Abstract
A 71-year-old male who presented with right upper quadrant pain was found to have hepatic angiosarcoma. We briefly review the epidemiology, presentation, imaging findings, and pathological diagnosis of hepatic angiosarcoma.
Keywords: hepatic angiosarcoma, hepatic tumors
Introduction
Hepatic angiosarcoma, although rare, is the third most common primary liver malignancy. We present a case of a 71-year-old-male who presented with right upper quadrant pain and subsequently diagnosed with hepatic angiosarcoma during admission. We briefly discuss the epidemiology, imaging characteristics, and pathological diagnosis of hepatic angiosarcoma.
Case presentation
A 71-year-old male with a remote history of prostate cancer and diabetes presented with a one-week history of gradually worsening right upper quadrant abdominal pain. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan (Figure 1) was obtained in the emergency department, which revealed a large multifocal and diffusely enhancing mass within the liver. Laboratory workup revealed a slightly elevated aspartate aminotransferase, but was otherwise unremarkable. Tumor markers, including carcinoembryonic antigen, alpha fetoprotein, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9, were negative. The patient was subsequently admitted for further evaluation.
Figure 1. Representative CT images.
Contrast-enhanced CT images in the axial (A) and coronal (B) planes demonstrate a diffusely enhancing, multifocal, heterogeneous, and infiltrative mass occupying most of the hepatic parenchyma. Mild capsular retraction (arrows) is noted secondary to the mass at the periphery of the liver. CT findings are highly concerning for a primary or metastatic hepatic malignancy.
Magnetic resonance (MR) images obtained during admission showed a multifocal, predominantly T2 hyperintense hepatic mass, with heterogeneous enhancement and areas of necrosis (Figure 2). Further imaging workup was negative for signs of extrahepatic metastatic disease.
Figure 2. Representative MRI images.
Multiple axial MR images. (A) T2-weighted image demonstrates a largely T2 hyperintense infiltrative mass occupying the hepatic parenchyma (arrows) with scattered regions of T2 hypointensity likely representing necrosis (arrowhead). (B) The diffusion-weighted MR image demonstrates restricted diffusion throughout the mass-corresponding apparent diffusion coefficient images demonstrate hypointensity confirming diffusion restriction (arrows). (C) Precontrast T1-weighted MR image demonstrates relative hypointense signal in the region of the mass (arrows). (D) Gadolinium contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image demonstrates diffuse enhancement with regions of non-enhancement corresponding to the areas of necrosis (arrowhead).
Results from a liver core biopsy (Figure 3) demonstrate abnormal hepatic architecture with freely anastomosing vasculature and large, abnormal CD31+ endothelial cells surrounding small groups of hepatocytes-findings consistent with hepatic angiosarcoma.
Figure 3. Representative pathology slides from a liver core biopsy.
(A) Low-power view of the patient’s liver biopsy showing the abnormal architecture of freely anastomosing vascular channels (arrows). (B) Small groups of hepatocytes (arrowhead) surrounded by large abnormal endothelial cells (arrow). (C) CD31 stain highlighting the abnormal endothelial cells (representative area within square). (D) Increased MIB-1 proliferation index noted in the endothelial cells (arrow) and not in the hepatocytes (arrowhead).
Discussion
Hepatic angiosarcoma is the most common primary mesenchymal tumor of the liver and the third most common primary liver malignancy [1]. Hepatic angiosarcoma is a rare malignancy that accounts for less than 2% of all primary liver malignancies and appears more frequently in male patients older than 60 years of age [2]. Patients are typically asymptomatic until later stages of disease when they may present with abdominal pain or hemoptysis due to pulmonary metastasis. Patients who previously received thorium dioxide (Thorotrast) for imaging studies are at increased risk of developing hepatic angiosarcoma [3]. Additionally, occupational exposures to vinyl chloride monomer and arsenic are known to induce its formation.
On multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT and MR exams, hepatic angiosarcoma commonly appears as a multifocal tumor with variable enhancement patterns [2]. It is important to appreciate that hepatic angiosarcoma may share imaging characteristics with more common hepatic tumors. However, some differentiating characteristics do exist. For example, hepatic angiosarcoma with peripheral nodular enhancement can be distinguished from hemangioma by a lack of slow centripetal filling on delayed images [4]. Also, the poorly differentiated cells of hepatic angiosarcoma are less likely to retain hepatobiliary MR contrast agents to the extent of focal nodular hyperplasia [5-7].
On pathological analysis, hepatic angiosarcoma displays infiltrative vascular channels lined by atypical endothelial cells [8-10]. Lesions are typically multifocal, aggressive, and prone to hemorrhage which pose specific challenges against creating an efficacious treatment regimen. Short interval follow-up can be helpful for ambiguous lesions that do not meet criteria for biopsy.
Conclusions
Hepatic angiosarcoma is a rare entity that is difficult to distinguish from most other hepatic tumors and requires a pathological diagnosis. There are certain imaging characteristics, however, which may necessitate the inclusion of this entity on the differential for a hepatic mass.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained by all participants in this study
References
- 1.Hepatic angiosarcoma: a challenging diagnosis. Averbukh LD, Mavilia MG, Einstein MM. Cureus. 2018;10:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Angiosarcoma: clinical and imaging features from head to toe. Gaballah AH, Jensen CT, Palmquist S, et al. Br J Radiol. 2017;90:20170039. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Primary hepatic angiosarcoma. Chaudhary P, Bhadana U, Singh RA, Ahuja A. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41:1137–1143. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Primary hepatic angiosarcoma and potential treatment options. Zheng YW, Zhang XW, Zhang JL, et al. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29:906–911. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Contrast uptake in primary hepatic angiosarcoma on gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the hepatobiliary phase. Hayashi M, Kawana S, Sekino H, et al. World J Hepatol. 2018;10:166–171. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v10.i1.166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Angiosarcoma of the liver: imaging of a rare salient entity. Thapar S, Rastogi A, Ahuja A, Sarin S. J Radiol Case Rep. 2014;8:24–32. doi: 10.3941/jrcr.v8i8.1693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Imaging findings of primary hepatic angiosarcoma on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced liver MRI: comparison with hepatic haemangiomas of similar size. Kim B, Byun JH, Lee JH, et al. Clin Radiol. 2018;73:244–253. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liver angiosarcoma, a rare liver malignancy presented with intraabdominal bleeding due to rupture: a case report. Chien CY, Hwang CC, Yeh C, et al. World J Surg Oncol. 2012;10:23. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-10-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Primary hepatic angiosarcoma: a report of two cases and literature review. Zhu YP, Chen YM, Matro E, et al. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:6088–6096. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.6088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Arsenic, vinyl chloride, viral hepatitis, and hepatic angiosarcoma: a hospital-based study and review of literature in Taiwan. Huang NC, Wann SR, Chang HT, Lin SL, Wang JS, Guo HR. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011;11:142. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-11-142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



