Skip to main content
BMC Medical Genetics logoLink to BMC Medical Genetics
. 2020 Mar 2;21:46. doi: 10.1186/s12881-020-0978-5

Identification of differentially expressed miRNAs and mRNAs in synovial of osteoarthritis via RNA-sequencing

Yu Zhou 1,#, Zhicong Wang 1,#, Xi Chen 1,, Jianjun Zhang 1, Ling Yang 1, Shuping Liu 1, Yuehong Liu 1,
PMCID: PMC7053084  PMID: 32122327

Abstract

Background

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis and a leading cause of disability. This study attempted to investigate the key mRNAs and miRNAs related to OA.

Patients and methods

From April 17th, 2018 to May 17th, 2018, five patients with OA and three normal controls were enrolled in this present study. To identify the differentially expressed mRNAs (DEmRNAs) and miRNAs (DEmiRNAs) between patients with OA and normal controls, RNA-sequencing was performed. Then, DEmiRNA-target DEmRNAs analysis and functional annotation of DEmiRNA-target DEmRNAs were performed. To validate the RNA-sequencing results, quantitative real time-PCR (RT-PCR) and western blot analysis were performed as well.

Results

A total of 1068 DEmRNAs, 21 DEmiRNAs and 395 DEmiRNA-DEmRNA pairs were identified in synovial tissues of patients with OA. The functional annotation of DEmiRNA-target DEmRNAs revealed that Pathways in cancer and PI3K-Akt signaling pathway were significantly enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways. QRT-PCR and western blot results revealed that except for TLR7, the expression level of the others was consistent with the RNA-sequencing results, generally.

Conclusion

The findings of this present study may provide new clues for the roles of DEmRNAs and DEmiRNAs in the pathogenesis of OA.

Keywords: Osteoarthritis (OA), mRNA, miRNA, RNA-sequencing, Functional annotation

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most frequent musculoskeletal disease and leads to functional decline and loss in quality of life [1]. Currently, there is no effective treatment to prevent the initiation and progression of the disease while the severity of OA often worsens with age [2]. Reportedly, it estimates that among population over 60 years old, there was 9.6% of men and 18% of women suffer from symptomatic OA in the worldwide [3]. Although the disease is with a trait of destruction of articular cartilage, pathological changes in subchondral bone and associated synovitis, the pathogenesis is poor understanding which is thought to be multifactorial [4]. Inability to diagnose early and poorly understanding of the pathophysiology makes early diagnosis to be a key factor in the prevention and management of disease [5]. Recently, molecular biology has been reported to play a vital role in explaining its disease pathophysiology, and gene regulation has been demonstrated to be involved in driving an imbalance between the expression of catabolic and anabolic factors, leading eventually to osteoarthritic cartilage degeneration [6]. There is increasing attention on the influence of dysregulation at a molecular level on the pathogenic process.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been detected widely in eukaryotes to play roles in regulating growth, development, differentiation, and metabolism in model organisms which are short (approximately 22 nucleotides), non-coding, RNA regulators of gene expression [7]. Little was known of the function of miRNAs at the stage when it is first identified in the early 1990’s by Lee et al. (in Caenorhabditis elegans) [8]. Due to the link between alterations in miRNA expression levels and multifarious disease processes have been linked, aberrant expression in pathological states has drawn public attention [9]. Studies based on highly specific patterns of miRNA expression correlate with development and several diseases have revealed the potential for therapeutic manipulation of miRNAs [10, 11]. Recently, a large number of studies have been done to explore miRNAs and genes associated with OA [5, 6, 1214]. Even so, studies on biomarkers for OA are still urgent to be performed.

In this study, differentially expressed miRNAs (DEmiRNA) and mRNAs (DEmRNAs) in synovial tissues of patients with OA were identified by RNA-sequencing. DEmiRNA-target DEmRNAs analysis and functional annotation of DEmiRNA-target DEmRNAs were performed. Quantitative real time-PCR (RT-PCR) and western blot analysis were performed to validate the RNA-sequencing results. In doing so, we hope this study could represent a new avenue to understand the pathogenesis and develop potential biomarkers for OA.

Materials and methods

Patients and samples

Five patients with OA and three normal controls were recruited in this study from April 17th, 2018 to May 17th, 2018. According to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology, OA were diagnosed [15]. Healthy employees with no symptoms or signs of OA, or any other type of arthritis, or any painful condition of the joints, were included as controls. Beside, participants with no personal or family history of OA were selected as control subjects. The participants with history of joint diseases, including inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis or any other autoimmune disease), post-traumatic or post-septic arthritis, poliomyelitis, skeletal dysplasia, were excluded. Radiographic evaluation of all participants were performed. Table 1 displayed the detailed information of all these participants. The written informed consent for use of their samples from every participant were provided in the present study. Ethical approval for this study was granted by the ethics committee of People’s Hospital of Deyang City (2017–043). Synovial tissues of every participant were obtained.

Table 1.

Patient characteristics

Index Weight (kg) Height (cm) Kellgren Lawrence grade (n) Disease duration Blood glucose (mmol/L) CRP (mg/L) ESR (mm/h) Part
Case 1 56–75 136–165 4 8 years 5.63 3.44 48 Left knee
Case 2 1 2 months 5.98 2.9 8 Left knee
Case 3 4 30 years 5.08 14 Right knee
Case 4 2 10 years 6.2 27.94 16 Left knee
Case 5 4 4 years 5.1 0 16 Right knee
Control 1 46–60 155–165 3 h Right knee
Control 2 2 h 4.62 Right knee
Control 3 1 day 5.2 Left knee

CRP C-reactive protein, ESR Erythrocyte sedimentaition ratio

RNA isolation and sequencing

Following the manufacturer’s protocol, we used TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) to isolate total RNA from samples. The concentration and purity of RNA was determined with Nanodrop ND-2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA), and the integrity of RNA was confirmed via a 2% agarose gel. With an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA), the RNA integrity number (RIN) value was obtained. With QiaQuick PCR Purification Kit, the mRNA library was constructed. The 18–30 nt RNA was obtained from the total RNA. By using TruseqTM Small RNA Sample Prep Kit, adapter ligation and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were performed to obtain the cDNA. Sequencing was performed based on HiSeq x-ten platform (Illumina) and SE50, BGIseq, respectively.

Identification of DEmRNAs in patients with OA compared with normal controls

The clean reads were aligned with the human reference genome, Ensemble GRCh38.p7 (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/Homo_sapiens) by using TopHat release 2.2.1 (http://tophat.cbcb.umd.edu/). With Cuffquant version 2.2.1 (http://cufflinks.cbcb.umd.edu/), expression of mRNAs was normalized and outputted. To determine the transcription abundance of mRNAs, fragments per Kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped (FPKM) was used. With Cuffdiff version 2.2.1 (http://cufflinks.cbcb.umd.edu/), FPKMs of mRNAs were calculated. Differentially expressed mRNAs (DEmRNAs) were identified with p < 0.05 and |log2FC| > 1. Hierarchical clustering analysis of DEmRNAs was conducted with R package “pheatmap”. The flow chart of the analyses was showed in Figure S1.

Functional annotation of DEmRNAs between patients with OA and normal controls

To further research the biological function of DEmRNAs, Gene Ontology (GO) function and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses of the DEmRNAs between patients with OA and normal controls were performed by DAVID 6.8 (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/). A value of p < 0.05 was defined as the criteria of statistical significance.

Identification of DEmiRNAs in patients with OA compared with normal controls

With Bowtie (bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net), the alignment between the cleaned miRNA sequencing reads was aligned to the human genome (GRCh38.p7 assembly) based on Genome human UCSC reference annotation. With miRDeep2 (https://www.mdc-berlin.de/8551903/en/), the transcription abundance of miRNAs was determined. Based on the read count of each sample, the DEmiRNAs in OA compared to normal controls were calculated with an R-bioconductor package, DESeq2 (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DESeq2.html). For DEmiRNAs in OA compared to normal controls, the threshold was defined as base Mean > 100, p < 0.05 and |log2FC| > 2. With R package “pheatmap”, hierarchical clustering analysis of DEmRNAs was conducted.

DEmiRNA-target DEmRNAs analysis

Given miRNAs tend to decrease the expression of their target mRNAs, we selected target genes from DEmRNAs that expressed inversely with that of miRNA for further research. Firstly, the putative targeted DEmRNAs of DEmiRNAs were predicted by six bioinformatic algorithms (RNA22, miRanda, miRDB, miRWalk, PICTAR2 and Targetscan). Then, with miRWalk, the confirmed targeted DEmRNAs of DEmiRNAs were obtained. Thirdly, the confirmed DEmiRNA-DEmRNA pairs were derived from miRWalk and the DEmiRNA-DEmRNA pairs recorded by ≥4 algorithms. Based on the obtained DEmiRNA-DEmRNA pairs, DEmiRNA-DEmRNA interaction networks between OA and normal controls were constructed by using Cytoscape software (http://www.cytoscape.org/).

Functional annotation of DEmiRNA targets

To further research the biological function of the target DEmRNAs of DEmiRNAs, GO analysis was performed t by using Gorilla (http://cbl-gorilla.cs.technion.ac.il/) with a p-value < 0.01, and KEGG pathway analysis was performed by using webgestalt (http://www.webgestalt.org/) with a p-value < 0.05.

Quantitative real time-PCR (RT-PCR) and western blot analysis

Eight synovial tissues were obtained from four patients with OA and four normal controls. The written informed consent for use of their samples from every participant were provided in the present study. Ethical approval for this study was granted by the ethics committee of People’s Hospital of Deyang City (2017–043).

Total RNA was isolated with the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA). The qRT-PCR reactions were performed based on SuperReal PreMix Plus (Invitrogen, USA) in ABI 7300 Real-time PCR Detection System. With 2-ΔΔCt method, relative gene expression was determined. The human GAPDH and ACTB were used as endogenous controls for mRNA expression, and the human hsa-U6 was used as endogenous controls for miRNA expression in analysis.

Synovial tissues were lysed on ice with RIPA lysis buffer, and then the supernatants were collected by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm at 4 °C for 30 min. The protein concentrations were detected with BCA protein assay. The protein extracts were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE, transferred onto PVDF membranes, and probed using primary and then secondary antibodies. The primary antibodies were as follows: rabbit anti-GAPDH, TIMP3 Antibody, CTSS Antibody and TLR7 Antibody. The blots were visualized with ECL reagent.

Results

DEmRNAs and DEmiRNAs between patients with OA and normal controls

Expression profiling of mRNA and miRNA extracted from five patients with OA and three normal controls identified 1068 DEmRNAs (516 up-regulated and 552 down-regulated DEmRNAs) and 21 DEmiRNAs (6 up-regulated and 15 down-regulated DEmiRNAs). The top 10 up- and down-regulated DEmRNAs and all DEmiRNAs were showed in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively. Hierarchical clustering analysis of top 50 up- and down-regulated DEmRNAs and DEmiRNAs was displayed in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, respectively. The raw-data have been uploaded to Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (GSE143514, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE143514).

Table 2.

Top 10 up- and down-regulated DEmRNAs between patients with OA and normal controls

ID Symbol log2FC p-value Regulation
91,937 TIMD4 3.81464 5.00E-05 up
57,152 SLURP1 3.86063 0.0037 up
27,344 PCSK1N 3.93602 0.00065 up
55,600 ITLN1 4.00229 0.0016 up
25,791 NGEF 4.17476 5.00E-05 up
140,578 CHODL 4.2872 0.01285 up
100,423,062 IGLL5 4.79462 0.0298 up
1446 CSN1S1 5.81655 5.00E-05 up
91,937 TIMD4 3.81464 5.00E-05 up
57,152 SLURP1 3.86063 0.0037 up
4316 MMP7 −7.00868 0.00845 down
8862 APLN −5.19773 5.00E-05 down
3381 IBSP −4.29821 0.00195 down
54,360 CYTL1 −4.23704 5.00E-05 down
6781 STC1 −4.21422 5.00E-05 down
3569 IL6 −4.15517 5.00E-05 down
4321 MMP12 −4.03152 0.0094 down
90,249 UNC5A −3.84362 0.03125 down
7980 TFPI2 −3.81017 0.0099 down
7941 PLA2G7 −3.78853 0.02245 down

DEmRNAs Differentially expressed mRNAs, FC Fold change

Table 3.

DEmiRNAs between patients with OA and normal controls

miRNA|precursor baseMean log2FC p-value Regulation
hsa-miR-106a-5p|hsa-mir-106a 492.1284 −3.19961 0.000226 Down
hsa-miR-1246|hsa-mir-1246 258.1751 −2.0786 0.011492 Down
hsa-miR-144-3p|hsa-mir-144 17,728.54 −3.31783 0.049975 Down
hsa-miR-17-5p|hsa-mir-17 7597.817 −2.22172 0.004888 Down
hsa-miR-18b-5p|hsa-mir-18b 109.0147 −2.1827 0.012516 Down
hsa-miR-20b-5p|hsa-mir-20b 1693.174 −3.26326 0.000196 Down
hsa-miR-363-3p|hsa-mir-363 4384.713 −2.63676 0.000153 Down
hsa-miR-451a|hsa-mir-451a 5,294,654 −2.72244 0.005101 Down
hsa-miR-548ad-5p|hsa-mir-548ad 110.1592 −2.59423 0.000577 Down
hsa-miR-548ad-5p|hsa-mir-548ay 161.6666 −2.04144 0.001393 Down
hsa-miR-548ae-5p|hsa-mir-548ad 110.1592 −2.59423 0.000577 Down
hsa-miR-548ae-5p|hsa-mir-548ay 161.6666 −2.04144 0.001393 Down
hsa-miR-548ay-5p|hsa-mir-548ay 161.6666 −2.04144 0.001393 Down
hsa-miR-675-3p|hsa-mir-675 115.7026 −2.11926 0.001639 Down
hsa-miR-96-5p|hsa-mir-96 2277.136 −3.01869 0.000203 Down
hsa-miR-122-3p|hsa-mir-122 182.4923 8.118732 0.000981 Up
hsa-miR-122-5p|hsa-mir-122 2707.5 6.661302 2.67E-05 Up
hsa-miR-137|hsa-mir-137 351.0572 2.317024 0.002847 Up
hsa-miR-138-5p|hsa-mir-138-1 1356.231 2.898852 0.000224 Up
hsa-miR-138-5p|hsa-mir-138-2 307.7424 2.781289 0.000927 Up
hsa-miR-215-5p|hsa-mir-215 518.2554 5.316112 0.001199 Up

DEmiRNAs Differentially expressed miRNAs, FC Fold change

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The heatmap of top 50 up- and down-regulated DEmRNAs between OA and normal controls. Row and column represented DEmRNAs and tissue samples, respectively. The color scale represented the expression levels. The red and green color represented the up- and down-regulated

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The heatmap of DEmiRNAs between OA and normal controls. Row and column represented DEmiRNAs and tissue samples, respectively. The color scale represented the expression levels. The red and green color represented the up- and down-regulated

Functional annotation of DEmRNAs between patients with OA and normal controls

Protein phosphorylation (p = 1.84E-05), defense response to virus (p = 3.54E-05), positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter (p = 4.08E-05), extracellular space (p = 7.09E-24) and heparin binding (p = 2.03E-12) were significantly enriched GO terms in OA (Fig. 3a-c). Staphylococcus aureus infection (p = 5.90E-12), Leishmaniasis (p = 4.66E-11) and HTLV-I infection (p = 1.84E-08) were significantly enriched KEGG pathways in OA (Fig. 3d).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Significantly enriched GO terms and KEGG pathways of DEmRNAs between OA and normal controls. a. BP, biological process; b. CC, cellular component; c. MF, molecular function; d KEGG pathways. The x-axis shows counts of DEmRNAs enriched in GO terms or KEGG pathways and the y-axis shows GO terms or KEGG pathways. The color scale represented -lg p-value

DEmiRNA-target interactions

A total of 395 DEmiRNA-DEmRNA pairs, including 376 DEmiRNA-DEmRNA pairs which were predicted by ≥4 algorithms and 48 validated DEmiRNA-DEmRNA pairs derived from the miRWalk, were obtained (Fig. 4). Among which, hsa-miR-17-5p (degree = 62), hsa-miR-20b-5p (degree = 56) and hsa-miR-106a-5p (degree = 52) were the top three DEmiRNAs that covered most DEmRNAs.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

DEmiRNA-DEmRNA interaction network. a Interaction network between down-regulated DEmiRNAs and up-regulated DEmRNAs; b Interaction network between up-regulated DEmiRNAs and down-regulated DEmRNAs. The rhombic nodes and elliptical nodes indicate DEmiRNAs and DEmRNAs, respectively. Red and green color represent up-regulation and down-regulation, respectively.

Functional annotation of DEmiRNA targets

Base on GO enrichment analysis, RNA processing (p = 5.80E-04), response to activity (p = 9.04E-04), nucleus (p = 3.56E-04) and alpha-tubulin binding (p = 5.80E-04) were significantly enriched GO terms in OA (Fig. 5a-c). According to the KEGG pathway enrichment analysis, the DEmiRNA-target DEmRNAs were significantly enriched in Pathways in cancer (p = 3.36E-02) and PI3K-Akt signaling pathway (p = 4.67E-02) (Fig. 5d-e) [16].

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Significantly enriched GO terms and KEGG pathways of DEmiRNA-target DEmRNAs. a. BP, biological process; b. CC, cellular component; c. MF, molecular function. d-e KEGG pathways. d. PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. e. Pathways in cancer. The red and green rectangles represented the particles which regulated by the up- and down-regulated target DEmRNAs of DEmiRNAs, respectively. Appropriate copyright permission to use the signalling pathways was obtained

The results of qRT-PCR and western blot

Three DEmRNAs (including TLR7, CTSS and TIMP3) and two DEmiRNAs (including hsa-miR-17-5p and hsa-miR-20b-5p) were selected to use for qRT-PCR validation. Based on the results of RNA sequencing, TLR7, CTSS and TIMP3 were up-regulated while hsa-miR-17-5p and hsa-miR-20b-5p were down-regulated in OA. Except for TLR7, expression of the others in the qRT-PCR results was consistent with that in this present study, generally (Fig. 6a). Western blot results revealed that the protein level of CTSS and TIMP3 were up-regulated while the protein level of TLR7 was down-regulated in OA (Fig. 6b).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

The results of qRT-PCR and western blot. a. The quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) results of the DEmRNAs and DEmiRNAs in OA. The x-axis represents the DEmRNAs/DEmiRNAs and the y-axis represents log2 (fold change). b. Western blotting analysis of TLR7, CTSS and TIMP3 protein levels in OA and normal controls. GAPDH protein was used as the loading control

Discussion

OA is a progressive disease with a long silent period, which shows signs of cartilage degradation, mild-to-moderate synovial inflammation and altered bone structure, resulting in severe destruction and impaired function of the affected joints [17]. This study performed RNA-sequencing to attempt to obtain the key miRNAs and mRNAs associated with OA. Here, we discussed two DEmiRNAs (including hsa-miR-17-5p and hsa-miR-20b-5p), which were the top two DEmiRNAs that covered most DEmRNAs, and three DEmRNAs (including TLR7, CTSS and TIMP3), which were target genes of the two DEmiRNAs mentioned above.

Toll like receptor 7 (TLR7), a member of the Toll-like receptor (TLR) family, encoded by TLR7, plays a fundamental role in pathogen recognition and activation of innate immunity [18]. From Drosophila to humans, TLRs are highly conserved and share structural and functional similarities [18]. In humans, the TLR family, a set of 10 type I transmembrane receptors, have specificity for different types of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) [19]. PAMPs are expressed on infectious agents, and mediate the production of cytokines necessary for the development of effective immunity [19]. In humans, ten TLRs have been identified, and TLR-1, TLR-2, TLR-4, TLR-5, TLR-6, and TLR-10 are expressed on the cell surface while TLR-3, TLR-7, TLR-8, and TLR-9 are expressed in endosomes [20]. TLR-7 recognizes single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) in endosomes and is activated by the synthetic antiviral compound imiquimod [21]. TLR activation has been demonstrated to be involved in the development of synovitis, degeneration of cartilage, and susceptibility to disease in OA [22]. Chamberlain et al. suggested that the expression of TLR7 may be a predictor for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity and anti-TNFα responsiveness, and targeting TLR7 may suppress chronic progression of RA [23]. Mar et al. indicated that the expression level of TLR-7 was higher in OA fibroblast-like synoviocytes [24]. Due to TLR7 was found to be up-regulated in OA in our study, we speculated that TLR7 may involve in OA. However, down-regulated TLR7 was found in the results of qRT-PCR and western blot, its exact role in OA need to be confirmed in the further study.

CTSS (cathepsin S), encoded by CTSS, is a member of the peptidase C1 family [25]. In addition, CTSS is a lysosomal cysteine proteinase that may participate in the degradation of antigenic proteins to peptides for presentation on MHC class II molecules [25]. Appleton et al. identified increased expression of CTSS in the OA model [26]. The study of Lambert et al. showed that CTSS was significantly up-regulated in inflamed synovial biopsy samples which was confirmed at the protein level by using immunohistochemistry, and it was also significantly up-regulated in cartilage catabolism pathway based on their results [27]. In agreement with previous studies, we observed that CTSS was up-regulated in patients with OA which may imply the importance of CTSS in OA.

TIMP3 (full name, TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 3), is a member of TIMP family which is inhibitors of the matrix metalloproteinases, a group of peptidases implicated in degradation of the extracellular matrix (ECM) [28]. In bone, TIMP-3 plays the role as a local cytokine, regulating bone metabolism through suppressing osteoblast differentiation and inducing osteoblast apoptosis [29, 30]. TIMP3 was reported to be associated with RA and arthritis based on a search of the U. S. National Library of Medicine database (MEDLINE) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/IEB/Research/Acembly/av.cgi) [31]. A case-control study in a Chinese Han population linked TIMP3 polymorphism with severe knee OA [32]. In this study, TIMP3 was detected to be dysregulated in patients with OA. Hence, we hypothesized that TIMP3 was involved with OA.

Hsa-miR-17-92 polycistron encodes a cluster of seven miRNAs derived from the c-myc regulated c13orf25 locus at chromosome 13q31.3, including miR-17-5p [33]. MiR-17-5p was reported to have a role as a tumor suppressor in breast cancer cells and as a key regulator of the G1/S phase cell cycle transition [7, 34]. MiR-17-5p may act as an oncogene or a tumor suppressor in different cellular contexts [7]. Although no report linked hsa-miR-17-5p with OA, it was a down-regulated miRNA that covered most DEmRNAs in this study. In addition, TLR7, CTSS and TIMP3 were detected to be target genes of hsa-miR-17-5p. Given the results of our analysis, we hypothesized that hsa-miR-17-5p may participate in OA by regulating TLR7, CTSS and TIMP3.

MiR-20b-5p is transcribed from the miR-106a~ 363 clusters which is reported to be involved in several process [35]. Ma et al. suggested that miR-20b-5p may play a vital role in multiple sclerosis (MS) pathogenesis [36]. In the study of Luo et al., miR-20b-5p was found to play role in promoting myoblast differentiation and repressing myoblast proliferation [35]. Interestingly, hsa-miR-20b-5p was down-regulated in patients with OA. In addition, TLR7 and CTSS were targeted by hsa-miR-20b-5p which indicated that miR-20b-5p may implicate in OA. To our best knowledge, we are the first to report the role of hsa-miR-20b-5p in OA.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we identified 1068 DEmRNAs (516 up-regulated and 552 down-regulated DEmRNAs), 21 DEmiRNAs (6 up-regulated and 15 down-regulated DEmiRNAs) and 395 DEmiRNA-DEmRNA pairs in synovial tissues of patients with OA, and emphasized the importance of several mRNAs and miRNAs which may implicate in OA. These findings may provide new avenue to understand the mechanism of OA. A limitation of present study is the small sample size for RNA sequencing. The exact function of these mRNAs and miRNAs in OA need to be determined with further large sample research.

