Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2016 Feb 7;8(2):e483. doi: 10.7759/cureus.483

Embolization of Carotid Body Tumors: Revisiting Direct Puncture Technique, Preliminary Experience and Literature Review

Daniel R Felbaum 1,, Hasan R Syed 1, Michael F McCullough 2, Rocco A Armonda 1, Ai-Hsi Liu 2, Randy S Bell 3
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC7053799  PMID: 32175212

Abstract

Preoperative embolization via transarterial route is an acceptable adjunct to the treatment of carotid body tumors (CBT). Direct tumor puncture for embolization has been previously described as a safe and feasible option. We revisit this technique and present our initial experience treating CBT via direct puncture.

We identified six patients that underwent preoperative embolization of CBT using a direct puncture technique embolized with Onyx (EV3 Micro Therapeutics Inc., Irvine, CA, USA). After defining the angioarchitecture via digital subtraction angiography, the tumor was targeted with Onyx. Using a 21-gauge needle, the tumor was punctured using a fluoroscopic road mask. There were no immediate post-procedural complications following embolization. All patients underwent definitive resection within 24 hours. During surgery, the embolization material did not affect surgical maneuvers. In addition, the estimated blood loss was noted to average 50 ml. 

Although early in our experience, direct percutaneous embolization of CBT appears to be a reproducible and well-tolerated endovascular treatment option. Overall, the reported body of evidence available confirms the safety and efficacy of direct intralesional embolization with Onyx.

Keywords: carotid body tumors, direct puncture, onyx, tumor embolization

Introduction

Endovascular therapy as an adjunct for treatment of vascular carotid body tumors (CBT) is well-established. The mainstay of therapy focuses on devascularization via the transarterial route, focusing mainly on the smaller branches of the external carotid artery. Although effective, the multiplicity and small caliber, highly tortuous arterial feeders make intervention more complex and time-consuming [1-2]. Earlier case reports employ n-BCA while more recent studies employ Onyx (EV3 Micro Therapeutics, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) Employing intratumoral injection of an embolic agent has overall safely allowed near complete devascularization of these complex tumors [1-7].

Case presentation

Methods

A retrospective chart review identified a series of six patients that had undergone direct intratumoral embolization therapy. Informed consent was obtained prior to any therapy. The series included five females and one male, and the average age of the patient was 62.6 years (range: 50-78). The average Shamblin score was 3.

Technique

Percutaneous or direct tumor puncture for intralesional embolization has been described in detail elsewhere [2, 8-9]. We have maintained this technique in our practice. In brief, a carotid occlusion test is initially performed in case of the need for the sacrifice of the carotid artery. Upon completion, the patient undergoes general anesthesia, is kept in the supine position with the head rotated 30 degrees towards the contralateral shoulder, and antibiotics are administered. Using digital subtraction angiography, the angioarchitecture of the carotid tumor is identified. Next, a 21-gauge needle is inserted in a safe distance within the lesion itself and confirmed with intralesional angiography. Slow, continuous backflow of blood through the needle confirms appropriate location. Afterward, Onyx-18 (ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer) is injected under road mask fluoroscopy after standard preparation with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). With tactile feedback, the intratumoral injection can be felt to have decreased penetration and repeat angiography can be performed to evaluate further treatment. If necessary, the spinal needle trajectory can be repositioned for further treatment.

Results

The mean fluoroscopy time was 39.5 minutes. The average amount of injected Onxy-34 was 2.98 ml. The extent of tumor devascularization was at least 70% in all cases, or a subtotal treatment session. Patients were monitored in surgical step-down unit with frequent neuro checks. There were no cases of airway compromise, inadvertent arterial embolization, or neurologic sequelae from the procedure.

Case illustration

A 66-year-old right-handed female presented with a progressively enlarging left neck mass, consistent of a carotid body tumor. After a carotid balloon test occlusion was performed in the usual manner [10], the patient was intubated using general anesthesia. The left neck was anesthetized, prepped, and draped in the standard sterile manner. The lesion is defined in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Digital subtraction angiography in AP projection revealing a vascularized carotid body lesion.

Figure 1

Using fluoroscopy, a 20-gauge needle was used to puncture the lesion under fluoroscopy, and a slow steady blood flow return confirmed the appropriate location (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Unsubtracted parenchymogram of the lesion confirming needle position.

Figure 2

The needle was connected to tubing after being purged with DMSO. Onyx-34 was then injected under live fluoroscopic guidance after a parenchymogram was completed to serve as a baseline (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Parenchymogram in mid-arterial phase reconfirming the appropriate location of the needle.

Figure 3

The needle was adjusted, as previously described, to attain the targeted amount of embolization. A total of 3.5 ml of Onyx-34 was injected to achieve an approximately 80% devascularization (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Digital subtraction angiography of the common carotid artery after treatment with Onyx revealing significant reduction in vascularity with preservation of the parent arteries.

Figure 4

A post-procedure Allura XPER FD20 CT (Philips Medical Systems, Netherlands) was completed, revealing the Onyx mass (Figure 5).

Figure 5. Post-treatment axial XPER CT detailing the Onyx mass within the tumor.

Figure 5

Discussion

Using preoperative embolization as an adjunct to surgery facilitates a less morbid and safer operation [11-12]. The goal of this study is to add to the growing body of literature regarding this neuro-interventional technique. Casasco, et al. first described direct devascularization of head and neck tumors in 1994 [13-14]. Prior to this, direct transarterial embolization was the favored treatment modality. Since then, there have been more widely available embolic agents. Initial reports employed n-butyl cyanoacrylate (n-BCA), but more recently, Onyx has been used with success as well [1-2, 4, 6-7, 15-16]. In almost all cases employing Onyx, by utilizing strict adherence to technique as well as aiming for near-complete devascularization, there have been few complications associated with this procedure. Major complications that can be associated with this technique can be an inadvertent migration of embolization agent, chemical toxicity, or cranial nerve palsies. In reviewing published case series regarding direct intralesional embolization, one patient developed Horner’s syndrome and lower cranial nerve palsies [16]. In most other published series, there have been no untoward events related to the direct intralesional embolization employing Onyx. It is our preference to have an objective of subtotal or near complete devascularization as the goal of intervention. In particular, we are more aggressive with the superior portion of the tumor, as this is more distant from the carotid bifurcation and cranial nerves present in the caudal aspect.  In addition, the improved safety profile may be due to characteristics inherent to Onyx. Specifically, Onyx has a more uniform and definite composition which facilitates a safer and more controlled intralesional injection. Also, direct visual feedback during injection allows the operator to cease injection immediately. Additionally, balloon occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) is not necessary during intralesional therapy to safely perform direct puncture embolization therapy [1-2, 6-9, 17]. The results of available literature are summarized in Table 1. In all case series employing direct puncture therapy as an adjunct to surgical treatment, the use of Onyx facilitated resection by delineating the boundary of the tumor.

Table 1. Summary of studies utilizing Onyx for direct puncture of carotid body tumors or paragangliomas.

Direct Puncture of Carotid Body Tumors or Paragangliomas Using Onyx
Authors Patients Fluoro Time % Devascularization Balloon Use Onyx Amount Complications
Elhammady 2009 1 20 minutes 100% No 5.0 ml None
Wanke 2009 6 19.45 minutes 100% Yes 4.75 ml None
Ulrich 2009 1 N/A 100% No 9.0 ml None
Wiegand 2010 1 N/A 100% Yes 20.0 ml CN 12 and 9 edema Horner's
Ozyer 2010 1 N/A 90% No 7.5 ml None
Martinez-Galdamez 2011 6 N/A >95% No 7.0 ml None
Shah 2012 7 23 minutes 100% No 8.7 ml None
Elhammady 2012 18 40 minutes 87% No 8.4ml None
Griandzde 2013 10 N/A 98% No N/A None

Conclusions

A review of the available literature for direct intralesional embolization of carotid body tumors reveals a safe and effective manner of tumor devascularization to facilitate open surgery. In addition, the reported complication rates from using Onyx for this technique have been minimal. Our own preliminary experience echoes and adds to the current body of literature regarding direct intralesional therapy.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained by all participants in this study

References

  • 1.Preoperative onyx embolization of vascular head and neck tumors by direct puncture. Elhammady MS, Peterson EC, Johnson JN, Aziz-Sultan MA. World Neurosurg. 2012;77:725–730. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.02.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Direct percutaneous embolization of a carotid body tumor with Onyx. Elhammady MS, Farhat H, Ziayee H, Aziz-Sultan MA. J Neurosurg. 2009;110:124–127. doi: 10.3171/2008.4.17513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Intratumoral injection of cyanoacrylate glue in head and neck paragangliomas. Abud DG, Mounayer C, Benndorf G, Piotin M, Spelle L, Moret J. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25:1457–1462. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Preoperative embolization of carotid body tumor by direct percutaneous intratumoral injection of N-butyl cyanoacrylate glue assisted with balloon protection technique. Yang TH, Ou CH, Yang MS, Lee YC, Yeh LR. J Chin Med Assoc. 2011;74:91–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2011.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Early side effects after embolization of a carotid body tumor using Onyx. Wiegand S, Kureck I, Chapot R, Sesterhenn AM, Bien S, Werner JA. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:742–745. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Direct percutaneous embolization of a carotid body tumor with Onyx (Article in German) Ulrich S, Lehmann M, Ebmeyer J, Hamberger U, Reineke U, Dietrich U, Sudhoff H. HNO. 2009;57:1305–1310. doi: 10.1007/s00106-009-1960-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Devascularization of head and neck paragangliomas by direct percutaneous embolization. Ozyer U, Harman A, Yildirim E, Aytekin C, Akay TH, Boyvat F. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010;33:967–975. doi: 10.1007/s00270-010-9803-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Preliminary experience with the percutaneous embolization of paragangliomas at the carotid bifurcation using only ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH) Onyx. Shah HM, Gemmete JJ, Chaudhary N, Pandey AS, Ansari SA. J Neurointerv Surg. 2012;4:125–129. doi: 10.1136/jnis.2010.003970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Percutaneous embolization of carotid paragangliomas using solely Onyx. Wanke I, Jäckel MC, Goericke S, Panagiotopoulos V, Dietrich U, Forsting M. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1594–1597. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Intracranial endovascular balloon test occlusion: indications, methods, and predictive value. Elias AE, Chaudhary N, Pandey AS, Gemmete JJ. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2013;23:695–702. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2013.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Carotid body tumor surgery: management and outcomes in the nation. Vogel TR, Mousa AY, Dombrovskiy VY, Haser PB, Graham AM. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2009;43:457–461. doi: 10.1177/1538574409335274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Adjunct endovascular interventions in carotid body tumors. Economopoulos KP, Tzani A, Reifsnyder T. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:1081–1091. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.01.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Devascularization of craniofacial tumors by percutaneous tumor puncture. Casasco A, Herbreteau D, Houdart E, George B, Tran Ba Huy P, Deffresne D, Merland JJ. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;15:1233–1239. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Intratumoral embolization of intracranial and extracranial tumors: Technical note. George B, Casasco A, Deffrennes D, Houdart E. Neurosurgery. 1994;35:771–774. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199410000-00031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Direct percutaneous embolization of a carotid body tumor with n-butyl cyanoacrylate: an alternative method to endovascular embolization. Harman M, Etlik O, Unal O. Acta Radiol. 2004;45:646–648. doi: 10.1080/02841850410006759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Early side effects after embolization of a carotid body tumor using Onyx. Wiegand S, Kureck I, Chapot R, Sesterhenn AM, Bien S, Werner JA. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:742–745. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Percutaneous Onyx embolization of cervical paragangliomas. Martínez-Galdámez M, Saura P, Cenjor C, Pérez Higueras A. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22:1271–1274. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES