Abstract
Introduction:
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common pediatric mental health problems but often goes unrecognized. Children with ADHD have an increased risk of injuries. Whether injured children presenting to the emergency department (ED) have an increased frequency of unrecognized ADHD symptoms compared to noninjured children is not known.
Purpose:
Examine the association of medically unrecognized ADHD symptoms in injured compared to noninjured children presenting to a pediatric ED.
Methods:
A prospective age- and sex-matched cross-sectional comparison design of parent reported ADHD symptoms based on the Vanderbilt Assessment Scale in injured and noninjured children ages 5 to 18 years. Families were excluded if ADHD was listed in the medical history by nurses or physicians or if the child was currently taking medications for ADHD. Injured children were matched with noninjured children who presented with medical complaints. Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed. Proportions of children with ADHD symptoms in injured and noninjured children were compared with the χ2 statistic.
Results:
One hundred sixty-four mothers of children were enrolled into the study: 82 in the injured and 82 noninjured group. The frequency of parent reported ADHD symptoms was the same in the 2 groups (9.8%).
Conclusions:
Children presenting with injuries are no more likely than a noninjured age- and sex-matched group to have unrecognized ADHD based on parental screen. Targeting injured children for ADHD screening is not supported by this study.
Keywords: ADHD screening, injury
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a common mental health problem in children affecting between 3% and 12% of all school age children.1 Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder is more common among boys than girls and is most prevalent among whites, followed by African Americans and Hispanics.2 Children with specific temperaments and externalizing behavior problems have been shown to be at increased risk for injury.3–13 Unintentional injury is a leading cause of emergency department (ED) visits for children and adolescents in the United States.14 However, there are little data on the association of unrecognized childhood ADHD in children presenting for injury-related ED visits.
Injuries remain today as the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in children less than 19 years and account for more than a third of all ED visits for US children.14–16 Children with ADHD have a markedly higher rate of less severe injuries in the preschool setting.17 Older children with injury-related hospital admissions are more likely to carry a diagnosis of ADHD,18 however, younger children have a higher rate of injury-related emergency department visits, some of whom may have unrecognized ADHD.19 Although an association of children with ADHD and injury has been documented,20,21 it is not clear whether an injury visit to the emergency department may represent the first medical encounter or sentinel event for a child with previously unrecognized ADHD. The purpose of this study was to examine the association of medically unrecognized ADHD symptoms in children who present to the ED with injuries compared with children presenting for other medical conditions.
METHODS
Design
The study was a prospective age- and sex-matched cross-sectional comparison design that consisted of interviewer-administered questionnaires with parents of children ages 5 to 18 years who presented to a large tertiary pediatric emergency department from June 10, 2004 to August 10, 2004. This study was nested in a larger study examining the prevalence of unrecognized mental health problems in children presenting for care in an emergency department setting.22
Subject Recruitment
A trained research assistant approached mothers of injured and noninjured children for enrollment. Multiple trauma patients and those patients requiring intravenous pain medications were excluded. Patients were approached after initial triage and nursing assessments early in the emergency department encounter. Patients were also excluded if they were non-English speaking (at the time of the study less than 1% of patients were non-English speaking), did not present with their mother, had a history of ADHD indicated on the chart, or were previously enrolled in the study. Fathers were excluded from the study because maternal mental illness was a variable of interest in the larger mental health prevalence study. Injured children who consented and enrolled were age-and sex-matched on a one-to-one basis to the next patient who was within 1 year of age of the injured child and who was presenting to the main area of the ED with a medical diagnosis. Chief complaints of the noninjured comparison group included common medical conditions such as respiratory problems and gastroenteritis. Recruitment of participants occurred in 5 to 6 hour shifts approximately every 4 days across a 2-month enrollment period. All eligible injured patients during a shift were approached for participation.
Participants
Of the 189 mother-child dyads that met eligibility criteria during the study hours, 164 agreed to participate. Twenty-five mothers declined to participate, 15 in the noninjured group and 10 in the injured group. The families who declined to participate were similar to the study population with regard to demographic characteristics.
Classification of ‘‘Medically Recognized’’ ADHD History
In an attempt to exclude children, injured or not, who already carried a diagnosis of ADHD, patient records were prescreened for an established history of ADHD before being approached using the pediatric ED computerized charting system. Families were not directly asked about a history of ADHD by the research assistant before enrollment. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder history was ascertained by nursing triage information, nursing medical histories, or documentation of a current ADHD medication. If any of these were present, the patient was considered to have a “medically recognized ADHD diagnosis” and therefore was not approached for study participation. The Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center Institutional Review Board approved the study.
ADHD Screening
Mothers were consented and enrolled by a research assistant after nursing triage was completed. Mothers were then asked to answer questions related to their child’s behavior using the NICHQ Vanderbilt Assessment Scale: Parent Informant version.23 The Vanderbilt ADHD Parent Rating Scale (VADPRS) has been shown to have valid psychometric properties consistent with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition (DSM-IV ) diagnosis of ADHD in elementary school populations24 and is widely used as a good practical screen for ADHD.23 The scale asks the parent to report on the behavior that has occurred over the last 6 months. In addition, the scale includes questions about problems the child has been experiencing in multiple environments including both school and home. A single parent rater has been used successfully to identify children with ADHD in a nationally representative sample.25
To meet the DSM-IV criteria for the diagnosis, the parent must report at least 6 positive responses to either the inattentive or hyperactive core symptoms, or 6 positive responses in both sections. The second section of the scale has a set of performance measures; this section determines the level of impairment as reported by the parent. Impairment is considered present if the parent reports that the symptoms are “somewhat of a problem” or “problematic” in various social or academic environments. To meet diagnostic criteria for ADHD a parent must report impairment (defined as at least 1 item of the performance measure where the symptoms are “somewhat of a problem” or “problematic”) coupled with symptoms to meet diagnostic criteria. In practice, reports from multiple sources are usually compiled to make a diagnosis of ADHD by the Vanderbilt Scale, whereas in the current study only parent ratings were obtained.
In addition to screening for ADHD inattentive, hyperactive, and combined subtypes, the tool also screened for co-morbidities such as oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), conduct disorder, anxiety, and depression. Demographic information gathered included insurance status, maternal age, maternal education, maternal relationship status, and race.
Statistical Analysis
SPSS software (version 13.0 Chicago, IL) was used for univariate and bivariate analysis of descriptive statistics. The χ2 test and odds ratios (OR) were used to examine the association of ADHD and co-morbidities, injured and un-injured patients and other risk factors. Using an alpha of 0.05 and a power of 0.8 to detect a 15% difference in the positive screening result between the injured and noninjured groups, we estimated that we would need 82 children in each group.
RESULTS
Overall, the mean age of the participating children and their mother’s was 9.9 and 35 years respectively. Almost two thirds of enrolled children (64%) were boys, more than one third (35%) were African American, and 65% were white. The injury and noninjury groups were similar with respect to maternal age and maternal education. The noninjury group was more likely to have Medicaid insurance compared to the injury group (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Demographic Variable
| Injury Group n = 82 (%) |
Noninjury Group n = 82 (%) |
P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Child’s race | 0.08 | ||
| White | 57 (69.5%) | 44 (53.7%) | |
| Black | 20 (24.4%) | 33 (40.2%) | |
| Other | 1 (1.2%) | 2 (2.4%) | |
| Maternal ageVmean (SD) | 36.2 (7.1) | 34.6 (6.9) | 0.17 |
| Insurance category | 0.004 | ||
| Medicaid | 21 (25.6%) | 43 (52.4%) | |
| Self-pay | 11 (13.4%) | 4 (4.9%) | |
| Commercial | 49 (59.7%) | 34 (41.5%) | |
| Maternal education | 0.24 | ||
| Some high school or less | 9 (12.5%) | 15 (18.3%) | |
| High school | 20 (24.4%) | 25 (30.5%) | |
| Technical or trade school | 7 (8.5%) | 6 (7.3%) | |
| Some college | 24 (29.3%) | 25 (30.5%) | |
| College and above | 20 (24.4%) | 9 (11.0%) | |
| Maternal relationship status | 0.10 | ||
| Married or living as married | 57 (69.5%) | 50 (61.0%) | |
| Never married | 13 (15.9%) | 10 (12.2%) | |
| Divorced or separated | 10 (12.2%) | 20 (24.4%) |
Overall, 14% of children had a Vanderbilt response from their mothers consistent with ADHD, ODD, or anxiety/depression. The injury and noninjury groups were similar with respect to ADHD symptoms (9.8% in both injury and noninjury groups) and other co-morbid mental health problems (ODD and anxiety/depression). The inattentive subtype of ADHD, although elevated in the injured group of children, was not statistically different than the noninjured group. (OR, 2.6; (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43–20.0); Table 2).
TABLE 2.
Mental Illness Screen
| Injury Group n = 82 |
Noninjury Group n = 82 |
OR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| ADHD inattentive subtype | 6.1% | 2.4% | 2.60 (0.49–13.79) |
| ADHD hyperactive subtype | 2.4% | 2.4% | 1.00 (0.14–7.27) |
| ADHD combined subtype | 1.2% | 4.9% | 0.24 (0.03–2.20) |
| ADHD (any subtype) | 9.8% | 9.8% | 1.00 (0.36–2.81) |
| ODD | 6.1% | 8.5% | 0.70 (0.21–2.20) |
| Anxiety/depression | 0.0% | 4.8% | Cannot be preformed |
DISCUSSION
Many children in our study were found to have ADHD symptoms as reported by their mothers that were previously unrecognized by ED providers. The frequency of ADHD in this sample of children presenting for emergency care is consistent with other studies in our local area and nationally.26–28 However, this study only takes into consideration the unrecognized burden of ADHD symptoms because children with a known history of ADHD where excluded. If this is this case, then there may be at least as many children with unrecognized and undiagnosed ADHD as the 2% to 13% prevalence of diagnosed ADHD in our local population and possibly the larger US population. Although not measured, including children with a known history of ADHD would likely have shown an additional burden of symptoms in the ED population.
Despite the overall frequency of unrecognized ADHD symptoms in the ED, there was no difference in ADHD symptoms between injured children and their noninjured comparisons. This lack of association may be related to the level of impairment in this population. The study participants may represent a less severely affected group of children with ADHD symptoms, whereas children with more severe ADHD symptoms may have already been identified and treated. Children treated with stimulants for ADHD or presumed ADHD have been shown to be more frequent users of a wide range of medical services including emergency care and are more likely to be injured than are other children.20 Whether ADHD symptom severity moderates the ADHD and injury association is an important next step in the understanding the role of ADHD screening in children presenting with injuries. In addition, the frequency of the inattentive subtype of ADHD was greater in the injury group although not statistically different. Children who are inattentive may be less alert and aware of their surroundings, thus more likely to be injured. Future studies will need to include larger sample sizes to be adequately powered to examine this association.
The Vanderbilt Scale assessed symptoms of ODD in the 2 groups and found a similar frequency of symptoms in injured and noninjured children. In contrast to previous work, a child presenting with an injury in this study was no more likely than a child with other medical presentations to have symptoms of ODD.10 Larger numbers of children presenting with ODD would be needed to better examine the injury/ODD association.
The study did not use multiple informants in the assessment of ADHD symptoms limiting our ability to make a firm diagnosis (consistent with DSM-IV criteria) and restricting the generalizability of the findings. Although we were interested in the unrecognized burden of ADHD symptoms in the population of injured children presenting to the ED, it may have been useful to include children with a history of ADHD and a measure of global impairment to enhance our understanding of the relationship between ADHD severity and injury.
In summary, there appears to be a large burden of ADHD symptoms that are medically unrecognized in the children presenting for care in the ED; however, ADHD symptom frequency was not significantly different in injured and noninjured patients in this study. Screening for unrecognized ADHD in children presenting specifically for injury is not supported by this study. Future studies examining the severity of ADHD symptoms, the effect of common co-morbid conditions associated with ADHD (ODD and depression) together with a child’s global impairment and their possible associations with a visit for an injury may shed light on important mediators between ADHD and injury visits and lead to improved screening criteria. This study did not find an association of a childhood emergency visit and unrecognized ADHD; however, this study suggests there is a large population of children using emergency services who have unrecognized ADHD and who may benefit from behavioral and mental health services.
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by a grant from the Medical Student Summer Research Fellowship, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine (Z. Pittsenbarger), in part from the National Institute of Mental Health (5K23MH063716–02: Dr. Grupp-Phelan) and in part from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (1K23HD045770–01A2: Dr. Phelan).
REFERENCES
- 1.American Psychiatric Association Fact Sheet. Attention Deficit: Hyperactivity Disorder. Available at http://www.healthyminds.org/adhdfacts.cfm 2001. Accessed January 2004.
- 2.Rowland A, Umbach D, Stallone L, et al. Prevelance of medication treatment for attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder among elementary school children in Johnson County, North Carolina. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(2):231–234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bussing R, Menvielle E, Zima B. Relationship between behavioral problems and unintentional injuries in US children. Findings of the 1988 National Health Interview Survey. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150(1):50–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schwebel DC, Hodgens JB, Sterling S. How mothers parent their children with behavior disorders: implications for unintentional injury risk. J Safety Res. 2006;37(2):167–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schwebel D, Speltz M, Jones K, et al. Unintentional injury in preschool boys with and without early onset of disruptive behavior. J Pediatr Psychol. 2002;27(8):727–737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schwebel D, Brezausek C, Ramey S, et al. Interactions between child behavior patterns and parenting: implications for children’s unintentional injury risk. J Pediatr Psychol. 2004;29(2):93–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schwebel D, Brezausek C. The role of fathers in toddlers’ unintentional injury risk. J Pediatr Psychol. 2004;29(1):19–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schwebel D, Barton B. Contributions of multiple risk factors in child injury. J Pediatr Psychol. 2005;30(7):553–561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schwebel D. The role of impulsivity in children’s estimation of physical ability: implications for children’s unintentional injury risk. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2004;74(4):584–588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rowe R, Simonoff E, Silberg JL. Psychopathology, temperament and unintentional injury: cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007;48(1):71–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pastor PN, Reuben CA. Identified attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and medically attended, nonfatal injuries: US school-age children, 1997–2002. Ambul Pediatr. 2006;6(1):38–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Flory K, Milich R, Lynam D, et al. Relation between childhood disruptive behavior disorders and substance use and dependence symptoms in young adulthood: individuals with symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and conduct disorder are uniquely at risk. Psychol Addict Behav. 2003;17(2):151–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Farmer J, Peterson L. Injury risk factors in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Health Psychol. 1995;124(4):325–332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Phelan KJ, Khoury J, Kalkwarf H, et al. Residential injuries in U.S. children and adolescents. Public Health Rep. 2005;120(1):63–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Center for Disease Control. WISQARS (Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System). Available at http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/wisqars/default.htm 2002. Accessed January 2004.
- 16.Phillipakis A, Hemenway D, et al. A quantification of preventable unintentional childhood injury mortality in the United States. Injury Prevention. 2004;10:79–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Byrne J, Bawden H, Beattie T, et al. Risk for injury in preschoolers: relationship to attention deficit disorder. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn Sect C Child Neuropsychol. 2003;9(2):142–151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lam L. Attention deficit disorder and hospitalization due to injury among older adolescents in New South Wales Australia. Atten Disord. 2002;6(2):77–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Burt C, Fingerhut L. Injury visits to hospital emergency departments: United States, 1992–95. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 1998. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Miller AR, Brehaut JC, Raina P, et al. Use of medical services by methylphenidate-treated children in the general population. Ambul Pediatr. 2004;4(2):174–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Brehaut JC, Miller A, Raina P, et al. Childhood behavior disorders and injuries among children and youth: a population-based study. Pediatrics. 2003;111(2):262–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Grupp-Phelan J, Delgado SV, Kelleher KJ. Failure of psychiatric referrals from the pediatric emergency department. BMC Emerg Med. 2007;7:12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.NICHQ ADHD Practitioners’ Toolkit. National Initiative for Children’s Healthcare Quality. Boston: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wolraich M, Lambert W, Doffing M, et al. Psychometric properties of the Vanderbilt ADHD diagnostic parent rating scale in a referred population. J Pediatr Psychol. 2003;28(8):559–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Froehlich TE, Lanphear BP, Epstein JN, et al. Prevalence, recognition, and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a national sample of US children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(9): 857–864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cincinnati Childrens Hospital Medical Center. Evidence based clinical practice guideline: Outpatient evaluation and management of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Available at http://www.cincinnatichildrens.org/svc/alpha/h/health-policy/ev-based/adhd.htm 2005. Accessed January 2004.
- 27.Chan E, Zhan C, Homer C. Health care use and costs for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: national estimates from the medical expenditure panel survey. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002; 156(1):504–511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Doyne E, Davis J, Bernier J, et al. The evaluation and management of ADHD patients in a practice-based research network. Pediatric Research. 2004;55(4):84A. [Google Scholar]
