Skip to main content
The Journal of Nutrition logoLink to The Journal of Nutrition
. 2019 Dec 13;150(3):492–504. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxz290

Vitamin D Status Increases During Pregnancy and in Response to Vitamin D Supplementation in Rural Gambian Women

Kerry S Jones 1,2,, Sarah R Meadows 1,2, Inez Schoenmakers 1,3, Ann Prentice 1,4, Sophie E Moore 4,5
PMCID: PMC7056615  PMID: 31834380

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Vitamin D is important to maternal, fetal, and infant health, but quality data on vitamin D status in low- and middle-income countries and response to cholecalciferol supplementation in pregnancy are sparse.

OBJECTIVE

We characterized vitamin D status and vitamin D metabolite change across pregnancy and in response to cholecalciferol supplementation in rural Gambia.

METHODS

This study was a secondary analysis of samples collected in a 4-arm trial of maternal nutritional supplementation [iron folic acid (FeFol); multiple micronutrients (MMN); protein energy (PE) as lipid-based supplement; PE + MMN]; MMN included 10 μg/d cholecalciferol. Plasma 25-hydroxycholecalciferol [25(OH)D3], 24,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol [24,25(OH)2D3], and C3-epimer-25-hydroxycholecalciferol [3-epi-25(OH)D3] were measured by LC-MS/MS in 863 women [aged 30 ± 7 y (mean ± SD)] in early pregnancy (presupplementation) and late pregnancy, (gestational age 14 ± 3 and 30 ± 1 wk). Changes in 25(OH)D3 and vitamin D metabolite concentrations and associations with pregnancy stage and maternal age and anthropometry were tested.

RESULTS

Early pregnancy 25(OH)D3 concentration was 70 ± 15 nmol/L and increased according to pregnancy stage (82 ± 18 and 87 ± 17 nmol/L in the FeFol and PE-arms) and to cholecalciferol supplementation (95 ± 19 and 90 ± 20 nmol/L in the MMN and PE + MMN-arms) (P < 0.0001). There was no difference between supplemented groups. Early pregnancy 25(OH)D3 was positively associated with maternal age and gestational age. Change in 25(OH)D3 was negatively associated with late pregnancy, but not early pregnancy, triceps skinfold thickness. The pattern of change of 24,25(OH)2D3 mirrored that of 25(OH)D3 and appeared to flatten as pregnancy progressed, whereas 3-epi-25(OH)D3 concentration increased across pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

This study provides important data on the vitamin D status of a large cohort of healthy pregnant women in rural Africa. Without supplementation, vitamin D status increased during pregnancy, demonstrating that pregnancy stage should be considered when assessing vitamin D status. Nutritionally relevant cholecalciferol supplementation further increased vitamin D status. These data are relevant to the development of fortification and supplementation policies in pregnant women in West Africa.

Keywords: Africa, nutritional requirements, pregnancy, vitamin D metabolism, cholecalciferol, season, supplementation, lipid-based nutrient supplement

Introduction

Vitamin D is of relevance to maternal, fetal, and infant health globally in relation to pregnancy-related complications (e.g., pre-eclampsia and gestational diabetes), preterm birth, and infant-related outcomes (1, 2). In particular, meta-analyses of observational data (3, 4) and vitamin D supplementation trials (2, 5, 6) provide evidence for a beneficial effect of vitamin D on birth weight and size and reduced risk of being born small for gestational age. In relation to other health effects, although some data provide evidence for a beneficial effect of higher vitamin D status, these observations have yet to be consistently borne out in supplementation trials, e.g., in relation to gestational diabetes (7). Nevertheless, vitamin D deficiency in pregnancy remains a concern and is of interest to international organizations with the goal to optimize vitamin D status for maternal and infant health (8, 9).

Globally, 54% of pregnant women are estimated to have a plasma/serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin [25(OH)D] concentration <50 nmol/L and 18% <25 nmol/L indicating a concerning degree of vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency (10). More recent reports have detailed vitamin D status in pregnant women in Nigeria (11) and Tunisia (12), and indicated a 25(OH)D serum concentration of <50 nmol/L in 29% and 87%, respectively. However, it is evident that there is an uneven global distribution of studies, with few in African and Southeast Asian countries (13, 14). Authors of a recent report concluded that 65% of low- and middle-income countries had no published data that were suitable for inclusion in their systematic literature review (15). Furthermore, reports of vitamin D status from African countries are often of small sample size and have often used nonstandardized methods to measure vitamin D status. Therefore, there is a need for better characterization of vitamin D status in African regions particularly in pregnant women. Ethnic differences in vitamin D status and vitamin D metabolism [e.g., related to vitamin D binding protein (DBP) genotype, or parathyroid responsiveness] may also potentially impact vitamin D requirements and response to vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy, thus studies in different ethnic populations are warranted and are of importance in development of global nutrition policies (16).

Changes in 25(OH)D concentration, the primary marker of vitamin D status, are not well characterized throughout pregnancy and data are conflicting (17–24). Lack of longitudinal data, pregnancy-related physiological changes (e.g., changes in plasma volume and protein concentrations), and seasonal fluctuations lead to uncertainty over how vitamin D status may change in pregnancy and consequently whether thresholds for vitamin D deficiency are the same for nonpregnant and pregnant adults. Such targets are important in the context of not only ensuring vitamin D sufficiency in the mother, but also that of the newborn (24).

Pregnancy-related changes in other vitamin D metabolites, and whether they track changes in 25(OH)D, are not well defined (24, 25). Changes in 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [24,25(OH)2D] may provide information on the relative activation of catabolic pathways (26, 27), including in pregnancy where CYP24A1 may be downregulated (28). Changes in C3-epimer of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [3-epi-25(OH)D], a metabolite that may contribute to vitamin D activity, are also not certain. The reported contribution of either metabolite to vitamin D status will depend on the analytical methodology. Chromatographic methods that do not resolve 3-epi-25(OH)D from 25(OH)D and immunoassay methods for 25(OH)D that cross-react with 24,25(OH)2D may lead to an overestimation of vitamin D status (26, 29). In addition, some immunoassays may underreport 25(OH)D because of the presence of high DBP concentrations, as observed during pregnancy (30).

Vitamin D supplementation is generally effective in raising plasma/serum 25(OH)D concentrations, including in pregnant women (2, 24). However, there are few studies of vitamin D supplementation at doses (≤10 μg/d) in line with recommendations [e.g., from the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (31) or the Institute of Medicine estimated average requirement (32)] that may be more typical of population or nationwide supplementation or fortification programs (9). In pregnant women with known vitamin D deficiency, the WHO recommended nutrient intake is 5 μg/d (200 IU) (33).

Therefore, in a secondary analysis of samples collected as part of a randomized controlled trial of multiple-micronutrient supplementation including vitamin D, and designed to enhance infant immune development (34, 35), 25(OH)D and other vitamin D metabolites were quantified by LC-MS/MS. Samples were available from both early pregnancy (presupplementation) and late pregnancy. The aims of this work were to 1) characterize vitamin D status in a large pregnancy cohort in sub-Saharan Africa, 2) determine the impact on vitamin D status of nutritionally relevant daily doses of supplemental vitamin D (10 μg/d), and 3) describe vitamin D metabolite concentrations across gestation.

Methods

Samples and data were collected as part of the ENID (Early Nutrition and Infant Immune Development) trial (ISRCTN49285450) conducted from MRC Keneba, MRC Unit The Gambia in the rural area of West Kiang, a primarily subsistence farming community. At a latitude of 13°North, UVB-containing sunshine is available year-round (15), and most members of this predominantly Muslim community do not wear clothes that prevent sunshine exposure to hands, arms, and face. The Gambia has 2 distinct seasons, a “dry” season between November and May characterized by hot, sunny days, and a “wet” season between June and October with more cloud cover, higher humidity, and heavy rainfall. During the wet season, farming activities are at their peak. A majority of women undertake farming activities (36) and women continue these throughout pregnancy (37). Further details about the region and its demographics have been reported (38).

Study information

Full details of the ENID trial have been published (34, 35, 39) and are summarized here in the context of the presented work. Women aged 18–45 y, not severely anemic (hemoglobin <7 g/dL) or with HIV infection, and premenopausal were recruited. The study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving the participants were conducted as approved by the joint Gambia Government-MRC Ethics Committee (Project number SCC1126v2). Trained staff explained the study to participants, and informed, written consent was obtained.

Women were visited and interviewed monthly by fieldworkers. Pregnancy was initially indicated by human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) testing (QuickVue™ One-Step hCG urine test, bioMerieux) and then confirmed and gestational age assessed by ultrasound (Siemens ACUSON Antares Ultrasound Imaging System, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.). After confirmation of pregnancy, women were randomly assigned to 1 of the 4 intervention arms, iron-folic acid (FeFol) tablets, multiple micronutrient (MMN) tablets, a protein-energy (PE) lipid-nutrient supplement (LNS), or the PE supplement with multiple micronutrients (PE + MMN). FeFol is the standard supplement advised in pregnancy according to Gambian Government guidelines. MMN arms included 10 μg/d (400 IU) of cholecalciferol (vitamin D3). A full description of the contents of each supplement can be found in Moore et al. (34). Compliance percentage was determined either through counting the remaining tablets or estimation of remaining LNS supplement at the end of each week (39). Participants were included in this analysis if a plasma sample was available for vitamin D analysis either at recruitment (“early pregnancy” and presupplementation) or at 30 weeks of gestation (“late pregnancy”). Samples were collected throughout the year between February 2010 and October 2013.

Data and sample collection

Participant data and anthropometry measurements were collected by trained fieldworkers or midwives, and are described in full elsewhere (34). Maternal blood samples were collected into lithium heparin blood tubes from a forearm vein in the morning after an overnight fast. Plasma was separated by centrifugation at at 1800 × g for 10 min at 4°C, stored at −70°C, and subsequently transported to the MRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory on dry ice and stored at −70°C.

Sample analysis

The quantitation of plasma 25-hydroxyergocalciferol [25(OH)D2], 25-hydroxycholecalciferol [25(OH)D3], and C3-epimer of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol [3-epi-25(OH)D3] was performed based on a published LC-MS/MS method (40) with modifications and the inclusion of 24,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol [24,25(OH)2D3] using a Waters Acquity ultra-performance liquid chromatography instrument and AB Sciex 5500 QTrap mass spectrometer. The method used separate isotope-labeled internal standards for each compound (for full details see Supplemental Methods). The limit of quantification (LOQ) was 1.5 nmol/L for 25(OH)D2, 25(OH)D3, and 3-epi-25(OH)D3 analytes, and 2.5 nmol/L for 24,25(OH)2D3. The MRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory is a member of the Vitamin D Standardization Program, and quality assurance of the assay was performed as part of the Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (www.deqas.org) and performance assessed against NIST SRM 972a (for assay performance see Supplemental Table 1).

Data analysis

Data analysis was performed with Stata 14.2 (StataCorp LLC). Because only a few samples contained 25(OH)D2 above the LOQ, all data analysis was performed with 25(OH)D3 only. Where vitamin D metabolite concentrations were less than the LOQ, values were computed by dividing the LOQ by the square root of 2 (41); assigned values were 1.1 nmol/L and 1.8 nmol/L for 3-epi-25(OH)D3 and 24,25(OH)2D3, respectively. Normally distributed data are presented as mean ± SD. Skewed data [i.e., 24,25(OH)2D3 and 3-epi-25(OH)D3 and their ratios] are presented as geometric mean and geometric mean SD. Parity is presented as median and range.

Supplement group differences in both early and late pregnancy, and differences between early and late pregnancy were tested by ANOVA. Pairwise comparison of group means was tested post hoc with Scheffé procedure. For skewed data, analysis was performed using logged values. Pearson's chi-square test was used for categorical data and the Kruskal-Wallis H to test for equality of medians (i.e., parity). Tests were not adjusted for weeks of pregnancy because there was no difference between supplement groups in this parameter.

The effect of season on 25(OH)D3 concentration was investigated with the use of Fourier regression (42, 43), with pairs of sine and cosine terms as independent predictors of 25(OH)D3. Annual data were aggregated by the day of year on which the blood sample was collected. The coefficient of cyclic variation summarized the magnitude of the seasonal variation (42). In multivariate regression models in early pregnancy, the sine and cosine terms were included to allow other covariates to be interpreted independent of seasonal effects.

We investigated biologically plausible predictors of early pregnancy 25(OH)D3 concentration with use of linear regression. Significant predictors of age and weeks of pregnancy were included in the multivariate model, which also included Fourier terms to control for any effect of time of year. To investigate predictors of attained 25(OH)D3, both early pregnancy 25(OH)D3 concentration and supplementation group were included in all models.

Vitamin D metabolite concentrations and their ratios were compared between pregnancy stage and supplementation group using ANOVA with Scheffé post hoc test. Percent 24,25(OH)2D3 and % 3-epi-25(OH)D3 refer to the relative concentration of the metabolite to 25(OH)D3 concentration, that is 24,25(OH)2D3/25(OH)D3 *100.

The effect of gestational age on vitamin D metabolite concentrations and the ratios of the metabolites to 25(OH)D were investigated using a mixed linear model including weeks of pregnancy (fixed effect) and participant ID (random effect). To describe the normal physiological pattern in pregnancy, this analysis was performed in the FeFol group only. Possible nonlinear associations were assessed by the inclusion of a quadratic term (predictor*predictor), but removed from the model if not significant (P > 0.05). Metabolite concentrations below the LOQ were excluded for this and for the following analysis; results with these data are included in the Supplemental Material (Supplemental Table 2).

Relations between vitamin D metabolites and their ratios against 25(OH)D3 concentration in early and late pregnancy were investigated using linear regression. Quadratic terms were also tested but were nonsignificant (P > 0.05). Data from the 4 groups were pooled because there were no supplement group differences in 25(OH)D and metabolite relations or ratios (investigated by the inclusion of an interaction term between supplement group and the predictor variable). Differences between early and late pregnancy in metabolite relations were tested with the inclusion of interaction term between time point (early/late pregnancy) and the continuous predictor variable.

Results

Presupplementation, early pregnancy participant characteristics, and vitamin D status

Participant characteristics and early pregnancy plasma 25(OH)D3 and vitamin D metabolite concentrations are shown in Table 1. There were no differences between supplement groups in age, weeks of pregnancy, anthropometric indices, or vitamin D metabolite concentrations (P > 0.5). In early pregnancy, the gestational age ranged between 7.0 and 20.8 wk. The distribution of the month of sampling was not different between supplementation groups (P = 1.0).

TABLE 1.

Baseline characteristics and vitamin D status in early and late pregnancy for all participants and by supplement group1

Early pregnancy Late pregnancy
Supplement group2 Supplement group2
Full cohort FeFol MMN PE PE + MMN P FeFol MMN PE PE + MMN P
n 863 214 215 217 217 201 208 195 204
Age, y 29.6 ± 6.7 29.9 ± 6.5 29.3 ± 6.7 29.1 ± 6.4 30.1 ± 7.0 NS
Weight, kg 55.6 ± 9.7 55.1 ± 9.0 55.5 ± 9.9 56.1 ± 9.3 55.8 ± 10.7 NS
Height, cm 161.8 ± 5.8 161.7 ± 6.1 162.0 ± 5.7 161.9 ± 5.6 161.6 ± 5.9 NS
BMI, kg/m2 21.2 ± 3.5 21.1 ± 3.2 21.1 ± 3.8 21.4 ± 3.3 21.3 ± 3.6 NS
MUAC,3 cm 26.7 ± 3.3 26.6 ± 3.1 26.7 ± 3.6 26.8 ± 3.0 26.7 ± 3.4 NS
Triceps skinfold thickness,3 cm 14.7 ± 6.4 14.9 ± 7.1 14.3 ± 6.0 14.9 ± 6.2 14.8 ± 6.2 NS
Nulliparous,4n (%) 71 (8.3) 17 (8.0) 21 (9.8) 19 (8.8) 14 (6.5) NS
Parity,5[median (range)] 4 (0–12) 4 (0–12) 4 (0–10) 4 (0–11) 4 (0–11) NS
Weeks of pregnancy6 13.7 ± 3.3 13.8 ± 3.4 13.7 ± 3.3 13.7 ± 3.3 13.5 ± 3.1 NS
Plasma 25(OH)D3, nmol/L 70.2 ± 15.3 70.0 ± 15.7 71.4 ± 15.4 70.5 ± 14.7 69.1 ± 15.3 NS 81.5 ± 18.2* 94.9 ± 18.8*a 87.0 ± 17.2*b 90.3 ± 20.4*a,b <0.0001
∆25(OH)D37 10.8 ± 14.0 23.4 ± 14.9a 15.7 ± 14.0 21.2 ± 15.6a <0.0001
25(OH)D3 <50 nmol/L,8n (%) 64 (7.4) 23 (10.7) 12 (5.6) 12 (5.5) 17 (7.8) NS 8 (4.0)* 0 (0.0)* 3 (1.5)* 3 (1.5)* 0.02
25(OH)D3 ≥125 nmol/L, n (%) 2 (0.2) 1 (0.5) 1 (0.5) 0 (0) 0 (0) NS 3 (1.5) 16 (7.7)* 4 (2.1)* 15 (7.4)* 0.002
1

Data are means ± SDs unless otherwise indicated. P value is for difference between groups [ANOVA with Scheffé test, chi-square or Kruskal-Wallis H to test for equality of medians (for parity)]. a,b,cLabeled means in a row without a common superscript letter differ, P < 0.05. *Indicates within supplement group significant difference from early pregnancy for continuous variables. FeFol, iron folic acid; MMN, multiple micronutrients; MUAC, midupper arm circumference; PE, protein energy; PE + MMN, protein energy with multiple micronutrients; NS, nonsignificant (P ≥ 0.05); 25(OH)D3, 25-hydroxycholecalciferol.

2

MMN and PE + MMN supplements include 10 µg/d cholecalciferol.

3

Observations were not available for all participants, n = 858 (full cohort), n = 212 (FeFol), n = 213 (MMN), n = 216 (PE).

4

Observations were not available for all participants, n = 859 (full cohort), n = 213 (FeFol), n = 215 (MMN), n = 215 (PE), n = 216 (PE + MMN).

5

Values are median (range). Observations were not available for all participants, n = 846 (full cohort), n = 210 (FeFol), n = 212 (MMN), n = 213 (PE), n = 211 (PE + MMN).

6

Observations were not available for all participants, n = 862 (full cohort), n = 213 (FeFol).

7

Observations were not available for all participants, n = 200 (FeFol), n = 206 (MMN), n = 195 (PE), n = 204 (PE + MMN).

8

No participants had a 25(OH)D3 concentration <30 nmol/L.

In early pregnancy, the mean plasma 25(OH)D3 concentration was 70.2 ± 15.3 nmol/L. No woman had 25(OH)D3 <30 nmol/L. 25(OH)D2 was present above the LOQ in 50 (6%) samples in early pregnancy and in these women the mean concentration was 1.8 ± 0.4 nmol/L, consistent with low availability of vitamin D2 in this population.

Attained 25(OH)D3 concentration in late pregnancy

By late pregnancy, vitamin D status had significantly increased in each of the 4 supplementation groups, that is in those receiving no vitamin D and those receiving micronutrient supplements containing vitamin D (Table 1), with the shift to significantly higher concentration distribution of 25(OH)D3 concentration clearly visible in the vitamin D-supplemented groups (Figure 1). Attained 25(OH)D3 concentration was significantly higher in the two vitamin D-containing supplementation groups and in the PE group compared to the FeFol group (Table 1), but there was no difference between the MMN and PE + MMN groups.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Distribution of plasma 25(OH)D3 concentrations by pregnancy stage and supplement group. (A) FeFol; (B) MMN; (C) PE; (D) PE + MMN. FeFol, iron folic acid; MMN, multiple micronutrients; PE, protein energy; PE + MMN, protein energy with multiple micronutrients; 25(OH)D3, 25-hydroxycholecalciferol.

Expressed as the difference between early and late pregnancy, the change in 25(OH)D3 concentration was not different between MMN-containing groups nor between the non-MMN containing groups (i.e., FeFol and PE groups) (Table 1). In the FeFol group, the change was +10.8 ± 14.0 nmol/L and 20% of participants had a decrease in 25(OH)D3 concentration. In contrast, in the MMN only group, 5% of participants had a decrease in 25(OH)D3 concentration between early and late pregnancy. Vitamin D supplementation shifted the cohort distribution, reducing the percentage of participants in the MMN group with 25(OH)D3 concentration <50 nmol/L to zero, but increasing the proportion with a concentration >125 nmol/L (Figure 1; Table 1).

Predictors of early pregnancy 25(OH)D3 concentration

There was a small but significant effect of time of year on 25(OH)D3 plasma concentration (Figure 2). The difference between the modeled peak and nadir 25(OH)D3 concentration was 6.4 nmol/L, with the peak in September and nadir in March. The SD of this seasonal component was 2.2 nmol/L (coefficient of cyclic variation = 4.4%) (after correction for age, weight, and weeks of pregnancy). Investigated predictors of early pregnancy, presupplementation, and 25(OH)D3 concentration are shown in Table 2. 25(OH)D3 concentration was not associated with maternal size or adiposity, but maternal age and weeks of pregnancy positively predicted 25(OH)D3 concentration (Figure 3). A multivariate model including age, weeks of pregnancy, and Fourier terms to control for the effect of time of year explained 11% of the variability in plasma 25(OH)D3, with weeks of pregnancy predicting a 1.34 nmol/L higher 25(OH)D3 concentration for a 1-wk increase in gestational stage (P < 0.0001) (Table 2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Seasonal variation in plasma 25(OH)D3 concentration in early pregnancy. Observed (open circles) and Fourier regression modeled seasonal variation (solid line) in plasma 25(OH)D3 concentration in 862 women measured in early pregnancy. Day 1 constitutes 1 January in each year. Boxes indicate dry (November to May) or wet season (late June to early October). 25(OH)D3, 25-hydroxycholecalciferol.

TABLE 2.

Predictors of early pregnancy plasma 25(OH)D3 concentration1

Univariate model Multivariate model
n β ± SE P β ± SE P
Age, y 863 0.27 ± 0.08 0.001 0.18 ± 0.07 0.015
Weight, kg 863 −0.03 ± 0.05 0.6  —  —
Height, cm 863 −0.02 ± 0.09 0.8  —
BMI, kg/m2 863 −0.06 ± 0.15 0.7  —  —
MUAC, cm 858 0.01 ± 0.16 1.0  —  —
Triceps skinfold thickness, cm 858 −0.04 ± 0.08 0.6  —  —
Weeks of pregnancy 862 1.38 ± 0.15 <0.0001 1.34 ± 0.15 <0.0001
1

Biologically plausible predictors of 25(OH)D3 concentration were tested and the multivariate model included Fourier terms to control for the effect of the time of year. Factors were measured on the same day as blood sample collection. Parity was not included in the multivariate model because of a strong correlation with age. MUAC, midupper arm circumference; 25(OH)D3, 25-hydroxycholecalciferol.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

The relations between (A) weeks of pregnancy and (B) maternal chronological age and plasma 25(OH)D3 concentration in early pregnancy. Open symbols are observed 25(OH)D3 concentration. Solid line is the modeled line. 25(OH)D3, 25-hydroxycholecalciferol.

Participant characteristics as predictors of attained 25(OH)D

Participant characteristics influencing 25(OH)D3 concentration in late pregnancy were further investigated using a combined model with presupplementation, baseline 25(OH)D3 concentration, and study arm as covariates. In these combined models there were no significant interactions between predictor variables and supplementation group. Attained 25(OH)D3 concentration was positively associated with compliance and weeks on supplementation, and negatively with late pregnancy triceps skinfold thickness (Table 3). For every 1 cm greater triceps skinfold thickness in late pregnancy, attained 25(OH)D3 concentration was 0.2 nmol/L lower (P = 0.02). There were no associations with other anthropometric indices measured in either early or late pregnancy.

TABLE 3.

Predictors of attained plasma 25(OH)D3 concentration in late pregnancy1

Univariate model2 Multivariate model2, 3
n β ± SE P β ± SE P
Age, y 803 0.07 ± 0.08 0.4
Gestational age in late pregnancy, wk 803 −0.77 ± 0.56 0.2 −0.62 ± 0.55 0.3
Weight in early pregnancy, kg 803 −0.06 ± 0.05 0.3  —  —
Weight in late pregnancy, kg 802 −0.06 ± 0.05 0.3  —  —
Change in weight between early and late pregnancy, kg 802 −0.03 ± 0.17 0.8  —  —
MUAC in early pregnancy, cm 802 −0.14 ± 0.16 0.4  —  —
MUAC in late pregnancy, cm 803 −0.25 ± 0.16 0.1  —  —
Triceps skinfold thickness in early pregnancy, cm 802 −0.11 ± 0.0 0.2  —  —
Triceps skinfold thickness in late pregnancy, cm 803 −0.21 ± 0.09 0.02 −0.21 ± 0.09 0.02
Compliance, % 803 0.10 ± 0.04 0.02 0.10 ± 0.04 0.01
Weeks on supplement 798 0.97 ± 0.15 <0.0001 0.98 ± 0.15 <0.0001
1

MUAC, midupper arm circumference; 25(OH)D3, 25-hydroxycholecalciferol.

2

Early 25(OH)D3 concentration and supplementation group were included as covariates. Interactions between predictor variables and supplementation group were nonsignificant.

3

n = 798.

25(OH)D3 and vitamin D metabolites across gestation

We observed quadratic relations in both 25(OH)D3 and 24,25(OH)2D3 across gestation such that the positive linear increase observed in early pregnancy appeared to flatten towards late pregnancy. In contrast, 3-epi-25(OH)D3 concentration increased as pregnancy progressed (Figure 4A, B, C). These observations were also reflected in metabolite ratios against weeks of pregnancy (Figure 4D, E); the 25(OH)D3:24,25(OH)2D3 ratio was consistent across gestational age, whereas we observed a significant negative relation between the 25(OH)D3:3-epi-25(OH)D3 ratio and gestational age.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Relations between plasma 25(OH)D3 and vitamin D metabolites with gestational age determined with mixed model linear regression with random effect of participant ID and fixed effect of gestational age. Linear and quadratic terms ± SE are indicated on the graphs. (A) plasma 25(OH)D3, n = 215; (B) plasma 24,25(OH)2D3, n = 183; (C) plasma 3-epi-25(OH)D3, n = 215; (D) ratio of plasma 25(OH)D3 to 24,25(OH)2D3, n = 183; (E) ratio of plasma 25(OH)D3 to 3-epi-25(OH)D3, n = 215. 3-epi-25(OH)D3, C3-epimer-25-hydroxycholecalciferol; 24,25(OH)2D3, 24,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol; 25(OH)D3, 25-hydroxycholecalciferol.

Vitamin D metabolites in early and late pregnancy

Plasma concentrations of 24,25(OH)2D3 are reported in Table 4. There was a positive linear relation between 24,25(OH)2D3 and 25(OH)D3 concentration that was not different between early and late pregnancy (P = 0.3 interaction) (Figure 5A). In early pregnancy, there was a slight positive linear relation between 25(OH)D3:24,25(OH)2D3 and 25(OH)D3 (P = 0.03), but this was not significantly different from the nonsignificant relation observed in late pregnancy (P = 0.1 for interaction) (Figure 5C). We also performed the same regression analyses using assigned values for 24,25(OH)2D3 concentrations that were below the LOQ (Supplemental Table 2). In this scenario, slopes between 24,25(OH)2D3 and 25(OH)D3 were similar to those obtained using data above the LOQ. However, in contrast to using data above the LOQ, there were significant negative linear relations between the ratio 25(OH)D3:24,25(OH)2D3 with 25(OH)D3 in both early (β ± SE) (−0.082 ± 0.019, P < 0.0001) and late pregnancy (−0.060 ± 0.013, P < 0.0001).

TABLE 4.

Early and late pregnancy plasma vitamin D metabolites by supplement group1

Early pregnancy Late pregnancy
Supplement group2 Supplement group2
Total cohort FeFol MMN PE PE + MMN P FeFol MMN PE PE + MMN P
24,25(OH)2D3
n 778 190 199 196 193 196 203 184 194
 24,25(OH)2D3, nmol/L§ 3.3 ± 1.5 3.3 ± 1.6 3.3 ± 1.5 3.1 ± 1.5 3.4 ± 1.6 NS 4.0 ± 1.6*a 4.4 ± 1.5*a,b 4.8 ± 1.4*b,c 5.0 ± 1.5*c <0.0001
n (%) below LOQ 198 (25) 48 (25) 45 (23) 56 (29) 49 (25) 26 (13) 14 (7) 7 (4) 5 (9)
 ∆24,25(OH)2D3,3 nmol/L 0.9 ± 1.7a 1.3 ± 1.4a 1.8 ± 1.6b 2.0 ± 2.0b <0.0001
 %24,25(OH)2D3:25(OH)D3§ 4.7 ± 1.4 4.7 ± 1.5 4.6 ± 1.5 4.5 ± 1.5 4.9 ± 1.6 NS 5.0 ± 1.4a 4.7 ± 1.3a 5.5 ± 1.3*b 5.7 ± 1.4*b <0.0001
 25(OH)D3:24,25(OH)D2D3 ratio§ 21.4 ± 1.4 21.2 ± 1.5 21.6 ± 1.5 22.3 ± 1.5 20.6 ± 1.6 NS 20.0 ± 1.4a 21.4 ± 1.3a 18.0 ± 1.3*b 17.7 ± 1.4*b <0.0001
3-epi 25(OH)D3
 n 842 207 209 214 212 201 206 185 199
 3-epi 25(OH)D3, nmol/L§ 4.1 ± 1.4 4.1 ± 1.4 4.2 ± 1.3 4.0 ± 1.4 4.0 ± 1.4 NS 5.4 ± 1.4*a 6.3 ± 1.4* 5.7 ± 1.4*a 5.7 ± 1.4*a 0.0001
n (%) below LOQ 3 (0.4) 1 (0.5) 0 (0) 2 (0.9) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 ∆3-epi-25(OH)D3,4 nmol/L 1.5 ± 2.2a 2.2 ± 2.2b 1.8 ± 1.9a,b 1.8 ± 2.1a,b 0.007
 %3-epi-25(OH)D3:25(OH)D3§ 6.0 ± 1.3 6.0 ± 1.3 6.1 ± 1.3 5.8 ± 1.3 6.0 ± 1.3 NS 6.8 ± 1.3* 6.7 ± 1.3* 6.7 ± 1.3* 6.5 ± 1.3* 0.4
 25(OH)D3:3-epi 25(OH)D3 ratio§ 16.7 ± 1.3 16.6 ± 1.3 16.5 ± 1.3 17.1 ± 1.3 16.6 ± 1.3 NS 14.7 ± 1.3* 14.8 ± 1.3* 15.0 ± 1.3* 15.4 ± 1.3* 0.4
1

Data are means ± SDs or geometric means ± geometric mean SDs§. P value is for differences between groups (ANOVA with Scheffé test). a,b,cLabeled means in a row without a common superscript letter differ, P < 0.05. *Indicates within supplement group significant difference from early pregnancy for continuous variables. FeFol, iron folic acid; LOQ, limit of quantitation; MMN, multiple micronutrients; PE, protein energy; PE + MMN, protein energy with multiple micronutrients; 3-epi-25(OH)D3, C3-epimer-25-hydroxycholecalciferol; 24,25(OH)2D3, 24,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol; 25(OH)D3, 25-hydroxycholecalciferol.

2

MMN and PE + MMN supplements include 10 µg/d cholecalciferol.

3

Observations were not available for all participants, n = 195 (FeFol), n = 201 (MMN), n = 184 (PE), n = 193 (PE + MMN) .

4

Observations were not available for all participants, n = 200 (FeFol), n = 204 (MMN), n = 184 (PE), n = 198 (PE + MMN).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Relations in early and late pregnancy between 25(OH)D3 concentration and (A) plasma 24,25(OH)2D3 (early pregnancy: n = 580, late pregnancy: n = 721); (B) plasma 3-epi-25(OH)D3 (early: n = 839, late: n = 791); (C) ratio of plasma 25(OH)D3 to 24,25(OH)2D3 (early: n = 580, late: n = 721); (D) ratio of plasma 25(OH)D3 to 3-epi-25(OH)D3 (early: n = 839, late: n = 791). 3-epi-25(OH)D3, C3-epimer-25-hydroxycholecalciferol; 24,25(OH)2D3, 24,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol; 25(OH)D3, 25-hydroxycholecalciferol.

Plasma concentrations of 3-epi-25(OH)D3 are reported in Table 4. In late pregnancy, the mean concentration and mean %3-epi-25(OH)D3 were higher than in early pregnancy across all supplementation groups (Table 4). The slopes of the significant positive linear relations between 25(OH)D3 and both 3-epi-25(OH)D3 concentration and their ratios were not different between early and late pregnancy (P > 0.4) (Figure 5B and D).

Discussion

We have characterized vitamin D status, response to supplementation, and vitamin D metabolite concentrations in a large cohort of pregnant women resident in rural Gambia. This study generates important findings in relation to vitamin D physiology in pregnancy. Firstly, we observed that during pregnancy in women with relatively constant vitamin D supply from cutaneous synthesis and generally good vitamin D status, 25(OH)D3 concentration increased by 11 nmol/L across pregnancy in the group not receiving supplemental vitamin D. Weeks of pregnancy was a strong predictor of vitamin D status and should therefore be considered in the interpretation of studies of vitamin D status in pregnancy. Secondly, in groups receiving 10 μg/d (400 IU/d) vitamin D3 within a micronutrient supplement, there was an additional ∼11 nmol/L increase in 25(OH)D3 concentration across pregnancy. Thirdly, in women not receiving vitamin D supplementation, 3-epi-25(OH)D3 concentration continued to increase across pregnancy suggesting an independent effect of pregnancy on production of 3-epi-25(OH)D3.

This is the largest study of vitamin D status in a pregnancy cohort in Africa. The Gambia lies relatively close to the equator at 13°N and therefore receives year round UVB-containing sunshine (15). Although we detected some seasonality in vitamin D status, which followed predictions of UVB availability, the effect was relatively modest and was equal to a difference of ∼6 nmol/L between the peak and nadir. To put this in context, it is comparable to the magnitude of diurnal variation we have observed in elderly people in The Gambia, the UK, and China (43), and is considerably lower than seasonal variation observed in pregnant women at higher latitudes (22, 44).

Vitamin D status was relatively high in this population with a mean of ∼70 nmol/L in early pregnancy; there was no vitamin D deficiency [25(OH)D concentration <30 nmol/L] (31, 32). This proportion is lower than some reports in pregnant women in Africa (11, 12) and probably reflects the relatively high UVB availability, skin exposure, and outdoor lifestyle in this rural Gambian population (38). The majority of circulating 25(OH)D is derived from exposure to sunlight, including in The Gambia, and the population has little or no access to fortified foods. Mean 25(OH)D concentration at baseline was similar to other cohorts from regions of similar latitude and supports the notion of a physiological norm described previously (45). Although no single population could be used to conclude what is normal, and other local environmental factors and related metabolic adaptations may need to be considered, this cohort provides a unique data set that could be considered as representative of the physiological norm for vitamin D metabolism in pregnancy.

Weeks of pregnancy was a strong positive predictor of 25(OH)D3 concentration in early pregnancy and indicates that this variable should be accurately determined and included in the analysis of studies of vitamin D status during pregnancy. The observed ∼11 nmol/L increase in 25(OH)D3 concentration across pregnancy is equivalent to the increase expected with an oral intake of ∼400 IU/d of vitamin D. Reported changes in vitamin D status with gestation are inconsistent, partly because of the large seasonal influence present in many studies, with suggestions of increases (20, 46), (47), decreases (23), and no change over pregnancy (17, 48). However, mean differences can disguise large interindividual variation (17). The physiological basis for the observed increase in 25(OH)D concentration may relate to an increase in DBP during pregnancy. The change we observed in 25(OH)D3 concentration up to ∼32 weeks of pregnancy closely mirrors that observed in other studies for DBP with an increase in early pregnancy followed by flattening between ∼28 and 32 weeks of pregnancy (23). This may imply that under circumstances where vitamin D supply from UVB exposure is relatively unrestricted, as in The Gambia, plasma 25(OH)D3 responds to an increase in DBP concentration. Such a response cannot occur where vitamin D supply is low or seasonal. This may indicate that during pregnancy, when DBP increases, the % free 25(OH)D is maintained, when permitted by a sufficiently high supply of vitamin D. Recent data from a study in pregnant US adolescents suggested a slight negative association between % free 25(OH)D and 25(OH)D concentration, although free 25(OH)D was highly correlated with 25(OH)D and did better predict associations with parathyroid hormone (49). In early pregnancy, we also observed a significant positive association between maternal age and 25(OH)D3 concentration. A similar, albeit smaller effect, was also observed in a UK pregnancy cohort measured in late pregnancy (50). In The Gambia, this association may be related to secular trends in style of dress or time spent outside engaged in farming, gardening, or other activities.

Vitamin D supplementation in this largely vitamin D-replete population had a positive effect on vitamin D status and reduced the proportion of women with both 25(OH)D3 concentration <50 nmol/L and the proportion with a decrease in vitamin D status between early and late pregnancy. The observed change in 25(OH)D3 concentration with daily doses of 10 μg/d was consistent with the dose-response observed in studies in other ethnic groups, including in pregnancy (2, 24, 51). An advantage of this study was that we were able to separate and demonstrate increases resulting from pregnancy per se from those associated with supplementation. A similar pregnancy-independent increase was also observed in a recent vitamin D supplementation trial in Ireland; however, seasonal changes in UVB supply were also influential (24), whereas our observations are largely independent of season. We demonstrate the positive effect on vitamin D status of a nutritionally relevant vitamin D supplement dose that is in line with amounts typically used in supplementation programs or that are obtainable through fortification. These data are relevant to the debate around the design of vitamin D supplementation trials and ethical concerns over the use of true placebo or active placebo (where the control group consists of a “low” dose supplementation) as the comparative arm, as commonly applied in randomized controlled trials of pharmacological agents (52, 53).

Dietary reference values for pregnant women are typically the same or based on an incremental increase over the recommendations for nonpregnant adults (9, 24). The reasons for this are attributable to the lack of data on pregnancy-related health outcomes, uncertainty over whether there is a metabolic increase in vitamin D requirements, and, until recently (24), a lack of data on the dose-response in pregnancy. The WHO recommendation is that sunlight exposure is the most important source of vitamin D and that the evidence does not support the use of supplemental vitamin D in pregnancy, with the exception of where there is confirmed vitamin D deficiency (33). Normal physiological changes in vitamin D status in pregnancy have been difficult to quantify partly because of the seasonal variation in vitamin D supply exhibited in Europe and the United States, where the majority of pregnancy studies have been performed. More recent studies have used seasonal correction to model 25(OH)D change in pregnancy, but data remain conflicting on the gestational-related change in 25(OH)D concentration (19, 22). In a study using stable isotope-labeled 25(OH)D, we have previously shown that 25(OH)D expenditure was not different between pregnant and nonpregnant women (21). Together with the data from the current study and based on the study of vitamin D status, this suggests that in this population, metabolically, pregnant women may not require more vitamin D than nonpregnant women and that metabolic adaptations or efficiencies are able to maintain vitamin D status where vitamin D supply is adequate and constant. Further confirmatory studies in other populations with for example, different vitamin D status, different DBP polymorphisms, or levels of adiposity, are required. However, this finding does not remove the need to ensure that all pregnant women are vitamin D sufficient. As discussed above, recent meta-analyses provide evidence for a beneficial effect of vitamin D on birth weight and size. Furthermore, recent data suggest that higher vitamin D intakes for pregnant women may be needed to ensure a plasma/serum 25(OH)D3 concentration in cord blood of >50 nmol/L (24).

Vitamin D supplementation in our study increased the proportion of women with 25(OH)D3 concentration >125 nmol/L, the lower end of the range (125–150 nmol/L) at which the Institute of Medicine reported as a cause for concern (while also recognizing the lack of data) (32). As reviewed elsewhere (2), maternal supplementation studies report few adverse effects (e.g., cases of hypercalcemia) (51, 54–56). However, these reports in pregnancy do not negate the concerns around higher vitamin D doses in relation to increased risks of falls and fractures nor with individuals within a population with medical disorders that may predispose to hypercalcemia (31), and the effects on fetal development are unknown.

Evidence suggests a negative association between response to vitamin D supplementation and measures of adiposity in both pregnant and nonpregnant women (50, 57). We did not find a relation between vitamin D status and BMI. This may be explained by the relatively low and narrow range of BMI observed in this population. Furthermore, as discussed below, assessment of adiposity during pregnancy is challenging. In our study, we found a negative association between late-pregnancy triceps skinfold thickness and 25(OH)D3 concentration, after adjustment for other factors. The relation with skinfold thickness may only have become apparent in late pregnancy after oral vitamin D because of differences in vitamin D transport. The tissue distribution of oral vitamin D that is initially transported by chylomicrons and lipoproteins may be different to that of cutaneously synthesized vitamin D transported by DBP (57). Population body composition may need to be considered when designing supplementation programs in different populations. Changes in body fat mass are more challenging to measure in pregnancy than in nonpregnant adults. However, the use of triceps skinfold thickness has been found to be a good estimate of fat mass in the absence of more invasive, advanced methods (58). We observed large interindividual variation in change of 25(OH)D3 concentration over pregnancy and in response to supplementation (2). The factors that influence this variation remain to be elucidated but may relate to differences in metabolism (because of genetic polymorphisms, other dietary or hormonal factors, or differences in lifestyle). We did not measure dietary calcium intake in this cohort. However, studies in this population indicate that calcium intakes are generally low (<400 mg/d) by international standards and do not change in pregnancy (21). Other studies in The Gambia (59) and in an Irish population (60) indicated that vitamin D use was not affected by low calcium intake.

In early pregnancy, vitamin D metabolites, 24,25(OH)2D3 and 3-epi-25(OH)D3, increased with rising 25(OH)D3 concentration. For 24,25(OH)2D3, the increase was followed by a flattening that closely mirrored that of 25(OH)D3. In contrast, 3-epi-25(OH)D3 concentration continued to rise, an observation that was reflected when its ratio was plotted against weeks of pregnancy. This is consistent with recent work that reported an increase in 3-epi-25(OH)D3 as pregnancy progressed (24, 61). As a percentage of 25(OH)D3 concentration, the 3-epi-25(OH)D3 results are similar to those estimated from the results from some studies (24) but higher than others (61). The source and biological significance of the relatively higher 3-epi-25(OH)D3 concentration in pregnancy, as well as in neonates (61), are unknown (62). It is suggested that production of 24,25(OH)2D3 may be suppressed at lower 25(OH)D3 concentrations (<∼25 nmol/L) (63), and Best et al. reported that 24,25(OH)2D3 concentration in pregnancy was related to both gestational stage and 25(OH)D3 concentration (25). Our results suggest that 24,25(OH)2D3 may be more related to 25(OH)D3 because the ratio across gestation did not change. The 24,25(OH)2D3:25(OH)D3 ratio is lower than reported in studies of nonpregnant adults (26), but consistent with a previous report of pregnant women. Lower relative 24,25(OH)2D may be related to a downregulation of the CY24A1 enzyme in pregnancy (24).

An advantage of this study was our ability to determine changes in vitamin D status across pregnancy in a relatively large number of individuals where the effect of season was small. In contrast to some studies, the use of an LC-MS/MS method that fully resolved and quantified 25(OH)D2, 25(OH)D3, 3-epi-25(OH)D3, and 24,25(OH)2D3 provides confidence over the change in vitamin D status over pregnancy as well as providing data on vitamin D metabolite changes over pregnancy.

This study was limited by factors related to the original study design. The latest sample collected during pregnancy was around 30 weeks of gestation, thus we are not able to infer changes in vitamin D status nearer delivery. We did not collect dietary data on vitamin D but vitamin D-containing foods or supplements are not considered to be significant sources of vitamin D in this tropical, rural, largely subsistence-farming community and thus the changes we observed over pregnancy can be interpreted in the context of a stable vitamin D supply from UVB-containing sunshine. We did not include variables related to income, education, or other social economic scores. However, other reports of this cohort report limited heterogeneity in these factors (64, 65). The limit of quantification of our LC-MS/MS method for 24,25(OH)2D3 was higher than in some other studies (25) and meant we were not able to include all participants in the 24,25(OH)2D3 models.

In conclusion, this study provides an accurate assessment of vitamin D status in a pregnancy cohort in rural Gambia and contributes to data on vitamin D status in low- and middle-income countries that are scarce and may be limited by sample size and the choice of vitamin D assay. Importantly, this study provides information on 25(OH)D and vitamin D metabolite response to pregnancy and vitamin D supplementation when vitamin D supply is stable from year-round high UVB availability. The generalizability of these findings to other populations requires further study in different groups. The potential relevance of nutritionally relevant doses (10 µg/d) and their impact in vitamin D supplementation trials and relevance to the development of vitamin D fortification and supplementation policies in pregnant women are highlighted.

Supplementary Material

nxz290_Supplemental_File

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the women of West Kiang who patiently participated in the study. We acknowledge the enthusiastic work of the ENID study team, especially the fieldworkers, village assistants, midwives, clinical staff, data office staff, and laboratory technicians who tirelessly collected the data and samples. The authors’ responsibilities were as follows—SEM: designed and conducted the ENID trial; KSJ: conceived, planned, and performed statistical analyses and wrote the manuscript; IS, AP, and SEM: provided intellectual input into the manuscript; SRM: performed vitamin D analysis; and all authors: read and approved the final manuscript.

Notes

Supported by UK Medical Research Council program codes U105960371 and U123261351 (KSJ and AP and sample analysis), MC-A760-5QX00 and the UK Department for International Development (DFID) under the MRC/DFID Concordat agreement (ENID trial) and MC_UP_1005/1 (SEM). KSJ and SRM are supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) (IS-BRC-1215-20014). The NIHR Cambridge BRC is a partnership between Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Cambridge, funded by NIHR. The views are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the UK Department of Health and Social Care.

Author disclosures: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Supplemental Methods and Supplemental Tables 1 and 2 are available from the “Supplementary data” link in the online posting of the article and from the same link in the online table of contents at https://academic.oup.com/jn.

Abbreviations used: DBP, vitamin D binding protein; FeFol, iron and folic acid supplement; LOQ, limit of quantification; MMN, multiple micronutrients; PE, protein energy; PE + MMN, protein energy supplement with multiple micronutrients; 1,25(OH)2D, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D; 3-epi-25(OH)D3, C3-epimer of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol; 24,25(OH)2D3, 24,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol; 25(OH)D3, 25-hydroxycholecalciferol.

References

  • 1. Kiely M, Hemmingway A, O'Callaghan KM. Vitamin D in pregnancy: current perspectives and future directions. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2017;9(6):145–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Roth DE, Leung M, Mesfin E, Qamar H, Watterworth J, Papp E. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy: state of the evidence from a systematic review of randomised trials. BMJ. 2017;359:j5237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Santamaria C, Bi WG, Leduc L, Tabatabaei N, Jantchou P, Luo ZC, Audibert F, Nuyt AM, Wei SQ. Prenatal vitamin D status and offspring's growth, adiposity and metabolic health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr. 2018;119(3):310–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Tous M, Villalobos M, Iglesias L, Fernandez-Barres S, Arija V. Vitamin D status during pregnancy and offspring outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2019; doi: 10.1038/s41430-018-0373-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bi WG, Nuyt AM, Weiler H, Leduc L, Santamaria C, Wei SQ. Association between vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy and offspring growth, morbidity, and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172(7):635–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Maugeri A, Barchitta M, Blanco I, Agodi A. Effects of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on birth size: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrients. 2019;11(2):E442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Corcoy R, Mendoza LC, Simmons D, Desoye G, Adelantado JM, Chico A, Devlieger R, van Assche A, Galjaard S, Timmerman D et al.. The DALI vitamin D randomized controlled trial for gestational diabetes mellitus prevention: no major benefit shown besides vitamin D sufficiency. Clin Nutr. 2019; doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Schoenmakers I, Pettifor JM, Pena-Rosas JP, Lamberg-Allardt C, Shaw N, Jones KS, Lips P, Glorieux FH, Bouillon R. Prevention and consequences of vitamin D deficiency in pregnant and lactating women and children: a symposium to prioritise vitamin D on the global agenda. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2016;164:156–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Roth DE, Abrams SA, Aloia J, Bergeron G, Bourassa MW, Brown KH, Calvo MS, Cashman KD, Combs G, De-Regil LM et al.. Global prevalence and disease burden of vitamin D deficiency: a roadmap for action in low- and middle-income countries. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1430(1):44–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Saraf R, Morton SM, Camargo CA Jr., Grant CC. Global summary of maternal and newborn vitamin D status—a systematic review. Matern Child Nutr. 2016;12(4):647–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Gbadegesin A, Sobande A, Adedeji O, Disu E, Korede O, Dosunmu A, Shakunle A. Maternal serum vitamin D levels and pregnancy outcomes: from Lagos, Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;37(1):25–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ayadi ID, Nouaili EB, Talbi E, Ghdemssi A, Rached C, Bahlous A, Gammoudi A, Hamouda SB, Bouguerra B, Bouzid K et al.. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in mothers and their newborns in a Tunisian population. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;133(2):192–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Hilger J, Friedel A, Herr R, Rausch T, Roos F, Wahl DA, Pierroz DD, Weber P, Hoffmann K. A systematic review of vitamin D status in populations worldwide. Br J Nutr. 2014;111(1):23–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Palacios C, Gonzalez L.. Is vitamin D deficiency a major global public health problem?. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2014;144:(Pt A):138–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Cashman KD, Sheehy T, O'Neill CM. Is vitamin D deficiency a public health concern for low middle income countries? A systematic literature review. Eur J Nutr. 2018;58(1):433–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. O'Callaghan KM, Kiely ME.. Ethnic disparities in the dietary requirement for vitamin D during pregnancy: considerations for nutrition policy and research. Proc Nutr Soc. 2018;77(2):164–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Gustafsson MK, Romundstad PR, Stafne SN, Helvik AS, Stunes AK, Morkved S, Salvesen KA, Thorsby PM, Syversen U. Alterations in the vitamin D endocrine system during pregnancy: a longitudinal study of 855 healthy Norwegian women. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0195041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Wheeler BJ, Taylor BJ, de Lange M, Harper MJ, Jones S, Mekhail A, Houghton LA. A longitudinal study of 25-hydroxy vitamin D and parathyroid hormone status throughout pregnancy and exclusive lactation in New Zealand mothers and their infants at 45° S. Nutrients. 2018;10(1):86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Barebring L, Schoenmakers I, Glantz A, Hulthen L, Jagner A, Ellis J, Barebring M, Bullarbo M, Augustin H. Vitamin D status during pregnancy in a multi-ethnic population-representative Swedish cohort. Nutrients. 2016;8(10):E655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Cross NA, Hillman LS, Allen SH, Krause GF, Vieira NE. Calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism during pregnancy, lactation, and postweaning: a longitudinal study. Am J Clin Nutr. 1995;61(3):514–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Jones KS, Assar S, Prentice A, Schoenmakers I. Vitamin D expenditure is not altered in pregnancy and lactation despite changes in vitamin D metabolite concentrations. Sci Rep. 2016;6:26795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Moon RJ, Crozier SR, Dennison EM, Davies JH, Robinson SM, Inskip HM, Godfrey KM, Cooper C, Harvey NC. Tracking of 25-hydroxyvitamin D status during pregnancy: the importance of vitamin D supplementation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102(5):1081–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Zhang JY, Lucey AJ, Horgan R, Kenny LC, Kiely M. Impact of pregnancy on vitamin D status: a longitudinal study. Br J Nutr. 2014;112(7):1081–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. O'Callaghan KM, Hennessy A, Hull GL, Healy K, Ritz C, Kenny LC, Cashman KD, Kiely ME. Estimation of the maternal vitamin D intake that maintains circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D in late gestation at a concentration sufficient to keep umbilical cord sera ≥25–30 nmol/l: a dose-response, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial in pregnant women at northern latitude. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;108(1):77–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Best CM, Pressman EK, Queenan RA, Cooper E, Vermeylen F, O'Brien KO. Gestational age and maternal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration interact to affect the 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D concentration in pregnant adolescents. J Nutr. 2018;148(6):868–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Cashman KD, Hayes A, Galvin K, Merkel J, Jones G, Kaufmann M, Hoofnagle AN, Carter GD, Durazo-Arvizu RA, Sempos CT. Significance of serum 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in the assessment of vitamin D status: a double-edged sword?. Clin Chem. 2015;61(4):636–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Tang JCY, Nicholls H, Piec I, Washbourne CJ, Dutton JJ, Jackson S, Greeves J, Fraser WD. Reference intervals for serum 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and the ratio with 25-hydroxyvitamin D established using a newly developed LC-MS/MS method. J Nutr Biochem. 2017;46:21–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Novakovic B, Sibson M, Ng HK, Manuelpillai U, Rakyan V, Down T, Beck S, Fournier T, Evain-Brion D, Dimitriadis E et al.. Placenta-specific methylation of the vitamin D 24-hydroxylase gene: implications for feedback autoregulation of active vitamin D levels at the fetomaternal interface. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(22):14838–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Sempos CT, Heijboer AC, Bikle DD, Bollerslev J, Bouillon R, Brannon PM, DeLuca HF, Jones G, Munns CF, Bilezikian JP et al.. Vitamin D assays and the definition of hypovitaminosis D: results from the First International Conference on Controversies in Vitamin D. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;84(10):2194–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Heijboer AC, Blankenstein MA, Kema IP, Buijs MM. Accuracy of 6 routine 25-hydroxyvitamin D assays: influence of vitamin D binding protein concentration. Clin Chem. 2012;58(3):543–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition. Vitamin D and health 2016. [Internet]. [Last accessed 2019 Nov 28]. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/537616/SACN_Vitamin_D_and_Health_report.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for calcium and vitamin D. Washington (DC: ): The National Academies Press; 2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. World Health Organization. Recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: WHO;2016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Moore SE, Fulford AJ, Darboe MK, Jobarteh ML, Jarjou LM, Prentice AM. A randomized trial to investigate the effects of pre-natal and infant nutritional supplementation on infant immune development in rural Gambia: the ENID trial: Early Nutrition and Immune Development. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Moore SE, Fulford AJC, Sosseh F, Nshe P, Darboe MK, Prentice AM. Thymic size is increased by infancy, but not pregnancy, nutritional supplementation in rural Gambian children: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Zengin A, Fulford AJ, Sawo Y, Jarjou LM, Schoenmakers I, Goldberg G, Prentice A, Ward KA. The Gambian Bone and Muscle Ageing Study: baseline data from a prospective observational African sub-Saharan study. Front Endocrinol. 2017;8:219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Lowe M, Chen D-R, Huang S-L. Social and cultural factors affecting maternal health in rural Gambia: an exploratory qualitative study. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0163653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Hennig BJ, Unger SA, Dondeh BL, Hassan J, Hawkesworth S, Jarjou L, Jones KS, Moore SE, Nabwera HM, Ngum M et al.. Cohort profile: the Kiang West Longitudinal Population Study (KWLPS)—a platform for integrated research and health care provision in rural Gambia. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(2):e13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Johnson W, Darboe MK, Sosseh F, Nshe P, Prentice AM, Moore SE. Association of prenatal lipid-based nutritional supplement with fetal growth in rural Gambia. Matern Child Health. 2017;13(2):e12367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Schleicher RL, Encisco SE, Chaudhary-Webb M, Paliakov E, McCoy LF, Pfeiffer CM. Isotope dilution ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for simultaneous measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D2, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 3-epi-25-hydroxyvitamin D3 in human serum. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412(17–18):1594–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Hornung RW, Reed LD.. Estimation of average concentration in the presence of nondetectable values. App Occup Environ Hyg. 1990;5(1):46–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Fulford AJ. The coefficient of cyclic variation: a novel statistic to measure the magnitude of cyclic variation. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2014;11:15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Jones KS, Redmond J, Fulford AJ, Jarjou L, Zhou B, Prentice A, Schoenmakers I. Diurnal rhythms of vitamin D binding protein and total and free vitamin D metabolites. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2017;172:130–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Krieger JP, Cabaset S, Canonica C, Christoffel L, Richard A, Schroder T, von Wattenwyl BL, Rohrmann S, Lotscher KQ. Prevalence and determinants of vitamin D deficiency in the third trimester of pregnancy: a multicentre study in Switzerland. Br J Nutr. 2018;119(3):299–309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Durazo-Arvizu RA, Camacho P, Bovet P, Forrester T, Lambert EV, Plange-Rhule J, Hoofnagle AN, Aloia J, Tayo B, Dugas LR et al.. 25-hydroxyvitamin D in African-origin populations at varying latitudes challenges the construct of a physiologic norm. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100(3):908–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Lundqvist A, Sandstrom H, Stenlund H, Johansson I, Hultdin J. Vitamin D status during pregnancy: a longitudinal study in Swedish women from early pregnancy to seven months postpartum. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0150385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Milman N, Hvas AM, Bergholt T. Vitamin D status during normal pregnancy and postpartum. A longitudinal study in 141 Danish women. J Perinat Med. 2011;40(1):57–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Papapetrou PD. The interrelationships of serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in pregnancy at term: a meta-analysis. Hormones. 2010;9(2):136–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Best CM, Pressman EK, Queenan RA, Cooper E, O'Brien KO. Longitudinal changes in serum vitamin D binding protein and free 25-hydroxyvitamin D in a multiracial cohort of pregnant adolescents. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2018;186:79–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Moon RJ, Harvey NC, Cooper C, D'Angelo S, Crozier SR, Inskip HM, Schoenmakers I, Prentice A, Arden NK, Bishop NJ et al.. Determinants of the maternal 25-hydroxyvitamin D response to vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(12):5012–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Litonjua AA, Carey VJ, Laranjo N, Harshfield BJ, McElrath TF, O'Connor GT, Sandel M, Iverson RE Jr., Lee-Paritz A, Strunk RC et al.. Effect of prenatal supplementation with vitamin D on asthma or recurrent wheezing in offspring by age 3 years: the VDAART randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315(4):362–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Frame LA, Fischer JP, Geller G, Cheskin LJ. Use of placebo in supplementation studies—vitamin D research illustrates an ethical quandary. Nutrients. 2018;10(3):347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Scragg R. Emerging evidence of thresholds for beneficial effects from vitamin D supplementation. Nutrients. 2018;10(5):561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Dawodu A, Saadi HF, Bekdache G, Javed Y, Altaye M, Hollis BW. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy in a population with endemic vitamin D deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(6):2337–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Hollis BW, Johnson D, Hulsey TC, Ebeling M, Wagner CL. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy: double-blind, randomized clinical trial of safety and effectiveness. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(10):2341–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Roth DE, Al Mahmud A, Raqib R, Akhtar E, Perumal N, Pezzack B, Baqui AH. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of high-dose prenatal third-trimester vitamin D3 supplementation in Bangladesh: the AViDD trial. Nutr J. 2013;12:47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Schoenmakers I, Jones KS.. Chapter 37 - Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics. In: Feldman D.ed. Vitamin D(fourth edition): Cambridge (MA): Academic Press; 2018:635–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Marshall NE, Murphy EJ, King JC, Haas EK, Lim JY, Wiedrick J, Thornburg KL, Purnell JQ. Comparison of multiple methods to measure maternal fat mass in late gestation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103(4):1055–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Jones KS, Assar S, Vanderschueren D, Bouillon R, Prentice A, Schoenmakers I. Predictors of 25(OH)D half-life and plasma 25(OH)D concentration in The Gambia and the UK. Osteoporos Int. 2015;26(3):1137–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Cashman KD, Hayes A, O'Donovan SM, Zhang JY, Kinsella M, Galvin K, Kiely M, Seamans KM. Dietary calcium does not interact with vitamin D(3) in terms of determining the response and catabolism of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D during winter in older adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99(6):1414–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Mydtskov ND, Lykkedegn S, Fruekilde PBN, Nielsen J, Barington T, Christesen HT. S-25-hydroxyvitamin D and C3-epimers in pregnancy and infancy: an Odense child cohort study. Clin Biochem. 2017;50(18):988–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Karras SN, Kotsa K, Angeloudi E, Zebekakis P, Naughton DP. The road not so travelled: should measurement of vitamin D epimers during pregnancy affect our clinical decisions?. Nutrients. 2017;9(2):90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Kaufmann M, Gallagher JC, Peacock M, Schlingmann KP, Konrad M, DeLuca HF, Sigueiro R, Lopez B, Mourino A, Maestro M et al.. Clinical utility of simultaneous quantitation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D by LC-MS/MS involving derivatization with DMEQ-TAD. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(7):2567–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Watson S, Moore SE, Darboe MK, Chen G, Tu YK, Huang YT, Eriksen KG, Bernstein RM, Prentice AM, Wild CP et al.. Impaired growth in rural Gambian infants exposed to aflatoxin: a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Eriksen KG, Johnson W, Sonko B, Prentice AM, Darboe MK, Moore SE. Following the World Health Organization's recommendation of exclusive breastfeeding to 6 months of age does not impact the growth of rural Gambian infants. J Nutr. 2017;147(2):248–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

nxz290_Supplemental_File

Articles from The Journal of Nutrition are provided here courtesy of American Society for Nutrition

RESOURCES