Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 9.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020 Feb 3;59(11):4304–4308. doi: 10.1002/anie.201914221

Versatile Glycosyl Sulfonates in β-Selective C-Glycosylation

Jesse Ling [a], Clay S Bennett [a]
PMCID: PMC7054165  NIHMSID: NIHMS1066603  PMID: 31880395

Abstract

C-Glycosides are both a common motif in many bioactive natural products and important glycoside mimetics. Here we demonstrate that activating a hemiacetal with a sulfonyl chloride, followed by treating the resultant glycosyl sulfonate with an enolate results in the stereospecific construction of β-linked C-glycosides. This reaction tolerates a range of acceptors and donors, including disaccharides. The resulting products can be readily derivatized into C-glycoside analogs of β-glycoconjugates, including C-disaccharide mimetics.

Keywords: carbohydrate, C-glycosides, diastereoselectivity, C-glycosylation, glycosyl sulfonate

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1066603-f0001.jpg

Alkyl C-glycosides are readily prepared from bench-stable hemiacetals via a glycosyl sulfonate intermediate. This SN2-like C-glycosylation generates β-anomers exclusively. The resulting products undergo facile derivatization into various C-glycoside mimetics of β-linked glycoconjugates.


Glycoconjugates are involved in numerous vital biological functions, ranging from intercellular recognition and the immune response to modulating the bioactivity of natural products.[1] While they hold promise as new therapeutic leads and tools for diagnosis, the inherent instability of many of these species has limited their utility. Specifically, the glycosidic linkages in many of these molecules are susceptible to hydrolysis in vivo. One approach that has been developed to overcome this instability involves replacing the glycosidic bonds with non-hydrolyzable C–C bonds. The resulting C-glycosides can act as a robust surrogate of the native O-glycoconjugate.[2] Indeed, previous studies have shown that these C-glycosides can even produce enhanced activities compared to the parent compounds.[3]

One important class of C-glycoconjugates are β-C-alkyl glycosides, which are an important component of both natural products, and many pharmaceutical compounds.[4] We are particularly interested in C-homoacyl and C-acyl glycosides, as they can be modified into a variety of glycoconjugate surrogates.[5] C-acyl glycosides are also present in some natural products, for example in the scleropentaside family.[6] Compared to C-aryl glycosides, however, the stereoselective construction of β-C-alkyl glycosides is challenging. Lewis acid-catalyzed glycosylation reactions with carbon nucleophiles typically favour the formation of α-isomers,[4c, 7] which require additional steps to be epimerized to the β-anomers.[8] The stereochemical outcome and efficiency of C-glycoside synthesis using other methods, including Knoevenagel condensation,[3e, 4b, 9] Mitsunobu reaction,[10] and Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons olefination/Michael addition cascade[11] of unprotected/peracylated sugars, are highly dependent on substrates and reaction conditions (Scheme 1A). For instance, while the condensation of glucose with acetylacetone proceeds with excellent yield, similar reactions with aryl β-diketones are much lower yielding.[3e] Alternatively, C-acyl glycosides have been prepared by transition metal coupling,[5i, 12] and Corey–Seebach reaction[13] with excellent β-selectivity. These approaches require an excess of heavy metals, or strongly oxidizing conditions to unmask the desired products. Radical-based methods[14] or indirect synthesis through other intermediates such as glycosyl nitriles[15] and benzothiazole[16] have also been reported, but they require extra steps or suffer from low stereoselectivity. Thus, a reliable, unified approach for the direct preparation of these β-C-alkyl glycosides has yet to be achieved.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Methods for the formation of β-C-homoacyl and C-acyl glycosides.

Recently, our group has demonstrated that glycosyl sulfonates, obtained in situ from hemiacetals, undergo highly β-selective glycosylation reactions, provided that the reactivity of the sulfonate and donor are matched.[17] One major advantage of this approach is that the electronics of the sulfonate are readily tunable, permitting SN2 glycosylations with donors that span a range of reactivities.[18] We envisioned that using strong carbon nucleophiles (e.g. enolate) in this reaction would permit β-selective C-glycosylation reactions (Scheme 1C). At the outset, we were aware that the ambident nucleophilicity and substantially higher basicity of enolates could pose a challenge. Nevertheless, we started our investigation of C-glycosylation using acetophenone and perbenzylated glucose donor 1a as the model system (Table 1). On the basis of our previous studies,[17d] we opted to use 3,5-bistrifluromethylbenzenesulfonyl chloride (R = A) as the promoter. We initially examined lithium and zinc enolate in order to minimize the formation of O-alkylation product, but they prove to be ineffective nucleophiles (Entries 1–3). Gratifyingly, the corresponding sodium enolate provided a moderate yield of desired product 2 along with minor O-glycoside 3 (Entry 4). Importantly, both products were obtained exclusively as β-anomers. After optimizing the temperature and solvent (Entries 5–11), we observed that reactions at −30 °C in THF/toluene afford the highest yield of 2. We also investigated the electronic properties of the sulfonate group (Entries 12–15); however, 3,5-bistrifluromethylbenzenesulfonyl chloride proved to be the optimal promoter for 1a. Increasing the stoichiometry of base to promote complete deprotonation for acetophenone led to a slight increase in the yield, while reducing the amount of the unwanted O-glycoside byproduct (Entry 16). These conditions were used for the remainder of our study.

Table 1.

Optimization of C-glycosylation of donor 1a and acetophenone.[a]

graphic file with name nihms-1066603-t0006.jpg
Entry M[b] Co-solvent Temp. (°C) R % Yield[c] of 2 and 3
1 Li/Li THF −30 A 0/0
2 Na/Li THF −30 A 27/15
3 Na/Zn[d] THF −30 A 0/0
4 Na/Na THF −30 A 52/11
5 Na/Na PhMe −30 A 58/13
6 Na/Na Et2O −30 A 45/13
7 Na/Na DME −30 A 45/15
8 Na/Na n-hexane −30 A 58/5
9 Na/Na PhMe −10 A 48/15
10 Na/Na PhMe −50 A 47/0
11 Na/Na PhMe −78 A 9/0
12[e] Na/Na PhMe −30 4-Ns 25/4
13[e] Na/Na PhMe −10 4-Ns 14/4
14[f] Na/Na PhMe −10 Ts 12/0
15[f] Na/Na THF 0 B 12/0
16[g] Na/Na PhMe 30 A 61/7
[a]

Reaction conditions: 1a (1 equiv.) and MN(SiMe3)2 (1.1 equiv.) was added to RSO2Cl (1.1 equiv.) in THF, temp., 1 h; then acetophenone (2 equiv.) and MN(SiMe3)2 (2.1 equiv.) in co-solvent, −78 °C to temp., 1–2 h.

[b]

M for 1a/M for acetophenone.

[c]

Isolated yields.

[d]

Generated from Na enolate and ZnCl2.

[e]

mixture of α/β anomers (~1:5).

[f]

mixture of α/β anomers (~1:1).

[g]

equiv. of acetophenone/NaHMDS = 1:2.

[g]

With the optimized conditions in hand, we proceed to study the substrate scope of acceptors with 1a (Table 2). In general, we were able to obtain moderate to good yields of C-glycosides, all of which were formed exclusively as β-anomers. Both electron donating (Entries 2 & 3) and withdrawing substituents (Entries 4–6) on the aryl ring of the enolate are well tolerated. We were initially concerned that the steric hindrance of ortho substituents would negatively affect the reaction; however, this proved not to be an issue (Entry 7). Enolates of heterocyclic ketones are well tolerated in the reaction (Entries 8 & 9), with 2-acylfuran being especially interesting as it can serve as a handle for further derivatization to a C-disaccharide through an Achmatowicz reaction (vide infra).[19] O-Glycosides were observed as a minor side product in many cases, all of which were formed exclusively as β-anomers. The isolation of these latter species was not always feasible owing to spontaneous hydrolysis under ambient conditions. We also examined the possible synthesis of C-acyl glycoside using (trimethylsilyloxy)phenylacetonitrile as the nucleophile. To our delight, the C-glycosylation of 1a proceeds smoothly to afford the desired C-acyl glycoside 18 in 56% yield (Entry 10) after desilylation under mild conditions. This success allows facile access to perbenzylated Scleropentaside A 19 in a single-step synthesis, using the corresponding furyl cyanohydrin (Entry 11).

Table 2.

C-glycosylation of glucose donor 1a[a]

graphic file with name nihms-1066603-t0008.jpg
Entry Acceptor Yield of C-glycoside[b] Yield of O-glycoside[b]
1 graphic file with name nihms-1066603-t0009.jpg 2 61% 3 7%
2 graphic file with name nihms-1066603-t0010.jpg 4 65% 5 6%
3 graphic file with name nihms-1066603-t0011.jpg 6 54% N.D.[c]
4 graphic file with name nihms-1066603-t0012.jpg 7 62% 8 11%
5 graphic file with name nihms-1066603-t0013.jpg 9 52% 10 7%
6 graphic file with name nihms-1066603-t0014.jpg 11 62% 12 17%
7 graphic file with name nihms-1066603-t0015.jpg 13 53% 14 11%
8 graphic file with name nihms-1066603-t0016.jpg 15 60% N.D.[c]
9 graphic file with name nihms-1066603-t0017.jpg 16 60% 0%
10[d] graphic file with name nihms-1066603-t0018.jpg 17 56% 0%
11[d] graphic file with name nihms-1066603-t0019.jpg 18 52% 0%
[a]

Reaction conditions: 1a (1 equiv.) and NaHMDS (1.1 equiv.) was added to RSO2Cl (1.1 equiv.) in THF, −30 °C, 1 h; then acceptor (2 equiv.) and NaHMDS (2.1–4 equiv.) in co-solvent, −78 °C to −30 °C., 1 h.

[b]

Isolated yields.

[c]

Not determined.

[d]

C-acyl glycosides 17 and 18 (after desilylation):

[d]

Other glycosyl donors also proved to be competent electrophiles in the reaction (Scheme 2). C-Glycosylations using perbenzylated galactose donor 1b proceed in moderate to good yields. Similarly, reactions with lactose donor 1c proceeded smoothly, which demonstrates that this reaction is compatible with more complex sugar donors. As with glucose, the reaction with both donors only afforded the products exclusively as β-anomers.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2.

C-glycosylations of galactose donor 1b and lactose donor 1c.

The ketone in the resultant homoacyl-β-C-glycosides can serve as a handle for elaboration to more complex structures. For example, C-glycoside 2 can be elaborated to the model C-glycolipid 39 (Scheme 3). To this end, Baeyer–Villiger oxidation of 2 provides ester 37 in moderate yield.[20] Reduction of 37 using DIBAL then affords alcohol 38. Finally, treatment of 38 with octanoyl chloride affords C-glycolipid analog 39 in 70% yield.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3.

Derivatization of C-glycoside 2 into glycolipid mimics.

In addition, we noticed the possibility of transforming the acyl furan on 15 into a monosaccharide-like structure. Following O’Doherty’s de novo synthetic protocol,[19b, 19c, 21] ketone 15 was first reduced using Noyori asymmetrc transfer hydrogenation,[22] affording alcohol 40 in quantitative yield. This alcohol was subjected to NBS to generate functionalized enone 41 in 79% yield. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first Achmatowicz reaction performed on a carbohydrate substrate, and it expands the utility of this method to the synthesis of C-disaccharide analogs.

We propose that this C-glycosylation proceeds through a SN2-like displacement of an α-glycosyl sulfonate. To rule out the possibility of a base-catalyzed epimerization[8] of the α-C-glycoside in situ, we turned to primary 13C kinetic isotope studies.[23] Using Jacobsen and Kwan’s modification[24] of the Singleton procedure,[25] we measured a KIE value of 1.029 for the reaction. This value is typical of SN2-like glycosylations,[26] and is in line with values that have previously been reported by the Crich, Chan and Bennet, and our own groups.[17d, 27]

In summary, we have developed an efficient and highly stereoselective approach to β-C-homoacyl and β-C-acyl glycosides. The protocol, which employs bench-stable hemiacetals as donors, tolerates a range of substrates, including heterocycle-containing nucleophiles. These C-alkyl glycosides can be transformed into a variety of different products, including C-analogs of glycolipids and disaccharides. We anticipate that this chemistry will find board utility both in natural product and medicinal C-glycoside synthesis.

Supplementary Material

supp info

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4.

Derivatization of C-glycoside 15 by Achmatowicz rearrangement.

Acknowledgements

We thank NIGMS (No.: 1U01GM120414) for their generous support. Furthermore, we thank Dr. Minghua Zhuo for her support in reaction optimzation.

Footnotes

Supporting information for this article is given via a link at the end of the document.

References

  • [1].a) Varki A, Glycobiology 1993, 3, 97–130; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Dwek RA, Chem. Rev 1996, 96, 683–720; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Varki A, Glycobiology 2017, 27, 3–49; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Berti F, Adamo R, Chem. Soc. Rev 2018, 47, 9015–9025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].a) Nicotra F, in Glycoscience Synthesis of Substrate Analogs and Mimetics (Eds.: Driguez H, Thiem J), Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 1998, pp. 55–83; [Google Scholar]; b) Lin C-H, Lin H-C, Yang W-B, Curr. Top. Med. Chem 2005, 5, 1431–1457; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Philip GH, Curr. Top. Med. Chem 2005, 5, 1299–1331; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Wei Z, Curr. Top. Med. Chem 2005, 5, 1363–1391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].a) Bertozzi CR, Cook DG, Kobertz WR, Gonzalez-Scarano F, Bednarski MD, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1992, 114, 10639–10641; [Google Scholar]; b) Wei A, Boy KM, Kishi Y, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1995, 117, 9432–9436; [Google Scholar]; c) Schmieg J, Yang G, Franck RW, Tsuji M, J. Exp. Med 2003, 198, 1631–1641; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Yang G, Schmieg J, Tsuji M, Franck RW, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2004, 43, 3818–3822; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem 2004, 116, 3906–3910 [Google Scholar]; e) Cavezza A, Boulle C, Guéguiniat A, Pichaud P, Trouille S, Ricard L, Dalko-Csiba M, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett 2009, 19, 845–849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].a) Postema MHD, Piper JL, Liu L, Komanduri V, Betts RL, in Glycomimetics: Modern Synthetic Methodologies, Vol. 896, American Chemical Society, 2005, pp. 23–51; [Google Scholar]; b) Lalitha K, Muthusamy K, Prasad YS, Vemula PK, Nagarajan S, Carbohydr. Res 2015, 402, 158–171; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Yang Y, Yu B, Chem. Rev 2017, 117, 12281–12356; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Liao H, Ma J, Yao H, Liu X-W, Org. Biomol. Chem 2018, 16, 1791–1806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].a) For representative examples see: Wong C-H, Moris-Varas F, Hung S-C, Marron TG, Lin C-C, Gong KW, Weitz-Schmidt G, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1997, 119, 8152–8158; [Google Scholar]; b) Dondoni A, Marra A, Chem. Commun 1999, 2133–2145;; c) Chen G, Chien M, Tsuji M, Franck RW, ChemBioChem 2006, 7, 1017–1022; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Denton RW, Tony KA, Hernández-Gay JJ, Cañada FJ, Jiménez-Barbero J, Mootoo DR, Carbohydr. Res 2007, 342, 1624–1635; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Koester DC, Holkenbrink A, Werz DB, Synthesis 2010, 3217–3234;; f) Liu Z, Courtney AN, Metelista LS, Bittman R, ChemBioChem 2012, 13, 1733–1737; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Geng Y, Kumar A, Faidallah HM, Albar HA, Mhkalid IA, Schmidt RR, Bioorg. Med. Chem 2013, 21, 4793–4802; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h) Johnson S, Bagbi AK, Tanaka F J Org. Chem 2018, 83, 4581–4597; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i) Zhu F, Rodriguez J, O’Neill S, Walczak MA, ACS Cent. Sci 2018, 4, 1652–1662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Disadee W, Mahidol C, Sahakitpichan P, Sitthimonchai S, Ruchirawat S, Kanchanapoom T, Phytochemistry 2012, 74, 115–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].a) Schmidt RR, Hoffmann M, Angew. Chem 1983, 95, 417–418; [Google Scholar]; b) Stewart AO, Williams RM, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1985, 107, 4289–4296; [Google Scholar]; c) Allevi P, Anastasia M, Ciuffreda P, Fiecchi A, Scala A, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Comm 1987, 1245–1246.
  • [8].Allevi P, Anastasia M, Ciuffreda P, Fiecchi A, Scala A, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 1 1989, 1275–1280. [Google Scholar]
  • [9].a) Rodrigues F, Canac Y, Lubineau A, Chem. Comm 2000, 2049–2050;; b) Voigt B, Matviitsuk A, Mahrwald R, Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 4302–4310; [Google Scholar]; c) Johnson S, Bagdi AK, Tanaka F, J. Org. Chem 2018, 83, 4581–4597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Pasetto P, Walczak MC, Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 8468–8477. [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Ranoux A, Lemiègre L, Benoit M, Guégan J-P, Benvegnu T, Eur. J. Org. Chem 2010, 2010, 1314–1323. [Google Scholar]
  • [12].a) For earlier studies on transition metal catalysed C-glycoside synthesis see: Ye J, Bhatt RK, Falck JR, Tetrahedron Lett 1993, 34, 8007–8010; [Google Scholar]; b) Ye J, Bhatt RK, Falck JR, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1994, 116, 1–5; [Google Scholar]; c) Belosludtsev YY, Bhatt RK, Falck JR, Tetrahedron Lett 1995, 36, 5881–5882; [Google Scholar]; d) Falck JR, Bhatt RK, Ye J, J. Am Chem. Soc 1995, 117, 5973–5982. [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Boehlich GJ, Schützenmeister N, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2019, 58, 5110–5113; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem 2019, 131, 5164–5167. [Google Scholar]
  • [14].a) Zhao C, Jia X, Wang X, Gong H, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 17645–17651; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Badir SO, Dumoulin A, Matsui JK, Molander GA, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2018, 57, 6610–6613; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem 2018, 130, 6320–6723. [Google Scholar]
  • [15].a) Guisot NES, Ella Obame I, Ireddy P, Nourry A, Saluzzo C, Dujardin G, Dubreuil D, Pipelier M, Guillarme S, J. Org. Chem 2016, 81, 2364–2371; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Ella Obame I, Ireddy P, Guisot NES, Nourry A, Saluzzo C, Dujardin G, Dubreuil D, Pipelier M, Guillarme S, Eur. J. Org. Chem 2018, 2018, 1735–1738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].a) Dondoni A, Marra A, Tetrahedron Lett 2003, 44, 13–16; [Google Scholar]; b) Dondoni A, Catozzi N, Marra A, J. Org. Chem 2005, 70, 9257–9268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].a) Issa JP, Lloyd D, Steliotes E, Bennett CS, Org. Lett 2013, 15, 4170–4173; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Issa JP, Bennett CS, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 5740–5744; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Lloyd D, Bennett CS, Chem.–Eur. J 2018, 24, 7610–7614; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Zhuo M-H, Wilbur DJ, Kwan EE, Bennett CS, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141, 16743–16754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].a) Zhang Z, Ollmann IR, Ye X-S, Wischnat R, Baasov T, Wong C-H, J. Am Chem. Soc 1999, 121, 734–753; [Google Scholar]; b) Ritter TK, Mong K-KT, Liu H, Nakatani T, Wong C-H, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2003, 42, 4657–4660; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem 2003, 115, 4805–4808. [Google Scholar]
  • [19].a) Achmatowicz O, Bukowski P, Szechner B, Zwierzchowska Z, Zamojski A, Tetrahedron 1971, 27, 1973–1996; [Google Scholar]; b) Harris JM, Keranen MD, O’Doherty GA, J. Org. Chem 1999, 64, 2982–2983; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Harris JM, Li M, Scott JG, O’Doherty GA, in Strategies and Tactics in Organic Synthesis, Vol. 5 (Ed.: Harmata M), Academic Press, 2004, pp. 221–253. [Google Scholar]; d) Song W, Wang S, Tang W, Chem.–Asian J 2017, 12, 1027–1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Quintard A, Rodriguez J, ACS Catalysis 2017, 7, 5513–5517. [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Babu RS, Chen Q, Kang S-W, Zhou M, O’Doherty GA, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2012, 134, 11952–11955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Fujii A, Hashiguchi S, Uematsu N, Ikariya T, Noyori R, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1996, 118, 2521–2522. [Google Scholar]
  • [23]. See SI for further information.
  • [24].Kwan EE, Park Y, Besser HA, Anderson TL, Jacobsen EN, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 43–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Singleton DA, Thomas AA, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1995, 117, 9357–9358. [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Berti PJ, Tanaka KSE, in Advances in Physical Organic Chemistry, Vol. 37, Academic Press, 2002, pp. 239–314. [Google Scholar]
  • [27].a) Huang M, Garrett GE, Birlirakis N, Bohé L, Pratt DA, Crich D, Nat. Chem 2012, 4, 663–667; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Chan J, Sannikova N, Tang A, Bennet A, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 12225–12228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supp info

RESOURCES