Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2020 Jan 10;11(4):1443–1449. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03462

Revealing Ultrafast Population Transfer between Nearly Degenerate Electronic States

Pascal Heim †, Sebastian Mai ‡, Bernhard Thaler †, Stefan Cesnik †, Davide Avagliano ‡, Dimitra Bella-Velidou ‡, Wolfgang E Ernst †, Leticia González ‡,*, Markus Koch †,*
PMCID: PMC7052817  PMID: 31918552

Abstract

graphic file with name jz9b03462_0004.jpg

The response of a molecule to photoexcitation is governed by the coupling of its electronic states. However, if the energetic spacing between the electronically excited states at the Franck–Condon window becomes sufficiently small, it is infeasible to selectively excite and monitor individual states with conventional time-resolved spectroscopy, preventing insight into the energy transfer and relaxation dynamics of the molecule. Here, we demonstrate how the combination of time-resolved spectroscopy and extensive surface hopping dynamics simulations with a global fit approach on individually excited ensembles overcomes this limitation and resolves the dynamics in the n3p Rydberg states in acetone. Photoelectron transients of the three closely spaced states n3px, n3py, and n3pz are used to validate the theoretical results, which in turn allow retrieving a comprehensive kinetic model describing the mutual interactions of these states for the first time.

The mechanistic understanding of the initial processes in light-induced molecular excited-state dynamics is both of fundamental interest and essential for the development of various technological applications, for example efficient light-harvesting systems1 or molecular machines.2 The first steps of these dynamics, which proceed in the femto- to picosecond range, are often accompanied by nonadiabatic population transfer between the excited states and can therefore be observed in real time with ultrafast time-resolved spectroscopy.3 Such spectroscopy, in conjunction with state-of-the-art excited-state computational chemistry methods has revealed general concepts for understanding excited-state interactions in molecules4−7 by using static8,9 as well as dynamic10,11 approaches. Nevertheless, following the nonadiabatic dynamics of molecules becomes rather challenging when the energy differences between excited electronic states within the Franck–Condon window becomes small. Although in polyatomic molecules the density of states is generally large, the situation can be particularly demanding in transition metal complexes,12,13 extended biomolecules,14 or within the Rydberg manifolds of small molecules, where not only higher-lying states in the Rydberg series are close in energy,15 but also occasionally low-lying states,16 especially if they have the same principal quantum number (e.g., n3px, n3py, n3pz). Spectroscopic observation of the dynamical behavior of the individual states is then often buried under the “averaged” population decay of all states within the particular energetic region. These experimental difficulties have two reasons. First, the energetic proximity of the states in combination with the spectral width of sufficiently short laser pulses does not allow exciting single electronic states, but rather creates a complex distribution of population in multiple states. Second, simple sequential or parallel decay models, which can be routinely applied in data analysis via global fitting routines in simpler situations,17−20 cannot accommodate complex relaxation pathways and state mixing arising from multiple couplings. These two issues obscure the nonadiabatic processes occurring within a dense set of states, requiring specialized approaches to obtain a comprehensive mechanistic understanding of the energy transfer in certain molecules.

In this work, we demonstrate that the combination of time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy (TRPES)21,22 and surface hopping simulations with the SHARC method11 is able to fully characterize the dynamics in the regime of multiple nearly degenerate electronic states. Specifically, we are resolving the population transfer dynamics in the n3p Rydberg manifold of the acetone molecule after two-photon excitation. The photophysical and photochemical processes involving acetone have been in the spotlight since the early days of femtochemistry,23−25 with a recent renaissance15,26−30 motivated by the importance of acetone as the simplest aliphatic ketone. The difficulty of resolving light-induced processes in acetone derives from its electronic structure, characterized by series of Rydberg states that are strongly coupled to valence states, with the consequence of complex nonadiabatic relaxation dynamics where the electronic population is cascading down the ladder of Rydberg states.15,28,30−32 As shown schematically in Figure 1a, the n3p manifold, energetically located at the lower end of the Rydberg series, consists of the three states n3px (A2, 7.34 eV), n3py (A1, 7.40 eV), and n3pz (B2, 7.45 eV),16 lying within about 100 meV in the Franck–Condon region of the ground state. This manifold of states was investigated in time-resolved experiments and is considered to play an important role in the population transfer to lower states.26,27,29 The energetic proximity of the three n3p states leads to significant vibrational coupling and—together with the presence of symmetry-dependent couplings with the ππ* (A1) valence state—a complex interaction among all these states.33−37 As a consequence, the dynamics of the individual n3p states within this dense region has evaded detailed observation to date, despite the importance of the n3p manifold as the bottleneck for the radiationless deactivation pathways of the higher-lying Rydberg states.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Schematic overview of the relevant potential energy surfaces of acetone excited states, including the n3p and ππ* states. (b) Basic kinetic model assumed for the nonadiabatic dynamics among the acetone n3p and ππ* states with the nine considered time constants.

Here, we solve this problem and follow the transient population of the acetone n3p Rydberg states after excitation in terms of the individual nonadiabatic transition time scales between the four most important states: n3px, n3py, n3pz, and ππ*. We note here that it was previously shown in the literature29,32 that also other dark states (nπ* and n3s) might be involved in the dynamics. Hence, in the kinetic model fits, our label “ππ*” collectively includes also those dark states, although the ππ*, nπ*, and n3s states are explicitly present in both the experiments and the simulations. The transition time scales between the four states are summarized in Figure 1b, which shows the six inter-Rydberg time constants (τxy, τyx, τxz, τzx, τyz, and τzy) and the three Rydberg decay time constants (τxπ, τyπ, and τzπ) considered here. We describe the population dynamics by the following system of differential equations representing a unimolecular first-order kinetic model:

graphic file with name jz9b03462_m001.jpg 1

where Inline graphic is the vector containing the time-dependent state populations. The coupling matrix M contains the nine time constants:

graphic file with name jz9b03462_m003.jpg 2

and g(t)P⃗0 is the source term that populates the states (containing the temporal profile of the laser excitation g(t) and a state-dependent prefactor P⃗0). The main goal of our study is to assign the numeric values of the nine time constants and to investigate their dependence on the excitation energy. This task can be achieved only by a combination of experiment and simulation. The experiment can observe only “effective” time constants τm, which are related to the eigenvalues λm of the coupling matrix M by τm = λm–1 (in the following, m enumerates the eigenvalues of M). These effective time constants correspond to the so-called decay associated spectra (DAS),17−20 discussed in detail in section S1 in the Supporting Information. As we do not consider the decay of the ππ* state here, one eigenvalue of M is always zero (i.e., one effective time constant is infinite), leaving in principle three time constants that could be obtained from the experiment. In contrast, appropriate nonadiabatic dynamics simulations can directly access the electronic populations of each individual state, what allows obtaining all nine individual time constants from a suitable global fit. The effective time constants derived from the simulated coupling matrix can then be compared to the experimental ones to verify the accuracy of the simulations.

In the TRPES experiments, isolated acetone molecules are excited into the n3p manifold by two-photon pump excitation (320 to 336 nm) and the transient population is probed after a variable time delay via one-photon probe photoionization (402 nm). The time-resolved photoelectron spectrum (see section S2 in the Supporting Information for details on the energy calibration) for 333 nm excitation is exemplarily shown in Figure 2 (see section S3 in the Supporting Information for results at other excitation wavelengths). In the spectrum, the n3px, n3py and n3pz states are observed as separated photoelectron bands. The photoelectron kinetic energies (probe photon energy plus state energy minus ionization potential, see section S2 in the Supporting Information) of the three bands are centered at approximately 0.75, 0.80, and 0.84 eV, respectively. The narrow Franck–Condon envelope of the three bands indicates Rydberg state ionization to the ionic ground state with a Δν = 0 propensity rule. The n3py and n3pz states are simultaneously populated at t = 0 fs and show similar signal increase and decrease. In contrast, the n3px signal behaves differently, building up later and decreasing much more slowly.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Overview of the experimental results. Measured transient photoelectron spectra (a), the 2D global fit of the spectrum (b) with corresponding DAS (c) for 333 nm pump wavelength (Eexc = 7.44 eV). Panel d shows the time constant dependence over excitation energy, including three data points from Hüter and Temps.27 The red lines in panels a and b indicate a change of the vertical axis scale. PE, photoelectron kinetic energy; Eexc, two-photon excitation energy.

We fit the measured photoelectron spectrum S(E, t) (Figure 2a) with a 2D global fit routine to the following function:17−20

graphic file with name jz9b03462_m004.jpg 3

where Θ(t) is the Heaviside step function; τm = λm–1 are the effective time constants, and DASm(E) are the decay-associated spectra (see section S1 in the Supporting Information). By varying the number of decay-associated spectra and time constants contained in the global fit, we find that m = {1, 2} (fit shown in Figure 2b) is sufficient and m = {1, 2, 3} does not increase the fit quality. This finding reflects the apparent similarity of the n3py and n3pz transient signals. Hence, it appears that two of the three relevant effective time constants are very similar and that two time constants are sufficient to describe the time-resolved photoelectron spectrum. The two corresponding DAS (Figure 2c) confirm that n3py and n3pz behave very similar, as given by the two peaks of the DAS corresponding to τ2. Consequently, we can assign the larger constant τ1 to the decay of n3px and the smaller constant τ2 to the parallel decay of the n3py and n3pz states. Unfortunately, the DAS does not allow uncovering more details of the complex population transfer between the different n3p states other than a population transfer from n3py and n3pz to n3px, which is indicated by the negative DAS amplitude of the fast time constant.

The dependence of the effective time constants on the excitation energy is plotted in Figure 2d. Whereas τ2 seems to remain constant at about 150 fs, τ1 is strongly energy-dependent and decreases from about 1800 to 700 fs upon increasing the pump energy. At the highest excitation energy (7.75 eV), our values of τ1 show very good agreement with the results of Hüter and Temps.27 Moreover, time constants reported by these authors for higher energies show a consistent behavior in the energy dependence. Unfortunately, their energy resolution did not allow separating the different n3p states, so that they did not report decay constants that could be compared to our τ2 values.

As the experiment cannot obtain the individual matrix elements of M, we performed nonadiabatic dynamics simulations using the surface hopping approach SHARC.11,38 The potential energy surfaces were described employing a linear vibronic coupling (LVC) model39 composed of 49 diabatic electronic states, including all states from the S0 ground state to the ππ* state, which is the S48 at the Franck–Condon geometry. We propagated (see section S4 in the Supporting Information) three independent ensembles of about 1000 trajectories each, in which the initial electronic wave function was the pure n3px, n3py, or n3pz state. For each ensemble we monitored the population of the n3px, n3py, n3pz, and ππ* states, resulting in a set of 12 population transients. This strategy of simulating the decay of each initial state separately is essential, because there are nine independent time constants to fit and employing only four population transients (from a single ensemble) would lead to severe overfitting.

Fitted population transients are presented in Figure 3. Panels a–c show the temporal evolution of the 12 population transients together with the fitting functions; the kinetic model fits the data excellently, with almost no systematic deviations. The obtained time constants, which are shown in Figure 3d together with their error estimates (obtained by bootstrapping), are quite interesting for the following three reasons: (i) The six inter-Rydberg time constants are relatively similar, with all constants ranging from 390 to 530 fs except τxy (700 fs). (ii) Population transfer toward energetically lower states proceeds faster (τzx, τzy, and τyx) than vice versa (τxz, τyz, and τxy). (iii) According to the three Rydberg decay constants, the n3py state decays the fastest among the n3p states (5 and 13 times faster than n3pz and n3px, respectively), as previously suggested in the literature.33−37 The time constants for the n3pz and n3px states have large errors because the simulation time (1000 fs) is smaller than these estimated time constants. Especially the time constant for n3px is extremely large and imprecise, which indicates that this time constant is not necessary to describe the population transients. As expected, the fastest decay occurs from the n3py state to the ππ* state, because both states have the same symmetry (A1) and it is sufficient to accumulate energy in one of the totally symmetric modes that lead to an avoided crossing of these states. This situation is different from the decay between states of different symmetry, which requires accumulated energy in at least two normal modes: a totally symmetric tuning mode that makes the diabatic energies equal and a nonsymmetric coupling mode of the correct irreducible representation that induces some coupling between two states. The requirement of two activated normal modes explains why all population transfer processes between states of different symmetry are slower than the same-symmetry n3py → ππ* transfer. In general, the magnitude of the time constants suggests that in acetone the n3p Rydberg states readily interconvert among each other because of their energetic closeness and the presence of coupling modes of all required symmetries.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Overview of the theoretical results obtained with the SHARC-LVC method. (a–c) Temporal evolution of the diabatic populations (thin lines) and kinetic model fits (thick lines), for the ensemble starting in (a) n3px, (b) n3py, and (c) n3pz. (d) Scheme showing the fitted time constants and associated errors (see Figure S8 in section S4 in the Supporting Information for a similar fit enforcing detailed balance, showing that τxy might be overestimated and τxz underestimated but otherwise the time constants are consistent with detailed balance). (e) Plot of the energy dependence of the eigenvalue-derived effective time constants and comparison to the experimental and literature27 values.

In order to obtain information about the energy dependence of the relaxation time constants, we group all trajectories into 11 subensembles based on their individual excitation energies. All fitted time constants are presented in section S5 in the Supporting Information. The energy intervals and the corresponding effective time constants obtained are shown in Figure 3e. The agreement of the energy dependence of the computed effective time constants with its experimental counterpart is very good. The simulated values shown in Figure 3e confirm that there is one strongly energy-dependent effective time constant (τ1), being about 1600 fs for the lowest energies and about 500 fs for the highest ones. Additionally, there are two almost identical effective time constants (τ2 and τ3) in the range of approximately 80–200 fs, only weakly depending on energy.

In conclusion, we demonstrate how a combination of TRPES with extensive surface hopping simulations is able to reveal the details of nonadiabatic dynamics in energetically dense sets of states. Our synergistic approach allows disentangling the interconversion time scales among the three n3p states (n3px, n3py, and n3pz) and the decay time scales to the dark ππ* state in acetone. This work constitutes the first study that resolves the highly nonsequential population flow among these nearly degenerate states. An important key of accessing the individual time constants was the simulation of multiple independent ensembles with complementary initial conditions, as otherwise the global fit is severely under-determined. Despite the known limitations of trajectory surface-hopping methods,40−42 the results of the simulations—validated through their good agreement with the experimental effective time constants and energy dependence, see also a simulated TRPES spectrum in Figure S20 in the Supporting Information—show that the n3py is most strongly coupled to the ππ* state and exhibits the fastest decay, as expected from symmetry arguments. The n3py also acts as the gateway state for the deactivation of the n3px and n3pz states, as indicated by the fact that the n3px/z→ n3py → ππ* route is faster than the direct n3px/z→ ππ* routes. The present results are expected to be helpful in understanding the light-driven dynamics of other aliphatic ketones and designing similar experiments. Further, they also evidence the power of using a linear vibronic coupling Hamiltonian within surface-hopping dynamics, as it allows considering large ensembles of trajectories propagating over a large number of electronic states.

Methods

Experimental Methods. Pump–probe experiments were performed with femtosecond laser pulses from a commercial Ti:sapphire laser system with 800 nm central wavelength (for details, see ref (28)). Pump pulses were frequency up-converted by combining optical parametric amplification and subsequent frequency quadrupling to a wavelength range from 320 to 336 nm (6 nm, 15 meV full width at half-maximum, fwhm). Probe pulses of 402 nm (3 nm, 60 meV fwhm) were obtained by frequency doubling with a BBO crystal. Dichroic mirrors were used in both beam paths to remove undesired wavelengths from the up-conversion process. The laser pulses were focused into the extraction region of a 0.5 m long, linear magnetic bottle time-of-flight spectrometer43 where a small retarding field was used to increase the electron kinetic energy resolution. High-purity acetone was introduced into the chamber as background gas with a partial pressure of about 4 × 10–6 mbar.

Computational Methods. Potential energy surfaces of all electronic states of acetone were represented with a linear vibronic coupling (LVC) model39,44 including all 24 vibrational degrees of freedom and 49 electronic states. This large number of states is necessary in order to include the important ππ* state at the reference geometry (S48). The reference harmonic potential was obtained from an optimization plus frequency calculation for the n3s state at the SOS-ADC(2) level of theory.45 Parameters for the description of the excited-state potentials were obtained from calculations at the same level of theory. The basis set was a combination of cc-pVTZ46 for C and O, cc-pVDZ46 for H, and an additional 10s8p6d4f Rydberg basis set47 at O. All electronic structure calculations were carried out with Turbomole 7.0.48

Initial conditions were sampled from the Wigner distribution of the SOS-ADC(2) harmonic oscillator of the ground state, generating 1000 initial geometries and velocities. Three independent sets of trajectories were simulated from these, starting in the n3px, n3py, or n3pz diabatic state. The trajectories were propagated with SHARC2.011,38 for 1000 fs using a 0.5 fs time step; the electronic coefficients were propagated with a 0.02 fs step using the local diabatization approach.49 We applied an energy-based decoherence correction50 and rescaled the full momentum vector during a hop.

The results were analyzed in terms of the diabatic state populations, to which the kinetic model was fitted. Additional analysis was carried out by dividing the set of trajectories into different energy windows and fitting their populations independently.

See the Supporting Information for additional computational details.

Acknowledgments

P.H., B.T., S.C., W.E.E., and M.K. thank the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) for Grant P29369-N36 and NAWI Graz for financial support. S.M., D.A., and L.G. thank the FWF (Grant I2883) and the University of Vienna for financial support. The authors also thank the European Cost Action Attosecond Chemistry (CA18222). The presented calculations were partly carried out at the Vienna Scientific Cluster (VSC3).

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03462.

  • Discussion and derivation of the fitting functions, experimental details regarding energy calibration, additional experimental results, additional computational details, and computational results (PDF)

  • V0 data in SHARC format (TXT)

  • LVC parameters in SHARC format (TXT)

Author Present Address

S.M.: Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.

Author Contributions

§ P.H. and S.M. contributed equally to this work.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

jz9b03462_si_001.pdf (7.8MB, pdf)
jz9b03462_si_002.txt (15KB, txt)
jz9b03462_si_003.txt (332.4KB, txt)

References

  1. Herek J. L.; Wohlleben W.; Cogdell R. J.; Zeidler D.; Motzkus M. Quantum control of energy flow in light harvesting. Nature 2002, 417, 533–535. 10.1038/417533a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Balzani V.; Credi A.; Venturi M. Light powered molecular machines. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1542–1550. 10.1039/b806328c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Weinacht T., Pearson B. J., Eds. Time-resolved spectroscopy: An experimental perspective; CRC Press, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  4. Blanchet V.; Zgierski M. Z.; Seideman T.; Stolow A. Discerning vibronic molecular dynamics using time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy. Nature 1999, 401, 52–54. 10.1038/43410. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Polli D.; Altoe P.; Weingart O.; Spillane K. M.; Manzoni C.; Brida D.; Tomasello G.; Orlandi G.; Kukura P.; Mathies R. A.; et al. Conical intersection dynamics of the primary photoisomerization event in vision. Nature 2010, 467, 440–443. 10.1038/nature09346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Schuurman M. S.; Stolow A. Dynamics at conical intersections. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2018, 69, 427–450. 10.1146/annurev-physchem-052516-050721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Timmers H.; Zhu X.; Li Z.; Kobayashi Y.; Sabbar M.; Hollstein M.; Reduzzi M.; Martínez T. J.; Neumark D. M.; Leone S. R. Disentangling conical intersection and coherent molecular dynamics in methyl bromide with attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3133. 10.1038/s41467-019-10789-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Garavelli M. Computational organic photochemistry: Strategy, achievements and perspectives. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2006, 116, 87–105. 10.1007/s00214-005-0030-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Robb M. A.Theoretical chemistry for electronic excited states; Theoretical and Computational Chemistry Series; The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2018; pp P001–225. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lasorne B.; Worth G. A.; Robb M. A. Excited-state dynamics. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2011, 1, 460–475. 10.1002/wcms.26. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mai S.; Marquetand P.; González L. Nonadiabatic dynamics: The SHARC approach. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2018, 8, e1370. 10.1002/wcms.1370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chergui M. On the interplay between charge, spin and structural dynamics in transition metal complexes. Dalton Trans 2012, 41, 13022–13029. 10.1039/c2dt30764b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Atkins A. J.; González L. Trajectory surface-hopping dynamics including intersystem crossing in [Ru(bpy)3]2+. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 3840–3845. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nogueira J. J.; Plasser F.; González L. Electronic delocalization, charge transfer and hypochromism in the UV absorption spectrum of polyadenine unravelled by multiscale computations and quantitative wavefunction analysis. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 5682–5691. 10.1039/C7SC01600J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Koch M.; Thaler B.; Heim P.; Ernst W. E. The role of Rydberg-valence coupling in the ultrafast relaxation dynamics of acetone. J. Phys. Chem. A 2017, 121, 6398–6404. 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b05012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nobre M.; Fernandes A.; da Silva F. F.; Antunes R.; Almeida D.; Kokhan V.; Hoffmann S. V.; Mason N.; Eden S.; Limão-Vieira P. The VUV electronic spectroscopy of acetone studied by synchrotron radiation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 550–560. 10.1039/B708580J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Holzapfel W.; Finkele U.; Kaiser W.; Oesterhelt D.; Scheer H.; Stilz H. U.; Zinth W. Initial electron-transfer in the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1990, 87, 5168–5172. 10.1073/pnas.87.13.5168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. van Stokkum I. H.; Larsen D. S.; van Grondelle R. Global and target analysis of time-resolved spectra. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Bioenerg. 2004, 1657, 82–104. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2004.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wu G.; Boguslavskiy A. E.; Schalk O.; Schuurman M. S.; Stolow A. Ultrafast non-adiabatic dynamics of methyl substituted ethylenes: The π3s Rydberg state. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 135, 164309. 10.1063/1.3652966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schalk O.; Boguslavskiy A. E.; Stolow A. Substituent effects on dynamics at conical intersections: Cyclopentadienes. J. Phys. Chem. A 2010, 114, 4058–4064. 10.1021/jp911286s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stolow A.; Bragg A. E.; Neumark D. M. Femtosecond time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 1719–1758. 10.1021/cr020683w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hertel I. V.; Radloff W. Ultrafast dynamics in isolated molecules and molecular clusters. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2006, 69, 1897. 10.1088/0034-4885/69/6/R06. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim S. K.; Pedersen S.; Zewail A. H. Direct femtosecond observation of the transient intermediate in the α-cleavage reaction of (CH3)2CO to 2CH3+CO: Resolving the issue of concertedness. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 477. 10.1063/1.469614. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Shibata T.; Suzuki T. Photofragment ion imaging with femtosecond laser pulses. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 262, 115–119. 10.1016/0009-2614(96)01024-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Buzza S. A.; Snyder E. M.; Castleman A. W. Further direct evidence for stepwise dissociation of acetone and acetone clusters. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 104, 5040. 10.1063/1.471133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rusteika N.; Møller K. B.; Sølling T. I. New insights on the photodynamics of acetone excited with 253–288nm femtosecond pulses. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 461, 193–197. 10.1016/j.cplett.2008.06.079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hüter O.; Temps F. Ultrafast α–CC bond cleavage of acetone upon excitation to 3p and 3d Rydberg states by femtosecond time-resolved photoelectron imaging. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 145, 214312. 10.1063/1.4971243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Maierhofer P.; Bainschab M.; Thaler B.; Heim P.; Ernst W. E.; Koch M. Disentangling multichannel photodissociation dynamics in acetone by time-resolved photoelectron-photoion coincidence spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. A 2016, 120, 6418–6423. 10.1021/acs.jpca.6b07238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Couch D. E.; Kapteyn H. C.; Murnane M. M.; Peters W. K. Uncovering highly-excited state mixing in acetone using ultrafast VUV pulses and coincidence imaging techniques. J. Phys. Chem. A 2017, 121, 2361–2366. 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b01112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Uenishi R.; Horio T.; Suzuki T. Time-resolved photoelectron imaging of acetone with 9.3 eV photoexcitation. J. Phys. Chem. A 2019, 123, 6848–6853. 10.1021/acs.jpca.9b05179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Koch M.; Heim P.; Thaler B.; Kitzler M.; Ernst W. E. Direct observation of a photochemical activation energy: a case study of acetone photodissociation. J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 2017, 50, 125102. 10.1088/1361-6455/aa6a71. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sølling T. I.; Diau E. W.-G.; Kötting C.; De Feyter S.; Zewail A. H. Femtochemistry of Norrish Type I reactions: IV. Highly excited ketones—Experimental. ChemPhysChem 2002, 3, 79–97. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Thakur S. N.; Guo D.; Kundu T.; Goodman L. Two-photon photoacoustic spectroscopy of acetone 3p Rydberg states. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1992, 199, 335–340. 10.1016/0009-2614(92)80128-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Xing X.; McDiarmid R.; Philis J. G.; Goodman L. Vibrational assignments in the 3p Rydberg states of acetone. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99, 7565–7573. 10.1063/1.465686. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Merchán M.; Roos B. O.; McDiarmid R.; Xing X. A combined theoretical and experimental determination of the electronic spectrum of acetone. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 104, 1791. 10.1063/1.470976. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. ter Steege D. H. A.; Wirtz A. C.; Buma W. J. Vibronic coupling in excited states of acetone. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 547–560. 10.1063/1.1423946. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. McDiarmid R.; Xing X. Nonadiabatic coupling of the 3p Rydberg and ππ* valence states of acetone. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 675–679. 10.1063/1.475152. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mai S.; Richter M.; Heindl M.; Menger M. F. S. J.; Atkins A. J.; Ruckenbauer M.; Plasser F.; Oppel M.; Marquetand P.; González L.. SHARC2.0: Surface Hopping Including Arbitrary Couplings – program package for non-adiabatic dynamics; sharc-md.org, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  39. Plasser F.; Gómez S.; Mai S.; González L. Highly efficient surface hopping dynamics using a linear vibronic coupling model. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 57–69. 10.1039/C8CP05662E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Subotnik J. E.; Jain A.; Landry B.; Petit A.; Ouyang W.; Bellonzi N. Understanding the surface hopping view of electronic transitions and decoherence. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2016, 67, 387–417. 10.1146/annurev-physchem-040215-112245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang L.; Akimov A.; Prezhdo O. V. Recent progress in surface hopping: 2011–2015. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 2100–2112. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Plasser F.; Mai S.; Fumanal M.; Gindensperger E.; Daniel C.; González L. Strong influence of decoherence corrections and momentum rescaling in surface hopping dynamics of transition metal complexes. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 5031–5045. 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kruit P.; Read F. Magnetic field paralleliser for 2π electron-spectrometer and electron-image magnifier. J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 1983, 16, 313. 10.1088/0022-3735/16/4/016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Fumanal M.; Plasser F.; Mai S.; Daniel C.; Gindensperger E. Interstate vibronic coupling constants between electronic excited states for complex molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 2018, 148, 124119. 10.1063/1.5022760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Dreuw A.; Wormit M. The algebraic diagrammatic construction scheme for the polarization propagator for the calculation of excited states. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2015, 5, 82–95. 10.1002/wcms.1206. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Dunning T. H. Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 1007–1023. 10.1063/1.456153. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kaufmann K.; Baumeister W.; Jungen M. Universal Gaussian basis sets for an optimum representation of Rydberg and continuum wavefunctions. J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 1989, 22, 2223. 10.1088/0953-4075/22/14/007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. TURBOMOLE V7.0, A development of University of Karlsruhe and Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  49. Granucci G.; Persico M.; Toniolo A. Direct semiclassical simulation of photochemical processes with semiempirical wave functions. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 10608–10615. 10.1063/1.1376633. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Granucci G.; Persico M. Critical appraisal of the fewest switches algorithm for surface hopping. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 134114. 10.1063/1.2715585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

jz9b03462_si_001.pdf (7.8MB, pdf)
jz9b03462_si_002.txt (15KB, txt)
jz9b03462_si_003.txt (332.4KB, txt)

Articles from The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES