Abstract
The concentration of Al, As, Ba, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, Se and Zn were determined in the milk collected from the locally rearing cows from the vicinity of copper mining areas of East Singhbhum and iron mining areas of West Singhbhum using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry for a risk assessment and source apportionment study. Principal component analysis suggested both natural and anthropogenic activities as causative sources of metals in the milk. The hazard indices ranged from 0.26 to 0.89 with a mean of 0.56 in the iron mining areas and 0.29–1.89 with a mean of 1.17 in the copper mining areas due to ingestion of milk, which indicated that the risk is negligible in the iron mining areas while there is an appreciable risk to the health of consumers of milk in the copper mining areas.
Keywords: Milk, Metals, Principal component analysis, Risk assessment, Mining areas
Introduction
Amidst the rapid developmental activities, one of the most serious problems that have emerged for the human society is the metal contamination of the environment. One of the sources of metals in the environment can be attributed to the metal mining and processing industries (Navarro et al. 2008). The metals in the environmental components like soil and water can easily be transferred to the plants, livestock and ultimately human beings through the food chains causing serious human health issues. Not only the plants, but food products of animal origin also depict high levels of metals due to bioaccumulation (Licata et al. 2012). Grazing of the livestock on the contaminated soil and feeding them with contaminated feed and water are the probable sources of metals accumulation in the meat and milk.
Milk is regarded as a nearly complete food for its being a good source of proteins, fats, minerals and vitamins and thus consumed widely by all age group of people worldwide (Malhat et al. 2012). Milk is also an ideal source of macroelements like P, K, Ca and microelements like Fe, Zn, Se, Cu, etc. However, the contamination of milk with toxic metals at very low levels as well as concentration of essential metals at high levels beyond limits both can cause toxicity to the consumers (Li et al. 2005).
Singhbhum craton and shear zones of Eastern India harbors one of the largest deposits of iron and copper, respectively. The regions are under the extensive influence of metal mining and processing industries thus paving the way for metal contamination of the environment and subsequently the food chains. Considering these facts, the present study was undertaken to examine the metal concentrations in the milk of the locally rearing cows. Statistical source apportionment of the metals and human health risk assessment due to consumption of the milk is also addressed in the study.
Materials and methods
Milk samples from locally rearing cows were collected from twelve locations each from the vicinity of copper mining areas from East Singhbhum and iron mining areas from West Singhbhum. The milk samples were procured from the owners of the cows who consented for the use of the milk samples for the study. Sampling was carried out in the month of June 2016 in triplicates. Preservation of the milk samples was carried out using 37% formaldehyde (3 mL per liter of milk) immediately after collection (Douglas 1967). The samples were acid digested using mixture of nitric acid and perchloric acid on hotplate (Richards 1968) and aliquots were preserved for the metal analysis. Concentrations of the metals (Al, As, Ba, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, Se and Zn) were estimated in the milk samples using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, Perkin Elmer Elan DRC-e).
The method of analysis was validated using the standard addition method and thus calculating the recoveries. The recoveries varied from 95.8 to 100% for the studied metals. Calibration standards were regularly analysed to ensure the stability of the instrument.
Principal component analysis (PCA) is a statistical method applied to reduce the number of measured variables into a smaller number of artificial variables that are named principal components (PC). The number of extracted PC that are taken into consideration are the ones which have eigenvalues > 1 and they justify the maximum variance in the dataset (Kolsi et al. 2013). A weight factor is associated with each variable considered for PCA which is referred to PC score. It is the correlation between the original variable and the factor. A PC score close to ± 1 indicates a strong positive or negative correlation between the given variable and the factor.
Estimated daily intake (EDI) was calculated taking the geometric mean concentration of the metals in milk (mg L1) and per day consumption of 144 mL of milk for Indian population (NSSO 2014). The estimated daily intake (EDI) of metals was calculated with Eq. (1) (Song et al. 2009)
| 1 |
where EDI is the estimated daily intake of metal through milk for an adult (in mg kg−1 d−1), Cmetal is the estimated concentration of metal in milk (in mg L−1), Wmilk stands for the daily consumption of milk (in L d−1), and Bw is the body weight of an Indian adult (in kg) which is used as 52 kg for the study (Dang et al. 1996).
Target hazard quotient (THQ) as proposed by the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA 1989) is the ratio of the estimated daily intake (EDI; mg kg−1 d−1) of a metal to the oral reference dose of that metal (RfD, mg kg−1 d−1). It can also be defined as the maximum tolerable daily intake of a specific metal that does not result in any adverse health effects (Eq. 2):
| 2 |
If the value of THQ is greater than unity, there is a probability of harmful health effects for the exposed population. Considering the risk assessment of multiple metals in milk, hazard index (HI) was used which is the sum of all the calculated THQ values of studied metals (Eq. 3). HI > 1 suggests a potential for detrimental effect on human health and advocates further detailed study (USEPA 1989). This approach is based on EPA’s Guidelines for Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures.
| 3 |
where THQi is the target hazard quotient of an individual metal. HI is the total hazard index for all the metals studied in the present study and n is 12.
Results and discussion
Distribution of metals in milk
Large variations were observed in the metal concentrations of milk collected from both the study areas (Table 1). The concentrations provided are the mean of the triplicate samples collected from each location. The geometric concentration (in mg L−1) of Al, As, Ba, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, Se and Zn in copper mining areas of East Singhbhum and iron mining areas of West Singhbhum was 0.507, 0.015, 0.340, 0.033, 0.153, 0.509, 8.843, 0.280, 0.624, 0.129, 0.084, 1.224 and 0.268, 0.010, 0.339, 0.008, 0.058, 0.312, 11.404, 0.549, 0.201, 0.089, 0.036, 1.035, respectively.
Table 1.
Mean metal concentrations (mg L−1) in Cow’s milk collected from East Singhbhum (copper) and West Singhbhum (iron) mining areas, India (each value is average of 3 samples)
| S.No. | Location | Al | As | Ba | Co | Cr | Cu | Fe | Mn | Ni | Pb | Se | Zn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| East Singhbhum | |||||||||||||
| 1 | Kuldiha | 0.147 | 0.003 | 0.021 | 0.012 | 0.099 | 0.186 | 2.799 | 0.019 | 0.117 | 0.008 | 0.013 | 0.370 |
| 2 | Kutludih | 1.305 | 0.033 | 0.584 | 0.036 | 0.162 | 1.976 | 27.830 | 1.585 | 0.840 | 0.503 | 0.116 | 1.898 |
| 3 | Pathergora | 0.890 | 0.027 | 0.415 | 0.028 | 0.147 | 0.300 | 7.271 | 0.457 | 0.797 | 0.161 | 0.088 | 1.152 |
| 4 | Rakha | 0.338 | 0.011 | 0.399 | 0.023 | 0.143 | 0.231 | 5.743 | 0.064 | 0.762 | 0.039 | 0.089 | 1.240 |
| 5 | Sohada | 0.379 | 0.006 | 0.443 | 0.048 | 0.161 | 0.178 | 7.252 | 0.332 | 0.725 | 0.724 | 0.119 | 2.013 |
| 6 | Badia | 0.561 | 0.007 | 0.555 | 0.073 | 0.195 | 2.319 | 19.589 | 1.580 | 0.978 | 0.011 | 0.102 | 0.901 |
| 7 | Ghatsila | 0.313 | 0.010 | 0.441 | 0.039 | 0.196 | 0.270 | 10.580 | 0.096 | 0.568 | 0.204 | 0.135 | 1.779 |
| 8 | Mahulia | 1.106 | 0.022 | 0.495 | 0.033 | 0.111 | 0.289 | 4.363 | 0.679 | 0.728 | 0.454 | 0.065 | 0.957 |
| 9 | Bhatin | 0.271 | 0.031 | 0.368 | 0.017 | 0.160 | 0.219 | 4.549 | 0.054 | 0.665 | 0.072 | 0.058 | 1.695 |
| 10 | Mosabani | 0.652 | 0.023 | 0.215 | 0.090 | 0.125 | 3.250 | 6.980 | 0.256 | 1.750 | 0.210 | 0.080 | 1.258 |
| 11 | Terenga | 0.253 | 0.016 | 0.658 | 0.040 | 0.205 | 0.830 | 11.210 | 0.315 | 0.250 | 0.850 | 0.110 | 3.125 |
| 12 | Kalikapur | 1.526 | 0.042 | 0.412 | 0.020 | 0.169 | 0.620 | 30.120 | 1.789 | 0.690 | 0.090 | 0.180 | 0.548 |
| Geomean | 0.507 | 0.015 | 0.340 | 0.033 | 0.153 | 0.509 | 8.843 | 0.280 | 0.624 | 0.129 | 0.084 | 1.224 | |
| West Singhbhum | |||||||||||||
| 1 | Karampada | 0.430 | 0.003 | 0.425 | 0.009 | 0.127 | 0.216 | 37.025 | 1.162 | 0.252 | 0.058 | 0.041 | 0.873 |
| 2 | Chota nagra | 0.474 | 0.038 | 0.503 | 0.017 | 0.019 | 0.436 | 5.874 | 0.352 | 0.324 | 0.003 | 0.062 | 0.498 |
| 3 | Bahda | 0.219 | 0.001 | 0.327 | 0.003 | 0.005 | 0.292 | 2.100 | 0.162 | 0.120 | 0.168 | 0.024 | 1.506 |
| 4 | Sedal | 0.258 | 0.009 | 0.254 | 0.009 | 0.121 | 0.214 | 21.360 | 0.914 | 0.214 | 0.536 | 0.029 | 2.698 |
| 5 | Gua | 0.314 | 0.012 | 0.334 | 0.007 | 0.138 | 0.313 | 25.024 | 1.025 | 0.193 | 0.025 | 0.047 | 0.547 |
| 6 | Noamundi | 0.387 | 0.024 | 0.496 | 0.014 | 0.111 | 0.411 | 19.240 | 0.845 | 0.291 | 0.036 | 0.059 | 0.698 |
| 7 | Tentarighat | 0.125 | 0.019 | 0.217 | 0.013 | 0.058 | 0.245 | 10.250 | 0.238 | 0.246 | 0.057 | 0.031 | 1.147 |
| 8 | Bokna | 0.224 | 0.006 | 0.229 | 0.003 | 0.089 | 0.309 | 12.780 | 0.359 | 0.156 | 0.254 | 0.022 | 1.028 |
| 9 | Banker | 0.308 | 0.021 | 0.347 | 0.005 | 0.119 | 0.358 | 9.690 | 0.783 | 0.183 | 0.318 | 0.041 | 2.147 |
| 10 | Dangoaposi | 0.169 | 0.007 | 0.411 | 0.011 | 0.093 | 0.396 | 13.560 | 0.665 | 0.149 | 0.211 | 0.036 | 0.893 |
| 11 | Bichaikiri | 0.254 | 0.009 | 0.314 | 0.009 | 0.086 | 0.299 | 9.142 | 0.515 | 0.214 | 0.254 | 0.029 | 0.968 |
| 12 | Kotgarh | 0.269 | 0.014 | 0.354 | 0.007 | 0.015 | 0.345 | 6.548 | 0.625 | 0.168 | 0.069 | 0.034 | 1.025 |
| Geomean | 0.268 | 0.010 | 0.339 | 0.008 | 0.058 | 0.312 | 11.404 | 0.549 | 0.201 | 0.089 | 0.036 | 1.035 | |
Compared to the Indian standards for food, none of the metals from both the study areas exceeded the limits. While comparing both the study areas, it can be observed that most of the metals have higher concentrations in the milk samples collected from the copper mining areas as compared to the iron mining areas except for Fe and Mn which were found to be higher in the samples collected from iron mining areas.
Principal component analysis
Inter-elemental relationships can be studied by correlation analysis and significant positive correlations indicate coexistence in the environment. However, advanced multivariate statistical tools like principal component analysis (PCA) provide a better picture regarding the source apportionment of the metals (Chabukdhara and Nema 2012). PCA was applied on the elemental data of milk samples from both the study areas to assist the interpretation of the data.
For the data of copper mining area, four principal components (Table 2) with eigenvalue greater than unity collectively explicated for 87.9% of the total variance. Metals such as Al, As, Ba, Cr, Fe, Mn and Se showed high loadings for first and second components (PC1 and PC2) accounted for 46.7% of variance and can be related to the geological formations of the study area. The third factor (PC3) expounds 21.8% of total variance, with Cu, Ni and Co contributing highly to this component. This factor can be attributed to the copper mining and processing activities of the area (Ikenaka et al. 2010; Giri and Singh 2015). The fourth component (PC4) explained 19.5% of variance, with Ba, Pb and Zn being the major contributors. This component seemed to be associated with anthropogenic sources, like fossil fuel combustion, industrial activities (electroplating, manufacturing of alloys, etc.) and vehicular sources (brake linings, catalytic converters, tires, fuel additives) (Giri and Singh 2015; Kennedy and Gadd 2000).
Table 2.
Principal component loadings (varimax normalized) for the metals in the copper mining areas of East Singhbhum, India
| Elements | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al | 0.206 | 0.944 | 0.111 | − 0.089 |
| As | 0.067 | 0.882 | − 0.006 | 0.052 |
| Ba | 0.619 | 0.188 | 0.016 | 0.628 |
| Co | 0.129 | − 0.183 | 0.947 | 0.131 |
| Cr | 0.865 | − 0.206 | 0.009 | 0.366 |
| Cu | 0.145 | 0.124 | 0.923 | − 0.049 |
| Fe | 0.761 | 0.565 | 0.118 | − 0.091 |
| Mn | 0.634 | 0.630 | 0.198 | − 0.186 |
| Ni | − 0.110 | 0.240 | 0.893 | − 0.083 |
| Pb | 0.037 | 0.054 | − 0.010 | 0.921 |
| Se | 0.776 | 0.346 | 0.049 | 0.196 |
| Zn | 0.199 | − 0.234 | − 0.003 | 0.916 |
| Eigenvalues | 4.348 | 2.868 | 2.309 | 1.019 |
| % Total variance | 23.8 | 22.8 | 21.8 | 19.5 |
| Cumulative variance | 23.8 | 46.6 | 68.4 | 87.9 |
For the concentrations of metals in the milk samples from the iron mining areas, three principal components (Table 3) with eigenvalue greater than 1 were extracted which together elucidated 81.2% of the total variance. The first component has high loadings for Al, As, Ba, Co, Cu, Ni and Se and can be related to the natural sources. It explained 36.3% of the total variance. The second component (PC2) illustrates 25.3% of total variance and is emphasized by major factor loading for Cr, Fe and Mn. This factor can be linked to the iron mining activities of the study area. The third component (PC3) was associated with Pb and Zn and may be ascribed to the vehicular activities of the area.
Table 3.
Principal component loadings (varimax normalized) for the metals in the iron mining areas of West Singhbhum, India
| Elements | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al | 0.677 | 0.389 | − 0.292 |
| As | 0.905 | − 0.286 | − 0.029 |
| Ba | 0.683 | 0.139 | − 0.505 |
| Co | 0.813 | − 0.031 | − 0.152 |
| Cr | 0.005 | 0.860 | 0.223 |
| Cu | 0.566 | − 0.391 | − 0.362 |
| Fe | 0.001 | 0.967 | − 0.111 |
| Mn | 0.141 | 0.932 | 0.009 |
| Ni | 0.858 | 0.192 | − 0.104 |
| Pb | − 0.270 | 0.089 | 0.890 |
| Se | 0.878 | 0.203 | − 0.369 |
| Zn | − 0.190 | 0.049 | 0.924 |
| Eigenvalues | 5.371 | 3.048 | 1.329 |
| % Total variance | 36.3 | 25.3 | 19.6 |
| Cumulative variance | 36.3 | 61.6 | 81.2 |
Risk assessment of heavy metals due to consumption of milk
To evaluate the risk associated with the human health due to the consumption of milk in the mining areas, Estimated daily intake (EDI), target hazard quotients (THQ) and hazard index (HI) were calculated with a supposition that the local population consumes only the milk from the locally reared cows. The EDI values of metals for an adult through the consumption of milk for both the study areas are shown in Table 4.
Table 4.
Estimated dietary intakes (EDI) of metals by consuming milk collected from East Singhbhum (copper) and West Singhbhum (iron) mining areas, India
| Elements | East Singhbhum | West Singhbhum | PTDIa |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al | 1.757 | 0.792 | 285 |
| As | 0.052 | 0.038 | 2.14 |
| Ba | 1.139 | 0.972 | 20 |
| Co | 0.104 | 0.025 | 500 |
| Cr | 0.432 | 0.226 | 3 |
| Cu | 2.381 | 0.885 | 500 |
| Fe | 31.34 | 39.83 | 800 |
| Mn | 1.599 | 1.764 | 140 |
| Ni | 2.022 | 0.579 | 5 |
| Pb | 0.736 | 0.459 | 3.57 |
| Se | 0.264 | 0.105 | 5 |
| Zn | 3.868 | 3.237 | 1000 |
EDI values, in mg kg body wt−1 d−1
aPTDI values (in mg kg body wt−1 d−1) of all the metals were based on the data suggested by The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA 2003). The PTDI values of Cr is based on the reference doses (RfD) of Cr(VI) established by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2011)
The values are lower than the provisional tolerable daily intake (PTDI) values as given by FAO/WHO (JECFA 2003) and thus it can be suggested that considering the PTDI, the consumption of milk in both the study areas does not pose health risk for consumers. The THQ values for the metals considering the consumption of milk by an adult are depicted in Table 5. It can be seen from the table that the highest HQ values are obtained for Co followed by Pb in case of the copper mining areas of East Singhbhum. For the iron mining areas of West Singhbhum, the highest HQ values were calculated for the Pb followed by As. However, for none of the metals, the HQ was greater than unity for both the locations and thus can be said that the metals do not pose risk individually to the consumers of the milk.
Table 5.
Target hazard quotients (THQ) of metals by consuming milk collected from East Singhbhum (copper) and West Singhbhum (iron) mining areas, India
| S.No. | Location | Al | As | Ba | Co | Cr | Cu | Fe | Mn | Ni | Pb | Se | Zn | HI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| East Singhbhum | ||||||||||||||
| 1 | Kuldiha | 0.0004 | 0.0259 | 0.0003 | 0.1108 | 0.0914 | 0.0129 | 0.0111 | 0.0004 | 0.0162 | 0.0066 | 0.0073 | 0.0034 | 0.287 |
| 2 | Kutludih | 0.0036 | 0.3007 | 0.0081 | 0.3295 | 0.1497 | 0.1368 | 0.1101 | 0.0313 | 0.1163 | 0.3981 | 0.0641 | 0.0175 | 1.666 |
| 3 | Pathergora | 0.0025 | 0.2521 | 0.0057 | 0.2538 | 0.1359 | 0.0208 | 0.0288 | 0.0090 | 0.1104 | 0.1275 | 0.0488 | 0.0106 | 1.006 |
| 4 | Rakha | 0.0009 | 0.1031 | 0.0055 | 0.2086 | 0.1320 | 0.0160 | 0.0227 | 0.0013 | 0.1055 | 0.0306 | 0.0491 | 0.0114 | 0.687 |
| 5 | Sohada | 0.0010 | 0.0511 | 0.0061 | 0.4394 | 0.1483 | 0.0123 | 0.0287 | 0.0066 | 0.1004 | 0.5730 | 0.0658 | 0.0186 | 1.451 |
| 6 | Badia | 0.0016 | 0.0632 | 0.0077 | 0.6720 | 0.1799 | 0.1606 | 0.0775 | 0.0313 | 0.1354 | 0.0085 | 0.0564 | 0.0083 | 1.402 |
| 7 | Ghatsila | 0.0009 | 0.0950 | 0.0061 | 0.3609 | 0.1813 | 0.0187 | 0.0419 | 0.0019 | 0.0786 | 0.1612 | 0.0747 | 0.0164 | 1.038 |
| 8 | Mahulia | 0.0031 | 0.2015 | 0.0069 | 0.3046 | 0.1022 | 0.0200 | 0.0173 | 0.0134 | 0.1007 | 0.3593 | 0.0362 | 0.0088 | 1.174 |
| 9 | Bhatin | 0.0007 | 0.2846 | 0.0051 | 0.1560 | 0.1478 | 0.0152 | 0.0180 | 0.0011 | 0.0920 | 0.0567 | 0.0319 | 0.0156 | 0.825 |
| 10 | Mosabani | 0.0018 | 0.2123 | 0.0030 | 0.8308 | 0.1154 | 0.2250 | 0.0276 | 0.0051 | 0.2423 | 0.1662 | 0.0443 | 0.0116 | 1.885 |
| 11 | Terenga | 0.0007 | 0.1477 | 0.0091 | 0.3692 | 0.1892 | 0.0575 | 0.0443 | 0.0062 | 0.0346 | 0.6725 | 0.0609 | 0.0288 | 1.621 |
| 12 | Kalikapur | 0.0042 | 0.3877 | 0.0057 | 0.1846 | 0.1560 | 0.0429 | 0.1192 | 0.0354 | 0.0955 | 0.0712 | 0.0997 | 0.0051 | 1.207 |
| West Singhbhum | ||||||||||||||
| 1 | Karampada | 0.0012 | 0.0266 | 0.0059 | 0.0785 | 0.1172 | 0.0150 | 0.1465 | 0.0230 | 0.0349 | 0.0459 | 0.0225 | 0.0081 | 0.525 |
| 2 | Chota nagra | 0.0013 | 0.3505 | 0.0070 | 0.1569 | 0.0171 | 0.0302 | 0.0232 | 0.0070 | 0.0449 | 0.0025 | 0.0345 | 0.0046 | 0.680 |
| 3 | Bahda | 0.0006 | 0.0116 | 0.0045 | 0.0305 | 0.0042 | 0.0202 | 0.0083 | 0.0032 | 0.0166 | 0.1326 | 0.0131 | 0.0139 | 0.259 |
| 4 | Sedal | 0.0007 | 0.0831 | 0.0035 | 0.0831 | 0.1117 | 0.0148 | 0.0845 | 0.0181 | 0.0296 | 0.4241 | 0.0161 | 0.0249 | 0.894 |
| 5 | Gua | 0.0009 | 0.1108 | 0.0046 | 0.0646 | 0.1274 | 0.0217 | 0.0990 | 0.0203 | 0.0267 | 0.0198 | 0.0260 | 0.0050 | 0.527 |
| 6 | Noamundi | 0.0011 | 0.2215 | 0.0069 | 0.1292 | 0.1025 | 0.0285 | 0.0761 | 0.0167 | 0.0403 | 0.0285 | 0.0327 | 0.0064 | 0.690 |
| 7 | Tentarighat | 0.0003 | 0.1754 | 0.0030 | 0.1200 | 0.0535 | 0.0170 | 0.0405 | 0.0047 | 0.0341 | 0.0451 | 0.0172 | 0.0106 | 0.521 |
| 8 | Bokna | 0.0006 | 0.0554 | 0.0032 | 0.0277 | 0.0822 | 0.0214 | 0.0506 | 0.0071 | 0.0216 | 0.2010 | 0.0122 | 0.0095 | 0.492 |
| 9 | Banker | 0.0009 | 0.1938 | 0.0048 | 0.0462 | 0.1098 | 0.0248 | 0.0383 | 0.0155 | 0.0253 | 0.2516 | 0.0227 | 0.0198 | 0.754 |
| 10 | Dangoaposi | 0.0005 | 0.0646 | 0.0057 | 0.1015 | 0.0858 | 0.0274 | 0.0536 | 0.0132 | 0.0206 | 0.1669 | 0.0199 | 0.0082 | 0.568 |
| 11 | Bichaikiri | 0.0007 | 0.0831 | 0.0043 | 0.0831 | 0.0794 | 0.0207 | 0.0362 | 0.0102 | 0.0296 | 0.2010 | 0.0161 | 0.0089 | 0.573 |
| 12 | Kotgarh | 0.0007 | 0.1292 | 0.0049 | 0.0646 | 0.0136 | 0.0239 | 0.0259 | 0.0124 | 0.0233 | 0.0546 | 0.0188 | 0.0095 | 0.381 |
Nevertheless, considering the combined effect of the metals, the HI values for the various locations of the copper mining areas ranged from 0.29 to 1.89 with an average of 1.17 which is greater than 1.0 thus indicating risk to human health by dietary intake of metals through milk. Co, Pb and As are the highest contributors towards the non-carcinogenic risk for the area. The highest HI (1.89) was calculated for the location of Mosabani which is under the influence of copper mining and processing facilities. The next highest HI was estimated for Kutludih (1.67) which is in close proximity of the copper processing industry of Maubhandar. Thus, it can be noted that higher risk were estimated for the locations which are in close vicinity to the mining and processing industries. The detrimental effects of the chronic exposure to the metals through contaminated food become noticeable after a lapse of a considerable time period. The effects may include gastrointestinal problems, nervous disorders, cardiovascular problems, kidney and bone diseases.
For the other study area i.e. iron mining areas the human health risk due to consumption of locally rearing cow’s milk is considerably lower as compared to the copper mining areas even after considering the cumulative effect of the metals. The HI values in the iron mining areas ranged from 0.26 to 0.89 with an average of 0.56 thus indicating negligible risk to the local population.
Conclusion
The results of the investigation suggest that some of the milk samples collected from the mining areas particularly copper mining areas might be unfit for human consumption. Principal component analysis for both the mining areas explained 87.9% and 81.2% of the variance, respectively, indicating both innate and anthropogenic activities as causative sources of metals in the milk of locally rearing cows. The mean hazard index value was calculated to be 0.56 and 1.17 for the iron and copper mining areas, respectively, indicating negligible risk for the iron mining areas and considerable risk for the milk consumers from the copper mining areas. Thus, the study points towards potential contamination of the food chain with metals due to industrialization, urbanization and mining in some of the locations, particularly for the copper mining areas.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, for providing the necessary funding for the study under the DST-Young Scientist Scheme (Grant No. YSS/2015/001211). Also authors are thankful to the Director and Water Resource Management Section (NREM), CSIR-Central Institute of Mining and Fuel Research, Dhanbad for providing the necessary laboratory facilities and other logistic support for the study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- Chabukdhara M, Nema AK. Assessment of heavy metal contamination in Hindon River sediments: a chemometric and geochemical approach. Chemosphere. 2012;87:945–953. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.01.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dang HS, Jaiswal DD, Parameswaran M, Deodhar KP, Krishnamony S. Age dependent physical and anatomical Indian data for application in internal dosimetry. Radiat Prot Dosim. 1996;63:217–222. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a031532. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Douglas S (1967) Radiation assay procedures for environmental samples. Section 3–3 National Center for Radiological Health, Rockville, Maryland, Geneva
- Giri S, Singh AK. Human health risk assessment via drinking water pathway due to metal contamination in the groundwater of Subarnarekha River Basin, India. Environ Monit Assess. 2015;187:63. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4265-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ikenaka Y, Shouta M, Nakayama M, et al. Heavy metal contamination of soil and sediment in Zambia. Afr J Environ Sci Technol. 2010;4:729–739. [Google Scholar]
- Joint FAO/WHO expert committee on food additives (JECFA) (2003) Summary and conclusions of the 61st Meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO expert committee on food additives (JECFA). JECFA/61/SC; Rome, Italy
- Kennedy P, Gadd J (2000) Preliminary examination of inorganic compounds present in tyres, brake pads and road bitumen in New Zealand. Prepared by Kingett Mitchell Ltd for Ministry of Transport, November 2000. Revised Oct 2003
- Kolsi SH, Bouri S, Hachicha W, Dhia HB. Implementation and evaluation of multivariate analysis for groundwater hydrochemistry assessment in arid environments: a case study of Hajeb Elyoun-Jelma, Central Tunisia. Environ Earth Sci. 2013;70:2215–2224. doi: 10.1007/s12665-013-2377-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li Y, McCrory DF, Powel JM, Saam H, Jackson-Smith D. A survey of selected heavy metal concentrations in Wisconsin Dairy Feeds. J Dairy Sci. 2005;88:2911–2922. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72972-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Licata P, Di Bella G, Potorti AG, Lo Turco V, Salvo A, Dugo G, et al. Determination of trace elements in goat and ovine milk from Calabria (Italy) by ICP-AES. Food Addit Contam Part B. 2012;5(4):268–271. doi: 10.1080/19393210.2012.705335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malhat F, Hagag M, Saber A, Fayz AE. Contamination of cows milk by heavy metal in Egypt. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2012;88:611–613. doi: 10.1007/s00128-012-0550-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) (2014) Household consumption of various goods and services in India 2011–2012, NSS 68th Round, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India
- Navarro MC, Perez-Sirvent C, Martinez-Sanchez MJ, Vidal J, Tovar PJ, Bech J. Abandoned mine sites as a source of contamination by heavymetals: a case study in a semi-arid zone. J Geochem Explor. 2008;96:183–193. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2007.04.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Richards LA. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkaline soils. Agricultural handbook No. 60. 1. New Delhi: IBH Publications Company; 1968. [Google Scholar]
- Song B, Lei M, Chen T, Zheng YM, Xie YF, Li XY, Gao D. Assessing the health risk of heavy metals in vegetables to the general population in Beijing, China. J Environ Sci (China) 2009;21:1702–1709. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62476-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Health effect assessments summary tables (HEAST) and user’s guide. Washington, DC: Office of Emergency and Remedial Response; 1989. [Google Scholar]
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Risk-based concentration table. Washington, DC: USEPA; 2011. [Google Scholar]
