Skip to main content
Blood Cancer Journal logoLink to Blood Cancer Journal
letter
. 2020 Mar 3;10(3):27. doi: 10.1038/s41408-020-0293-6

A shared somatic translocation involving CUX1 in monozygotic twins as an early driver of AMKL in Down syndrome

Iben Bache 1,2,, Karin Wadt 2, Mana M Mehrjouy 1,3, Maria Rossing 4, Olga Østrup 4, Anna Byrjalsen 2,3, Niels Tommerup 1, Marlen Metzner 5, Paresh Vyas 5,6, Kjeld Schmiegelow 3,7, Birgitte Lausen 3, Mette K Andersen 2
PMCID: PMC7054393  PMID: 32127516

Dear Editor,

Children with Down syndrome (DS) have an increased risk of developing leukemia1, especially acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (AMKL) preceded by a somatic GATA1 mutation and often by the neonatal syndrome transient abnormal myelopoiesis (TAM)2. However, progression into AMKL occurs only in ~20% of the TAM patients3. Hence, the development of DS–AMKL can be described by three phases: (i) a disturbance of the natural fetal hematopoiesis due to the constitutional trisomy 21; (ii) a somatic GATA1 mutation and in most patients TAM; (iii) progression into AMKL if additional somatic mutations occur in a dormant GATA1-mutated clone. The acquired mutations found in the third phase vary between patients, and can include cytogenetic abnormalities like loss of chromosome 7, gain of chromosomes 8, 14, and 21, duplication 1q4,5, and single-gene mutations, e.g., in the cohesin protein family, signaling molecules, and epigenetic regulators6,7. However, little is known about the developmental timing of the third-hit mutations, which are essential for the DS–AMKL progression.

Monozygotic twins concordant for a hematological disease with identical clonal mutations are rare but have been crucial in ascertaining the prenatal development of somatic mutations in acute leukemia8, essential thrombocythemia9, and DS–AMKL10. Here, we report for the first time a monozygotic twin pair concordant for AMKL that besides a shared somatic GATA1 mutation also shares a unique somatic mutation that must have arisen prenatally in an early preleukemic clone, and therefore is likely to be an early driver of the transformation into AMKL.

The monozygotic twins were monochorionic, diamniotic, and born by acute cesarean at 33.5 weeks of gestation due to an abnormal umbilical artery Doppler flow. Both neonates showed dysmorphic DS features, and the diagnosis was confirmed by conventional chromosome analysis showing a male karyotype with trisomy 21 in all analyzed cells. The twins did not present with TAM clinically, but at the age of 11 months, they simultaneously developed AMKL with 35–45% megakaryoblasts in the bone marrow. Both twins were found to have the same somatic GATA1 duplication in exon 2, resulting in an N-terminally truncated protein consistent with the DS–AMKL diagnosis. Chromosome analysis and fluorescent in situ hybridization of cells obtained from bone marrow samples revealed a unique somatic translocation between chromosome 3 and 7: t(3;7)(q27;q32) in both twins (Fig. 1a, b, Supplementary Table S1). Cells with tetrasomy 21 were also found in both twins, whereas the other acquired chromosomal abnormalities were not shared (Supplementary Table S1). The twins were treated according to the international ML-DS protocol 200611, had a parallel treatment response, gained full remission, and are both without disease 3 years after diagnosis.

Fig. 1. A shared somatic translocation in monozygotic twins with Down syndrome and acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (AMKL).

Fig. 1

a Partial karyogram of the somatic translocation showing the normal and the derivative chromosomes 3 and 7 (der(3) and der(7)) with the arrows indicating the approximate breakpoint positions. b The translocation was confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization with whole-chromosome paint using a red chromosome 7 probe, and by c mate-pair sequencing as illustrated with the green line in the circos plot. d The chromosome 7 breakpoint was found to delete/truncate four protein-coding genes as shown in the GRCh37 UCSC Genome Browser view of the deleted region associated with the 7q22.1 breakpoint. e The monozygotic twins are derived from a single fertilized egg with trisomy 21. The GATA1 mutation and the somatic t(3;7)(q25.1;q22.1) translocation must have occurred in one of the twins, and a fraction of this clone was transferred to the other twin in utero. Subsequently several non-shared mutations arose in each twin, leading to synchronous AMKL development in both twins.

We mapped the shared somatic translocation by mate-pair sequencing (after written consent from the parents and as described in Supplementary Methods) with the purpose of identifying genes involved in the chromosomal rearrangement. As seen in Fig. 1c, we confirmed the two-way translocation and found no other structural rearrangements. The chromosome 3 breakpoint narrowed to a genomic region of 10.7 kb (chr3:152053805_152064541, hg19), which truncated intron 2 of the MBNL1 gene (transcript variant 1). The chromosome 7 breakpoint involved a 755-kb deletion (chr7:100895760_101650853, hg19) encompassing four protein-coding genes: IFT22, COL26A1, MYL10, and the two first exons of CUX1 (Fig. 1d). Thus, the karyotype was revised to seq[GRCh37] t(3;7)(q25.1;q22.1) g.[chr3:pter_cen_152053805::chr7:101650853_qter] g.[chr7:pter_cen_100895760::chr3:152064541_qter].

To search for additional mutations potentially involved in the leukemogenesis of these twins, we performed chromosomal microarray, whole-exome sequencing and RNA sequencing on DNA and RNA extracted from the bone marrow at the time of diagnosis, and chromosomal microarray and whole-genome sequencing of germline DNA extracted from peripheral blood after remission (Supplementary Methods). These genome-wide analyses were carried out as part of the STAGING research project approved by the regional ethical committee (H-15016782) and the Danish data protection agency (RH-2016-219, I-Suite no: 04804). No shared pathogenic variants were found besides the t(3;7)(q25.1;q22.1) translocation and the tetrasomy 21 mosaicism (Supplementary Fig. S1 and Tables S1S3), but a constitutional BRCA2 variant of unknown significance was found in both twins (the family pedigree was without breast and ovarian cancer in first to third-degree relatives). However, we found a number of non-shared somatic variants in each twin, e.g., duplication 1q and a JAK3 missense variant in Twin A, and mosaicism for trisomy 8 and a frameshift variant in RAD21 in Twin B (Supplementary Table S1). We screened for fusion transcripts on RNA-sequencing data and found none generated by the t(3;7)(q25.1;q22.1) translocation (see Supplementary Information). Gene expression of leukemic cells revealed a slightly higher expression of JAK3 in Twin A compared with Twin B, whereas no noticeable differences were found for, e.g., RAD21, CUX1, and MBNL1 (Supplementary Table S4).

Several observations support that the acquired t(3;7)(q25.1;q22.1) translocation is an important leukemogenic step; (1) since both the unique translocation and the specific GATA1 mutation are shared, they both must have arisen in one twin and thereafter been transferred to the other twin in utero; (2) no other pathogenic variants were shared in these twins who developed AMKL at the same time, had parallel disease progression, and the same treatment response; (3) chromosome 7 and 7q abnormalities are recurrent somatic aberrations, e.g., found in ~6% of patients with DS–AMKL4. We therefore mapped the chromosomal breakpoints to search for 7q genes driving this synchronous AMKL progression in the twins. Indeed, one of the four truncated/deleted genes on chromosome 7q was the transcription factor, CUX1: a tumor-suppressor gene in which inactivating monoallelic mutations have been found to promote tumorigenesis in myeloid malignancies12,13. The other three deleted/truncated genes on chromosome 7 are without a known role in leukemia. The truncated gene on chromosome 3, MBNL1, is a splicing regulator, and has been found in one study to be deleted in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia, often in combination with a ZEB2 deletion14, and the loss-of-function mutation of MBNL1 could therefore also be involved in DS–AMKL development. An extra supernumerary chromosome 21 was found in all cells containing the translocation in both twins, indicating that gain of chromosome 21 may be an early contributing factor too. Trisomy 8, 1q duplication, and pathogenic variants in JAK3 and RAD21 have previously been reported in DS–AMKL46,15, but since they were only found in one twin each, these variants must have occurred later in the leukemic development than the t(3;7)(q25.1;q22.1) translocation (as illustrated in Fig. 1e).

This is the first report of a somatic translocation involving CUX1 in patients with DS–AMKL. Based on the shared occurrence in the twins combined with studies showing chromosome 7q involvement in DS–AMKL4 and the role of CUX1 in myeloid malignancies12,13, we propose that an acquired loss-of-function mutation in CUX1 can be a critical early, and even prenatal, somatic event that drives a GATA1-mutated clone into AMKL in patients with Down syndrome.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (29.6KB, docx)
Fig S1 (730.8KB, pdf)
Table S1 (16.9KB, xlsx)
Table S2 (18.3KB, xlsx)
Table S3 (10.2KB, xlsx)
Table S4 (9.7KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

We thank the family for participating in this study, and Mads Bak for performing the bioinformatic pipeline for analyzing the mate-pair results. This work was supported by research funding from the Danish Council for Independent Research, the NEYE Foundation, director Michael Hermann Nielsen’s memorial grant B, Engineer Otto Christensen Foundation, Aase and Ejnar Danielsens Foundation, the Capital Region of Denmark’s Foundation for Health Research, and the Danish Childhood Cancer Foundation.

Author contributions

I.B., B.L., and M.K.A. formulated the ideas and planned the project. B.L. was responsible for the clinical contact to the family, and A.B. contributed with sample collection and clinical annotation. The genetic analyses were performed by M.K.A. (chromosome analysis and FISH); P.V. and M.M. (GATA1 sequencing); I.B., M.M.M., and N.T. (mate-pair sequencing); I.B. and O.Ø. (chromosomal microarray); K.W., A.B., and M.R. (whole-genome, whole-exome, and RNA sequencing). K.S. is the principal investigator of STAGING and was involved in the interpretation of the results. I.B. and M.K.A. wrote the paper with contributions from all authors. All the authors reviewed and accepted the paper.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at (10.1038/s41408-020-0293-6).

References

  • 1.Hasle H, Clemmensen IH, Mikkelsen M. Risks of leukaemia and solid tumours in individuals with Down’s syndrome. Lancet. 2000;355:165–169. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)05264-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wechsler J, et al. Acquired mutations in GATA1 in the megakaryoblastic leukemia of Down syndrome. Nat. Genet. 2002;32:148–152. doi: 10.1038/ng955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Roberts I, et al. GATA1-mutant clones are frequent and often unsuspected in babies with Down syndrome: identification of a population at risk of leukemia. Blood. 2013;122:3908–3917. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-07-515148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Blink M, et al. Normal karyotype is a poor prognostic factor in myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome: a retrospective, international study. Haematologica. 2014;99:299–307. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.089425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Forestier E, et al. Cytogenetic features of acute lymphoblastic and myeloid leukemias in pediatric patients with Down syndrome: an iBFM-SG study. Blood. 2008;111:1575–1583. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-09-114231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yoshida K, et al. The landscape of somatic mutations in Down syndrome-related myeloid disorders. Nat. Genet. 2013;45:1293–1301. doi: 10.1038/ng.2759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nikolaev SI, et al. Exome sequencing identifies putative drivers of progression of transient myeloproliferative disorder to AMKL in infants with Down syndrome. Blood. 2013;122:554–561. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-03-491936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ma Y, et al. Developmental timing of mutations revealed by whole-genome sequencing of twins with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2013;110:7429–7433. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221099110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Valdés-Mas R, et al. Transplacental transfer of essential thrombocythemia in monozygotic twins. Blood. 2016;128:1894–1896. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-06-724252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shimada A, et al. Fetal origin of the GATA1 mutation in identical twins with transient myeloproliferative disorder and acute megakaryoblastic leukemia accompanying Down syndrome. Blood. 2004;103:366. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-09-3219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Uffmann M, et al. Therapy reduction in patients with Down syndrome and myeloid leukemia: the international ML-DS 2006 trial. Blood. 2017;129:3314–3321. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-01-765057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.McNerney ME, et al. CUX1 is a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 7 frequently inactivated in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2013;121:975–983. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-04-426965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wong CC, et al. Inactivating CUX1 mutations promote tumorigenesis. Nat. Genet. 2014;46:33–38. doi: 10.1038/ng.2846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bolouri H, et al. The molecular landscape of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia reveals recurrent structural alterations and age-specific mutational interactions. Nat. Med. 2018;24:103–112. doi: 10.1038/nm.4439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Labuhn M, et al. Mechanisms of progression of myeloid preleukemia to transformed myeloid leukemia in children with Down syndrome. Cancer Cell. 2019;36:123–138. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (29.6KB, docx)
Fig S1 (730.8KB, pdf)
Table S1 (16.9KB, xlsx)
Table S2 (18.3KB, xlsx)
Table S3 (10.2KB, xlsx)
Table S4 (9.7KB, xlsx)

Articles from Blood Cancer Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES