Abstract
Infections caused by Rhodotorula spp. are increasing worldwide. This study identified, through the light of the new taxonomic advances on the subphylum Pucciniomycotina, 16 isolates from blood cultures and compared their antifungal susceptibility on microdilution and gradient diffusion methods. Internal transcriber spacer sequencing identified Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (n = 12), Rhodotorula toruloides (n = 2), Rhodotorula dairenensis (n = 1), and Cystobasidium minutum (n = 1). Amphotericin B was the most effective drug. A good essential agreement was observed on MIC values of amphotericin B and voriconazole determined by the two methods. Therefore, the gradient method is useful for susceptibility tests of R. mucilaginosa against these drugs.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1007/s42770-019-00191-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: Opportunistic fungi, Rhodotorula, Bloodstream infections, ITS sequencing, Antifungal susceptibility
Fungal infections by yeasts belonging to the genus Rhodotorula are increasingly reported in the scientific literature. Fungemia accounts for more than half of Rhodotorula infections, especially in patients with malignancy, and the mortality rate among Rhodotorula-infected patients can reach 12% [1]. This genus has been reported as the third most frequent yeast isolated from blood cultures in some centers [2].
For several years, the genus Rhodotorula comprised ubiquitous basidiomycetous yeasts producing large amounts of carotenoid pigments, which results in the production of red to pink yeast colonies during in vitro growth [3]. However, molecular studies have shown that this genus was polyphyletic and, to fulfill the “one fungus = one name” concept, a multilocus sequence typing was used to recognize monophyletic clades within the subphylum Pucciniomycotina, which resulted in the description of new genera, for example, Rhodosporidiobolus, and in the emended of others, for example, Rhodotorula and Cystobasidium [4, 5].
Amphotericin B is the main drug used to treat Rhodotorula infections, with good rates of cure. Other antifungal drugs used include fluconazole, 5-flucytosine, itraconazole, voriconazole, and ketoconazole [1]. However, there are no clinical guidelines for the management of the infections caused by Rhodotorula or by its sibling genera. The paucity of literature data is indeed a challenge to the development of clinical guidelines to treat Pucciniomycotina red yeast infections. The information about the response of these fungi to the antifungal drugs is based on reports of in vitro antifungal susceptibility tests performed with clinical strains. However, strains included in some studies are not properly identified [6, 7] or the susceptibility is determined with methods other than the gold standard microdilution technique [8, 9].
The aim of this study was to identify, through the light of the new taxonomic advances on the subphylum Pucciniomycotina, red yeasts isolated from blood cultures of patients from a tertiary hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Also, their in vitro antifungal susceptibility was evaluated using the gold standard microdilution and the gradient diffusion methods.
Sixteen strains deposited at the fungal culture collection at the Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fiocruz, Brazil, were studied. They were isolated from the bloodstream of 14 patients admitted to the Instituto Nacional de Cancer in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, between 2000 and 2012. Rhodotorula sp. identification was performed using standard procedures, such as the production of red to pink yeast colonies on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (Difco, Becton, Dickinson and Company, USA) and biochemical analysis using the API 20C AUX or the Vitek 2 system (bioMérrieux, France).
Genomic DNA was extracted from strains grown on Sabouraud Dextrose agar for 5 days at 30 °C and used as a template for the amplification of the internal transcriber spacer (ITS) region using primers ITS1 and ITS4 and PCR conditions described for the fungal barcoding protocol [10]. For antifungal susceptibility, amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and caspofungin (Sigma Chemical Corporation, St. Louis, MO, USA) were prepared and tested according to the CLSI M27-A3 document [11]. Etest® strips (bioMérieux, France) containing the abovementioned antifungal drugs were used to test the in vitro susceptibility with the gradient diffusion method, according to the manufacturer recommendations. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of both methods were determined after 72 h of incubation at 35 °C [12].
Descriptive statistical analyses were performed with the GraphPad Prism 7.0 software, to obtain MIC ranges, MIC50 and MIC90 values, and geometric means. The MIC50 and MIC90 values correspond to the lowest concentration of the antifungal drug able to inhibit the growth of 50% and 90% of all fungal strains tested, respectively. MICs obtained for each strain under different methodologies were compared using the essential agreement criterion [13]; that is, agreements were recorded when discrepancies between the MIC values determined by the different methods were within two drug dilutions (e.g., 0.5 μg/mL and 2.0 μg/mL).
ITS sequencing identified all strains: 12 as Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, two as Rhodotorula toruloides, one as Cystobasidium minutum, and one as Rhodotorula dairenensis. The sequences presented 99% to 100% homology with sequences from the CBS database (Table S1).
The in vitro antifungal susceptibilities of the strains as determined by the two studied methods are summarized in Table 1, for amphotericin B, and Table 2, for azoles. In general, fluconazole (MIC ≥ 64 μg/mL) and caspofungin (MIC ≥ 4 μg/mL) were unable to inhibit the growth of all species and amphotericin B was the most effective antifungal drug. Essential agreement between MIC values obtained by broth microdilution and gradient diffusion was excellent (100%) for amphotericin B and voriconazole, but essential agreement percentages obtained by Etest® were lower for itraconazole and posaconazole.
Table 1.
Species (number of isolates) | Method | Amphotericin B (μg/ml) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIC range | MIC50/MIC90 | GM | %EA | ||
Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (12) | CLSI | 0.5-1 | 0.5/1 | 0.53 | |
Etest | 0.12-0.75 | 0.5/0.75 | 0.34 | 100 | |
Rhodotorula dairenensis (1) | CLSI | 2 | - | - | |
Etest | 0.75 | - | - | 100 | |
Rhodotorula toruloides (2) | CLSI | 0.5 | - | 0.5 | |
Etest | 0.25-0.5 | - | 0.35 | 100 | |
Cystobasidium minutum (1) | CLSI | 0.5 | - | - | |
Etest | 0.25 | - | - | 100 |
MIC50/MIC90 minimal inhibitory concentration of the antifungal able to inhibit the growth of 50 and 90% of fungal isolates, respectively, GM geometric mean of the minimal inhibitory concentrations values, EA essential agreement
Table 2.
Species (number of isolates) | Method | Voriconazole (μg/ml) | Itraconazole (μg/ml) | Posaconazole (μg/ml) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIC range | MIC50/MIC90 | GM | %EA | MIC range | MIC50/MIC90 | GM | %EA | MIC range | MIC50/MIC90 | GM | %EA | ||
Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (12) | CLSI | 2-8 | 4/8 | 3.77 | 2-8 | 4/8 | 3.36 | 2-8 | 4/8 | 5.04 | |||
Etest | 0.5-32 | 2/16 | 1.97 | 100 | 0.75->32 | 8/32 | 7.65 | 61.5 | 0.5->32 | 16/32 | 8.25 | 76.9 | |
Rhodotorula dairenensis (1) | CLSI | 1 | - | - | 0.12 | - | - | 2 | - | - | |||
Etest | 2 | - | - | 100 | 0.75 | - | - | 0 | 0.75 | - | - | 100 | |
Rhodotorula toruloides (2) | CLSI | 0.25-2 | - | 0.70 | 0.12-2 | - | 0.49 | 0.25-0.5 | - | 0.35 | |||
Etest | 1.5 | - | 1.5 | 100 | 0.125-3 | - | 0.61 | 100 | 0.125->32 | - | 2 | 50 | |
Cystobasidium minutum (1) | CLSI | 2 | - | - | 0.25 | - | - | 0.5 | - | - | |||
Etest | 1.5 | - | - | 100 | 1.5 | - | - | 100 | >32 | - | - | 0 |
MIC50/MIC90 minimal inhibitory concentration of the antifungal able to inhibit the growth of 50 and 90% of fungal isolates, respectively, GM geometric mean of the minimal inhibitory concentrations values, EA essential agreement
The main limitation for comparative studies on infections caused by Pucciniomycotina yeasts is their low incidence. As a result, there is a paucity of knowledge on species distribution, epidemiology, antifungal susceptibility, and clinical aspects of these infections. To the best of our knowledge, this is the second study describing antifungal susceptibility data obtained with the gold standard method in a collection of clinical Pucciniomycotina red yeasts identified by means of ITS sequencing [12]. However, the lack of access to clinical data limited a clinical-microbiological correlation.
As described before, the ITS sequencing was a reliable methodology to identify R. mucilaginosa, R. dairenensis, and C. minutum. It appears that R. mucilaginosa is the most prevalent species among the Pucciniomycotina red yeasts that causes human infections [1, 12, 14]. Infections caused by R. dairenensis and C. minutum, formerly Rhodotorula minuta, were already described by some authors [1, 12], always with a low frequency, as observed in this study. R. toruloides is a yeast largely used by industries due to its potential to produce significant amounts of several compounds of interest, such as carotenoids and lipids [15]. In the present study, this species is presented, for the first time, as the agent of bloodstream infections. This species is probably misdiagnosed by clinical laboratories due to the limitations of the routine identification systems [16] and its real frequency in human infections remains to be elucidated.
The results of this study corroborate the inefficacy of fluconazole and caspofungin against clinical Pucciniomycotina red yeasts [12], including R. toruloides to the list of resistant species to these drugs. Amphotericin B is the most used antifungal drug used to treat infected patients [1, 17], and the in vitro results support its clinical use.
The gold standard microdilution method is laborious and its use by routine clinical laboratories is limited. Gradient diffusion methods are usually used as its substitute due to the easiness in performance and in the determination of MIC values. The usefulness of gradient diffusion methods is already described for Candida and Cryptococcus species [18, 19], but for other fungi, the gradient diffusion MICs do not correlate with the gold standard method [20]. This study has shown that Etest® can be a fast and reliable methodology for the MIC values’ determination of amphotericin B and voriconazole against R. mucilaginosa and thus, it could be applied to a diagnosis laboratory routine as well as to the epidemiological resistance surveillance. Due to the low strain number of other species, further studies are needed to confirm if good essential agreement between these two methods also occurs with Pucciniomycotina yeasts rather than R. mucilaginosa.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgments
We are grateful for the contribution of the Evandro Chagas National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, and to the students who helped in the mycological analyses.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Ioannou P, Vamvoukaki R, Samonis G. Rhodotorula species infections in humans: a systematic review. Mycoses. 2019;62:90–100. doi: 10.1111/myc.12856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.De Almeida GMD, Costa SF, Melhem M, Motta AL, Szeszs MW, Miyashita F, Pierrotti LC, Rossi F, Burattini MN. Rhodotorula spp. isolated from blood cultures: clinical and microbiological aspects. Med Mycol. 2008;46:547–556. doi: 10.1080/13693780801972490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mannazzu I, Landolfo S, Lopes da Silva T, Buzzini P. Red yeasts and carotenoid production: outlining a future for non-conventional yeasts of biotechnological interest. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;31:1665–1673. doi: 10.1007/s11274-015-1927-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wang Q-M, Yurkov AM, Göker M, Lumbsch HT, Leavitt SD, Groenewald M, Theelen B, Liu X-Z, Boekhout T, Bai F-Y. Phylogenetic classification of yeasts and related taxa within Pucciniomycotina. Stud Mycol. 2015;81:149–189. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2015.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wang Q-M, Groenewald M, Takashima M, Theelen B, Han P-J, Liu X-Z, Boekhout T, Bai F-Y. Phylogeny of yeasts and related filamentous fungi within Pucciniomycotina determined from multigene sequence analyses. Stud Mycol. 2015;81:27–53. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2015.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Moges B, Bitew A, Shewaamare A. Spectrum and the in vitro antifungal susceptibility pattern of yeast isolates in ethiopian HIV patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis. Int J Microbiol. 2016;2016:3037817. doi: 10.1155/2016/3037817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mazari W, Boucherit-Otmani Z, El Haci IA, Ilahi A, Boucherit K. Risk assessment for the spread of Candida sp. in dental chair unit waterlines using molecular techniques. Int Dent J. 2018;68:386–392. doi: 10.1111/idj.12401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Gibbs DL, Newell VA, Bijie H, Dzierzanowska D, Klimko NN, Letscher-Bru V, Lisalova M, Muehlethaler K, Rennison C, Zaidi M, Global Antifungal Surveillance Group Results from the ARTEMIS DISK Global Antifungal Surveillance Study, 1997 to 2007: 10.5-year analysis of susceptibilities of noncandidal yeast species to fluconazole and voriconazole determined by CLSI standardized disk diffusion testing. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:117–123. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01747-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Liu XP, Fan SR, Peng YT, Zhang HP. Species distribution and susceptibility of Candida isolates from patient with vulvovaginal candidiasis in Southern China from 2003 to 2012. J Mycol Med. 2014;24:106–111. doi: 10.1016/j.mycmed.2014.01.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Irinyi L, Serena C, Garcia-Hermoso D, Arabatzis M, Desnos-Ollivier M, Vu D, Cardinali G, Arthur I, Normand A-C, Giraldo A, da Cunha KC, Sandoval-Denis M, Hendrickx M, Nishikaku AS, de Azevedo Melo AS, Merseguel KB, Khan A, Parente Rocha JA, Sampaio P, da Silva Briones MR, e Ferreira RC, de Medeiros Muniz M, Castañón-Olivares LR, Estrada-Barcenas D, Cassagne C, Mary C, Duan SY, Kong F, Sun AY, Zeng X, Zhao Z, Gantois N, Botterel F, Robbertse B, Schoch C, Gams W, Ellis D, Halliday C, Chen S, Sorrell TC, Piarroux R, Colombo AL, Pais C, de Hoog S, Zancopé-Oliveira RM, Taylor ML, Toriello C, de Almeida Soares CM, Delhaes L, Stubbe D, Dromer F, Ranque S, Guarro J, Cano-Lira JF, Robert V, Velegraki A, Meyer W. International Society of Human and Animal Mycology (ISHAM)-ITS reference DNA barcoding database--the quality controlled standard tool for routine identification of human and animal pathogenic fungi. Med Mycol. 2015;53:313–337. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myv008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rex JH, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute . Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts: approved standard. 3. Wayne: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nunes JM, Bizerra FC, Ferreira RCE, Colombo AL. Molecular identification, antifungal susceptibility profile, and biofilm formation of clinical and environmental Rhodotorula species isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:382–389. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01647-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Espinel-Ingroff A, Pfaller M, Erwin ME, Jones RN. Interlaboratory evaluation of Etest method for testing antifungal susceptibilities of pathogenic yeasts to five antifungal agents by using Casitone agar and solidified RPMI 1640 medium with 2% glucose. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:848–852. doi: 10.1128/JCM.34.4.848-852.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Falces-Romero I, Cendejas-Bueno E, Romero-Gómez MP, García-Rodríguez J. Isolation of Rhodotorula mucilaginosa from blood cultures in a tertiary care hospital. Mycoses. 2018;61:35–39. doi: 10.1111/myc.12703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Park Y-K, Nicaud J-M, Ledesma-Amaro R. The engineering potential of Rhodosporidium toruloides as a workhorse for biotechnological applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2018;36:304–317. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Meletiadis J, Arabatzis M, Bompola M, Tsiveriotis K, Hini S, Petinaki E, Velegraki A, Zerva L. Comparative evaluation of three commercial identification systems using common and rare bloodstream yeast isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:2722–2727. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01253-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cabral AM, da Siveira RS, Brito-Santos F, Peres da Silva JR, MacDowell ML, Melhem MSC, Mattos-Guaraldi AL, Hirata Junior R, Damasco PV. Endocarditis due to Rhodotorula mucilaginosa in a kidney transplanted patient: case report and review of medical literature. JMM Case Rep. 2017;4:e005119. doi: 10.1099/jmmcr.0.005119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Figueiredo-Carvalho MHG, Barbedo LS, Oliveira MME, Brito-Santos F, Almeida-Paes R, Zancopé-Oliveira RM. Comparison of commercial methods and the CLSI broth microdilution to determine the antifungal susceptibility of Candida parapsilosis complex bloodstream isolates from Three Health Institutions in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Mycopathologia. 2014;178:27–35. doi: 10.1007/s11046-014-9771-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nishikawa Marília Martins, Almeida-Paes Rodrigo, Brito-Santos Fabio, Nascimento Carlos Roberto, Fialho Miguel Madi, Trilles Luciana, Morales Bernadina Penarrieta, da Silva Sérgio Alves, Santos Wallace, Santos Lucilaide Oliveira, Fortes Silvana Tulio, Cardarelli-Leite Paola, Lázera Márcia dos Santos. Comparative antifungal susceptibility analyses of Cryptococcus neoformans VNI and Cryptococcus gattii VGII from the Brazilian Amazon Region by the Etest, Vitek 2, and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methods. Medical Mycology. 2019;57(7):864–873. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myy150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gutierrez-Galhardo MC, Zancopé-Oliveira RM, Monzón A, Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Cuenca-Estrella M. Antifungal susceptibility profile in vitro of Sporothrix schenckii in two growth phases and by two methods: microdilution and E-test. Mycoses. 2010;53:227–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2009.01701.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.