Abstract
Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) with autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) can induce durable complete tumor regression in patients with advanced melanoma. Efforts are currently underway to expand this treatment modality to other cancer types. In the microenvironment of ovarian cancer, the engagement of co-inhibitory immune checkpoint molecules such as CTLA-4 can lead to the inactivation of TILs. Thus, approaches that directly manipulate co-inhibitory pathways within the tumor microenvironment might improve the expansion of tumor-reactive TILs. The initial expansion of TILs for ACT from tumor fragments provides a window of opportunity to manipulate an intact tumor microenvironment and improve CD8+ T-cell output and TIL tumor reactivity. To exploit this, we used a CTLA-4-blocking antibody, added during the initial TIL culture, and found that the blockade of CTLA-4 favored the propagation of CD8+ TILs from ovarian tumor fragments. Interestingly, adding the CTLA-4 blocking antibody in the initial phase of the TIL culture resulted in more potent anti-tumor TILs in comparison to standard TIL cultures. This phenotype was preserved during the rapid expansion phase. Thus, targeting CTLA-4 within the intact tumor microenvironment of tumor fragments enriches tumor-reactive TILs and may improve clinical outcome of TIL-based ACT in ovarian cancer.
Subject terms: Ovarian cancer, Immunotherapy, Translational research, Tumour immunology
Introduction
Ovarian cancer is the eighth most common cause of cancer death in women worldwide1. Ovarian cancer is often diagnosed at an advanced stage (e.g. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III or IV)2,3 and often characterized by a high tumor burden at diagnosis2. The primary treatments consist of platinum-based chemotherapy and surgery3, but the majority of patients with ovarian cancer relapse after the initial treatment3. The prognosis of advanced ovarian cancer is very poor, with a 5-year survival of 39% and 17% in stage III and IV, respectively4. Thus, more efficient treatment modalities are highly warranted.
Checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated clinical benefit in a small proportion of patients with ovarian cancer. Responses to checkpoint inhibitors have been reported consistently at rates below 15%5–9.
Several studies have previously demonstrated a positive prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in ovarian cancer. The presence of intraepithelial CD8+ cytotoxic TILs is associated with improved survival10–12. On the other hand, infiltration with regulatory T cells (Tregs), which can inhibit cytotoxic T cells, is associated with a poor prognosis13. Additionally, Sato et al. demonstrated that a high CD8+/Tregs ratio is associated with improved survival12.
Adoptive T-cell therapy (ACT) based on autologous TILs takes advantage of tumor-reactive T cells naturally present in the tumor lesions14 and has shown overall response rates of around 50% with durable complete responses in 15–20% of the patients in metastatic melanoma15–20. In addition, clinical responses in other epithelial cancers with ACT were recently reported by the NCI21. Clinical studies using ACT in ovarian cancer have demonstrated contradicting results22–24. A preclinical study and a phase I study treating six patients with metastatic ovarian cancer with ACT completed at our center have shown that ACT in metastatic ovarian cancer is feasible, but clinical responses were transient25,26. A phase I/II study combining ACT with checkpoint inhibitors has just been finalized (Kverneland et al., manuscript in preparation).
The studies mentioned above show that tumor-reactive T cells are present in ovarian cancer lesions, but the limited clinical effect suggests that they are possibly inhibited. The activity of TILs can be impeded by antigen-presenting cells or tumor cells through immune checkpoints such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) expressed on the T-cell surface, which can be blocked by checkpoint inhibitors such as ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4), nivolumab and pembrolizumab (both anti-PD-1)27.
In previous TIL trials in metastatic melanoma, a high number of infused TILs and a large proportion of CD8+ T cells in the infusion product have been associated with better clinical outcome18. Also, TIL reactivity towards autologous tumor cell lines in vitro has been associated with clinical outcome28. In this study, we hypothesized that directly manipulating co-inhibitory pathways within the initial tumor fragment cultures for ACT might improve the expansion of tumor-reactive TILs from ovarian tumor fragments. In order to block the co-inhibitory pathway, a CTLA-4-targeting antibody was added during the TIL expansion. Subsequently, the phenotype and functionality were analyzed by flow cytometry and the T-cell clonality was analyzed by T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing.
Results
Demographics of patient samples
Ovarian cancer metastatic lesions were collected from 14 ovarian cancer patients that underwent surgery between 2014 and 2018 with an ECOG performance status 0–1. The patients were primarily diagnosed with ovarian cancer FIGO stage IIIc-IV between 2010 and 2017. The median time from diagnosis to tumor removal was three years and the patients had received a median of four lines of therapy at that time.
The samples were attained from three different clinical protocols performed at our center. One patient (EOC.TIL.27) had a tumor removed as part of the standard care, while the others underwent tumor removal as part of a clinical trial with adoptive cell therapy (GY1508 and GY1721 - NCT02482090 and NCT03287674). The latest cohort (GY1721) also received one dose of ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) two weeks prior to tumor removal as part of the clinical trial.
Expansion and phenotype of ovarian cancer TILs
Resected tumor lesions were cut into 1 to 3 mm3 small fragments. One fragment was plated per well and cultured in media containing 6,000 IU/ml IL-2. TIL cultures could be established in 9 of 14 patients (64%) as shown in Fig. 1A. Median days in culture were 29 (range [16–36] days) with a median number of 2.87 × 106 (range [0–22.5 × 106]) TILs recovered per fragment. Next, we evaluated whether TILs could be expanded to clinically relevant numbers using a two-week rapid expansion protocol (REP)29. If TIL cultures could not be established, TILs previously established in the clinical studies (Trial Number NCT02482090 and NCT03287674) were used. The median fold expansion was 1,300 (range [323–2,594]) (Fig. 1B).
Subsequently, we determined the phenotype of the TIL cultures before and after expansion using flow cytometry. As shown in Fig. 2A, the majority of cells in both TIL cultures expressed CD3 and CD4. There was no difference in the distribution of CD3+, CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in TIL cultures before and after expansion. We also determined the memory phenotype of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Naïve (TN), central memory (TCM), effector memory (TEM) and effector memory cells re-expressing CD45RA (TEMRA) were defined as CD45RA+ CD62L+, CD45RA− CD62L+, CD45RA− CD62L− and CD45RA+ CD62L−, respectively. The majority of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in initial TIL cultures were TEM (Fig. 2B). In CD8+ T cells, the fraction of TEM increased significantly after the expansion (p-value = 0.0007), while the fraction of TN, TCM and TEMRA decreased significantly (p-values = 0.03, 0.05 and 0.0002). In CD4+ cells, TN and TEMRA fractions decreased significantly after the rapid expansion (p-values = 0.01 and 0.008). These results suggest that TILs from patients with ovarian cancer expanded to clinically relevant numbers mainly consist of CD3+ CD4+ T cells with a TEM phenotype.
Expansion of TILs after the addition of anti-CTLA-4 antibody
We hypothesized that ovarian cancer TILs might be inactivated through co-inhibitory interactions such as the immune checkpoint CTLA-4. Thus, we tested the effect of blocking this interaction by adding anti-CTLA-4 antibody to the TIL cultures. CTLA-4 blockade promoted TIL growth from tumor fragments of 13 out of 14 (93%) patients compared to TIL growth from 9 out of 14 (64%) patients when tumor fragments were cultured in standard IL-2 conditions. Median culture time was 29 days (range [16–36] days) for both culture conditions with a significantly increased number of TILs recovered from TIL cultures supplemented with anti-CTLA-4 with a median of 9.65 × 106 cells per fragment (range [0.8–28.1 × 106], Fig. 3A,B) compared to a median number of 2.87 × 106 (range [0–22.5 × 106]]) for TIL cultures (p-value = 0.001) with only IL-2. The outgrowth of TILs from tumor fragments was higher in 12 of 14 patients when cultured with anti-CTLA-4 antibody. Interestingly, the increase in TIL growth was more profound when using tumor fragments from patients not pre-treated with anti-CTLA-4 antibody before TIL therapy compared to those pre-treated (Table 1, Trial Number NCT02482090 and NCT03287674).
Table 1.
Sample ID | Previous anti-CTLA-4 treatment | Condition | Number of fragments | Total TIL number (×106) | TILs per fragment (×106) | Expansion time (Days) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GY1508.05 | No | IL-2 | 4 | 0.1 | 0.03 | 35 |
IL-2 + anti-CTLA-4 | 4 | 31.2 | 7.8 | 35 | ||
GY1508.06 | No | IL-2 | 10 | 20 | 2 | 30 |
IL-2 + anti-CTLA-4 | 10 | 196 | 19.6 | 28 | ||
GY1508.07 | No | IL-2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 32 |
IL-2 + anti-CTLA-4 | 6 | 37 | 6.17 | 32 | ||
GY1508.08 | No | IL-2 | 8 | 38 | 4.75 | 33 |
IL-2 + anti-CTLA-4 | 8 | 16.1 | 2.01 | 33 | ||
GY1508.09 | No | IL-2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 25 |
IL-2 + anti-CTLA-4 | 8 | 6.4 | 0.80 | 32 | ||
GY1508.10 | No | IL-2 | 8 | 24.2 | 3.03 | 28 |
IL-2 + anti-CTLA-4 | 8 | 72.4 | 9.05 | 26 | ||
GY1508.11 | No | IL-2 | 8 | 74 | 9.25 | 26 |
IL-2 + anti-CTLA-4 | 4 | 41 | 10.25 | 26 | ||
EOC.TIL.27 | No | IL-2 | 12 | 15.4 | 1.28 | 35 |
IL-2 + anti-CTLA-4 | 12 | 90 | 7.50 | 35 | ||
GY1721.01 | Yes | IL-2 | 8 | 84.9 | 10.61 | 18 |
IL-2 + anti-CTLA-4 | 8 | 117.6 | 14.70 | 18 | ||
GY1721.02 | Yes | IL-2 | 8 | 21.7 | 2.71 | 32 |
IL-2 + anti-CTLA-4 | 8 | 120.7 | 15.09 | 30 | ||
GY1721.03 | Yes | IL-2 | 8 | 180.2 | 22.53 | 21 |
IL-2 + anti-CTLA-4 | 8 | 224.9 | 28.11 | 21 | ||
GY1721.04 | Yes | IL-2 | 8 | 56.7 | 7.09 | 25 |
IL-2 + anti-CTLA-4 | 8 | 100.2 | 12.53 | 22 | ||
GY1721.05 | Yes | IL-2 | 8 | 84.5 | 10.56 | 16 |
IL-2 + anti-CTLA-4 | 8 | 56.2 | 7.03 | 16 | ||
GY1721.07 | Yes | IL-2 | 4 | 4.2 | 1.04 | 36 |
IL-2 + anti-CTLA-4 | 6 | 97.9 | 16.32 | 36 |
To test the effect of CTLA-4 blockade during the rapid expansion, each TIL culture was expanded with either IL-2 in a standard REP or by additionally adding anti-CTLA-4 antibody on day 0 and day 7 during the REP, thereby generating expanded TILs in four conditions. The median fold expansion in all conditions was higher than 1,300-fold (Fig. 3C). Adding CTLA-4 antibody during the REP did not affect the fold expansion of TILs. However, TILs subjected to CTLA-4 blockade during tumor fragment cultures expanded to greater levels compared to TILs from tumor fragment cultures in IL-2 only (median 1,600 and 1,800-fold vs. 1,300 and 1,400-fold). Thus, CTLA-4 blockade of TILs during the early expansion phase improves the total numbers of TILs derived from ovarian tumor fragments.
Phenotype of TILs after CTLA-4 blockade
Next, we evaluated the effect of CTLA-blockade on the phenotype of TILs during initial TIL growth and after expansion. Flow cytometric analysis showed no difference in the number of CD3+ T cells before or after cell expansion irrespective of CTLA-4 blockade (Supplementary Fig. S1). In contrast, the proportion of CD8+ T cells was increased in TIL cultures when anti-CTLA-4 antibody was added to the tumor fragments during the initial TIL growth compared to TIL outgrowth when cultured only with IL-2 (Fig. 4A–C and Supplementary Table S1). In addition, the proportion of CD4+ cells was decreased in a corresponding manner (Fig. 4A–C and Supplementary Table S2). Also, a significantly higher number of CD8+ T cells were recovered per fragment after CTLA-4 blockade (Fig. 4D). Importantly, the proportion of CD8+ T cells recovered from tumor fragments after CTLA-4 blockade was sustained when TIL cultures were rapidly expanded (Fig. 4E,F). Thus, the addition of anti-CTLA-4 antibody during the initial TIL culture increases the proportion of CD8+ T cells in ovarian cancer TILs and leads to an increased amount of CD8+ T cells after the rapid expansion without additional anti-CTLA-4 antibody during the rapid expansion.
The effect of CTLA-4 blockade on the outgrowth of T-cell subsets was further examined using flow cytometry to determine the expression of activation and co-stimulatory markers, and the expression of exhaustion markers. A majority of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in initial TIL cultures with or without CTLA-4 blockade had a TEM phenotype (Supplementary Fig. S2). In CD4+ T cells, the proportion of TEMRA cells was reduced in TILs supplemented with anti-CTLA-4 antibody compared to TILs cultured with IL-2 alone (Supplementary Fig. S2). There was no difference in any of the activation and co-stimulatory markers CD27, CD28, CD56, CD69, CD137 and the exhaustion markers LAG-3, BTLA, TIM-3, PD-1 and CD57 in the initial TIL cultures (Supplementary Fig. S2). Furthermore, there was no difference in the expression of ICOS or CTLA-4 in the initial TIL cultures (Supplementary Fig. S2).
In the expanded TILs, the majority of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells were TEM and the expression of most activation, co-stimulatory and exhaustion markers was comparable (Supplementary Fig. S3). Only the expression of CD69 in CD4+ T cells was lower in TILs expanded from anti-CTLA-4 supplemented TILs compared to those expanded from non-supplemented TILs (p-value = 0.04). The expression of ICOS was lower on CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in TILs expanded from initial TIL cultures supplemented with anti-CTLA-4 antibody compared to those expanded from non-supplemented TIL cultures (Supplementary Fig. S3, p-values = 0.02 and 0.15). These results indicate that the addition of anti-CTLA-4 antibody during the initial TIL expansion does not induce major changes in the memory phenotype, the activation or the exhaustion state of expanded TILs. Moreover, there were no differences in the memory phenotype, the expression of activation and co-stimulatory markers and the expression of exhaustion markers when anti-CTLA-4 antibody was added during the rapid expansion (Supplementary Figs. S4 and S5).
Reactivity of TILs to autologous tumors
Next, we tested whether TIL cultures were able to recognize autologous tumor cell lines. In four of the fourteen patients included, tumor cell lines could be established, and the tumor reactivity of the TILs was tested. We co-cultured TILs and autologous tumor cell lines for five hours in the presence of Golgi-Plug and measured the expression of CD107a and the intracellular accumulation of TNF and IFN-γ. Tumor-reactive T cells were defined as cells expressing CD107a or secreting one of the cytokines30.
Reactivity against autologous tumor cell lines was detected in three out of four patient TIL cultures before expansion, while all rapidly expanded TILs were able to recognize the autologous tumor cell line (Fig. 5A). The median proportion of tumor-reactive T cells was 0.75% in initial TILs and 0.9% in expanded TIL cultures (Fig. 5B). Tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells could be detected in pre-expanded TIL cultures from one out of four patients, and in two out of four TIL cultures after expansion (Fig. 5C,D). For CD4+ T cells, tumor reactivity was detected in three out of four TIL cultures, both before and after cell expansion (Fig. 5E,F).
We next tested whether the tumor-reactive potential of TILs was affected by the addition of anti-CTLA-4 antibody during TIL culture. As shown in Fig. 5, the provision of CTLA-4 blockade to the tumor fragments yielded a higher number of tumor-reactive T cells before and after rapid expansion. The majority of the reactive cells were CD8+ T cells (Fig. 5C,D). The addition of anti-CTLA-4 antibody during the rapid expansion did not change the tumor reactivity of TILs and CD8+ T cells. Reactivity of CD4+ T cells was generally low compared to CD8+ T-cell tumor reactivity (Fig. 5E,F). The majority of tumor-reactive TILs expressed CD107a or secreted TNF (Fig. 6A). An increased proportion of CD8+ T cells in the initial TILs supplemented with anti-CTLA-4 antibody compared to non-supplemented TILs secreted TNF and IFN-γ and expressed CD107a upon co-culture with autologous tumor cell lines (Fig. 6A). This phenomenon is preserved in expanded TILs independent of the addition of anti-CTLA-4 during the rapid expansion. Cytokine production (TNF and IFN-γ) and CD107a mobilization in CD8+ T cells in expanded TILs of one representative patient are shown in Fig. 6B,C. Overall, these experiments demonstrate that the addition of anti-CTLA-4 antibody in the tumor fragment cultures can improve the expansion of tumor-reactive TILs.
TCR repertoire analysis
In order to investigate whether the addition of anti-CTLA-4 antibody during TIL expansion remodels TCR repertoire, we performed TCR repertoire analysis on initial TIL cultures supplemented with or without anti-CTLA-4 antibody and on REP cultures expanded from these without the addition of anti-CTLA-4 antibody from 12 patients. The addition of anti-CTLA-4 antibody to TIL cultures did not result in a change in TRB (gene encoding the TCR β chain) diversity or evenness (Supplementary Fig. S6). However, although not significant, there was an increase in TRB richness in initial or expanded cultures when anti-CTLA-4 antibody was added (Fig. 6D).
Discussion
Given the potential that TIL therapy holds for the treatment of metastatic disease, identifying methodologies to enrich and expand tumor-reactive TILs may improve clinical outcomes of TIL-based ACT in ovarian cancer. In this study, we have shown that the addition of anti-CTLA-4 antibody to tumor fragments from metastatic ovarian cancer does not only promote the outgrowth of TILs but also favors the propagation of CD8+ T cells and thus enhances the anti-tumor reactivity of TILs. These findings are important in overcoming the challenges of TIL-based ACT in recurrent ovarian cancer.
In metastatic melanoma, a high number of infused TILs, a high proportion of CD8+ T cells and TIL reactivity towards autologous tumor cell lines in vitro have previously been associated with improved clinical outcome18,28. In earlier TIL trials in ovarian cancer, response rates have generally been lower compared to metastatic melanoma16,22,24,31. Possible explanations could be lower numbers of infused TILs, lower proportions of CD8+ T cells in the infusion product and lower TIL reactivity. The latter could in turn be due to a lower mutational burden in other types of cancer compared to melanoma32. However, induction of durable clinical responses with TIL therapy is possible in other cancers than melanoma, if the expansion method favors the reactive T-cell clones21,33.
In this study, we show increased TIL proliferation, increased proportion of CD8+ T cells and increased TIL reactivity towards autologous tumor cell lines in vitro when CTLA-4 blockade was introduced during the initial TIL expansion from ovarian tumor fragments. TIL cultures subjected to CTLA-4 blockade did also expand into greater numbers after rapid expansion when compared to standard IL-2 culture conditions.
In line with these results, a recent clinical study conducted at our center did also show increased TIL proliferation and in-vitro tumor reactivity when patients with ovarian cancer were pre-treated with one dose of ipilimumab before resection of tumor material for preparation of ACT (Kverneland et al., manuscript in preparation). Our results also corroborate findings in another study at our center that has shown more frequent T-cell responses against common tumor antigens in patients treated with ipilimumab as compared to anti-CTLA-4 naïve patients with metastatic melanoma34. Another study demonstrated that blockade of CTLA-4 and PD-1 increased proliferation of murine colon carcinoma and ovarian carcinoma TILs expressing these immune checkpoints35. In melanoma, triple blockade of BTLA-4, TIM-3 and PD-1 was shown to enhance the expansion and proliferation of specific CD8+ PBMCs36.
Fewer CD4+ TILs expanded from initial TIL cultures supplemented with anti-CTLA-4 expressed CD69 compared to those expanded without anti-CTLA-4. Han et al. have shown a regulatory function of CD69 on Tregs in mice37. Thus, a reduced expression of CD69 by CD4+ T cells could indicate a reduced suppressive activity and could allow an increased cytotoxicity of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells. Moreover, suppression by Tregs seems to be mediated by the inhibition of the IL-2 receptor anti-chain induced by CTLA-4 and membrane-bound TGF-β137. This interaction is blocked in the in-vitro TIL cultures by anti-CTLA-4. CD69+ Tregs have been shown to express higher levels of suppressive markers, such as ICOS38. An increased expression of ICOS has previously been shown in Tregs in TILs compared to peripheral Tregs. It was associated with an increased expression of Treg markers, the secretion of IL-10 and a stronger suppressive activity39–42. Importantly, we found that ICOS expression was reduced on both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in TILs expanded from initial TIL cultures supplemented with anti-CTLA-4 antibody. We determined the frequency of Tregs in the patients with a profound increase of CD8+ cells when the initial TIL culture was treated with anti-CTLA-4 antibody using flow cytometry. The proportion of Tregs (CD4+CD25+CD127lowFoxP3+) within the CD3+ compartment was reduced in 3 out of 4 patients (data not shown). Further, a recent study comparing ovarian cancer-Tregs with melanoma-Tregs demonstrated an increased activation state and a more suppressive effect of ovarian cancer-Tregs on CD8+ T cells compared to melanoma-Tregs43. This could explain the effect of anti-CTLA-4 antibody on the ovarian cancer TIL cultures, but no effect on melanoma TIL cultures (data not shown). Another study conducted at our center showed a reduced Treg infiltration of the TME when patients with ovarian cancer were treated with one dose of ipilimumab before resection of tumor material for preparation of ACT with autologous TILs compared to patients that were not pre-treated with ipilimumab (Westergaard et al., manuscript in preparation).
The diversity of the TCR repertoire, which reflects the clonal composition of T cells may be a predictive marker of response to cancer immunotherapy44,45. Previous reports have shown that anti-CTLA-4 treatment leads to a significant broadening of CD8+ T-cell responses specific for melanoma and an increased diversity of T cells in blood after CTLA-4 blockade46,47.
In the present study, TCR repertoire analysis did not show any difference in TRB diversity or evenness in TILs cultured with or without anti-CTLA-4 antibody. Although we found that TIL subjected to CTLA-4 blockade did show a moderate increase in TRB richness, this, however, was not significant. It is highly likely that the overall sample size was too small to detect a statistically significant difference in these groups and further investigation is warranted to explore whether CTLA-4 blockade affects the clonality or diversity of TCR clones.
In conclusion, we show that targeting CTLA-4 within the initial tumor fragment cultures for ACT in ovarian cancer, increases TIL proliferation and favors the expansion of tumor-reactive CD8+ TILs. These results warrant clinical testing of the addition of an anti-CTLA-4 antibody during the initial TIL expansion phase to improve ACT using TILs in this hard-to-treat population.
Material and Methods
Patient material
We obtained metastatic tumor lesions from 14 individual patients with histologically verified ovarian cancer. Seven patients participated in a phase I clinical trial (Trial Number NCT02482090) and 6 patients in a phase I/II clinical trial (Trial Number NCT03287674) at CCIT, Herlev Hospital (Herlev, Denmark). Additionally, we obtained a metastatic lesion from one patient in a preclinical study to evaluate TIL therapy for ovarian cancer.
Generation of TIL cultures
The majority of TIL cultures were established from freshly resected tumor lesions, which were immediately transported to the laboratory and cut into 1 to 3 mm3 fragments. For three patients, fragments cryopreserved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were used to establish initial TIL cultures. Fragments were placed into individual wells of a 24-well plate (Nunc, 142475) with 2 ml of complete medium (CM) consisting of RPMI1640 with GlutaMAX, 25 mM HEPES pH 7.2 (Gibco, 72400–021), 10% heat-inactivated human AB serum (HS; Sigma-Aldrich, H4522–100ML), 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg⁄ml streptomycin (Gibco, 15140-122), 1.25 μg/ml Fungizone (Bristol-Myers Squibb, 49182) and 6,000 IU⁄ml Interleukin 2 (IL-2; Proleukin, Novartis, 004184). Where indicated, 5 μg/ml anti-CTLA-4 (Bristol Myers Squibb) was added to the initial TIL cultures. The 24-well plates were placed in a humidified 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2. Half of the medium was replaced three times per week. Initial TIL cultures were established in vitro according to the young TIL method by pooling TIL cultures derived from separate fragments48. TIL cultures were considered established when more than 2 × 106 cells/fragment could be generated within 35 days in one of the two culture conditions. In order to limit differences in culture time of initial TILs under different conditions from the same patient, all initial TILs from one patient were harvested within three days. TILs were further expanded in a small-scale version of the 14-day rapid expansion protocol, as previously described29. Here, freshly generated TILs or cryopreserved TILs rested in CM for two days were used. Briefly, 1 × 105 TIL, 2 × 107 allogeneic feeder cells from healthy donors, 30 ng/ml OKT3 antibody (anti-CD3, Janssen-Cilag, 24639 G), master mix made of 50% CM and 50% rapid expansion medium (RM) consisting of AIM-V medium (Gibco, 12055-083) and 1.25 μg⁄ml Fungizone supplemented with 6,000 IU⁄ml IL-2 with 10% HS were mixed in T25 tissue culture flasks (Nunc, 156367) and cultured at 37 °C in 5% CO2. On day 0 and 7, 5 μg/ml anti-CTLA-4 was added to the respective cultures. The rapid expansion of each setup was performed in duplicates. Cells were split into larger flasks and additional media was added in order to keep a cell density between 1–2 × 106 cells/ml. The expansion fold was determined on day 7, 9, 12 and 14 of the rapid expansion and TILs were harvested and cryopreserved on day 14 of the expansion.
Tumor cell cultures
Tumor cell lines were established either directly from tumor fragments, from media used for transportation of the tumor specimen or from enzymatically digested fresh tumor fragments and validated by Cytospin centrifugation of the cell suspension for morphologic evaluation and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded followed by immunohistochemistry staining for various ovarian cancer markers; CA125, EpCAM, PAX8, p16, p53, CK7, the mesothelial cell marker Calretinin and the proliferation marker Ki67. R10 medium consisting of RPMI1640 with GlutaMAX, 25 mM HEPES pH 7.2, 100 U⁄ml penicillin, 100 μg⁄ml streptomycin and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, 10270–106) was used for culturing tumor cell lines.
Phenotypic characterization of TIL
Staining of both initial and expanded TILs was performed on fresh cells or cells rested in RPMI1640 with GlutaMAX, 25 mM HEPES pH 7.2, 100 U⁄ml penicillin, 100 μg⁄ml streptomycin with 10% HS overnight. The cells were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Lonza, BE176-512F), stained at 4 °C for 30 minutes, washed and resuspended in PBS. The fluorochrome-labeled monoclonal antibodies BV510 CD, PerCP CD4, BV421 CD8, FITC CD45RA, PE CD27, PE-Cy7 C-C chemokine receptor type 7 (CCR7), APC CD62L, FITC CD57, PE inducible T-cell co-stimulator (ICOS), PE-Cy7 CD69, APC CD28, FITC CD16, PE CD137, PE-Cy7 CD56, APC CTLA-4, FITC lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3), PE B- and T-lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA), PE-Cy7 PD-1 and APC T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 (TIM-3) were used. The manufacturer information and clones are listed in Supplementary Table S3. The stained cells were analyzed with a FACS Canto II instrument (BD Biosciences). The gating strategy is shown in Supplementary Fig. S7.
Evaluation of tumor reactivity
Anti-tumor reactivity of in vitro expanded TILs was evaluated after co-culture of the TILs with autologous tumor cell lines pretreated with 100 IU/ml IFN-γ (Peprotech, 300-02-100UG) in a ratio of 3:1 for 5 hours. Golgi plug (BD Biosciences, 51-2301KZ) and BV421 CD107a were added at the beginning of incubation and TILs were stained with Near-IR Live/Dead (Life Technologies, L10119) and for surface markers FITC CD3, PE CD56, QDot605 CD8 and PerCP CD4. Subsequently, the cells were fixed and permeabilized (eBioscience, 00-5123-43, 00-5223-56 and 00-8333-56) overnight and stained for intracellular cytokines APC TNF and PE-Cy7 IFN-γ. The manufacturer information and clones of the flow cytometry antibodies are listed in Supplementary Table S4. The TILs were analyzed with a FACS Canto II. Tumor-reactive TILs were defined as T cells expressing either TNF, IFN-γ or CD107a. The response in an unstimulated sample (negative control) was subtracted from the stimulated samples. The gating strategy is shown in Supplementary Fig. S8.
RNA sequencing and TCR analysis
RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed on initial TIL cultures with (n = 12) and without (n = 12) anti-CTLA-4 antibody supplement, and on REP cultures (n = 24) expanded from these initial TILs without the addition of anti-CTLA-4 (total n = 48) as previously described49. After demultiplexing, the sequences were analyzed using MiXCR50,51 version 3.0.3 (command: mixcr analyze shotgun; parameters:–species hs–starting-material rna–only-productive). VDJtools52 was applied to MiXCR output to derive TRB diversity, richness and evenness, using command CalcDiversityStats.
Data and statistical analysis
Data analyses were carried out in Excel 2010 and Graphpad Prism 5. The change in the TIL expansion and phenotypic subpopulations was investigated for the statistical difference using Wilcoxon matched-pairs rank test. A two-sided p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Ethics approval
The Danish National Committee on Health Research Ethics approved the scientific use of the patient material.
Accordance
The study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.
Consent for publication
All patients included in the study have signed informed consent to participate.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the laboratory technicians Susanne Wendt, Sandra Ullitz Færch and Betina Saxild for their invaluable help with preparation of tumor material and the cell culture. The studies were supported by grants from the OvaCure Foundation, the Danish Cancer Society Research Foundation, the Anticancer Fund and Aase og Ejnar Danielsens Foundation.
Author contributions
C.F. and Ö.M. conceived and designed experiments and developed methodology. C.F., K.H., M.C.W.W., M.P. and A.K. acquired data. C.F., K.H., T.H.B., G.J., M.D., M.C.W.W and Ö.M. analyzed and interpreted data. C.F., K.H., T.H.B., M.C.W.W., A.K., M.D., I.M.S. and Ö.M. revised the manuscript. I.M.S. and Ö.M. supervised the study. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.
Data availability
Data and material generated and analyzed during the current study can be available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors jointly supervised this work: Inge Marie Svane and Özcan Met.
Contributor Information
Inge Marie Svane, Email: inge.marie.svane@regionh.dk.
Özcan Met, Email: ozcan.met@regionh.dk.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-60738-4.
References
- 1.Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA. Cancer J. Clin. 2009;55:74–108. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Coleman RL, Monk BJ, Sood AK, Herzog TJ. Latest research and treatment of advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2013;10:211–224. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Herzog TJ, Pothuri B. Ovarian cancer: a focus on management of recurrent disease. Nat. Clin. Pract. Oncol. 2006;3:604–611. doi: 10.1038/ncponc0637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Torre LA, et al. Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018. CA. Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68:284–296. doi: 10.3322/caac.21456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hamanishi J, et al. Safety and antitumor activity of anti-PD-1 antibody, nivolumab, in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015;33:4015–4022. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.3397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Varga A, et al. Antitumor activity and safety of pembrolizumab in patients (pts) with PD-L1 positive advanced ovarian cancer: Interim results from a phase Ib study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015;33:5510–5510. doi: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.5510. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Disis ML, et al. Avelumab (MSB0010718C; anti-PD-L1) in patients with recurrent/refractory ovarian cancer from the JAVELIN Solid Tumor phase Ib trial: Safety and clinical activity. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016;34:5533–5533. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.5533. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brahmer JR, et al. Safety and activity of anti–PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:2455–2465. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.ClinicalTrials.gov. Phase II study of ipilimumab monotherapy in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer - study results. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT01611558 (2017).
- 10.Clarke B, et al. Intraepithelial T cells and prognosis in ovarian carcinoma: novel associations with stage, tumor type and BRCA1 loss. Mod. Pathol. 2009;22:393–402. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2008.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Honjo T, et al. Programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 and tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T lymphocytes are prognostic factors of human ovarian cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2007;104:3360–3365. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611533104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sato E, et al. Intraepithelial CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and a high CD8+/regulatory T cell ratio are associated with favorable prognosis in ovarian cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2005;102:18538–18543. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509182102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Curiel TJ, et al. Specific recruitment of regulatory T cells in ovarian carcinoma fosters immune privilege and predicts reduced survival. Nat. Med. 2004;10:942–949. doi: 10.1038/nm1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rosenberg SA, Restifo NP. Adoptive cell transfer as personalized immunotherapy for human cancer. Science. 2015;348:62–68. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa4967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rosenberg SA, et al. Durable complete responses in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic melanoma using T-cell transfer immunotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011;17:4550–4557. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Andersen R, et al. Long-lasting complete responses in patients with metastatic melanoma after adoptive cell therapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and an attenuated IL2 regimen. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016;22:3734–3745. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Besser MJ, et al. Adoptive transfer of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with metastatic melanoma: intent-to-treat analysis and efficacy after failure to prior immunotherapies. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013;19:4792–4800. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Radvanyi LG, et al. Specific lymphocyte subsets predict response to adoptive cell therapy using expanded autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in metastatic melanoma patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012;18:6758–6770. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pilon-Thomas S, et al. Efficacy of adoptive cell transfer of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes after lymphopenia induction for metastatic melanoma. J. Immunother. 2012;35:615–620. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e31826e8f5f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Met Ö, Jensen KM, Chamberlain CA, Donia M, Svane IM. Principles of adoptive T cell therapy in cancer. Semin. Immunopathol. 2019;41:49–58. doi: 10.1007/s00281-018-0703-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Stevanovic S, et al. Complete regression of metastatic cervical cancer after treatment with human papillomavirus–targeted tumor-infiltrating T cells. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015;33:1543–1550. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.9093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Aoki Y, et al. Use of adoptive transfer of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes alone or in combination with cisplatin-containing chemotherapy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 1991;51:1934–1939. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fujita K, et al. Prolonged disease-free period in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after adoptive transfer of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Clin. Cancer Res. 1995;1:501–507. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Freedman RS, et al. Intraperitoneal adoptive immunotherapy of ovarian carcinoma with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and low-dose recombinant interleukin-2: a pilot trial. J. Immunother. Emphasis Tumor Immunol. 1994;16:198–210. doi: 10.1097/00002371-199410000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pedersen M, et al. Adoptive cell therapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with metastatic ovarian cancer: a pilot study. Oncoimmunology. 2018;7:e1502905. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1502905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Westergaard MCW, et al. Tumour-reactive T cell subsets in the microenvironment of ovarian cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 2019;120:424–434. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0384-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pennock GK, Chow LQM. The evolving role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer treatment. Oncologist. 2015;20:812–822. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Donia M, et al. Methods to improve adoptive T-cell therapy for melanoma: IFN-γ enhances anticancer responses of cell products for infusion. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2013;133:545–552. doi: 10.1038/jid.2012.336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Donia M, et al. Characterization and comparison of ‘standard’ and ‘young’ tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes for adoptive cell therapy at a danish translational research institution. Scand. J. Immunol. 2012;75:157–167. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2011.02640.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Aktas E, Kucuksezer UC, Bilgic S, Erten G, Deniz G. Relationship between CD107a expression and cytotoxic activity. Cell. Immunol. 2009;254:149–154. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2008.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rosenberg SA, et al. Durable complete responses in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic melanoma using T-cell transfer immunotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011;17:4550–4557. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Alexandrov LB, et al. Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature. 2013;500:415–421. doi: 10.1038/nature12477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tran E, et al. Cancer immunotherapy based on mutation-specific CD4+ T cells in a patient with epithelial cancer. Science. 2014;344:641–645. doi: 10.1126/science.1251102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bjoern J, et al. Influence of ipilimumab on expanded tumour derived T cells from patients with metastatic melanoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8:27062–27074. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Duraiswamy J, Freeman GJ, Coukos G. Dual blockade of PD-1 and CTLA-4 combined with tumor vaccine effectively restores T-cell rejection function in tumors. Cancer Res. 2014;74:633–634. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fourcade J, et al. CD8+ T cells specific for tumor antigens can be rendered dysfunctional by the tumor microenvironment through upregulation of the inhibitory receptors BTLA and PD-1. Cancer Res. 2012;72:887–896. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhang M, Chen Z, Han Y, Cao X, Guo Q. CD69+CD4+CD25− T cells, a new subset of regulatory T cells, suppress T cell proliferation through membrane-bound TGF-β1. J. Immunol. 2014;182:111–120. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.182.1.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yu L, et al. CD69 enhances immunosuppressive function of regulatory T-cells and attenuates colitis by prompting IL-10 production. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:905. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0927-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Strauss L, et al. Expression of ICOS on human melanoma-infiltrating CD4+CD25highFoxp3+ T regulatory cells: implications and impact on tumor-mediated immune suppression. J. Immunol. 2008;180:2967–2980. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.5.2967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Giraldo NA, et al. Tumor-infiltrating and peripheral blood T-cell immunophenotypes predict early relapse in localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017;23:4416–4428. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Liakou CI, et al. CTLA-4 blockade increases IFN -producing CD4+ICOShi cells to shift the ratio of effector to regulatory T cells in cancer patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2008;105:14987–14992. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806075105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Löhning M, et al. Expression of ICOS in vivo defines CD4+ effector T cells with high inflammatory potential and a strong bias for secretion of interleukin 10. J. Exp. Med. 2003;197:181–193. doi: 10.1084/jem.20020632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Toker A, et al. Regulatory T cells in ovarian cancer are characterized by a highly activated phenotype distinct from that in melanoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018;24:5685–5696. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hogan SA, et al. Peripheral blood TCR repertoire profiling may facilitate patient stratification for immunotherapy against melanoma. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2019;7:77–85. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Roh, W. et al. Integrated molecular analysis of tumor biopsies on sequential CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade reveals markers of response and resistance. Sci. Transl. Med. 9 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 46.Kvistborg P, et al. Anti-CTLA-4 therapy broadens the melanoma-reactive CD8+ T cell response. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014;6:254ra128. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Robert L, et al. CTLA4 blockade broadens the peripheral T-cell receptor repertoire. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014;20:2424–2432. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tran KQ, et al. Minimally cultured tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes display optimal characteristics for adoptive cell therapy. J. Immunother. 2008;31:742–751. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e31818403d5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lauss M, et al. Mutational and putative neoantigen load predict clinical benefit of adoptive T cell therapy in melanoma. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1738. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01460-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bolotin DA, et al. MiXCR: Software for comprehensive adaptive immunity profiling. Nat. Methods. 2015;12:380–381. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bolotin DA, et al. Antigen receptor repertoire profiling from RNA-seq data. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017;35:908–911. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Shugay Mikhail, Bagaev Dmitriy V., Turchaninova Maria A., Bolotin Dmitriy A., Britanova Olga V., Putintseva Ekaterina V., Pogorelyy Mikhail V., Nazarov Vadim I., Zvyagin Ivan V., Kirgizova Vitalina I., Kirgizov Kirill I., Skorobogatova Elena V., Chudakov Dmitriy M. VDJtools: Unifying Post-analysis of T Cell Receptor Repertoires. PLOS Computational Biology. 2015;11(11):e1004503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data and material generated and analyzed during the current study can be available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.