. 1969;7:118–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Kim J, Tsuchihashi H, Hiruma M, Kano R, Ikeda S. Tinea corporis due to Trichophyton erinacei probably transmitted from a hedgehog. Med Mycol J. 2018;59:E77–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Padhye AA, Ajello L. The taxonomic status of the hedgehog fungus Trichophyton erinacei. Sabouraudia. 1977;15:103–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Takahashi Y, Sano A, Takizawa K, Fukushima K, Miyaji M, Nishimura K. The epidemiology and mating behavior of Arthroderma benhamiae var. erinacei in household four-toed hedgehogs (Atelerix albiventris) in Japan. Nippon Ishinkin Gakkai Zasshi. 2003;44:31–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Kano R, Yoshida E, Yaguchi T, et al. Mating type gene (MAT1–2) of Trichophyton verrucosum. Mycopathologia. 2014;177:87–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Bonifaz A, Archer-Dubon C, Saúl A. Tinea imbricata or Tokelau. Int J Dermatol. 2004;43:506–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Rezaei-Matehkolaei A, Makimura K, de Hoog S, et al. Molecular epidemiology of dermatophytosis in Tehran, Iran, a clinical and microbial survey. Med Mycol. 2013;51:203–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Sitterle E, Fréalle E, Foulet F, Cabaret O, Cremer G, Guillot J, et al. Trichophyton bullosum: a new zoonotic dermatophyte species. Med Mycol. 2012;50:305–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Lyskova P, Hubka V, Petricakova A, Dobias R, Cmokova A, Kolarik M. Equine Dermatophytosis due to Trichophyton bullosum, a poorly known zoophilic dermatophyte masquerading as T. verrucosum. Mycopathologia. 2015;180:407–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Achterman RR, White TC. Dermatophyte virulence factors: identifying and analyzing genes that may contribute to chronic or acute skin infections. Int J Microbiol. 2012;2012:358305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Anzawa K, Kawasaki M, Mochizuki T, Ishizaki H. Successful mating of Trichophyton rubrum with Arthroderma simii. Med Mycol. 2010;48:629–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Sequeira H, Cabrita J, de Vroey C, Wuytack-Raes C. Contribution to our knowledge of Trichophyton megninii. J Med Vet Mycol. 1991;29:417–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Ene IV, Bennett RJ. The cryptic sexual strategies of human fungal pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12:239–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Lively CM. A review of red queen models for the persistence of obligate sexual reproduction. J Hered. 2010;101:S13–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Heitman J Evolution of eukaryotic microbial pathogens via covert sexual reproduction. Cell Host Microbe. 2010;8:86–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Kwon-Chung KJ, Sugui JA. Sexual reproduction in Aspergillus species of medical or economical importance: why so fastidious? Trends Microbiol. 2009;17:481–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES