Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 6.
Published in final edited form as: Transplantation. 2019 Apr;103(4):668–678. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002568

TABLE 1.

Summary of probiotic clinical trials in liver transplant recipients

Probiotic Dose, CFU Duration ACR (risk ratio) Infection (risk ratio) LOS (mean difference), days
Rayes et al72 Lactobacillus plantarum 299 1 × 109 Day 1 to day 14 0.69 (0.37:1.29) 0.38 (0.13:1.05) −1.00 (−2.26 to 0.26)
Rayes et al73 Pediacoccus pentosaceus 5–33:3
Leuconostoc mesenteroides 77:1
Lactobacillus paracasei species paracasei F19
Lactobacillus plantarum 2362
10 × 109 Day 0 to day 14 0.86 (0.32:2.28) 0.06 (0.01:0.44) −1.40 (−2.09 to −0.71)
Eguchi et al75 Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota
Bifidobacterium breve strain Yakult
20 mg
15 mg
Day −2 to day 14 0.17 (0.02:1.29)
Zhang et al74 Lactobacillus acidophilus (LA-14)
Lactobacillus plantarum (LP-115)
Bifidobacterium lactis (BL-04)
Lactobacillus casei (LC-11)
Lactobacillus rhamnosus (LR-32)
Lactobacillus brevis (LBr-35)
27 × 109 Day 1 to day 7+ 0.67 (0.12:3.65) 0.29 (0.09:0.96) −2.00 (−3.44 to −0.56)
Grat et al76 Lactococcus lactis PB411
Lactobacillus casei PB121
Lactobacillus acidophilus PB111
Bifidobacterium bifidum PB211
3 × 109 Day of listing to day 0 (16.7% <2 weeks) 0.18 (0.02:1.37)
Cumulative data 0.73 (0.44:1.22) 0.20 (0.11:0.38) −1.41 (−1.97 to −0.86)

The findings of interventional probiotic clinical trials in liver transplant recipients are summarized. All patients received enteral nutrition with fiber supplementation in addition to the listed probiotics with the exception of Eguchi et al75 (enteral nutrition alone) and Grat et al76 (no additional nutritional supplementation).

ACR, acute cellular rejection; CFU, colony-forming units; LOS, length of stay.