Supplementary information

12881_2020_978_MOESM1_ESM.tif (1.1MB, tif)

Additional file 1 : Figure S1 Flow chart of the analyses.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

CTSS

Cathepsin S

DEmiRNA

Differentially expressed miRNA

DEmRNA

Differentially expressed mRNA

ECM

Extracellular matrix

EDTA

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

FPKM

Per million fragments mapped

GO

Gene Ontology

KEGG

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

OA

Osteoarthritis

PAMPs

Pathogen-associated molecular patterns

PCR

Polymerase chain reaction

PPI

Protein-protein interaction network

RA

Rheumatoid arthritis

RIN

RNA integrity number

ssRNA

Single-stranded RNA

TIMP3

TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 3

TLR7

Toll like receptor 7

Authors’ contributions

YZ, ZW, XC, JZ, LY and SL analyzed and interpreted the data. YZ and ZW were major contributors in writing the manuscript. YL designed the project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by Scientific Research Project of Sichuan Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission of China (17ZD023) and 2018 Science and Technology Plan Projects of Deyang City (2018SZS091). The funding body had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The raw-data have been uploaded to Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (GSE143514, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE143514).

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethical committee of People’s Hospital of Deyang City. Written informed consent for use of their samples from every participant were provided in the present study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Yu Zhou and Zhicong Wang contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Xi Chen, Email: cxchenxi007@163.com.

Yuehong Liu, Email: liuyuehong_doctor@163.com.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s12881-020-0978-5.

References

  • 1.Pereira D, Ramos E, Branco J. Osteoarthritis. Acta Medica Port. 2015;28(1):99–106. doi: 10.20344/amp.5477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mendel OI, Luchihina LV, Mendel W. Aging and osteoarthritis. Chronic nonspecific inflammation as a link between aging and osteoarthritis (a review) Adv Gerontol. 2015;5(4):252–260. doi: 10.1134/S2079057015040165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fernández-Torres J, Zamudio-Cuevas Y, López-Reyes A, Garrido-Rodríguez D, Martínez-Flores K, Lozada CA, et al. Gene–gene interactions of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in knee osteoarthritis. Molecular Biology Reports. 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Goldring MB, Otero M. Inflammation in osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2011;23(5):471–478. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e328349c2b1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kolhe R, Hunter M, Liu S, Jadeja RN, Pundkar C, Mondal AK, et al. Gender-specific differential expression of exosomal miRNA in synovial fluid of patients with osteoarthritis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):2029. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01905-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ren YM, Zhao X, Yang T, Duan YH, Sun YB, Zhao WJ, et al. Exploring the key genes and pathways of osteoarthritis in knee cartilage in a rat model using gene expression profiling. Yonsei Med J. 2018;59(6):760. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.6.760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cloonan N, Brown MK, Steptoe AL, Wani S, Chan LW, Forrest AR, et al. The miR-17-5p microRNA is a key regulator of the G1/S phase cell cycle transition. Genome Biol. 2008;9(8):1–14. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-8-r127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lee RC, Feinbaum RL, Ambros V. The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell. 1993;75(5):843. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90529-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nugent M. MicroRNAs: exploring new horizons in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2016;24(4):573–580. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shigeru M, Hiroshi A. Macro view of microRNA function in osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012;8(9):543. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2012.128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang Y, Wu N, Liu J, Wu Z, Dong D. FusionCancer: a database of cancer fusion genes derived from RNA-seq data. Diagn Pathol. 2015;10:131. doi: 10.1186/s13000-015-0310-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Karlsson C, Dehne T, Lindahl A, Brittberg M, Pruss A, Sittinger M, et al. Genome-wide expression profiling reveals new candidate genes associated with osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2010;18(4):581–592. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Murata K, Yoshitomi H, Tanida S, Ishikawa M, Nishitani K, Ito H, et al. Plasma and synovial fluid microRNAs as potential biomarkers of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(3):R86. doi: 10.1186/ar3013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Christian B, Anna Z, Neng-Yu L, Arnd K, Carlo P, Annamaria I, et al. Signature of circulating microRNAs in osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(3):e18. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and therapeutic criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum. 1986;29(8):1039–1049. doi: 10.1002/art.1780290816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Furumichi M, Morishima K, Tanabe M. New approach for understanding genome variations in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D590–D5d5. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Goldring MB, Goldring SR. Articular cartilage and subchondral bone in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1192:230–237. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05240.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Delneste Y, Beauvillain C, Jeannin P. Innate immunity: structure and function of TLRs. Med Sci. 2007;23(1):67–73. doi: 10.1051/medsci/200723167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gómez R, Villalvilla A, Largo R, Gualillo O, Herrero-Beaumont G. TLR4 signalling in osteoarthritis-finding targets for candidate DMOADs. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015;11(3):159–170. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Beutler B. Inferences, questions and possibilities in toll-like receptor signalling. Nature. 2004;430(6996):257–263. doi: 10.1038/nature02761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Courtney W, Michael G. Recognition of viruses by cytoplasmic sensors. Curr Opin Immunol. 2010;22(1):41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2009.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Scanzello CR, Goldring SR. The role of synovitis in osteoarthritis pathogenesis. Bone. 2012;51(2):249–257. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chamberlain ND, Seung-Jae K, Vila OM, Volin MV, Suncica V, Pope RM, et al. Ligation of TLR7 by rheumatoid arthritis synovial fluid single strand RNA induces transcription of TNFα in monocytes. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(3):418–426. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mar C, Yasmina J, Selene PG, Rebeca J, Pablos JL, Gomariz RP, et al. RNA sensors in human osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts: immune regulation by vasoactive intestinal peptide. Arthritis Rheum. 2014;63(6):1626–1636. doi: 10.1002/art.30294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hsing LC, Rudensky AY. The lysosomal cysteine proteases in MHC class II antigen presentation. Immunol Rev. 2005;207:229–241. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00310.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Appleton CTG, Pitelka V, Henry J, Beier F. Global analyses of gene expression in early experimental osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;56(6):1854–1868. doi: 10.1002/art.22711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lambert C, Dubuc JE, Montell E, Vergés J, Munaut C, Noël A, et al. Gene expression pattern of synovial cells from inflammatory and normal areas of osteoarthritis synovial membrane. Arthritis Rheum. 2014;66(4):960–968. doi: 10.1002/art.38315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Troeberg L, Lazenbatt C, Anower EKMF, Freeman C, Federov O, Habuchi H, et al. Sulfated glycosaminoglycans control the extracellular trafficking and the activity of the metalloprotease inhibitor TIMP-3. Chem Biol. 2014;21(10):1300–1309. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Han B, Wang HC, Li H, Tao YQ, Liang CZ, Li FC, et al. Nucleus pulposus mesenchymal stem cells in acidic conditions mimicking degenerative intervertebral discs give better performance than adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Cells Tissues Organs. 2014;199(5–6):342. doi: 10.1159/000369452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yuan LQ, Liu YS, Luo XH, Guo LJ, Xie H, Lu Y, et al. Recombinant tissue metalloproteinase inhibitor-3 protein induces apoptosis of murine osteoblast MC3T3-E1. Amino Acids. 2008;35(1):123–127. doi: 10.1007/s00726-007-0614-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tong Z, Liu Y, Chen B, Yan L, Hao D. Association between MMP3 and TIMP3 polymorphisms and risk of osteoarthritis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(48):83563–83569. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Su SL, Yang HY, Lee HS, Huang GS, Lee CH, Liu WS, et al. Gene-gene interactions between TGF-Î2/Smad3 signalling pathway polymorphisms affect susceptibility to knee osteoarthritis. BMJ Open. 2015;5(6):e007931. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lin H. J Michael T, Michael T H, Eva H-M, David M, summer G, et al. A microRNA polycistron as a potential human oncogene. Nature. 2005;435(7043):828–833. doi: 10.1038/nature03552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Anwar H, Macus TK, Grady FS. Mir-17-5p regulates breast cancer cell proliferation by inhibiting translation of AIB1 mRNA. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26(21):8191–8201. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00242-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wen L, Li G, Yi Z, Nie Q, Zhang X. E2F1-miR-20a-5p/20b-5p auto-regulatory feedback loop involved in myoblast proliferation and differentiation. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27904. doi: 10.1038/srep27904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Xinting M, Juhua Z, Yin Z, Linlin J, Ping M, Yanmin L, et al. Expression, regulation and function of microRNAs in multiple sclerosis. Int J Med Sci. 2014;11(8):810. doi: 10.7150/ijms.8647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

12881_2020_978_MOESM1_ESM.tif (1.1MB, tif)

Additional file 1 : Figure S1 Flow chart of the analyses.

Data Availability Statement

The raw-data have been uploaded to Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (GSE143514, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE143514).


Articles from BMC Medical Genetics are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES