Abstract
A series of soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) inhibitors containing 2-fluorophenyl fragment was developed. Inhibition potency of the described compounds ranges from 0.7 to 630.9 nM. 1-(Adamantan-1-ylmethyl)-3-(2-fluorophenyl) urea (3b, IC50 = 0.7 nM) and 1-(adamantan-2-yl)-3-(2-fluorophenyl) urea (3i, IC50 =1.0 nM) were found to be the most potent sEH inhibitors within the described series. Crystal results suggest that potency is probably enhanced by extra hydrogen bond between the fluorine atom and catalytic tyrosine residues.
Keywords: fluoroaromatics, soluble epoxide hydrolase, inhibitor, adamantane, urea
Graphical Abstract
1. Introduction
The mammalian soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) is an enzyme involved in the metabolism of epoxides of arachidonic acid and other natural epoxy-fatty acids,1 which have numerous biological activities.2 Through the addition of a water molecule, sEH converts epoxides into corresponding vicinal diols thus affecting inflammatory processes, pain and other disease states.2 Thereby inhibition of sEH could be beneficial in treatment of many renal and cardiovascular diseases.3,4 Although thousands of various sEH inhibitors were synthesized over the last few decades5-7, they have limited bioavailability, especially toward the CNS where sEH is emerging as a potential target for neurological diseases.8 Inhibitors of sEH containing fluorine atoms are among the most promising to go through the blood-brain-barrier.9 Another structure fragment which is widely used in the design of sEH inhibitors is adamantane.10,11 Herein, we decided to combine both adamantyl and fluoroaromatic fragments in a single molecule and test them as soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitors, with physical properties that could allow to target sEH in the CNS.
2. Results and discussion
As a starting material we used 2-fluorophenyl isocyanate (1, Scheme 1) and various adamantyl amines 2a-j. Starting amines 1a-h have 1 to 3 methyl substituents in the bridgehead positions of adamantane or hydrocarbon spacers between adamantane and the amino group. In addition, the reactive amino groups of amines 2i and 2j are at the bridge position of adamantane.
Scheme 1.
Reagents and conditions: a. DMF, Et3N (2 equiv.), 8 h., rt
Structures of the obtained chemicals were assessed by NMR, while purity was assessed by GC-MS, LC-MS and elemental analysis (see Supplemental materials for details). 19F NMR spectra (δ −131.60±0.03, see experimental for details) show that structural changes in the adamantyl part of urea has no detectable effect on the electron structure of the fluorine substituted aromatic ring. Physical and chemical properties of the synthesized compounds (Table 1) show that introduction of hydrocarbon spacers between the adamantane fragment and the urea group leads to a decrease in melting points. Methyl substituents in bridgehead positions of adamantane also decrease melting points except of compound 3h with methyl in each (3, 5 and 7) vacant bridgehead positions.
Table 1.
Properties of compounds 3a-j
![]() |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | R1 | R2 | R3 | X | LogP calca | LogP expb | mp °C) | Solubility (μM)c |
3a | H | H | H | - | 4.49 | - | 199-200 | 70-80 |
3b | H | H | H | CH2 | 4.50 | 4.40 | 191-192 | 60-70 |
3c | H | H | H | CH(CH3) | 4.83 | 4.75 | 172-173 | 50-60 |
3d | H | H | H | CH2CH(Et) | 5.63 | 5.80 | 154-155 | 50-60 |
3e | H | H | H | Ph | 6.17 | - | 183-184 | 80-90 |
3f | Me | H | H | - | 4.55 | - | 149-150 | 50-60 |
3g | Me | Me | H | - | 4.61 | - | 181-182 | 60-70 |
3h | Me | Me | Me | - | 4.67 | - | 212-213 | 70-80 |
3i | ![]() |
4.33 | 4.20 | 196-197 | 80-90 | |||
3j | ![]() |
6.62 | 6.55 | 137-138 | 70-80 |
Calculated using Molinspiration (http://www.molinspiration.com) © Molinspiration Cheminformatics.
Expeimental LogP were measured by HPLC-MS12
Solubilities were measured in sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4, 0.1 M) containing 1% of DMSO.
Calculated LogP for most of the synthesized compounds lays within the Lipinsky rule’s borders.13 Experimental LogP values for compounds 3b-d, 3i and 3j are very close to the calculated and in most cases are lesser. Thus the selected method can be used to predict logP for this type of compounds. Solubilities in water (sodium phosphate buffer) of ureas 3a-j (Table 1) lie in a narrow interval of 50-90 μM and shows slight dependence on the structure of adamantane part of the molecule.
The potency of the compounds was then measured against the human sEH. Data (Table 2) confirm that introduction of a single methylene spacer between adamantane substituent and the urea group is one of the most activity-enhancing structural change.14 Further enlargement of such spacer leads to dramatic drop of activity, 15-fold when 3c with ethylene spacer compared to spacerless 3a and 170-fold for 3d with butylene spacer compared to 3a. Surprisingly compound 3e with 1,4-phenylene spacer show relatively moderate activity (94.2 nM) while previously tested diureas15 and thioureas16 bearing this fragment possessed low inhibitory activity of 0.7-57 μM. Moreover, the 2-fluoro substituted urea 3a is 4-fold more active if compared to unsubstituted 1-(adamantan-1-yl)-3-phenyl urea and 37-fold more active than 2-hydroxy substituted analog (Table 2). This is quite unexpected, and reflect the particular properties of the C-F bond, and the interaction of the fluorine atom with its environment. Recently, thioureas containing fluorophenyl fragment were found to inhibit the human sEH. Interestingly the ureas described herein with similar structure of the reported thioureas are more potent, confirming previous findings.16
Table 2.
IC50 values for compounds 3a-j.
Introduction of one methyl substituent into bridgehead position of adamantane leads to 2.5-fold increase of activity (1.5 nM for compound 3f compared to 3.7 nM of 3a, Table 2). However, the addition of a second methyl group sets the activity back to the value of unsubstituted analog. Activity of compound 3h with three methyl substituents in each available bridgehead position of adamantane is 25-fold less than activity of 3a. Such decrease of activity could be explained by the lack of space for the bulky 3,5,7-trimethyladamantane in the most appropriate conformation available for these compounds.
An interesting result was obtained when adamantyl fragment was linked to the urea group by its bridge position. The activity of compound 3i is 3.7-fold better than activity of 3a and the only difference between them is the type of carbon atom in adamantane linked with urea nitrogen. To understand the origins of this activity difference between 1- and 2-adamantyl containing ureas the X-ray analysis of a single crystal was made (Figure 1). The asymmetric unit of the 3i contains three molecules. The molecules are connected via six strong classical intermolecular hydrogen bonds, N2A–H2A···O1C, N3A–H3A···O1C, N2B–H2B···01A, N3B–H3B···01A, N2C–H2C···O1B, N3C–H3C···O1B. The H···A distances are 2.09, 2.20, 2.12, 2.10, 2.42 and 2.06 Å respectively and the angles are 157.8, 152.5, 150.3, 154.9, 132.9 and 148.0° respectively. There are also three unusual intramolecular hydrogen bonds, C36A–H36A···01A, C36B–H36B···O1B, C22C–H22C···O1C with H···A distances 2.27, 2.37 and 2.53 Å respectively and the angles of 120.2, 113.5 and 117.9° respectively. Symmetry codes: (i) –x, 1/2 + y, 1/2 – z. The crystallographic data for the investigated compound have been deposited in the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as supplementary publication number CCDC 1543475.
Fig. 1.
ORTEP diagram showing 50 % probability anisotropic displacement ellipsoids of non-hydrogen atoms for compound 3i according to single crystal XRD data collected at 298(2) K.
The 2-fluorophenyl ring is twisted in position in which fluorine atom positioned closely to oxygen atom of the urea group. Such orientation of fluorine allows it to form hydrogen bonds with Tyr383 or Tyr466 at the sEH active site and does not interfere the formation of hydrogen bonds between the NH’s and Asp335. Such unpredicted orientation of fluorine atom gives very good explanation for the high activity of compound 3i.
3. Conclusions
A series of soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) inhibitors containing a 2-fluorophenyl fragment was developed. Inhibition potency of the described compounds ranges from 0.7 to 630.9 nM. 1-(Adamantan-1-ylmethyl)-3-(2-fluorophenyl) urea(3b, IC50 = 0.7 nM) and 1-(adamantan-2-yl)-3-(2-fluorophenyl) urea (3i, IC50 =1.0 nM) were found to be the most potent sEH inhibitors within the described series.
4. Experimental
4.1. General methods
The mass spectra were obtained on a Thermo Scientific Incos 50 mass spectrometer and on an Agilent 7820/5975 GC/MS system (HP-5MS quartz capillary column, 30 m; carrier gas helium; oven temperature programming from 80 to 280°C; injector temperature 250°C). The 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker DRX-500 spectrometer at 500.13 MHz using DMSO- d6 as solvent and tetramethylsilane as reference. The elemental compositions were determined on a Perkin Elmer 2400 Series II analyzer. 2-Fluorophenyl isocyanate was commercial product (Sigma Aldrich). Initial adamantyl amines were synthesized according to the known procedures.8 The solvents were dried according to standard procedures.
4.2. General procedure for the synthesis of ureas 3a-j.
To 1 equiv. of corresponding amine 2a-j in 40 equiv. of DMF was added 1 equiv. of 2-fluorophenyl isocyanate and 1 equiv. of Et3N (2 equiv. when amine used in form of hydrochloride) at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. After adding 1N HC1 and water, the resulting white precipitates were collected by suction filtration.
4.2.1. 1-(Adamantan-1-yl)-3-(2-fluorophenyl) urea (3a)
White solid, mp 199-200 °C. 19F NMR: δ −131.57 (s, 1F). 1H NMR: δ 8.12 (t, 1H, 6-Ph, J 8.3), 8.10 (s, 1H, NH), 7.14 (q, 1H, 3-Ph, J 8.2), 7.04 (t, 1H, 5-Ph, J 8.2), 6.90-6.85 (m, 1H, 4-Ph), 6.45 (s, 1H, NH), 2.02 (s, 3H, Ad), 1.93 (d, 6H, Ad, J 2.8), 1.63 (t, 6H, Ad, J 2.8). MS (EI) m/z: 288 (3.5%, [M]+), 135 (14.4%, [Ad]+), 111 (100%, [F-Ph-NH2]+), 93 (11.0%), 79 (12.5%). Elemental analysis: calcd. for C17H21FN2O C70.81%, H7.34%, F6.59%, N9.71%; found C70.82%, H7.35%, F6.60%, N9.69%.
4.2.2. 1-[(Adamantan-1-yl)methyl]-3-(2-fluorophenyl) urea (3b)
White solid, mp 191-192 °C. 19F NMR: δ −131.62 (s, 1F). 1H NMR: δ 8.29 (s, 1H, NH), 8.16 (t, 1H, 6-Ph, J 8.3), 7.16 (q, 1H, 3-Ph, J 8.1), 7.05 (t, 1H, 5-Ph, J 8.2), 6.92-6.87 (m, 1H, 4-Ph), 6.60 (t, 1H, NH, J 5.9), 2.81 (d, 2H, CH2-NH, J 6.0), 1.94 (s, 3H, Ad), 1.64 (q, 6H, Ad, J 12.0), 1.46 (d, 6H, Ad, J 2.5).13C NMR: δ 155.07 (s, 1C, C=O), 151.36 (d, 1C, C-F, JCF 240.2), 128.61 (d, 1C, 4-Ph, JCF 10.0), 124.37 (d, 1C, 5-Ph, JCF 3.8), 121.10 (d, 1C, 6-Ph, JCF 7.5), 119.71 (s, 1C, 1-Ph), 114.69 (d, 1C, 3-Ph, JCF 18.8), 50.84 (s, 1C, CH2-NH), 39.72 (s, 3C, Ad), 36.60 (s, 3C, Ad), 33.40 (s, 1C, Ad quart), 27.72 (s, 3C, Ad). MS (EI) m/z: 302 (3.0%, [M]+), 135 (12.2%, [Ad]+), 111 (100%, [F-Ph-NH2]+), 93 (10.0%), 79 (13.5%). Elemental analysis: calcd. for C18H23FN2O C71.50%, H7.67%, F6.28%, N9.26%; found C71.58%, H7.65%, F6.31%, N9.22%.
4.2.3. 1-[1-(Adamantan-1-yl)ethyl]-3-(2-fluorophenyl) urea (3c)
White solid, mp 172-173 °C. 19F NMR: δ −131.60 (s, 1F). 1H NMR: δ 8.25 (s, 1H, NH), 8.18 т (1H, 6-Ph, J 8.3), 7.16 (q, 1H, 3-Ph, J 8.1), 7.05 (t, 1H, 5-Ph, J 8.1), 6.92-6.87 (m, 1H, 4-Ph), 6.49 (d, 1H, NH, J 9.2), 2.52 (t, 1H, CH(CH3)-NH, J 1.7), 1.96 (s, 3H, Ad), 1.70-1.45 (m, 12H, Ad), 0.96 (d, 3H, CH3, J 6.8). MS (EI) m/z: 316 (2.0%, [M]+), 135 (14.0%, [Ad]+), 111 (100%, [F-Ph-NH2]+), 107 (5.0%), 93 (11.0%), 79 (14.0%). Elemental analysis: calcd. for C19H25FN2O C72.12%, H7.96%, F6.00%, N8.85%; found C72.10%, H7.95%, F5.98%, N8.87%.
4.2.4. 1-[1-(Adamantan-1-yl)butane-2-yl]-3-(2-fluorophenyl) urea (3d)
White solid, mp 154-155 °C. 19F NMR: δ −131.58 (s, 1F). 1H NMR: δ 8.17 (t, 1H, 6-Ph, J 8.3), 8.11 (s, 1H, NH), 7.15 (q, 1H, 3-Ph, J 8.1), 7.05 (t, 1H, 5-Ph, J 7.8), 6.92-6.86 (m, 1H, 4-Ph), 6.41 (d, 1H, NH, J 8.6), 3.68 (q, 1H, CH(C2H5)-NH, J 6.1), 1.90 (s, 3H, Ad), 1.67-1.45 (m, 12H, Ad), 1.41-1.30 (m, 2H, CH3-CH2-CH), 1.15 (d, 2H, C-CH2-CH, J 8.7), 0.82 (t, 3H, CH3, J 7.3) MS (EI) m/z: 344 (1.0%, [M]+), 315 (2.0%, [M-C2H5]+), 135 (22.0%, [Ad]+), 111 (100%, [F-Ph-NH2]+), 93 (10.0%), 79 (12.0%). Elemental analysis: calcd. for C21H29FN2O C73.22%, H8.49%, F5.52%, N8.13%; found C72.25%, H8.45%, F5.55%, N8.16%.
4.2.5. 1-[4-(Adamantan-1-yl)phenyl]-3-(2-fluorophenyl) urea (3e)
White solid, mp 183-184 °C. 19F NMR: δ −131.63 (s, 1F). 1H NMR: δ 8.99 (s, 1H, NH), 8.50 (s, 1H, NH), 8.16 (t, 1H, 6-Ph, J 8.1), 7.32 (dd, 4H, Ph, J 8.6, J 51), 7.22 (q, 1H, 3-Ph, J 8.1), 7.13 (t, 1H 5-Ph, J 7.7), 7.01-6.96 (m, 1H, 4-Ph), 2.05 (s, 3H, Ad), 1.84 (s, 6H, Ad), 1.76-1.70 (m, 6H, Ad). MS (EI) m/z: 364 (17.9%, [M]+), 227 (10.4%, [Ad-Ph-NH2]+), 196 (5.1%), 170 (24.3%), 133 (5.3%, [Ad]+), 111 (100%, [F-Ph-NH2]+), 106 (7.3%), 93 (8.5%), 79 (10.6%). Elemental analysis: calcd. for C23H25FN2O C75.80%, H6.91%, F5.21%, N7.69%; found C75.88%, H6.94%, F5.25%, N7.66%.
4.2.6. 1-[3-methyl(Adamantan-1-yl)]-3-(2-fluorophenyl) urea (3f)
White solid, mp 149-150 °C. 19F NMR: δ-131.60 (s, 1F). 1H NMR: δ 8.12 (t, 1H, 6-Ph, J 8.3), 8.10 (s, 1H, NH), 7.14 (q, 1H, 3-Ph, J 8.1), 7.04 (t, 1H, 5-Ph, J 7.7), 6.90-6.85 (m, 1H, 4-Ph), 6.46 (s, 1H, NH), 2.07-1.37 (m, 14H, Ad), 0.81 (s, 3H, CH3). MS (EI) m/z: 302 (1.9%, [M]+), 149 (8.2%, [CH3-Ad]+), 111 (100%, [F-Ph-NH2]+), 107 (12.2%), 93 (20.8%), 79 (11.9%). Elemental analysis: calcd. for C18H23FN2O C71.50%, H7.67%, F6.28%, N9.26%; found C71.56%, H7.65%, F6.28%, N9.19%.
4.2.7. 1-[3,5-dimethyl(Adamantan-1-yl)]-3-(2-fluorophenyl) urea (3g)
White solid, mp 181-182 °C. 19F NMR: δ −131.60 (s, 1F). 1H NMR: δ 8.11 (t, 1H, 6-Ph, J 8.3), 8.09 (s, 1H, NH), 7.14 (q, 1H, 3-Ph, J 8.1), 7.04 (t, 1H 5-Ph, J 7.7), 6.90-6.86 (m, 1H, 4-Ph), 6.47 (s, 1H, NH), 2.09-1.11 (m, 13H, Ad), 0.82 (s, 6H, 2CH3). MS (EI) m/z: 316 (1.8%, [M]+), 111 (100%, [F-Ph-NH2]+), 107 (13.1%), 93 (5.5%), 83 (11.2%). Elemental analysis: calcd. for C19H25FN2O C72.12%, H7.96%, F6.0%, N8.85%; found C72.16%, H7.90%, F6.08%, N8.83%.
4.2.8. 1-[3,5,7-trimethyl(Adamantan-1-yl)]-3-(2-fluorophenyl) urea (3h)
White solid, mp 212-213 °C. 19F NMR: δ −131.60 (s, 1F). 1H NMR: δ 8.11 (t, 1H, 6-Ph, J 8.3), 8.09 (s, 1H, NH), 7.14 (q, 1H, 3-Ph, J 8.1), 7.03 (t, 1H 5-Ph, J 7.7), 6.90-6.87 (m, 1H, 4-Ph), 6.48 (s, 1H, NH), 1.51-1.02 (m, 12H, Ad), 0.83 (s, 9H, 3CH3). MS (EI) m/z: 330 (0.7%, [M]+), 121 (13.9%), 111 (100%, [F-Ph-NH2]+), 107 (7.9%), 93 (5.5%), 79 (5.1%). Elemental analysis: calcd. for C20H27FN2O C72.70%, H8.24%, F5.75%, N8.48%; found C72.74%, H8.29%, F5.77%, N8.39%.
4.2.9. 1-(Adamantan-2-yl)-3-(2-fluorophenyl) urea (3i)
White solid, mp 196-197 °C. 19F NMR: δ −131.59 (s, 1F). 1H NMR: δ 8.36 (s, 1H, NH), 8.18 (t, 1H, 6-Ph, J 8.3), 7.16 (q, 1H, 3-Ph, J 8.1), 7.06 (t, 1H 5-Ph, J 7.7), 6.95 (d, 1H, NH, J 8.0), 6.91-6.87 (m, 1H, 4-Ph), 3.78 (d, 1H, CH-NH, J 7.8), 1.89-1.55 (m, 14H, Ad). MS (EI) m/z: 288 (1.6%, [M]+), 111 (100%, [F-Ph-NH2]+), 91 (6.6%), 79 (8.9%). Elemental analysis: calcd. for C17H21FN2O C70.81%, H7.34%, F6.59%, N9.71%; found C70.84%, H7.28%, F6.61%, N9.77%.
4.2.10. 1-[2-(Adamantan-2-yl)pentane-1-yl]-3-(2-fluorophenyl) urea (3j)
White solid, mp 137-138 °C. 19F NMR: δ −131.58 (s, 1F). 1H NMR: δ 8.31 (s, 1H, NH), 8.17 (t, 1H, 6-Ph, J 8.1), 7.16 (q, 1H, 3-Ph, J 8.1), 7.06 (t, 1H, 5-Ph, J 7.8), 6.92-6.86 (m, 1H, 4-Ph), 6.48 (t, 1H, NH, J 5.5), 3.30-2.97 (m, 2H, CH2-NH), 1.95-1.38 (m, 16H, Ad-CH), 1.35-1.28 (m, 2H, CH3-CH2), 1.25-1.11 (m, 2H, CH3-CH2-CH2), 0.88 (t, 3H, CH3, J 6.9). MS (EI) m/z: 358 (1.1%, [M]+), 315 (1.8%, [M-C3H7]+), 135 (11.5%, [Ad]+), 111 (100%, [F-Ph-NH2]+), 93 (9.0%), 79 (6.0%). Elemental analysis: calcd. for C22H31FN2O C73.71%, H8.72%, F5.30%, N7.81%; found C73.69%, H8.73%, F5.29%, N7.80%.
4.3. Determination of inhibitory potency (IC50) by fluorescent assay15.
Enzyme (~1 nM human sEH) was incubated at 30 °C with inhibitors ([I]final = 0.4 – 100,000 nM) for 5 min in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (200 μL, pH 7.4) containing 0.1 mg/mL of BSA and 1% of DMSO. The substrate (cyano(2-methoxynaphthalen-6-yl)methyl trans-(3-phenyloxyran-2-yl)methylcarbonate, CMNPC) was then added ([S]final = 5 μM). Activity was assessed by measuring the appearance of the fluorescent 6-methoxynaphthaldehyde product (λem = 330 nm, λex = 465 nm) at 30 °C during a 10 min incubation (Spectramax M2; Molecular Device, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA). The IC50 values that are the concentrations of inhibitors that reduce activity by 50% were calculated from at least five different concentrations, each in triplicate, with at least 2 on either side of 50% activity mark.
Highlights.
Ureas with adamantane and fluoroaromatic fragments were studied as sEH inhibitors.
10 new ureas with IC50 up to 0.7 nM were synthesized.
Extra hydrogen bond between the fluorine atom and sEH discovered by X-Ray crystallography.
Found no effect of changes in the adamantyl on the electron structure of the fluoroaromatic ring.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Russian Fund for Basic Research (grant number 18-43-343002) and by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (base part of state assignment for 2017–2019; project no. 4.7491.2017/BCh), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) grant R01 ES002710, and NIEHS Superfund Research Program grant P42 ES004699.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Arand M; Grant DF; Beetham JK; Friedberg T; Oesch F; Hammock BD FEBS Lett. 1994, 338, 251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Imig JD; Zhao X; Zaharis CZ; Olearczyk JJ; Pollock DM; Newman JW; Kim IH; Watanabe T; Hammock BD Hypertension. 2005, 46, 975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fleming I; Rueben A; Popp R; Fisslthaler B; Schrodt S; Sander A; Haendeler J; Falck JR; Morisseau C; Hammock BD; Busse R Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007, 27, 2612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Imig JD Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2008, 4, 165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hwang SH; Tsai HJ; Liu JY; Morisseau C; Hammock BD J Med Chem. 2007, 50, 3825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Morisseau C; Goodrow MH; Newman JW; Wheelock CE; Dowdy DL; Hammock BD Biochem Pharm. 2002, 63,1599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Burmistrov V; Morisseau C; Harris TR; Butov G; Hammock BD Bioorg. Chem. 2018, 76, 510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zarriello S; Tuazon JP; Corey S; Schimmel S; Rajani M; Gorsky A; Incontri D; Hammock BD; Borlongan CV Prog. Neurobiol. 2018. (In Press) 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2018.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rose TE; Morisseau C; Liu JY; Inceoglu B; Jones PD; Sanborn JR; Hammock BD J Med Chem. 2010, 53, 7067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Morisseau C; Hammock BD Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2013, 53, 37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.North EJ; Scherman MS; Bruhn DF; Scarborough JS; Maddox MM; Jones V; Grzegorzewicz A; Yang L; Hess T; Morisseau C; Jackson M; McNeil MR; Lee RE Bioorg. Med. Chem, 2013, 21, 2587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chiang P-C; Hu Y Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2009, 12, 250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lipinski CA; Lombardo F; Dominy BW; Feeney PJ Adv. Drug Del. Rev, 2001, 46, 3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Burmistrov V; Morisseau C; Harris TR; Butov GM; Hammock BD Bioorg. Chem, 2018, 76, 510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Burmistrov V; Morisseau C; Lee KSS; Shihadih D; Harris TR; Butov GM; Hammock BD Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett, 2014, 24, 2193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Burmistrov V; Morisseau C; Pitushkin D; Karlov D; Fayzullin RR; Butov GM; Hammock BD Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett, 2018, 28, 2302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jones PD; Wolf NM; Morisseau C; Whetstone P; Hock B; Hammock BD Anal. Biochem. 2005, 343, 66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]