Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 5.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2019 May 10;25(13):3750–3752. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0932

Overcoming the blood-brain barrier with an implantable ultrasound device

Adam M Sonabend 1, Roger Stupp 1
PMCID: PMC7057332  NIHMSID: NIHMS1041812  PMID: 31076548

Summary

Ultrasound-based blood-brain-barrier disruption enhances drug delivery to the brain. To bypass the thick human skull, an ultrasound that is implanted on a cranial window was developed, proven safe and feasible in a first-in-human trial. Next development steps aim for larger field of disruption, quantification of increase in drug level, use of various chemotherapy agents and ultimately a pivotal trial demonstrating improved outcome.


In this issue of CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, Idbaih, Carpentier and colleagues report on their phase 1 trial of opening the blood-brain barrier with the use of an implantable ultrasound [1]. Infiltrative gliomas and glioblastoma in particular, remain an incurable disease. As numerous novel therapeutic approaches have failed in controlled clinical trials, temozolomide remains the first-line drug in the treatment of these tumors, which is in part explained by its good penetration across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Indeed, the BBB is a major impediment to drug therapy of brain tumors, and thus, the technology evaluated on this trial overcomes such limitation.

Pulsed-ultrasound, when used in combination with intravenous injection of microbubbles, transiently disrupts the BBB. This technology has been around for some time, and shown to enhance delivery of anti-tumoral agents to the brain in a multitude of pre-clinical models. However, translation of this approach into patients requires the ultrasonic waves to either penetrate or bypass the relatively thick human skull. Our French colleagues take it to a new level by implanting the ultrasound emitter into a window on the patients’ skull, thus overcoming the intrinsic resistance of the skull when using conventional external systems. This system has allowed easy and repeat opening of the BBB. The ultrasound emitter activates microbubbles that are simultaneously administered intravenously. By this means, the BBB is mechanically disrupted, and diffusion of larger and polar molecules into the brain becomes feasible. The BBB opening is reversible and lasts for several hours after the sonication.

Here Idbaih and colleagues have successfully treated 19 patients with BBB disruption using the implantable ultrasound emitter, and concomitant administration of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent carboplatin [1, 2]. They visualize the opening of the blood brain barrier as temporary extravasation of gadolinium on magnetic resonance imaging performed immediately after each sonication. They report “successful” BBB opening in 52 of 65 sonication sessions. Overall, treatment-emergent toxicity was mild-moderate and related to the known toxicity of the chemotherapy agent used. No hemorrhage or severe neurological symptoms were observed. Two occurrences of transient grade IV edema were attributed to the ultrasound and BBB opening, one event occurring within hours of sonication, the other only on day 15 and possibly related to tumor progression.

Idbaih and colleagues chose carboplatin as the chemotherapy agent for this first in human trial. The small number of patients does not allow for any conclusions regarding treatment efficacy, nevertheless, the trend for improved patient outcome in patients with successful opening of the BBB is encouraging. The delivery of other and potentially more effective agents will certainly have to be investigated in future trials.

Ultrasound based BBB-disruption is an emergent technology actively being investigated in gliomas in at least 5 separate clinical trials currently registered on clinicaltrials.gov (cf table 1). This approach to enhancing drug delivery could have an important impact on brain tumor therapy by making it possible to achieve efficacious delivery of potent drugs that otherwise would not penetrate across the BBB.

Table:

Ongoing early phase clinical trials investigating ultrasound for BBB opening

Device/Intervention Disease/Population phase No pts Location Status NCT#
Implantable US “Sonocloud-1 GBM rec 1 21 Paris, France completed 02253212
Implantable US “Sonocloud-9 GBM rec 1 / 2 30 International completed 03744026
Transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound “Exablate GBM rec 1 10 Toronto, Canada completed 02343991
Transcranial focused ultrasound “Navi GBM rec 1 9 Taoyuan, Taiwan recruiting 03626896
Transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound “Exablate Breast camets 1 10 Toronto, Canada planned 03714243
Transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound “Exablate High-grade glioma rec 1 20 Baltimore, USA recruiting 03551249

GBM; glioblastoma, mets; brain metastases, NCT#; registration number in clinicaltrials.gov Rec; recurrent

The concept of implantable ultrasound emitters is intriguing. Given that the ultrasonic waves do not penetrate across the bone, this system avoids variability of acoustic transmission secondary to irregularities in skull thickness, or metal plates that are commonly used to fixate the bone after a craniotomy in these patients. Implantable ultrasound devices can generate reproducible sound waves targeted to the brain tissue infiltrated by tumor cells. Therefore, this technology does not require complex MRI guidance or feedback systems to modulate the high-energy pulses that are required for BBB-disruption by transcranial ultrasound technologies.(35) Thus with this approach, BBB disruption promises to be simple and accessible, allowing for repetitive treatments in an outpatient setting. Potent larger molecules may be delivered to infiltrating brain tumor cells that are normally protected by the BBB. In this paper the principle feasibility of this technology has been nicely demonstrated. Yet, between the proof-of-principle and the broad adaptation of this emergent technology, there will be several challenges to be overcome (Figure). Quantification of drug levels in the tumor and in the adjacent infiltrated human brain tissue would be informative. Whereas pre-clinical studies demonstrate effective opening of the BBB, there are several species differences that limit the extrapolation and complicate implementation of these approaches in humans. The acoustic pressures and the dosing regimens used in patients cannot be directly tested in small animals. Another requirement is expanding the volume of BBB disruption. For the current study, only one single ultrasound emitter was implanted, thus providing BBB disruption to only a small field of sonication. However, as almost all primary brain tumors are a diffusely infiltrating diseases with tumor cells migrating well beyond the initial visible tumor margin, larger volume BBB disruption will be important in order to achieve a clinical impact. A second-generation implantable device with 9 ultrasound emitters is currently undergoing clinical testing by the same group of investigators. And lastly, before broad adoption of ultrasound-based BBB disruption for drug delivery in general, the clinical value will need to be demonstrated for several therapeutic agents. The choice of carboplatin, an agent that is occasionally used for salvage therapy in recurrent glioma has been used for this first-in-human clinical trial, largely because the agent is established with a well-known toxicity profile. The experience with carboplatin may be extrapolated to other potentially more active antitumor agents. It will be important to establish streamlined regulatory pathways that allow the concomitant use of various chemotherapy agents and drugs without repeating every clinical experiment. Sonication parameters can be obtained and extrapolated from prior trials. For many established and novel drugs with promising preclinical activity the limited penetration and distribution beyond the BBB has been an important cause of failure. Ultrasound-based opening of the BBB provides an opportunity for adequate regional drug delivery with limited local or systemic toxicity. And lastly, it remains to be evaluated whether such a technology can also enhance drug delivery for other neurological diseases. We commend Idbaih, Carpentier and collaborators for this innovative technology which opens both the BBB, as well as exciting therapeutic possibilities for gliomas, a disease beyond reach for must drugs.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Next steps in development of implantable ultrasound. Boxes represent implantable ultrasound device.

Footnotes

The authors declare no relevant conflict of interest

References

  • 1.Idbaih A, Canney M, Belin L, Desseaux C, Vignot A, Bouchoux G, et al. Safety and Feasibility of Repeated and Transient Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption by Pulsed Ultrasound in Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 2019. doi 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Carpentier A, Canney M, Vignot A, Reina V, Beccaria K, Horodyckid C, et al. Clinical trial of blood-brain barrier disruption by pulsed ultrasound. Sci Transl Med 2016;8(343):343re2 doi 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf6086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N, Raymond S, Jolesz FA, Hynynen K. MRI-guided targeted blood-brain barrier disruption with focused ultrasound: histological findings in rabbits. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005;31(11):1527–37 doi 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.O’Reilly MA, Waspe AC, Chopra R, Hynynen K. MRI-guided disruption of the blood-brain barrier using transcranial focused ultrasound in a rat model. J Vis Exp 2012(61) doi 10.3791/3555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Treat LH, McDannold N, Zhang Y, Vykhodtseva N, Hynynen K. Improved anti-tumor effect of liposomal doxorubicin after targeted blood-brain barrier disruption by MRI-guided focused ultrasound in rat glioma. Ultrasound Med Biol 2012;38(10):1716–25 doi 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.04.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES