Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 5.
Published in final edited form as: Trends Cancer. 2019 Oct 5;5(10):573–576. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2019.08.001

Targeting Mindsets, Not Just Tumors

Sean R Zion 1, Lidia Schapira 2, Alia J Crum 1,*
PMCID: PMC7059887  NIHMSID: NIHMS1067563  PMID: 31706503

Abstract

Mindsets - beliefs about the nature and workings of things the world - are a critical but relatively understudied variable that can influence psychological wellbeing and physiological health in patients with cancer. Precise, targeted psychological interventions aimed at shifting patient mindsets have the potential to transform supportive care in oncology.

Keywords: Mindset, Cancer, Intervention, Psychological Support, Quality of Life


The hallmark of the cell is its remarkable capacity for division and growth. Cancer thrives on hijacking and unleashing this power, driving the uncontrolled growth and spread of abnormal cells throughout the body. Halting the spread of these malignant cells has been the focus of oncology for decades. Recent years have witnessed a dramatic shift in the landscape of anticancer therapies, from largely toxic and only moderately effective chemotherapeutic agents toward more precise and targeted therapeutics like kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and immunotherapy [1]. Thanks in large part to these advancements, today two thirds of all patients with cancer will live at least five years after their diagnosis [2].

But cancer is more than just a physical disease. The psychological and social impact can be relentless, presenting challenges not just at diagnosis but throughout treatment and even well into recovery [3]. Unfortunately, this can often spiral negatively and lead to catastrophic thinking processes that can drive depression and anxiety, which are 2–3 times more common in patients with cancer than the general population [4]. But these negative psychological ramifications are not an inevitable response to the diseased state of the body. Indeed, two patients with the same type and stage of cancer may look very different psychologically: while one patient’s catastrophic thoughts propel them into depression and anxiety, another clinically indistinguishable patient may view it as an opportunity for positive change.

There are a number of factors that influence how a patient responds to a diagnosis of cancer, manages the ongoing challenges of treatment, and navigates their post-treatment life, including interactions with their care team, social support, coping style, personality and socioeconomic status [5]. However, a key, but often overlooked, factor are the mindsets that patients hold. Mindsets are beliefs about the nature and processes of things the world (Figure 1). Not necessarily true or false, mindsets are simplified understandings of what is possible or likely. People have mindsets about many things in life (e.g., “intelligence is malleable”; “healthy foods are disgusting”; “statins are effective”). When it comes to cancer, mindsets about the meaning of illness and the capability of their bodies are particularly important.

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

What are mindsets and how do they work? (A) Facts about mindsets. (B) Key mindsets that matter in the context of cancer.

Is cancer a catastrophe or an opportunity?

In the face of a cancer diagnosis, some people might think “this is a catastrophe”. This view is not entirely unfounded as both cancer and cancer treatment can present considerable challenges. But like the cancer itself, the mindset that “cancer is a catastrophe” can take hold and spread, permeating all aspects of a patient’s life. A patient who has the mindset that cancer is a catastrophe may find themselves stuck in exhaustive cycle of rumination and worry. They may retreat from social roles and activities they previously enjoyed. Burdened by the frustrations and uncertainty that this mindset directs the patient’s attention to, they may not be motivated to take an active role in managing their own medical care.

More adaptive mindsets are possible. Some people adopt the mindset that “cancer is manageable”, and some may even view cancer as an opportunity. These mindsets will also permeate a patient’s life, operating in ways that can become self-fulfilling. The mindset that “cancer can be an opportunity” can shift a patient’s perspective towards meaning making, foster a renewed appreciation for life, inspire personal growth, or motivate important lifestyle changes like eating well and getting exercise. Viewing cancer as an opportunity does not mean that cancer itself is a good thing or that battling it is easy; but rather, that the experience of cancer can be a catalyst for positive change that would not have been possible otherwise.

Is my body working for or against me?

A cancer diagnosis may also evoke concerns about one’s own body. Patients may ask themselves: is my body working against me? Some patients initially adopt the mindset their body is an adversary and their very own cells have turned against them. This selective interpretation shifts attention towards physical symptoms and side effects, which are interpreted as a signal of the body’s adversarial nature. These patients may seek out unneeded treatments or request unnecessarily strong medications because they perceive their body as inherently incapable. This impact of this mindset may spread far beyond the boundaries of treatment, increasing fear of cancer recurrence months or years down the road.

However, there are other, more useful ways for a patient to think about one’s body after a diagnosis of cancer. Patients can adopt the mindset that their body is capable, strong, and naturally resilient. This mindset orients patients towards signals that their body is handing cancer well, rather than towards the symptoms of illness and side effects of treatment. It may motivate patients to engage in health promoting physical activities during their treatment rather than avoid them out of fear that their body is unable to handle any undue stress. Critically, adopting and maintaining this mindset may help patients manage the fear of cancer recurrence that can emerge after the end of active treatment – a time during which some patients may feel that their body is particularly vulnerable to a recurrence of cancer [6].

Targeting mindsets through psychologically wise interventions

A patient’s mindset is not contingent upon the objective clinical reality of their cancer. Above and beyond disease status, these mindsets relate to physical functioning, social functioning, perceived health, and quality of life [7]. Even more importantly, mindsets can be changed. Just as more precise, targeted, and tolerable treatments for cancer have emerged in the field of oncology, similarly advanced interventions are emerging in psychology. Encouraging research on the psychological sciences of “wise intervention” has found that mindsets are an especially useful target for interventions because they can be changed fairly easily, and these changes confer significant downstream impacts [8].

Although these interventions have not yet been investigated in patients with cancer, encouraging evidence of their efficacy has been demonstrated in other disciplines. For example, short film clips presenting research on how stress can be useful (versus detrimental) to employees evokes a “stress is enhancing” mindset which, in turn, leads to positive changes in motivation, mood, and physiology (e.g., regulation of cortisol and increased DHEAS) in the face of a stressor [9, 10]. Brief classroom workshops aimed at establishing the mindset that “intelligence is malleable” (versus “fixed”) in students leads to sustained motivation and improved academic performance in mathematics over time [11]. In a randomized control trial of oral immunotherapy for children with life threatening peanut allergies, framing information about symptoms and side effects as “a sign of treatment efficacy” (as opposed to an “unfortunate byproduct”) made patients less anxious, reduced serious adverse events, and heightened treatment efficacy (as measured by higher levels of immunoglobulin G4 ) [12].

Just as more precise cancer treatments have become widely available, it is time for wise psychosocial interventions to become the standard of supportive care in oncology. More diffuse psychosocial interventions including Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR), Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), and psychoeducation, among others, have been applied in the context of cancer. These interventions provide proof of principle that focusing on the psychological and social elements of the cancer experience can alter both functional and disease specific outcomes [13]. However, these interventions can be burdensome, requiring in-person access to a team of specialized care providers, like psychologists or social workers, thereby restricting access and increasing costs. In contrast, precisely targeted, well-timed, and relatively brief, mindset interventions are both time- and cost-effective, amenable to remote administration or other means of dissemination that do not add burden to an already strapped patient or healthcare team.

A call to action

There are a number of ways mindsets could be more effectively leveraged to benefit patients with cancer (Figure 2). First, by packaging these interventions into digital toolkits or online modules, patients can access effective psychological interventions from the comfort of their own homes where they may be most receptive to them [14, 15]. Second, we can empower current and former cancer patients to help shift the cultural conversation around cancer. In sharing their own experiences, these potential role models can provide insight into the importance of adopting useful mindsets during the cancer experience. Finally, we can leverage the power of the patient-provider relationship and train patient care teams to identify patients who hold maladaptive mindsets – like the mindset that cancer is a catastrophe or that the body is an adversary – and help these patients establish more adaptive mindsets.

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Strategies for implementing mindset interventions in oncology. (A) Use remotely administered online modules. (B) Utilize the experience and insight of cancer survivors. (C) Leverage the patient-provider relationship to shape mindsets.

Much like the growth and spread of malignant cells in the body, similarly malignant mindsets can cast a shadow over the lived experience of the patient. As we strive to target these malignant cells with the latest cutting-edge treatments, we should simultaneously strive to provide equally precise treatments for the psychological and social ramification of the illness. We hope this article serves as an inspiring call to action for granting agencies, medical institutions, and the healthcare establishment to recognize the potential of precise psychological interventions, like those that target mindsets, to better support patients as they navigate their cancer experience.

References

  • 1.Haber DA, Gray NS, and Baselga J (2011). The evolving war on cancer. Cell 145, 19–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Noone A, Howlader N, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis D, et al. (2018). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2015, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD. SEER Cancer Stat. Rev. 1975–2015, Natl. Cancer Institute; Bethesda, MD. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Simard S, Thewes B, Humphris G, Dixon M, Hayden C, Mireskandari S, and Ozakinci G (2013). Fear of cancer recurrence in adult cancer survivors: A systematic review of quantitative studies. J. Cancer Surviv. 7, 300–322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mitchell AJ, Chan M, Bhatti H, Halton M, Grassi L, Johansen C, and Meader N (2011). Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder in oncological, haematological, and palliative-care settings: A meta-analysis of 94 interview-based studies. Lancet Oncol. 12, 160–174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stanton AL, Revenson TA, and Tennen H (2006). Health Psychology: Psychological Adjustment to Chronic Disease. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58, 565–592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fardell JE, Thewes B, Turner J, Gilchrist J, Sharpe L, Girgis A, & Butow P (2016). Fear of cancer recurrence: a theoretical review and novel cognitive processing formulation. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 10(4), 663–673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zion SR, Dweck CS, and Crum AJ (2018). In Sickness and in Health: Validation of a Health Mindset Scale in Healthy and Chronically Ill Populations. In Society for Personality and Social Psychology; (Atlanta, GA: ), p. 103. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Walton GM, and Wilson TD (2018). Wise Interventions: Psychological Remedies for Social and Personal Problems. Psychol. Rev. 125, 617–655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Crum AJ, Akinola M, Martin A, and Fath S (2017). The role of stress mindset in shaping cognitive, emotional, and physiological responses to challenging and threatening stress. Anxiety, Stress, Coping, 1–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Crum AJ, Salovey P, and Achor S (2013). Rethinking stress: The role of mindsets in determining the stress response. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 104, 716–733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Blackwell LS, Trzesniewski KH, and Dweck CS (2007). Implicit Theories of Intelligence Predict Achievement across an Adolescent Transition: A Longitudinal Study and an Intervention. Child Dev. 78, 246–263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Howe LC, Leibowitz KA, Perry MA, Bitler JM, Block W, Kaptchuk TJ, Nadeau KC, and Crum AJ (2019). Changing Patient Mindsets about Non–Life-Threatening Symptoms during Oral Immunotherapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract., 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Faller H, Schuler M, Richard M, Heckl U, Weis J, and Kuffner R (2013). Effects of psycho-oncologic interventions on emotional distress and quality of life in adult patients with cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 782–793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Clover KA, Mitchell AJ, Britton B, and Carter G (2015). Why do oncology outpatients who report emotional distress decline help? Psychooncology. 24, 812–818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Compen F, Bisseling E, Schellekens M, Donders R, Carlson L, van der Lee M, and Speckens A (2018). Face-to-face and internet-based mindfulness-based cognitive therapy compared with treatment as usual in reducing psychological distress in patients with cancer: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 36, 2413–2421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES