Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2019 Dec 25;67(3):579–586. doi: 10.1007/s12020-019-02160-z

Inverse association between glucose-lowering medications and severe hyponatremia: a Swedish population-based case-control study

Henrik Falhammar 1,2,, Jakob Skov 1, Jan Calissendorff 1,2, Jonatan D Lindh 3, Buster Mannheimer 4
PMCID: PMC7054247  PMID: 31875925

Abstract

Context

Glucose-lowering medications have occasionally been reported to cause hyponatremia, but the evidence is scarce.

Objectives

To explore the association between glucose-lowering medications and severe hyponatremia.

Design, setting, and participants

Subjects hospitalized with a principal diagnosis of hyponatremia (n = 14,359) were compared with matched controls (n = 57,383). Data were derived by linkage of national population-based registers. Multivariable logistic regression adjusting for co-medication, diseases, previous hospitalizations, and socioeconomic factors was used to explore the association between hospitalization for hyponatremia and the use of different glucose-lowering medications. Furthermore, newly initiated (≤90 days) and ongoing use was investigated separately.

Main outcome measures

Hospitalization due to hyponatremia.

Results

The unadjusted ORs (95% CI) for hospitalization due to hyponatremia were 1.41 (1.29–1.54) for insulins, 1.38 (1.27–1.50) for metformin, and 1.22 (1.07–1.38) for sulfonylureas. However, after adjustment for confounding factors the association was consistently reversed. Thus, for any glucose-lowering medication the adjusted OR was 0.63 (0.58–0.68). For insulins, metformin and sulfonylureas, adjusted ORs (95% CI) were 0.58 (0.52–0.65), 0.81 (0.72–0.90) and 0.81 (0.69–0.94), respectively. Odds ratios for newly initated medications were overall higher while those for ongoing treatment were further decreased. Thus, adjusted ORs (95% CI) for ongoing treatment with insulins, metformin, and sulfonylureas were 0.54 (0.48–0.61), 0.82 (0.73–0.91) and 0.78 (0.66–0.92).

Conclusions

Glucose-lowering medications did not increase the risk for hospitalization due to severe hyponatremia. In fact, the association was inverse across all investigated drugs. The association may be mediated by pharmacologic mechanisms, but the uniform effects across drug-classes suggest properties of the diabetic disease are of importance.

Keywords: Diabetes, Hospitalization, Hyponatremia, SIADH, Adverse reaction

Introduction

Electrolyte disturbances are common in patients, with up to 30% of all hospitalized patients displaying hyponatremia [1, 2]. Symptoms of hyponatremia range from mild, non-specific such as lethargy, agitation, and confusion to severe life-threatening such as seizures, coma and death due to brain edema [37]. Drugs such as thiazide diuretics, antidepressants, antiepileptic drugs, and antipsychotics are common causes of hyponatremia [816].

Electrolyte disturbances are frequent in diabetes mellitus, mainly due to diuretics, acid-base disturbances, and poor glycemic control. Translocational hyponatremia is common in hyperglycemia. The osmotic effect of excess glucose in the extracellular compartment causes a shift of water from the intracellular to the extracellular space, diluting the plasma sodium [6, 17, 18]. This form of hyponatremia is hypertonic and does not reflect a primary dysregulation of water and sodium balance, but rather a dysregulation of glucose. However, hypotonic hyponatremia, reflecting a primary dysregulation in water balance, has been described in occasional case reports and smaller observational studies for sulfonylureas [1925] as well as insulin [26], metformin [27], and thiazolidinediones [28]. Cell studies also indicate that insulin has a direct effect on water homeostasis [29]. In contrast, based on an artificial syndrome of inappropriate ADH-secretion (SIADH) model, the SGLT2-inibitor empagliflozin, with its increased urine excretion through osmotic diuresis, has been suggested as a new treatment option for SIADH-induced hyponatremia [30]. Thus, the evidence about glucose-lowering medications and hyponatremia remains insufficient.

The primary aim of this study was to investigate the association between treatment with glucose-lowering medications and hospitalization due to severe hyponatremia. Secondarily, we aimed to evaluate newly initiated versus ongoing use of glucose-lowering medications to investigate any time-dependent effects.

Methods

The study was a retrospective case-control study of the Swedish general population. The principal diagnosis of each admission was used since this reflects the main cause of the hospitalization. The International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD10), is used by all physicians in Sweden to code all hospitalizations and outpatient visits [31]. Adult patients (≥18 years) hospitalized with a first-ever (defined as not occurring since 1 January 1997) principal ICD10 code of E87.1 (hyponatremia) or E22.2 (SIADH secretion) in The National Patient Register (NPR) (see below) were classified as cases during the study period (1 October 2005 to 31 December 2014). Four age-, sex- and municipality-matched controls per case with no previous diagnosis of hyponatremia (since 1 January 1997) were randomly identified from the Total Population Register. The principal diagnosis of hyponatremia, with sodium levels corrected for glucose levels, was validated in one of the larger hospitals. More details on this process can be found elsewhere [11].

All variables in the multiple logistic regression analysis are presented in Table 1. Potential confounders for hyponatremia were identified using ICD10 codes, Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes, and parameters from the Longitudinal integration database for health insurance and labor market studies (LISA)-register [11]. Exposure to glucose-lowering medications was defined as a documented dispensation within 90 days prior to the index date, i.e., the date of admission due to hyponatremia. In the matched controls, the index date was the admission date of their case. Almost all drugs used for long-term treatment are dispensed every 90 days in Sweden [11]. Adjustment for concurrent disorders was done since 1 January 1997 to the index date, with the exception of infectious diseases (which were adjusted for within 90 days before the index date). Newly initiated use of glucose-lowering medications was defined as treatment introduced within 90 days before the index date and at least 12 months of no exposure beforehand. The definition of ongoing use of glucose-lowering medications also required one or more dispensations in the period 91–454 days before the index date.

Table 1.

Variables included in the multiple logistic regression analysis and their definition

Variables Codes
ATC codes beginning with
Drugs of primary interest
Insulins A10A
Metformin A10BA02
Sulfonylureas A10BB
DPP4-inhibitors A10BH
GLP1-analogs A10BX04, A10BX07, A10BX10, A10BX13, A10BX14, A10BJ
SGLT-2 inhibitors A10BX09, A10BX11, A10BX12, A10BK
Thiazolidinediones A10BG
Meglitinides A10BX02, A10BX03
Antiepileptic drugs
Carbamazepine N03AF01
Oxcarbazepine N03AF02
Phenytoin N03AB02
Valproate N03AG01
Lamotrigine N03AX09
Levetiracetam N03AX14
Gabapentin N03AX12
Diuretics and drugs on the renin-angiotensin system
Furosemide C03C
Thiazides C03A, C09BA, C09DA, C03EA
Agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system C09
Antibiotics
Fluoroquinolones J01MA
Macrolides J01FA
Trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole J01EE
Antidepressants
SSRIs N06AB
Tricyclic antidepressants N06AA
Other antidepressants N06AX
Other drugs
Amiodarone C01BD01
Desmopressin H01BA02
Proton pump inhibitors A02BC, A02BD06
Antipsychotics (including lithium) N05A
ICD10 codes beginning with
Renal diseases
Renal insufficiency N17-19, procedure codes DR016, DR024, KAS00, KAS10, KAS20
Infections
Sepsis A41
Pneumonia J18
Meningitis G00–G07
Heart and vascular diseases
Ischemic heart disease I20–25
Congestive heart failure I50
Cerebrovascular diseases I60–64, I69
Gastrointestinal diseases
Pancreatic disease K85, K860-1
Inflammatory bowel disease K50-51
Liver diseases K70-77 Procedure codes JJB, JJC
Other diseases
Hypothyroidism E03, E06.3
Malnutrition E43.9, E41.9
COPD J44
Pulmonary embolism I26
Malignancy C
Combination of ATC- and ICD10 codes, each beginning with
Alcoholism

ATC: N07BB

ICD10: E244, F10, G312, G621, G721, I426, K292, K70, K860, O354, P043, Q860, T51, Y90-91, Z502, Z714

Adrenal insufficiency

ATC: H02AA, H01BA

ICD10: E27.1, E27.2, E27.3, E27.4, E25

Socioeconomic factors
Education Increasing levels of education from 1–6, continuous variable
Income Income in Swedish crowns during 1 year per family, continuous variable
Unemployment Number of days, continuous variable
Proxy for frailty
Drug use Number of dispensed drugs 90 days prior to index date, categorized into <4, 4–7, 8–12 and >12 drugs
Duration of hospitalization ≥3 days

A diagnosis of diabetes (ICD10 codes E10-14) was not included in the multiple regression analysis

SSRIs selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Using the unique Swedish personal identification number linkage between the population-based registers was possible. The NPR, The Swedish Prescribed Drug Register (SPDR) and the LISA-register were all utilized in the linkage [3133]. The NPR contains all the ICD10 codes (since 1997), while the SPDR contains all prescriptions dispensed in Sweden (since 1 July 2005). The LISA-register was used to control for socioeconomic variables. The Regional Ethical Review Board in Stockholm approved the study and as this was a retrospective epidemiological study, formal consent was waived.

Statistical analysis

The associations between hospitalization due to hyponatremia and glucose-lowering medications were analyzed by means of univariable and multivariable logistic regression. In these models, the reference group was defined as individuals unexposed to any of the drugs or variables adjusted for (see Table 1). The associations between glucose-lowering medications and hospitalization due to hyponatremia in cases and controls were reported as unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (OR), with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. For all analyses R version 3.3.2 was used [34].

Results

In 14,359 adult individuals the principal discharge diagnosis had been hyponatremia and they were matched to 57,382 controls identified in the Total Population Register. Overall, 72% were females and the median age in the cohort was 76 years (range 18–103). In Table 2, a selection of medical conditions and the use of glucose-lowering medications at baseline (index date) are presented in the entire group as well as in individuals below or over 65 years of age. The most frequent medical disorders besides hyponatremia were malignancy, ischemic heart disease, alcoholism, and diabetes. Among individuals <65 years old, females and chronic disease were less frequent while alcoholism was more prevalent compared with individuals ≥65 years old. In total, 10.1% of the cases had been recently dispensed a glucose-lowering medication compared with 7.5% of the controls. The most common glucose-lowering medications in both cases and controls were metformin (n = 3027), insulin (n = 2510), and sulfonylureas (n = 1359), while the number on meglitinides (n = 221), DPP4-inhibitors (n = 138), thiazolidinediones (n = 78), or GLP-1 analogs (n = 78) was lower. In the two individuals using a SGLT-2 inhibitor no OR was calculated.

Table 2.

Medical characteristics (selection of items from Table 1) in addition to glucose-lowering medication use among cases (hospitalized with a principal diagnosis of hyponatremia) and controls at index date

Number of total cases (n = 14,359) Number of total controls (n = 57,382) Number of cases <65 years (n = 3421) Number of controls <65 years (n = 13,684) Number of cases ≥65 years (n = 10,938) Number of controls ≥65 years (n = 43,698)
Median age (range) 76 years (18–103) 76 years (18–103) 57 years (18–64) 57 years (18–64) 81 years (65–103) 81 years (65–103)
Females 10,336 (72.0%) 41,299 (72.0%) 1822 (53.3%) 7288 (53.3%) 8514 (77.8%) 34,011 (77.8%)
Diagnosis
Malignancy 3826 (26.6%) 11251 (19.6%) 595 (17.4%) 1144 (8.4%) 3231 (29.5%) 10,107 (23.1%)
Ischemic heart disease 2808 (19.6%) 7880 (13.7%) 272 (8.0%) 469 (3.4%) 2536 (23.2%) 7411 (17.0%)
Alcoholism 2285 (15.9%) 1028 (1.8%) 1301 (38.0%) 462 (3.4%) 984 (9.0%) 566 (1.3%)
Diabetes 2273 (15.8%) 4995 (8.7%) 552 (16.1%) 493 (3.6%) 1721 (15.7%) 4502 (10.3%)
Congestive heart failure 1900 (13.2%) 4493 (7.8%) 226 (6.7%) 105 (0.8%) 1674 (15.3%) 4388 (10.0%)
Cerebrovascular diseases 1884 (13.1%) 4540 (7.9%) 319 (9.3%) 202 (1.5%) 1565 (14.3%) 4338 (9.9%)
COPD 1477 (10.3%) 1958 (3.4%) 345 (10.1%) 132 (1.0%) 1132 (10.3%) 1826 (4.2%)
Hypothyroidism 1439 (10.0%) 2396 (4.2%) 205 (6.0%) 166 (1.2%) 1234 (11.3%) 2230 (5.1%)
Adrenal insufficiency 586 (4.1%) 340 (0.6%) 168 (4.9%) 37 (0.3%) 424 (3.9%) 303 (0.7%)
Renal diseases 631 (4.4%) 1098 (1.9%) 185 (5.4%) 73 (0.5%) 446 (4.1%) 1025 (2.3%)
Liver diseases 553 (3.9%) 417 (0.7%) 254 (7.4%) 113 (0.8%) 399 (3.6%) 304 (0.7%)
Pancreatic disease 327 (2.3%) 513 (0.9%) 136 (4.0%) 74 (0.5%) 191 (1.7%) 439 (1.0%)
Inflammatory bowel disease 285 (2.0%) 533 (0.1%) 113 (3.3%) 142 (1.0%) 172 (1.6%) 391 (0.9%)
Glucose-lowering medication, total
Insulins 648 (4.5%) 1862 (3.2%) 215 (6.3%) 209 (1.5%) 433 (4.0%) 1653 (3.8%)
Metformin 768 (5.3%) 2259 (3.9%) 185 (5.4%) 357 (2.6%) 583 (5.3%) 1902 (4.4%)
Sulfonylureas 316 (2.2%) 1043 (1.8%) 44 (1.3%) 86 (0.6%) 272 (2.5%) 957 (2.2%)
DPP4-inhibitors 31 (0.2%) 107 (0.2%) 4 (0.1%) 22 (0.2%) 27 (0.2%) 85 (0.2%)
GLP1-analogs 9 (0.06%) 34 (0.06%) 2 (0.06%) 11 (0.08%) 7 (0.06%) 23 (0.05%)
SGLT-2 inhibitors 1 (0.007%) 1 (0.002%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.007%) 1 (0.09%) 0 (0%)
Thiazolidinediones 21 (0.1%) 57 (0.1%) 6 (0.2%) 14 (0.1%) 15 (0.1%) 43 (0.1%)
Meglitinides 55 (0.4%) 166 (0.3%) 6 (0.2%) 14 (0.1%) 42 (0.4%) 145 (0.3%)
Any glucose-lowering medication 1446 (10.1%) 4320 (7.5%) 378 (11.0%) 551 (4.0%) 1068 (9.8%) 3769 (8.6%)
Glucose-lowering medication, newly initiated treatment
Insulins 78 (0.5%) 107 (0.2%) 24 (0.7%) 9 (0.07%) 54 (0.5%) 98 (0.2%)
Metformin 48 (0.3%) 150 (0.3%) 11 (0.3%) 28 (0.2%) 37 (0.3%) 122 (0.3%)
Sulfonylureas 34 (0.2%) 91 (0.2%) 7 (0.2%) 10 (0.07%) 27 (0.2%) 81 (0.2%)
DPP4-inhibitors 7 (0.05%) 20 (0.03%) 1 (0.03%) 6 (0.04%) 6 (0.05%) 14 (0.03%)
GLP1-analogs 4 (0.03%) 7 (0.01%) 1 (0.03%) 4 (0.03%) 3 (0.03%) 3 (0.007%)
SGLT\ inhibitors 1 (0.007%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.009%) 0 (0%)
Thiazolidinediones 2 (0.01%) 3 (0.005%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.007%) 2 (0.02%) 2 (0.005%)
Meglitinides 8 (0.06%) 16 (0.03%) 1 (0.03%) 2 (0.01%) 7 (0.06%) 14 (0.03%)
Any glucose-lowering medication 91 (0.6%) 206 (0.4%) 28 (0.8%) 29 (0.2%) 63 (0.6%) 177 (0.4%)

COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The association between exposure to glucose-lowering medications and hyponatremia hospitalization is presented in Fig. 1. Compared with controls, the unadjusted OR for hospitalization due to hyponatremia for any glucose-lowering medication compared with controls was 1.38 (1.29–1.46). The unadjusted ORs for (95% CI) was 1.41 (1.29–1.54) for insulins, 1.38 (1.27–1.50) for metformin, and 1.22 (1.07–1.38) for sulfonylureas. However, after adjustment for confounding factors the association was consistently reversed. Thus, for any glucose-lowering medication the adjusted OR was 0.63 (0.58–0.68). ORs (95% CI) for insulins, metformin, and sulfonylureas were 0.58 (0.52–0.65), 0.81 (0.72–0.90), and 0.81 (0.69–0.94), respectively.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The crude (white) and adjusted (black, all variables in Table 1) odds ratio (OR), including 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for hospitalization due to severe hyponatremia in patients on different glucose-lowering medication (newly/ongoing)

In Fig. 2 the effect of newly initiated glucose-lowering medication use versus ongoing therapy (adjusted ORs) is presented. OR for newly initiated medications were overall higher while ongoing treatment was further decreased. Thus, adjusted ORs (95% CI) for ongoing treatment with insulins, metformin, and sulfonylureas were 0.54 (0.48–0.61), 0.82 (0.73–0.91), and 0.78 (0.66–0.92).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The odds ratio (OR), including 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for hospitalization due to severe hyponatremia in patients with ongoing (white) and newly initiated glucose-lowering medication (black). All ORs have been adjusted for the confounding factors in Table 1

Discussion

This is the first population-based case-control study reporting on glucose-lowering medications and hospitalization due to severe hyponatremia. Glucose-lowering medications were associated with severe hyponatremia requiring hospitalization. However, after adjusting for confounding factors the associations were consistently reversed with OR ranging from 0.45 to 0.81. These inverse associations were more pronounced for ongoing compared with newly initiated treatment.

Glucose-lowering medication-induced hyponatremia has previously been reported in occasional case reports or, for sulfonylurea, also in smaller observational studies [1928]. In one study, published in 1983, 6.3% of 176 patients treated with chlorpropamide developed hyponatremia during a mean follow-up period of 7.4 years, compared with 0.6% in 162 patients treated with tolbutamide or glibenclamide [20]. However, adjustment for factors known to induce hyponatremia had not been done. The results of the present study are in line with these studies showing a crude increased association between glucose-lowering medications and hospitalization due to severe hyponatremia. However, after adjustment for potential confounding factors, the effect not only disappeared but consistently was reversed suggesting a protective effect.

The results indicated a temporal association between initiation of glucose-lowering medication and hospitalization due to hyponatremia, i.e., the risk of severe hyponatremia was higher for drugs newly initiated versus ongoing treatment, especially for insulin and GLP-1 analog use. This may be explained by the fact that a subclinical diabetes is often revealed by severe diseases such as pneumonia, pyelonephritis, or acute pancreatitis [35], which in turn may increase the risk for a near future hospitalization due to hyponatremia.

Theoretically, possible mechanisms may be associated to the pharmacologic action of respective drug, or to mechanisms attributed to the underlying diabetes. Glibenclamide has been reported to induce diuresis [23], probably due to antagonistic effect to ADH [36]. It has even been used to treat SIADH [37]. Insulins can also cause fluid retention but have antinatriuretic properties as well and increase sodium reabsorption by effects on renal sodium channels [38]. The mechanism of action for metformin is not entirely clear, and a putative protective effect against severe hyponatremia may be more difficult to explain. Although the use of the remaining glucose-lowering medications was lower and the estimations therefore more uncertain resulting in wider confidence intervals, the overall tendency went in the same direction towards an inverse association with hospitalization for severe hyponatremia.

The common denominator among the drugs investigated in the present study is that they are used to treat individuals with diabetes. Their chemical structures and mechanism of action are very different. The fact that the association was inverse across all drugs despite their heterogeneity, may suggest that factors other than the glucose-lowering medication per se could be considered. The most likely explanation is perhaps the diabetic disease. In other words, diabetes itself may protect against severe hyponatremia requiring hospitalization. The most plausible mechanism may involve reversing water retention caused by SIADH, the most common cause of hyponatremia [6]. Hyperglycemia with plasma glucose levels above the renal threshold for reabsorption result in osmotic diuresis and reduced extracellular volume. Thus, this mechanism potentially counteracts the effect of SIADH resulting in a decreased risk for severe hyponatremia.

This study has some further strengths and limitations. The major strength is the population-based design with the inclusion of all patients admitted with a principal diagnosis of hyponatremia, i.e., severe hyponatremia, in the entire country during almost a decade. The major limitation on the other hand was that no plasma sodium levels were available. However, only clinically relevant hyponatremia was included since we used the Swedish physicians’ mandatory selection of principal diagnosis. We believe this is an advantage compared with studies including individuals with hyponatremia as a secondary diagnosis, diagnoses made in the secondary care [9], or patients with a mild to moderate hyponatremia regardless of symptoms [10]. In a previous validation of 104 patients hospitalized with a principal diagnosis of hyponatremia, we found that 89% of cases had a correct principal diagnosis, with a mean plasma sodium level of 121 mmol/L [11]. What is more, 77% had been exposed to levels below <125 mmol/L [11], i.e., the level defining profound hyponatremia [6], further showing the clinical relevance of the outcome used. To investigate the possibility that the hyponatremia in a proportion of cases was explained by translocational hyponatremia due to a badly controlled diabetes we reviewed the 104 hospitalizations in the validation cohort. It turned out that 15 patients had been diagnosed with diabetes at the point of hospitalization. Mean (range) HbA1c was 66 (43–128) mmol/L. Crude and glucose corrected (range) sodium levels were 118 (110–128) and 120 (110–130) mmol/L, respectively. Furthermore, in none of the 15 cases the hyponatremia was caused by translocational hyponatremia.

However, among the vast majority of patients outside the validation cohort we did not have access to blood glucose levels. Therefore, we cannot exclude that patients suffering from translocational hyponatremia due to hyperglycemia erroneously received a principal diagnosis of hyponatremia. While theoretically possible, this is an unlikely explanation to our findings; Firstly, for translocational hyponatremia to cause a serum sodium levels to drop to 125 mmol/L or lower, glucose levels would have to be in excess of 40 mmol/L, corresponding to a glycemic crisis. In this setting a principal diagnosis of hyponatremia seems unlikely. Secondly, a misdiagnosis of translocational hyponatremia for hypotonic hyponatremia would have resulted in a positive bias that would have caused us to overestimate rather than underestimate the negative associations observed in this study. Finally, although we corrected for various of concomitant conditions and medications, the risk for residual confounding cannot be excluded.

There are several important clinical implications of the present study. Firstly, severe hyponatremia may occur despite rather than due to any glucose-lowering medication or underlying diabetic disease. Secondly, the current study exemplifies the importance of postmarketing surveillance to reveal hitherto unrecognized properties of medications and to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of the drug [39, 40].

In conclusion, glucose-lowering medications did not increase the risk for hospitalization due to severe hyponatremia. In fact, the associations were consistently inverse across all investigated drugs. Theoretically, this association may be mediated by pharmacologic mechanisms, but the uniform effects across all drug-classes suggests properties of the diabetic disease are of importance.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgements

This was an academic investigation with funding from the Cebix incorporated (grant number CBX129801-DN-201, B.M.), the Stockholm County Medical Committee (grant number HSTV18048, J.C.) and the Magnus Bervall Foundation (grant number 2017-02138 and 2018-02566, Henrik Falhammar). Open access funding provided by Karolinska Institute.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Drs J.S. and B.M. report consultancy fees from Otsuka Pharma Scandinavia AB, outside the submitted work. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Change history

11/16/2020

A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1007/s12020-020-02542-8

References

  • 1.Upadhyay A, Jaber BL, Madias NE. Incidence and prevalence of hyponatremia. Am. J. Med. 2006;119(7 Suppl 1):S30–S35. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Al Alawi AM, Majoni SW, Falhammar H. Magnesium and human health: perspectives and research directions. Int J. Endocrinol. 2018;2018:9041694. doi: 10.1155/2018/9041694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Renneboog B, Musch W, Vandemergel X, Manto MU, Decaux G. Mild chronic hyponatremia is associated with falls, unsteadiness, and attention deficits. Am. J. Med. 2006;119(1):71 e71–e78. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.09.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nigro N, Winzeler B, Suter-Widmer I, Schuetz P, Arici B, Bally M, Blum C, Bingisser R, Bock A, Huber A, Muller B, Nickel CH, Christ-Crain M. Symptoms and characteristics of individuals with profound hyponatremia: a prospective multicenter observational study. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2015;63(3):470–475. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Verbalis JG, Goldsmith SR, Greenberg A, Korzelius C, Schrier RW, Sterns RH, Thompson CJ. Diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hyponatremia: expert panel recommendations. Am. J. Med. 2013;126(10 Suppl 1):S1–S42. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Spasovski G, Vanholder R, Allolio B, Annane D, Ball S, Bichet D, Decaux G, Fenske W, Hoorn EJ, Ichai C, Joannidis M, Soupart A, Zietse R, Haller M, van der Veer S, Van Biesen W, Nagler E, , Hyponatraemia Guideline Development Group Clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of hyponatraemia. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2014;170(3):G1–G47. doi: 10.1530/EJE-13-1020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.B. Mannheimer, J. Skov, H. Falhammar, J. Calissendorff, J.D. Lindh, D. Nathanson, Sex-specific risks of death in patients hospitalized for hyponatremia: a population-based study. Endocrine (2019). 10.1007/s12020-019-02073-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8.Liamis G, Milionis H, Elisaf M. A review of drug-induced hyponatremia. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2008;52(1):144–153. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Coupland C, Dhiman P, Morriss R, Arthur A, Barton G, Hippisley-Cox J. Antidepressant use and risk of adverse outcomes in older people: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2011;343:d4551. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Leth-Moller KB, Hansen AH, Torstensson M, Andersen SE, Odum L, Gislasson G, Torp-Pedersen C, Holm EA. Antidepressants and the risk of hyponatremia: a Danish register-based population study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(5):e011200. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Farmand S, Lindh JD, Calissendorff J, Skov J, Falhammar H, Nathanson D, Mannheimer B. Differences in associations of antidepressants and hospitalization due to hyponatremia. Am. J. Med. 2018;131(1):56–63. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.07.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Falhammar H, Lindh JD, Calissendorff J, Farmand S, Skov J, Nathanson D, Mannheimer B. Differences in associations of antiepileptic drugs and hospitalization due to hyponatremia: a population-based case-control study. Seizure. 2018;59:28–33. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Falhammar H, Lindh JD, Calissendorff J, Skov J, Nathanson D, Mannheimer B. Antipsychotics and severe hyponatremia: a Swedish population-based case-control study. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2019;60:71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2018.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Falhammar H, Lindh JD, Calissendorff J, Skov J, Nathanson D, Mannheimer B. Associations of proton pump inhibitors and hospitalization due to hyponatremia: a population-based case-control study. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2019;59:65–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2018.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.H. Falhammar, J. Calissendorff, J. Skov, D. Nathanson, J.D. Lindh, B. Mannheimer, Tramadol- and codeine-induced severe hyponatremia: a Swedish population-based case-control study. Eur. J. Intern. Med. (2019). 10.1016/j.ejim.2019.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 16.C. Fahlen Bergh, S. Toivanen, K. Johnell, J. Calissendorff, J. Skov, H. Falhammar, D. Nathanson, J.D. Lindh, B. Mannheimer, Factors of importance for discontinuation of thiazides associated with hyponatremia in Sweden: a population-based register study. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. (2019). 10.1002/pds.4922 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 17.Sotirakopoulos N, Kalogiannidou I, Tersi M, Armentzioiou K, Sivridis D, Mavromatidis K. Acid-base and electrolyte disorders in patients with diabetes mellitus. Saudi J. Kidney Dis. Transpl. 2012;23(1):58–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liamis G, Liberopoulos E, Barkas F, Elisaf M. Diabetes mellitus and electrolyte disorders. World J. Clin. Cases. 2014;2(10):488–496. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i10.488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Weissman PN, Shenkman L, Gregerman RI. Chlorpropamide hyponatremia: drug-induced inappropriate antidiuretic-hormone activity. N. Engl. J. Med. 1971;284(2):65–71. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197101142840202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kadowaki T, Hagura R, Kajinuma H, Kuzuya N, Yoshida S. Chlorpropamide-induced hyponatremia: incidence and risk factors. Diabetes Care. 1983;6(5):468–471. doi: 10.2337/diacare.6.5.468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Berger W. Incidence of severe sideeffects during therapy with sulfonylureas and biguanides. Horm. Metab. Res Suppl. 1985;15:111–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shepshelovich D, Schechter A, Calvarysky B, Diker-Cohen T, Rozen-Zvi B, Gafter-Gvili A. Medication-induced SIADH: distribution and characterization according to medication class. Br. J. Clin. Pharm. 2017;83(8):1801–1807. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Moses AM, Howanitz J, Miller M. Diuretic action of three sulfonylurea drugs. Ann. Intern. Med. 1973;78(4):541–544. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-78-4-541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Moses AM, Numann P, Miller M. Mechanism of chlorpropamide-induced antidiuresis in man: evidence for release of ADH and enhancement of peripheral action. Metabolism. 1973;22(1):59–66. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(73)90029-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Adachi H, Yanai H. Adverse drug reaction: a possible case of glimepiride-induced syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion. Diabetes Metab. 2015;41(2):176–177. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2014.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Beukhof CM, Hoorn EJ, Lindemans J, Zietse R. Novel risk factors for hospital-acquired hyponatraemia: a matched case-control study. Clin. Endocrinol. 2007;66(3):367–372. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02741.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gin H, Lars I, Beauvieux JM, Morlat P, Aubertin J. Hyponatremia induced by biguanides. Case report. Presse Med. 1988;17(12):591. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Berker D, Aydin Y, Arduc A, Ustun I, Ergun B, Guler S. Severe hyponatremia due to rosiglitazone use in an elderly woman with diabetes mellitus: a rare cause of syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion. Endocr. Pr. 2008;14(8):1017–1019. doi: 10.4158/EP.14.8.1017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bustamante M, Hasler U, Kotova O, Chibalin AV, Mordasini D, Rousselot M, Vandewalle A, Martin PY, Feraille E. Insulin potentiates AVP-induced AQP2 expression in cultured renal collecting duct principal cells. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2005;288(2):F334–F344. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00180.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Refardt J, Winzeler B, Meienberg F, Vogt DR, Christ-Crain M. Empagliflozin increases short-term urinary volume output in artificially induced syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis. Int J. Endocrinol. 2017;2017:7815690. doi: 10.1155/2017/7815690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Falhammar H, Frisen L, Hirschberg AL, Norrby C, Almqvist C, Nordenskjold A, Nordenstrom A. Increased cardiovascular and metabolic morbidity in patients with 21-hydroxylase deficiency: a Swedish population-based national cohort study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015;100(9):3520–3528. doi: 10.1210/JC.2015-2093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wettermark B, Hammar N, Fored CM, Leimanis A, Otterblad Olausson P, Bergman U, Persson I, Sundstrom A, Westerholm B, Rosen M. The new Swedish prescribed drug register–opportunities for pharmacoepidemiological research and experience from the first six months. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2007;16(7):726–735. doi: 10.1002/pds.1294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Falhammar H, Frisen L, Norrby C, Almqvist C, Hirschberg AL, Nordenskjold A, Nordenstrom A. Reduced frequency of biological and increased frequency of adopted children in males with 21-hydroxylase deficiency: a Swedish population-based national cohort study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017;102(11):4191–4199. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-01139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.R.C Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2016). https://www.R-project.org/
  • 35.Karslioglu French E, Donihi AC, Korytkowski MT. Diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic syndrome: review of acute decompensated diabetes in adult patients. BMJ. 2019;365:l1114. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rado JR, Szende L, Marosi J. Influence of glyburide on the antidiuretic response induced by 1-deamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin (DDAVP) in patients with pituitary diabetes insipidus. Metabolism. 1974;23(11):1057–1063. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(74)90072-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yap PL, Harrower AD, Davidson NM, Strong JA. Glibenclamide and syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone. Br. Med J. 1977;1(6069):1137. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6069.1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Horita S, Seki G, Yamada H, Suzuki M, Koike K, Fujita T. Insulin resistance, obesity, hypertension, and renal sodium transport. Int J. Hypertens. 2011;2011:391762. doi: 10.4061/2011/391762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mazzitello C, Esposito S, De Francesco AE, Capuano A, Russo E, De Sarro G. Pharmacovigilance in Italy: An overview. J. Pharm. Pharmacother. 2013;4(Suppl 1):S20–S28. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.120942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sportiello L, Rafaniello C, Scavone C, Vitale C, Rossi F, Capuano A. The importance of pharmacovigilance for the drug safety: focus on cardiovascular profile of incretin-based therapy. Int J. Cardiol. 2016;202:731–735. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Endocrine are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES